Consequences - an Astronomy Net Blackholes2 Forum Message

Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.net/forums/blackholes2/messages/4917.shtml
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 02:34:17 2016
Êîäèðîâêà:

Blackholes2 Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes II \| Post	Login

Consequences

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Gary Conner on May 6, 2004 07:34:54 UTC

thanks for the reply. clearly you are well versed. let me gripe about dark matter. the observable mass of our own galaxy, and virtually all others, is not nearly enough to explain galactic rotation. that is disturbing. ordinary 'clumps' of atomic hydrogen gravitationally collapses into stars, which have observable consequences. why are there not dark matter equivalents that are observable?

Follow Ups:

Cahill claims that the missing... - wandaqueen - May 6, 2004 - 16:31 UTC
- missing mass - krill - May 8, 2004 - 08:52 UTC
  - whatever.............. - dolphin - May 8, 2004 - 10:31 UTC
    - Regarding Bunk - dolphin - May 8, 2004 - 10:53 UTC
    - dark matter - krill - May 10, 2004 - 08:29 UTC
      - cool ideas krill - dolphin - May 20, 2004 - 04:37 UTC
  - Cahill Links - wandaqueen - May 8, 2004 - 12:43 UTC
    - brilliant! thanks - dolphin - May 24, 2004 - 09:41 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2016 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins