Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.stsci.edu/hst/ghrs/documents/handbooks/dhb/c12_ghrserrors.fm.html
Дата изменения: Unknown
Дата индексирования: Tue Apr 12 02:58:55 2016
Кодировка:

Поисковые слова: trifid nebula
GHRS Data Handbook
STScI Logo

Chapter 37 GHRS Error Sources

[Top] [Prev] [Next]


In This Chapter...

About Flux Calibrations / 37-2
Spectrum Level and the Sensitivity -Function / 37-2
Spectrum Shape / 37-16
Spectrum Noise and Structure / 37-18
Calibration Quality Files / 37-22
About Wavelength Calibrations / 37-23
Spatial Uncertainty: Target Acquisition Problems / 37-28
Observation Timing / 37-29
Instrument and Spacecraft Errors / 37-31

A GHRS spectrum has several dimensions, each with associated error and uncertainty. The two most obvious dimensions are flux and wavelength, which we plot to show the spectrum. But time is also a dimension of the spectrum, in the sense of when the spectrum was obtained, how long the exposure lasted, and the extent of interruptions of that exposure. Spatial dimensions-the positioning of the object within the aperture-are also relevant. Finally, there are instrumental and spacecraft errors that influence the data.

In Table 37.1, we provide a summary of the accuracies you can expect from your data when you have recalibrated it with the latest calhrs software and the best reference files (as recommended by StarView's Best Reference File screen-see Chapter 1 in Volume 1), assuming your target acquisition was successful and appropriate for your science slit, and, for photometry, assuming a wide aperture was used. In some cases improvements can be made further by using the calibration information and post observation refinement tasks described in this Data Handbook-these cases are noted in the table.
Summary of GHRS Errors and Uncertainties1

Attribute Accuracy Limiting Factors
Flux, absolute

5%

Confidence in absolute flux scale

Flux, relative: same star, same wavelength

2-4%2

Grating at same position for all observations

Flux, relative: within an exposure

2 to 4%

2% typical, 4% worst case (G140L, 100 Å away)

Flux, relative: different setups

4%

2% typical; vignetting, sensitivity determinations

Flux, relative: pre-COSTAR

4%

Centering in LSA, poor PSF

Wavelengths, relative: within an exposure

<0.1 diode

Dispersion highly reliable

Wavelengths, absolute: default wavelength calibration

1.1 diodes

Assumes worst case from Table 37.8

Wavelengths, absolute: use of SPYBAL

0.4 diode

GIM effects and carrousel uncertainty

Wavelengths, absolute: use of wavecal

0.3 diode

GIM effects

1 See page 37-17 for applicability to G270M.

2 Can vary to 4% at shortest wavelength. For side 2, can be improved by correction for time-dependent -variations, as in Figure 37.3.

In this chapter we will discuss each of the dimensions affecting the accuracy of your data in turn and examine what is known about them from the experience gained since the GHRS started operation.


[Top] [Prev] [Next]


Copyright © 1997, Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy. All rights reserved.

Last updated: 01/14/98 15:56:00