Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес
оригинального документа
: http://www.arcetri.astro.it/science/chianti/chianti_3.03/elements/fe/fe_11.html
Дата изменения: Thu Jul 20 21:44:18 2000 Дата индексирования: Sat Dec 22 14:07:06 2007 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: п п п п п п п п п п п п п п |
%energy levels(12,13,41): Jupen et al., MNRAS, 264, 627, 1993 %energy levels: NIST Database for Atomic Spectroscopy, Version 1.0, NIST Standard Reference Database 61, 1995. %theoretical energy levels 1-9: Gupta & Tayal, 1999, ApJ, 5`0, 1078 %theoretical energy levels: Bhatia & Doschek (1996), ADNDT,64, 183 %produced as part of the Arcetri/Cambridge/NRL atomic data base collaboration 'CHIANTI' by P.R. Young Feb. 1996 & Enrico Landi Apr. 1999 %comment: The third column of energies contains scaled superstructure values. Have had problems with the identification of some of the Fe XI lines. The following are proprosed. Level 37 has been proprosed as giving the 188.30 line (Jupen et al.). Don't think this is right, as the 3P2 - 3S1 transition is quite weak. Can not find any lines which correspond to the 3S1 transitions, so have put the scaled superstructure value in. Level 38 (3P2) is identified from the strong line at 188.23. Level 39 (1P1) is identified as the strong line at 188.30. There's only one line from level 40 (3P0), whose identification I'm uncertain about (near 189.10 AA?). Have used the scaled superstructure energy relative to the 3P1 level. Level 41 (3P1) has been identified from the 184.704 line seen by Jupen et al., two other transitions from this level match up nicely with the 189.123 and 189.733 lines seen by Behring et al.(1976).
%collision strengths: Bhatia AK & Doschek GA, ADNDT 64, 183, 1996 % effective collision strengths levels 1-9: Gupta & Tayal, 1999, ApJ, 510, 1081 %comment: Selected transitions have been fitted in order to reproduce the level balance of the complete collisional data. Essentially all significant collision strengths involving the levels 1-5 and 14,20,23,24,25,30. This file contains fits to the SCALED Bhatia omega data. It was found that the 4 configuration collisional model does not accurately predict some important collision strengths, so it was decided to scale all the 3s2 3p2 - 3s2 3p 3d collision strengths (for which there was a corresponding oscillator strength) by the factor: (accurate "superstructure" oscillator strength) ----------------------------------------------- (original Bhatia oscillator strength) In particular, this improves the agreement of the 188.22, 188.30 lines with theory. % % produced as part of the Arcetri/Cambridge/NRL atomic data base collaboration 'CHIANTI' % % P.R.Young 30-Aug-97 and E.Landi 8-Apr-99
%Produced for the CHIANTI atomic database by Peter Young, 7-Jul-2000. contact: pyoung@cfa.harvard.edu %A values: Obtained from a 13 configuration model of Fe XI used in "superstructure", see comment below %comment: The configurations used were: 3s2 3p4, 3s 3p5, 3s2 3p3 3d, 3p6 3s2 3p3 {4s, 4p, 4d, 4f} 3s 3p4 3d, 3s2 3p2 3d2 3p5 3d, 3s 3p3 3d2, 3s2 3p 3d3 The most striking difference between this model and the 4 conf model occurs for the (2D*) 3P1, 3S1 and 1P1 levels. Essentially, the 3S1 level is pushed closer to the other two levels, increasing the amount of interaction between them. The data below, from "superstructure" shows this. The first column gives the levels; the second and third the theoretical energies for the 4 conf model and the 13 conf model; the next three columns give the percentage contributions of the three levels to each other: "a/b" means a is percentage for 4 conf model, while b is percentage for 13 conf model. 3S1 3P1 1P1 3S1 532878 547264 97/71 -/- -/10 3P1 555764 553263 1/14 50/42 11/7 1P1 564755 542936 -/12 21/16 17/16 Clearly the change of energies gives rise to different interactions. Most notably, 1P1 starts mixing with 3S1, whereas it did not before