Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~uochep/talks/talks03/charge.pdf Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Mon Jun 30 22:13:59 2003 Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Tue Oct 2 10:21:45 2012 Êîäèðîâêà:

Charge to the Workshop (and News)
Jim Brau January 9, 2003

· ALCPG Organization · Recent activities and news · Future plans

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

1


Charge to the Workshop
· Review our recent progress · Organize our plans for future work

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

2


Organization of the Physics and Detectors Studies
· Mark Oreglia and I are co-chairing ALCPG Executive Ctte: ­ ­ ­ ­ Ed Blucher (Chicago) Lawrence Gibbons (Cornell) Young-Kee Kim (Berkeley) Rick Van Kooten (Indiana) Dave Gerdes (Michigan) Dean Karlen (Victoria) Jeff Richman (UCSB) Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley)

· Executive committee providing overall advice, and support for general studies

· Working Groups organized around physics and detector topics
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

3


Working Groups
http:blueox.uoregon.edu/~lc/alcpg Detector and Physics Simulations: Vertex Detector: Tracking: Particle I.D.: Calorimetry: Muon Detector : DAcq, Magnet, and Infrastructure: Interaction Regions, Backgrounds: IP Beam Instrumentation: LHC/LC Study Group Higgs: SUSY: New Physics at the TeV Scale and Beyond: Radiative Corrections (Loopverein): Top Physics, QCD, and Two Photon : Precision Electroweak: gamma-gamma, e-gamma Options: e-e-: Liaison to accel. R&D Global Detector Network Testbeams
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

UCLC and LCRD

4


Working Group Leaders
http:blueox.uoregon.edu/~lc/alcpg Co-chairs: Jim Brau and Mark Oreglia Higgs: Detector and Physics Simulations: R. Van Kooten/M. Carena/H. Haber N. Graf /M. Peskin SUSY: Vertex Detector: U. Nauenberg/J. Feng /F. Paige J. Brau /N. Roe New Physics at the TeV Scale and Beyond: Tracking: J. Hewett/D. Strom/S. Tkaczyk B. Schumm/D. Karlen/K. Riles Radiative Corrections (Loopverein): Particle I.D.: U. Baur/S. Dawson/D. Wackeroth B. Wilson Top Physics, QCD, and Two Photon : Calorimetry: Lynne Orr/Dave Gerdes R. Frey/A. Turcot/D. Chakraborty Precision Electroweak: Muon Detector : Graham Wilson/Bill Marciano G. Fisk DAcq, Magnet, and Infrastructure: gamma-gamma, e-gamma Options: (inactive) Jeff Gronberg/Mayda Velasco Interaction Regions, Backgrounds: e-e-: UCLC and LCRD T. Markiewicz/S. Hertzbach D. Amidei, G. Dugan, Clem Heusch G. Gollin, J. Jaros, IP Beam Instrumentation: Liaison to accel. R&D A. Kronfeld, U. Mallik, M. Woods /E. Torrence/D. Cinabro T. Himel, D. Finley , J. Rogers R. Patterson, J. Rogers LHC/LC Study Group Global Detector Network Testbeams - chaired by H. Schellman/F. Paige M. Hildreth /R. Van Kooten G. Fisk
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

5


Meetings and Workshops since Spring 2002
· Regional R&D Meetings
Fermilab (Apr 5) Cornell (Apr 19) SLAC (May 31)

· · · · ·

LoopVerein IP Beam Inst. ALCPG LCDsoft collider workshop · LHC/LC · ALCPG

BNL SLAC Santa Cruz NIU SLAC Fermilab UT-Arlington

May 9-10 June 26 June 27-29 Nov 7-9 Nov 21-22 Dec 12-13 Jan 9-11
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

6


LCDsoft

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

7


Linear Collider R&D Proposals
· Last spring, following the release of the HEPAP report, the US community began developing plans for an invigorated R&D program and proposals to the funding agencies · Organizational meetings were held at Fermilab, Cornell, and SLAC
­ ALCPG working groups led discussions on R&D opportunities ­ eventually the DOE groups consolidated into the LCRD and the NSF groups into the UCLC

· The US Linear Collider Steering Group developed a plan on how to deal with these proposals:
­ create a review committee ­ have the proposals reviewed at the project level

· The funding agencies responded to the ground-swell of interest within the community and developed a plan for the scope of the program
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

8


Linear Collider Accelerator R&D
· Many in the American university community expressed their interested in linear collider accelerator R&D · In response to this, the LC accelerator physicists prepared a list of R&D projects and the community developed proposals to address some
http://www-conf.slac.stanford. edu/lcprojectlist/projectlist/intro.htm

· 33 accelerator project proposals were submitted as part of the final University Program proposal on October 24
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

9


The Internal Review and Proposal Development
· At the Santa Cruz ALCPG meeting in June there was much discussion on how to proceed to proposals · Coming out of that meeting, there was an agreement from both the NSF(UCLC) and DOE(LCRD) groups to ­ submit Expressions of Interest by August 1 ­ Expressions of Interest were reviewed by the ALCPG working group leaders by August 6, providing criticism and recommended revisions ­ Proposals were collected by September 3 · The LCRD and the UCLC joined into a single national coordinated document to the US LC Steering Group
­ LCRD: D. Amidei, G. Gollin, J. Jaros, A. Kronfeld, U. Mallik ­ UCLC: R. Patterson, J. Rogers, G. Dugan
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

10


US R&D Proposals
· The single, combined proposal which was developed over the summer became:
A University Program of Accelerator and Detector Research for the Linear Collider

­ about 2 M$ first year (increasing in subsequent years) ­ very strong accelerator R&D component
· (roughly 1/2 of total funding)

· International Detector R&D Committee report provided guidance for detector projects
· http://blueox.uoregon.edu /~lc/randd.html

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

11


LC R&D Review Committees
· Detector Committee
­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

established by USLCSG

Howard Gordon, Brookhaven (chair) Rolf Heuer , U. Hamburg Steve Olsen, U. Hawaii Both committees met Mike Roney, U. Victoria at Fermilab Sep 9-10 Sally Seidel , U. New Mexico in separate sessions Hitoshi Yamamoto, Tohoku U. Norbert Holtkamp, ORNL (chair) Phil Burrows, Oxford Jean Delayen ,, JLab Tom Himel, SLAC Hugh Montgomery, Fermilab Katsunobu Oide, , KEK

· Accelerator Committee

to review the respective proposals.

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

12


(for the Detector Review Team)
The success of the Linear Collider physics program depends on optimizing the accelerator technology, and capitalizing with optimal detectors on the opportunity afforded by machine performance. While much progress in detector development has been made in recent years, especially through R&D for the LHC, different optimizations are needed for the Linear Collider experiments. There is time now to develop these technologies, and to discover and pursue new ideas which can further enhance the physics reach. With this in mind, the Linear Collider R&D Review Committee is charged to * Prioritize the elements of the proposals in the light of the R&D needs of the worldwide linear collider effort. Considerations entering into the prioritization should include the relevance and importance of the work to the perceived needs of the Linear Collider detectors, the lead-time requirements for the proposed R&D, and the experience and track record of the proposers . Novel ideas which have potential to impact the detector designs significantly should be identified with favor. * Co-ordinate the elements of the proposals by identifying areas of overlap, within a single consortium proposal, between the proposals, and within the international R&D program. Suggest possible realignments of the efforts which would eliminate unnecessary redundancy. The committee should refer to the document "Linear Collider Detector R&D" by the international linear collider detector R&D committee chaired by R. Heuer.
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

The Charge

13


(for the Detector Review Team)
There is additional guidance (besides the charge) from the Steering Group on what they would like coming from this review. They would like you to provide: 1.) a rating for each proposal (e.g. excellent, good, satisfactory, or poor) based on factors such as clarity of goals, feasibility, strength of the participants, etc; 2.) a categorization of the relevance of each proposal (e.g. critical R&D, important R&D, useful R&D, or irrelevant); 3.) and a rank-ordering of the proposals. This rank-ordering likely will be a grouping of the proposals into tiers (e.g. first priority, second priority, defer, or drop). You may need to indicate why you recommend to drop a proposal, but everyone recognizes you will not have time to write much verbiage. Please keep an eye on the total cost of the proposals. The budgets are not certain, but the guidance is that the Funding Agencies will try to provide a growing total of approximately 1M$ in FY03, 2M$ in FY04, and 3M$ in FY05 for university-based detector R&D. You will not need to worry about whether the funds are DOE or NSF. So for example, the first tier would be a mixture of "excellent" and "good" proposals that sum to approximately 1M$ in FY03 and are aimed at "critical", "important", or "useful" R&D goals. Since the funding is uncertain, the second tier will also be important, and should not consist of just every proposal that does not make it into the first tier.
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

Further Guidance

14


A University Program of Accelerator and Detector Research for the Linear Collider
2002 Proposal
Proposed Budget No. projects

Accelerator Physics $1,003,783 Luminosity, Energy, Polarization $171,541 Vertex Detector $119,100 Tracking $395,662 Calorimetry $514,540 Muon system and Particle ID $148,899 TOTAL $2,353,525

33 9 3 11 12 3 71

http://www. hep.uiuc .edu /LCRD/html_files/proposal.html

Proposal submitted to DOE and NSF October 24 We are eager to hear of action from the agencies: Saturday afternoon reports from agencies In addition strong R&D effort continues in Canada
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

15


IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Portland, Oregon Oct 19-24, 2003
· The IEEE is a good venue to report our R&D · Conference series with long tradition for reports on high energy physics instrumentation · papers published in IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Science

· Abstract and summaries for October meeting due May 16, 2003
http://www.nss-mic.org/2003/nsshome2003.html
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

16


Test Beams
· The Detector R&D will require test beams as we move ahead · The Working Groups are discussing the needs and available beams for detector tests · This is an issue of interest to the world-wide community · There will be a general discussion of this topic on Friday at 5 pm, led by Gene Fisk and the WG leaders

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

17


LC Scope
What are the requirements of the LC to do the physics? · Two activities in progress ­ (1) WW Study Organizing Committee · draft document of Grannis, Komamiya, Matsui, Richard (to be signed by WW community) · http://sbhep1.physics.sunysb.edu/~grannis/wwlc _report.html
­ this page is linked to the ALCPG web page

· David Miller will lead a discussion of this on Friday at 4 pm
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

18


LC Scope
· Two activities in progress ­ (2) The ALCPG Executive Committee is preparing a document detailing the required parameters of the linear collider
­ Design Considerations for an International Linear Collider ­ Ed. board: Mark Oreglia (chair), Jim Brau, Lawrence Gibbons, Young-Kee Kim, Hitoshi Murayama

· This was requested by the USLCSG · More detailed with respect to parameters than the WW study · Mark Oreglia will discuss this more on Saturday afternoon
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

19


Design Considerations for an International Linear Collider OUTLINE
Physics Goals Initial Machine Energy and Luminosity Beam Polarization Interaction Point Configuration crossing angle, number of collision halls How Machine Parameters Impact Detector Function beam bunch structure and timing beamstrahlung Running at the Z Resonance Energy Upgrade Study requested by USLCSG Collision Options Draft available soon
See Mark's talk Saturday
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

20


The LHC/LC Study Group
· ECFA/DESY Study established study group · The aim of the LHC / LC Study Group is to investigate how analyses at the LHC could profit from results obtained at a LC and vice versa. It is furthermore studied how informations obtained at both machines can most effectively be put together in order to explore the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking, the underlying structure of SUSY theories, etc. · First meeting at the ECFA/DESY LC Workshop, St. Malo, 12 - 15 April, 2002 · American working group led by Heidi Schellman & Frank Paige · Meeting in N. American: December 12-13, Fermilab
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

21


The LHC/LC Study Group
· The Fermilab meeting covered a broad range of topics
­ Higgs, SUSY, Exotics, and the Tevatron

· Plan:
­ prepare a draft document by late spring/early summer ­ use as input to Les Houches Workshop
· Third Les Houches workshop on Physics at TeV scale colliders · May 26 - June 6

· Frank Paige will speak on in the next talk

LC Physics in the LHC Era

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

22


Monthly Electronic Continental Meetings
· We plan to begin a monthly series of continentwide electronic meetings in February

­ committee: D. Amidei, G. Gollin, N. Graf, R. Patterson, J. Brau, M. Oreglia ­ the December LHC/LC Workshop at Fermilab served as a warm-up

Telephone-links for audio Electronic files of the transparencies posted on the web VRVS used for video contact
­ send suggestions for topics and speakers to committee above
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

23


ALCPG Documentation System
· Instituting a repository for ALCPG notes and other LC-related documentation.
­ ALCPG contacts: Norman Graf and Jeff Richman

· Backend database provides versioning support and searching capabilities. · Full-featured web interface for insertion and retrieval. · Customizable to allow for future extension. · Institutional support for database and web interface.

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

24


ALCPG Documentation System
· Currently defining the archive structure. ­ Emphasis on formal writeups of physics analyses, algorithms, detector R&D. ­ Also contain canonical figures & plots. · Expect main path for authors to be through the working groups (for minimal QA). · Schedule for delivery has slipped, expect to have first version testable by end of month.

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

25


US LC Steering Group
­ J. Bagger , J. Brau, D. Burke, S. Dawson, J. Dorfan (chair), G. Dugan , J. Friedman, J. Gates, S. Holmes, Y-K. Kim, D. Marlow, M. Oreglia, M. Tigner, M. Witherell, H. Lynch (exec. secretary) (1st paragraph) The U.S. Linear Collider Steering Group leads universities and national laboratories working toward U.S. participation in an international high-energy, high-luminosity, electron-positron linear collider wherever it is built and preparing elements of a bid to host the project in the U.S. The Steering Group has been meeting regularly and is actively working to make the LC a reality Jonathan Dorfan will give us a report Friday at 2, followed by a discussion/town meeting
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

CHARTER

·

·

·

26


Our effort is world-wide
· Extende d Joint ECFA/DESY Study on Physics and Detectors for a Linear Electron-Positron Collider · ACFA Workshop series

·

Next workshop
­ Apr 1-4, Amsterdam

·

July 10-12, 2002 - 5th ACFA Workshop on Physics/Detector at the Linear Collider , Tokyo

Many of us have been participating overseas about 20 attended each of the past two DESY/ ECFA WSs We need to continue and strengthen this cooperation
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

27


International R&D Coordination
· International Detector R&D Committee report summarizes the world-wide R&D effort
­ http://blueox. uoregon .edu/~lc/randd.html ­ report has moved to a set of web pages

·

International R&D Review meetings
­ Jan 8 - UT Arlington · vertex detectors and intermediate trackers ­ March 31 - Amsterdam · main tracker and muon detection ­ Summer - Asia · calorimetry and forward detectors

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

28


World-wide Linear Collider Vertex Detector Workshop VXD Reports January 8, 2003

About 30 participants 10 at Arlington, the rest calling in

,

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

29


International Linear Collider Steering Committee
Membership
H. Chen (IHEP, Beijing) B. Foster (Bristol) P. Grannis (Stony Brook, US) L. Maiani (CERN) W. Namkung (POSTECH, Korea) H. Sugawara (KEK) Y. Totsuka (Tokyo) M. Witherell (Fermilab) J. C. S. D. A. M. A. Dorfan (SLAC) Garcia Canal (La Plata, Argentina) Komamiya (Tokyo) Miller (UCL, UK) Skrinsky (BINP) Tigner (Cornell) ­ Chair Wagner (DESY)

· ·

Promoting the construction of an LC world-wide Maury will update us on the work of this committee Saturday afternoon A major development on the international scene has been the work of the Technical Review Committee (chair: G. Loew)
­ Several talks this morning will be devoted to informing us on the status of the collider technology options and the work of the TRC
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

·

30


Global Detector Network
· Basic Notion: Detector Control Rooms in different regions of the world · World wide study looking into this
­ America - Mike Hildreth and Rick van Kooten ­ Europe - Vaclav Vrba and Joachim Mnich ­ Asia - to be appointed

· First discussion at ECFA/DESY meeting in Prague · Here, Mike and Rick will lead a discussion on Friday at 5:30

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

31


Future Meetings of the ALCPG
· Plans are underway for the next ALCPG meeting
­ July 13-16 at Cornell
­ plan to have a joint meeting with LC accelerator community

· Beyond Cornell:

­ Next meeting Dec or Jan ­ We will consider all proposals:
· Canada, Mexico, US ......

· Monthly continental televideo/teleconferences
variety of topics of general interest ten per year (begin February)

Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

32


Conclusions
Charge to the Workshop (and News) · We has seen a significant spurt of activity in the community during 2002 · We expect increased support for R&D in the coming year, making possible much stronger detector hardware efforts · We have a lot of work to do here at Arlington
Jim Brau, Arlington, January 9, 2003

33