Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://srd.sinp.msu.ru/nymmik/models/bazilevskaya_2.pdf Дата изменения: Fri Jan 26 21:10:41 2007 Дата индексирования: Mon Oct 1 19:12:56 2012 Кодировка:

Template for comments and secretariat observations
1 MB1 2 Clause No./ Subclause No./ Annex (e.g. 3.1) (3) Paragraph/ Figure/Table/ Note (e.g. Table 1) 4 Type of comment2 5 Comment (justification for change) by the MB

Date:
(6)

Document:
(7) Secretariat observations on each comment submitted

Proposed change by the MB

RU RU RU RU

2 2 2 2

Row 2 Row 4 Row 4 Row 5

ed ed ed te

SEPs are not fluxes , but particles It is desirable to add that Wolf number is also known as the sunspot number. The coefficient (k) adjusting various observation conditions should be introduced in the formula " Mean months smoothed sunspot number" has no sense if periods of observation and smoothing are not given. It would be e.g., "11- month smoothed daily sunspot number" or "11-point smoothed monthly averaged sunspot number". "SEP particle" is simply SEP "F" should not be bold The printers error (author) F30 is the fluence rather than proton number. If you give F30 definition, why there is no f30 definition?

High-energy (4 MeV ) charged particle of solar origin Wolf or sunspot number W=k(10g+f) .............k is the coefficient adjusting various observation conditions. 13-month smoothed month sunspot number or predicted by NOAA month sunspot number: by INTERNET http://www.sec.noaa.gov/Data/ "....SEP peak flux...." "F(E)" ....that traverse a unit area from all directions (from solid angle 4 [particle/cm2] The 30 MeV proton fluence of SEP event or number of SEP events

CLOSED: Accepted and implemented CLOSED: Accepted and implemented CLOSED: Accepted and implemented CLOSED: Accepted in modified form

RU RU RU RU

2 2 2 2

Row 6 Rows 9 and 11 Row 9 Row 12

ed ed ed ge

CLOSED: Accepted and implemented CLOSED: Accepted and implemented CLOSED: technical error is corrected

RU

2

Row 12

ge

F30 is defined as the SEP event size. There should not be two or more different sizes of the same thing. ........time through unit solid angle [proton/cm2·sr·s]. The fluxes of protons with different energy reach maximum values at different times. Probability for a given fluence of SEPs with

CLOSED: not accepted

RU

2

Row 13

"Time-maximum number " is not a clear definition. It is desirable mention here that fluxes of protons with different energy reach maximum values at different times.

CLOSED: Accepted and implemented in modified form CLOSED: Accepted and

RU

2

Row 16

. "SEP fluence of energy" = Fluence of SEPs with

1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. page 1 of 3 ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10


Template for comments and secretariat observations
1 MB1 2 Clause No./ Subclause No./ Annex (e.g. 3.1) (3) Paragraph/ Figure/Table/ Note (e.g. Table 1) 4 Type of comment2 5 Comment (justification for change) by the MB

Date:
(6)

Document:
(7) Secretariat observations on each comment submitted

Proposed change by the MB

RU RU

2 2

Table Table

energy E to be exceeded. energy. Such expressions can be misunderstood. There are similar ambiguous expressions in both TS and Memorandum. The format of Table should be uniform. Now, "particle" and "proton" are used mixed.

implemented

CLOSED: Accepted and implemented CLOSED: Accepted and implemented

Value dimensions should be in the same column (it is usually in the 4th column, but in the 2nd column of Row 12).
It seems reasonable to give the "Flux" definition before the "Fluence" definition All TS is formed in logical ­ Fluence ­first and Peak flux ­ afterwards. Therefore it is not reasonable to change this consistent in the Table

RU

2

Table

CLOSED: not accepted

RU

Eq. (2b)

Numerical values in Expression should be the P.31 of the Memorandum was erroneous and was corrected same as on p. 31 of the Memorandum.
Expression =10A-1 does not agree with A=+1. With A=+1 agree the expression =10A-1 (8a)

CLOSED: Eq. 2.b was not changed CLOSED: Accepted and implemented CLOSED: Accepted.

RU RU

Eq. (8a) Eq. (11)

"n" is missed in the exponent.
ed

RU

Paragraph 4.2.7.1. (p.10).

According be within expression expression

to given expression, 200 bins would This and the next referees remarks are caused by CLOSED: Accepted and each order of magnitude! The the inaccurate formulation of the paragraphs paragraphs 4.2.7.2-4.2.7.4 should be replaced by 100.1*j or by 4.2.7.1-4.2.7.4. of the TS. In the corrected version are re-formed. of the technical specification ISOTS#04 (from (4.14) of the Memorandum. October 10 2004) these paragraphs are re-formed.
CLOSED: Accepted and paragraphs 4.2.7.2-4.2.7.4 are re-formed (see ISOTC#04)
Text is fully checked and the mistakes are corrected. The indexes in Memorandum are CLOSED: Accepted.

RU

Paragraph 4.2.7.3. (p.10)

ed

is missing something. It is not possible to understand the sense.

RU

ed

Symbols and indices are not always explained. Sometimes, there is confusion e.g., p or , k or i.

1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. page 2 of 3 ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10


Template for comments and secretariat observations
1 MB1 2 Clause No./ Subclause No./ Annex (e.g. 3.1) (3) Paragraph/ Figure/Table/ Note (e.g. Table 1) 4 Type of comment2 5 Comment (justification for change) by the MB

Date:
(6)

Document:
(7) Secretariat observations on each comment submitted

Proposed change by the MB

conduced to accordance. RU RU Be ed Numeration of paragraphs is violated (3.7 is missed, 4.2.5. is triplicated etc.). It seems that a misprint is in Table 1 for =2, p=0.5. CLOSED: Accepted. CLOSED: Accepted.

1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. page 3 of 3 ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10