Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес
оригинального документа
: http://theory.sinp.msu.ru/comphep_html/tutorial/node118.html
Дата изменения: Wed Aug 16 11:35:01 2000 Дата индексирования: Mon Oct 1 22:54:26 2012 Кодировка: |
Cancellation of diagram contributions is an essential point both for symbolic and numerical processing, because a relatively small variation of one diagram contribution may lead to a significant error. Such variation can be caused either by finite precision of floating operations or by correction of Feynman rules, for instance, by including particle widths into consideration, or by removal of some diagram subset. We would like to stress again these obstacles to warn the user.
There are two well known examples of gauge cancellations. The first one is the ultraviolet cancellation of terms originating from the propagators of massive vector particles. This problem could be resolved by the calculation of squared matrix element in the t'Hooft - Feynman gauge.
The second example is the cancelation of double pole
terms of t-channel photon
propagator. There is a wide class of processes where the incoming
electron goes out in the forward direction emitting a virtual photon
like in Fig.
. The corresponding
diagrams have got the
pole, where
is the squared momentum of the virtual
photon. For the above kinematics the photon appears very close to its
mass shell (
), hence
this configuration gives a large contribution to the cross section.
For the squared matrix element we expect the pole,
but it appears to be reduced
up to
pole [Budnev-1975] in the zero-electron-mass limit.
This fact is caused by electro-magnetic U(1) gauge invariance.
If diagrams of Fig.
type contribute to your process, we
strongly recommend to
to set the 'Gauge invariance' switch
ON (see Section
) to prevent the gauge symmetry
breaking by width terms.
Another way to solve this problem is the usage of the Weizsaecker-Williams
approximation (see Section
).