Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.arcetri.astro.it/~salinari/ELT/Detection%20of%20extrasolar%20planets_final.pdf Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Mon Nov 3 19:20:25 2003 Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 04:37:12 2016 Êîäèðîâêà: Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: optical telescope

Detection of extrasolar planets
Not a good title for ELT (will be done before)! I will "limit" myself to the Possibility of studying terrestrial exoplanets Key words are studying (spectrum, time variability, polarization . . .) and terrestrial
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 1


An OWL reference on the subject:
"Critical science with the largest telescopes: science drivers for a 100m ground-based optical-IR telescope"
T. G. Hawarden, D.Dravins, G.F.Gilmore, R.Gilmozzi, O.Hainaut, K. Kuijken, B.Leibundgut, M.R.Merrifield, D.Queloz & R.F.G.Wyse

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4840 " ...The exo-Jupiter in Fig. 6 is detected [in J] at hundreds of sigma [in 10,000 s] (high resolution spectroscopy of this object could be secured in a night) and the exo-Earth is detected at around 10 sigma (for albedos of 0.7 and 0.4 respectively). While a 30-m will be hard put to detect an earth beyond ~3pc, OWL's range should be 25Pc. A year's observing would allow a census of the 2600-odd stars (including 360 "solar type single F, G, K stars) within this radius, yielding orbital parameters for innumerable planets."
Marseille ELT science meeting

I Iwill try to show that performances similar to will try to show that performances similar to those quoted in italic seems to be achievable those quoted in italic seems to be achievable by aasuitably designed ELT by suitably designed ELT
2

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets


the logics of this presentation
First we will see how far Physics allows to go in studying extrasolar earth-like planets. Physics means: how turbulence induced wavefront phase errors, star photon fluxes, wind speed, etc. combine in limiting the AO PSF contrast. In practice: · Assuming reasonably good conditions: r0(V) = 20 cm, =10 m/s · We can calculate a PSF with the semi-analitical method of Jolissaint-Veran 2001, · We can tune up the actuator density for good performances in < one arcesc field: · We can calculate a plausible AO PSF contrast to see what we could do with it. · We will see that the potential for extrasolar research is very good. Initially I will neglect · Scintillation · Speckle-noise · Diffraction effects · Segmentation effects
Marseille ELT science meeting

But later I will briefly discuss some important implications of the initially neglected effects
P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

At the end I will say what I think about technical feasibility aspects
3


Scattering of light by Residual Wavefront (phase) Error (RWE)
The RWE, i.e. the "leftovers" of the (phase) AO correction, scatters light around the star proportionally to the Phase Power Spectral Density of the total RWE (total includes the effects of "fitting", "phase lag", "photon noise", "aliasing", etc. errors). In other words: · The RWE at spatial wavelength W scatters light of wavelength at an angle = /W at ~ 0.1 arcsec, in V band W ~1 m, in K band W ~4 m, 1-4 m scales are critical · As with a given actuator separation we can correct the wavefront error only at W> 2 , there is always a non-corrected part of the RWE spectrum (W < 2 ), that produces (by aliasing) further contamination of the corrected part. · The correction must extend well beyond the spatial frequency of interest (W= / ). (In other words: << /2 ) · The scattered light intensity I at angle is proportional to the RWE phase variance 2(W) at the corresponding W. I() 2(W) = 2(/ )

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

4


AO halo shape (adapted from Jolissaint and Veran 2001)
Residual phase power spectrum After AO correction Before AO correction Not corrected by AO

AO corrected PSF 20 m telescope =1.65 µm r0()=90 cm =90 cm Airy pattern, (next ennemy)

Not corrected halo

Aliased error

Critical spatial frequency fc=1/Wc=1/2

Critical field angle c= /Wc= /2 The profile of the "halo" The profile of the "halo" is not Lorenzian. . is not Lorenzian

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

5


Result: V band AO PSF (theoretical contrast)
Planet/star flux ratio and angular separation for known exoplanets compared with telescope PSF (Lardiere et Al. 2003) A) even a 100 m telescope cannot resolve some of the known planets from their stars. B) A one arcsec field radius includes most known planets C) Exo-earths, at best distance, are about three orders of magnitude below the scattered light background
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 6


Stellar sample size (choose your telescope and location)

With a ~ 30 m telescope (at "Mauna Kea") one can explore at short wavelength the entire TPF (goal) sample of ~ 100 stars in 1000 hours With a 100 m telescope in "Antarctica" one can obtain R > 1000 spectra of the TPF sample at short wavelength (R to K) in 1000 hours
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

TPF~100

7


What you can do with different telescope sizes (L) @ "Dome C" (Lardiere et Al. 2003)
Example (see black arrow) The Sun-Earth system At 10 PC Would be detected In J filter (RJ = 4) By a 50 m (sq) telescope with 2.5x105 actuators In ten hours At S/N ~ 30. (in 6 min at S/N 3) Spectroscopy with S/N ~ 5 (per sp. el) At R=144 [R= RJ *(30/5)2] Would also require About ten hours
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 8


What you can get with different telescope sizes (L) @ Mauna Kea (Lardiere et Al. 2003)
Same Solar case, Same arrow (factor 10) Same performances Now one needs: A 100 m (sq) telescope with ~ 106 actuators

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

9


Which planets the competition could see from the two sites with a 30 m telescope? (Lardiere et Al. 2003)

Not bad! 10 hours for an Earth at 10 Pc (at 3 ) from MK, 1 hour from Dome C

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

10


What happens at other wavelengths? (Lardiere et Al. 2003)
Going to longer wavelengths the increasing r0/ compensates the decreasing /D. An option for L band at Dome C, where the thermal background is reduced by 10-3! V is not at all bad, R, I, J are optimum. B and U should be explored, could be used for diagnostics of many non-terrestrial planets (or maybe even terrestrial ones. . .)

U L B

Mauna Kea

Dome C

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

11


Some more technicalities (Lardiere et Al. 2003)
Effect of different actuator separation

Selecting the best For Mauna kea (10 cm) And for Dome C (Again, indipendently, 10 cm) Going from =10 cm to =40cm (adequate for S ~ 0.8 in J) changes the exo-earths detection treshold by one order of magnitude. (detection time by two orders of magnitude)
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 12


A few words on the neglected AO effects
The effects on contrast of intensity fluctuation on the pupil (scintillation) are similar but much smaller than those of phase "corrugation". Scintillation can be controlled in a Multiconjugate AO System, but at the cost of adding complexity (and some extra residual phase error). In the following I assume that scintillation is removed by correcting phase errors in a MCAO scheme, IF NECESSARY (work is in progress). If there are slowly varying terms in the residual wf error, part of the the scattered light will concentrate in speckles, making the detection of planets much more difficult. There are ways of avoiding the formation of specles that allow achieving a Signal to Noise ratio limited by "Poisson" photon noise, although this may require a COMPLEX "planet finder" instrument.

(see Angel 2002)

More work is certainly needed on both above subjects, but Poisson fluctuations of the rate of arrival of the photons scattered by residual wavefront phase error

remain the main AO limitation to the study of exoplanets
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 13


The ennemies of Extreme Contrast
Many factors work against the study of terrestrial exoplanets from the ground: 1. Atmospheric turbulence (only partially corrected by Adaptive Optics) 2. Diffraction effects · By pupil outher edge (largely curable by pupil shape choice + coronagraphy) · By pupil inner edge (smaller effect, but more difficult to cure. · By secondary support structure (spikes only in a few directions) · By primary (and other) mirror segmentation (a variety of small, but nasty, effects) 3. Vibrations of optical components 4. Non uniform reflectivity (amplitude variations) 5. Scattering by defects, edges, dust . . . Only N 1 is specific of groundbased telescopes (and is the worst ennemy). All · · · the other effects are in principle tractable by appropriate telescope design choices coronagraphyc techniques severe tolerancing
P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

Done with N1. Done with N1. We roughly know what AO could do: We roughly know what AO could do:

Not bad! Not bad!

Marseille ELT science meeting

14


diffraction effects
Various coronagraphyc techniques can reduce the light diffracted out of the peak, But · Complex pupil shape is a problem · Chromatism is another problem · High contrast translates in high light loss Therefore, to make the problem manageable, · make the pupil as "clean" as possible · don't ask for extreme contrast increase

4 Quadrant vs. Lyot ~ 12 mag contrast

JWST, TRW version, MIRI (Obs. Paris)
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 15


OWL-like pupil, R band
100m diameter, 10mm gap, 1.6m side-to-side hexagonal segments 33% obscuration

PSF at 700 nm computed by A Riccardi Following the analytical approach of Yaitskova_et_Al_2002,

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

16


71 m square pupil, R band
100m diagonal ~ same area as OWL 1.6m side square segments 10mm gap, 10% obscuration

PSF at 700 nm computed by A Riccardi Following the analytical approach of Yaitskova_et_Al_2002,

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

17


Comparison of the 700 nm profiles

3x10

3

10 10-7 AO contrast

2

Black, no gaps
Marseille ELT science meeting

Red, 10mm gaps
P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

Green, 23nm rms wf piston

Coronagraphy can remove most of the structure,

BUT NOT PISTON
18


Is Piston Error the show stopper?
Piston errors send light mostly within an angle ~ /d (d=segment size) To reduce the piston problem we could: · use much larger segments, to obtain ~ 20-30 mas (d >5 m at V) (doesnt work at longer wavelength) · use much smaller segments, to obtain > 1000 mas (d< 0.2 m at V) (this works well in principle, but the number of segments diverges and their control becomes a new big problem) · reduce piston rms error by ~ an order of magnitude (from ~20 nm to ~ 2 nm wf) Scaling from Esposito et Al. 2003 one finds that 2 nm rms WF differential piston error can be measured by a Pyramid WFS on a star of mag ~ 8 with sufficient bandwidth (tens of Hz) to control segment vibrations and atmospheric terms.

Differential segment piston can (MUST) be controlled adaptively!
No show stopper No show stopper Only another job for AO Only another job for AO
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 19


so ... what type of AO is needed to study exo-earths?
Appropriate wf corrector(s): · · A very high order corrector ( ~ 10 cm, > 2 kHz bandwidth, any conjugation) The high order corrector MUST be segmented to control segment piston this has profound (positive?) implications on many AO parameters Possibly a medium order corrector at a high conjugate to control scintillation

And, in addition: · · · A Piston sensitive wavefront sensor (Pyramid WFS, for instance) Large, fast WFS detectors A lot of computing power (maybe)
Facts end here Facts end here (the following are opinions) (the following are opinions) I Ibelieve we can have all of the above in aadecent believe we can have all of the above in decent timeframe, as the basic technology already exists timeframe, as the basic technology already exists
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 20


Opinions on segmented correctors

If a typical segment is ~ 2 m2 we only need ~ 200 DoF per segment. The problem is NOT in the corrector size or complexity, but in accuracy of correction, gap size, edge effects, speed, reliability, cost . . . Let different approaches compete, then choose the winner! Options
1. 2. 3. use use in use at a (in my personal order of preference): adaptive primary mirror segments (Riccardi et Al. 2003) "adaptive secondary technology" with higher actuator density somewhere else the telescope (with segmentation scaled from primary segmentation) segmented, buttable, Piezo or MEM correctors on piezo tripods (piston-tip-tilt) re-imaged pupil (with segmentation scaled from primary segmentation)

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

21


Opinions on WFS, detectors, computers Piston sensitive WaveFrontSensors:
· there are many good ideas and approaches for split pupils · there are quantitative laboratory measurement in one case ( Esposito et Al. 2003, on Pyramid sensor) · there are enough photons Not anymore a problem

Computing power
· segmented correctors can use hierarchical algorithms · computational needs ca also be reduced in other ways · if necessary, optical computing is becoming reality! (an optical DSP doing 8 Tera Multiply+Add Operations/s soon on the market by a company from Israel)

Fast, large detectors
A 512x512 LLLCCD (E2V ccd 87, 11 Mpix/s) is on the market only needs multiple (24) readout amplifiers (known technology)

It will not remain a problem for a long time!
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 22


Opinions on telescope and site
A: Telescope · We better avoid using because a smaller, well larger one. · A telescope optimized (the corrected field can

a large but not optimized telescope for detection optimized and well located, telescope can outperform the for extrasolar planets can do everything else optimally be increased with the addition of extra post-focus conjugates)

B: Site · We need to understand whether Antarctica really is what somebody says: something intermediate between ground and space (Storey et Al. 2002) · If it is, that is the place to go to! (even with a small 30 m telescope)

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

23


Conclusion

Let's start discussing what we want to learn about extrasolar planets,

earths in particular
they seem to be well within reach of ELT
Marseille ELT science meeting P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 24


Correspondence of file names with references
To make consultation easier I will place the following files (cited in the slides) at the address:

www.arcetri.astro.it/~salinari/ELT
Angel_2002.pdf: R. Angel, "Imaging exoplanets from the ground", ASP Conference Series, Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, eds. S. Seager and D. Deming, Washington D.C. 2002. Jolissaint_Veran_2001.pdf: L. Jolissaint and J.Veran, "Fast computation and morfologic interpretation of the Adaptive Optics Point Spread Function", Venice 2001 Conf. Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, Esposito_et_Al_2003: S. Esposito, E. Pinna, A. Tozzi, P. Stefanini, N. Devaney, "Co-phasing of segmented mirrors using pyramid sensors" SPIE Proceedings, S Diego. Hawarden_et_Al_2002.pdf: T. G. Hawarden, D.Dravins, G.F.Gilmore, R.Gilmozzi, O.Hainaut, K. Kuijken, B.Leibundgut, M.R.Merrifield, D.Queloz & R.F.G.Wyse, "Critical science with the largest telescopes: science drivers for a100m ground-based optical-IR telescope", Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4840 Lardiere_et_Al_2003.pdf: O. Lardiere, P. Salinari, L. Jolissaint, M. Carbillet, A. Riccardi, S. Esposito,; "Adaptive optics and site requirements for search of earth-like planets with ELTs " (Proc. of II Backaskog conference on ELTs) Riaud_et_Al_2001.ps: P. Riaud, A. Boccaletti, D. Rouan, F. Lemarquis, A. Labeyrie, "The four-quadrant phase-mask coronagraph. II, Simulations", PASP 113:1145-1154, 2001 September. Riccardi_et_Al_2003.pdf: A. Riccardi, C. Del Vecchio, P. Salinari, G. Brusa, O. Lardiere, D. Gallieni, R. Biasi, P. Mantegazza, "Primary adaptive mirrors for ELTs: a report on preliminary studies" (Proc. of II Backaskog conference on ELTs) Storey_et_Al_2002.pdf: J. Storey, M. Burton, M. Ashley, "Antartica as stepping stone to space", http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~mgb/Antbib/stepping-stone.pdf Verinaud_Esposito_2002: C. Verinaud and S. Esposito, ``Adaptive optics correction of a stellar interferometer with single pyramid wavefront sensor,'' Opt. Letters , 2002. Yaitskova_et_Al_2002.pdf: N. Yaitskova, K. Dohlenb, P. Dierickx, "Diffraction in OWL: effects of segmentation and segment edge misfigure", Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4840

Marseille ELT science meeting

P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets

25


Useful scaling rules and relations (Lardiere et Al. 2003)
Symbols and definitions Fried's coherence length Coherence time Turbulence weighted wind speed Telescope diameter Actuator separation Field angle Contrast due to RWE
C ( ) =

r0 0 v0 D C()

Scaling rules: = /W C() D-2 (at given , S~1) C() (/ r0)2 (if not limited by Qph) Q
ph


n

PSF ( ) PSF




n

(r0)3/v0

(sums on planet pixels) Contrast with coronagraph Strehl ratio Integration time Photon flux usable by wfs
Marseille ELT science meeting

Co() S T Qph
P. Salinari: Detection of extrasolar planets 26