: : Ok, I am sure that they are using E=mc2/2 in
: : calculation and not E=mc2 as written before it in text. Moreover, I checked my notes with other sources - in classics people always used E=mc2/2 ...
: :
: : And certainly different inputs could not give
: : the same answer :)
: :
: : About Guigens not now - there is work to be done, besides Vyacheslav already said that he will look for references ...
: :
: : And, as we are spending our time - we also expect
: : some input from you. So, I am waiting for you showing us that in quantum mechanics electron has acceleration on stationary orbirts - only serious
: : explanations will be considered ...
:
: -Правильно ли я понимаю, что в лекции:
:
: http://www.ioffe.org/register/?doc=physica2/lect25.tex
:
: содержится опечатка? Т.е. нужно исправить m=e/c2 на m=2e/c2 ?
:
: За расчет по Гюйгенсу заранее благодарю!
:
: Что касается ускорения электрона, то начнем с формы и размера электрона.
:
: Если электрон не имеет размера, соизмеримого с размером атома, то либо он должен находиться в ядре, либо двигаться, не так ли? Двигаться без ускорения по замкнутой орбите это - нонсенс.
:
: Еще Кеннет Снельсон (Kenneth Snelson) заметил, что упругость атомов и молекул требует упругости электронных оболочек. Принцип неопределенности тут не поможет...
:
: С уважением, Ваш А.Кушелев
Ok, the electron in hydrogen is described by wave
function, which is solution of Shrodinger equation.
You may plot it and see that it has size. I thought
you are going to define the acceleration for this
function. Who told you that it implies that electron is a point sitting inside nucleous? When people refering to point structure of electron they mean it does not have substructure, which could be seen for example in deep inelastic experiments.
I don't want discuss molecules - to me it is like
chemistry. I remember passing exam on nuclear physics some time ago and to tell the truth I was
not impressed by methods, which some people were using. But it has nothing to do with quantum mechanics in general. And if you want to discuss something - write some formula at least. Because if you write general words - then it is phylosophy. If you show pictures - then it is art. And to the moment, I don't really seen any science in what you are doing ...
отредактировано 01.02.2004 04:16 |