Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес
оригинального документа
: http://www.stsci.edu/itm/1999-05/ITM_1999_05.html
Дата изменения: Mon Jul 19 20:54:53 1999 Дата индексирования: Sat Mar 1 07:59:32 2014 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: diurnal motion |
This report describes the procedures for processing a Target of Opportunity activation request.
Accepted ToO programs require a Phase II submission. The Program Coordinator (PC) assigned to a ToO proposal is responsible for the following items:
The PI should provide a contact and alternates (including their phone numbers and e-mail addresses) who can activate the ToO.
The PI or an alternate initiates activation of a proposal by submitting a ToO Activation Request . In the request the PI identifies the visit (or visits) to activate and supplies the information needed to properly schedule the observation on HST. This information should include target position, instrument filter/grating combinations, exposure times, and any other scheduling requirements not already in the submitted Phase II program.
After submitting the activation request, the PI must contact the Program Coordinator (PC) or one of the alternates listed on the form and verify that it has been received by the Institute.
The PC (or an alternate) verifies receipt of the request and discusses any remaining questions with the PI. These should include:
The contact person sends an e-mail message to the following groups, alerting them that a ToO has been activated:
A TOC -- usually the PC for "uncomplicated" proposals -- will coordinate the evaluation of the request and obtain its approval or denial. In the case of complicated or very short turn around proposals, the PC may need to concentrate on implementation issues, and another person will assume the TOC duties.
The PC, the CS, and the SPST calendar supervisor identify execution opportunities and how well the observations of this event meet the approved science goals. Long Range Planning (LRP) assesses the effect of the ToO's insertion into the schedule on other HST observations. Then the TOC will make a recommendation to the Director's office, and the Director's Office makes the final decision whether to activate the ToO. The TOC or the PC should relay this decision to the PI.
The PC discusses with the PI all the observation and scheduling requirements and decides if the Phase II has to be resubmitted. The PC and the SPST calendar supervisor will determine the deadline for submission of Phase II, emphasizing to the PI that failure to resubmit on time may prevent execution of the observation.
Normally, Duccio Machetto, Associate Director for Science Programs, makes the final decision approving (or denying) the activation of a ToO. If he's not available, then one of the following individuals can make the decision:
After approval by the Director's Office, the HST schedule of observations is replanned to include the ToO observations.
By this time the Phase II program should have been resubmitted, if necessary. The CS, the PC and SPST will conduct a review of the proposal to assure the safety of the observations and to verify that the program complies with the observing time allocation and scientific objectives. ToO proposals using the STIS MAMA detectors must pass bright object checking before they can be scheduled. The CS will conduct a Phase B review.
After the Phase II has been prepped and all necessary reviews have been completed, the PC sends a galley proof message to the PI, which includes a deadline for the PI's response (if done by phone an entry should be made in the history file). After the PI approves, the PC sets the visits to flight ready.
Visits that need a short turn-around (fewer than 7 days) require a pre-approval from the Director's office. The PC already should have worked out any implementation questions with the PI. When the request comes in, it must be handled without delay or it may not be possible to schedule the observations. The same procedure will be followed, but the steps outlined previously must be done in parallel rather than sequentially.
The PI must be prompt with any changes to the program. For some types of ToOs, it may be wise for the PI to develop and submit a Phase II with several versions of the same visit, depending on the expected range of parameters of the event (e.g., visits with different exposure times depending on target magnitude). Then, when the ToO is activated, the appropriate visit(s) would be selected rather than waiting for a resubmission.
Director's Office approval can be a time consuming step, especially if the activation request occurs after business hours. For short turn-around visits, the PC should work with Presto management and the Director's Office to understand the conditions for approval of an activation request. This pre-approval specifies the conditions that the TOC can use to make a final decision on whether to activate the visit or not. The specific pre-approval requirements are unique to each proposal and are based on:
PI Contact and Verification (See Verification and Discussion of Request) |
||
Rapid Processing Required? (See Visits Requiring Rapid Processing) |
||
Activation Request E-mail Alert (See Activation Alert) |
||
ToO Coordinator Assigned (See Target of Opportunity Coordinator (TOC)) |
||
Evaluation (See Evaluation) |
||
Phase II Resubmission? |
||
Recommendation to Director's Office (See Evaluation) |
||
Director's Office Approval (See Approval by the Director's Office) |
||
Relay DO Decision to PI |
||
Scheduled (See Replanning and Scheduling) |
||
Flight Ready (See Replanning and Scheduling) |
||
LRP Reschedules Displaced Visits (See Replanning and Scheduling) |
||
Notify PC/CS and OPM (See Replanning and Scheduling) |