Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.astronomy.net/forums/exploration/messages/53.shtml
Дата изменения: Unknown
Дата индексирования: Sun Apr 10 02:04:15 2016
Кодировка:

Поисковые слова: п п п п п п п п п п п п п
On An Atomic Level, That Is To Say, 'granular Level' ... - an Astronomy Net Exploration Forum Message
Back to Home

Astronomy Discussion Forums

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums
Login

On An Atomic Level, That Is To Say, 'granular Level' ...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on October 16, 2002 16:36:53 UTC

Greetings
Thanks, Aurino, for that reply.

If our systems of equations in physics are _not made necessary by a specific "shape of things" that is one case.
If there _is an individual character to our universe that makes some internally consistent
physics systems workable and others not, that is a second case.
I am predisposed to believe in the second, though
belief might not be necessary or pertinent to the actual state of affairs. I might change my beliefs, but I would be interested in actually finding out which one is truer.

Now, my question is whether Dr. Stafford's paper
supports the first or second case, or both.

Mike

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2016 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins