Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.atnf.csiro.au/whats_on/workshops/synthesis2003/talks/antenna.pdf Дата изменения: Thu May 22 04:55:13 2003 Дата индексирования: Wed Dec 26 09:03:36 2007 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п

The antenna element Ravi ATNF, Narrabri

1. 2.

The role of the antenna in a Fourier synthesis radio telescope The Compact array antenna.

SIW 2003


The radio sources in the sky foreground, background, discrete, extended -> Electromagnetic field on the ground that rushes past us at the speed of light.

Sources on the sky cause an EM field on the ground.


Radio source
Sources appear to have different angular sizes



Different sources have different radio spectra: continuum & line (/)

EM field on the ground has 3D spatial "structure"


Radio sources on the sky

c/()

c/()

c
EM field on the ground


The time variations of the electric field are the same at nearby points in 3D space

And different far away

Examining the similarity (coherence) properties of the EM field on the ground tells us the structure and spectra of sources in the sky


How the telescope works: 1. The antenna measures the EM field at its location on the ground and converts it into a voltage waveform in a cable. 2. The receivers magnify the voltage signal. 3. The correlator compares these field voltages
at the different antenna locations and at different times and computes the degree of similarity => visibilities. brightness distribution & spectrum

4. Miriad works out the radio


Parabolic reflector:

A parabolic reflector adds all the fields from a surface = aperture at a focal point.


Hyperbolic reflector:

. B

. A

Light from the point A reflecting off the hyperbola appears to come from point B


Hyperbolic reflector:

B

A

Light converging towards B reflecting off the hyperbola converges at A


Parabolic reflector


Hyperbolic reflector Parabolic reflector


Parabolic primary & Hyperbolic secondary: `Cassegrain' antenna

Newton's comments on the Cassegrain design: "....You see therefore, that the advantages of this design are none; but the disadvantages so great and unavoidable that I fear it will never be put in practice with good effect" Phil. Trans. Royal. Soc. London. 7, 4056 (1672)


·Cassegrain configuration ·22-m diameter primary main reflector ·2.75-m secondary
reflector

AT antenna:


Signal path:


The antenna collects the E-field over the aperture at the focus The focus is a fixed spot at all frequencies. The reflector antenna is achromatic.

the feed horn at the focus adds the fields and gives the sum to the receiver as a voltage.


Feed horns: at the focus located in the vertex room of the

· · · ·

antenna

4.4-9.2 GHz = C & X bands 1.25-2.5 GHz = L & S bands

MNRF upgrade: 16-25 GHz = K band 85-115 GHz = W bands

X

The feeds are mounted on a rotating turret.


Feeds are `compact' and `corrugated' horns
The inner profile is curved The inner surface has grooves

Cross-section of a horn


Sub-reflector

28 main-reflector Feed horn

O

`optical axis'

The feed horn adds all the rays that come from the 28 deg. wide sub-reflector.


The feed down-weights rays that come off-axis.
Rays 9 deg. off-axis are down-weighted by factor 2. Rays 14 deg. off-axis are down-weighted by factor 6.


The feed down-weights rays that come off-axis. Therefore the main and sub-reflectors have been SHAPED (the surfaces are not exactly parabolic/hyperbolic) 1. more numbers of rays are gathered from the edge of the sub-reflector=edge of the main reflector. 2. the ray paths all have equal length and the rays from the aperture surface arrive at the focus `in-phase'


The shaped reflectors gather more rays from the edge

This compensates for the lower weight that the feed gives to off axis rays.


Resulting sensitivity of the antenna across the aperture

3.6 m
0

| 12

| 10

| 8

| 6

| 4

| 2

| 2

| 4

| 6

| 8

| 10

| 12

Radial distance (m)


Instead of measuring the similarity (coherence) between the EM fields at two points in space, in practice, the interferometer measures the coherence between the EM fields averaged over two regions of space = antenna apertures.


V1(t) E( r1 )

V2(t) E( r2 )

V1 x V2 ( E( r1 ) ) x ( E( r2 ) )
( E( r1 ) x E( r2 ) )

The interferometer measures the summation of the coherence between every element of aperture 1 with every element of aperture 2.


The measurement of the coherence between one pair of aperture elements => a single point measurement on the u,v - plane visibility plane spatial_frequency plane.


The measurement of the coherence between every pair of aperture elements => an average measurement over a region of the u,v - plane visibility plane spatial_frequency plane.

The shape of the region = the cross-correlation of the voltage weighting patterns in the two apertures.



For a source offset from the antenna pointing centre by angle = / (2d) radians

The phase of the complex coherence function winds through 2 radians across the sampled region in the visibility plane. And the interferometer will give zero measurement.


The amount of cancellation depends on the ·Antenna optics and ·Distance of a source from the antenna pointing centre.

@ 30 GHz


Ideally, the antenna sums the EM field vectors over the aperture in phase. But if 1. the optics is out of focus 2. the feed or SR is off axis 3. the MR is deformed (elevation dependent gravity deformation) 4. the reflector surfaces have small scale irregularities The EM fields will not be in phase when they propagate from the aperture plane to the feed. The cancellation will result in a loss of signal. The loss might depend on the position of the source.


`Holography'

Antenna scanning satellite

Reference antenna tracking satellite


Surface deviation map:


Panel adjustments


After adjustments:


Before

=0.62 mm

After

=0.17 mm


Loss in antenna sensitivity due to surface irregularities: Kg = cos2 () Twice the reflector surface rms in wavelengths

=0.17 mm
Kg

3 cm band 4 deg. 12 mm band 8 deg. 3 mm band 40 deg.

0.996 0.98 0.57


90

o

75

o

30

o

Gravity deformation of the antenna: Measured using photogrammetry Correction proposed using tilts to the SR
15
o