Measuring
the Fate of the Universe
As the Universe expands, gravity
pulls on the Universe, and slows the expansion down over time. As we look
to great distances, we are looking back in time. If we can measure how fast
the Universe is expanding in the past, and compare it to how fast it is
expanding now, we can see the total gravitational effect of all matter in
the Universe.
Here we plot the
distance between two galaxies as a function of time. Looking back into
the past we see that the galaxies get closer together until they are ontop
of each oth
If there is lots of
material, the Universe will be expanding much faster in the past --- it
will have slowed down a lot --- so much so that the Universe will eventually
halt in its expansion, start to contract, and eventually end in the gnaB
giB (that is the Big Bang backwards). In most models of the universe,
this type of Universe curves onto itself (like a sphere), and is finite.
If there isn't much material, the Universe will be expanding about the
same speed in the past as now, and will continue to expand forever. This
type of universe curves away from itself (like a saddle), and therefore
is without end, now, in the future, and even at the time of the Big Bang.
Here we once again
plot the distance between two galaxies as a funit e up, it will continue
to do so at an ever increasin
A favourite model
amongst theorists is for the Universe to be precariously balanced between
being finite and infinite. This balanced Universe is known as a critical
universe. Space neither curves away nor onto itself, it is flat, and is,
for most theorists infinite. A final possibility is that the Universe
has something other than gravity in it which accelerates the Universe
over time. It would be a mysterious substance indeed which did this!
2D representations
of the shape of the Universe. Universes with lots of material
We use Einstein's
equations of General Relativity to understand what we see in the Universe.
In addition to assuming his theory is right (it sure seems to be everywhere
we have be able to measure so far), we do have to make a few assumptions.
The most important of these are that the universe is homogenous (that
is, the material in the Universe is, on average, evenly spread through
out the Universe) and isotropic (matter, the expansion, and everything
else is the same in all directions that we look). With these assumptions
we can predict how bright an object will be given its rate of recession
(the simple relation found by Hubble breaks down at large distances).
If we can measure distances, we can see how these compare to the predictions
of General Relativity, and in this way we can see what is in the Universe,
and gauge how this material affects the Universe. It turns out this also
allows us to predict what the future holds for the Universe.
But to do this we need a way of measuring distances halfway across the
visible Universe. Measuring distances in astronomy is not trivial and
this process has lead to some of the greatest controversies in astronomy
over the past two hundred years. Galaxies, which are bright enough to
be seen to the great distances required, unfortunately, seem to evolve
over time, so comparing the size or brightness of galaxies we see today
to those in the distant Universe is fraught with danger. However, Type
Ia supernovae, which are individual stars, can also be seen to these great
distances, and these are what we have use to measure the Universe.
|