Mercury,
March/April 1998 Table of Contents
(c) 1998 Astronomical
Society of the Pacific
Out
of the silence came a swoosh from just above my head. It was night,
and it took me a moment to figure out that the noise belonged to
a local owl. Large wings lifted it higher until it finally landed
and perched on a lightpole 50 meters away.
"Anyone
want to see an owl?" I yelled back to my students, milling around
outside the campus observatory. They flowed from the darkness toward
me, binoculars around their necks, skycharts and observing sheets
clutched to their chests. "Hey, I see it! It's in Cepheus!"
To
be so far away, to be so seemingly alien and unconcerned about us,
the heavens touch us intimately and sometimes even appear to frame
our existence and experiences. I grew up on a farm in the country
("Yep. Just turn off the main road, and..."), far from city lights
and intimate with that chilly otherness above me. The stars and
planets and constellations were things I recognized early, faces
of relatives you should know because they are, well, related. But
it wasn't until I aged that I really began to know some of them.
Along
the way I also came to know other people who knew them. A few became
friends and many acquaintances, all of us part of our astronomy
community. Constituting an "imagined community," appropriated from
political scientist Benedict Anderson's description of nationalism,
astronomers are linked by their fascination with things extraterrestrial,
by the nexus of the inclusive language of science (astrospeak dialect,
of course), and by that feeling of familiarity with the unfamiliar
above.
Yet
while we work away in observatory warmrooms or the cool darkness
of our offices, we can, intentionally or not, isolate ourselves
from those outside. I don't claim these ideas as my own; they are
well-known to scientists. We all need reminding, however, that what
astronomers do is of great interest to the larger community. And
Mercury, as I see it, is a wonderful vehicle to educate, to enlighten,
and to challenge all its readers-the educators, the amateur and
professional astronomers, the interested non-astronomers.
For
the past three and a half years George Musser steered Mercury through
the thickets and sometimes overgrowth of contemporary astronomy.
The magazine increased in size and broadened its scope to include
topics occasionally that some might consider peripheral, or more
directly, "on the edge." This is well and good, and I would not
have accepted the position as Mercury editor were it not so. But
Mercury's foundation will always be astronomy's endeavors and discoveries,
related in astronomers' voices.
My
students left me that night and returned to their work on star colors.
Their sounds fell away as I thought of the voices of the writers
in this Mercury. The personalities who seek to unravel creation,
to understand the way our universe is cobbled together. The people
among us who dedicate themselves to finding out the why of the universe
for all of us. Yet those murmurings faded, too. In the hoot-hoot
call of that owl sitting high in the stars of Cepheus.
|
|