Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.atnf.csiro.au/management/atuc/2012july/docs/ATUC_July_2012_NMG.pdf Дата изменения: Wed Jul 11 03:01:57 2012 Дата индексирования: Tue Feb 5 11:46:59 2013 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: m 101

Parkes Future Receiver Discussions
Naomi McClure Griffiths 11 July 2012


Parkes Receivers Interim (2012 2014?)

Need to address an:cipated receiver usage
· Group of Astros met in May to brainstorm future projects · Assume current instrumenta6on
Fig 1, from CarreA & Bock report Feb 2012

2 Parkes Receiver Discussions | Naomi McClure Griffiths


Known Current/Future Projects
PROJECT RECEIVER(S) TIME ESTIMATES

Considered:
· On going large projects · Known future large projects · Major possible projects · Smaller possible projects · VLBI requiring Parkes

Major Pulsar Timing SPLASH OH Galac6c Plane HIRTUN (finishing) Major

Known 10/50 & H OH H OH Mul6beam Planned

Projects 1000's 2000 500 Projects 1000's

Deep HI mapping Mul6beam/ HIPSR

3 Parkes Receiver Discussions | Naomi McClure Griffiths


Future Project Brainstorming
PROJECT RECEIVER(S) TIME ESTIMATES

Major Possible Projects HII Recomb Discovery Methanol Absorp:on Ammonia Galac:c Plane (?) GMIMS Hi band (?) Smaller Possible LUNASKA CH Mapping Galac:c Centre Galaxy Clusters con:nuum Anomalous Dust emission Transient 2 dish follow up Pulsars at GC (if found) :ming? VLBI projects Maser Parallax Maser Parallax II if ATCA upgrade Pulsar parallax TANAMI Fermi sources 6.6 GHz Ku (12.2 GHz) H OH/Galileo 8/22 GHz 100's 1000's 100's 1000's 100's 1000 Mul:beam 10/50 H OH, 10cm (Galileo) 8 20 GHz ? 20 GHz 100's ? 100's 100's 100's Mars (8 GHz) Ku (12 GHz) 22 GHz DRAO 1000 1000 1000's 500

4 Parkes Receiver Discussions | Naomi McClure Griffiths


Project summary
· Dominant receivers:
­ 10/50, Mul6beam, H OH

· 13mm, Ku and maybe Mars may be required to be iden6fied at TAC process
­ The possible major projects are specula6ve

· VLBI requirements overlap with H OH, 13mm and Mars
­ Note 6.6. GHz VLBI requirement could be replaced with 12.2GHz if ATCA upgrade pushed to 12.2 GHz

· Future discussions to focus on science cases for ~20cm PAF and wideband 0.7 4 GHz and 4 24 GHz receivers
­ Possible large projects in both bands

5 Parkes Receiver Discussions | Naomi McClure Griffiths


A NMMc G suggesGon
· Offer Mul6beam 10/50 and H OH every term · Rotate 13mm, Ku, Mars and Galileo on pre announced term schedule, such as:
TERM 13APR 13OCT 14APR 14OCT X X 13MM X X X X X GALILEO KU MARS X

6 Parkes Receiver Discussions | Naomi McClure Griffiths


Advice on prioriGes Parkes
Other opBons? Is it agreed that the high frequency mulBbeam is the lower priority of the three consideraBons? We are likely to invesBgate both, but if there was a preference for invesBgaBng wideband or PAF which would it be? We feel our wideband approach is less risky than the `all eggs in one basket ' consideraBon of the lower frequency receiver only. Comments.

7 Parkes Receiver Discussions | Naomi McClure Griffiths


Advice on prioriGes ATCA
For later, but start thinking now ­ the case for going to 12.2 GHz on the Compact Array

8 Parkes Receiver Discussions | Naomi McClure Griffiths