).
So we had to limit the allowable jitter offset for the current implementation.
|
Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес
оригинального документа
: http://www.adass.org/adass/proceedings/adass99/P3-34/
Дата изменения: Sat Oct 7 00:40:14 2000 Дата индексирования: Tue Oct 2 06:43:56 2012 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п р п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п п |
Today the HST archive contains more than 70,000 WFPC2 exposures. We are preparing an automatic pipeline that will extract several parameters from those images. A list of all the sources seen by WFPC2, along with photometrical, morphological and astrometric measurements of both the detected astronomical sources and of the background will be extracted.
Astronomers will make use of such a database to query the archive in a more sophisticated and scientific manner, that is in the way they think, not in the way the archive is built.
This new approach will allow queries of the kind: search for high latitude fields having a certain limiting magnitude and where the density of extended sources is greater than a certain threshold.
Nowadays, with the advent of huge detectors over big fields of view, such an approach becomes a must. The catalogue of extracted objects will be immediately useful to prepare a wide range of scientific programs for the 8 - 10 meter class telescopes, e.g., multi-object spectroscopy of HST sources.
Every time a scientist, looking for information on some astronomical field of interest, tries to access a science data archive, s/he has to deal with the intrinsic structure of the archive itself.
Modern astronomical archives are trying to hide all the technicalities to the astronomer, but yet, usually, only a catalogue of observations can be queried. Such a catalogue is a mere collection of pointings, with some associated information, like, e.g., coordinates, exposure time, filter, principal investigator, instrument mode.
Only rarely some more useful information is added to the catalogue; for example in the IUE case a classification field is available. Through such a field the scientist can query the archive for all objects of a certain type.
This approach is valid if the archive was to serve only the primary targets; it is certainly not prone to be a discovery tool.
As a consequence while an archive could contain very interesting and unexploited data, scientists are offered with very limited means of finding them.
The WFPC2 associations were introduced in the HST archive at the beginning of 1998. Since then, astronomers can retrieve from the ST-ECF and CADC archives WFPC2 on-the-fly re-calibrated (Crabtree et al. 1996) co-added images which have already been cleaned of cosmic rays.
The offsets used to co-add the images from an associations
are computed from the jitter files (Micol, Pirenne & Bristow
1997, 1998).
Unfortunately not all the
HST observations have associated jitter files, mainly because of telemetry
problem. Therefore many WFPC2 frames (55%!)
cannot be grouped into an association.
In early 1999, the development of a new association pipeline was started. Standard cross-correlation techniques were used to measure the offsets among WFPC2 observations belonging to the same proposal and using the same filter.
Comparison of the cross-correlation offsets with the jitter offsets,
along with manual inspection of the WFPC2 frames,
showed an unexpected first result: the jitter pointing information
is affected by a drift in its zero-point. The effect could be as high
as 0.2 WF pixels during 3 HST orbits (
).
So we had to limit the allowable jitter offset for the current implementation.
 
|
 |
The cross-correlation method works well for observations showing enough features to correlate with. Basically this happens for the redder filters. When the cross-correlation fails (i.e., there is no agreement among the offsets computed with different chips), the jitter offsets are used.
The computed offsets are then the input for the stacking algorithm. A co-added, cosmic ray free image is produced for each association. This high level product is therefore an image ready to be analyzed and reduced.
In order to check the cross-correlation results, we ran on some selected stellar fields the DAOPHOT suite. After tuning the fitting parameters, we were able to reproduce very well the cross-correlation results, giving us a third independent algorithm for the offsets. At the same time, stellar photometry is also performed and elementary information on sky background for each exposures part of an association is available.
There are, at the time of writing, about 20.000 WFPC2 associations ready to undergo the next step: data mining.
To deal with the massive number of images, and of objects on those images,
an automatic pipeline is being constructed.
Different levels are foreseen in such a pipeline:
bject detection: Objects will be detected on those associations,
along with preliminary rough measurements of both objects and background,
using standard packages (e.g., SExtractor (Bertin & Arnouts
1996),
bject measurements: Various pipelines can be plugged in at this stage, depending
on the image characteristics. E.g., DAOPHOT can be run onto
stellar fields, GALPHOT onto galactic fields, etc.;
ata Mining: The measurements will be stored in a database.
Different database systems (SYBASE IQ, Objectivity, etc.
are under evaluation. Dedicated user interfaces are being designed
(Dowler et al. 2000, Schade et al. 2000);
uality Control: The quality of the extracted magnitudes has been
preliminary assessed onto some Medium Deep Survey fields (Malloci 1999);
the agreement of the SExtractor magnitudes with the MDS
magnitudes is generally good, and show a maximum discrepancy of about 0.6
mag at the fainter end. More assessments against published measurements
are required (more fields, different filters).
Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393
Crabtree, D. R., Durand, D., Gaudet, S., Hill, N., & Pirenne, B. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes (San Francisco: ASP), 505
Dowler, P., Schade, D., Zingle, R., Durand, D., & Gaudet, S. 2000, this volume, 211
Malloci, G., master thesis, in preparation
Micol, A., Pirenne, B., & Bristow, P. 1997
"Associations of WFPC2 Exposures"
HST Calibration with a New Generation of Instruments,
ed. S. Casertano, (Baltimore: STScI), 349
Micol, A., Pirenne, B., & Bristow, P. 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 145, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VII, ed. R. Albrecht, R. N. Hook, & H. A. Bushouse (San Francisco: ASP), 45
Schade, D., Dowler, P., & Durand, D. 2000, this volume, 215