Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://xmm.vilspa.esa.es/external/xmm_sw_cal/icwg/presentations/e0102_plucinsky.pdf Дата изменения: Mon Jun 19 12:29:01 2006 Дата индексирования: Sat Dec 22 14:59:30 2007 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: п п п п п п п п р п п р п п р п п р п п р п п р п п р п п р п п р п п р п п р п

Chandra X-Ray Observatory

CXC

1E0102.2-7219 as a Standard Candle for X-ray Astronomy

Paul Plucinsky, Joseph DePasquale, Steven Snowden
Paul Plucinsky 1

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory

CXC

Why Use E0102 as a Calibration Source for X-ray Astronomy?
Well-characterized spectrum, both the Chandra HETG and XMM RGS have observed the object · The spectrum is relatively simple by astrophysical standards, no or very little Fe, strong lines of O, Ne, and Mg · Extended source so pileup effects are minimized · Constant source · The O and Ne lines sample an energy range in which the on-board calibration source does not have strong lines · Low-energy part of the bandpass is always a challenge to calibrate

·

We are VERY close to agreeing on the model spectrum !!!
Paul Plucinsky 2

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Gratuitous Pretty Pictures of E0102
S3 Summed Data ~100 ks True Color Image

CXC

Paul Plucinsky

3

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Spectral Model: Calibration vs. Astrophysics
Primary Objectives are to measure the gain, the spectral redistribution function, and detection efficiency in the 0.5 -2.0 keV range · Our immediate concern is to develop a model useful for calibration, not to develop an astrophysically-meaningful model, · We use a model consisting of Gaussians for the lines identified by the HETG and RGS, a bremsstrahlung for the continuum, and a two component absorption (Galactic and SMC) · Line energies are fixed at the true values and the widths of the Gaussians are fixed at zero, so the only parameter which varies is the normalization · Pollock has added recombination edges to the RGS model and has non-zero widths for some of the lines · When fitting CCD spectra, ratios of the F-I-R lines in a triplet are fixed to the RGS and/or HETG value
Paul Plucinsky 4

CXC

·

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory

CXC

RGS Spectrum from Pollock
OVIII

OVII NeIX NeX

OVIII

OVII

CVI

Paul Plucinsky

5

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Pollock RGS vs. Flanagan (2004) HETG

CXC

Adopt line widths from Pollock

Paul Plucinsky

6

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
OVII For OVII Res

CXC

Pollock RGS vs. Flanagan (2004)HETG (O line region)

OVIII Ly-

OVIII Ly-

Paul Plucinsky

7

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory

CXC

Pollock RGS vs. Flanagan (2004) HETG (Ne line region)

Ne X Ly-

Ne IX triplet

Ne X Ly-

Paul Plucinsky

8

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Pollock RGS vs. Flanagan (2004) HETG Line Fluxes
Line OVII For OVII Res O VIII Ly- O VIII Ly- Ne IX triplet Ne X Ly- Ne X Ly- Flanagan Flux 13.95 24.38 37.31 6.37 23.18 9.72 2.07
9

CXC

Pollock Flux 11.53 27.23 40.65 7.78 21.15 12.70 1.87

(10-4 photons cm-2 s-1) (10-4 photons cm-2 s-1)

Difference +17.3% -11.7% -8.9% -15.9% +8.8% -30.7% +9.7%

Paul Plucinsky

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
S3(BI)
Ne X Ly-

CXC

Mg XI triplet OVIII Ly- OVII triplet Ne IX triplet

Paul Plucinsky

10

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
I3(FI)
OVIII Ly- OVII triplet Mg XI triplet

CXC

Ne IX Ne X Ly- triplet

Paul Plucinsky

11

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Thick Filter Large Window

CXC

MOS 1 MOS 2

Paul Plucinsky

12

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
PN Thick Filter Small Window

CXC

Paul Plucinsky

13

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Pollock RGS vs. SPIE Plucinsky (2006)
Plucinsky Add some lines from Pollock but keeps Bremsstrahlung continuum

CXC

Paul Plucinsky

14

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Joint Fit With Line Energies Frozen
pn S3, S3 MOS1

CXC

Paul Plucinsky

15

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Independent Fits: SMC NH=5.65 e20 cm-2 Bremsstrahlung kT=0.95 keV and Ne line complexes energies free, Normalizations free

CXC

S3: OBSID 3545, Red 2=1.27

S3: OBSID 6765, Red 2=1.48

pn, Red 2=2.69

MOS1, Red 2=2.51

Paul Plucinsky

16

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
·
·

CXC

O VII Ly and Ne X Ly Normalization Results
Data sets fit independently, O and Ne line complexes are free to vary as a group SMC NH=5.65x1020 cm-2, Bremsstrahlung kT=0.95 keV
Instrumen t ACIS S3 (node 1) ACIS S3 (node 0) O VIII Ly Norm (x 10-3 photons cm-2 s) 6.58 [6.44,6.94] 6.92 [6.79,7.36] 6.14 [6.09,6.19] 6.42 [6.35,6.53] Ne X Ly Norm (x 10-3 photons cm-2 s) 1.80 [1.73,1.88] 1.77 [1.69,1.84] 1.74 [1.72,1.76] 1.71 [1.68,1.73] Red 2 1.27 1.48 2.69 2.51 DOF 95 93 279 92

OBSID 3545 [90% CL] 6765 [90% CL]

0135720801 pn [90% CL] 0135720601 MOS1 [90% CL]

· Ne X Ly a normalizations agree within ~6.0% for ACIS, pn, & MOS1

· Early S3 and MOS1 agree within ~2.0% for O VIII Ly normalizations
· Most recent S3 and pn disgree by ~18.0% for O VIII Ly normalizations
Paul Plucinsky 17

ICWG June 2006


Chandra X-Ray Observatory
Let's Agree on a Model !!!!!!!
Purpose: to improve the low-energy response model of ACIS, MOS and pn CCD instruments

CXC

1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6)

RGS and HETG agree on flux of bright lines RGS and HETG compromise on existence of weak lines RGS and HETG agree on widths for the lines Select a continuum model and absorption HETG team must analyze second epoch observations of E0102 Fit ACIS, MOS, and pn with the same model

Paul Plucinsky

18

ICWG June 2006