Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/radio-school/2010/lectures/DMcC-pol_lecture.pdf
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Thu Sep 30 08:37:50 2010
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Mon Feb 14 00:27:18 2011
Êîäèðîâêà:

Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï
VLA @ 8.5 GHz B-vectors

Perley & Carilli (1996)

10 kpc

Polarimetry
Dave McConnell, CASS Radio Astronomy School, Narrabri 30 September 2010

1
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Electro-magnetic waves are polarized
E
S = c/4 (E â H)

H

·

S

E/M waves have direction, amplitude, frequency and polarization

Poynting vector S = c/4 (E â H)
2
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Outline of lecture
· · · · ·
Thursday, 30 September 2010

Polarization - what is it? How is it described Origins of polarized light How is it important to astrophysics How is it measured

3


Polarized waves: linear

4
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Polarized waves: linear

4
Thursday, 30 September 2010


... at any angle


5
Thursday, 30 September 2010


or Circular - LCP, RCP
Right

6
Thursday, 30 September 2010


or Circular - LCP, RCP
Right

6
Thursday, 30 September 2010


or Circular - LCP, RCP
Right

6
Thursday, 30 September 2010


or Circular - LCP, RCP
Left Right

6
Thursday, 30 September 2010


IEEE Standard 211, 1969

IAU resolution, 1973

7
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Linear as sum of circulars

8
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Linear as sum of circulars

8
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Other combinations
· ·
The sum of two circular waves of unequal amplitude will have elliptical polarization. The sum of two orthogonal linears with phase difference 0 < < /2 will also have elliptical polarization.

9
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Polarization ellipse
y




Ex


Ey x

· · · · ·

tan = Ey / Ex tan 2 = tan 2 cos sin 2 = sin 2 sin is the position angle is the ellipticity

10
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Stokes description
· ·
Defined by George Stokes in 1852 Adopted for astronomy by Chandrasehkar (1949) in the solution of radiative transfer problems.

11
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Stokes parameters
· · · · · ·
For monochromatic waves I : total intensity Q : linear U : linear V : circular I2 = Q2 + U2 + V2

12
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Stokes parameters
· · · · · ·
For monochromatic waves I : total intensity Q : linear U : linear V : circular I2 = Q2 + U2 + V2

12
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Linear : Q and U
>0 <0 >0 <0

Q
(U = 0)
13
Thursday, 30 September 2010

U
(Q = 0)


Linear : Q and U
Q>0 Q<0 Q<0 U<0 Q<0 U>0
14
Thursday, 30 September 2010

U>0

U<0 U>0

Q>0


The PoincarÈ sphere

15
Thursday, 30 September 2010


The PoincarÈ sphere

15
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Partial polarization
·
Two monochromatic signals summed:
different frequencies different polarization ellipses

· ·

16
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Partial polarization
·
Two monochromatic signals summed:
different frequencies different polarization ellipses

· ·

16
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Pancharatnam's extension
V -U Q U -V
17
Thursday, 30 September 2010

S -Q

· · · ·

Radius represents I S = (Q,U,V) |S| I Unpolarized radiation (I - S) at centre .


Stokes parameters
· · · · · ·
For finite bandwidth radiation I : total intensity Q : linear U : linear V : circular I2 Q2 + U2 + V2

18
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Polarized light

19
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Polarized light
·
Loss of symmetry

19
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Polarized light
· ·
Loss of symmetry Polarized radiation

19
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Polarized light
· · ·
Loss of symmetry Polarized radiation Polarization-dependent propagation

· · ·

reflection scattering birefringence
19

Thursday, 30 September 2010


Scattering
· · ·
Light from the day time sky is sun light "Rayleigh scattered" by molecules in the atmosphere. Sky light is polarized, maximally at 90 degrees to the sun. The CMB is expected to be partially polarized because of Thompson scattering

20
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Birefringence
Birefringence occurs when light passes through anisotropic material whose refractive index differs for the two polarization modes.

Linear modes birefringent
Thursday, 30 September 2010

21

Circular modes birefringent


Zeeman

22
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Synchrotron
+

a

23
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Synchrotron
+

a

-

a
23
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Synchrotron
+

a

a
23
Thursday, 30 September 2010

+

-

B


Faraday rotation

24
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Faraday rotation
Magnetised plasmas are birefringent: the two circular modes have refractive index dependent on the parallel component of the magnetic field, the electron density, and the wave frequency. The relative phase of the two modes changes along the propagation path, and so does the position angle of the resultant linearly polarized radiation. = RM
2

24
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Faraday rotation
Magnetised plasmas are birefringent: the two circular modes have refractive index dependent on the parallel component of the magnetic field, the electron density, and the wave frequency. The relative phase of the two modes changes along the propagation path, and so does the position angle of the resultant linearly polarized radiation. = RM
2

24
Thursday, 30 September 2010


How is it measured?

25
Thursday, 30 September 2010


How is it measured?
Measures Ey

Measures Ex

25
Thursday, 30 September 2010


How is it measured?
Measures Ey

Measures Ex

25
Thursday, 30 September 2010


How is it measured?
Measures Ey

Measures Ex

25
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Imaging
· ·
I, Q, U and V are equivalent for aperture synthesis imaging, but for the possibility (certainty) of negative Q, U,V. We can define and measure visibilities for each of the Stokes quantities: for antennas p and q : Ex2 ExpExq , Ex Ey ExpEyq , etc

26
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Mars at 22GHz

credit: Myers/Perley, NRAO 27
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Mars at 22GHz
Q U

credit: Myers/Perley, NRAO 27
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Why is it so difficult?
· · ·
Depolarization leads to weak signals Conceptual difficulties - it is complicated Instrumental effects can be significant and difficult to separate from the signal

28
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Instrumental imperfections
· · ·
Leakage - a little Ex detected in y-feed, ... phase errors (in general, complex gain variations) polarization response varies within the beam

29
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Jones calculus
vx vy
Rec

30
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Jones calculus
vx vy
Rec

30
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Mueller calculus
Correlate
Rec

Measured visibilities

Rec

=

4 x 4 matrix

31
Thursday, 30 September 2010


References
· · · · · · ·
Radhakrishnan. Polarisation. URSI proceedings (1990) pp. 34 Hamaker et al. Understanding radio polarimetry. I. Mathematical foundations. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement (1996) vol. 117 pp. 137 Sault et al. Understanding radio polarimetry. II. Instrumental calibration of an interferometer array. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement (1996) vol. 117 pp. 149 Hamaker et al. Understanding radio polarimetry. III. Interpreting the IAU/ IEEE definitions of the Stokes parameters. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement (1996) vol. 117 pp. 161 Heiles et al. Mueller Matrix Parameters for Radio Telescopes and Their Observational Determination. The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (2001) vol. 113 pp. 1274 Born and Wolf: `Principle of Optics', Chapters 1 and 10 Presentations from previous Synthesis Schools (Ohja, 2003; Perley 2006

32
Thursday, 30 September 2010


Polarisation a tutorial by V. Radhakrishnan
33
Thursday, 30 September 2010