Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://chem.msu.ru/rus/journals/membranes/21/html/mb_211.pdf Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Mon Feb 13 17:55:46 2006 Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Mon Apr 11 05:33:04 2016 Êîäèðîâêà:

.. , .. , .. «»
*)

*)

. ­ . . . . , . . ( ) . : , , , , , . The biofouling problems in reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration elements are considered. The experimental technique to calculate two main stages of biofilm development during adhesion phase and phase of biological growth was suggested. An influence of inhibitor dosing on intensity of membrane biofouling was investigated. Based on obtained data the prognosis for point-of-use reverse osmosis element applied on tap water was done. The estimation of biocide treatment on membrane performance efficiency was carried out. The features of biomass accumulation and growth in ultrafiltration elements, using for surface water treatment was considered. An example of membrane unit operation prognosis in presence of biofouling was shown. Prediction a possibility of membrane biofouling with the help of suggested techniques enables us to carry out a preliminary calculation of technological operational analysis (including chemical washing with biocide chemicals) of membrane facilities for given conditions. Keywords: reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, biofouling, biofilm, prediction of product flow decrease, removal of foulants.

. , . , , . , , ,

. , 30-50% , ­ , ( Pseudomonas, Corynebacterium, Bacillus .), (Penicillium, Trichoderma, Mucor, Fusarium, Aspergillus) [1]. , , . 3

. . , 2004, 1 (21)




. . «» . , . , , . , , . , , , . . [2]. , [2, 3]. , «» . : , [4]. . . 4

, , , , , , [5 ­ 7]. . - , . . , , , , . , , : . [8] , : , . [5 ­ 7, 9]. . . , . , . ­ -

. . , 2004, 1 (21)


. . , . . , . .

, . -, , , - , -, , , , . , , . , , . . . , , [8, 9]. , , , - . . , -

( , ). , . . , . . 1. 1.1. (. 1): 1) , ; 2) ­ ; 3) ; 4) . ­ , . , , , , , . [10, 11]. , , . , 5

. 1. .

. . , 2004, 1 (21)




. 2. :
1 2 3 4 ­ ­ ­ ­ , , ,

(. 2). , , . , . (. 3).

. 3 ( ) . , , (. 3). , . 3, . . 3. ( , ..) . , . 1.2. , , ( ),

. 3. : )
; ) ; ), ) c ; ) : 1, 2 3 ­ .

6

. . , 2004, 1 (21)


. . , . . , . .

( ) . , . , . , , , . , . , [12 ­ 13] , . [4] , ( , «» 1). : , , . ( ) . , , . , «» . . 3. ( - ) ( ) ,

. . , , , . 3, . , . 1.3. , , , . , ( ) . . , , . , (. 4). , , ( ). , . , . (. 5). 1.4. , , 7

. . , 2004, 1 (21)




. (. 3 4). , , . (. 6). . 4. : ) ; ) ; ) ; ) : 1, 2 3 ­ , . , . , ( - . , ..). , - . 2. 2.1. . , . . -45-350 ( ­ 2012, ­ 0,5 2) 0,5 . ; , ,
. . , 2004, 1 (21)

. 5. . 8


. . , . . , . .

. 6. () (). 109 1 . . 7. . Pseudomonas Auorescens, . , 80% , . , , . 10 Pseudomonas fluorescens 1 12- . . . ( . 8). , 23 . 2.2. , , : , 1 /; , 1 /; , 1 /. , . , .. . 9

. 7.
. . . , 2004, 1 (21)




. , . , . . 10. . 2.3. , () . 5-10 /. , , . «», , . «» 20 /. . 10 . 160 000 . 2.4. , . , . . , 2004, 1 (21)

. 8.


560 . . . . 9 -

. 9.
.

10


. . , . . , . .

. 10.
( ).

. , , «» , , , , . (). «» . «» , , 6 / 3,5 / ( 0,5 ). 0,5%- «», 2- . . . . . 9 , -

. , , . . , , . . . 11. 2%- . . . 11 . 3. 3.1. Pseudomonas fluorescens . ,

. 11.
.

. . , 2004, 1 (21)

11




, , . . . , , , . , , , , 2­3 . , ( ), ( 5 ). , , , ( ). , , , . , , . , 12

. 12.
.

. , «» , «» , . 3.2. . 12. , (. 13). . 13, , , , : - ( ), . -, , ,

. . , 2004, 1 (21)


. . , . . , . .

. 13. : ) ; ) ( ­ 1,2 /). . , , (. 14 ­ 17). . 16 17 , , ­ «-

. 15. : ) ; ) .

. 16. » 10 20 /. , , 10. , , . , , , 105, 13

. 14. .

. . , 2004, 1 (21)




. 17.
.

. , . , , , , , . 4. 4.1. . , , , . : , . , ( , .), 14

. , , . , . . , . , , , , , , , - . « », , , . , , , , . -, , , [1]. , . . -, , , . -,

. . , 2004, 1 (21)


. . , . . , . .

, , [1], , . , . , : ( ) . , [14, 15]. , . , ­ . , . . 9 . . (1 ) «» (, 100 /). , , ­ [16]. , , , , 100% . [17]

, . , . 12 ­ 13. Ultrasil U53 [3]. : , ( ) . 4.2. . . . 18. , . , . , -

. 18. 1­ 2­ 4­ 5­ 6­ : , , 3 ­ , ; ; .

. . , 2004, 1 (21)

15




. 19.
.

. , , , , . , , , ( ). . . 19. , -

. ( , ) . . 20 , ­ . 4.3.

, (. 21). :

J=

P µ ( Rm + R + R



+R



)

,

P ­ , Rm ­ , R ­ , R ­ , R ­ . . 22 . [18, 19] (. 23). , . . 20.
, ­ .

16

. . , 2004, 1 (21)


. . , . . , . .


, . . , ( ), . . , , , . , , . . , . , . . , . , , . . 17

. 21. ­

. 22.
, , .

. 23. :
) )

. . , 2004, 1 (21)




( ) . : ; , . . . . ., . . . . . .
1. 2. Baker J.S., Dudley L.Y. Biofouling in membrane systems ­ A review. // Desalination. 1998. V. 118, p. 81-90. Flemming H.-C., Schaule G., Griebe T., Schmitt J., Tamachkiarowa A. Biofouling ­ the Achilles heel of membrane processes. // Desalination. 1997. V. 113, p.215-225. Zahir A., editor. Reverse osmosis: membrane technology, water chemistry and industrial applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993. Flemming H.-C. Reverse Osmosis Membrane Biofouling. // Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 1997. V. 14, p. 382-391. Applegate L.E., Erkenbrecher C. W. Monitoring and control of biological activity in Permasep seawater RO. // Desalination. 1987. V. 65, p. 331 ­ 359.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

3.

18.

4.

5.

19.

Ridgway H.F., Rigly M. G., Argo D.J. Bacteria adhesion and fouling of reverse osmosis membranes. // Journal AWWA, July 1986, p. 97 ­ 106. Ridgway H.F. et al. Biofilm fouling of RO membranes ­ its nature and effect on treatment of water for reuse. // Journal AWWA, June 1984, p. 94 ­101. Winters H. et al. Control of biological fouling in seawater reverse osmosis desalination. // Desalination. 1983. V. 47, p. 233 ­ 238. Bettinger G. E. Controlling biological activity in a surface water reverse osmosis plant. // Desalination. 1983. V. 38, p. 419 ­ 424. Pervov A.G., Telitchenko M.M. Prediction of biological growth in RO systems and its influence on membrane performance. // Desalination. 1996. V. 105, p.173. Pervov A.G. A simplified RO process design based on understanding of fouling mechanisms. // Desalination. 1999. V. 126, p. 227-247. Flemming H.-C., Schaule G. How do performance parameters respond to initial biofouling of membranes? // Fourth national Meeting of the NAMS, San Diego, California, 1991, May 29 ­31, 15 B. Flemming H.-C., Schaule G. Biofouling on membranes ­ a microbiological approach. // Desalination. 1988. V. 70, p. 96 ­ 119. Lipp P., Baldauf G., Schick R., Elsenhans K., Stabel H.H. Integration of ultrafiltration to conventional drinking water treatment for a better particle removal ­ efficiency and costs? // Desalination. 1998. V. 119, p. 133-142. Wilf I. New membrane research and development achievements. // Desalination and Water Reuse. 2001. V. 10/1, p. 28-33. Flemming H. C., Schaule G., Investigation on biofouling of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membranes. Part 2, Analysis and removal of surface films. Vom Wasser 73, 1989, p.287-301. Pasmore M., Todd P., Smith S., Baker D., Silverstein J., Coons D., Bowman C.N. Effects of ultrafiltration membrane surface properties on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm initiation for the purpose of reducing biofouling. // J. Membrane Science. 2002. V. 194, p. 15-32. .., .. . // . . 2003. 2 (18). .., .. . // . . 2003. 6, .7-9.

18

. . , 2004, 1 (21)