: «Re: О различии ГРАВИТАЦИОННОЙ и ИНЕРТНОЙ МАСС...» (Александр Тимофеев)
:
: : : Я использовал запрещенный ортодоксами "ПОПУЛЯРИЗАТОРСКЙ прием" - ТЕРМИН "Квантование заряда" хотя ТЕРМИН "Квантование" уже застолблен и я им с их точки зрения не имею права пользоваться.
: :
: : Не понимаю. На мой взгляд, термины не являются чьей-либо собственностью. Используйте на здоровье.
:
: Ну а что ОКОЛОНАУЧНАЯ ПУБЛИКА имеет сказать по этому поводу?
:
Sergey Karavashkin wrote:
> "Aleksandr Timofeev" <@> wrote in message
news:<@>...
[Snip]
> Experts in NASA are now re-making the Hubble images,
> as in their previous interpretations we showed them
> their mistakes. Is there at least one who referred
> to our works? Should we speak of a pleasure,
> we would have to speak in other style and of other
> subjects, it should be other talk at all. To make of
> me a rara avis and a boy for beating, while now our
> ideas produce a revolution in the world science -
> spare me.
[Snip]
> They have no trustworthy work in their stock.
> And we can repeat for them Jesus' words:
> "Many will come and call themselves with My name".
>
«Квантование гравитационного заряда в Солнечной системе» (Александр Тимофеев, Numerologist)
The experience shows, that the electrical charges
of all elementary particles exactly are identical.
Probably nobody does not understand yet, why their
electrical charges are equal with a fancy degree of
an exactitude.
Obviously, that the quantization of an electrical
charge is the mysterious and universal law of a Nature.
In this article I demonstrate
quantization of a gravitational charge
being based on experimental data for magnitudes
of masses of planets of a Solar system.
«Re: Квантование гравитационного заряда в Солнечной системе - НА РУССКОМ» (Александр Тимофеев, Empiricist)
--------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Quantum Gravity Seminar - Fall 2004, Week 1
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 05:15:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: @ (John Baez)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research,sci.physics,sci.math
In the 2004-2005 academic year, the Quantum Gravity Seminar
at UCR is about gauge theory and topology. Derek Wise is
taking notes on my lectures.
In week 1:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-fall2004/f04week01.pdf
we continued our history of categories and physics from Born's
"probability interpretation" of Heisenberg's matrix mechanics,
to Feynman path integrals and Feynman diagrams. In retrospect,
expressing time evolution
exp(-itH)
as a limit of the nth power of the matrix (1 - itH/n) quickly
leads to Feynman path integrals.
We then quickly sketch Eilenberg and Mac Lane's basic work on
category theory. The climax of this episode came with Mac Lane's
discovery of monoidal and symmetric monoidal categories. These
were later seen to be the proper framework for understanding
Feynman diagrams and their diverse generalizations, from electrical
circuit diagrams to proof nets in logic.
A more detailed version of this history, still in draft form,
can be found in pages 6-13 of this paper:
A History of n-Categorical Physics
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-winter2005/history.pdf
There was a homework assignment on "Groups as Categories",
which begins to explain how categories generalize groups as
a framework for understanding symmetry:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-fall2004/categories1.pdf
You can see answers by Toby Bartels, Jeffrey Morton, Derek
Wise and Miguel Carrion Alvarez:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-fall2004/categori...
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-fall2004/categori...
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-fall2004/categori...
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-fall2004/categori...
Notes from the whole fall quarter can be found here:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-fall2004/
Notes from other sessions of the Quantum Gravity Seminar
are here:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/QG.html
--------------------------------------------------------
About distinction or difference between
GRAVITATIONAL MASS and INERT MASS... -
«О различии ГРАВИТАЦИОННОЙ и ИНЕРТНОЙ МАСС...» (Александр Тимофеев)
---
Kind regards,
Aleksandr |