So True - an Astronomy Net Blackholes Forum Message

Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.net/forums/blackholes/messages/6580.shtml
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 02:09:48 2016
Êîäèðîâêà:
Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: redshift survey

Blackholes Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes I \| Post	Login

So True

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Duane Eddy on January 27, 2005 23:10:38 UTC

And if we assume that gravity and mass are wave forms then the density increase at the center of a black hole can not condense further then one wave length.
So there must be a maximum density.

Would you agree?

Duane

Follow Ups:

It is still unknown - wandaqueen - January 28, 2005 - 02:57 UTC
- Beginner quantum - duordi - January 29, 2005 - 15:38 UTC
  - Re: Begginner quantum - wandaqueen - January 30, 2005 - 00:56 UTC
    - Oh? - duordi - January 30, 2005 - 03:25 UTC
      - Statments I disagree with - wandaqueen - February 1, 2005 - 13:13 UTC
        
        Rest mass - duordi - February 8, 2005 - 15:31 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2016 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins