Mercury,
September/October 2006 Table of Contents
by
James C. White II
This,
like other recent ones, was a mild winter in Iceland.
The
ground was fluid—a white liquid rushing past my booted feet,
and after only a minute out of the vehicle, I could feel the wind's
continual push making its way though my layers of Gore-Tex and down
and polar fleece. I chanced a look up at the azure sky, the Sun
perpetually low there this time of the year, and told myself, "Just
think what a harsh winter is like."
Iceland
in February is not everyone’s idea of a travel destination,
yet a few years ago, my group of forty had come here to see glaciers
and geysers and the northern lights. I was a co-leader of an Icelandic
adventure trip—my first time in that small, beautiful country—and
I took this opportunity also to see the effects of increased global
temperatures. Real effects, too: on this particular day, we were
nestled in a valley at the confluence of two glaciers, and where
the snow only years ago would have been ten meters deep, the snow
that winter was at most a meter.
Science
magazines and journals have dedicated over the past several years
greater coverage to the topics of polar science and global change.
Naturally, one of the most interesting and alarming stories is the
influence of upwardly creeping temperatures on the Arctic and Antarctic
regions—not just because of the effects on the far south's
Empire penguins or the far north's polar bears, but also the impact
on humanity as ocean and sea levels rise. Own a home on Cape Cod?
Enjoy camping on Cape Hatteras? Expect those waves to be lapping
a bit higher each year. Want to sail the Northwest Passage? Scientific
predictions imply you should wait about a decade for it to open
completely in northern summer.
If
you enjoyed this excerpt from a feature article and would
like to receive our bi-monthly Mercury magazine, we invite you to
join the ASP and receive
6 issues a year.
|