Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.stsci.edu/institute/stuc/oct-2014/frontier-fields2.pdf Дата изменения: Unknown Дата индексирования: Mon Apr 11 04:04:39 2016 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: http www.stsci.edu science goods

Hubble Space Telescope Frontier Fields MidTerm Review
*Membership: James Bullock (UC-Irvine) [Chair] , Mark Dickinson (NOAO), Richard Ellis (Caltech), Mariska Kriek (UC-Berkeley), Sally Oey (U. Michigan), Stella Seitz (Munich U. Obs), S. Adam Stanford (UC-Davis), Jason Tumlinson (STScI)

* My view of where we stand: what follows was not yet read by the committee, but I've done my best to provide a sense of our current consensus. Not yet final recommendation, want to make sure we've had time to reflect/consult.
1


Brammer, VLT/Hawk-I K

FF program
(J. Lotz et al.)

6
! !

strong-lensing clusters



Blank Field (UDF parallel clone)

+6 140

adjacent parallel fields


HST DD orbits per pointing
Cluster
(Gravitational telescope)

2 clusters per year x 3 years


840

total orbits


! ACS/ WFC3-IR in parallel


~29th

ABmag in

7

bands





1000 hours Spitzer DD ~26.5 ABmag in IRAC
2

time for
3.6, 4.5 m

http://www.stsci.edu/hst/campaigns/frontier-fields/


The Frontier Fields
1 2 3

4

5

6

(relaxed, so. sky)

Abell 370

Abell S1063

chosen based on known lensing strength, sky location, ancillary data 3


5 groups funded to make magnification maps for FF before 1st observations ! (100s of arcs expected in FF data tighter constraints on lensing models)

http://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/frontier/lensmodels/ 4


why 6 clusters + parallel fields?
4

z~9 delensed volumes

Coe & Bradley 2014

Figure 3. Delensed z = 9 magnifications maps (CATS models) of the WFC3/IR fields (red outlines 136 123 ) to be imaged for each Frontier Fields cluster. In each panel, north is up and east is left.

00

00

D. Coe et al, 2014

high-redshift volumes probed by strong lensing is small
5


Science Goals: High-z ! · probe galaxies 10-50x intrinsically fainter than any seen before, particularly those before and during reionization ! · study the early formation histories of galaxies intrinsically faint enough to be the early progenitors of the Milky Way ! · study highly-magnified high-z galaxies in detail: structures, colors, sizes and provide targets for spectroscopic followup

· provide a statistical picture of galaxy formation at early times
Science Goals: Lower-z ! · deep and high-spatial resolution studies of sub-kpc structures and star-formation) ! · map out dark matter and substructure in cl ! · study cluster galaxies, dwarfs, intracluster ! · search for (lensed) SN, transients in distant ...
6

z~1-4 galaxies, (UV escape fraction, usters light in clusters universe


Early science - year 1
· ADS - 41 articles (39 refereed) with "Frontier Field" in abstract since 2012 (> 50%
use FF data or lensing maps) ! · HST - 14 funded Cycle 21, 22 programs with "Frontier Fields" in abstract ( 3 GO Treu, Siana, Rodney) ! · Chandra, ALMA, VLA, VLT Hawk-I, MUSE, Gemini GEMS AO, Keck ancillary observing campaigns underway ! · 3 Frontier Fields workshops planned for 2014-2015 ! Yale Frontier Fields Workshop, Nov 2014 ! Sesto, Italy, Feb 2015 " Science from the Frontier Fields" ! IAU Focus Meeting, August 2015 "The Frontier Fields: Transforming our Understanding of Cluster and Galaxy Evolution"

7


Our Charge
o Is Frontier Fields program is addressing scientific goals outlined by Hubble Deep Fields Working Group?
! ! !

o Are Frontier Fields data of a quality sufficient to advance deep field science?
! !

o Has STScI been a responsible steward of the Frontier Fields program
! !

o Should remaining two Frontier Fields observations be done (280 orbits total)?
!

o Can you recommend improvements that will maximize the science return?

8

!


Our Charge
o Is Frontier Fields program is addressing scientific goals outlined by Hubble Deep Fields Working Group?
! ! !

!

Yes - as well as can be determined at this early stage!

o Are Frontier Fields data of a quality sufficient to advance deep field science? ! ! Yes
!

o Has STScI been a responsible steward of the Frontier Fields program ! ! Yes (!)
!

o Should remaining two Frontier Fields observations be done (280 orbits total)? - Initial poll of committee: unanimous "Yes" ! o Can you recommend improvements that will maximize the science return?

-

!

Ongoing coordinated lens map efforts
9


Oct 14-15
Presentations by:! Jennifer Lotz ! Anton Koekemoer! Dan Coe! Tommaso Treu! Steve Rodney! Steve Finkelstein ! Brian Siana! Adi Zitrin! Marusa Bradac! Peter Capac!
Prior to the meeting we solicited feedback from:! - Rychard Bouwens, Tom Broadhurst, Yohan Richard, Brant Robertson, Rogier Windhorst
10

Frontier Fields overview! HST Data Releases & Pipeline ! FF Public Lensing Models! GLASS! Supernovae in the Frontier Fields! Blank Fields, high-z sources! UV imaging of Frontier Fields ! High-redshift galaxies/ Lens models! Lens models/Spitzer results! Spitzer FF Data!

Rachael Livermore ! Cluster Fields, high-z sources !


Overall Impression of *Committee Still too early to know ultimate impact of FF, but... Execution has been impressive. J. Lotz et al. doing GREAT job; big team, hard problem - Excellent calibration/distribution of data A lot of excitement in the community FF off to a quick start; lensing effort v. well received High-z detections roughly as expected (no bad surprises) - cluster fields more complex than blank but we knew this going in
11


Quick start. No red flags here.
12


Why continue?
-

Original charge made a good case for 6 clusters + 6 blank fields. Nothing indicates reasoning was flawed.
-

Lensing volumes are SMALL. Cosmic Variance BIG. We are "rolling the dice" from lens to lens. Two more rolls Continue to open up new legacy fields in the sky for follow-up; fields for JWST depth Momentum built. People are preparing for these clusters. Need to get it done.
13

-

-

-


Our Charge
!

o Can you recommend improvements to existing program that will maximize science return?

!

14


Lens maps: - impressive start - concerns linger - problems can be overcome The good: - Various maps yield consistent "global" results for high-z populations: LF's, ionizing photons, etc. - Many people using maps, even outside HST (e.g. ALMA) The bad: - Maps don't agree in detail; matters for individual galaxies - Need to figure out why groups don't agree - Need coordinated tests against simulations - As constraints/maps get better, playing field no longer level
15


Suggestions to maximize science return?

16


Suggestions to maximize science return?

Update / improve lens maps

17


Suggestions to maximize science return?
!

-

Calls for coordinated lens models should be ongoing. - Need re-level playing field for non-lensers - New maps for first 2 FF clusters should happen soon - Include updated redshifts, ancillary constraints
!

-

Promote more urgent simulation comparisons - could ask groups to provide maps of a simulation mock to illustrate accuracy as part of same call - could consider sponsoring a workshop
!

-

Details of the call should be worked out in consultation with experts. Upcoming Yale workshop great opportunity.
18


What else to maximize science return?
ICL maps in clusters would be useful - aid in understanding high-z sources ultimately would be nice to have vetted "standard" galaxy catalogs (spitzer + HST)
Might consider using upcoming workshops to issue a "Call to Arms" to the community: ! - Give us ICL maps & catalogs and we will act as a storehouse! - We will help you coordinate some community activity here!
19


Summary
o Is Frontier Fields program is addressing scientific goals outlined by Hubble Deep Fields Working Group?
! ! !

!

Yes - as well as can be determined at this early stage!

o Are Frontier Fields data of a quality sufficient to advance deep field science? ! ! Yes
!

o Has STScI been a responsible steward of the Frontier Fields program ! ! Yes (!)
!

o Should remaining two Frontier Fields observations be done (280 orbits total)? - Initial poll of committee: unanimous "Yes" ! o Can you recommend improvements that will maximize the science return?

-

!

Ongoing coordinated lens map efforts
20