Mercury,
July/August 2004 Table of Contents
by
Yaël Nazé
It
all began like any ordinary day. But suddenly, the sky changed with
the appearance of a new star. Men and women raised their heads,
shaking with fear. The sky should not change, they cried—this
must be a sign of the gods! We are doomed: this guest in our sky
can only bring plague and disaster.
This
is probably how our ancestors felt on a clear day in year 1054 of
the Common Era. Today's astronomers would probably do anything to
witness such an event: a bright new star visible in daylight. Of
course we now know that stars evolve and that the most massive of
them die in incredible explosions of light called supernovae. We
have seen such things in several places of the Universe, even one
in 1987 as relatively nearby as the Large Magellanic Cloud, but
never one so close as that of 1054. And because we can not travel
back through time, we are left to concentrate on accounts by Middle
Age skywatchers of that bright, 11th-century supernova.
The "1054 fever" began in 1928, when Edwin Hubble had
yet another brilliant idea. Using the expansion velocity of Messier
1, the Crab Nebula, he deduced that it was born 900 years ago. This
approximate birthdate corresponded well with the appearance of a
"guest star" reported by the Chinese in 1054. Nowadays,
we possess several texts describing the appearance of the same supernova,
but do they all agree? And when exactly did the supernova explode?
If
you enjoyed this excerpt from a feature article and would
like to receive our bi-monthly Mercury magazine, we invite you to
join the ASP and receive
6 issues a year.
|
|