: Ok, last message from me. You were told a lot of times, that Newton
: formula give deflection angle two times smaller then experimentally
: measured value. All calculations, that were given to you support this
: claim. In fact, the calculation given by Vyacheslav is very close to
: one you are always refering at and it gives you answer, which is again two
: times smaller. Then, you were tald that this calculation does not
: use an expression for kinetic energy at all - ok, I agree, that to understand this argument you should know mechanics at least at school
: level and you lack this knowledge. And finally the inverse problem
: you are always refering at could not be performed here. In order for you
: to understand this I give you kid's example. Suppose you add two numbers
: 2 and 3 and get 5. Now, knowing that at your "mind" experiment you get 5 tell me what numbers was added to get it.
:
-Здесь (http://www.ioffe.org/register/?doc=physica2/lect25.tex) другой случай:
Const=1''75/2
2Const=?
А эта задачка решается школьным способом.
Ваши амбициозные заявления о моих школьных и институтских знаниях ни разу не подтвердились аргументами. Это ставит Вас в неловкое положение ;)
Ваш А.Кушелев
P/S предлагаю продолжить тут: «Мысленный эксперимент Кушелева» (Александр Кушелев) |
» Альтернативный форум