Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.stecf.org/conferences/sardinia/node21.html
Дата изменения: Mon Jun 12 19:04:27 2006
Дата индексирования: Mon Oct 1 20:58:45 2012
Кодировка:
Поисковые слова: comet hale-bopp

The Stellar Population in the NICMOS Parallel Fields

A. Pasquali, G. De Marchi and W. Freudling ST European Coordination Facility - ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, Garching bei München, Germany, D-85748, E-mail: apasqual@eso.org

     

 

Abstract:

We present the preliminary results of the analysis of the NICMOS/GRISM parallel observations from programs $\char93$7811, 7922 and 7907. Images and spectra have been reduced and calibrated through CALNICC and NICMOSLOOK. We have used the morphology and the radial profile of the objects identified by CALNICC on the direct images together with the SExtractor class parameter defined by CALNICC for each object to separate stars from galaxies. We here discuss the stars/galaxies distributions in the J and H bands and their corresponding color-magnitude diagrams obtained from both imaging and spectroscopic data.

stellar population,late spectral types

The NICMOS Parallel program

NICMOS Camera 3 is being used in parallel mode to observe galactic fields at both high and low galactic latitudes. One of the scientific goals of the NICMOS campaign is to detect substellar objects, such as brown dwarfs and objects close to the stellar mass-cutoff. The astrophysical relevance of these stellar categories covers many issues, from the star formation mechanisms to the physics of stellar atmospheres, the nature of the dark matter and the galactic structure.

Parallel observations are mostly made in the J and H bands. For each telescope pointing, they comprise direct imaging through the F110W and the F160W filters and grism spectroscopy with the G096 and G141 grisms. Acquisitions are typically of about 250 s and 900 s for imaging and spectroscopy, respectively. The corresponding program IDs are 7811, 7907 and 7922.

The data are processed using the NICMOS pipeline; dithered exposures of the same fields are associated and combined into one image, which is then the input for CALNICB. The direct and grism combined images are used for each pointing by CALNICC in order to identify the objects in the field, derive their J, H photometry from the direct image and extract and calibrate their low dispersion spectra from the grism acquisition.

Some Statistics

We have reduced and analysed so far the NIC3 data obtained for 52 independent field pointings. Out of these, only 13 fields have been observed through both F110W and F160W filters and G096 and G141 grisms; 22 have been imaged only in F160W and the corresponding G141, and only 17 have been acquired through F110W and G096. Most of the fields are at high galactic latitude; as Figure 1 shows, only 8 pointings are within |b| = 10^o, i.e. the galactic disk.

  

Figure 1: NICMOS parallel fields distribution in galactic latitude.

We have run CALNICC over the data in order to identify the objects in each frame, measure their fluxes and CLASS parameter through SExtractor, which has been implemented in CALNICC for object identification and photometry. The CLASS parameter may be considered as a sort of ellipticity indicator, so that those objects having CLASS $\geq$ 0.85 may be classified as point sources. Since the CLASS parameter seems to be sensitive to variable sky background, we have also traced the radial profile for each identified object and given more weight to the latter to distinguish stars from galaxies. Figure 2 shows the distribution of the objects classified either as stars or galaxies from their radial profiles as a function of their CLASS parameter. It is clear that there is an excellent agreement between the CLASS- and radial-profile- classifications in the case of galaxies, while there may be $\sim$ 30$\%$ contamination for the stars sample.

  

Figure 2: Histograms of stars and galaxies classified by their radial profile as a function of their CLASS parameter. The solid and the dotted lines represent objects detected in the F110W and F160W images, respectively.

We have classified a total of 418 stars and 546 galaxies down to the magnitude set by a detection limit of 5$\sigma$ above the local background. It is then interesting to correlate the number of stars and galaxies with the galactic latitude of the analysed field pointings. The ratio of stars to galaxies has been plotted in Figure 3 as a function of galactic latitude: a clear increase in the number of detected stars over galaxies is seen towards the galactic bulge and disk.

  

Figure 3: The number ratio of stars to galaxies for the individual 52 pointings as a function of galactic latitude.

The aperture fluxes measured by SExtractor in CALNICC have been transformed into the HST instrumental magnitudes for both stars and galaxies by reading the inverse sensitivity PHOTLAM from the images header and adopting a zero-point of 21.1 mag. Subsequently, the instrumental F110W and F160 W magnitudes have been translated into the Vegamag system magnitudes by subtracting 2.3 mag and 3.7 mag, respectively. These magnitudes are more similar, although not identical, to J and H in the Johnson - Cousin system. Since 4 fields were observed several times through both filters, we have been able to estimate from them our photometric uncertainty, which turns out to be $\leq$ 0.1 mag in both bands for magnitudes brighter than 19, while it increases up to 0.5 down to the limiting magnitude. Figure 4 describes the photometric properties of our samples: stars are characterized by a limiting magnitude of 23 in J and 22.5 in H. Their distribution peaks at about 20 in J and H with a bright tail extending up to 11.5 in J and 11 in H. The limiting magnitude for galaxies is somewhat fainter: 23.5 in J and 23 in H. Galaxies peak at about 22 in J and 21 in H and can be as bright as 16 mag in J and 15 mag in H. These limiting magnitudes are of course set by the relatively short exposure times and also by the fact that, at fainter magnitudes, galaxies are more easily detected than stars due to their extended structure.

  

Figure 4: The magnitude distributions of stars and galaxies in the J and H bands.

The Stellar Population

We have here restricted our analysis to the stellar sample. We have used the 13 field pointings observed in both F110W and F160W filters to construct the color-magnitude diagram in Figure 5, where the magnitudes are not dereddened.

  

Figure 5: The observed color-magnitude diagram of the stars detected in 13 fields imaged through both F110W and F160W filters.

The distribution peaks around (J-H) = 1, typical of late spectral types; it is however broadened between 0.5 and 1.5 because of the photometric uncertainty, which becomes quite large ($\sim$ 0.5 mag) for those stars close to the limiting magnitude. It is known that the (J-H) color is not particularly sensitive in discriminating stars of different late spectral type and metallicity; to do this, at least a second color is required. To better understand the spectral type of the objects in Figure 5, we have defined the color (I-J)' as (I' - J'), where I' is the magnitude in a box filter between 0.8 $\mu$m and 0.9 $\mu$m and J' covers the range 1.05 $\mu$m to 1.15 $\mu$m. We have measured the (I-J)' color using the G096 grism spectra for all stars in the 13 fields brighter than J = 20 which ensures a good spectral S/N ratio. We have also computed the (I-J)' color for stars of late spectral type in the BPGS library available in IRAF in order to build a comparison grid of known spectral types. The resulting two colors diagram is shown in Figure 6, where the (I-J)' and (J-H) colors of the detected stars are not corrected for reddening.

  

Figure 6: The observed two colors diagram of the stars detected in 13 fields imaged through both F110W and F160W filters (black dots). Also plotted are the colors derived from the BPGS library spectra (open squares).

The comparison shows that the detected stars are mostly dwarfs of K and M spectral types.

We have also adopted an alternative approach to the problem of deriving stellar spectral types. In fact, we have been able to cross-identify 13 stars out of 418 with the US Navy Observatory Catalogue which has provided us with photographic B and V magnitudes, subsequently scaled to the Johnson system. The typical B and V photometric error is of 0.25 mag and 0.5 mag for stars at positive and negative galactic latitude, respectively, and the cross-identification is uncertain by about 1 arcsec. For the 13 cross-identified stars we have estimated the reddening from the HI maps of Stark et al. (1992), which give the HI column density for each position in the sky. HI column densities have been transformed into E(B-V) through the relation of Diplas & Savage (1994): N(HI) = 4.93 $\times$ 10²¹E(B-V), and we have used the E(B-V) values derived in this way to correct for reddening the available B, V, J and H magnitudes. We have been able at this point to trace the Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) for the 13 stars and match each of these to the SEDs derived from the BPGS spectra. The best fits are shown in Figures 7 and 8, where the errorbars are those of the USN Observatory Catalogue for the B and V bands, and are set to 0.1 mag for the NICMOS J and H bands being brighter than 19 mag (cfr. Sect. 2). Although fits generally get worse at B and V magnitudes fainter than 18, we may conclude that they add a noticeable component of G dwarfs to the previous population of K and M dwarfs (cfr. Figure 6).

We will extend the present analysis to the remaining data of the NIC3 Parallel Campaign and follow up this study by addressing two main astrophysical issues: the spatial distribution, the Luminosity Function (LF) and hence the Initial Mass Function (IMF)of galactic low mass stars.

  

Figure 7: Fits to the observed, dereddened SEDs.

  

Figure 8: Fits to the observed, dereddened SEDs.

We would like to thank Norbert Pirzkal for supporting the data reduction software during this work. We would also like to thank Luca Pasquini for useful discussions.