The Ekpyrotic [string] Models And The Standard Guth Model. - an Astronomy Net Bigbang Forum Message

Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.net/forums/bigbang/messages/859.shtml
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 01:34:09 2016
Êîäèðîâêà:
Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: ð ï ð ï ð ï ð ï ð ï ð ï ð ï ð ï ð ï ð ï ð ï ð ï

Bigbang Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Big Bang \| Post	Login

The Ekpyrotic [string] Models And The Standard Guth Model.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Rowanda on November 22, 2005 14:30:24 UTC

Bruce,

Could you outline the differences between the Ekpyrotic [string] models and the standard Guth model? Is it really possible to verify string theory this way?

wanda

Follow Ups:

Colliding branes. - bruce - November 23, 2005 - 00:55 UTC
- Branes do not need to collide - wandaqueen - November 23, 2005 - 13:29 UTC
  - Steinhardts. theories - wandaqueen - November 23, 2005 - 17:51 UTC
  - That's interesting... - bruce - November 23, 2005 - 21:35 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2016 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins