Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.adass.org/adass/proceedings/adass99/P2-36/
Дата изменения: Fri Oct 13 02:32:06 2000
Дата индексирования: Tue Oct 2 06:29:47 2012
Кодировка:

Поисковые слова: crab nebula
TwoFitlines: An Spectrum and Line Analysis Tool Next: A New IRAF Catalog Access Tool for Astrometry
Up: Iraf Packages
Previous: A Spectroscopy Exposure Time Calculator for IRAF
Table of Contents - Subject Index - Author Index - PS reprint -

Acosta-Pulido, J. A. 2000, in ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 216, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IX, eds. N. Manset, C. Veillet, D. Crabtree (San Francisco: ASP), 663

TwoFitlines: An Spectrum and Line Analysis Tool

J. A. Acosta-Pulido
Institituto Astrofísica de Canarias, 38200 La Laguna - SPAIN

Abstract:

Twofitlines is a tool developed within IRAF, optimized to be used with data containing multiple spectra along the spatial axis of the detector. A given spectral feature can be decomposed in one or several Gaussian components. The results are obtained in handy graphical and text formats. The error in the fitted parameters is estimated by successive fits to Montecarlo simulated spectra. An extra capability allows to measure useful asymmetry parameters for non-resolved spectral features.


1. Motivation

Twofitlines is a task developed to facilitate the analysis of spectroscopic data, containing multiple spectra along the spatial axis of the detector. These type of data are produced by longslit, multislits or fiber spectrographs. The basic requirements to build such tool were:

2. How was it done?

There exist tools in IRAF which allows to measure spectral line features using different profiles, for instance splot, fitprofs, and specfit. These three tasks cover most of the above requirements, although each of them has its own limitations. Some time ago, we decided to take what was considered the best from each task and put it together into a unique task. The final result closely resembles those mentioned tasks. The programming language is SPP, and it is structured as a mini-package in IRAF called twofitlines, although the task actually doing the work is called fitlines. The tool is available at the ftp address ftp://ftp.iac.es/pub/users/jacosta/twofitlines.tar.gz.

3. Program Features

Spectra can be read from images in a variety of IRAF formats for spectroscopic data.The basic input parameters are a fitting region, a list of initial positions and widths, plus some constrains. The program can be used in both interactive or background modes. The main features of fitlines are described below:
1.
Two minimization algorithms can be selected, Levenberg-Marquadt or Simplex;
2.
The uncertainty of model parameters is determined by a number of repeated fits to simulated data in the following way:
i.
An specified model with a given number of components is fit to the selected spectral region, obtaining the best fitting model parameters;
ii.
Random Gaussian noise is added to each pixel value as computed from the best fitting model. Two type of noises can be added: the noise amplitude is uniform along the spectrum, or based in Poisson statistics;
iii.
A new model is fitted to the simulated spectrum, taking as starting values those recently obtained. The new parameter models are saved temporarily. After a number of tries the error of each fitting parameter is computed as the standard deviation.
3.
Output results in non-interactive mode can be saved in graphical and text formats for later inspection;
4.
Initial values for a fit can be read from a database file. This file can be manually edited or directly created from a successful fit. This is very useful for non-interactive processing of large amount of data.

Figure 1: List of available parameters in interactive modes.

3.1. Interactive Commands

A variety of commands are available in interactive mode, which allow to perform any model fit, output the results and saving the parameters to be used as initial values for next fitting operations (see Figure 1).

3.2. Outputs

The results of the fitting process are the computed parameters (line center, amplitude and width), the flux and the equivalent width for each component. The flux included within the limits of the selected spectral feature is also computed by simply adding each spectrum bin after continuum subtraction. The goodness of the fit can be easily assessed from the comparison of the total flux which results from the addition of all model components and the direct sum just mentioned. The reliability of each model component is also inferred from the S/N ratio, i.e. the line peak to the continuum noise ratio (see Figure 2).

3.3. Parameter Constrains

Sometimes it is worth to set relationships in between some components parameters, e.g. if two emission lines are expected to come from the same region the width could be the same, or to fix the ratio between intensity of line sets, give same center offsets to line sets. One of the remarkable features of fitlines is the capability to set model fit constrains in a flexible and interactive way. At the moment there are four ways of setting constrains for each parameter group: (1) all vary freely; (2) all are fixed to the initial values; (3) only the value for one component varies and the others are offset/scaled by a the initial values; and (4) for each component one parameter can be set to vary independently, fixed to a specific value or to be tight to another component. An example of the last type is presented in Figure 2. The emission line complex H$\alpha $+[NII] $\lambda \lambda 6548, 6584$ is modeled including physical constrains. There are two components per line of similar width plus a broad one for H$\alpha $. The kinematically coupled components obey the following conditions: same line width, constant wavelength offset, and constant flux ratio for [NII] $\lambda \lambda 6548, 6584$.

3.4. Parameterizing Line Profiles

Spectral features show in many occasions complex line profiles, or relatively smooth asymmetric profiles which reflect the complex internal velocity field of the emission source or the poor spectral or spatial resolution of our spectra. In these cases the decomposition into a number of Gaussian components does not produce a set of meaningful parameters. More general approaches have been proposed (Whittle 1985; Heckman et al. 1981), such as measuring the width, the center and asymmetry at different heights of the profile. The two above parameterizations are included in the program fitlines and can be applied to any 1-D or 2-D spectrum.




References


Heckman, T. M., Butcher, H. R., Miley, G. K., & van Breugel, W. J. M 1981, ApJ, 247, 403

Whittle, M. 1985, MNRAS, 213, 1


© Copyright 2000 Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, California 94112, USA
Next: A New IRAF Catalog Access Tool for Astrometry
Up: Iraf Packages
Previous: A Spectroscopy Exposure Time Calculator for IRAF
Table of Contents - Subject Index - Author Index - PS reprint -

adass@cfht.hawaii.edu