Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.ipa.nw.ru/conference/2002/sovet/PS/DESCAM.PS Дата изменения: Mon Aug 19 15:47:10 2002 Дата индексирования: Tue Oct 2 06:32:40 2012 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п

IAA Transactions, No. 8, ``Celestial Mechanics'', 2002
Connection between apparent and real orbits of a
binary system
P. Descamps
Institut de M'ecanique C'eleste et de Calcul des '
Eph'em'erides, Paris, France
In a binary system, each body describes about the other an elliptical apparent
orbit which is the projection of the real orbit on the tangential plane. Following
Kepler's first law (the primary is at one of the ellipse focus), and with a suited
choice of the two angles needed to define the orientation of the orbital plane in the
space, we can get in a closed form a simple expression in a polar representation, of
the apparent orbit as a function of the keplerian elements of the real orbit. In case
where the orbital plane of the secondary has a zero inclination over the equatorial
plane of the primary, these angles stand for the sub--Earth point latitude and the
position angle of the pole of the primary with respect to the north celestial pole.
These angles are generaly well known for solar system bodies and are given by
the physical ephemerides.
In reality, none system follows exactly the Kepler's first law owing to the grav­
itational perturbations due to primary's oblateness and by the massive bodies ---
especially the giant planets and the Sun. However their effects become noticeable
only after a couple of days. On the other hand, depending on the distance to the
Earth, the apparent aspect of the orbit will change as the Earth will travel on its
path. Therefore, if we have some observations performed over a few consecutive
days (case of a solar system body), we can safely consider that they are distribut­
ed over a same projected Keplerian orbit which is the osculating orbit defined
as the orbit that would be followed if the perturbing force were instantaneously
turned off.
Our method can then be used to provide a prelimary orbit determination.
This always provides two solutions that are symmetric (one direct and one retro­
grade), since the inclination of the orbital plane (or the direction of the angular
momentum vector) cannot be determined unambiguously from a single epoch ob­
servation. Initial estimates of the five orbital elements involved are easily found
and convergence is achieved after a few iterations with a fitting algorithm based
on the Levenberg--Marquardt technique.
55

Thanks to the adaptive optics technique, we can now detect more and more
close binary systems among asteroids and TNO but also close faint satellites of
planets, not separable so far. In such systems the secondary orbits so quickly
the primary that we can apply our method provided that observations are well
distributed over the orbit. Moreover if we have at least two epochs of observation,
we can derive for each of them the location of the pericenter in the orbit and
consequently directly measure the apsidal rate which is mainly related to the
non--spherical shape of the primary.
This method has been succesfully applied to a small satellite of Uranus, Puck
[1], and to the satellite of the asteroid 22 Kalliope [2] (fig. 1). It has been adapted
to the case of the binary stars as well.
­0.5 0.0 0.5
Dacosd (arcsec)
­0.5
0.0
0.5
Dd
(arcsec)
E
N
W
­0.5 0.0 0.5
Dacosd (arcsec)
­0.5
0.0
0.5
Dd
(arcsec)
E
N
W
October 2001 November 2001
Fig. 1. Orbit of the secondary of (22) Kalliope on October and November 2001.
Nodal line and location of the pericenter are plotted.
References
1. Descamps P., Marchis F., Berthier J., Prang'e R., Fusco T., Le Guyader C.
First ground--based astrometric observations of Puck. C.R. Physique, 2002,
3, 121--128.
2. Marchis F., Descamps P., Hestroffer D., Berthier J., Boccaletti A., De Pa­
ter I., Gavel D. A three--dimensional solution for the orbit of the satellite of
the asteroid (22) Kalliope. Icarus, 2002 (submitted).
56