|
Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес
оригинального документа
: http://zebu.uoregon.edu/1998/ph162/l19.html
Дата изменения: Tue Jun 2 05:40:48 1998 Дата индексирования: Tue Oct 2 00:34:16 2012 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: asteroid |
its important that
this is believed!
Clearly, environmental pollution is unavoidable so informed decisions must be made.
Forms of Pollution:
Greenhouse gases
Smog
Nuclear Waste (
)
Oil spills
Not in My Back Yard: build that thang over thar
Global Impact of Sources of Energy Generation:
totally disrupts the
Carbon Cycle and is non-equilibrium. Eventually, enough Carbon
Dioxide will be in the atmosphere to effect things seriously. We
may, in fact be
there already
Intensive use of Land Area due to low efficiency.
Significant thermal pollution. For instance, a 1000 MW solar facility
would dump 10,000 Megawatts of heat into the local atmosphere. Its
unclear what the effects of this would be but this is like
an Urban Heat Island
The world or the US's potential has not been fully tapped.
No pollution for this but serious alteration of free flowing waterways.
structural/virtual pollution but not much else
Normally the carbon content of fuels (which is high) oxidizes during the combustion process to form CO2 (carbon dioxide)
Incomplete combustion leads to the formation of CO:
Sources of CO pollution: (million tons per year)
Motor Vehicles -------------> 54 Aircraft -------------------> 2 Coal -----------------------> 0.7 Fuel Oil -------------------> 0.1 Industrial Wood Processing--> 8.8 Forest Fires ---------------> 6.5
Automobiles dominate because the combustion of gasoline under conditions of high pressure is quite incomplete
Some Internet Resources on Pollution:
For the future our choices are:
Every form of energy generation has environmental fall-out. Can
we pick the best one globally and or locally? As long as the
decisions are driven by "voodoo" economics (i.e. heavy subsidy),
intelligent decisions are not likely to occur.
Most forms of alternative energy genearation require much less of
an organizational infrastructure. This means that a shift to
alternative energies means a loss of jobs. This is undesireable
to most politicians.
Evaluation Criteria for Alternative Energies:
Evaluation |
Solar Thermal |
PV |
Hydro |
Wind |
OTEC |
Tidal |
GEO |
Biomass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital Costs |
Large |
Large |
Enormous |
Moderate |
Enormous+ |
Enormous |
Small |
Small |
Operating Costs |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Neglegible |
Small |
Unknown |
Neglegible |
Small |
Moderate |
Efficiency |
15% |
5--10% |
80% |
42% |
7% + |
25% |
100% |
25% |
Renewable |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Erratic |
Yes |
Yes |
NO |
Maybe |
Storage |
Not Needed |
Unclear |
Built-IN |
Essential |
Not Needed |
Unclear |
Not Needed |
Not Needed |
Pollution |
None Really |
Waste Heat |
None |
Visual |
None |
None |
Steam Plumes |
Particulates; CO |
Levelized Costs |
25 cents KWH |
16 cents KWH |
4 cents KWH |
4.5 cents KWH |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Low |
Unknown |
Environmental Impact |
Moderate |
Large |
Enormous |
Small |
Unknown |
Outrageous |
Small |
Moderate |
Large Scale |
Too Expensive |
Possible but Expensive |
Proven already |
Very Possible |
The Solution |
Discrete Locations |
Discrete Locations |
Net Energy Gain? |
Small Scale |
NO |
Difficult |
Low Head --> Legal |
Definitely |
NO |
NO |
NO |
Absolutely |
Unit Capacity |
1000 MW |
Depends on Acreage |
2000-6000 MW |
Highly Variable |
As large as you need |
250 MW |
1000 MW |
50-100 MW |
Employment Opportunties |
Few |
Few |
Few |
Few |
Lots to build it |
Some |
Few |
Many |
What about Energy Storage?
Options:
We need better batteries period (also for electric vehicles): US is investing in this
melts the pressure containment vessel
energy intensive
Wind energy coupled with advanced battery design has real promise.
OTEC provides a truly large scale solution
Solar PV does not look economically viable
As of 1998 there remains little incentive to not look for new oil reserves