Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.ipib.msu.ru/UserFiles/File/spconf2010/talks/requena.doc Дата изменения: Mon Apr 2 16:24:21 2012 Дата индексирования: Mon Oct 1 20:51:34 2012 Кодировка:

COUNCIL |CONSEIL | |
|OF |DE |
|EUROPE |L'EUROP|
| |E |


The Sixth International Conference «Scientific Issues in Security and
Combating Terrorism», Moscow, 11 - 12th of November, 2010

The Council of Europe approach to the international information security in
the context of the fight against terrorism


Ms. Marta Requena, Head of the Public International Law and Anti-
Terrorism Division Head of the Counter Terrorism Task Force, Council
of Europe




Ladies and Gentlemen,


it is a pleasure for me to represent the Council of Europe at this event
and I would like to express my gratitude to the organisers, for giving our
Organisation an opportunity to present the Council of Europe's approach to
the international information security in the context of the fight against
terrorism.


The subject matter of this Conference is of upmost importance, as due
to the fast technological evolution of our world terrorist activities are
dependant on modern information technologies, particularly new media.


Indeed, terrorism is constantly evolving threat capable of adapting
and using the fast developing technologies of our modern world. Terrorist
cells take advantage of the high and rapid spread of information. Thus, our
cooperative efforts against this threat should be able to match and
outmatch it in the technological field.
The Council of Europe's contribution to the fight against terrorism in
this field is done on a ideological level. Our Organisation contribute to
the successful strategies, effective policies and best practices in the
prevention of terrorism, including in the field of information security.

* In this respect, the Council of Europe was the first international
Organisation to criminalise the provocation to commit terrorist
offence and glorification of terrorism.

* The Council of Europe is also instrumental in pro-actively promoting a
counter message to hate speech.

* Finally the Council has also focused on the particular and ever
expanding media that can be used for such provocation: the Internet.


Let's me briefly present our work in this field.


1. Criminalisation of public provocation to commit terrorist offence:


The best way to prevent terrorism is to prevent its encouragement. In
order to facilitate the co-operation between States in this field the
Council of Europe elaborated the Council of Europe Convention on the
Prevention of Terrorism.


This Convention was adopted in 2005 and at present the Convention has
been already ratified by 26 European States and 17 further Council of
Europe member States signed it.


The Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism is not
restricted to the member States of the Council of Europe; non-member States
have also the possibility to become a Party to this Convention.
I am happy to say that the Russian Federation was the first State to
ratify this important instrument.


The Convention focuses on public expressions of support for terrorist
offences and/or groups; causality links - direct or indirect - with the
perpetration of a terrorist offence; and temporal connections - ex ante or
ex post - with the perpetration of a terrorist offence.


This Convention is the first international instrument to provide a
definition of a public provocation to commit a terrorist offence and its
article 5 defines public provocation to commit a terrorist offence as "the
distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public,
with the intent to incite the commission of a terrorist offence, where such
conduct, whether or not directly advocating terrorist offences, causes a
danger that one or more such offences may be committed."


The term "distribution" refers to the active dissemination of a
message advocating terrorism, while the expression "making available"
refers to providing that message in a way that is easily accessible to the
public. It covers, for instance, by placing message on the Internet or by
creating or compiling hyperlinks in order to facilitate access to it.


The Council of Europe Convention not only criminalise the public
provocation to commit a terrorist act, but also contains several provisions
reinforcing co-operation at national and international level regarding this
offence, including grounds for refusal of extradition and mutual
assistance.


We believe that this tool is important for our member States in their
fight against terrorism propaganda and spread of message advocating and
glorifying terrorism.
However, the point I really have to reiterate and underline in this
respect, is that the Convention never loses sight of the indispensable
balance in respect of guaranteed fundamental freedoms. For this reason
Article 5 (as well as the other new crimes) must always be interpreted in
conjunction with Article 12 on Conditions and safeguards which is another
core provision of the Convention.


From the Council of Europe's point of view, the need to strike this
balance between efficient criminalisation of public provocation to commit
a terrorist offence and freedom of expression is indispensable.


In fact, for our Organisation the measures to ensure respect for
human rights for all and the rule of law as the fundamental basis of the
fight against terrorism are the most vital ones, as they touch upon the
reason for the existence of our Organisation.


This stand reflected in the Council of Europe Convention on the
Prevention of Terrorism goes in line with all previous standards-setting
activities of our Organisation. Similar approach was taken, for example, in
2002 when the ' Council of Europe Committee Ministers - the Organisation's
main decision making body of - adopted the Guidelines on human hghts and
fight against terrorism.


This approach is based on and further developed in the case-law of
the European Court on Human Rights which helps to establish a constant and
evolutive interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights and
Council of Europe legal framework.


The 2008 judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case
of Leroy v. France (2008), the leading case with respect of glorification
of terrorism, considers in particular the issues of duties and
responsibilities,, proportionality and the need for State intervention in
the area of the freedom of expression, in the case of a message advocating
terrorism.


2. Promoting a counter message to hate speech


The Council of Europe not only seeks to disrupt any messages
advocating terrorism, all the while avoiding unnecessary restrictions of
freedom of expression. It also aims to actively promote of a counter
narrative to hate speech.


The Council uses a number of instruments and activities that aim to
promote multiculturalism, integration and tolerance. The main objective
being to weaken the sources of discontent that may fuel terrorism. To
accomplish this goal, the Council of Europe, through its standard-setting
and technical cooperation activities, is actively involved in education,
youth and the media. The Council of Europe also works to discourage any
stigmatisation, discrimination and intolerance in its member states. Our
organisation also encourages inter-cultural dialogue and understanding.
Finally the Council encourages the integration of migrants within the
society of its member states.


Several examples illustrate the work of the Council in the field. The
work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) is
one of these with its recommendations, inter alia, on combating intolerance
and discrimination against Muslims and on combating racism while fighting
terrorism. Another specific example is the Council of Europe's White Paper
on inter-cultural dialogue, which is being actively implemented, after a
large-scale consultation process between state and non-state actors.


More specifically in the field of media and new media, the Council of
Europe seeks to guide States in their attitude towards freedom of
expression in times of crisis[1]. It also seeks to discourage any
stigmatisation or alienation of various social groups in the media or
political spheres. The Declaration on freedom of expression and information
in the media in the context of the fight against terrorism stressed the
importance of self-regulation, editorial responsibility and the significant
role the media can play in preventing "hate speech" and incitement to
violence.


3. Use of internet for terrorist purposes:


However, our Organisation is fully aware that there is one area where
the issue of self-regulation and editorial responsibility for the
information is particularly vital. This area is the Internet, with which
information flows with ease around the world.


First and foremost let me say that while we discuss the risks
associated with the use of the Internet, we should never forget that it
benefits society. I must underline that the Internet has proven an
overwhelmingly beneficial development for modern society precisely for the
way in which it has revolutionised the dissemination of ideas and
information. The internet, being mostly user generated, may only be
regulated efficiently by an efficient user control.


In the context of the terrorism, these positive aspects may be abused,
as terrorist groups and their supporters have taken advantage of the
anonymity and wide reach of the Internet to exploit it for these purposes.


Internet is a potential tool for terrorist cells to use to spread
their message and as a recruiting tool. As an added difficulty the
Internet's anonymity has complicated governments' ability to track and stop
terrorist activities on-line.



The Council of Europe frameworks takes into account these new
challenges, the Council of Europe adopted the Convention on Cybercrime
(2001) and its Protocol on Xenophobia and Racism (2003) are good examples
of this. The protocol to the Convention on Xenophobia and Racism to the
Convention (2003) is of particular interest since it concerns abuses of
freedom of expression through computer systems. It calls on the parties to
establish as criminal offences under domestic law acts of distributing
racist and xenophobic materials through computer systems, in this way
reinforcing the preventive aspect of the fight against terrorism via the
fight against cybercrime.


With regard to the said use of internet by terrorist groups, it must be
underlined that solutions to these issues are often of a technical nature.
The most important aspect of the Council of Europe's contribution in this
field is to encourage cooperation between all concerned parties and
encourage the sharing of good ideas and practices.


And I would like to conclude my presentation with this message of the
importance of cooperation in our efforts to fight against terrorism.


We should all work together towards promoting the free flow of
information and its free access by all. However, we should do our utmost to
ensure that the freedom of information is not abused. As terrorism is one
of the crimes which can be committed with the use of information
technologies we should all be aware of the danger this poses.

States certainly remain the principle actors of the fight against
terrorism. However, given the nature of modern information technologies,
efficient prevention of terrorism in this field requires a certain level of
coordination of all States authorities and also their cooperation with
civil society. The latest in its turn should also prone raising awareness
and self-regulation.


International organisations - such as the Council of Europe - provide
an important place for facilitating cooperation among States and setting up
legal framework, recommendations and guidelines encouraging such
cooperation between States. International organisations serve also as an
extended international forums enabling interaction with various civil
society participants, especially when the relations with mass media sector
are concerned.


The future lays in the co-operation on all levels. And while co-
operating our approach must strike a fair balance between individual rights
and the interests of society, a delicate balance but a fundamental one, in
times of the dИstabilisation of the State by terrorist acts.


Thank you for your attention.


-----------------------

[1] Guidelines of the Council of Europe on the freedom of expression in
times of crisis (2008).