Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.com/magazine/tony-hallas/2013/03/the-right-number-of-images
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 12:03:37 2016
Êîäèðîâêà: ISO8859-5

Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: ñ ð ð ð ð ð ð ðåð ð ð ð ð ð ñ
The right number of images | Astronomy.com
Tonight's Sky
Sun
ò??
ò??
Sun
Moon
ò??
ò??
Moon
ò??
ò??
Mercury
ò??
ò??
Mercury
ò??
Venus
ò??
ò??
Venus
ò??
Mars
ò??
ò??
Mars
ò??
Jupiter
ò??
ò??
Jupiter
ò??
Saturn
ò??
ò??
Saturn
ò??

Tonight's Sky ò?? Change location

OR

Searching...

Tonight's Sky ò?? Select location

Tonight's Sky ò?? Enter coordinates

ÒÀ '
ÒÀ '

The right number of images

May 2013: Let statistics work to the benefit of your pictures.
RELATED TOPICS: ASTROIMAGING
tony_hallas
Most astroimagers know that if you take lots of frames and combine them, you get better results. The classic formula states that the gain in signal-to-noise ratio is equal to the square root of the number of frames combined.

But I have found that this is too simplistic. A lot of the time, we didnò??t have the best sky to work with or we misjudged exposure times. I used to think that a combination of the longest exposures and the most frames would give the best results. And in a perfect world, that would be true.

Astronomy magazine subscribers can read the full column for free. Just make sure you're registered with the website.

Already a subscriber? Register now!

Registration is FREE and takes only a few seconds to complete. If you are already registered on Astronomy.com, please log in below.
ADVERTISEMENT

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Receive news, sky-event information, observing tips, and more from Astronomy's weekly email newsletter.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
asy_gravitational_eguide

Click here to receive a FREE e-Guide exclusively from Astronomy magazine.

Find us on Facebook