Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.law.msu.ru/doc/maleshin-ros-graghd-sud.pdf Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Sun Mar 20 14:59:30 2011 Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Mon Oct 1 22:19:10 2012 Êîäèðîâêà:

. . -. . U. . 2007. 5

.. , , *

-- -- , . , , . : , -- . : 1) ; 2) ; 3) , , ; 4) -; 5) (class actions); 6) ; 7) . : 1) ; 2) , ; 3) ; 4) ; 5) ; 6) .

* , , 19 24 2006 . . () (International Association of Procedural Law) . . 1 Damaska M.R. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. New Haven; L., 1986. P. 3; Snyder J.L., Baldwin C.'S. International Litigation : A Guide to Jurisdiction , Practic e and Strategy / Ed. by D. Epstein . Ardsley , 2002. P. 3/6--3/8. 2 Hazard G.C., Taruffo M. American Civi l Procedure. An Introduction. New Haven; L., 1993. P. 5, 19--22, 86--104; Fleming J., Hazard G.C., LeiibsdorfJ. Civil Procedure. Boston; Toronto; L., 1992. P. 4--10; Jolowicz J.A. On Civi l Procedure . Cambr., 2000. P. 175--182. 3 Merryman J.H. The Civi l Law Tradition. An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Wester n Europe and Latin America . Stanford, 1985. P. Ill--123 ; Langbein J. The German Advantag e in Civi l Procedur e // Universit y of Chicago Law Review . 1985. N 52. P. 824, 826, 835; Kotz H. Civil Justice Systems in Europe and the United States // Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law. 2003. P. 66, 68. '-*-


, -, «». , 4, 5 . , . , , , , , «» . . -, , , . - . . . XVIII -- XIX . . XIX . : 1864. , .
4 Taniguchi Y. The 1996 Code of Civil Procedure of Japan -- A Procedure fo r the Coming Century? // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1997. N 45/4. P. 767--791. 5 Woo M. Y.K., Wang Y. Civi l Justic e in China : An Emperica l Study of Courts in Thre e Provinces / / The America n Journa l o f Comparativ e Law. 2005.N53.P.911 . 6 Merryman J.H. Op. cit . P. 3; Quigley J. Socialis t Law and the Civi l Law Traditio n // America n Journa l of Comparativ e Law. 1989. Vol.37 . N4 . P. 781; ., - . . ., 1997. . 118. , . , - (. : .. . ., 2002. . 775--778). 7 Cappelletti M. Social and Politica l Aspect s of Civi l Litigatio n -- Reforms and Trends in Western and Eastern Europe // Michiga n Law Review. 1971. Vol.69 . P. 875; .. . , 2005. . 52. . .. .


, 1917 ., . . (. Cappelletti) « » (radical Communist solution)9. : ; ; (class actions); . , , «» : -, ; -, . . , . 1864 . 1995 . , . , . 1864 . (), 1918 ., (. 82, 367 ). 90- . XX . , «». 10 ^

8 (In Honore m Mauro Cappelletti (1927-- 2004) / Ed. by M. Storme, F. Carpi. L., 2005). 9 Cappelletti M. Op. cit. P. 879. (Damaska) , « » («The Soviet civi l judg e was expected to take vigorous control over the case» -- Damaska M.R. Op. cit . P. 202). 10 Fleming J., Hazard G.C., LeubsdorfJ. Op. cit . P. 4. ' .: .. : . . .. . . . . ., 1996. . 16.


1995 . 1964 . \ 2002 ., . 1993 . 1995 . . , . . , , . 1995 .: ; , . . , . , . , , , «» , 2 % , . , 1864 . , . 90- . , . : .
12 Carrington P.O. The Civi l Jur y an d America n Democracy / / Duk e Journa l o f Comparative and Internationa l Law. 2003. Vol . 13. N 79. P. 79--94. 13 Joiner C . W . Civi l Justic e and the Jury . Englewoo d Cliffs , 1962. P . IX. 14 .: Murray P.L. Receptio n and Transmissio n of Procedural Law in the Unite d States: A Two-Way Street? A Paper for Deliver y at the Congres s of th e Internationa l Associatio n of Procedural Law, Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 2006.


, 2002 . , 15. , 2002 . , 1995 . , , : -, ; -, ; . . , : ; ; ; . ;: : , , - ' ; . · « - · » («undoubtedly the ; central problem of any system of civil procedure...»)1. . > 1864., . . 1912 . « », , . . 'I
3 . 1995 . // ( , , , , ) / . .. . ., 2004. . 276. 16 Cappelletti M. The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective. Oxford, 1989. P. 252. .: . . ., 1914. . 10--


2002 . , . , 1995 . : ; ; , . -- -- . , « » : , . . - . -- , . . , . . , , ; ; , ; , . , , , , . 1995 ., , 1964 . , . . .-,,«- v<». .-.if.


|9 . ! 1722 .20 : 1864 . 21 , ( , ""). .. , « ...» . 1964 . . - . , , . - , . - , , . . , · , , - i , t .. ! 24 . . , - - > . - · , · , , - j
18 H.J. Justic e in the U.S. S. R. An Interpretatio n of Sovie t Law. Cambr., 1 ' 1963. P. 238. 19 .: .. - // . 2003. 9. . 14. 20 Butler W.E. Russian Law. Oxford, 2003. P. 25. 21 .: .. . ., 1954. 22 ., . : .. . , 1979. . 375--380. 23 . : : / . .. . ., 1989. . 81. 24 Osakwe . The Public Interest and the Role of the Procurato r in Soviet Civi l Litiga tion : A Critical Analysi s // International Law Journal. 1983. N 67; Hazard J.N. The Soviet System of Government. New Haven, 1980. P. 208--209. 3


, , . , , . . , , . 2004 . 5990 , 510 (8 %) . . -- . , XVIII--XIX . 2 5 1917 . 2 6 , ; , , : 1980 . 8618 , 1989.--12500 . . . . 126 , . , , . , , , . , . : , , , , , ; , . , , , . : .. . ., 2005. . 178--185. 26 . : .. : . . ... . . . ., 2004. . .

10

·

'

...'-.

,'

I.

-


, . , . . , , . \ , , , .. , , . 300 000 . 1996 . 15 215 , 2002 . -- 20 270 ( 1/3 ); 2004 . 17 482 , .. 20 % . 20 000 : , 2004 . 19 935 240 . , . 2006 . 23 . -- « » (res judicat a )? . , 28 , , « ». " (Black's Law Dictionary. St. Paul, 2001. P. 60S). 28 ., .: : / . .. . ., 2006. . 552; - / . .. , .. , .. . ., 2003. . 736; .. , // . 2006. 10. . 65--71.




. ( 52854/99 24 2003 . ) : I. 19 1999 . . 34 ( 52854/99) . 9. 30 1997 . 129 544 106. v 10. 28 1998 . . II . 8 1998. , 30 1997 . 18 1998. 12. 18 1999. 17. 22 2001 . - : . : 50. , «», , 19 1999 . , . 1 . 6 . 52. > res judicata, .. - I . , ; - . e.z , - i , . - , -'i . , . '.;., 55. , . 1 . 6 . , -"'
29

\

// URL: www.echr.coe.int, 2007. 18 .

12

-

..·-.-·-.

,.---.·


, . , , - , . . , . 1 . 6 - , , , ; . . 6 , , , , , , . 56. , , , , . 57. , « », . 1 . 6 . , ( , 69529/01 18 2004.) : 1. 21 2001 . . 34 ( 69529/01) , i 24. , . 1 . 6 , , , . , , ,

13


;· : . 25. , . , , . , . , . 28. , . , , . 6 . , . , , « » (res judicata) (.. 52, 55--57 , . 25 ). -- , , , (.. 25,28 , . 52 ). , . f 30 .

X

30 2- 5.02.2007 « 16, 20, 112, 336, 376, 377, 380, 381, 382, 383, 387, 388 389 , " " "" , ».



.

·

,


·~~!0; . () 31 , 32 . . . , 34 , , 35 , , , 36 . , . . , -- 37 , j8 .
31 Pound R. The Spiri t of th e Commo n Law. Ne w Brunswick ; L., 1999. P. 182; Bix B. Jurisprudence : Theor y and Context . L., 2003. P. 145--149; Cross R., Harris J.W. Precedent in Englis h Law. Oxford , 1991 . P. 3. 32 Merry/nan J.H. Op . cit . P. 23. Wiegand W. Americanizatio n of Law: Reception or Convergence? // Legal Cultur e and the Legal Professio n / Ed. by L.M. Friedmann, H.N. Scheiber . N.Y. , 1996. P. 147; MM. : // . 2006. 6. . 105. Zimmennann R. Roman Law, Contemporar y Law, European Law. The Civilia n Traditio n Today. Oxford , 2001 . P. 178. 33 Lasser M . de. Judicia l (Self-) Portraits : Judicia l Discours e i n th e Frenc h Lega l System//Yal e Law Journal. 1995. Vol. 104. N1325 . P. 1351--1355. 36 Guriz A . Source s o f Turkis h Law / / Introductio n t o Turkis h Law /,Ed . b y T . Ansay , D. Wallace . Alphen ; L., 2005. P. 13--14. 37 ., . : .. : . ., 2005 . . 393; .. : . ., 2001. . 214; .3. . , 1997. . 14; .. // «-». 2005. 50. . 1, 8; .. ' // . 2006. 10. . 133; .. // . ., 1997. . 24--33. 38 ., . : : / . .. . ., 2007. . 62; .. 'II . 1 (2001). ., 2002..40 . .,:- .-,. : , ; -.,. ....4.'... ·-..*.'-·

15


, : ; ; ; . , , , -. . 54- 30 1998 . « » , . ", . . . , 42 . , , 43 . , , , « » 44, .
«». ., .: .. // . 2007. 1. . 156. 41 .. , // . 2006. 11 . . 9. 4 2 2- 5.02.2007 . 4 ; 3 .: .. // . 2006. 6. . 116--117. 44 .. / / . 2005. 3. . 4. 45 . : .. // . 2006. 2. . 18.
39 40

16

'

'

·.

:


4. . , . , . , , «» . , « » . . , -- (sui generis)49, -- 50, . . . , , . , .. ,

46 .: .. // . . -. . 11 . . 2004. 4. . 25. 47 ., . : .. // . 2004. 12 . . 4; .., .. // . . 1997. 3 . . 75; .. // . 2006. 1. . 22. 48 96700088-2. 491-IV 12.05.2004. 49 .: .. // . 2006. 11. . 31. .: .. // . 2006. 1. . 8. 51 .: .. // . 2006. . . 22--32.

2 , , 5

17


\
, 52. , 53. , , , 5 . , . , -, . , . . , , . , , , . , . 367 1864 . , , . , , . 1995--2002 . , 2002 . . «» , , , . : , -- 55. «» , ,
52 .: .. . ., 1997. . 189. 53 ( ) . ., 2001. 54 . ., 2004. 55 .: . . ., 2001. . 246--264; Calenk . Individualism versus Collectivism. Rotterdam, 1993.

18


. , , , . , , , 59. 60, . * /^ 61 . . , , , , , . ^ 62 63 . 1 ,
56 Dictionar y of the Socia l Scienc e / Ed. by G. Calhoun . 2000. P. 78; The Encyclopedia Americana. International edition. 1997. Vol. 7. P. 239; The New Encyclopaedia Britannica. 15th ed. L., 2002. Vol . 3. P. 453; 57 Dictionar y o f the Socia l Science , P . 228 ; The Encyclopedi a Americana . Vol . 15. P. 69; The New Encyclopaedia Britannica. P. 295. 58 Crittenden J. Beyon d Individualism . Reconstructin g the Libera l Self . Oxford , 1992. P. 77. 59 .: .-. . ., 2000. . 66--76; . . ., 2002. . 226--235; . . ., 1994. . 33--34, 74--77. 60 Cosentini F. La societe future , individualism e ou collectivisme ? P., 1905. 61 Maleshin D. Some Cultural Characteristic s of th e New Russia n Code of Civi l Procedure of 2002 // Zeitschrift fu r Zivilprozess International. 2005. N 10. P. 385--389. 62 ., .: : . : 3 . / . . ... . 3. ., 2002. . 333--349; .. // . . . 1989. 10; .. : , , // : . . . . , 2006. . 28--30 <· - > #*

19'


, . . , , . . . , « , , » . . . , , - . ,
Hendley . Rewritin g the Rules of the Game in Russia : The Neglected Issue of the Demand fo r Law // East European Constitutiona l Review.1999 . Vol . 8. P. 94; Idem. "Demand" fo r the Law in Russi a -- A Mixed Pictur e // Eas t European Constitutiona l Review. 2001. N 10. P. 72--77; Newcity M. Russia n Legal Traditio n and th e Rule of Law // The Rul e of La w and Economi c Refor m in Russi a / Ed. by J.D. Sachs, K. Pistor. Oxford , 1997. P. 41; . // . 2001 . 4. . 22. -- 64 . . . ., 1999. . 16. 65 Post R.C. Fashionin g th e Legal Constitution : Culture, Courts and Law // Harvard Law Review. 2003. Vol.117 . P. 52--56; 80--86; Adaptin g Legal Culture s / Ed. by D. Nelken, J. Feest. Oxford, 2001. P. 4. 66 Chase O.G. Law, Culture , and Ritual : Disputin g Systems i n Cross-Cultura l Context. N.Y. ; L., 2005; Idem. Cultur e and Disputing//Tulan e Journa l of Internationa l and Comparative Law. 1999. N7 . P. 81--90; Idem. Some Observation s on the Cultura l Dimensio n in Civi l Procedure Refor m / / America n Journa l o f Comparative Law. 1997. Vol.4 . N45 . P. 861--870; Taruffo M. Transcultural Dimension s of Civi l Justice // Comparative Law Review. 2000. N 23; Linblom H. Individua l Litigatio n and Mass Justice : A Swedis h Perspectiv e and Proposal s o n Group Action s i n Civi l Procedure / / America n Journa l o f Comparativ e ·Law. 1997. N45 . P. 805--831; James F., Hazard G.C., LeubsdorfJ. Op. cit . P. 309--310; Subrin S.N. Discovery in Globa l Perspective: Ar e We Nuts // DePaul Law Review. 2002. N 52. P. 312; Main .. Globa l Issues in Civi l Procedure. St. Paul , 2006. P. 5. (XII Word Congress on Procedural Law, Mexico, September 2003; Colloquium of the Internationa l Associatio n of Procedural Law, Tulane University, October 1998; Colloquiu m of the European Universit y Institute , Badia Fiesolana , May 1977).
63

:

20


, . , , . . , , . , 1864 . 68. 6 9 . , . . . , «» . . 90- . , « », 1995 . . , . , 2002 . , , .
Berman HJ. Op. cit. P. 216. ., -- 1877 ., -- 1895 ., -- 1911 . (. : .. . , 2003. . 25). 69 Cappdletti M. Social and Politica l Aspects . P. 875. 70 ., . : .. . . ., 1980. 71 Sypnowich . The Concept of Socialist Law. Oxford , 1990. P. 155.
61 68

2

!


, . , , . , , , , . - . . , , , , , «» . - , . . , , XIX . « » , . . . , . . (Woolf ) « » («litigation should be less adversarial»)73, « » («Future judge s wil l take advantage of the opportunity thus provide d to play a · more activ e role...» ) .
72

Jacob H. Courts , Law an d Politic s in Comparativ e Perspective . Oxford , 1996.

P. 4.
73 Woolf H . Acces s t o Justice . Fina l Report t o th e Lord Chancello r o n th e Civi l Justic e System in England and Wales . L., 1996. P. 5. 74 JolowiczJ.A. On Civi l Procedure. Cambr., 2000. P. 385.

22

" '-'

-,.-»,-.*..,-.

:

,>r%4*.

'

'

-

"-


, . , . . 78, . 30- . , 9 . ~ 80 , . , 1906 . (Roscoe Pound) . . « , » («The role of the judge should be made more central, as in the civil law system»82), -- (Hazard) (Taraffo). . 75 Andrews N. Principles of Civil Procedure. Oxford, 1994. P. 50; Zuckerman A.A. Civil Procedure. Oxford, 2003. P. 34; Grainger!., Pearly M., Spencer M. The Civil Procedural Rules in Action. L., 2000. P. 173. 76 Lounghlin P., Cerlis S. Civi l Litigation . L., 2004. P. 7. 77 Fiss O.M., Resnik J. Adjudicatio n and it s Alternatives . An Introductio n to Procedure. N.Y., 2003. P. 1151. 78 Reformin g the Civi l Justic e System / Ed. by L. Kramer. N.Y. ; L., 1996. 79 Resnik J . Failin g faith : Adjudicator y Procedure i n Declin e / / Universit y o f Chicago Law Review. 1986. Vol . 53/2. P. 494--560. 80 Resnik J. Procedure' s Project s // Civil Justice Quarterly. 2004. N 23. P. 273--308; Fiss O.M. The New Procedure // Revista Juridica de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. 1985. N 54. P. 129--144; Stiefel E.S., Maxeiner J.R. Civil Justice Reform in the United States -- Opportunity for Learning from «Civilized» European Procedure Instead of Continued Isolation? // American Journal of Comparative Law. 1994. N42 . P. 147--162; BurbankS.B., Silberman L.J. Civil Procedure Reform in Comparative Context: The United States of America // American Journal of Comparative Law. 1997. N 45. P. 675--704. 81 Pound R. The Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction wit h the Administration of Justice // Baylor Law review. 1956. N 8. P. 24--25. 82 Hazard C.C., Taruffo M. America n Civi l Procedure. An Introduction . Ne w Haven; L., 1993. P. 103. 83 Cains B. Australia n Civi l Procedure . Sydney, 2002. P. 37--38; Beyond the adversaria l system / Ed. by H. Stacy, M. Lavarch. Sydney, 1999. P. XI .

75

23


, . , , , , . , . . , . , . 1990--1991 . . 87 . - 90, ', , ". , 90- . , . 93, 94, -

AseinJ.O. Introductio n to Nigeria n Legal System. Badan, 1998. P. 7. Damaska M.R. Op. cit. P. 3. 86 Lemosse M. Cognitio . Etude su r le rol e d u jug e dan s 1'instuctio n du proces s civi l antique . P., 1944. P. 141. 87 Varano V . Civi l Procedura l Refor m i n Ital y / / America n Journa l o f Comparativ e Law. 1997. N45 . P. 659. 88 Gottwald P . Civi l Procedure Refor m i n German y / / America n Journa l o f Comparative Law. 1997. N45 . P. 760; Langbein J.H. The German advantage in civi l procedure// Universit y of Chicago Law Review. 1985. N 52. P. 826. 89 Asser W.D.H., Croen H.A., Vranken J.B.M., Tzankova IN. A New Balance . A Summary of the Interi m Repor t Fundamental Review of the Dutch Law of Civi l Procedure // Zeitschrift fu r Zivilprozess International. 2003. N 8. P. 328, 353. 90 Cadiet L. (Commentary) Code de procedur e civile . P., 1999. P. 13; Croze H., Morel C. Procedure civile . P., 1988. P. 21 ; Vincent}., GuinchardS. Procedure civile . P., 1987. P. 398; Heron J. Droit judiciar e prive . P., 2002. P. 264. 91 Meijer GJ. Belgia n Civi l Procedur e / / Acces s t o Civi l Procedur e Abroa d /Ed. b y H. J. Snijders . Alphen ; L., 1999. P. 216 . 92 Kuru ., Ansay ., Golcuklu F., Sensoy S.C. Law of Procedur e // Introductio n to Turkish Law. P. 185. 93 . 179 1998 . ( : 14 . 2006 . , 2006). 94 . 4 1952 . ( . 1996 .).
84 85

24


, , , . 99 . , . , , . , . , 1996 . 1998 ., 101 . 1991 . 102 . . (). « , - » . , . (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instances of the European Communities). , -

95

%

97

98

' . 4 1997 . ' . 66 1999 . 7 . 15 1964 . ( . 1998 .). ! . 49 1998 . . 14.2 . 100 . : Goodman C.F. Justice and Civi l Procedure in Japan . L., 2004. .: Brown R.C. Understandin g Chinese Courts and Legal Process: Law and Chines e Characteristics . L., 1997. P. 17. 101 Taniguchi Y. Op. cit . C. 775; Hattori ., Henderson D.F. Civi l Procedur e in Japan . N.Y. , 2002. P. 1--38. 102 Hsu B.F-C. The commo n la w syste m in Chines e context. N.Y. , 1992 . P. 41 ; Cohen J.A. Reformin g China' s Civi l Procedure: Judgin g the Courts // American Journa l of Comparative Law. 1997. N 45. P. 794. 103 Zimmermann R. Roma n Law, Contemporar y Law, Europea n Law. The Civilia n Tradition Today. Oxford, 2001. P. 114. 104 Procedura l Laws in Europe . Toward s harmonizatio n / Ed. by M. Storme. Antwerpen, 2003. P. 64--65.

25


. «|05 », . , . 6 , . .

. , . - «» . . , . , .

"

105 Lenaerts ., Arts D., Bray R. Procedura l Law of the Europea n Union . Andover , 1999. P. 381-- 382. 106 Hay B.L., Spier K.E. Burdens of Proo f in Civi l Litigation : An Economic Perspectiv e // Journa l of Legal Studies. 1997. N 26. P. 413--431.

17.05.07