Plight Of The Massless Teddybear - an Astronomy Net Bigbang Forum Message

Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.net/forums/bigbang/messages/908.shtml
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 01:38:09 2016
Êîäèðîâêà:
Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: cygnus

Bigbang Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Big Bang \| Post	Login

Plight Of The Massless Teddybear

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by zarker99 on October 17, 2010 02:23:56 UTC

So, the theory goes:

The more distant the observed object, the greater its redshift, and the older it is.

If I had a sensitive enough observing device - I seem to be being told here - I could see right back to the big-bang, and prove it's the big bang by a sufficiantly shifted spectrum.

OK

I have a fabourite teddy bear. If I'm diligent and patient enough I could maybe observe the very atoms of my teddy bear at the moment of their creation in the big bang.

The problem is - those atoms which are destined to one day make up my teddy bear, appear to be rushing away from it at incredible speeds.

Does my teddy bear really exist?

Is there a way to bring together my teddy bear and its embryonic material, and so give it its mass back?

Follow Ups:

Solution - zarker99 - October 20, 2010 - 10:57 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2016 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins