Mercury,
January/February 2003 Table of Contents
|
Type
Ia Supernova 1998bu. Courtesy of Nicholas Suntzeff (NOAO),
et al. |
by
Jennifer Birriel
Astronomers
have pinned their conclusion of an accelerating universe on observations
of Type Ia supernovae. But truth be told, they don't even know for
sure what causes these explosions.
In
1929, Edwin Hubble stunned the world with the announcement that
galaxies are rushing away from one another, which implies that our
universe is expanding. This news came much to the chagrin of Albert
Einstein, whose general relativity equations predicted cosmic expansion.
Einstein had firmly believed that the universe was static and had
even added a fudge factor, dubbed the cosmological constant, to
make his equations yield a static universe. After Hubble's announcement,
Einstein publicly declared the cosmological constant to be the "greatest
blunder" of his scientific career.
The
cosmological constant fell into and out of favor over the next several
decades, revived on occasion to solve some cosmological conundrum,
only to fall into disfavor again. Ultimately, astronomers expected
that gravity would slow the expansion of the universe.
But
in 1998, the cosmological constant gained a new, almost celebrity
status. Two groups of astronomers -- the High-Z Supernova Search
Team led by Brian Schmidt and the Supernova Cosmology Project led
by Saul Perlmutter -- presented strong evidence that our universe
is expanding at an ever-increasing rate. The two teams based their
accelerating universe conclusion on observations of distant Type
Ia supernovae. These recent results represent the first convincing
evidence for the existence of the infamous cosmological constant
-- a cosmic "anti-gravity" that will ultimately drive
apart all the galaxies in the universe to infinite distances apart
at speeds greater than the speed of light. So far, cosmic acceleration
has withstood the critical scrutiny of the astrophysical community.
|