Peremennye Zvezdy (Variable Stars) 41, No. 6, 2021 Received 4 November; accepted 17 November. |
Article in PDF |
DOI: 10.24412/2221-0474-2021-41-27-38
|
In September, 2021, we obtained ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cataclysmic variables (CVs) are close binary systems, in which the primary component is a white dwarf (WD), and the secondary one is a red or brown dwarf of a late spectral type, filling its Roche lobe. As a result, matter from the secondary component passes through the inner Lagrange point L1, is accreted onto the WD, and forms an accretion stream. Due to the fast orbital motion, this stream does not fall directly on the WD, but swirls in the direction of orbital motion, and an accretion disk arises around the WD. As a rule, the disk and bright formations on it make the greatest contribution to the optical radiation coming from the system. Flares, humps appear on the light curve, and rapid brightness variations (flickering), depressions and other peculiarities can be observed; see, for example, Warner (1995), Osaki (1996, 2005), Cherepashchuk et al. (1996), Hellier (2001), Giovannelli (2008), Kato (2015) and other papers.
One of the CV types is SU UMa-type stars (UGSU) and their subtypes: ER UMa and WZ Sge stars.
For SU UMa stars, we observe two types of outbursts: normal ones
and superoutbursts. The normal outburst durations are only several
days, with amplitudes up to
; a superoutburst lasts for
two weeks or more. The amplitude of a superoutburst is also larger
than that of the ordinary one by
(Kato et al., 2009a).
The average time interval between subsequent superoutbursts is
called a "supercycle". Normal (ordinary) outbursts occur between
superoutbursts. Stars of the WZ Sge subtype do not exhibit
ordinary outbursts.
CVs of the ER UMa subtype have the shortest supercycles, tens of
days, between which usual outbursts are also observed. The
amplitude of all types of outbursts in stars of this subtype is
the smallest for SU UMa type stars and amounts to several
magnitudes, see Patterson et al. (2013), Zemko et al. (2014),
Ohshima et al. (2014), Kato et al. (2016b), Shugarov et al.
(2018).
![]() |
Fig. 1.
Light curve of the OT J231110.9+013003 in
the |
![]() |
Fig. 2. Phase light curve, folded with the superhump period found from our data in the JD 2459465-469 time interval. |
WZ Sge-subtype stars have the largest outburst amplitudes, up to
(Kato, 2015). Hereafter, we designate such stars as
"SUWZ".
In some cases, the photometric behavior of SUWZ stars can be
similar to light variations of classical novae. However, outbursts
with amplitudes as large as 19, like that observed for the
classic nova V1500 Cyg (see Honda et al., 1975; Harevich et al.,
1975; Young et al., 1976) were never observed for SUWZ stars.
During superoutbursts, all mentioned objects show sinusoidal
brightness variations called superhumps. Their periods are not
strictly constant, they can vary by several percent; the
amplitudes can also change, their average value being
. Superhumps have three stages (Kato et al., 2009a). Stage
"A" is early evolution, during which the superhump amplitude
increases. During the stage "B", a prolonged "plateau" is
observed; at this time, the brightness of the star slowly
decreases, and the superhumps are most pronounced. At the final
stage of the superoutbursts, "C", they are less distinct and
their amplitude usually decreases.
Most of such stars have superhump periods longer than their orbital period, and the observed brightness variations are called "positive superhumps". If the period of the superhumps is slightly less than the orbital period, such brightness variations are called "negative superhumps".
![]() |
Fig. 3. Light curve (bottom) and color indices (top) according to our data. Reddening of the variable's color indices is seen during depressions. See also the caption to Fig. 1. |
In some CVs of the SUWZ type, repeating echo outbursts, or rebrightenings, with a shorter duration and smaller amplitudes are observed after the main superoutburst. For example, 11 rebrightenings were observed for EZ Lyn (Kato et al., 2009b; Pavlenko et al., 2007) and for TCPJ18154219+3515598 (Zubareva et al., 2018). For ASASSN-15po (Namekata et al., 2017), 10 rebrightenings were detected. EG Cnc (Kimura et al., 2021), ASASSN-18fk (Pavlenko et al., 2019), and V1006 Cyg (Kato et al., 2016a; Pavlenko et al., 2018) had 6 rebrightenings. MASTER OT J203749.39+552210.3 showed 4 rebrightenings; MASTER OT J211258.65+242145.4 exhibited 8 rebrightenings (Nakata et al., 2013). A possible explanation for this phenomenon is given by Meyer & Meyer-Hofmeister (2015).
During a superoutburst, due to large energetics, the disk shape is distorted to elliptical, and precession rotation begins. Y. Osaki showed that such behavior in a CV system can be explained by simultaneous action of the tidal-instability and thermal-instability mechanisms (Osaki, 1989, 1996, 2005; Whitehurst, 1988) and can cause the appearance of superhumps.
In this model, for a system with a low mass ratio
, the radius of the disk can reach the size at which the
ratio of the orbital period of the system and the orbital period
of a physical point on the disk becomes 3:1. Because of such ratio
of the periods, resonant rotation sets in the accretion disk. At
this time, eccentric instability becomes most pronounced, the
turbulence, as well as mass exchange rate, increases, a
superoutbursts starts, and superhumps appear on the light curves;
see Kato et al. (2009a), Kato (2015), Hirose & Osaki (1990),
Whitehurst (1988), Osaki (1989, 1996), Ringwald et al. (2012),
Udalski (1988).
As a result, the same configuration of the elliptical precessing
disk, the hot formation on it, and the orbital phase repeat at a
time interval equal to the superhump period:
"Negative superhumps" can be explained with the accretion disk being inclined to the orbital plane and with the simultaneous nutational motion of it. An explanation of this phenomenon can be found in Udalski (1988), Harvey et al. (1995), Wood & Burke (2007), Ohshima et al. (2014).
CVs with negative superhumps are rare compared to those with positive superhumps, so their study is of special interest; see Patterson (2002), Ohshima et al. (2014), Sosnovskij et al. (2017), Sklyanov et al. (2020), Pavlenko et al. (2021), Ringwald et al. (2012).
Soon after a superoutburst, "early superhumps" may appear in SUWZ stars. At this time, the system shows a small amplitude, about a few hundredths of a magnitude, the optical modulation having the shape of a double wave and repeating with the same period as the orbital one. Kato (2015) explains this behavior by the fact that, for a low mass ratio of the components, the accretion disk can reach the size at which the 1:2 resonance can occur in the system. This resonance is stronger than the 3:1 resonance described above. In this case, two-arm waves appear on the disk, and a two-peaked wave must appear on the light curves. Note that this phenomenon is not observed for SU UMa stars.
The previous superoutburst of USNO-B1.0 0915-0569037 = OT
J231110.9+013003 (hereafter J2311) was discovered by Koichi
Itagaki and observed in November, 2007 (see the AAVSO database);
however, a detailed light curve was not recorded. According to
data from the SDSS, the color indices of J2311 are small (the
object is clearly white or blue); the star was included by Kato et
al. (2012) in the CV candidate list. In the AAVSO VSX Index, the
object has the name AAVSO UID 000-BCY-485, where also the
brightness variation limits
-
and the
variability type UG are given.
Yutaka Maeda (see vsnet-alert No. 27671) detected a new outburst
of the object outburst to 142 on August 27, 2021. This
outburst was partially restored from the ZTF database (Masci et
al., 2019). During these observations, the star was at the
"plateau" stage after the outburst.
On September 8, 2021, immediately after the announcement of the
new outburst (vsnet alert No. 27671), we began to observe the star
using the 60-cm telescope of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
(Stará Lesná) equipped the FLI ML3041 CCD camera. Since the
star at this time was already at 15, most of the observations
were carried out without a filter, in integral light. However,
whenever possible, we obtained
measurements in order
to analyze color variations of J2311 during the outburst. In
addition to our observations, Alexey Sosnovskij obtained an
estimate with the 2.6-m ZTSh telescope of the Crimean Observatory
on JD 2459493, and Natalya Ikonnikova carried out
measurements with a 60-cm reflector at the Caucasian Mountain
Observatory of the Sternberg Astronomical Institute (Moscow
University) on JD 2459496.
As a result, we obtained more than 1100 CCD brightness
measurements in the passbands and in integral light
during 15 nights (See Table 1).
JD 24... | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
59466.55 | 15.546 | 3 | 16.252 | 3 | 16.00 | 3 | 15.815 | 102 | 15.683 | 3 |
59467.46 | 16.097 | 1 | 16.971 | 2 | 16.717 | 1 | 16.595 | 107 | 16.435 | 2 |
59468.48 | - | - | 19.11 | 3 | 18.60 | 3 | 18.27 | 65 | 17.916 | 3 |
59469.53 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18.84 | 201 | - | - |
59473.47 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17.644 | 202 | - | - |
59475.43 | - | - | 17.015 | 4 | 16.769 | 3 | 16.545 | 63 | 16.418 | 4 |
59477.55 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16.55 | 15 | - | - |
59482.48 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18.6 | 8 | - | - |
59484.46 | - | - | 16.840 | 7 | 16.525 | 5 | 16.383 | 235 | 16.21 | 5 |
59485.42 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17.362 | 36 | - | - |
59489.38 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19.41 | 2 | - | - |
59490.37 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19.75 | 6 | - | - |
59492.33 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19.95 | 11 | - | - |
59493.31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19.73 | 9 | - | - |
59496.41 | - | - | 20.8 | 3 | 20.35 | 3 | 19.98 | 3 | - | - |
![]() |
Fig. 4. Position of the star in the two-color diagram during the outburst. The main sequence and blackbody lines are also drawn. |
We used the star of the horizontal branch of our Galaxy 2MASS
J23105687+0132563 (= HE 2308+0116, see Christlieb et al., 2005) as
the main standard. The following magnitudes of this star have been
found using the standard stars located near AG Peg (Henden &
Munari, 2006) for calibration:
We estimate the measurement uncertainty for this star as a few
hundredths of a magnitude; for , the error can be about
. Additionally, we also measured 6 stars around the
variable.
Comparison of quasi-simultaneous observations of the variable with
respect to this standard in integral light and in the
passband showed that the discrepancy usually did not exceed
0
1, and we accepted that the magnitude in integral light was
the same as
. Our
,
data, as well as earlier
observations from the ZTF and other sources (open circles), are
plotted in Fig. 1.
It appears from Fig. 1 that we began to observe the star on the
last day of the plateau stage; thereafter, the brightness of J2311
began to decrease rapidly. Frequency analysis of the data using
the Fourier method showed the presence of a periodic component
with a period of 005161 (see Fig. 2). This period was seen
during the brightness decrease (JD 2459466-469). However, note
that alternative periods, 0
049 and 0
053, which
correspond to the closest daily aliases to our period, can also be
true.
We see in Fig. 1 that, after a short-term brightness decrease to
almost 19, two rebrightenings took place, during which the
brightness increased by 2
. The second rebrightening was shorter
than the first one, and it was the last one in this series of
outbursts. However, the fact of this phenomenon proves that the
star belongs to the SUWZ subclass, since no rebrightenings are
observed for SU UMa-type stars. Also note that we did not find
periodic processes in J2311 during these rebrightenings.
![]() |
Fig. 5.
The |
![]() |
Fig. 7.
The color-magnitude diagram. The vertical
axis on the left shows the visible magnitude and on the right, the
absolute magnitude.The distance modulus is assumed to be
|
Thus, our object belongs to a relatively rare type of SUWZ stars
with rebrightenings. Later, the star reached the level of 20,
which is brighter than before the outburst. According to various
sources, the brightness at quiescence is
, and the
total outburst amplitude was
, typical of such stars.
Figure 3 shows the light curves in the and
passbands
(bottom part of the figure) according to our data and (top)
changes of the color indices
,
, and
. The
average overnight measurements from Table 1 are plotted here.
Only two multicolor measurements were obtained during the brightness decline, but it is clearly seen that all three color indices increased, i.e. the variable became red compared to the outburst stage. During the fading, the main contribution to the object's light still comes from the accretion disk, but its temperature obviously decreased after the end of the outburst.
Note that such color behavior is typical of most CVs, cf. Šimon et al. (2001), Pavlenko et al. (2002ab, 2005, 2008), Katysheva et al. (2013), Neustroev et al. (2017).
Temperature variations can be evaluated more accurately using
two-color diagrams. We present three diagrams for different
photometric passbands, i.e. for different ranges of the spectrum
covered with the photometric system.
From the diagram (Fig. 4), it can be seen that the
average color temperature reached about 10,000 K during the
outburst. We notice from the same figure that all 7 comparison
stars are located near the main sequence. Their galactic latitudes
are about
, and we conclude that the interstellar
reddening in the direction to the program star is low. Note that,
on average, color temperatures of such stars are higher, they can
reach 12000-15000 K.
The other two-color diagrams, based on the redder passbands of the
spectrum (
, Figs. 5 and 6), show a slightly
lower color temperature. At these wavelengths, the total radiation
comes from the cooler outer zones of the accretion disk. The color
temperature changes from 9000 K during the outburst to 6000 K
during the brightness decline; obviously, the color temperature in
the disk decreases after the outburst.
For comparison, we remind that color temperature varied within similar limits for other stars of the SUWZ type, see Shugarov et al. (2018), Golysheva et al. (2012), Chochol et al. (2010, 2015), Golysheva & Shugarov (2014), Golysheva et al. (2017). However, on average, as can be seen from the cited papers, other CVs have temperatures higher than that of J2311. At quiescence, the color temperature may increase again, due to the main contribution to the flux coming from the hot WD at that stage. Unfortunately, we are currently able to obtain only observations without a filter, in integral light, and have no possibility to estimate the temperature.
Figure 7 shows the track of J2311 on the color-magnitude diagram
(actually, the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram). It can be seen how
the star's light declined after the outburst. However, at the end
of our observations, the luminosity of the object remains
significantly higher than the luminosity of a standard WD;
obviously, the contribution from the accretion disk is still
significant. The fraction of radiation from the red component at
this time is negligible, since the color index remains blue.
Unfortunately, the data we obtained is not sufficient to accurately calculate parameters of the cataclysmic system. However, some preliminary conclusions can be presented.
According to the relation from Patterson (2011, eq. 3), we find
the absolute magnitude at outburst maximum for J2311:
. Thus, the distance modulus is
, corresponds to the system's distance about
630 pc (if we neglect the interstellar absorption of light).
The orbital period is unknown, but the period of superhumps at stage "B" is known. For approximate calculations, we can use this superhump period instead of the orbital period, since the difference between these periods is usually no more than 5%.
Also, the value of
is still unknown, making it
impossible to find the mass ratio of the components more
accurately (see Kato et al., 2009a, 2017, 2020).
The approximate mass ratio as a function of the orbital period is
given by Patterson (1998, Fig. 6; 2011, Fig. 8). We find that
. The mass of the donor star can be taken, using the
orbital period of
, as
(Knigge
et al., 2011, Fig. 9). The mass of the white dwarf in our case is
evaluated as
.
The distance between the components (semi-major axis of the orbit) is only 0.5 of the solar radius according to the Kepler-Newton law.
Note that J2311 is similar to ASASSN-15po (Namekata et al., 2017).
The duration of the outburst (plateau) for both stars was about 30
days, the total amplitude was
; both stars have very
short periods (for stage "B"), 0
05091 for ASASSN-15po and
0
05161 for J2311, and showed rebrightenings after the main
outburst (probably 9 events for ASASSN-15po and 2, for J2311). In
the cited paper, its authors found the ratio of the masses of the
components
much more accurately than for J2311, and
also described the evolutionary status of the object. Since both
stars have the shortest periods among SUWZ stars, a comparison of
these objects is very relevant.
For a more accurate modelling, explaining of the processes occurring in our system, and determining accurate physical parameters of the components, we need new photometric and spectral observations of J2311. However, the interval between the recent outburst and the previous one was 14 years. Therefore, the probability of a new outburst that would permit new detailed study of the star during the next several years is low.
We have shown that:
- the program star is a typical WZ Sge-subtype variable with an
outburst amplitude
;
- rebrightenings of the object occurred;
- the duration of the outburst to the end of the plateau was about 30 days;
- the period of superhumps at stage "B" was
;
- the color temperature at the time of the outburst was about 10000 K and then decreased to 6000 K after it.
We estimated the distance to the system and the possible mass ratio of the components.
S. Shugarov is grateful for the support from the Slovak Academy of Sciences (VEGA 2/0030/21, APVV-20-0148) and from M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University Program "Leading scientific schools", the project "Physics of stars, relativistic objects, and galaxies". S. Malashevich is thankful to the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for financial support through grant 075-15-2020-780. The authors are also grateful to Drs. N. Ikonnikova and A. Sosnovsky for their help in observations.
References:
Cherepashchuk, A.M., Katysheva, N.A., Khruzina, T.S. & Shugarov, S.Yu., 1996, Highly Evolved Binary Stars, Gordon and Breach Publ., Brussels, Belgium
Chochol, D., Katysheva, N.A., Shugarov, S.Yu. et al., 2010, Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnaté Pleso, 40, 19
Chochol, D., Shugarov, S., Katysheva, N., et al., 2015, Acta Polytechnica, 2(1), 165
Christlieb, N., Beers, T.C., Thom, C. et al., 2005, Astron. & Astrophys., 431, 143
Giovannelli, F., 2008, Chinese J. Astron. & Astrophys. Suppl., 8, 237
Golysheva P., Antipin, S., Zharova, A., et al., 2012, Astrophysics, 55, 208
Golysheva, P. & Shugarov, S., 2014, Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnaté Pleso, 43, 312
Golysheva, P., Shugarov, S., Goranskij, V., Vozyakova, O., 2017, Central European Astrophys. Bull., 41, 79
Harevich, V., Bocharov, A.N., Shugarov, S.Yu., et al., 1975, IAU Circulars, No 2839
Harvey, D., Skillman, D.R. & Patterson, J., Ringman, F.A., 1995, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 107, 551
Hellier, C., 2001, Cataclysmic Variable Stars: How and Why they Vary, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Henden, A. & Munari, U., 2006, Astron. & Astrophys., 458, 339
Hirose, M. & Osaki, Y., 1990, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 42, 135
Honda, M., Osawa, K., Osada, K., et al., 1975, IAU Circulars, No 2826
Kato, T., Imada, A., Uemura, M., et al., 2009a, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 61, S395
Kato, T., Pavlenko, E., Maehara, H., et al., 2009b, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 61, 601
Kato, T., Maehara, T. & Uemura, M., 2012, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 64, 63
Kato, T., 2015, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 67, 108
Kato, T., Pavlenko, E.P., Shchurova, A.V., et al., 2016a, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 68, article id. L4
Kato, T., Ishioka, R., Isogai, K., et al., 2016b, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 68, article id. 107
Kato, T., Isogai, K., Hambsch, F.-J., et al., 2017, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 69, article id. 75
Kato, T., Isogai, K., Wakamatsu, Ya., et al., 2020, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 72, article id. 14
Katysheva, N., Shugarov, S., Chochol, D., et al., 2013, Central European Astrophys. Bull., 37, 335
Kimura, M., Isogai, K., Kato, T., et al., 2021, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 73, article id. 1
Knigge, C., Baraffe, I. & Patterson, J., 2011, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 194, 28
Masci, F.J., Laher, R.R., Rusholme, B., et al., 2019, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 131, 018003
Meyer, F. & Meyer-Hofmeister, E., 2015, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 67, article id. 52
Nakata, C., Ohshima, T., Kato, T., et al., 2013, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 65, article id. 117
Namekata, K., Isogai, K., Kato, T., et al., 2017, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 69, article id. 2
Neustroev, V.V., Marsh, T.R., Zharikov, S.V., et al., 2017, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 467, 597
Ohshima, T., Kato, T., Pavlenko, E., et al., 2014, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 66, article id. 67
Osaki, Y., 1989, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 41, 1005
Osaki, Y., 1996, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 108, 39
Osaki, Y., 2005, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Ser. B: Physical and Biological Sciences, 81, 291
Patterson, J., 1998, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 110, 1132
Patterson, J., 2002, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 114, 1364
Patterson, J., 2011, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 411, 2695
Patterson, J., Uthas, H., Kemp, J., et al., 2013, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 434, 1902
Pavlenko, E.P., Primak, N.V. & Shugarov, S.Yu., 2002a, Astrophysics, 45, 416
Pavlenko, E.P., Shugarov, S.Yu., Goranskij, V.P. & Primak N.V., 2002b, AIP Conference Proc., 637, 519
Pavlenko, E., Antoniuk, K., Shugarov, S.Yu., et al., 2005, Astrophys. & Space Sci., 296, 461
Pavlenko, E., Shugarov, S.Yu., Katysheva, N.A., et al., 2007, ASP Conference Series, 372, 511
Pavlenko, E.P., Shugarov, S.Yu., Baklanova, D.N. & Katysheva, N.A., 2008, Bull. Crimean Astron. Obs., 104, 109
Pavlenko, E.P., Shugarov, S.Yu., Simon, A.O., et al., 2018, Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnaté Pleso, 48, 339
Pavlenko, E., Niijima, K., Mason, P., et al., 2019, Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnaté Pleso, 49, 204
Pavlenko, E.P., Sosnovskii, A.P., Antonyuk, K.A., et al., 2021, Astrophysics, 64, 331
Ringwald, F.A., Velasco, K., Roveto, J.J., & Meyers, M.E., 2012, New Astronomy, 17, 433
Shugarov, S.Y., Katysheva, N.A., Chochol, D., et al., 2018, Astrophys. & Space Sci., 363, article id. 100
Šimon, V., Shugarov, S. & Marsakova, V.I., 2001, Astronomy & Astrophys., 366, 100
Sklyanov, A.S., Pavlenko, E.P., Antonyuk, K.A., et al., 2020, Astrophysics, 63, 200
Sosnovskij, A., Pavlenko, E., Pit, N. & Antoniuk, K., 2017, Inform. Bull. Var. Stars, No 6216
Udalski, A., 1988, Acta Astron., 38, 315
Warner B., 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars, Cambridge Astrophys. Ser., 28
Whitehurst, R., 1988, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 232, 35
Wood, M.A. & Burke, C.J., 2007, Astron. J., 661, 1042
Young, P.J., Corwin, H.G., Bryan, J. & de Vaucouleurs, G., 1976, Astrophys. J., 209, 882
Zemko, P., Shugarov, S., Kato, T. & Katysheva, N., 2014, Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnaté Pleso, 43, 319
Zubareva, A.M., Shugarov, S.Yu. & Zharova, A.V., 2018, Proceedings of the acad. A.A. Boyarchuk Memorial Conference, INASAN Science Proceedings, eds. D.V. Bisikalo and D.S. Wiebe, Moscow: Yanus-K, p. 120