Hey, no worries!

To be is to be DIFFERENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If "B" were not different in at least some way from "A"; why, "B" would even have the same name as "A"; it would have to be "A".

To exist is to BE DIFFERENT: to BE!

Say "B" exists; and "A" exists. They are separate!
Thank goodness! "B" is a way of looking at itself and the world (inculding "A").
"A" is a way of looking at itself and the world (including "B").

If "A" looks honestly (in the name of "Existence"); and "B" looks honestly (in the name of "Existence"): you (honestly) have consciousness between them (a way of looking at a way of looking). You have a way of looking at a way of looking; through Existence.

"A" and "B" are separate consciousnessnes; yet they are aware through one pool of mutual consciousness. Jesus said if I recall, to his Heavenly Father: "May they be one as you and I are one".

One in shared consciousness?

"When two or more are gathered in My Name, there am I in the midst of them", Jesus said.

This seems to me to mean that when two or more are gathered in the name of honesty (God = Existence; so in honesty is in His name); there is He (Existence, Love, Consciousness(?)) in the midst of them?

As a newborn baby my twin and I knew directly what each other was thinking. Our thoughts referenced reality DIRECTLY (word-language labelling not needed). Roger Penrose also acknowledges that thought is more basic than language (you can have in a flash enough thought that would take pages of writing to spell out. Something far more efficient than word-language is what one relatively clumsily tries to put in word-language).

Eternal Life is the idea. LIFE: not static: alive!

-dolphin