Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.com/magazine/adam-block/2015/02/when-rejection-is-good-part-1
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 12:10:51 2016
Êîäèðîâêà: ISO8859-5
When rejection is good, part 1 | Astronomy.com
Tonight's Sky
Sun
ò??
ò??
Sun
Moon
ò??
ò??
Moon
ò??
ò??
Mercury
ò??
ò??
Mercury
ò??
Venus
ò??
ò??
Venus
ò??
Mars
ò??
ò??
Mars
ò??
Jupiter
ò??
ò??
Jupiter
ò??
Saturn
ò??
ò??
Saturn
ò??

Tonight's Sky ò?? Change location

OR

Searching...

Tonight's Sky ò?? Select location

Tonight's Sky ò?? Enter coordinates

ÒÀ '
ÒÀ '

When rejection is good, part 1

Adam Block shows how you can improve your images by rejecting spurious values, such as those from cosmic-ray strikes.
RELATED TOPICS: ASTROIMAGING
AdamBlock_2013
The genesis for this column comes from my experience with image processing. When I began digital photography in the early 1990s, most amateurs would take pictures totaling a few minutes of exposure and add them together. These grayscale images far exceeded what could be accomplished with film in the same period of time.

More experienced imagers combined RGB-filtered images. However, the exposure times and number of frames collected remained small. Interestingly, imagers often would buy larger instruments and more sensitive cameras before increasing the exposure duration and number.

Astronomy magazine subscribers can read the full column for free. Just make sure you're registered with the website.

Already a subscriber? Register now!

Registration is FREE and takes only a few seconds to complete. If you are already registered on Astronomy.com, please log in below.
ADVERTISEMENT

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Receive news, sky-event information, observing tips, and more from Astronomy's weekly email newsletter.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
asy_gravitational_eguide

Click here to receive a FREE e-Guide exclusively from Astronomy magazine.

Find us on Facebook