Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.sao.ru/precise/Midas_doc/doc/95NOV/vol2/node386.html
Дата изменения: Fri Feb 23 12:58:18 1996
Дата индексирования: Tue Oct 2 18:04:35 2012
Кодировка:

Поисковые слова: holographic principle
An example of selection criteria



next up previous contents
Next: Association of Calibration Up: Association of images Previous: Creation of the

An example of selection criteria

Table gif shows a table of association rules that has been created to associate bias exposures with scientific frames. A column labeled :MJD_LOC has been created in the OST and contains a number derived from the Modified Julian Date of the exposure.

Each row of the column labeled :RANGE_1 defines the acceptable ``first choice" ranges for each of the four functions mentioned previously, and the combination of these four criteria defines the ``first choice" set of criteria. This may be expressed as:
Given a scientific exposure, select all dark exposures that satisfy:

The column RANGE_2 defines in the same way the set of ``second choice" criteria that can be expressed as:
Given a scientific exposure, select all dark exposures that satisfy:

The graphs of Figure gif illustrate the association of two dark exposures with each of two scientific images from our observing run: susi0006.bdf and susi0009.bdf. The association process when applying the set of criteria mentioned above will find two suitable candidates for susi0006.bdf satisfying the ``first choice" set of criteria. No ``first choice" candidates for susi0009.bdf will be found while five ``second choice" candidates may be selected. Because more importance is assigned to the time difference (weight=0.8) than to the detector temperature difference (weight=0.2), the files susi0001.bdf and susi0002.bdf will be flagged as the ``best" ones. (Note that the differences are computed in the units involved in the columns involved. In the given example they are degrees kelvin and days, respectively.)
A table of rules (Table gif) for associating flat-field exposures has been created following the same scheme. One criterion has to be added to the rules mentioned above: One has to make sure that one associates only frames obtained in the same instrument configuration (i.e in this case with the same filter). Figure gif shows that only one flat field can be associated with the frame susi0006.bdf (for clarity, only the FFs obtained with the same filter as the scientific image are numbered) while three suitable flat-fields may be selected for susi0009.bdf

  
Table: Rules for the association of DARK exposures (cf. Fig. gif and gif)

  
Table: Rules for the association of FF exposures (cf. Fig. gif and gif)



next up previous contents
Next: Association of Calibration Up: Association of images Previous: Creation of the



Rein Warmels
Mon Jan 22 15:08:15 MET 1996