printer-friendly
version
by
Andrew Fraknoi
(Foothill College & Astronomical Society of the Pacific)
Version 5.0; October 2009
© copyright
2009 Andrew Fraknoi. The right to reproduce for any educational
non-commercial purpose is hereby granted, as long as the author's
name and institution are not deleted. For any other use, contact
the author at e-mail: fraknoiandrew {at} fhda.edu
This
is a selected list of resources for those who want to examine with
a skeptical eye some of the claims at the fringes of science that
seem connected to astronomy. The last section includes some general
books that deal with a broader range of pseudo-scientific topics.
Educators can sometimes use the enormous media and student interest
in some of these topics as a way of generating discussion about
what constitutes science and what does not. It's an opportunity
to explain how the scientific method allows us to test controversial
hypotheses and determine whether nature really works in the way
they claim. The claims listed here generally evaporate under the
scrutiny of careful observation and experiment.
Table
of Contents:
1.
Astrology
2. UFO's as Alien Spaceships
3. Crop Circles
4. The "Face" on Mars
5. The Full Moon and Lunacy
6. The Dogon Tribe and Sirius B
7. Immanuel Velikovsky and Worlds
in Collision
8. Ancient Astronauts and Erich Von
Daniken
9. Astronomical Aspects of Creationism
and Intelligent Design
10. The "Great Moon Hoax":
Did Astronauts Land on the Moon?
11. Doomsday 2012 and the Planet Nibiru
12. Miscellaneous Topics in Astronomical
Pseudo-science
13. General Books and Sites that Include
Sections on These Topics
1.
Astrology
Perhaps
the best known field of astronomical pseudo-science is the ancient
idea that the position of the Sun, Moon, and planets at the moment
we are born somehow affects our subsequent personality, career,
or love-life. Astrology got a big media boost in 1988 when it was
revealed that for a large part of his term, President's Reagan's
schedule had been controlled by the predictions of a San Francisco
astrologer (who had been on Nancy Reagan's payroll.) However, astrology
is also the field in which the largest number of scientific tests
have been performed and the evidence clearly demonstrates that astrological
connections are no more than wishful thinking.
Culver,
Roger & Ianna, Philip Astrology: True or False. 1988,
Prometheus Books. The best skeptical book about astrology, full
of useful information.
Fraknoi,
A. "Your Astrology Defense Kit" in Sky & Telescope,
Aug. 1989, p. 146. An introductory article with some basic skeptical
questions about astrology. (Available on the web at:
http://www.astrosociety.org/education/astro/act3/
astrology3.html#defense)
Astrology
and Science Web Site: Ivan Kelly and others keep some of the best
articles and research studies on this crowded site.
http://www.astrology-and-science.com
The
Astrotest: Dutch skeptic Rob Nanninga describes an experimental
test of astrology done with the help of astrologers.
http://www.skepsis.nl/astrot.html
The
Real Romance in the Stars: Biologist Richard Dawkins wrote an angry
column to a British newspaper flirting with astrology and you can
see it here with a few later notes.
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/the-real-romance-in-the-stars-1527970.html
Carlson,
S. "Astrology" in Experientia, vol. 44, p. 290
(1988). A clear review.
Carlson,
S. "A Double Blind Test of Astrology" in Nature,
vol. 318, p. 419 (5 Dec. 1985). A technical paper describing a good
experiment examining whether astrology works.
Dean,
G. "Does Astrology Need to be True?" in Skeptical Inquirer,
Winter 86-87, p. 116; Spring 1987, p. 257. An important examination
of tests about astrology.
Dean,
G. & Kelly, I. "Does Astrology Work: Astrology and Skepticism
1975-2000" in Kurtz, Paul, ed. Skeptical Odysseys. 2001,
Prometheus Books.
Kelly,
I. "Modern Astrology: A Critique" in Psychological
Reports, vol. 81, p. 1035 (1997). An excellent review. (An expanded
version can be found on the first web site recommended below.)
Kelly,
I." Why Astrology Doesn't Work" in Psychological Reports,
vol. 82, p. 527 (1998).
Kurtz,
P. & Fraknoi, A. "Scientific Tests of Astrology Do Not
Support Its Claims" in Skeptical Inquirer, Spring 1985,
p. 210.
Kurtz,
P., et al. "Astrology and the Presidency" in Skeptical
Inquirer, Fall 1988, p. 3. A good summary of the controversy
concerning astrology in the Reagan White House.
Lovi,
G. "Zodiacal Signs Versus Constellations" in Sky &
Telescope, Nov. 1987, p.507.
table
of contents
|