Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес
оригинального документа
: http://www.badastronomy.com/bitesize/sn87a_innerring.html
Дата изменения: Unknown Дата индексирования: Sat Apr 9 23:11:23 2016 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: 3 |
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buy My Stuff |
Supernova 1987A: The Inner RingWeek of March 13, 2000 Last week I talked about what the outer layers of the precursor to SN87A were doing in the thousands of years before the explosion. Basically, they were being shed in two phases: a slow dense wind, which was shaped like a squashed sphere, and a fast lower density wind, which swept up the slower wind. We knew something like this was going on before Hubble pointed its somewhat bleary eye towards 87A in 1990. Observations from another orbiting telescope made it pretty clear that there was something surrounding the star, though we didn't know what. That 'scope didn't take pictures, but instead was able to tell us that something around 87A was putting out lots of ultraviolet light. Scientists at the time knew that the light was coming from gas that was being lit up by the bright light of the new supernova, but the shape of the gas was not known. Everybody assumed a sphere, or maybe a slightly oblate sphere.
The problem was those two outer rings. When you collide winds, it's very hard to get a thick inner ring and two outer ones. A lot of theories cropped up, some of them pretty wacky, but none really did a good job explaining how those rings formed. We still are not exactly sure, ten years later! My role in all this was fun. As I said, I was looking for a degree topic at the time, and Roger Chevalier offered me a position analyzing Hubble data. He was part of a group called SINS, for Supernova INtensive Survey. The plan was to use Hubble to learn everything we could about supernovae, and 87a was just the first. Hubble was still a month from launch when I said yes, and I was just as downtrodden as all the other astronomers when we found out the mirror was flawed. We got two simple images of the supernova and that was it. The defocus in the mirror meant a lot of delays in projects, and ours was in that category, So from April 1990 to June 1992 all I had were those two images.
The images I worked with proved valuable in our understanding of the ring. It helped the SINS project, too: we had the only detailed time-based series of observations of an object that was fading away before our eyes, so it was easy to defend getting more observations. The head SINner, Bob Kirshner, was able to use that fact to make sure we got the observations we needed. ``My'' images were later superseded by ones taken with the repaired telescope, and we learned even more. Since then we've upgraded Hubble with better instruments and observed the ring over and over again. As a matter of fact, it was an observation of the ring using one of Hubble's new instruments that showed us the ring still had some surprises waiting for us... and (you guessed it) more about that next week. Are you a glutton for punishment? Then take a look at the paper I published about all this data. It's very technical; but then, it's basically my PhD thesis!
|
|