You Should Mention The Numbers - an Astronomy Net Bigbang Forum Message

Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.net/forums/bigbang/messages/845.shtml
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 01:32:45 2016
Êîäèðîâêà:

Bigbang Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Big Bang \| Post	Login

You Should Mention The Numbers

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Rowanda on November 11, 2005 10:34:17 UTC

Three sets of 6 dimensional compactifications plus two 4 dimensional spacetimes equals 18 + 8 = 26. I concur with the numbers, but the physics is beyond my understanding. It seems that the key issue is if in 10 dimensional superstring theory where 6 dimensions compactify to create fermions in 3 dimensional space, is there room or possibility of another 6 dimensional compactification. Otherwise the numbers do not work

Wanda

Follow Ups:

Agreed - yanniru - November 12, 2005 - 11:27 UTC
- Google inflation.compactification - wandaqueen - November 14, 2005 - 13:29 UTC
  - More recent work on stringy inflation - yanniru - November 14, 2005 - 14:18 UTC
    - The two time dimensions are the key - wandaqueen - November 18, 2005 - 13:14 UTC
      - Two spacetimes cosmology - yanniru - November 20, 2005 - 20:59 UTC
        
        How to cancel an infinity - yanniru - November 20, 2005 - 23:49 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2016 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins