Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.msu.ru/science/details/2010/101021-moscow-eu-ru-call.pdf Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Tue Nov 9 11:12:38 2010 Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Fri Feb 11 05:02:05 2011 Êîäèðîâêà:

Proposals and projects in the
Coordinated Call FP7-ICT-2011-EU-Russia Information Meeting
Moscow: 21st October, 2010


EU-Russia Call

· First ICT Joint Call with Russia (dedicated INCO Call in WP 11-12); joint calls have already been implemented in other areas of FP7 · Russia is investing in High Performance Computing: No 12 supercomputer in the top500 list is Russian; aiming to enter Top3 already in 2010 (Petaflop range) · Russia has leading academic expertise in a variety of scientific fields that are users of HPC · EU has leading academic expertise in parallel programming and is home to a dynamic ecosystem of innovative HPC tool companies
··· 2 ··· 2


Overview of Call
Target outcomes:
a) Programming Models and Runtime Support generic and portable programming models heterogeneous multicore and accelerator based systems Performance Analysis Tools for High-Performance Computing measurement, analysis, and modeling tools to support hybrid programming tools targeted towards abstract characterisations of the performance of applications Optimisation, Scalability and Porting of Codes Optimisation and scaling of application codes to thousands of cores Examples of application domains: Computational Fluid Dynamics, molecular dynamics, electromagnetic, biology, seismic signal processing and remote sensing.

b)

c)

Call: INCO Russia,

4M EU + 2M Russia,

3 STREPs of 2-years, 1 project per topic
··· 3


a) Programming Models and Runtime Support · Programming models to address programmability and portability issues for multicore and accelerator based systems.
­ Work should focus on developing or selecting specifications of generic and portable programming models (e.g. via languages, directives or library APIs) and provide implementations (compilers and runtime support libraries) on heterogeneous multicore and accelerator based nodes. ­ The models should address the integration issues between system level and node level models in hybrid programming styles as well as compatibility between different low level devices (GPUs, FPGAs,...). ­ Includes flexible and efficient mechanisms for synchronization and locality handling. ­ Efforts to evaluate the developed environments in comparison to other alternatives would be desirable.
Expected Impacts
·Improved understanding of the advantages/disadvantages/applicability of programming models. ·Improved programmability of parallel computing systems. ·Increased cooperation between EU and Russian organisations
··· 4


b) Performance Analysis Tools for High-Performance Computing

· Portable and efficient performance measurement, analysis, and modeling tools to support hybrid programming
­ e.g., mixed MPI/OpenMP/Accelerator both on homogeneous and heterogeneous multicore hardware architectures and accelerators including GPUs and FPGAs.

· Tools should be targeted towards abstract characterisations of the performance of applications hiding the user from the specifics of a given hardware platform from the whole system down to the level of separate low-level units.
Expected Impacts
·The state-of-the-art in hybrid parallel programming methodologies should be significantly advanced. ·Development of tools to support mixed-mode programming and programming of heterogeneous architectures. ·Increased cooperation between EU and Russian organisations
··· 5


c)

Optimisation, Scalability and Porting of Codes

· Optimisation and scaling of application codes to thousands of cores including porting of codes to new (heterogeneous or homogeneous) multicore hardware architectures, using advanced methods, technologies, and tools.
­ Examples include: use of new methods for mesh generation, new solver parallelisation, various forms of task and data parallelisation, utilization of specific accelerators, including GPU and FPGA. ­ Scientific computing domains and application domains are focused on, but not limited to: CFD, molecular dynamics, electromagnetic, biology, seismic signal processing and remote sensing.
Expected Impacts
·The state-of-the-art in optimisation and scalability methodologies should be significantly advanced. Effective measurements of improved performance and comparison between various types of parallelisation will be valuable. ·Porting of codes to bigger number of cores ·Increased cooperation between EU and Russian organisations
··· 6


EU Russia Calls
EU Proposal ­ in English Part A ­ admin details for EU partners Part B: Work of EU partners RU Proposal ­ In Russian Part A ­ admin details for RU partners Part B: Work of RU Partners

Annex: Summary of work of Annex: Summary of work of RU partners EU partners Annex draft Co-ordination agreement Consortium agreement

··· 7


Specific requirements for coordinated call
FP7-ICT-2011-EU-Russia

­ The FP7 proposal and the proposal submitted to the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia will have different administrative parts. The FP7 proposal shall in the administrative part only cover the participants to the EC proposal and their budgeted costs. ­ The Russian participants and their costs and budget are described in the proposal to the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. ­ The description of the work (part B) will be different for the two coordinated proposals.
··· 8


Focused projects (STREPs)
For the EU-RU call
· Purpose: Objective driven research more limited in scope than an IP · Target audience: Industry incl. SMEs, research institutes, universities · Typical duration: · Optimum consortium: · Total EU contribution: 24 months 3-6 participants For this call: MAX: 1.500.000

· Fixed workplan and fixed partnership for duration

··· 9


Specific requirements for coordinated call Eligibility Criterion
FP7-ICT-2011-EU-Russia

Any proposal submitted to the European Commission as a response to the Coordinated Call with Russia must be coordinated with a proposal submitted to the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. Proposals which do not include coordination between the FP7 project and a Russian proposal will be considered ineligible. (see Annex 2 of Guide for Applicants for this call) .
··· 10


Specific requirements for coordinated call Evaluation
FP7-ICT-2011-EU-Russia

To ensure a genuine EU-Russia cooperation, priority in the evaluation will be given to proposals that demonstrate a balanced effort between the two coordinated projects and a research plan properly involving coordinated research activities between Europe and Russia. This will be reflected in the evaluation under the criteria "Impact" and "Implementation"; (see Annex 2 of the Guide for Applicants for this call).
··· 11


Timetable of coordinated call
FP7-ICT-2011-EU-Russia
D AT E 20 July 2010 10 November 2010 12 November 2010 6-8 December 2010 10 December 2010 15-17 December 2010
20-21 December 2010

EC Publish Call

RU Min. of ED and SCI Publish Call

Close Call Evaluation Brussels Close Call Evaluation Russia Finalise List of Proposals Finalise List of Proposals

21 December 2010 28 December 2010 End February 2011 1 January 2011

Meeting to Agree Final Common List of Proposals Ready to Sign Contract Ready to Sign Contract Project Start Project Start

··· 12