On An Atomic Level, That Is To Say, 'granular Level' ... - an Astronomy Net Exploration Forum Message

Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.net/forums/exploration/messages/53.shtml
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 02:04:15 2016
Êîäèðîâêà:
Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï ï

Astronomy Discussion Forums
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums	Login

On An Atomic Level, That Is To Say, 'granular Level' ...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on October 16, 2002 16:36:53 UTC

Greetings
Thanks, Aurino, for that reply.

If our systems of equations in physics are _not made necessary by a specific "shape of things" that is one case.
If there _is an individual character to our universe that makes some internally consistent
physics systems workable and others not, that is a second case.
I am predisposed to believe in the second, though
belief might not be necessary or pertinent to the actual state of affairs. I might change my beliefs, but I would be interested in actually finding out which one is truer.

Now, my question is whether Dr. Stafford's paper
supports the first or second case, or both.

Mike

Follow Ups:

The first, I think - aurino1 - October 16, 2002 - 17:30 UTC
- I think what you're saying is not a deeply-considered position - quiet - October 16, 2002 - 19:36 UTC
  - Anyone is out; Someone Else is in - aurino1 - October 16, 2002 - 20:33 UTC
    - I didn't want you to 'walk the plank' ... - quiet - October 17, 2002 - 07:34 UTC
      - For the record - aurino1 - October 17, 2002 - 13:03 UTC
        
        for the record...."vague denials and buck-passing?" - carefuluniverse - October 17, 2002 - 16:06 UTC
        
        your post, translated - aurino1 - October 17, 2002 - 16:53 UTC
        
        If that isn't Troll spam, I don't know what spam is! - doctordick - October 17, 2002 - 16:59 UTC
        
        I'm sorry - aurino1 - October 17, 2002 - 18:26 UTC
        
        I feel we are in close company ! - carefuluniverse - October 17, 2002 - 20:27 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2016 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins