CLOSURE OF THE ARCSAT DUE TO HAZARDOUS
OBSERVING CONDITIONS
These policies are consulted whenever there are questions or concerns
for closing the enclosure due to hazardous
conditions or situations.
Summary:
-
telescope operations will be suspended whenever conditions pose
a risk to facilities or personnel;
-
the Chief Telescope Engineer has full responsibility and
sole authority to make this decision. This may include making
subjective assessments of the degree of risk;
-
attempts to change the decision of the Chief Telescope Engineering are a violation of the Observatory safety rules and will not be
tolerated; and,
-
observatory management will discuss related policy concerns or
suggestions at an appropriate time, but will not consider appeals nor
intervene in specific decisions of the Chief Telescope Engineer.
Policy: Operation of ARCSAT shall be suspended whenever, in the
opinion of the Chief Telescope Engineer, weather, atmospheric conditions, signs
of imminent mechanical malfunction, or any other situation exists which
poses a risk to either the facility or on-site personnel.
This policy will
be enforced conservatively, i.e., even though it may be probable that
operations could be continued safely, the telescope will be closed unless
the risk is considered negligibly small by the Chief Telescope Engineer.
Rationale: The long-term scientific return from ARCSAT and associated
facilities requires avoiding equipment damage in the pursuit of short-term
scientific goals. Also, the need to provide a safe working environment is
self-evident. Differencse of opinion on telescope closure usually results from
situations in which the danger seems relatively small. However, our
operational procedures must consider the long-term accumulated risk and
be appropriately conservative.
Policy: The Chief Telescope Engineer has full responsibility and
sole authority to suspend operations for the reasons described in the
previous policy.
In some instances, measurable quantities (e.g., wind
speed) and preset limits will guide such decisions (these quantitative
closure limits are listed on the APO Weather Status web pages). In many
circumstances, an informed but somewhat subjective judgement will be
necessary. Regardless of their position within ARC, academic rank, or
other qualifications, those scheduled to use the telescope are unable to overrule
the Chief Telescope Engineer or "assume responsibility" for such
decisions themselves.
Rationale: Our policy is consistent with practices at other major
observatories, which recognize and protect against the possibility of
conflicts of interest.
Policy: Users of ARCSAT must not attempt to influence the Chief Telescope Engineer to continue telescope operations which are or might be
suspended due to safety concerns.
This prohibition is to be interpreted
very broadly; polite expression of differing opinion, angry argument,
extended musings on the unfortunate consequences of the lost observing
time, continued expression of disappointment, frequent requests to check
for possibly improved conditions and so
forth are all included in this ban.
Rationale: It is hazardous to have the decisions of the Chief Telescope Engineer influenced in the direction of taking greater risks in marginal
situations; the variations in people's personalities, levels of self
confidence and so forth are such that this might happen in some cases.
For changes or edits, contact:
Project Director: Suzanne Hawley (slh/astro.washington.edu)
Chief Telescope Engineer: Bill Ketzeback (bketzeba/apo.nmsu.edu)
for questions or comments contact archive
server |