Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.stsci.edu/institute/stuc/oct06-presentations/Agenda.pdf Дата изменения: Wed Apr 18 00:25:30 2007 Дата индексирования: Sat Dec 22 18:23:56 2007 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п

STUC AGENDA OCTOBER 25, BOARDROOM 8.15 Breakfast @ Boardroom 8.30 Executive session 9.00 STScI Outlook 9.45 HST Status 10.15 Break 10.30 STIS closeout 11.00 Calibration Plans for Cycle 15 & 16 - WFPC2 plans - NICMOS plans - STUC comments on calibration plans 12.00 Executive session 12.30 Lunch @ Cafeteria 13.30 Post SM4 instrument complement (Items 5,7 below) -overlap among instruments/modes 14.45 Break 15.00 Discussion of capabilities -by passband (UV, optical, NIR) and Imaging/Spectroscopy 16.00 COS report (Item 8) 16.15 WFC3 report (Item 8) 16.30 Executive session 17.30 Adjourn 18.30 Dinner @ Colonnade

Elvis Mountain Jenkner Goudfrooij Sparks Biretta Noll

Kriss STUC Keyes MacKenty

OCTOBER 26, BOARDROOM 8.15 Breakfast @ Boardroom 8.30 Executive session 9.15 Cycle 16 (Items 2 and 3) Reid - CP - Great Observatories workshop and new proposal opportunities - Plans to respond to a potential sudden failure of the ACS - Operational changes 10.30 Break 10.45 Status of the Project and Program Burch/Leckrone/Wiseman - SM4 status & priorities (Item 1 below) - Update on budget situation. 11.45 General discussion 12.30 Date of next meeting 12.45 Lunch 13.30 Drafting of report 14.30 Feed-back to the Director 15.30 Adjourn


Summary of STUC Recommendations, April 2006 1. We would be like to hear about contingencies in the case of reduced EVAs at the next STUC meeting. 2. STUC would like to hear a discussion of what happens to STIS programs terminated by failure, if SM4 succeeds in reviving STIS? 3. We will be interested to see the results of the Great Observatories workshop at the next meeting. 4. STUC encourages the ECF to present its detailed plan for the next 4 years to the STUC after the ESA/ESO review. 5. We would like to receive an overview of resource allocation between the various projects at the next meeting. In view of the current budget situation, the STUC recommends that these efforts should be prioritized. 6. We also would like to hear how the Institute will respond to the dropping of IRAF support by NOAO. What are the costs to STScI, and is pyraf a complete substitute? 7. Post-SM4 there will be 6 instruments in the HST focal plane. The STUC would like to hear about how STScI plans to cope with these observational riches, and how instruments should be prioritized in a time of tight budgets. We suggest that this issue could be the topic of a major review (e.g 1 day) at the next STUC meeting. A primer on quasi-duplicative modes among instruments and usage levels of modes would be informative. We are happy to defer or minimize some of the more routine presentations in order to accommodate this review in the STUC agenda. 8. We are happy to accept the offer to hear from the instrument teams on their calibration plans for COS, WFPC3 both on the ground and on-orbit, at the next STUC meeting. 9. We had hoped for more interaction with STScI staff however. Perhaps a buffet format could be tried at the next meeting, allowing STUC members to sit anywhere, and staff could be explicitly invited to mingle with STUC members?