Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес
оригинального документа
: http://www.stecf.org/conferences/adass/adassVII/bushouseh.html
Дата изменения: Mon Jun 12 18:51:51 2006 Дата индексирования: Tue Oct 2 00:24:45 2012 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: п п п п п п п п |
Next: Enhanced HST Pointing and Calibration Accuracy: Generating HST Jitter Files at ST-ECF
Up: Dataflow and Scheduling
Previous: The Ground Support Facilities for the BeppoSAX Mission
Table of Contents -- Index -- PS reprint -- PDF reprint
Howard A. Bushouse
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218,
Email: bushouse@stsci.edu
Elizabeth Stobie
University of Arizona, Steward Observatory, Tucson, AZ 85721
This group of five data arrays is called an image set, or ``imset'' for short. NICMOS operation modes that produce multiple readouts of the detector during a single exposure have multiple imsets in a single FITS file; one imset per readout. Multiple observations of a single target are stored in separate FITS files, but the data are logically associated through the use of an ``association table'', which is a FITS file containing a single BINTABLE extension, listing the names and other relevant information for each observation in the association. One-dimensional spectra that are extracted from NICMOS grism images are also stored in a BINTABLE extension of a FITS file. There is never any image data in the primary header-data unit (HDU) of NICMOS FITS files; all data are stored in IMAGE or BINTABLE extensions. The primary HDUs only contain header keywords with information that is relevant to all extensions in the file.
These sets of observations are known as image ``associations''. The associations are a logical grouping only, in that the individual observations that make up an association are initially stored and processed separately, but are eventually combined by the pipeline software into a final product. The individual observations are first processed, one at a time, by the calnica task, which performs instrumental calibration, and are then processed as a group by the calnicb task, which combines the images, measures and removes background signal, and produces final mosaic images. Information about the association is stored in an association table, which is a FITS file with a single BINTABLE extension. The table extension lists the names of the observation datasets contained in the association and their role in the association (target or background image).
The major steps performed by calnica include the masking (setting DQ image values) of defective pixels in the images, the computation of uncertainties (setting ERR image values) for the image data, which includes both detector readnoise and Poisson noise in the detected signal, dark current subtraction, correction for non-linear detector response, flat fielding, and conversion from detected counts to count rates. Each calibration step that involves the application of reference data (e.g., dark subtraction, flat fielding) propagates estimated uncertainties in the reference data into the ERR images of the data being processed.
Another major step performed by calnica is the combination of images generated by the MultiAccum operational mode of the NICMOS detectors, in which multiple non-destructive detector readouts are performed during the course of a single exposure. The images generated by each readout are first individually calibrated and are then combined into a single, final output image. The image combination is accomplished by fitting a straight line to the (cumulative) exposure time vs. detected counts data pairs for each pixel, using a standard linear regression algorithm. Cosmic ray hits in individual readouts are detected and rejected during this processes by searching for and rejecting outliers from the fit. The fit and reject process is iterated for each pixel until no new samples are rejected. The slope of the fit and its estimated uncertainty are stored as the final countrate and error, respectively, for each pixel in the output image SCI and ERR arrays. In addition, the number of non-rejected data samples for each pixel and their total exposure time are stored in the SAMP and TIME arrays, respectively, of the final image.
Steps 1 and 3, which both involve combining data from overlapping images, have many common features. First, proper registration of the input images is accomplished by estimating the image-to-image offsets from world coordinate system (WCS) information contained in the image headers, and then applying a cross-correlation technique to further refine the offsets. The cross-correlation uses a ``minimum differences'' technique which seeks to minimize the difference in pixel values between two images. Second, shifting the images to their proper alignments is done by simple bi-linear interpolation. Third, the combining of pixels in overlap regions uses the input ERR array values to compute a weighted mean, rejects pixels flagged as bad in the DQ arrays, rejects outliers using iterative sigma clipping, and stores the number of non-rejected pixels and their total exposure time in the SAMP and TIME arrays, respectively, of the combined image.
The process of background measurement varies depending on the exact makeup of the image association that is being processed. If observations of background sky locations were obtained by using an observing pattern that includes chopping, then only these images are used to compute the background signal. If background images were not obtained, then an attempt is made to estimate the background from the target images, with an appropriate warning to the user that the background estimate may be biased by signal from the target. A scalar background signal level is measured for each image by computing its median signal level, excluding bad pixels and iteratively rejecting outliers from the computation. The resulting background levels for each image are then averaged together, again using iterative sigma clipping to reject discrepant values for individual images. The resulting average value is then subtracted from all images in the association, both background (if present) and target images. Provisions have also been made for subtracting a background reference image which could include spatial variations in the background signal across the NICMOS field of view, but to date no such spatial variations have been seen.
At the end of calnicb processing an updated version of the association table is created which contains information computed during processing, including the offsets for each image (relative to its reference image), and the scalar background level computed for each image. An example of such a table for a ``two-chop'' pattern is shown in Table 1. This pattern contains one position on the target and two separate background positions. Two images have been obtained at each position. The two images at each position are first combined, the background is measured from the combined images at each background position, the average background is subtracted from all images, and then three final images are produced, one for the target and one for each background position.
MEMNAME | MEMTYPE | BCKIMAGE | MEANBCK | XOFFSET | YOFFSET |
(DN/sec) | (pixels) | (pixels) | |||
n3uw01a1r | EXP-TARG | no | INDEF | 0.00 | 0.00 |
n3uw01a2r | EXP-TARG | no | INDEF | -0.15 | 0.00 |
n3uw01a3r | EXP-BCK1 | yes | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
n3uw01a4r | EXP-BCK1 | no | INDEF | 0.00 | 0.20 |
n3uw01a5r | EXP-TARG | no | INDEF | 0.32 | 0.00 |
n3uw01a6r | EXP-TARG | no | INDEF | 0.00 | 0.00 |
n3uw01a7r | EXP-BCK2 | yes | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
n3uw01a8r | EXP-BCK2 | no | INDEF | 0.00 | 0.12 |
n3uw01010 | PROD-TARG | no | INDEF | INDEF | INDEF |
n3uw01011 | PROD-BCK1 | no | INDEF | INDEF | INDEF |
n3uw01012 | PROD-BCK2 | no | INDEF | INDEF | INDEF |
Next: Enhanced HST Pointing and Calibration Accuracy: Generating HST Jitter Files at ST-ECF
Up: Dataflow and Scheduling
Previous: The Ground Support Facilities for the BeppoSAX Mission
Table of Contents -- Index -- PS reprint -- PDF reprint