4.
Undergraduate Education
In
this section, I want to discuss educating non-science majors as
part of some general education program, and not the undergraduate
education of scientists. As we saw, there has been a tremendous
increase in the number of people getting college degrees in recent
decades, something few us who took going to college for granted
really appreciate enough.
Before
World War II, only 8% of Americans went to college; today more than
half will get a bit of college education, and about a third actually
graduate from college. In 1950, about 500,000 college degrees were
awarded in the country (432,000 bachelors, 58,000 masters, 6,000
PhD's). By 1995, 1.7 million degrees were awarded, among them almost
1.2 million bachelors, 75,000 medical legal and other professional
degrees, 377,000 masters, 41,000 PhD's. [U.S. Dept of Education:
Digest of Education Statistics, 1996.]
There
are some 2,200 four-year colleges and universities in the U.S.,
plus about 1,500 two-year colleges (but some of these are technical
training schools, so that the number of two-year colleges as we
would think of them may be closer to 1200.) In 1997, according to
the U.S. Dept of Education, about 15 million students were enrolled
in some institution of higher education, from community college
to research university. And we keep learning beyond our younger
years: In 1994-95, out of a total US adult population of 190 million,
the U.S. National Center for Educational Statistics reported that
76 million had taken some sort of adult education or training course
in the last 12 months. (That's an impressive figure: almost 40%
of the population!)
No
one quite knows how many students take an introductory astronomy
course each year. I surveyed textbook authors and publishers who
keep track of this sort of statistics and the best estimate I can
come up with is that roughly 200,000 students take astronomy in
the U.S. per year. (The one hard figure I could get in this area
was from the American Institute of Physics. So far, they only survey
degree granting physics and astronomy institutions, and those reported
in 1994-95 a combined introductory astronomy enrollment of about
155,000. Given that many smaller introductory courses are taught
at places where physics and astronomy degrees are not granted --
such as many community colleges, evening adult schools, etc., this
figure is in accord with the publishers' estimates.)
And
how good are the introductory survey courses we teach? How well
do they convey the excitement and the methods of science to undergraduates?
Are the techniques and tools we use to teach them appropriate to
the kinds of students who are taking these classes? As a new textbook
author, I have spent the last two years thinking about these issues
and worry that we often teach our non-science majors astronomy as
if they were just like our science majors but without the good sense
to have made a wise career choice. This leaves many of them feeling
alienated from science and less supportive of the scientific enterprise
than they might otherwise have been.
In
fact, the reasoning ability, learning styles, and science and math
preparations of our general education students may now be radically
different from the students of even just a few decades ago and certainly
from those students who choose to major in astronomy or physics.
Let me just mention a brief sobering thought about the situation
in California. We have three levels of higher education in our state:
the elite University of California at the top and the extensive
system of over 100 community colleges at the bottom. In between
is the California State University System (with 22 campuses and
320,000 students), where students are supposed to have about a B
average in high school to get in. In 1994, all entering freshmen
at California State Universities were given assessment tests: 49%
were not ready in their skills for college-level English and 54%
were not able to perform even basic college-level math. I taught
introductory astronomy on one of these campuses for over 10 years
and the challenges involved in reaching some of these students effectively
in a science class are indeed considerable.
A
large fraction of the introductory courses in astronomy are taught
at community colleges and other institutions where research is not
required or expected of faculty. With the help of NASA's IDEA grant
program and the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, I have begun
a systematic survey of these instructors.
It is interesting to note that (judging from the first 300 respondents)
only 20% of these instructors have an astronomy degree, most do
not consider themselves primarily astronomers, most teach one or
more other subjects, and most rarely come to meetings of astronomers.
Many have teaching loads of 15 units, or five 3-unit classes each
and every semester, with small or non-existent budgets, and little
opportunity for professional growth. These institutions represent
the quiet backwater of astronomy and the instructors of these courses
often feel and are left out of the mainstream discussions about
astronomy and astronomy education.
The
Astronomical Society of the Pacific has begun a series of discussions
and symposia at its summer meetings focusing on the teaching of
astronomy at non-research-oriented institutions and we invite anyone
with an interest in this topic to contact us for more information
on how to get involved.
table
of contents
|
|