Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://uneex.mithril.cs.msu.su/static/MaximumRPMBook/max-rpm.pdf Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Mon Sep 26 12:35:47 2011 Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Mon Oct 1 23:01:00 2012 Êîäèðîâêà: Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: c0 f0 ef 2081

Maximum RPM
Max. RPM

Taking the Red Hat Package Manager to the Limit
1.0 17-February-1997 First edition (Produced/printed by Red Hat Software) 1.1 ??-???-1997 Revised for production by Sams Publishing 1.2 29-February-2000 Translated into DocBook
Edition: 2


ISBN: 1-888172-78-9 First edition printed February, 1997 Sams first edition printed ???, 1999 Sams first edition reprinted ???, 1999 Red Hat, Inc. 2600 Meridian Parkway Durham , NC 27709 US 919-547-0012 919-547-0024 docs@redhat.com 13588 Research Triangle Park , NC 27713

Edward C. Bailey Red Hat, Inc. ed@redhat.com

© 2000 Red Hat, Inc. Copyright © 2000 by Red Hat, Inc. This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set for th in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later (the latest version is presently available at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/). Distribution of the work or derivative of the work in any standard (paper) book form is prohibited unless prior permission is obtained from the copyright holder.

ii


To Deb -- My lover, editor, indexer, and friend... To Matt, who heard "Daddy can't play right now" far too often...

iii


Contents
Maximum RPM

Preface

...................................... Linux and RPM -- A Brief History . . . Par ts of the book, and Who They're Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.... .... For ....

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

xi xi xii xiii

Part I

RPM and Computer Users -- How to Use RPM to Effectively Manage Your Computer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . An Introduction to Package Management
What are Packages, and Why Manage Package Management: How to Do It? . RPM Design Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What's in a package? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Let's Get Star ted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Them? ......... ......... ......... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 17 21 26 28 30 33 36 38 41 42 61 62 62 64 68 69

Chapter 1

Chapter 2
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4

Using RPM to Install Packages
rpm -i -- What does it do? . Performing an Install . . . . . . . Two handy options . . . . . . . . . . Additional options to rpm -i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 3
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5

Using RPM to Erase Packages
rpm -e -- What Does it Erasing a Package . . . . . Additional Options . . . . . . rpm -e and Config files . Watch Out! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Do? ..... ..... ..... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

iv


Chapter 4
4.1 4.2 4.3

Using RPM to Upgrade Packages . . rpm -U -- What Does it Do? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Upgrading a Package . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . They're Nearly Identical... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71 74 78 79 83 86 86 114 119 121 124 126 134 137 137 138 139 147 147 151 155

Chapter 5
5.1 5.2 5.3

. rpm -q -- What does it do? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Par ts of an RPM Query . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Few Handy Queries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Getting Information About Packages

Chapter 6
6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4

Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages
rpm -V -- What Does it Do? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . When Verification Fails -- rpm -V Output Selecting What to Verify, and How . . . . . . . . We've Lied to You... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 7
7.1 7.2 7.3

Using RPM to Verify Package Files . . rpm -K -- What Does it Do? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Configuring PGP for rpm -K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Using rpm -K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Miscellania. . . Other RPM Options . . Using rpm2cpio . . . . . . . Source Package Files
..... ..... ..... and ...... ...... ...... How .... .... .... To ..... ..... ..... Use ........ ........ ........ Them . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 8
8.1 8.2 8.3

Part II RPM and Developers -- How to Distribute Your Software More Easily With RPM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 9
9.1 9.2

. . . . . . . 159

The Philosophy Behind RPM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 Pristine Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 Easy Builds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163

v


9.3 9.4 9.5

Multi-architecture/operating system Suppor t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 Easier For Your Users . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 To Summarize... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 167 170 171 172 173 173 174 174 182 187

Chapter 10 The Basics of Developing With RPM
10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 The The The And Inputs . . Engine: Outputs Now... . ....... RPM ....... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 11 Building Packages: A Simple Example
11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 Creating the Build Directory Getting the Sources . . . . . . . . . Creating the Spec File . . . . . . Star ting the Build . . . . . . . . . . . . When Things Go Wrong . . . . Structure ........... ........... ........... ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 12 rpm -b Command Reference
12.1 12.2

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 rpm -b -- What Does it Do? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 Other Build-related Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 ......... Comments: Notes Ignored by RPM . . . . . Tags: Data Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Scripts: RPM's Workhorse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Macros: Helpful Shor thand for Package The %files List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Directives For the %files list . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Lone Directive: %package . . . . . . . . . . Conditionals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... .......... .......... .......... Builders .......... .......... .......... .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 225 225 244 252 267 267 275 276

Chapter 13 Inside the Spec File
13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.7 13.8

Chapter 14 Adding Dependency Information to a Package
14.1

. . 281 An Overview of Dependencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281

vi


14.2 14.3 14.4

Automatic Dependencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282 Manual Dependencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 To Summarize... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 293 294 295 298 307 307 313 317 321 321 321 325 333 333 333 334 335 345 347

Chapter 15 Making a Relocatable Package
15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 Why relocatable packages? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The prefix tag: Relocation Central . . . . . . . . . Relocatable Wrinkles: Things to Consider Building a Relocatable Package . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 16 Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere
16.1 16.2 16.3

.. Using Build Roots in a Package. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Having RPM Use a Different Build Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Specifying File Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Why Sign a Package? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Getting Ready to Sign. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Signing Packages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... What Are Subpackages? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Why Are They Needed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Our Example Spec File: Subpackages Galore! . . . . Spec File Changes For Subpackages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Build-Time Scripts: Unchanged For Subpackages Building Subpackages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 17 Adding PGP Signatures to a Package
17.1 17.2 17.3

Chapter 18 Creating Subpackages
18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6

Chapter 19 Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19.1 19.2 19.3

. . 353 Architectures and Operating Systems: A Primer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353 What Does RPM Do To Make Multi-Platform Packaging Easier? . . . . . . . . . . . 354 Build and Install Platform Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355

vii


19.4 19.5 19.6 19.7

optflags -- The Other rpmrc File Entry Platform-Dependent Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Platform-Dependent Conditionals. . . . . . . Hints and Kinks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. .. .. ..

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

359 360 361 364 367 367 368 374 385 407 407 407 435

Chapter 20 Real-World Package Building
20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 An Overview of Amanda . . . . Initial Building Without RPM Initial Building With RPM . . . Package Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 21 A Guide to the RPM Library API
21.1 21.2 21.3

... An Overview of rpmlib. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmlib Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Example Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part III Appendixes
A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 ........... ............ ............ ............ command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447 447 448 463 465 467 467 468 473 473

Appendix A Format of the RPM File
RPM File Naming Convention RPM File Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tools For Studying RPM Files Identifying RPM files with the ...... Using the ­showrc Option . . . . Different Places an rpmrc File rpmrc File Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmrc File Entries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ........ ........ file(1)

Appendix B The rpmrc File
B.1 B.2 B.3 B.4

........... ........... Resides ........... ...........

. . . . .

Appendix C Concise RPM Command Reference
C.1 C.2

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483 Global Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483 Informational Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483

viii


C.3 C.4 C.5 C.6 C.7 C.8 C.9 C.10 C.11 C.12 C.13 C.14 C.15

Query Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Verify Mode. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Install Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Upgrade Mode . . . . . . . . . . . Erase Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Build Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rebuild Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . Recompile Mode . . . . . . . . . Resign Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add Signature Mode . . . . Check Signature Mode . . Initalize Database Mode Rebuild Database Mode

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

483 485 485 486 487 488 489 489 489 489 490 490 490

Appendix D Available Tags For ­queryformat
D.1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491 List of ­queryformat Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505 505 505 513 516 520 520 523 523 527 527 531 533 534 534

Appendix E Concise Spec File Reference
E.1 E.2 E.3 E.4 E.5 E.6 E.7 E.8 Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Preamble . . . . . . . . . . . . Scripts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Macros . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The %files List . . . . . . . . . . . Directives For the %files The %package Directive Conditionals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .... .... .... .... list .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Appendix F RPM-related Resources
F.1 F.2 F.3 F.4 F.5 Where to Get RPM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Where to Talk About RPM . . . . . . . . . . . RPM On the World Wide Web . . . . . . RPM's License . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ix


Appendix G An Introduction to PGP
G.1 G.2

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 543 PGP -- Privacy for Regular People. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 543 Installing PGP for RPM's Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 546

x


Section 0.1:Linux and RPM -- A Brief History

xi

Preface
Linux and RPM -- A Brief History
Welcome! This is a book about the Red Hat Package Manager or, as it is known to it's friends, RPM. The history of RPM is inextricably linked to the history of Linux, so a bit of Linux history may be in order. Linux is a full-featured implementation of a UNIX-like operating system, and has taken the computing world by storm. And for good reason -- With the addition of Linux, an Intel-based personal computer that had previously been prisoner of the dreaded Windows hourglass is transformed into a fully multitasking, network capable, personal workstation. All for the cost of the time required to download, install, and configure the software. Of course, if you're not the type to tinker with downloaded software, many companies have created CDROMs containing Linux and associated software. The amount of tinkering required with these distributions has varied widely. The phrase "You get what you pay for" is never more true than in the area of Linux distributions. One distribution bears the curious name "Red Hat Linux". Produced by a company of the same name, this Linux distribution was different. One of the key decisions a new Linux user needs to make is which of the many different parts of the distribution to install on their system. Most distributions use some sort of menu, making it easy to pick and choose. Red Hat Linux is no different. But what is different about Red Hat Linux is that the creators of the distribution wanted their customers to have the the ability to make the same choices long after the installation process was over. Some commercial UNIX systems have this capability (called "package management"), and a few Linux distributors were trying to come up with something similar, but none had the extensive scope present in RPM. Over time, Red Hat Linux has become the most popular distribution available today. For it to edge out the previous leader (known as Slackware) in just two years is amazing. There has to be a reason for this kind of success, and a good part of the reason is RPM. But until now, there has been precious little in terms of RPM documentation. You could say that RPM's ease of use has made detailed instructions practically unnecessary, and you'd be right.


xii

Preface

However, there are always people that want to know more about their computers, and given the popularity of Red Hat Linux, this alone would have made a book on RPM worthwhile. But there's more to the story than that. There is a truism in the world of free software, that goes something like this: If there's a better solution freely available, use it! RPM is no exception to the rule. Put under the terms of the GNU General Public License (Meaning: RPM cannot be made proprietary by anyone, not even Bill Gates), RPM started to attract the attention of others in the Linux, Unix, and free software communities. At present, RPM is used by several commercial software companies producing Linux applications. They find that RPM makes it easier to get their products into the hands of their customers. They also find that it can even make the process of building their software easier. (Those of you that develop software for fun and profit, stick around -- the second half of this book will show you everything you need to know to get your software "RPM-ized") People have also ported RPM to several commercial UNIX systems, including DEC's Digital Unix, IBM's AIX, and Silicon Graphics' IRIX. Why? The simple answer is that it makes it easier to install, upgrade, and de-install software. If all these people are using RPM, shouldn't you?

Parts of the book, and Who They're For
This book is divided into two major sections. The first section is for anyone that needs to know how to use RPM on their system. Given the state of the Linux arena today, this could include just about anyone, including people that are new to Linux, or even UNIX. So those of you that think that
ls -FAl !*|less

is serious magic (or maybe even a typing error), relax -- we'll explain everything you'll need to know in the first section. In the book's second half, we'll be covering all there is to know about building packages using RPM. Since software engineering on Linux and UNIX systems requires in-depth knowledge of the operating system, available tools, and basic programming


Section 0.3:Acknowledgements

xiii

concepts, we're going to assume that the reader has sufficient background in these areas. Feel free to browse through the second half, but don't hesitate to seek additional sources of information if you find the going a bit tough.

Acknowledgements
Writing a book is similar to entering a long-term relationship with an obsessive partner. Throughout the nine months it took to write this book, life went on: job changes, births, deaths, and even a hurricane. Throughout it all, the book demanded constant attention. Therefore, I'd like to thank the people that made it possible to focus on the book to the exclusion of nearly everything else. My wife, Deb and son, Matt supported and encouraged me throughout, even when I was little more than a reclusive houseguest hunched over the computer in the study. Additionally, Deb acted as my editor and indexer, eventually reading the book completely three times! Thank you both. Thanks also to Marc Ewing and Erik Troan, RPM architects extraordinaire. Without their programming savvy, RPM wouldn't be the elegant tool it is. Without their boundless patience, my many questions would have gone unanswered, and this book would have been much less than it is now. I hope you find this book a worthy companion to your programming handiwork. Rik Faith provided some much-needed information about PMS and PM, two of RPM's ancestors. Thank you! Finally a great big thank you goes to Jessica and the gang at L'il Dinos, Jennifer and her crew at the Cary Barnes & Noble coffee shop, and Mom and her "kids" at Schlotzsky's Deli in Durham. If all of you hadn't let me sit around for hours writing, this book wouldn't be nearly as fat as it is. And neither would I! February, 1997 Cary, North Carolina


xiv

Preface


Part I RPM and Computer Users -- How to Use RPM to Effectively Manage Your Computer



Section 1.1:What are Packages, and Why Manage Them?

17

1 An Introduction to Package Management
1.1 What are Packages, and Why Manage Them?
To answer that question, let's go back to the basics for a moment. Computers process information. In order for this to happen, there are some prerequisites: · · · A computer (Obviously!). Some information to process (Also obvious!). A program to do the processing (Still pretty obvious!).

Unless these three things come together very little is going to happen, information processing-wise. But each of these items have their own requirements that need to be satisfied before things can get exciting. Take the computer, for example. While it needs things like electricity and a cool, dry place to operate, it also needs access to the other two items -- information and programs -- in order to do its thing. The way to get information and programs into a computer is to place them in the computer's mass storage. These days, mass storage invariably means a disk drive. Putting information and programs on the disk drive means that they are stored as files. So much for the computer's part in this. OK, let's look at the information. Does information have any particular needs? Well, it needs sufficient space on the disk drive, but more importantly, it needs to be in the proper format for the program that will be processing it. That's it for information. Finally, we have the program. What does it need? Like the information, it needs sufficient disk space on the disk drive. But there are many other things that it may need: · · It may need information to process, in the correct format, named properly, and in the appropriate area on a disk drive somewhere. It may need one or more configuration files. These are files that control the program's behavior and permit some level of customization. Like the information,


18

Chapter 1:An Introduction to Package Management

these files must be in the proper format, named properly, and in the appropriate area on a disk. We'll be referring to them by their other name -- config files -- throughout the book. · · · It may need work areas on a disk, named properly, and located in the appropriate area. It may even need other programs, each with their own requirements. Although not strictly required by the program itself, the program may come with one or more files containing documentation. These files can be very handy for the humans trying to get the program to do their bidding!

As you can imagine, this can get pretty complicated. It's not so bad once everything is set up properly, but how do things get set up properly in the first place? There are two possibilities: 1. After reading the documentation that comes with the program you'd like to use, you copy the various programs, configuration files, and information onto your computer, making sure they are all named correctly, are located in the proper place, and that there is sufficient disk space to hold them all. You make the appropriate changes to the configuration file(s). Finally, you run any setup programs that are necessary, giving them whatever information they require to do their job. You let the computer do it. you'll need over 20,000 configuring! of the same!

2.

If it seems like the first choice isn't so bad, consider how many files to keep track of. On a typical Linux system, it's not unusual to have different files. That's a lot of documentation reading, file copying, and And what happens when you want a newer version of a program? More

Some people think the second alternative is easier. RPM was made for them.

1.1.1 Enter the Package
When you consider that computers are very good at keeping track of large amounts of data, the idea of giving your computer the job of riding herd over 20,000 files seems like a good one. And that's exactly what package management software does. But what is a "package"?


Section 1.1:What are Packages, and Why Manage Them?

19

A package in the computer sense is very similar to a package in the physical sense. Both are methods of keeping related objects together in the same place. Both need to be opened before the contents can be used. Both can have a "packing slip" taped to the side, identifying the contents. Normally, package management systems take all the various files containing programs, data, documentation, and configuration information, and place them in one specially formatted file -- a package file. In the case of RPM, the package file is sometimes called a "package", a ".rpm file", or even an "RPM". All mean the same thing -- a package containing software meant to be installed using RPM. What types of software are normally found in a package? There are no hard and fast rules, but normally a package's contents consist of one of the following types of software: · A collection of one or more programs that perform a single well-defined task. This is normally what people think of as an "application". Word processors and programming languages would fit into this category. A specific part of an operating system. Examples might be system initialization scripts, a particular command shell, or the software required to support a web server, for example.

·

Advantages of a Package One of the most obvious benefits to having a package is that the package is one easily manageable chunk. If you move it from one place to another, there's no risk of any part getting left behind. But although this is the most obvious advantage, it's not the biggest one. The biggest advantage is that the package can contain the knowledge about what it takes to install itself on your computer. And if the package contains the steps required to install itself, the package can also contain the steps required to uninstall itself. What used to be a painful manual process is now a straightforward procedure. What used to be a mass of 20,000 files becomes a couple hundred packages.


20

Chapter 1:An Introduction to Package Management

1.1.2 Manage Your Packages, or They Will Manage You
A couple hundred? Even though the use of packages has decreased the complexity of managing a system by an order of magnitude, it hasn't yet gotten to the level of being a "no-brainer". It's still necessary to keep track of what packages are installed on your system. And if there are some packages that require other packages in order to install or operate correctly, these should be tracked as well. Packages Lead Active Lives If you start looking at a computer system as a collection of packages, you'll find that a distinct set of operations will take place on those packages time and time again: · New packages are installed. Maybe it's a spreadsheet you'll use to keep track of expenses, or the latest shoot-em-up game, but in either case it's new and you want it. Old packages are replaced with newer versions. Whoever wrote the word processor you use daily, comes out with a new version. You'll probably want to install the new version and remove the old one. Packages are removed entirely. Perhaps that over-hyped strategy game just didn't cut it. You have better things to do with that disk space, so get rid of it!

·

·

With this much activity going on, it's easy to lose track of things. What types of package information should be available to keep you informed? Keeping Track of Packages Just as there are certain operations that are performed on packages, there are also certain types of information that will make it easier to make sense of the packages installed on your system: · · Certainly you'd like to be able to see what packages are installed. It's easy to forget if that fax program you tried a few months ago is still installed or not. It would be nice to be able to get more detailed information on a specific package. This might consist of anything from the date the package was installed, to a list of files it installed on your system.


Section 1.2:Package Management: How to Do It?

21

·

Being able to access this information in a variety of ways can be helpful, too. Instead of simply finding out what files a package installed, it might be handy to be able to name a particular file and find out which package installed it. If this amount of detail is possible, then it should be possible to see if the way a package is presently installed varies from the way it was originally installed. It's not at all unusual to make a mistake and delete one file -- or a hundred. Being able to tell if one or more packages are missing files could greatly simplify the process of getting an ailing system back on its feet again. Files containing configuration information can be a real headache. If it were possible to pay extra attention to these files and make sure any changes made to them weren't lost, life would certainly be a lot easier.

·

·

1.2 Package Management: How to Do It?
Well, all that sounds great -- easy install, upgrade, and deletion of packages; getting package information presented several different ways; making sure packages are installed correctly; and even tracking changes to config files. But how do you do it? As mentioned above, the obvious answer is to let the computer do it. Many groups have tried to create package management software. There are two basic approaches: 1. 2. Some package management systems concentrate on the specific steps required to manipulate a package. Other package management systems take a different approach, keeping track of the files on the system and manipulating packages by concentrating on the files involved.

Each approach has its good and bad points. In the first method, it's easy to install new packages, somewhat difficult to remove old ones, and almost impossible to obtain any meaningful information about installed packages. The second method makes it easy to obtain information about installed packages, and fairly easy to install and remove packages. The main problem using this method is


22

Chapter 1:An Introduction to Package Management

that there may not be a well-defined way to execute any commands required during the installation or removal process. In practice, no package management system uses one approach or the other -- all are a mixture of the two. The exact mix and design goals will dictate how well a particular package management system meets the needs of the people using it. At the time Red Hat started work on their Linux distribution, there were a number of package management systems in use, each with a different approach to making package management easier.

1.2.1 Ancestors of RPM
Since this is a book on the Red Hat Package Manager, a good way to see what RPM is all about is to look at the package management software that preceded RPM. RPP RPP was used in the first Red Hat Linux distributions. Many of RPP's features would be recognizable to anyone who has worked with RPM. Some of these innovative features are: · · · · Simple, one command installation and uninstallation of packages. Scripts that can run before and after installation and uninstallation of packages. Package verification. The files of individual packages can be checked to see that they haven't been modified since they were installed. Powerful querying. The database of packages can be queried for information about installed packages, including file lists, descriptions and more.

While RPP possessed several of the features that were important enough to continue on as parts of RPM today, it had some weaknesses, too: · It didn't use "pristine sources". Every program is made up of programming language statements stored in files. This source code is later translated into a binary language that the computer can execute. In the case of RPP, its packages were based on source code that had been modified specifically for RPP, hence the


Section 1.2:Package Management: How to Do It?

23

sources weren't pristine. This is a bad idea for a number of fairly technical reasons. Not using pristine sources made it difficult for package developers to keep things straight, particularly if they were building hundreds of different packages. · It couldn't guarantee executables were built from packaged sources. The process of building a package for RPP was such that there was no way to ensure the executable programs were built from the source code contained in an RPP source package. Once again, this was a problem for the package builder, especially those who had large numbers of packages to build. It had no support for multiple architectures. As people started using RPP, it became obvious that the package managers that were unable to simplify the process of building packages for more than one architecture, or type of computer, were going to be at a disadvantage. This was a problem, particularly for Red Hat, as they were starting to look at the possibility of creating Linux distributions for other architectures, such as the Digital Alpha.

·

Even with these problems, RPP was one of the things that made the first Red Hat Linux distributions unique. Its ability to simplify the process of installing software was a real boon to many of Red Hat's customers, particularly those with little experience in Linux. PMS While Red Hat was busy with RPP, another group of Linux devotees were hard at work with their package management system. Known as PMS, its development, lead by Rik Faith, attacked the problem of package management from a slightly different viewpoint. Like RPP, PMS was used to package a Linux distribution. This distribution was known as the BOGUS distribution, and all the software in it was built from original unmodified sources. Any changes that were required were patched in during the processing of building the software. This is the concept of "pristine sources" and is PMS's most important contribution to RPM. The importance of pristine sources can not be overstated. It allows the packager to quickly release new version of software, and to immediately see what changes were made to the software.


24

Chapter 1:An Introduction to Package Management

The chief disadvantages of PMS were weak querying ability, no package verification, no multiple architecture support, and poor database design. PM Later, Rik Faith and Doug Hoffman, working under contract for Red Hat, produced PM. The design combined all the important features of RPP and PM, including one command installation and uninstallation, scripts run before and after installation and uninstallation, package verification, advanced querying, and pristine sources. However it retained RPP's and PM's chief disadvantages: weak database design and no support for multiple architectures. PM was very close to a viable package management system, but it wasn't quite ready for prime time. It was never used in a commercially available product. RPM Version 1 With two major forays into package management behind them, Marc Ewing and Erik Troan went to work on a third attempt. This one would be called the Red Hat Package Manager, or RPM. Although it built on the experiences of PM, PMS, under the hood. Written in the Perl programming creation of RPM version 1 focused on addressing cases, the flaws were eliminated, while in others, Some of the successes of RPM version 1 were: · Automatic handling of configuration files. The contents of config files are often changed from what they were in the original package, making it hard for a package manager to know how a particular config file should be handled during installs, upgrades, and erasures. PM made an attempt at config file handling, but in RPM it was improved further. In many respects, this feature is the key to RPM's power and flexibility. Ease of rebuilding large numbers of packages. By making it easy for people who were trying to create a Linux distribution consisting of several hundred packages, RPM was a step in the right direction. and RPP, RPM was quite different language for fast development, the the flaws of its ancestors. In some the problems remained.

·


Section 1.2:Package Management: How to Do It?

25

·

It was easy to use. Many of the concepts used in RPP had withstood the test of time and were used in RPM. For instance, the ability to verify the installation of a package was one of the features that set RPP apart. It was adapted and expanded in RPM version 1.

But RPM version 1 wasn't perfect. There were a number of flaws, some of them major: · It was slow. While the use of Perl made RPM's development proceed more quickly, it also meant that RPM wouldn't run as quickly as it would have, had it been written in C. Its database design was fragile. Unfortunately, under RPM version 1 it was not unusual for there to be problems with the database. While the approach of dedicating a database to package management was a good idea, the implementation used in RPM version 1 left a lot to be desired. It was big. This is another artifact of using Perl. Normally, RPM's size requirements were not an issue, except for one area. When performing an initial system install, RPM was run from a small, floppy-based system environment. The need to have Perl available meant space on the boot floppies was always a problem. It didn't support multiple architectures (types of computers) well. The need to have a package manager support more than one type of computer hadn't been acknowledged before. With RPM version 1, an initial stab was taken at the problem, but the implementation was incomplete. Nonetheless, RPM had been ported to a number of other computer systems. It was becoming obvious that the issue of multi-architecture support was not going away and had to be addressed. The package file format wasn't extensible. This made it very difficult to add functionality, since any change to the file format would cause older versions of RPM to break.

·

·

·

·

Even though their Linux distribution was a success, and RPM was much of the reason for it, Marc and Erik knew that some changes were going to be necessary to carry RPM to the next level.


26

Chapter 1:An Introduction to Package Management

The RPM of Today: Version 2 Looking back on their experiences with RPM version 1, Marc and Erik made a major change to RPM's design: They rewrote it entirely in C. This did wonderful things to RPM's speed and size. Querying the database was quicker now, and there was no need to have Perl around just to do package management. In addition, the database format was redesigned to improve both performance and reliability. Displaying package information can take as little as a tenth of the time spent in RPM version 1, for example. Realizing RPM's potential in the non-Linux arena, they also of RPM routines that allow the use of RPM functionality in ability to function on more than one architecture was also package file format was made more extensible, clearing the ments to RPM. created rpmlib, a library other programs. RPM's enhanced. Finally, the way for future enhance-

So is RPM perfect? No program can ever reach perfection, and RPM is no exception. But as a package manager that can run on several different types of systems, RPM has a lot to offer, and it will only get better. Let's take a look at the design criteria that drove the development of RPM.

1.3 RPM Design Goals
The design goals of RPM could best be summed up with the phrase "something for everyone". While the main reason for the existence of RPM was to make it easier for Red Hat to build the several hundred packages that comprised their Linux distribution, it was not the only reason RPM was created. Let's take a look at the various requirements the Red Hat team used in their design of RPM:

1.3.1 Make it easy to get packages on and off the system
As we've seen earlier in this chapter, the act of installing a package can involve many complex steps. Entrusting these steps to a person who may not have the necessary experience is a strategy for failure. So the goal for RPM was to make it as easy as possible for anyone to install packages. The same holds true for removing packages.


Section 1.3:RPM Design Goals

27

It is a complex and error-prone operation, and one that RPM should handle for the user. The other side of this issue is that RPM should give the package builder almost total control in terms of how the package is installed. The reason for this is simple: if the package builders do their homework, their package should install and uninstall properly.

1.3.2 Make it easy to verify a package was installed correctly
Because software problems are a fact of life, the ability to verify the proper installation of a package is vital. If done properly, it should be possible to catch a variety of problems, including things such as missing or modified files.

1.3.3 Make it easy for the package builder
While we're dedicating an entire book to package management, in reality it should be a small portion of the package builder's job. Why? They've got better things to do! If they are the people that are actually creating the software to be packaged, that's where they should be spending the majority of their time. Even if the package builder isn't actually writing software, they still have better things to do than worry about building packages. For instance, they may be responsible for building many packages. The less time spent on building an individual package translates to more packages that can be built.

1.3.4 Make it start with the original source code
Delving a bit more into the package builder's world, it was deemed important that RPM start with the original, unmodified source code. Why is this so important? Using the original sources makes it possible to separate the changes required to build the package from any changes implemented to fix bugs, add new features, or anything else. This is a good thing for package builders, since many of them are not the original authors of the programs they package. This separation makes it easy, months down the road, to know exactly what changes were made in order to get the package to build. This is important when a new version of the packaged software becomes available. Many times it's only necessary to apply


28

Chapter 1:An Introduction to Package Management

the original "package building" changes to the newer software. At worst, the changes provide a starting point to determine what sorts of things might need to be changed in the new version.

1.3.5 Make it work on different computer architectures
One of the tougher things for a package builder to do is to take a program, make it run on more than one type of computer, and distribute packages for each. Because RPM makes it easy to take a program's original source code, add the changes necessary to get it to build, and produce a package for each architecture in one step, it can be pretty handy.

1.4 What's in a package?
With all the magical things we've claimed that package management software in general (and RPM in particular) can do, you'd think there was a tiny computer guru bundled in every package. However, the reality is not that magical. Here's a quick overview of the more important parts of an RPM package 1.

1.4.1 RPM's Package Labels
Every package built for RPM has to have a specific set of information that uniquely identifies it. We call this information a package label. Here are two sample package labels: · · nls-1.0-1 perl-5.001m-4

While these labels look like they have very little in common, in fact they all follow RPM's package labelling convention. There are three different components in every package label. Let's look at each one in order: Component #1: The Software's Name Every package label begins with the name of the software. The name may be derived from the name of the application packaged, or it may be a name describing a group
1 See Appendix A, Format of the RPM File for complete details on the contents of a .rpm file.


Section 1.4:What's in a package?

29

of related programs bundled together by the package builder. The software names in the packages listed above are: nls and perl. As you can see, the software name is separated from the rest of the package label by a dash. Component #2: The Software's Version Next in the package label is an identifier that describes the version of the software being packaged. If the package builder bundled a number of related programs together, the software version is probably a number of their own choosing. However, if the package consists of one major application, the software version normally comes directly from the application's developer. The actual version specification is quite flexible, as can be seen in the examples above. The versions shown are: 1.0 and 5.001m. A dash separates the software version from the remainder of the package label. Component #3: The Package's Release The package release is the most unambiguous part of a package label. It is a number chosen by the package builder. It reflects the number of times the package has been rebuilt using the same version software. Normally, the rebuilds are due to bugs uncovered after the package has been in use for a while. By tradition, the package release starts at 1. The package releases in the example above are: 1 and 4.

1.4.2 Labels And Names: Similar, But Distinct
Package labels are used internally by RPM. For installed package, it will respond with a list of is created, part of the filename consists of the requirement for this, but it does make it easier example, if you package labels. package label. to keep track of ask RPM to list every When a package file There is no technical things.

However, a package file may be renamed, and the new filename won't confuse RPM in the least. That's because the package label is contained within the file. For a fairly technical view of the inside of a package file, refer to Appendix A, Format of the RPM File.

1.4.3 Package-wide Information
Some of the information contained in a package is general in nature. This information includes such items as:


30

Chapter 1:An Introduction to Package Management

· · · · ·

The date and time the package was built. A description of the package's contents. The total size of all the files installed by the package. Information that allows the package to be grouped with similar packages. A digital "signature" that can be used to verify the authenticity and integrity of the package. 2

1.4.4 Per-file Information
Each package also contains information about every file contained in the package. The information includes: · · · · · The name of every file and where it is to be installed. Each file's permissions. Each file's owner and group specifications. The MD5 checksum of each file. The file's contents.
3

1.5 Let's Get Started
To summarize, a package management system uses the computer to keep track of all the various bits and pieces that comprise an application or an entire operating system. Most package management systems use a specially formatted file to keep everything together in a single, easily manageable entity, or package. Additionally, package management systems tend to provide one or more of the following functions: · Installing new packages.
2 For more information on RPM's signature checking capability, refer to Section 7.1, rpm -K -- What Does it Do?. 3 We'll discuss MD5 checksums in greater detail in MD5 Checksum in Section 6.1.1.


Section 1.5:Let's Get Started

31

· · ·

Removing old packages. Upgrading from an old package to a new one. Obtaining information about installed packages.

RPM has been designed with Red Hat's past package management experiences in mind. PM and RPP provided most of these functions with varying degrees of success. Marc Ewing and Erik Troan have worked hard to make RPM better than its predecessors in every way. Now it's time to see how they did, and learn how to use RPM!


32

Chapter 1:An Introduction to Package Management


Using RPM to Install Packages

33

2 Using RPM to Install Packages
Table 2­1 rpm -i Command Syntax

rpm -i (or --install) options file1.rpm ... fileN.rpm Parameters file1.rpm ... fileN.rpm -h (or --hash) --test One or more RPM package files (URLs OK) Page Section 2.3.2, -h: Perfect for the Impatient Section 2.4.2, --test: Perform Installation Tests Only Section 2.4.11, --percent: Not Meant for Human Consumption Section 2.4.7, --excludedocs: Do Not Install Documentation For This Package Section 2.4.8, --includedocs: Install Documentation For This Package Section 2.4.3, --replacepkgs: Install the Package Even If Already Installed

Install-specific Options Print hash marks ("#") during install Perform installation tests only Print percentages during install Do not install documentation

--percent

--excludedocs

--includedocs

Install documentation

--replacepkgs

Replace a package with a new copy of itself


34

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

--replacefiles

Replace files owned by another package

Section 2.4.4, --replacefiles: Install the Package Even If It Replaces Another Package's Files Section 2.4.6, --force: The Big Hammer Section 2.4.10, --noscripts: Do Not Execute Pre- and Post-install Scripts Section 2.4.9, --prefix : Relocate the package to , if possible Section 2.4.17, --ignorearch: Do Not Verify Package Architecture Section 2.4.18, --ignoreos: Do Not Verify Package Operating System Section 2.4.5, --nodeps: Do Not Check Dependencies Before Installing Package

--force --noscripts

Ignore package and file conflicts Do not execute pre- and post-install scripts

--prefix

Relocate package to if possible

--ignorearch

Do not verify package architecture

--ignoreos

Do not verify package operating system

--nodeps

Do not check dependencies


Using RPM to Install Packages

35

--ftpproxy

Use as the FTP proxy

Section 2.4.16, --ftpproxy : Use As Proxy In FTP-based Installs Section 2.4.15, --ftpport : Use In FTP-based Installs Page Section 2.3.1, Getting a bit more feedback with -v Section 2.4.1, Getting a lot more information with -vv Section 2.4.13, --root : Use As An Alternate Root

--ftpport

Use as the FTP port

General Options -v -vv Display additional information Display debugging information Set alternate root to

--root

--rcfile

Set alternate rpmrc file to Section 2.4.12, --rcfile : Use As An Alternate rpmrc File Use to find the RPM database Section 2.4.14, --dbpath : Use To Find RPM Database

--dbpath


36

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

2.1 rpm -i -- What does it do?
Of the many things RPM can do, probably the one that people think of first is the installation of software. As mentioned earlier, installing new software is a complex, error-prone job. RPM turns that process into a single command. rpm -i (--install is equivalent) installs software that's been packaged into an RPM package file. It does this by: · · · · · · · Performing dependency checks. Checking for conflicts. Performing any tasks required before the install. Deciding what to do with config files. Unpacking files from the package and putting them in the proper place. Performing any tasks required after the install. Keeping track of what it did.

Let's go through each of these steps in a bit more detail.

2.1.1 Performing dependency checks:
Some RPM ments dency packages will not operate properly unless some other package is installed, too. makes sure that the package being installed will have its dependency requiremet. It will also insure that the package's installation will not cause depenproblems for other already-installed packages.

2.1.2 Checking for conflicts:
RPM performs a number of checks during this phase. These checks look for things like attempts to install an already installed package, attempts to install an older package over a newer version, or the possibility that a file may be overwritten.


Section 2.1:rpm -i -- What does it do?

37

2.1.3 Performing any tasks required before the install:
There are cases where one or more commands must be given prior to the actual installation of a package. RPM performs these commands exactly as directed by the package builder, thus eliminating a common source of problems during installations.

2.1.4 Deciding what to do with config files:
One of the features that really sets RPM apart from other package managers, is the way it handles configuration files. Since these files are normally changed to customize the behavior of installed software, simply overwriting a config file would tend to make people angry -- all their customizations would be gone! Instead, RPM analyzes the situation and attempts to do "the right thing" with config files, even if they weren't originally installed by RPM! 1

2.1.5 Unpacking files from the package and putting them in the proper place:
This is the step most people think of when they think about installing software. Each package file contains a list of files that are to be installed, as well as their destination on your system. In addition, many other file attributes, such as permissions and ownerships, are set correctly by RPM.

2.1.6 Performing any tasks required after the install:
Very often a new package requires that one or more commands be executed after the new files are in place. An example of this would be running ldconfig to make new shared libraries accessible.

2.1.7 Keeping track of what it did:
Every time RPM installs a package on your system, it keeps track of the files it installed, in its database. The database contains a wealth of information necessary for RPM to do its job. For example, RPM uses the database when it checks for possible conflicts during an install.
1 Are you interested in what exactly "the right thing" means? Section 4.1.1, Config file magic has all the details.


38

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

2.2 Performing an Install
Let's have RPM install a package. The only thing necessary is to give the command (rpm -i) followed by the name of the package file:
# rpm -i eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm #

At this point, all the steps outlined above have been performed. The package is now installed. Note that the file name need not adhere to RPM's file naming convention:
# mv eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm baz.txt # rpm -i baz.txt #

In this case, we changed the name of the package file eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm to baz.txt and then proceeded to install the package. The result is identical to the previous install, that is, the eject-1.2-2 package successfully installed. The name of the package file, although normally incorporating the package label, is not used by RPM during the installation process. RPM uses the contents of the package file, which means that even if the file was placed on a DOS floppy and the name truncated, the installation would still proceed normally.

2.2.1 URLs -- Another Way to Specify Package Files
If you've surfed the World Wide Web, you've no doubt noticed the way web pages are identified:
http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/rpm/RPM-HOWTO/RPM-HOWTO.html

This is called a Uniform Resource Locator, or URL. RPM can also use URLs, although they look a little bit different. Here's one:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/code/rpm/rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm

The ftp: signifies that this URL is a File Transfer Protocol URL. As the name implies, this type of URL is used to move files around. The section containing


Section 2.2:Performing an Install

39

ftp.redhat.com specifies the hostname, or the name of the system where the package file resides. The remainder of the URL (/pub/redhat/code/rpm/rpm-2.31.i386.rpm) specifies the path to the package file, followed by the package file itself. RPM's use of URLs gives us the ability to install a package located on the other side of the world, with a single command:
# rpm -i ftp://ftp.gnomovision.com/pub/rpms/foobar-1.0-1.i386.rpm #

This command would use anonymous FTP to obtain the foobar version 1.0 package file and install it on your system. Of course, anonymous FTP (no username and password required) is not always available. Therefore, the URL may also contain a username and password preceding the hostname:
ftp://smith:mypass@ftp.gnomovision.com/pub/rpms/foobar-1.0-1.i386.rpm

However, entering a password where it can be seen by anyone looking at your screen is a bad idea. So try this format:
ftp://smith@ftp.gnomovision.com/pub/rpms/foobar-1.0-1.i386.rpm

RPM will prompt you for your password, and you'll be in business:
# rpm -i ftp://smith@ftp.gnomovision.com/pub/rpms/apmd-2.4-1.i386.rpm Password for smith@ftp.gnomovision.com: mypass (not echoed) #

After entering a valid password, RPM installs the package. On some systems, the FTP daemon doesn't run on the standard port 21. Normally this is done for the sake of enhanced security. Fortunately, there is a way to specify a non-standard port in a URL:
ftp://ftp.gnomovision.com:1024/pub/rpms/foobar-1.0-1.i386.rpm


40

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

This URL will direct the FTP request to port 1024. The --ftpport option is another way to specify the port. This option is discussed later, in Section 2.4.15, --ftpport : Use In FTP-based Installs .

2.2.2 A warning message you might never see
Depending on circumstances, the following message might be rare or very common. While performing an ordinary install, RPM prints a warning message:
# rpm -i cdp-0.33-100.i386.rpm warning: /etc/cdp-config saved as /etc/cdp-config.rpmorig #

What does it mean? It has to do with RPM's handling of config files. In the example above, RPM found a file (/etc/cdp-config) that didn't belong to any RPMinstalled package. Since the cdp-0.33-100 package contains a file of the same name that is to be installed in the same directory, there is a problem. RPM solves this the best way it can. It performs two steps: 1. 2. It renames the original file to cdp-config.rpmorig. It installs the new cdp-config file that came with the package.

Continuing our example, if we look in /etc, we see that this is exactly what has happened:
# ls -al /etc/cdp* -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-rw-r-1 root # root root 119 Jun 23 16:00 /etc/cdp-config 56 Jun 14 21:44 /etc/cdp-config.rpmorig

This is the best possible solution to a tricky problem. The package a config file that is known to work. After all, the original file may incompatible version of the software. However, the original file is can be studied by the system administrator, who can decide whether should be put back into service or not.

is installed with be for an older, saved so that it the original file


Section 2.3:Two handy options

41

2.3 Two handy options
There are two options to rpm -i that work so well, and are so useful, you might think they should be RPM's default behavior. They aren't, but using them only requires that you type an extra two characters:

2.3.1 Getting a bit more feedback with -v
Even though rpm -i is doing many things, it's not very exciting, is it? When performing installs, RPM is pretty quiet, unless something goes wrong. However, we can ask for a bit more output by adding -v to the command:
# rpm -iv eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm Installing eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm #

By adding -v, RPM displayed a simple status line. Using -v is a good idea, particularly if you're going to use a single command to install more than one package:
# rpm -iv *.rpm Installing eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm Installing iBCS-1.2-3.i386.rpm Installing logrotate-1.0-1.i386.rpm #

In this case, there were three .rpm files in the directory. By using a simple wildcard, it's as easy to install one package as it is to install one hundred!

2.3.2 -h: Perfect for the Impatient
Sometimes a package can be quite large. Other than watching the disk activity light flash, there's no assurance that RPM is working, and if it is, how far along it is. If you add -h, RPM will print fifty hash marks ("#") as the install proceeds:
# rpm -ih eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm ################################################## #


42

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

Once all fifty hash marks are printed, the package is completely installed. Using -v with -h results in a very nice display, particularly when installing more than one package:
# rpm -ivh *.rpm eject ################################################## iBCS ################################################## logrotate ################################################## #

2.4 Additional options to rpm -i
Normally rpm -i, perhaps with the -v and -h, is all you'll need. However, there may be times when a basic install is not going to get the job done. Fortunately, RPM has a wealth of install options to make the tough times a little easier. As with any other powerful tool, you should understand these options before putting them to use. Let's take a look at them:

2.4.1 Getting a lot more information with -vv
Sometimes it's necessary to have even more information than we can get with -v. By adding another v, we can start to see more of RPM's inner workings:
# rpm -ivv eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm D: installing eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm Installing eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm D: package: eject-1.2-2 files test = 0 D: running preinstall script (if any) D: setting file owners and groups by name (not id) D: ///usr/bin/eject owned by root (0), group root (0) mode 755 D: ///usr/man/man1/eject.1 owned by root (0), group root (0) mode 644 D: running postinstall script (if any) #

The lines starting with D: have been added by using -vv. The line ending with "files test = 0", means that RPM is actually going to install the package. If the number were non-zero, it would mean that the --test option was present, and


Section 2.4:Additional options to rpm -i

43

RPM would not actually perform the installation. For more information on using --test with rpm -i, see Section 2.4.2, --test: Perform Installation Tests Only. Continuing with the above example, we see that RPM next executes a pre-install script (if there is one), followed by the actual installation of the files in the package. There is one line for each file being installed, and that line shows the filename, ownership, group membership, and permissions (or mode) applied to the file. With larger packages, the output from -vv can get quite lengthy! Finally, RPM runs a post-install script, if one exists for the package. We'll be discussing pre- and post-install scripts in more detail in Section 2.4.10, --noscripts: Do Not Execute Pre- and Post-install Scripts. In the vast majority of cases, it will not be necessary to use -vv. It is normally used by software engineers working on RPM itself, and the output can change without notice. However, it's a handy way to gain insights into RPM's inner workings.

2.4.2 --test: Perform Installation Tests Only
There are times when it's more appropriate to take it slow and not try to install a package right away. RPM provides the --test option for that. As the names implies, it performs all the checks that RPM normally does during an install, but stops short of actually performing the steps necessary to install the package:
# rpm -i --test eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm #

Once again, there's not very much output. This is because the test succeeded; had there been a problem, the output would have been a bit more interesting. In this example, there are some problems:
# rpm -i --test rpm-2.0.11-1.i386.rpm /bin/rpm conflicts with file from rpm-2.3-1 /usr/bin/gendiff conflicts with file from rpm-2.3-1 /usr/bin/rpm2cpio conflicts with file from rpm-2.3-1 /usr/bin/rpmconvert conflicts with file from rpm-2.3-1 /usr/man/man8/rpm.8 conflicts with file from rpm-2.3-1 error: rpm-2.0.11-1.i386.rpm cannot be installed #


44

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

If you'll note the version numbers, we're trying to install an older version of RPM (2.0.11) "on top of" a newer version(2.3). RPM faithfully reported the various file conflicts and summarized with a message saying that the install would not have proceeded, even if --test had not been on the command line. The --test option will also catch dependency-related problems:
# rpm -i --test blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm failed dependencies: bother >= 3.1 is needed by blather-7.9-1 #

Here's a tip for all you script-writers out there: RPM will return a non-zero status if the --test option detects problems...

2.4.3 --replacepkgs: Install the Package Even If Already Installed
The --replacepkgs option is used to force RPM to install a package that it believes to be installed already. This option is normally used if the installed package has been damaged somehow and needs to be fixed up. To see how the --replacepkgs option works, let's first install some software:
# rpm -iv cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm #

OK, now that we have cdp-0.33-2 installed, let's see what happens if we try to install the same version "on top of" itself:
# rpm -iv cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm package cdp-0.33-2 is already installed error: cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm cannot be installed #

That didn't go very well. Let's see what adding --replacepkgs will do :
# rpm -iv --replacepkgs cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm


Section 2.4:Additional options to rpm -i

45

Installing cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm #

Much better. The original package was replaced by a new copy of itself.

2.4.4 --replacefiles: Install the Package Even If It Replaces Another Package's Files
While the --replacepkgs option permitted a package to be installed "on top of" itself, --replacefiles is used to allow a package to overwrite files belonging to a different package. Sounds strange? Let's go over it in a bit more detail. One thing that sets RPM apart from many other package managers is that it keeps track of all the files it installs in a database. Each file's database entry contains a variety of information about the file, including a means of summarizing the file's contents. 2By using these summaries, known as MD5 checksums, RPM can determine if a particular file is going to be replaced by a file with the same name, but different contents. Here's an example: Package "A" installs a file (we'll call it /bin/foo.bar). Once Package A is installed, foo.bar resides happily in the /bin directory. In the RPM database, there is an entry for /bin/foo.bar, including the file's MD5 checksum. However, there is a another package, "B". Package B also has a file called foo.bar that it wants to install in /bin. There can't be two files in the same directory with the same name. The files are different; their MD5 checksums do not match. What happens if Package B is installed? Let's find out. Here, we've installed a package:
# rpm -iv cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm #

OK, no problem there. But we have another package to install. In this case, it is a new release of the cdp package. It should be noted that RPM's detection of file conflicts does not depend on the two packages being related. It is strictly based on the name of
2 We'll get more into this aspect of RPM in Section 6.1, rpm -V -- What Does it Do? when we discuss rpm -V.


46

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

the file, the directory in which it resides, and the file's MD5 checksum. Here's what happens when we try to install the package:
# rpm -iv cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm /usr/bin/cdp conflicts with file from cdp-0.33-2 error: cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm cannot be installed #

What's happening? The package cdp-0.33-2 has a file, /usr/bin/cdp, that it installed. Sure enough, there it is. Let's highlight the size and creation date of the file for future reference:
# ls -al /usr/bin/cdp -rwxr-xr-x 1 root # root 34460 Feb 25 14:27 /usr/bin/cdp

The package we just tried to install, cdp-0.33-3 (note the different release), also installs a file cdp in /usr/bin. Since there is a conflict, that means that the two package's cdp files must be different -- their checksums don't match. Because of this, RPM won't let the second package install. But with --replacefiles, we can force RPM to let the /usr/bin/cdp from cdp-0.33-3 replace the /usr/bin/cdp from cdp-0.33-2:
# rpm -iv --replacefiles cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm #

Taking a closer look at /usr/bin/cdp, we find that they certainly are different, both in size and creation date:
# ls -al /usr/bin/cdp -rwxr-xr-x 1 root # root 34444 Apr 24 22:37 /usr/bin/cdp


Section 2.4:Additional options to rpm -i

47

File conflicts should be a relatively rare occurrence. They only happen when two packages attempt to install files with the same name but different contents. There are two possible reasons for this to happen: · Installing a newer version of a package without erasing the older version. A newer version of a package is a wonderful source of file conflicts against older versions -- the filenames remain the same, but the contents change. We used it in our example because it's an easy way to show what happens when there are file conflicts. However, it is usually a bad idea when it comes to doing this as a way to upgrade packages. RPM has a special option for this (rpm -U) that is discussed in Chapter 4, Using RPM to Upgrade Packages. Installing two unrelated packages that each install a file with the same name. This may happen because of poor package design (hence the file residing in more than one package), or a lack of coordination between the people building the packages.

·

--replacefiles and Config Files What happens if a conflicting file is a config file that you've sweated over and worked on until it's just right? Will issuing a --replacefiles on a package with a conflicting config file blow all your changes away? No! RPM won't cook your goose.
3

It will save any changes you've made, to a config file called .rpmsave. Let's give it a try: As system administrator, you want to make sure your new users have a rich environment the first time they log in. So you've come up with a really nifty .bashrc file that will be executed whenever they log in. Knowing that everyone will enjoy your wonderful .bashrc file, you place it in /etc/skel. That way, every time a new account is created, your .bashrc will be copied into the new user's login directory. Not realizing that the .bashrc file you modified in /etc/skel is listed as a config file in a package called (strangely enough) etcskel, you decide to experiment with RPM using the etcskel package. First you try to install it:
# rpm -iv etcskel-1.0-100.i386.rpm 3 You'll have to do that yourself!


48

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

etcskel /etc/skel/.bashrc conflicts with file from etcskel-1.0-3 error: etcskel-1.0-100.i386.rpm cannot be installed #

Hmmm. That didn't work. Wait a minute! I can add --replacefiles to the command and it should install just fine:
# rpm -iv --replacefiles etcskel-1.0-100.i386.rpm Installing etcskel-1.0-100.i386.rpm warning: /etc/skel/.bashrc saved as /etc/skel/.bashrc.rpmsave #

Wait a minute... That's my customized .bashrc! Was it really saved?
# ls -al /etc/skel/ total 8 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root -rw-r--r-1 root root -rw-r--r-1 root root -rw-r--r-1 root root -rw-r--r-1 root root -rw-r--r-1 root root drwxr-xr-x 2 root root lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root # cat /etc/skel/.bashrc.rpmsave # .bashrc # User specific aliases and functions # Modified by the sysadmin uptime # Source global definitions if [ -f /etc/bashrc ]; then . /etc/bashrc fi # 186 1126 24 220 169 159 1024 9 Oct Aug Jul Aug Jun Jun May Jun 12 23 13 23 17 17 13 17 1994 1995 1994 1995 20:02 20:46 13:18 20:46 .Xclients .Xdefaults .bash_logout .bash_profile .bashrc .bashrc.rpmsave .xfm .xsession -> .Xclients

Whew! You heave a sigh of relief, and study the new .bashrc to see if the changes need to be integrated into your customized version.


Section 2.4:Additional options to rpm -i

49

--replacefiles Can Mean Trouble Down the Road While --replacefiles can make today's difficult install go away, it can mean big headaches in the future. When the time comes for erasing the packages involved in a file conflict, bad things can happen. What bad things? Well, files can be deleted. Here's how, in three easy steps: 1. Two packages are installed. When the second package is installed, there is a conflict with a file installed by the first package. Therefore, the --replacefiles option is used to force RPM to replace the conflicting file with the one from the second package. At some point in the future, the second package is erased. The conflicting file is gone!

2. 3.

Let's look at an example. First, we install a new package. Next, we take a look at a file it installed, noting the size and creation date.
# rpm -iv cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm # ls -al /usr/bin/cdp -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root #

34460 Feb 25 14:27 /usr/bin/cdp

Next, we try to install a newer release of the same package. It fails:
# rpm -iv cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm /usr/bin/cdp conflicts with file from cdp-0.33-2 error: cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm cannot be installed #

So, we use --replacefiles to convince the newer package to install. We note that the newer package installed a file on top of the file originally installed:
# rpm -iv --replacefiles cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm # ls -al /usr/bin/cdp -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 34444 Apr 24 22:37 /usr/bin/cdp


50

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

#

The original cdp file, 34,460 bytes long, and dated February 25th, has been replaced with a file with the same name, but 34,444 bytes long from the 24th of April. The original file is long gone. Next, we erased the package we just installed. 4Finally, we tried to find the file:
# rpm -e cdp-0.33-3 # ls -al /usr/bin/cdp ls: /usr/bin/cdp: No such file or directory #

The file is gone. Why is this? The reason is that /usr/bin/cdp from the first package was replaced when the second package was installed using the --replacefiles option. Then, when the second package was erased, the /usr/bin/cdp file was removed, since it belonged to the second package. If the first package had been erased first, there would have been no problem, since RPM would have realized that the first package's file had already been deleted, and would have left the file in place. The only problem with this state of affairs is that the first package is still installed, except for /usr/bin/cdp. So now there's a partially installed package on the system. What to do? Perhaps it's time to exercise your new-found knowledge by issuing an rpm -i --replacepkgs command to fix up the first package...

2.4.5 --nodeps: Do Not Check Dependencies Before Installing Package
One day it'll happen. You'll be installing a new package, when suddenly, the install bombs:
# rpm -i blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm failed dependencies: bother >= 3.1 is needed by blather-7.9-1 # 4 For more information on erasing packages with rpm -e, see Chapter 3, Using RPM to Erase Packages.


Section 2.4:Additional options to rpm -i

51

What happened? The problem is that the package you're installing requires another package to be installed in order for it to work properly. In our example, the blather package won't work properly unless the bother package (and more specifically, bother version 3.1 or later) is installed. Since our system doesn't have an appropriate version of bother installed at all, RPM aborted the installation of blather. Now, 99 times out of 100, this exactly the right thing for RPM to do. After all, if the package doesn't have everything it needs to work properly, why try to install it? Well, as with everything else in life, there are exceptions to the rule. And that is why there is a --nodeps option. Adding the --nodeps options to an install command directs RPM to ignore any dependency-related problems and to complete the package installation. Going back to our example above, let's add the --nodeps option to the command line and see what happens:
# rpm -i --nodeps blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm #

The package was installed without a peep. Whether it will work properly is another matter, but it is installed. In general, it's not a good idea to use --nodeps to get around dependency problems. The package builders included the dependency requirements for a reason, and it's best not to second-guess them.

2.4.6 --force: The Big Hammer
Adding --force to an install command is a way of saying "Install it anyway!" In essence, it adds --replacepkgs and --replacefiles to the command. Like a big hammer, --force is an irresistible force 5that makes things happen. In fact, the only thing that will prevent a --force'ed install from proceeding is a dependency conflict. And like a big hammer, it pays to fully understand why you need to use --force before actually using it.
5 No pun intended.


52

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

2.4.7 --excludedocs: Do Not Install Documentation For This Package
RPM has a number of good features. One of them is the fact that RPM classifies the files it installs into one of three categories: 1. 2. 3. Config files. Files containing documentation. All other files.

RPM uses the --excludedocs option to prevent files classified as documentation from being installed. In the following example, we know that the package contains documentation: specifically, the man page, /usr/man/man1/cdp.1. Let's see how --excludedocs keeps it from being installed:
# rpm -iv --excludedocs cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm # ls -al /usr/man/man1/cdp.1 ls: /usr/man/man1/cdp.1: No such file or directory #

The primary reason to use --excludedocs is to save on disk space. The savings can be sizeable. For example, on an RPM-installed Linux system, there can be over 5,000 documentation files, using nearly 50 megabytes. If you like, you can make --excludedocs the default for all installs. To do this, simply add the following line to /etc/rpmrc, .rpmrc in your login directory, or the file specified with the --rcfile (which is discussed in Section 2.4.12, --rcfile : Use As An Alternate rpmrc File ) option: excludedocs: 1 After that, every time an rpm -i command is run, it will not install any documentation files. 6
6 For more information on rpmrc files, refer to Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


Section 2.4:Additional options to rpm -i

53

2.4.8 --includedocs: Install Documentation For This Package
As the name implies, --includedocs directs RPM to install any files marked as being documentation. This option is normally not required, unless the rpmrc file entry "excludedocs: 1" is included in the referenced rpmrc file. Here's an example. Note that in this example, /etc/rpmrc contains "excludedocs: 1", which directs RPM not to install documentation files:
# ls /usr/man/man1/cdp.1 ls: /usr/man/man1/cdp.1: No such file or directory # rpm -iv cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm # ls /usr/man/man1/cdp.1 ls: /usr/man/man1/cdp.1: No such file or directory #

Here we've checked to make sure that the cdp man page did not previously exist on the system. Then after installing the cdp package, we find that the "excludedocs: 1" in /etc/rpmrc did its job: the man page wasn't installed. Let's try it again, this time adding the --includedocs option:
# ls /usr/man/man1/cdp.1 ls: /usr/man/man1/cdp.1: No such file or directory # rpm -iv --includedocs cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-3.i386.rpm # ls /usr/man/man1/cdp.1 -rw-r--r-1 root root 4550 Apr 24 22:37 /usr/man/man1/cdp.1 #

The --includedocs option overrode the rpmrc file's "excludedocs: try, causing RPM to install the documentation file.

1" en-

2.4.9 --prefix : Relocate the package to , if possible
Some packages give the person installing them flexibility in determining where on their system they should be installed. These are known as relocatable packages. A


54

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

relocatable package differs from a package that cannot be relocated, in only one way -- the definition of a default prefix. Because of this, it takes a bit of additional effort to determine if a package is relocatable. But here's an RPM command that can be used to find out: 7
rpm -qp --queryformat "%{defaultprefix}\n"

Just replace with the name of the package file you want to check out. If the package is not relocatable, you'll only see the word (none). If, on the other hand, the command displays a path, that means the package is relocatable. Unless specified otherwise, every file in the package will be installed somewhere below the path specified by the default prefix. What if you want to specify otherwise? Easy: just use the --prefix option. Let's give it a try:
# rpm -qp --queryformat "%{defaultprefix}\n" cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm /usr/local # rpm -i --prefix /tmp/test cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm #

Here we've used our magic query command to determine that the cdplayer package is relocatable. It normally installs below /usr/local, but we wanted to move it around. By adding the --prefix option, we were able to make the package install in /tmp/test. If we take a look there, we'll see that RPM created all the necessary directories to hold the package's files:
# ls -lR /tmp/test/ total 2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root drwxr-xr-x 3 root /tmp/test/bin: total 41 1 root -rwxr-xr-x lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root root 1024 Dec 16 13:21 bin/ 1024 Dec 16 13:21 man/

root root

40739 Oct 14 20:25 cdp* 17 Dec 16 13:21 cdplay -> /tmp/test/bin/cdp*

7 We discuss RPM's query commands in Chapter 5, Getting Information About Packages.


Section 2.4:Additional options to rpm -i

55

/tmp/test/man: total 1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root /tmp/test/man/man1: total 5 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root #

root

1024 Dec 16 13:21 man1/

root

4550 Oct 14 20:25 cdp.1*

2.4.10 --noscripts: Do Not Execute Pre- and Post-install Scripts
Before we talk about the --noscripts option, we need to cover a bit of background. In Section 2.4.1, Getting a lot more information with -vv, we saw some output from an install using the -vv option. As can be seen, there are two lines that mention pre-install and post-install scripts. When some packages are installed, they may require that certain programs be executed before, after, or before and after the package's files are copied to disk. 8 The --noscripts option prevents these scripts from being executed during an install. This is a very dangerous thing to do! The --noscripts option is really meant for package builders to use during the development of their packages. By preventing the pre- and post-install scripts from running, a package builder can keep a buggy package from bringing down their development system. Once the bugs are found and eliminated, the --noscripts option is no longer necessary.

2.4.11 --percent: Not Meant for Human Consumption
An option that will probably never be very popular is --percent. This option is meant to be used by programs that interact with the user, perhaps presenting a graphical user interface for RPM. When the --percent option is used, RPM displays a series of numbers. Each number is a percentage that indicates how far along the install is. When the number reaches 100%, the installation is complete.
8 It's possible to use RPM's query command to see if a package has pre- or post-install scripts. See --scripts -- Show Scripts Associated With a Package in Section 5.2.2 for more information.


56

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

# rpm -i --percent iBCS-1.2-3.i386.rpm %f iBCS:1.2:3 %% 0.002140 %% 1.492386 %% 5.296632 %% 9.310026 %% 15.271010 %% 26.217846 %% 31.216000 %% 100.000000 %% 100.000000 #

The list of percentages will vary depending on the number of files in the package, but every package ends at 100% when completely installed.

2.4.12 --rcfile : Use As An Alternate rpmrc File
The --rcfile option is used to specify a file containing default settings for RPM. Normally, this option is not needed. By default, RPM uses /etc/rpmrc and a file named .rpmrc located in your login directory. This option would be used if there was a need to switch between several sets of RPM defaults. Software developers and package builders will normally be the only people using the --rcfile option. For more information on rpmrc files, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.

2.4.13 --root : Use As An Alternate Root
Adding --root to an install command forces RPM to assume that the directory specified by is actually the "root" directory. The --root option affects every aspect of the install process, so pre- and post-install scripts are run with as their root directory (using chroot(2), if you must know). In addition, RPM expects its database to reside in the directory specified by the dbpath rpmrc file entry, relative to . 9
9 For more information on rpmrc file entries, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


Section 2.4:Additional options to rpm -i

57

Normally this option is only used during an initial system install, or when a system has been booted off a "rescue disk" and some packages need to be re-installed.

2.4.14 --dbpath : Use To Find RPM Database
In order for RPM to do its handiwork, it needs access to an RPM database. Normally, this database exists in the directory specified by the rpmrc file entry, dbpath. By default, dbpath is set to /var/lib/rpm. Although the dbpath entry can be modified in the appropriate rpmrc file, the --dbpath option is probably a better choice when the database path needs to be changed temporarily. An example of a time the --dbpath option would come in handy is when it's necessary to examine an RPM database copied from another system. Granted, it's not a common occurrence, but it's difficult to handle any other way.

2.4.15 --ftpport : Use In FTP-based Installs
Back in Section 2.2.1, URLs -- Another Way to Specify Package Files we showed how RPM can access package files by the use of a URL. We also mentioned that some systems may not use the standard FTP port. In those cases, it's necessary to give RPM the proper port number to use. As we mentioned above, one approach is to embed the port number in the URL itself. Another approach is to use the --ftpport option. RPM will access the desired port when this option, along with the port number, is added to the command line. In cases where the desired port seldom changes, it may be entered in an rpmrc file by using the ftpport entry. 10

2.4.16 --ftpproxy : Use As Proxy In FTP-based Installs
Many companies and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) employ various methods to protect their network connections against misuse. One of these methods is to use
10 The use of rpmrc files is described in Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


58

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages

a system that will process all FTP requests on behalf of the other systems on the company or ISP network. By having a single computer act as a proxy for the other systems, it serves to protect the other systems against any FTP-related misuse. When RPM is employed on a network with an FTP proxy system, it will be necessary for RPM to direct all its FTP requests to the FTP proxy. RPM will send its FTP requests to the specified proxy system when the --ftpproxy option, along with the proxy hostname, is added to the command line. In cases where the proxy host seldom changes, it may be entered in an rpmrc file by using the ftpproxy entry. 11

2.4.17 --ignorearch: Do Not Verify Package Architecture
When a package file is created, RPM specifies the architecture, or type of computer hardware, for which the package was created. This is a good thing, as the architecture is one of the main factors in determining whether a package written for one computer is going to be compatible with another computer. When a package is installed, RPM uses the arch_compat rpmrc entries in order to determine what are normally considered compatible architectures. Unless you're porting RPM to a new architecture, you shouldn't make any changes to these entries. 12While RPM attempts to make the right decisions regarding package compatibility, there are times when it errs on the side of conservatism. In those cases, it's necessary to override RPM's decision. The --ignorearch option is used in those cases. When added to the command line, RPM will not perform any architecture-related checking. Unless you really know what you're doing, you should never use --ignorearch!
11 The use of rpmrc files is described in Appendix B, The rpmrc File. 12 If you are porting RPM, you'll find more on arch_compat in xxx_compat -- Define Compatible Architectures in Section 19.3.1.


Section 2.4:Additional options to rpm -i

59

2.4.18 --ignoreos: Do Not Verify Package Operating System
When a package file is created, RPM specifies the operating system for which the package was created. This is a good thing as the operating system is one of the main factors in determining whether a package written for one computer is going to be compatible with another computer. When a package is installed, RPM uses the os_compat rpmrc entries to determine what are normally considered compatible operating systems. Unless you're porting RPM to a new operating system, you shouldn't make any changes to these entries. 13While RPM attempts to make the right decisions regarding package compatibility, there are times when it errs on the side of conservatism. In those cases, it's necessary to override RPM's decision. The --ignoreos option is used in those cases. When added to the command line, RPM will not perform any operating system-related checking. Unless you really know what you're doing, you should never use --ignoreos!
13 If you are porting RPM, you'll find more on os_compat in xxx_compat -- Define Compatible Architectures in Section 19.3.1.


60

Chapter 2:Using RPM to Install Packages


Using RPM to Erase Packages

61

3 Using RPM to Erase Packages
Table 3­1 rpm -e Command Syntax

rpm -e (or --erase) options pkg1 ... pkgN Parameters pkg1 ... pkgN Erase-specific Options --test Perform erase tests only One or more installed packages Page Section 3.3.1, --test -- Go Through the Process of Erasing the Package, But Do Not Erase It Section 3.3.3, --noscripts -- Do Not Execute Pre- and Post-uninstall Scripts Section 3.3.2, --nodeps: Do Not Check Dependencies Before Erasing Package Page Section 3.2.1, Getting More Information With -vv Section 3.3.5, --root -- Use As the Root

--noscripts

Do not execute pre- and post-uninstall scripts

--nodeps

Do not check dependencies

General Options -vv Display debugging information Set alternate root to

--root


62

Chapter 3:Using RPM to Erase Packages

--rcfile

Set alternate rpmrc file to Section 3.3.4, --rcfile -- Read For RPM Defaults Use to find the RPM database Section 3.3.6, --dbpath : Use To Find RPM Database

--dbpath

3.1 rpm -e -- What Does it Do?
The rpm -e command (--erase is equivalent) removes, or erases, one or more packages from the system. RPM performs a series of steps whenever it erases a package: · · · · · · It checks the RPM database to make sure that no other packages depend on the package being erased. It executes a pre-uninstall script (if one exists). It checks to see if any of the package's config files have been modified. If so, it saves copies of them. It reviews the RPM database to find every file listed as being part of the package, and if they do not belong to another package, deletes them. It executes a post-uninstall script (if one exists). It removes all traces of the package (and the files belonging to it) from the RPM database.

That's quite a bit of activity for a single command. No wonder RPM can be such a time-saver!

3.2 Erasing a Package
The most basic erase command is:
# rpm -e eject


Section 3.2:Erasing a Package

63

#

In this case, the eject package was erased. There isn't much in the way of feedback, is there? Could we get more if we add -v?
# rpm -ev eject #

Still nothing. However, there's another option that can be counted on to give a wealth of information. Let's give it a try:

3.2.1 Getting More Information With -vv
By adding -vv to the command line, we can often get a better feel for what's going on inside RPM. The -vv option was really meant for the RPM developers, and its output may change, but it is a great way to gain insight into RPM's inner workings. Let's try it with rpm -e:
# rpm -evv eject D: uninstalling record number 286040 D: running preuninstall script (if any) D: removing files test = 0 D: /usr/man/man1/eject.1 - removing D: /usr/bin/eject - removing D: running postuninstall script (if any) D: removing database entry D: removing name index D: removing group index D: removing file index for /usr/bin/eject D: removing file index for /usr/man/man1/eject.1 #

Although -v had no effect on RPM's output, -vv gave us a torrent of output. But what does it tell us? First, RPM displays the package's record number. The number is normally of use only to people that work on RPM's database code. Next, RPM executes a "pre-uninstall" script, if one exists. This script can execute any commands required to remove the package before any files are actually deleted.


64

Chapter 3:Using RPM to Erase Packages

The "files test = 0" line indicates that RPM is to actually erase the package. If the number had been non-zero, RPM would only be performing a test of the package erasure. This happens when the --test option is used. Refer to Section 3.3.1, --test -- Go Through the Process of Erasing the Package, But Do Not Erase It for more information on the use of the --test option with rpm -e. The next two lines log the actual removal of the files comprising the package. Packages with many files can result in a lot of output when using -vv! Next, RPM executes a "post-uninstall" script, if one exists. Like the pre-uninstall script, this script is used to perform any processing required to cleanly erase the package. Unlike the pre-uninstall script, however, the post-uninstall script runs after all the package's files have been removed. Finally, the last five lines show the process RPM uses to remove every trace of the package from its database. From the messages, we can see that the database contains some per-package data, followed by information on every file installed by the package.

3.3 Additional Options
If you're interested in a complex command with lots of options, rpm -e is not the place to look. There just aren't that many different ways to erase a package! But there are a few options you should know about.

3.3.1 --test -- Go Through the Process of Erasing the Package, But Do Not Erase It
If you're a bit gun-shy about erasing a package, you can use the --test option first to see what rpm -e would do:
# rpm -e --test bother removing these packages would break dependencies: bother >= 3.1 is needed by blather-7.9-1 #


Section 3.3:Additional Options

65

It's pretty easy to see that the blather package wouldn't work very well if bother were erased. To be fair, however, RPM wouldn't have erased the package in this example unless we used the --nodeps option, which we'll discuss shortly. However, if there are no problems erasing the package, you won't see very much:
# rpm -e --test eject #

We know, based on previous experience, that -v doesn't give us any additional output with rpm -e. However, we do know that -vv works wonders. Let's see what it has to say:
# rpm -evv --test eject D: uninstalling record number 286040 D: running preuninstall script (if any) D: would remove files test = 1 D: /usr/man/man1/eject.1 - would remove D: /usr/bin/eject - would remove D: running postuninstall script (if any) D: would remove database entry #

As you can see, the output is similar to that of a regular erase command using the -vv option, with the following exceptions: · The "would remove files test = 1" line ends with a non-zero number. This is because --test has been added. If the command hadn't included --test, the number would have been 0, and the package would have been erased. There is a line for each file that RPM would have removed, each one ending with "would remove" instead of "removing". There is only one line at the end, stating: "would remove database entry", versus the multi-line output showing the cleanup of the RPM database during an actual erase.

· ·


66

Chapter 3:Using RPM to Erase Packages

By using --test in conjunction with -vv, it's easy to see exactly what RPM would do during an actual erase.

3.3.2 --nodeps: Do Not Check Dependencies Before Erasing Package
It's likely that one day while erasing a package, you'll see something like this:
# rpm -e bother removing these packages would break dependencies: bother >= 3.1 is needed by blather-7.9-1 #

What happened? The problem is that one or more of the packages installed on your system require the package you're trying to erase. Without it, they won't work properly. In our example, the blather package won't work properly unless the bother package (and more specifically, bother version 3.1 or later) is installed. Since we're trying to erase bother, RPM aborted the erasure. Now, 99 times out of 100, this is exactly the right thing for RPM to do. After all, if the package is needed by other packages, why try to erase it? As with everything else in life, there are exceptions to the rule. And that is why there is a --nodeps option. Adding the --nodeps options to an erase command directs RPM to ignore any dependency-related problems, and to erase the package. Going back to our example above, let's add the --nodeps option to the command line and see what happens:
# rpm -e --nodeps bother #

The package was erased without a peep. Whether the blather package will work properly is another matter. In general, it's not a good idea to use --nodeps to get around dependency problems. The package builders included the dependency requirements for a reason, and it's best not to second-guess them.


Section 3.3:Additional Options

67

3.3.3 --noscripts -- Do Not Execute Pre- and Post-uninstall Scripts
In Section 3.2.1, Getting More what RPM was actually doing two scripts, a pre-uninstall and required during the process of Information With -vv, we used the -vv option to see when it erased a package. We noted that there were a post-uninstall, that were used to execute commands erasing a package.

The --noscripts option prevents these scripts from being executed during an erase. This is a very dangerous thing to do! The --noscripts option is really meant for package builders to use during the development of their packages. By preventing the pre- and post-uninstall scripts from running, a package builder can keep a buggy package from bringing down their development system. Once the bugs are found and eliminated, there's very little need to prevent these scripts from running; in fact, doing so can cause problems!

3.3.4 --rcfile -- Read For RPM Defaults
The --rcfile option is used to specify a file containing default settings for RPM. Normally, this option is not needed. By default, RPM uses /etc/rpmrc and a file named .rpmrc located in your login directory. This option would be used if there was a need to switch between several sets of RPM defaults. Software developers and package builders will normally be the only people using the --rcfile option. For more information on rpmrc files, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.

3.3.5 --root -- Use As the Root
Adding --root to an install command forces RPM to assume that the directory specified by is actually the "root" directory. The --root option affects every aspect of the install process, so pre- and post-install scripts are run with as their root directory (using chroot(2), if you must know). In addition, RPM expects its database to reside in the directory specified by the dbpath rpmrc file entry, relative to . 1
1 For more information on rpmrc file entries, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


68

Chapter 3:Using RPM to Erase Packages

Normally this option is only used during an initial system install, or when a system has been booted off a "rescue disk" and some packages need to be re-installed.

3.3.6 --dbpath : Use To Find RPM Database
In order for RPM to do its handiwork, it needs access to an RPM database. Normally, this database exists in the directory specified by the rpmrc file entry, dbpath. By default, dbpath is set to /var/lib/rpm. Although the dbpath entry can be modified in the appropriate rpmrc file, the --dbpath option is probably a better choice when the database path needs to be changed temporarily. An example of a time the --dbpath option would come in handy is when it's necessary to examine an RPM database copied from another system. Granted, it's not a common occurrence, but it's difficult to handle any other way.

3.4 rpm -e and Config files
If you've made changes to a configuration file that was originally installed by RPM, your changes won't be lost if you erase the package. Say, for example, that we've made changes to /etc/skel/.bashrc (a config file), which was installed as part of the etcskel package. Later, we remove etcskel:
# rpm -e etcskel #

But if we take a look in /etc/skel, look what's there:
# ls -al total 5 drwxr-xr-x drwxr-xr-x -rw-r--r-drwxr-xr-x #

3 8 1 2

root root root root

root root root root

1024 2048 152 1024

Jun Jun Jun May

17 17 17 13

22:01 19:01 21:54 13:18

. .. .bashrc.rpmsave .xfm


Section 3.5:Watch Out!

69

Sure enough: .bashrc.rpmsave is a copy of your modified .bashrc file! Remember, however, that this feature only works with config files. Not sure how to determine which files RPM thinks are config files? Chapter 5, Getting Information About Packages will show you how.

3.5 Watch Out!
RPM takes most of the work out of removing software from your system, and that's great. As with everything else in life, however, there's a downside. RPM also makes it easy to erase packages that are critical to your system's continued operation. Here are some examples of packages not to erase: · · RPM: RPM will happily uninstall itself. No problem -- you'll just re-install it with rpm -i... Oops! Bash: The Bourne-again Shell may not be the shell you use, but certain parts of many Linux systems (like the scripts executed during system startup and shutdown) use /bin/sh, which is a symbolic link to /bin/bash. No /bin/bash, no /bin/sh. No /bin/sh, no system!

In many cases, RPM's dependency processing will prevent inadvertent erasures from causing massive problems. However, if you're not sure, use rpm -q to get more information about the package you'd like to erase. 2
2 See Chapter 5, Getting Information About Packages for more information on rpm -q.


70

Chapter 3:Using RPM to Erase Packages


Using RPM to Upgrade Packages

71

4 Using RPM to Upgrade Packages
Table 4­1 rpm -U Command Syntax

rpm -U (or --upgrade)options file1.rpm ... fileN.rpm Parameters file1.rpm ... fileN.rpm -h (or --hash) --oldpackage One or more RPM package files (URLs OK) Page Section 2.3.2, -h: Perfect for the Impatient Section 4.3.1, --oldpackage: Upgrade To An Older Version Section 2.4.2, --test: Perform Installation Tests Only Section 2.4.7, --excludedocs: Do Not Install Documentation For This Package Section 2.4.8, --includedocs: Install Documentation For This Package

Upgrade-specific Options Print hash marks ("#") during upgrade1 Permit "upgrading" to an older package

--test

Perform upgrade tests only1 Do not install documentation1

--excludedocs

--includedocs

Install documentation1


72

Chapter 4:Using RPM to Upgrade Packages

--replacepkgs

Replace a package with a new copy of itself1

Section 2.4.3, --replacepkgs: Install the Package Even If Already Installed Section 2.4.4, --replacefiles: Install the Package Even If It Replaces Another Package's Files Section 4.3.2, --force: The Big Hammer Section 2.4.11, --percent: Not Meant for Human Consumption Section 4.3.3, --noscripts: Do Not Execute Install and Uninstall Scripts Section 2.4.9, --prefix : Relocate the package to , if possible Section 2.4.17, --ignorearch: Do Not Verify Package Architecture Section 2.4.18, --ignoreos: Do Not Verify Package Operating System

--replacefiles

Replace files owned by another package1

--force --percent

Ignore package and file conflicts Print percentages during upgrade1 Do not execute pre- and post-install scripts

--noscripts

--prefix

Relocate package to if possible1

--ignorearch

Do not verify package architecture1

--ignoreos

Do not verify package operating system1


Using RPM to Upgrade Packages

73

--nodeps

Do not check dependencies1

Section 2.4.5, --nodeps: Do Not Check Dependencies Before Installing Package Section 2.4.16, --ftpproxy : Use As Proxy In FTP-based Installs Section 2.4.15, --ftpport : Use In FTP-based Installs Page Section 2.3.1, Getting a bit more feedback with -v Section 2.4.1, Getting a lot more information with -vv Section 2.4.13, --root : Use As An Alternate Root

--ftpproxy

Use as the FTP proxy1

--ftpport

Use as the FTP port1

General Options -v -vv Display additional information1 Display debugging information1 Set alternate root to 1

--root


74

Chapter 4:Using RPM to Upgrade Packages

--rcfile

Set alternate rpmrc file to Section 2.4.12, 1 --rcfile : Use As An Alternate rpmrc File Use to find the RPM database 1 Section 2.4.14, --dbpath : Use To Find RPM Database

--dbpath

4.1 rpm -U -- What Does it Do?
If there was one RPM command that could win over friends, it would be RPM's upgrade command. After all, anyone who has ever tried to install a newer version of any software knows what a traumatic experience it can be. With RPM, though, this process is reduced to a single command: rpm -U. The rpm -U command (--upgrade is equivalent) performs two distinct operations: 1. 2. Installs the desired package. Erases all older versions of the package, if any exist.

If it sounds to you like rpm -U is nothing more than an rpm -i command (see Chapter 2, Using RPM to Install Packages) followed by the appropriate number of rpm -e commands, (see Chapter 3, Using RPM to Erase Packages) you'd be exactly right. In fact, we'll be referring back to those chapters as we discuss rpm -U, so if you haven't skimmed those chapters yet, you might want to do that now. While some people might think it's a "cheap shot" to claim that RPM performs an upgrade when in fact it's just doing the equivalent of a couple of other commands, in fact, it's a very smart thing to do. By carefully crafting RPM's package installation and erasure commands to do the work required during an upgrade, it makes RPM
1 This option behaves identically to the same option used with rpm -i. Please see Chapter 2, Using RPM to Install Packages for more information on this option.


Section 4.1:rpm -U -- What Does it Do?

75

more tolerant of misuse by preserving important files even if an upgrade isn't being done. If RPM had been written with a very "smart" upgrade command, and the install and erase commands couldn't handle upgrade situations at all, installing a package could overwrite a modified configuration file. Likewise, erasing a package would also mean that config files could be erased. Not a good situation! However, RPM's approach to upgrades makes it possible to handle even the most tricky situation -- having multiple versions of a package install simultaneously.

4.1.1 Config file magic
While the rpm -i and rpm -e commands each do their part to keep config files straight, it is with rpm -U that the full power of RPM's config file handling shows through. There are no less than six different scenarios that RPM takes into account when handling config files. In order to make the appropriate decisions, RPM needs information. The information used to decide how to handle config files is a set of three large numbers known as MD5 checksums. An MD5 checksum is produced when a file is used as the input to a complex series of mathematical operations. The resulting checksum has a unique property, in that any change to the file's contents will result in a change to the checksum of that file. 2Therefore, MD5 checksums are a powerful tool for quickly determining whether two different files have the same contents or not. In the previous paragraph, we stated that RPM uses three different MD5 checksums to determine what should be done with a config file. The three checksums are: 1. 2. 3. The MD5 checksum of the file when it was originally installed. We'll call this the original file. The MD5 checksum of the file as it exists at upgrade time. We'll call this the current file. The MD5 checksum of the corresponding file in the new package. We'll call this the new file.

2 Actually, there's a one in 2128 chance a change will go undetected, but for all practical purposes, it's as close to perfect as we can get.


76

Chapter 4:Using RPM to Upgrade Packages

Let's take a look at the various combinations of checksums, see what RPM will do because of them, and discuss why. In the following examples, we'll use the letters X, Y, and Z in place of lengthy MD5 checksums. Original file = X, Current file = X, New file = X In this case, the file originally installed was never modified. 3The file in the new version of the package is identical to the file on disk. In this case, RPM installs the new file, overwriting the original. You may be wondering why go to the trouble of installing the new file if it's just the same as the existing one. The reason is that aspects of the file other than its name and contents might have changed. The file's ownership, for example, might be different in the new version. Original file = X, Current file = X, New file = Y The original file has not been modified, but the file in the new package is different. Perhaps the difference represents a bug-fix, or a new feature. It makes no difference to RPM. In this case, RPM installs the new file, overwriting the original. This makes sense. If it didn't, RPM would never permit newer, modified versions of software to be installed! The original file is not saved, since it had not been changed. A lack of changes here means that no site-specific modifications were made to the file. Original file = X, Current file = Y, New file = X Here we have a file that was changed at some point. However, the new file is identical to the existing file prior to the local modifications. In this case, RPM takes the viewpoint that since the original file and the new file are identical, the modifications made to the original version must still be valid for the new version. It leaves the existing, modified file in place.
3 Or, as some sticklers for detail may note, it may have been modified, and subsequently those modifications were undone.


Section 4.1:rpm -U -- What Does it Do?

77

Original file = X, Current file = Y, New file = Y At some point the original file was modified, and those modifications happen to make the file identical to the new file. Perhaps the modification was made to fix a security problem, and the new version of the file has the same fix applied to it. In this case, RPM installs the new version, overwriting the modified original. The same philosophy used in the first scenario applies here -- although the file has not changed, perhaps some other aspect of the file has, so the new version is installed. Original file = X, Current file = Y, New file = Z Here the original file was modified at some point. The new file is different from both the original and the modified versions of the original file. RPM is not able to analyze the contents of the files, and determine what is going on. In this instance, it takes the best possible approach. The new file is known to work properly with the rest of the software in the new package -- at least the people building the new package should have insured that it does. The modified original file is an unknown: it might work with the new package, it might not. So RPM installs the new file. BUT... The existing file was definitely modified. Someone made an effort to change the file, for some reason. Perhaps the information contained in the file is still of use. Therefore, RPM saves the modified file, naming it .rpmsave, and prints a warning, so the user knows what happened:
warning: /etc/skel/.bashrc saved as /etc/skel/.bashrc.rpmsave

These five scenarios cover just about every possible circumstance, save one. The missing scenario? Original file = none, Current file = ??, New file = ?? While RPM doesn't use checksums in this particular case, we'll describe it in those terms, for the sake of consistency. In this instance, RPM had not installed the file originally, so there is no original checksum. Because the file had not originally been installed as part of a package, there is no way for RPM to determine if the file currently in place had been modified. Therefore, the


78

Chapter 4:Using RPM to Upgrade Packages

checksums for the current file and the new file are irrelevant; they cannot be used to clear up the mystery. When this happens, RPM renames the file to .rpmorig, prints a warning, and installs the new file. This way, any modifications contained in the original file are saved. The system administrator can review the differences between the original and the newly installed files and determine what action should be taken. As you can see, in the majority of cases RPM will automatically take the proper course of action when performing an upgrade. It is only when config files have been modified and are to be overwritten, that RPM leaves any post-upgrade work for the system administrator. Even in those cases, many times the modified files are not worth saving and can be deleted.

4.2 Upgrading a Package
The most basic version of the rpm -U command is simply "rpm -U", followed by the name of a .rpm package file:
# rpm -U eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm #

Here, RPM performed all the steps necessary to upgrade the eject-1.2-2 package, faster than could have been done by hand. As in RPM's install command, Uniform Resource Locators, or URLs, can also be used to specify the package file. 4

4.2.1 rpm -U's Dirty Little Secret
Well, in the example above, we didn't tell the whole story. There was no older version of the eject package installed. Yes, it's true -- rpm -U works just fine as a replacement for the normal install command rpm -i. This is another, more concrete example of the strength of RPM's method of performing upgrades. Since RPM's install command is smart enough to handle upgrades,
4 For more information on RPM's use of URLs, please see Section 2.2.1, URLs -- Another Way to Specify Package Files.


Section 4.3:They're Nearly Identical...

79

RPM's upgrade command is really just another way to specify an install. Some people never even bother to use RPM's install command; they always use rpm -U. Maybe the "-U" should stand for, "Uh, do the right thing"...

4.3 They're Nearly Identical...
Given the fact that rpm -U can be used as a replacement to rpm -i, it follows that most of the options available for rpm -U are identical to those used with rpm -i. Therefore, to keep the duplication to a minimum, we'll discuss only those options that are unique to rpm -U, or that behave differently from the same option when used with rpm -i. The table on Table 4­1, rpm -U Command Syntax at the start of this chapter shows all valid options to RPM's upgrade command, and indicates which are identical to those used with rpm -i.

4.3.1 --oldpackage: Upgrade To An Older Version
This option might be used a bit more by people that like to stay on the "bleeding edge" of new versions of software, but eventually, everyone will probably need to use it. Usually, the situation plays out like this: · · · You hear about some new software that sounds pretty nifty, so you download the .rpm file and install it. The software is great! It does everything you ask for, and more. You end up using it every day for the next few months. You hear that a new version of your favorite software is available. You waste no time in getting the package. You upgrade the software by using rpm -U. No problem! Fingers arched in anticipation, you launch the new version. Your computer's screen goes blank!

·

Looks like a bug in the new version. Now what do you do? Hmmm. Maybe you can just "upgrade" to the older version. Let's try to go back to release 2 of cdp-0.33 from release 3:
# rpm -Uv cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm


80

Chapter 4:Using RPM to Upgrade Packages

package cdp-0.33-3 (which is newer) is already installed error: cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm cannot be installed #

That didn't work very well. At least it told us just what the problem was -- we were trying to upgrade to an older version of a package that is already installed. Fortunately, there's a special option for just this situation: --oldpackage. Let's give it a try:
# rpm -Uv --oldpackage cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-2.i386.rpm #

By using the --oldpackage option, release 3 of cdp-0.33 is history, and has been replaced by release 2.

4.3.2 --force: The Big Hammer
Adding --force to an upgrade command is a way of saying "Upgrade it anyway!" In essence, it adds --replacepkgs, --replacefiles, and --oldpackage to the command. Like a big hammer, --force is an irresistible force 5that makes things happen. In fact, the only thing that will prevent a --force'ed upgrade from proceeding is a dependency conflict. And like a big hammer, it pays to fully understand why you need to use --force before actually using it.

4.3.3 --noscripts: Do Not Execute Install and Uninstall Scripts
The --noscripts option prevents a package's pre- and post-install scripts from being executed. This is no different than the option's behavior when used with RPM's install command. However, there is an additional point to consider when the option is used during an upgrade. The following example uses specially-built packages that display messages when their scripts are executed by RPM:
5 Pun intended.


Section 4.3:They're Nearly Identical...

81

# rpm -i bother-2.7-1.i386.rpm This is the bother 2.7 preinstall script This is the bother 2.7 postinstall script #

In this case, a package has been installed. As expected, its scripts are executed. Next, let's upgrade this package:
# rpm This This This This # -U bother-3.5-1.i386.rpm is the bother 3.5 preinstall script is the bother 3.5 postinstall script is the bother 2.7 preuninstall script is the bother 2.7 postuninstall script

This is a textbook example of the sequence of events during an upgrade. The new version of the package is installed (as shown by the pre- and post-install scripts being executed). Finally, the previous version of the package is removed (showing the preand post-uninstall scripts being executed). There are really no surprises there -- it worked just the way it was meant to. This time, let's use the --noscripts option when the time comes to perform the upgrade:
# rpm -i bother-2.7-1.i386.rpm This is the bother 2.7 preinstall script This is the bother 2.7 postinstall script #

Again, the first package is installed, and its scripts are executed. Now let's try the upgrade using the --noscripts option:
# rpm -U --noscripts bother-3.5-1.i386.rpm This is the bother 2.7 preuninstall script This is the bother 2.7 postuninstall script #


82

Chapter 4:Using RPM to Upgrade Packages

The difference here is that the --noscripts option prevented the new package's scripts from executing. The scripts from the package being erased were still executed.


Getting Information About Packages

83

5 Getting Information About Packages
Table 5­1 rpm -q Command Syntax

rpm -q (or --query) options Package Selection Options pkg1 ... pkgN -p (or "-") Query installed package(s) Query package file (URLs OK) Query package owning Query all installed packages Query packages providing capability Query packages belonging to group Page The Package Label in Section 5.2.1 -p -- Query a Specific RPM Package File in Section 5.2.1 -f -- Query the Package Owning in Section 5.2.1 -a -- Query All Installed Packages in Section 5.2.1 --whatprovides : Query the Packages That Provide Capability in Section 5.2.1 -g : Query Packages Belonging To Group in Section 5.2.1

-f

-a --whatprovides

-g

--whatrequires

Query packages requiring --whatrequires : Query the Packages capability That Require Capability in Section 5.2.1 Page

Information Selection Options


84

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

-i

Display full package label The Package Label in Section 5.2.1 Display summary package information Display list of files in package Display list of configuration files -i -- Display Package Information in Section 5.2.2 -l -- Display the Package's File List in Section 5.2.2 -c -- Display the Package's List of Configuration Files in Section 5.2.2 -d -- Display a List of the Package's Documentation in Section 5.2.2 -s -- Display the State of Each File in the Package in Section 5.2.2 --scripts -- Show Scripts Associated With a Package in Section 5.2.2 --queryformat -- Construct a Custom Query Response in Section 5.2.2 --dump: Display All Verifiable Information for Each File in Section 5.2.2

-l

-c

-d

Display list of documentation files

-s

Display list of files in package, with state Display install, uninstall, verify scripts Display queried data in custom format

--scripts

--queryformat (or --qf)

--dump

Display all verifiable information for each file


Getting Information About Packages

85

--provides

Display capabilities package provides

--provides: Display Capabilities Provided by the Package in Section 5.2.2 --requires: Display Capabilities Required by the Package in Section 5.2.2 Page -v -- Display Additional Information in Section 5.2.2 Section 5.2.3, Getting a lot more information with -vv Section 5.2.4, --root : Use As An Alternate Root Section 5.2.5, --rcfile : Use As An Alternate rpmrc File Section 5.2.6, --dbpath : Use To Find RPM Database

--requires (or -R)

Display capabilities package requires

General Options -v Display additional information Display debugging information Set alternate root to Set alternate rpmrc file to

-vv

--root

--rcfile

--dbpath

Use to find the RPM database


86

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

5.1 rpm -q -- What does it do?
One of the nice things about using RPM is that the packages you manage don't end up going into some kind of black hole. Nothing would be worse than to install, upgrade, and erase several different packages and not have a clue as to what's on your system. In fact, RPM's query function can help you get out of sticky situations like: · · · You're poking around your system, and you come across a file that you just can't identify. Where did it come from? Your friend sends you a package file, and you have no idea what the package does, what it installs, or where it originally came from. You know that you installed XFree86 a couple months ago, but you don't know what version, and you can't find any documentation on it.

The list could go on, but you get the idea. The rpm -q command is what you need. If you're the kind of person that doesn't like to have more options than you know what to do with, rpm -q might look imposing. But fear not. Once you have a handle on the basic structure of an RPM query, it'll be a piece of cake.

5.2 The Parts of an RPM Query
It becomes easy to construct a query command once you understand the individual parts. First is the -q (You can also use --query, if you like). After all, you need to tell RPM what function to perform, right? The rest of a query command consists of two distinct parts: package selection (or what packages you'd like to query), and information selection (or what information you'd like to see). Let's take a look at package selection first:

5.2.1 Query Commands, Part One: Package Selection
The first thing you'll need to decide when issuing an RPM query is what package (or packages) you'd like to query. RPM has several ways to specify packages, so you have quite an assortment to choose from.


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

87

The Package Label In earlier chapters, we discussed RPM's package label, a string that uniquely identifies every installed package. Every label contains three pieces of information: 1. 2. 3. The name of the packaged software. The version of the packaged software. The package's release number.

When issuing a query command using package labels, you must always include the package name. You can also include the version and even the release, if you like. The only restrictions are that each part of the package label specified must be complete, and that if any parts of the package label are missing, all parts to the right must be omitted as well. This second restriction is just a long way of saying that if you specify the release, you must also specify the version as well. Let's look at a few examples. Say, for instance, you've recently installed a new version of the C libraries, but you can't remember the version number:
# rpm -q libc libc-5.2.18-1 #

In this type of query, RPM returns the complete package label for all installed packages that match the given information. In the example above, if version 5.2.17 of the C libraries was also installed, its package label would have been displayed, too. In this example, we've included the version as well as the package name:
# rpm -q rpm-2.3 rpm-2.3-1 #

Note, however, that RPM is a bit picky about specifying package names. Here are some queries for the C library that won't work:
# rpm -q LibC package LibC is not installed


88

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

# # rpm -q lib package lib is not installed # # rpm -q "lib*" package lib* is not installed # # rpm -q libc-5 package libc-5 is not installed # # rpm -q libc-5.2.1 package libc-5.2.1 is not installed #

As you can see, RPM is case sensitive about package names and cannot match partial names, version numbers, or release numbers. Nor can it use the wildcard characters we've come to know and love. As we've seen, however, RPM can perform the query when more than one field of the package label is present. In the above case, rpm -q libc-5.2.18, or even rpm -q libc-5.2.18-1 would have found the package, libc-5.2.18-1. Querying based on package labels may seem a bit restrictive. After all, you need to know the exact name of a package in order to perform a query on it. But there are other ways of specifying packages... -a -- Query All Installed Packages Want lots of information fast? Using the -a option, you can query every package installed on your system. For example:
# rpm -qa ElectricFence-2.0.5-2 ImageMagick-3.7-2 ... tetex-xtexsh-0.3.3-8 lout-3.06-4 #

(On a system installed using RPM, the number of packages can easily number 200 or more; we've deleted most of the output.)


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

89

The -a option can produce mountains of output, which makes it a prime candidate for piping through the many Linux/UNIX commands available. One of the prime candidates would be a pager such as more, so that the list of installed packages could be viewed a screenful at a time. Another handy command to pipe rpm -qa's output through is grep. In fact, using grep, it's possible to get around RPM's lack of built-in wildcard processing:
# rpm -qa | grep -i sysv SysVinit-2.64-2 #

In this example, we were able to find the SysVinit package, even though we didn't have the complete package name, or capitalization. -f -- Query the Package Owning How many times have you found a program sitting on your system and wondered "what does it do?" Well, if the program was installed by RPM as part of a package, it's easy to find out. Simply use the -f option. Example: You find a strange program called ls in /bin (Okay, it is a contrived example). Wonder what package installed it? Simple!
# rpm -qf /bin/ls fileutils-3.12-3 #

If you happen to point RPM at a file it didn't install, you'll get a message similar to the following:
# rpm -qf .cshrc file /home/ed/.cshrc is not owned by any package #

A Tricky Detail

It's possible that you'll get the "not owned by any package" message in error. Here's an example of how it can happen:
# rpm -qf /usr/X11/bin/xterm


90

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

file /usr/X11/bin/xterm is not owned by any package #

As you can see, we're trying to find out what package the xterm program is part of. The first example failed, which might lead one to believe that xterm really isn't owned by any package. However, let's look at a directory listing:
# ls -lF /usr ... lrwxrwxrwx 1 root drwxrwxr-x 7 root ... # root root 5 May 13 12:46 X11 -> X11R6/ 1024 Mar 21 00:21 X11R6/

(We've truncated the list; normally /usr is quite a bit more crowded than this.) The key here is the line ending with "X11 -> X11R6/". This is known as a "symbolic link". It's a way of referring to a file (here, a directory file) by another name. In this case, if we used the path /usr/X11, or /usr/X11R6, it shouldn't make a difference. It certainly doesn't make a difference to programs that simply want access to the file. But it does make a difference to RPM, because RPM doesn't use the filename to access the file. RPM uses the filename as a key into its database. It would be very difficult, if not impossible, to keep track of all the symlinks on a system and try every possible path to a file during a query. What to do? There are two options: 1. Make sure you always specify a path free of symlinks. This can be pretty tough, though. An alternative approach is to use namei to track down symlinks:
# f: d d l namei /usr/X11/bin/xterm /usr/X11/bin/xterm / usr X11 -> X11R6 d X11R6 d bin - xterm

#


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

91

It's pretty easy to see the X11 to X11R6 symlink. Using this approach you can enter the non-symlinked path and get the desired results:
# rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm XFree86-3.1.2-5 #

2.

Change your directory to the one holding the file you want to query. Even if you use a symlinked path to get there, querying the file should then work as you'd expect:
# cd /usr/X11/bin # rpm -qf xterm XFree86-3.1.2-5 #

So if you get a "not owned by any package" error, and you think it may not be true, try one of the approaches above. -p -- Query a Specific RPM Package File Up to now, every means of specifying a package to an RPM query focused on packages that had already been installed. While it's certainly very useful to be able to dredge up information about packages that are already on your system, what about packages that haven't yet been installed? The -p option can do that for you. One situation where this capability would help, occurs when the name of a package file has been changed. Since the name of the file containing a package has nothing to do with the name of the package (though, by tradition it's nice to name package files consistently), we can use this option to find out exactly what package a file contains:
# rpm -qp foo.bar rpm-2.3-1 #


92

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

With one command RPM gives you the answer.

1

The -p option can also use Uniform Resource Locators to specify package files. See Section 2.2.1, URLs -- Another Way to Specify Package Files for more information on using URLs. There's one last trick up -p's sleeve -- it can also perform a query by reading a package from standard input. Here's an example:
# cat bother-3.5-1.i386.rpm | rpm -qp bother-3.5-1 #

We piped the output of cat into RPM. The dash at the end of the command line directs RPM to read the package from standard input. -g : Query Packages Belonging To Group When a package is built, the package builder must classify the package, grouping it with other packages that perform similar functions. RPM gives you the ability to query installed packages based on their groups. For example, there is a group known as Base. This group consists of packages that provide low-level structure for a Linux distribution. Let's see what installed packages make up the Base group:
# rpm -qg Base setup-1.5-1 pamconfig-0.50-5 filesystem-1.2-1 crontabs-1.3-1 dev-2.3-1 etcskel-1.1-1 initscripts-2.73-1 mailcap-1.0-3 pam-0.50-17 passwd-0.50-2 redhat-release-4.0-1 rootfiles-1.3-1 termcap-9.12.6-5 # 1 On most Linux systems, the file command can be used to obtain similar information. See Appendix A, Format of the RPM File for details on how to add this capability to your system's file command.


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

93

One thing to keep in mind is that group specifications are case-sensitive. Issuing the command rpm -qg base won't produce any output. --whatprovides : Query the Packages That Provide Capability RPM provides extensive support for dependencies between packages. The basic mechanism used is that a package may require what another package provides. The thing that is required and provided can be a shared library's soname. It can also be a character string chosen by the package builder. In any case, it's important to be able to display which packages provide a given capability. This is just what the --whatprovides option does. When the option, followed by a capability, is added to a query command, RPM will select those packages that provide the capability. Here's an example:
# rpm -q --whatprovides module-info kernel-2.0.18-5 #

In this case, the only package that provides the module-info capability is kernel-2.0.18-5. --whatrequires : Query the Packages That Require Capability The --whatrequires option is the logical complement to the --whatprovides option described above. It is used to display which packages require the specified capability. Expanding on the example we started with --whatprovides, let's see which packages require the module-info capability:
# rpm -q --whatrequires module-info kernelcfg-0.3-2 #

There's only one package that requires module-info -- kernelcfg-0.3-2.


94

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

5.2.2 Query Commands, Part Two: Information Selection
After specifying the package (or packages) you wish to query, you'll need to figure out just what information you'd like RPM to retrieve. As we've seen, by default, RPM only returns the complete package label. But there's much more to a package than that. Here, we'll explore every information selection option available to us. -i -- Display Package Information Adding -i to rpm -q tells RPM to give you some information on the package or packages you've selected. For the sake of clarity, let's take a look at what it gives you and explain what you're looking at:
# rpm -qi rpm Name : rpm Distribution: Red Hat Linux Vanderbilt Version : 2.3 Vendor: Red Hat Software Release :1 Build Date: Tue Dec 24 09:07:59 1996 Install date: Thu Dec 26 23:01:51 1996 Build Host: porky.redhat.com Group : Utilities/System Source RPM: rpm-2.3-1.src.rpm Size : 631157 Summary : Red Hat Package Manager Description : RPM is a powerful package manager, which can be used to build, install, query, verify, update, and uninstall individual software packages. A package consists of an archive of files, and package information, including name, version, and description. #

There's quite a bit of information here, so let's go through it entry by entry: · · · Name -- The name of the package you queried. Usually (but not always) it bears some resemblance to the name of the underlying software. Version -- The version number of the software, as specified by the software's original creator. Release -- The number of times a package consisting of this software has been packaged. If the version number should change, the release number should start over again at "1".


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

95

As you've probably noticed, these three pieces of information comprise the package label we've come to know and love. Continuing, we have: · · Install date -- This is the time when the package was installed on your system. Group -- In our example, this looks suspiciously like a path. If you went searching madly for a directory tree by that name, you'd come up dry -- it isn't a set of directories at all. When a package builder starts to create a new package, they enter a list of words that describe the software. The list, which goes from least specific to most specific, attempts to categorize the software in a concise manner. The primary use for the group is to enable graphically oriented package managers based on RPM to present packages grouped by function. Red Hat Linux's glint command does this. · · · Size -- This is the size (in bytes) of every file in this package. It might make your decision to erase an unused package easier if you see six or more digits here. Summary -- This is a concise description of the packaged software. Description -- This is a verbose description of the packaged software. Some descriptions might be more, well, descriptive than others, but hopefully it will be enough to clue you in as to the software's role in the greater scheme of things. Distribution -- The word "distribution" is really not the best name for this field. "Product" might be a better choice. In any case, this is the name of the product this package is a part of. Vendor -- The organization responsible for building this package. Build Date -- The time the package was created. Build Host -- The name of the computer system that built the package. Source RPM -- The process of building a package results in two files:
2

·

· · · ·

2 Note to software packagers: Choose your build machine names wisely! A silly or offensive name might be embarrassing...


96

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

1. 2.

The package file used to install the packaged software. This is sometimes called the binary package. The package file containing the source code and other files used to create the binary package file. This is known as the source RPM package file. This is the filename that is displayed in this field.

Unless you want to make changes to the software, you probably won't need to worry about source packages. But if you do, stick around, because the second part of this book is for you... -l -- Display the Package's File List Adding -l to rpm -q tells RPM to display the list of files that are installed by the specified package or packages. If you've used ls before, you won't be surprised by RPM's file list. Here's a look at one of the smaller packages on Red Hat Linux -- adduser:
# rpm -ql adduser /usr/sbin/adduser #

The adduser package consists of only one file, so there's only one filename displayed.
-v -- Display Additional Information

In some cases, the -v option can be added to a query command for additional information. The -l option we've been discussing is an example of just such a case. Note how the -v option adds verbosity:
# rpm -qlv adduser -rwxr-xr-xroot # root 3894 Feb 25 13:45 /usr/sbin/adduser

Looks a lot like the output from ls, doesn't it? Looks can be deceiving. Everything you see here is straight from RPM's database. However, the format is identical to ls, so it's more easily understood. If this is Greek to you, consult the ls man page.


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

97

-c -- Display the Package's List of Configuration Files When -c is added to an rpm -q command, RPM will display the configuration files that are part of the specified package or packages. As mentioned earlier in the book, config files are important, because they control the behavior of the packaged software. Let's take a look at the list of config files for XFree86:
# rpm -qc XFree86 /etc/X11/fs/config /etc/X11/twm/system.twmrc /etc/X11/xdm/GiveConsole /etc/X11/xdm/TakeConsole /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession /etc/X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 /etc/X11/xdm/chooser /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc /etc/X11/xsm/system.xsm /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XF86Config #

These are the files you'd want to look at first if you were looking to customize XFree86 for your particular needs. Just like -l, we can also add v for more information:
# rpm -qcv XFree86 -r--r--r--- root root ... lrwxrwxrwx- root root # 423 Mar 21 00:17 /etc/X11/fs/config

30 Mar 21 00:29 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XF86Config -> ../../../../etc/X11/XF86

(Note that last file: RPM will display symbolic links, as well.) -d -- Display a List of the Package's Documentation When -d is added to a query, we get a list of all files containing documentation for the named package or packages. This is a great way to get up to speed when you're having problems with unfamiliar software. As with -c and -l, you'll see either a


98

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

simple list of filenames, or (if you've added -v) a more comprehensive list. Here's an example that might look daunting at first, but really isn't:
# rpm -qdcf /sbin/dump /etc/dumpdates /usr/doc/dump-0.3-5 /usr/doc/dump-0.3-5/CHANGES /usr/doc/dump-0.3-5/COPYRIGHT /usr/doc/dump-0.3-5/INSTALL /usr/doc/dump-0.3-5/KNOWNBUGS /usr/doc/dump-0.3-5/THANKS /usr/doc/dump-0.3-5/dump-0.3.announce /usr/doc/dump-0.3-5/dump.lsm /usr/doc/dump-0.3-5/linux-1.2.x.patch /usr/man/man8/dump.8 /usr/man/man8/rdump.8 /usr/man/man8/restore.8 /usr/man/man8/rmt.8 /usr/man/man8/rrestore.8 #

Let's take that alphabet soup set of options, one letter at a time: · · · · q -- Perform a query. d -- List all documentation files. c -- List all config files. f -- Query the package that owns the specified file (/sbin/dump, in this case).

The list of files represents all the documentation and config files that apply to the package owning /sbin/dump. -s -- Display the State of Each File in the Package Unlike the past three sections, which dealt with a list of files of one type or another, adding -s to a query will list the state of the files that comprise one or more packages. I can hear you out there; you're saying, "What is the state of a file?" For every file that RPM installs, there is an associated state. There are four possible states: 1. normal -- A file in the normal state has not been modified by installing another package on the system.


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

99

2. 3.

replaced -- Files in the replaced state have been modified by installing another package on the system. not installed -- A file is classified as not installed when it, er, isn't installed! This state is normally seen only if the package was partially installed. An example of a partially installed package would be one that was installed with the --excludedocs option. Using this option, no documentation files would be installed. The RPM database would still contain entries for these missing files, but their state would be not installed. net shared -- The net shared state is used to support client systems that NFS mount portions of their filesystems from a server. Since the server most likely exports filesystems to more than one client, if a client erased a package that contained files on a shared filesystem, other client systems would have incompletely installed packages. The net shared state is used to alert RPM to the fact that a file is on a shared filesystem and should not be erased. Files will be in the net shared state when two things happen: a. b. The netsharedpath rpmrc file entry has been changed from its default (null) value. 3 The file is to be installed in a directory within a net shared path.

4.

Here's an example showing how file states appear:
# rpm -qs adduser normal /usr/sbin/adduser #

(That normal at the start of the line is the state, followed by the file name) The file state is one of the tools RPM uses to determine the most appropriate action to take when packages are installed or erased. Now would the average person need to check the states of files? Not really. But if there should be problems, this kind of information can help get things back on track.
3 For more information on rpmrc file entries, please refer to Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


100

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

--provides: Display Capabilities Provided by the Package By adding --provides to a query command, we can see the capabilities provided by one or more packages. If the package doesn't provide any capabilities, the --provides option produces no output:
# rpm -q --provides rpm #

However, if a package does provide capabilities, they will be displayed:
# rpm -q --provides foonly index #

It's important to remember that capabilities are not filenames. In the above example, the foonly package contains no file called index; it's just a character string the package builder chose. This is no different from the following example:
# rpm -q --provides libc libm.so.5 libc.so.5 #

While there might be symlinks by those names in /lib, capabilities are a property of the package, not a file contained in the package! --requires: Display Capabilities Required by the Package The --requires option (-R is equivalent) is the logical complement to the --provides option. It displays the capabilities required by the specified package(s). If a package has no requirements, there's no output:
# rpm -q --requires adduser #

In cases where there are requirements, they are displayed as follows:
# rpm -q --requires rpm libz.so.1


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

101

libdb.so.2 libc.so.5 #

It's also possible that you'll come across something like this:
# rpm -q --requires blather bother >= 3.1 #

Packages may also be built to require another package. This requirement can also include specific versions. In the example above, the bother package is required by blather; specifically, a version of bother greater than or equal to 3.1. Here's something worth understanding. Let's say we decide to track down the bother that blather says it requires. If we use RPM's query capabilities, we could use the --whatprovides package selection option to try to find it:
# rpm -q --whatprovides bother no package provides bother #

No dice. This might lead you to believe that the blather package has a problem. The moral of this story is that, when trying to find out what package fulfills another package's requirements, it's a good idea to also try a simple query using the requirement as a package name. Continuing our example above, let's see if there's a package called bother:
# rpm -q bother bother-3.5-1 #

Bingo! However, if we see what capabilities the bother package provides, we come up dry:
# rpm -q --provides bother #


102

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

The reason for the lack of output is that all packages, by default, "provide" their package name (and version). --dump: Display All Verifiable Information for Each File The --dump option is used to display every piece of information RPM has on one or more files listed in its database. The information is listed in a very concise fashion. Since the --dump option displays file-related information, the list of files must be chosen by using the -l, -c, or -d options (or some combination thereof):
# rpm -ql --dump adduser /usr/sbin/adduser 4442 841083888 ca5fa53dc74952aa5b5e3a5fa5d8904b 0100755 root root 0 0 0 X #

What does all this stuff mean? Let's go through it, item-by-item: · · · · · · · · The /usr/sbin/adduser is simple: it's the name of the file being dump'ed. 4442 is the size of the file, in bytes. How about 841083888? It's the time the file was last modified, in seconds past the Unix zero date of January 1, 1970. The ca5fa53dc74952aa5b5e3a5fa5d8904b is the MD5 checksum of the file's contents, all 128 bits of it. If you guessed 0100755 was the file's mode, you'd be right. The first root represents the file's owner. The second root is the file's group. We'll take the next part (0 0) in one chunk. The first zero shows whether the file is a config file. If zero, as in this case, then the file is not a config file. The next zero shows whether the file is documentation. Again, since there is a zero here, this file isn't documentation, either. The final 0 represents the file's major and minor numbers. These are set only for device special files. Otherwise, it will be zero.

·


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

103

·

If the file were a symlink, the spot taken by the X would contain a path pointing to the linked file.

Normally, the --dump option is used by people that want to extract the file-related information from RPM and process it somehow. --scripts -- Show Scripts Associated With a Package If you add --scripts (that's two dashes) to a query, you get to see a little bit more of RPM's underlying magic:
# rpm -q --scripts XFree86 preinstall script: (none) postinstall script: /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/pamconfig --add --service=xdm --password=none --sesslist=none preuninstall script: (none) postuninstall script: /sbin/ldconfig if [ "$1" = 0 ] ; then /sbin/pamconfig --remove --service=xdm --password=none --sesslist=none fi verify script: (none) #

In this particular case, the XFree86 package has two scripts: one labeled postinstall, and one labeled postuninstall. As you might imagine, the postinstall script is executed just after the package's files have been installed; the postuninstall script is executed just after the package's files have been erased. Based on the labels in this example, you'd probably imagine that a package can have as many as five different scripts. You'd be right:


104

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

The preinstall script, which is executed just before the package's files are installed. The postinstall script, which is executed just after the package's files are installed. The preuninstall script, which is executed just before the package's files are removed. The postuninstall script, which is executed just after the package's files are removed. And finally, the verify script. While it's easy to figure out the other scripts' functions based on their name, what does a script called verify do? Well, we haven't gotten to it yet, but packages can also be verified for proper installation. This script is used during verification. 4

Is this something you'll need very often? As in the case of displaying file states, not really. But when you need it, you really need it! --queryformat -- Construct a Custom Query Response OK, say you're still not satisfied. You'd like some additional information, or you think a different format would be easier on the eyes. Maybe you want to take some information on the packages you've installed and run it through a script for some specialized processing. You can do it, using the --queryformat option. In fact, if you look back at the output of the -i option, RPM was using --queryformat internally. Here's how it works: On the RPM command line, include --queryformat. Right after that, enter a format string, enclosed in single quotes "'". The format string can consist of a number of different components: · · · Literal text, including escape sequences. Tags, with optional field width, formatting, and iteration information. Array Iterators.

4 For more information on package verification, please see Section 6.1, rpm -V -- What Does it Do?.


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

105

Let's look at each of these components.
Literal text

Any part of a format string that is not associated with tags or array iterators will be treated as literal text. Literal text is just that: It's text that is printed just as it appears in the format string. In fact, a format string can consist of nothing but literal text, although the output wouldn't tell us much about the packages being queried. Let's give the --queryformat option a try, using a format string with nothing but literal text:
# rpm -q --queryformat 'This is a test!' rpm This is a test!#

The RPM command might look a little unusual, but if you take out the --queryformat option, along with its format string, you'll see this is just an ordinary query of the rpm package. When the --queryformat option is present, RPM will use the text immediately following the option as a format string. In our case, the format string is 'This is a test!'. The single quotes are required. Otherwise, it's likely your shell will complain about some of the characters contained in the average format string. The output of this command appears on the second line. As we can see, the literal text from the format string was printed exactly as it was entered.
Carriage Control Escape Sequences

Wait a minute. What is that # doing at the end of the output? Well, that's our shell prompt. You see, we didn't direct RPM to move to a new line after producing the output, so the shell prompt ended up being tacked to the end of our output. Is there a way to fix that? Yes, there is. We need to use an escape sequence. An escape sequence is a sequence of characters that starts with a backslash (\). Escape sequences add carriage control information to a format string. The following escape sequences can be used: · · \a -- Produces a bell or similar alert. \b -- Backspaces one character.


106

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

· · · · · ·

\f -- Outputs a form-feed character. \n -- Outputs a newline character sequence. \r -- Outputs a carriage return character. \t -- Causes a horizontal tab. \v -- Causes a vertical tab. \\ -- Displays a backslash character.

Based on this list, it seems that a \n escape sequence at the end of the format string will put our shell prompt on the next line:
# rpm -q --queryformat 'This is a test!\n' rpm This is a test! #

Much better...
Tags

The most important parts of a format string are the tags. Each tag specifies what information is to be displayed and can optionally include field-width, as well as justification and data formatting instructions. 5But for now, let's look at the basic tag. In fact, let's look at three -- the tags that print the package name, version, and release. Strangely enough, these tags are called NAME, VERSION, and RELEASE. In order to be used in a format string, the tag names must be enclosed in curly braces and preceded by a percent sign. Let's give it a try:
# rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}%{VERSION}%{RELEASE}\n' rpm rpm2.31 #

Let's add a dash between the tags and see if that makes the output a little easier to read:
5 RPM uses printf to do --queryformat formatting. Therefore, you can use any of the printf format modifiers discussed in the printf(3) man page.


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

107

# rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n' rpm rpm-2.3-1 #

Now our format string outputs standard package labels.
Field Width and Justification

Sometimes it's desirable to allocate fields of a particular size for a tag. This is done by putting the desired field width between the tag's leading percent sign, and the opening curly brace. Using our package-label-producing format string, let's allocate a 20-character field for the version:
# rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}-%20{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n' rpm rpm2.3-1 #

The result is a field of 20 characters: 17 spaces, followed by the three characters that make up the version. In this case, the version field is right justified; that is, the data is printed at the far right of the output field. We can left justify the field by preceding the field width specification with a dash:
# rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}-%-20{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n' rpm rpm-2.3 -1 #

Now the version is printed at the far left of the output field. You might be wondering what would happen if the field width specification didn't leave enough room for the data being printed. The field width specification can be considered the minimum width the field will take. If the data being printed is wider, the field will expand to accommodate the data.
Modifiers -- Making Data More Readable

While RPM does its best to appropriately display the data from a --queryformat, there are times when you'll need to lend a helping hand. Here's an example. Say we want to display the name of each installed package, followed by the time the package


108

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

was installed. Looking through the available tags, we see INSTALLTIME. Great! Looks like this will be simple:
# rpm -qa --queryformat '%{NAME} was installed on %{INSTALLTIME}\n' setup was installed on 845414601 pamconfig was installed on 845414602 filesystem was installed on 845414607 ... rpm was installed on 851659311 pgp was installed on 846027549 #

Well, that's a lot of output, but not very useful. What are those numbers? RPM didn't lie -- they're the time the packages were installed. The problem is, the times are being displayed in their numeric form used internally by the operating system, and humans like to see the day, month, year, and so on. Fortunately, there's a modifier for just this situation. The name of the modifier is :date, and it follows the tag name. Let's try our example again, this time using :date:
# rpm -qa --queryformat '%{NAME} was installed on %{INSTALLTIME:date}\n' setup was installed on Tue Oct 15 17:23:21 1996 pamconfig was installed on Tue Oct 15 17:23:22 1996 filesystem was installed on Tue Oct 15 17:23:27 1996 ... rpm was installed on Thu Dec 26 23:01:51 1996 pgp was installed on Tue Oct 22 19:39:09 1996 #

That sure is a lot easier to understand, isn't it? Here's a list of the available modifiers: · · The :date modifier displays dates in human-readable form. It transforms 846027549 into Tue Oct 22 19:39:09 1996. The :perms modifier displays file permissions in an easy-to-read format. It changes -32275 to -rwxr-xr-x-.


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

109

· ·

The :depflags modifier displays the version comparison flags used in dependency processing, in human-readable form. It turns 12 into >=. The :fflags modifier displays a c if the file has been marked as being a configuration file, a d if the file has been marked as being a documentation file, and blank otherwise. Thus, 2 becomes d.

Array Iterators

Until now, we've been using tags that represent single data items. There is, for example, only one package name or installation date for each package. However, there are other tags that can represent many different pieces of data. One such tag is FILENAMES, which can be used to display the names of every file contained in a package. Let's put together a format string that will display the package name, followed by the name of every file that package contains. We'll try it on the adduser package first, since it contains only one file:
# rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}: %{FILENAMES}\n' adduser adduser: /usr/sbin/adduser #

Hey, not bad -- got it on the first try. Now let's try it on a package with more than one file:
# rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}: %{FILENAMES}\n' etcskel etcskel: (array) #

Hmmm. What went wrong? It worked before... Well, it worked before because the adduser package contained only one file. The FILENAMES tag points to an array of names, so when there is more than one file in a package, there's a problem. But there is a solution. It's called an iterator. An iterator can step through each entry in an array, producing output as it goes. Iterators are created when square braces enclose one or more tags and literal text. Since we want to iterate through the FILENAMES array, let's enclose that tag in the iterator:


110

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

# rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}: [%{FILENAMES}]\n' etcskel etcskel: /etc/skel/etc/skel/.Xclients/etc/skel/.Xdefaults/etc/skel/.ba #

There was more output -- it went right off the screen in one long line. The problem? We didn't include a newline escape sequence inside the iterator. Let's try it again:
# rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}: [%{FILENAMES}\n]' etcskel etcskel: /etc/skel /etc/skel/.Xclients /etc/skel/.Xdefaults /etc/skel/.bash_logout /etc/skel/.bash_profile /etc/skel/.bashrc /etc/skel/.xsession #

That's more like it. If we wanted, we could put another file-related tag inside the iterator. If we included the FILESIZES tag, we'd be able to see the name of each file, as well as how big it was:
# rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}: [%{FILENAMES} (%{FILESIZES} bytes)\n]' etcskel etcskel: /etc/skel (1024 bytes) /etc/skel/.Xclients (551 bytes) /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (3785 bytes) /etc/skel/.bash_logout (24 bytes) /etc/skel/.bash_profile (220 bytes) /etc/skel/.bashrc (124 bytes) /etc/skel/.xsession (9 bytes) #

That's pretty nice. But it would be even nicer if the package name appeared on each line, along with the filename and size. Maybe if we put the NAME tag inside the iterator:
# rpm -q --queryformat '[%{NAME}: %{FILENAMES} \ ? (%{FILESIZES} bytes)\n]' etcskel etcskel: /etc/skel(parallel array size mismatch)#


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

111

The error message says it all. The FILENAMES and FILESIZES arrays are the same size. The NAME tag isn't even an array. Of course the sizes don't match!
Iterating Single-Entry Tags

If a tag only has one piece of data, it's possible to put it in an iterator and have its one piece of data displayed with every iteration. This is done by preceding the tag name with an equal sign. Let's try it out on our current example:
# rpm -q --queryformat '[%{=NAME}: %{FILENAMES} (%{FILESIZES} bytes)\n]' etcskel etcskel: /etc/skel (1024 bytes) etcskel: /etc/skel/.Xclients (551 bytes) etcskel: /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (3785 bytes) etcskel: /etc/skel/.bash_logout (24 bytes) etcskel: /etc/skel/.bash_profile (220 bytes) etcskel: /etc/skel/.bashrc (124 bytes) etcskel: /etc/skel/.xsession (9 bytes) #

That's about all there is to format strings. Now, if RPM's standard output doesn't give you what you want, you have no reason to complain. Just --queryformat it!
In Case You Were Wondering...

What's that? You say you don't know what tags are available? You can use RPM's --querytags option. When used as the only option (ie, rpm --querytags), it produces a list of available tags. It should be noted that RPM displays the complete tag name. For instance, RPMTAG_ARCH is the complete name, yet you'll only need to use ARCH in your format string. Here's a partial example of the --querytags option in action:
# rpm --querytags RPMTAG_NAME RPMTAG_VERSION RPMTAG_RELEASE ... RPMTAG_VERIFYSCRIPT #


112

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

Be forewarned: the full list is quite lengthy. At the time this book was written, there were over 70 tags! You'll notice that each tag is printed in uppercase, and is preceded with RPMTAG_. If we were to use that last tag, RPMTAG_VERIFYSCRIPT, in a format string, it could be specified in any of the following ways:
%{RPMTAG_VERIFYSCRIPT} %{RPMTAG_VerifyScript} %{RPMTAG_VeRiFyScRiPt} %{VERIFYSCRIPT} %{VerifyScript} %{VeRiFyScRiPt}

The only hard-and-fast rule regarding tags is that if you include the RPMTAG_ prefix, it must be all uppercase. The fourth example above shows the traditional way of specifying a tag -- prefix omitted, all uppercase. The choice, however, is yours. One other thing to keep in mind is that not every package will have every type of tagged information available. In cases where the requested information is not available, RPM will display (none) or (unknown). There are also a few tags that, for one reason or another, will not produce useful output when using in a format string. For a comprehensive list of queryformat tags, please see Appendix D, Available Tags For --queryformat.

5.2.3 Getting a lot more information with -vv
Sometimes it's necessary to have even more information than we can get with -v. By adding another v, we can start to see more of RPM's inner workings:
# rpm -qvv rpm D: opening database in //var/lib/rpm/ D: querying record number 2341208 rpm-2.3-1 #


Section 5.2:The Parts of an RPM Query

113

The lines starting with D: have been added by using -vv. We can see where the RPM database is located and what record number contains information on the rpm-2.3-1 package. Following that is the usual output. In the vast majority of cases, it will not be necessary to use -vv. It is normally used by software engineers working on RPM itself, and the output can change without notice. However, it's a handy way to gain insights into RPM's inner workings.

5.2.4 --root : Use As An Alternate Root
Adding --root to a query command forces RPM to assume that the directory specified by is actually the "root" directory. In addition, RPM expects its database to reside in the directory specified by the dbpath rpmrc file entry, relative to . 6 Normally this option is only used during an initial system install, or when a system has been booted off a "rescue disk", and some packages need to be re-installed in order to restore normal operation.

5.2.5 --rcfile : Use As An Alternate rpmrc File
The --rcfile option is used to specify a file containing default settings for RPM. Normally, this option is not needed. By default, RPM uses /etc/rpmrc and a file named .rpmrc, located in your login directory. This option would be used if there was a need to switch between several sets of RPM options. Software developer and package builders will be the people using --rcfile. For more information on rpmrc files, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.

5.2.6 --dbpath : Use To Find RPM Database
In order for RPM to do its handiwork, it needs access to an RPM database. Normally, this database exists in the directory specified by the rpmrc file entry, dbpath. By default, dbpath is set to /var/lib/rpm.
6 For more information on rpmrc file entries, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


114

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

Although the dbpath entry can be modified in the appropriate rpmrc file, the --dbpath option is probably a better choice when the database path needs to be changed temporarily. An example of a time the --dbpath option would come in handy is when it's necessary to examine an RPM database copied from another system. Granted, it's not a common occurrence, but it's difficult to handle any other way.

5.3 A Few Handy Queries
Below are some examples of situations you might find yourself in, and ways you can use RPM to get the information you need. Keep in mind that these are just examples. Don't be afraid to experiment!

5.3.1 Finding Config Files Based on a Program Name
You're setting up a new system, and you'd like to implement some system-wide aliases for people using the Bourne Again SHell, bash. The problem is you just can't remember the name of the system-wide initialization file used by bash, or where it resides:
# rpm -qcf /bin/bash /etc/bashrc #

Rather than spending time trying to hunt down the file, RPM finds it for you in seconds.

5.3.2 Learning More About an Uninstalled Package
Practically any option can be combined with -qp to extract information from a .rpm file. Let's say you have an unknown .rpm file, and you'd like to know a bit more before installing it:
# rpm -qpil foo.bar Name : rpm Version : 2.3 Release :1 Install date: (none) Group : Utilities/System Size : 631157 Distribution: Vendor: Build Date: Build Host: Source RPM: Red Hat Linux Vanderbilt Red Hat Software Tue Dec 24 09:07:59 1996 porky.redhat.com rpm-2.3-1.src.rpm


Section 5.3:A Few Handy Queries

115

Summary : Red Hat Package Manager Description : RPM is a powerful package manager, which can be used to build, install, query, verify, update, and uninstall individual software packages. A package consists of an archive of files, and package information, including name, version, and description. /bin/rpm /usr/bin/find-provides /usr/bin/find-requires /usr/bin/gendiff /usr/bin/rpm2cpio /usr/doc/rpm-2.3-1 ... /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES /usr/src/redhat/SPECS /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS #

By displaying the package information, we know that we have a package file containing RPM version 2.3. We can then peruse the file list, and see exactly what it would install before installing it.

5.3.3 Finding Documentation for a Specific Package
Picking on bash some more, you realize that your knowledge of the software is lacking. You'd like to see when it was installed on your system, and what documentation is available for it:
# rpm -qid bash Name :bash Distribution: Version :1.14.6 Vendor: Release :2 Build Date: Install date:Mon May 13 12:47:22 1996 Build Host: Group :Shells Source RPM: Size :486557 Description :GNU Bourne Again Shell (bash) /usr/doc/bash-1.14.6-2 /usr/doc/bash-1.14.6-2/NEWS /usr/doc/bash-1.14.6-2/README /usr/doc/bash-1.14.6-2/RELEASE /usr/info/bash.info.gz /usr/man/man1/bash.1 # Red Hat Linux (Picasso) Red Hat Software Sun Feb 25 13:59:26 1996 porky.redhat.com bash-1.14.6-2.src.rpm


116

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages

You never realized that there could be so much documentation for a shell!

5.3.4 Finding Similar Packages
Looking at bash's information, we see that it belongs to the group "Shells". You're not sure what other shell packages are installed on your system. If you can find other packages in the "Shells" group, you'll have found the other installed shells:
# rpm -qa --queryformat '%10{NAME} %20{GROUP}\n' | grep -i shells ash Shells bash Shells csh Shells mc Shells tcsh Shells #

Now you can query each of these packages, and learn more about them, too.

7

5.3.5 Finding Recently Installed Packages, Part I
You remember installing a new package a few days ago. All you know for certain is that the package installed a new command in the /bin directory. Let's try to find the package:
# find /bin -type f -mtime -14 | rpm -qF rpm-2.3-1 #

Looks like RPM version 2.3 was installed sometime in the last two weeks.

5.3.6 Finding Recently Installed Packages, Part II
Another way to see which packages were recently installed is to use the --queryformat option:
7 Did you see this example and say to yourself, "Hey, they could've used the -g option to query for that group directly"? If you did, you've been paying attention. This is a more general way of searching the RPM database for information: we just happened to search by group in this example.


Section 5.3:A Few Handy Queries

117

# rpm -qa --queryformat '%{installtime} %{name}-%{version}-%{release} %{installtime:date}\n' | sort -nr +1 | sed -e 's/^[^ ]* //' rpm-devel-2.3-1 Thu Dec 26 23:02:05 1996 rpm-2.3-1 Thu Dec 26 23:01:51 1996 pgp-2.6.3usa-2 Tue Oct 22 19:39:09 1996 ... pamconfig-0.50-5 Tue Oct 15 17:23:22 1996 setup-1.5-1 Tue Oct 15 17:23:21 1996 #

By having RPM include the installation time in numeric form, it was simple to sort the packages and then use sed to remove the user-unfriendly numeric time.

5.3.7 Finding the Largest Installed Packages
Let's say that you're running low on disk space, and you'd like to see what packages you have installed, along with the amount of space each package takes up. You'd also like to see the largest packages first, so you can get back as much disk space as possible:
# rpm -qa --queryformat '%{name-%{version}-%{release} %{size}\n' | sort -nr +1 kernel-source-2.0.18-5 20608472 tetex-0.3.4-3 19757371 emacs-el-19.34-1 12259914 ... rootfiles-1.3-1 3494 mkinitrd-1.0-1 1898 redhat-release-4.0-1 22 #

If you don't build custom kernels, or use TeX, it's easy to see how much space could be reclaimed by removing those packages.


118

Chapter 5:Getting Information About Packages


Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages

119

6 Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages
Table 6­1 rpm -V Command Syntax

rpm -V or (--verify, or -y) options Package Selection Options pkg1 ... pkgN Verify named package(s) Page Section 6.3.1, The Package Label -- Verify an Installed Package Against the RPM Database Section 6.3.4, -p -- Verify Against a Specific Package File Section 6.3.3, -f -- Verify the Package Owning Against the RPM Database Section 6.3.2, -a -- Verify All Installed Packages Against the RPM Database Section 6.3.5, -g -- Verify Packages Belonging To Page

-p

Verify against package file

-f

Verify package owning

-a

Verify all installed packages

-g

Verify packages belonging to group Verify-specific Options


120

Chapter 6:Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages

--noscripts

Do not execute verification script

Section 6.3.7, --noscripts: Do Not Execute Verification Script Section 6.3.6, --nodeps: Do Not Check Dependencies During Verification Section 6.3.8, --nofiles: Do Not Verify File Attributes Page Section 6.3.9, -v -- Display Additional Information Section 6.3.10, -vv -- Display Debugging Information Section 6.3.12, --root : Set Alternate Root to

--nodeps

Do not verify dependencies

--nofiles

Do not verify file attributes General Options

-v

Display additional information Display debugging information Set alternate root to

-vv

--root

--rcfile

Set alternate rpmrc file to Section 6.3.13, --rcfile : Set Alternate rpmrc file to Use to find the RPM database Section 6.3.11, --dbpath : Use To Find RPM Database

--dbpath


Section 6.1:rpm -V -- What Does it Do?

121

6.1 rpm -V -- What Does it Do?
From time to time, it's necessary to make sure that everything on your system is "OK". Are you sure the packages you've installed are still configured properly? Have there been any changes made that you don't know about? Did you mistakenly start a recursive delete in /usr and now have to assess the damage? RPM can help. It can alert you to changes made to any of the files installed by RPM. Also, if a package requires capabilities provided by another package, it can make sure the other package is installed, too. The command rpm -V (The options -y and --verify are equivalent) verifies an installed package. Before we see how this is done, let's take a step back and look at the big picture. Every time a package is installed, upgraded, or erased, the changes are logged in RPM's database. It's necessary for RPM to keep track of this information; otherwise it wouldn't be able to perform these operations correctly. You can think of the RPM database (and the disk space it consumes) as being the "price of admission" for the easy package management that RPM provides. 1 The RPM database reflects the configuration of the system on which it resides. When RPM accesses the database to see how files should be manipulated during an install, upgrade, or erase, it is using the database as a mirror of the system's configuration. However, we can also use the system configuration as a mirror of the RPM database. What does this "backward" view give us? What purpose would be served? The purpose would be to see if the system configuration accurately reflects the contents of the RPM database. If the system configuration doesn't match the database, then we can reach one of two conclusions: 1. 2. The RPM database has become corrupt. The system configuration is unchanged. The RPM database is intact. The system configuration has changed.

1 Actually, the price is fairly low. For a completely RPM-based Linux distribution, it would be unusual to have a database over 5MB in size.


122

Chapter 6:Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages

While it would be foolish to state that an RPM database has never become corrupt, it is a sufficiently rare occurrence that the second conclusion is much more likely. So RPM gives us a powerful verification tool, essentially for free.

6.1.1 What Does it Verify?
It would be handy if RPM did nothing more than verify that every file installed by a package actually exists on your system. In reality, RPM does much more. It makes sure that if a package depends on other packages to provide certain capabilities, the necessary packages are, in fact, installed. If the package builder created one, RPM will also run a special verification script that can verify aspects of the package's installation that RPM cannot. Finally, every file installed by RPM is examined. No less than nine different attributes of each file can be checked. Here is the list of attributes: · · · · · · · · · Owner Group Mode MD5 Checksum Size Major Number Minor Number Symbolic Link String Modification Time

Let's take a look at each of these attributes and why they are good things to check: File Ownership Most operating systems today keep track of each file's creator. This is done primarily for resource accounting. Linux and UNIX also use file ownership to help determine access rights to the file. In addition, some files, when executed by a user, can temporarily change the user's ID, normally to a more privileged ID. Therefore, any


Section 6.1:rpm -V -- What Does it Do?

123

change of file ownership may have far reaching effects on data security and system availability. File Group In a similar manner to file ownership, a "group" specification is attached to each file. Primarily used for determining access rights, a file's group specification can also become a user's group ID, should that user execute the file's contents. Therefore, any changes in a file's group specification are important, and should be monitored. File Mode Encompassing the file's "permissions", the mode is a set of bits that specifies permitted access for the file's owner, group members, and everyone else. Even more important are two additional bits that determine whether a user's group or user ID should be changed if they execute the program contained in the file. Since these little bombshells can let any user become root for the duration of the program, it pays to be extra careful with a file's permissions. MD5 Checksum The MD5 checksum of a file is simply a 128-bit number that is mathematically derived from the contents of the file. The MD5 algorithm was designed by Ron Rivest, the "R" in the popular RSA public-key encryption algorithm. The "MD" in "MD5" stands for Message Digest, which is a pretty accurate description of what it does. Unlike literary digests, an MD5 checksum conveys no information about the contents of the original file. However, it possesses one unique trait: · Any change to the file, no matter how small, results in a change to the MD5 checksum. 2

RPM creates MD5 checksums of all files it manipulates, and stores them in its database. For all intents and purposes, if one of these files is changed, the MD5 checksum will change, and RPM will detect it.
2 From a strictly theoretical standpoint, this is not entirely true. Using the lingo of cryptologists, it is believed to be "computationally infeasible" to find two messages that produce the same MD5 checksum.


124

Chapter 6:Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages

File Size As if the use of MD5 isn't enough, RPM also keeps track of file sizes. A difference of even one byte more or less will not go unnoticed. Major Number Device character and block files possess a major number. The major number is used to communicate information to the device driver associated with the special file. For instance, under Linux the special files for SCSI disk drives should have a major number of 8, while the major number for an IDE disk drive's special file would be 3. As you can imagine, any change to a file's major number can have disastrous effects, and is tracked by RPM. Minor Number A file's minor number is similar in concept to the major number, but conveys different information to the device driver. In the case of disk drives, this information can consist of a unit identifier. Should the minor number change, RPM will detect it. Symbolic Link If the file in question is really a symbolic link, the text string containing the name of the linked-to file is checked. Modification Time Most operating systems keep track of the date and time that a file was last modified. RPM uses this to its advantage by keeping modification times in its database.

6.2 When Verification Fails -- rpm -V Output
When verifying a package, RPM produces output only if there is a verification failure. When a file fails verification, the format of the output is a bit cryptic, but it packs all the information you need into one line per file. Here is the format:
SM5DLUGT c

Where:


Section 6.2:When Verification Fails -- rpm -V Output

125

· · · · · · · · ·

S is the file size. M is the file's mode. 5 is the MD5 checksum of the file. D is the file's major and minor numbers. L is the file's symbolic link contents. U is owner of the file. G is the file's group. T is the modification time of the file. c appears only if the file is a configuration file. This is handy for quickly identifying config files, as they are very likely to change, and therefore, very unlikely to verify successfully. is the file that failed verification. The complete path is listed to make it easy to find.

·

It's unlikely that every file attribute will fail to verify, so each of the eight attribute flags will only appear if there is a problem. Otherwise, a "." will be printed in that flag's place. Let's look at an example or two:
.M5....T /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir

In this case, the mode, MD5 checksum, and modification time for the specified file have failed to verify. The file is not a config file (Note the absence of a "c" between the attribute list and the filename).
S.5....T c /etc/passwd

Here, the size, checksum, and modification time of the system password file have all changed. The "c" indicates that this is a config file.
missing /var/spool/at/spool


126

Chapter 6:Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages

This last example illustrates what RPM does when a file, that should be there, is missing entirely.

6.2.1 Other Verification Failure Messages
When rpm -V finds other problems, the output is a bit easier to understand:
# rpm -V blather Unsatisfied dependencies for blather-7.9-1: bother >= 3.1 #

It's pretty easy to see that the blather package requires at least version 3.1 of the bother package. The output from a package's verification script is a bit harder to categorize, as the script's contents, as well as its messages, are entirely up to the package builder.

6.3 Selecting What to Verify, and How
There are several ways to verify packages installed on your system. If you've taken a look at RPM's query command, you'll find that many of them are similar. Let's start with the simplest method of specifying packages -- the package label.

6.3.1 The Package Label -- Verify an Installed Package Against the RPM Database
You can simply follow the rpm -V command with all or part of a package label. As with every other RPM command that accepts package labels, you'll need to carefully specify each part of the label you include. Keep in mind that package names are case-sensitive, so rpm -V PackageName and rpm -V packagename are not the same. Let's verify the initscripts package:
# rpm -V initscripts #

While it looks like RPM didn't do anything, the following steps were performed: · For every file in the package, RPM checked the nine file attributes that were discussed above.


Section 6.3:Selecting What to Verify, and How

127

· ·

If the package was built with dependencies, the RPM database was searched to ensure the packages that satisfy those dependencies were installed. If the package was built with a verification script, that script was executed.

In our example, each of these steps was performed without error -- the package verified successfully. Remember, with rpm -V you'll only see output if a package fails to verify.

6.3.2 -a -- Verify All Installed Packages Against the RPM Database
If you add -a to rpm -V, you can easily verify every installed package on your system. It might take a while, but when it's done, you'll know exactly what's been changed on your system:
# rpm -Va .M5....T missing missing S.5....T ..5....T c ..5..... # /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir /var/spool/at/.lockfile /var/spool/at/spool /usr/lib/rhs/glint/icon.pyc /etc/inittab /usr/bin/loadkeys

Don't be too surprised if rpm -Va turns up a surprising number of files that failed verification. RPM's verification process is very strict! In many cases, the changes flagged don't indicate problems -- they are only an indication of your system's configuration being different than what the builders of the installed packages had on their system. Also, some attributes change during normal system operation. However, it would be wise to check into each verification failure, just to make sure.

6.3.3 -f -- Verify the Package Owning Against the RPM Database
Imagine this: you're hard at work when a program you've used a million times before suddenly stops working. What do you do? Well, before using RPM, you probably


128

Chapter 6:Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages

tried to find other files associated with that program and see if they had changed recently. Now you can let RPM do at least part of that sleuthing for you. Simply direct RPM to verify the package owning the ailing program:
% rpm -Vf /sbin/cardmgr S.5....T c /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia %

Hmmmm. Looks like a config file was recently changed. This isn't to say that using RPM to verify a package will always get you out of trouble, but it's such a quick step it should be one of the first things you try. Here's an example of rpm -Vf not working out as well:
% rpm -Vf /etc/blunder file /etc/blunder is not owned by any package %

(Note that the issue surrounding RPM and symbolic links mentioned in A Tricky Detail in Section 5.2.1 also applies to rpm -Vf. Watch those symlinks!)

6.3.4 -p -- Verify Against a Specific Package File
Unlike the previous options to rpm -V, each of which verified one or more packages against RPM's database, the -p option performs the same verification, but against a package file. Why on earth would you want to do this when the RPM database is sitting there just waiting to be used? Well, what if you didn't have an RPM database? While it isn't a common occurrence, power failures, hardware problems, and inadvertent deletions (along with non-existent backups) can leave your system "sans database". Then your system hiccups -- what do you do now? This is where a CD full of package files can be worth its weight in gold. Simply mount the CD and verify to your heart's content:
# rpm -Vp /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/i386/adduser-1.1-1.i386.rpm #


Section 6.3:Selecting What to Verify, and How

129

Whatever else might be wrong with this system, at least we can add new users. But what if you have many packages to verify? It would be a very slow process doing it one package at a time. That's where the next option comes in handy...

6.3.5 -g -- Verify Packages Belonging To
When a package is built, the package builder must classify the package, grouping it with other packages that perform similar functions. RPM gives you the ability to verify installed packages based on their groups. For example, there is a group known as Shells. This group consists of packages that contain, strangely enough, shells. Let's verify the proper installation of every shell-related package on the system:
# rpm -Vg Shells missing /etc/bashrc #

One thing to keep in mind is that group specifications are case-sensitive. Issuing the command rpm -Vg shells wouldn't verify many packages:
# rpm -Vg shells group shells does not contain any packages #

6.3.6 --nodeps: Do Not Check Dependencies During Verification
When the --nodeps option is added to a verify command, RPM will bypass its dependency verification processing. In this example, we've added the -vv option to so we can watch RPM at work:
# rpm -Vvv rpm D: opening database in //var/lib/rpm/ D: verifying record number 2341208 D: dependencies: looking for libz.so.1


130

Chapter 6:Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages

D: dependencies: looking for libdb.so.2 D: dependencies: looking for libc.so.5 #

As we can see, there are three different capabilities that the rpm package requires: · · · libz.so.1 libdb.so.2 libc.so.5

If we add the --nodeps option, the dependency verification of the three capabilities is no longer performed:
# rpm -Vvv --nodeps rpm D: opening database in //var/lib/rpm/ D: verifying record number 2341208 #

The line D: verifying record number 2341208 indicates that RPM's normal file-based verification proceeded normally.

6.3.7 --noscripts: Do Not Execute Verification Script
Adding the --noscripts option to a verify command prevents execution of the verification scripts of each package being verified. In the following example, the package verification script is executed:
# rpm -Vvv bother D: opening database in //var/lib/rpm/ D: verifying record number 616728 D: verify script found - running from file /var/tmp/rpm-321.vscript + PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin + export PATH + echo This is the bother 3.5 verification script This is the bother 3.5 verification script #


Section 6.3:Selecting What to Verify, and How

131

While the actual script is not very interesting, it did execute when the package was being verified. In the next example, we'll use the --noscripts option to prevent its execution:
# rpm -Vvv --noscripts bother D: opening database in //var/lib/rpm/ D: verifying record number 616728 #

As expected, the output is identical to the prior example -- minus the lines dealing with the verification script, of course.

6.3.8 --nofiles: Do Not Verify File Attributes
The --nofiles option disables RPM's file-related verification processing. When this option is used, only the verification script and dependency verification processing are performed. In this example, the package has a file-related verification problem:
# rpm -Vvv bash D: opening database in //var/lib/rpm/ D: verifying record number 279448 D: dependencies: looking for libc.so.5 D: dependencies: looking for libtermcap.so.2 missing /etc/bashrc #

When the --nofiles option is added, the missing file doesn't cause a message any more:
# rpm -Vvv --nofiles bash D: opening database in //var/lib/rpm/ D: verifying record number 279448 D: dependencies: looking for libc.so.5 D: dependencies: looking for libtermcap.so.2 #

This is not to say that the missing file problem is solved, just that no file verification was performed.


132

Chapter 6:Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages

6.3.9 -v -- Display Additional Information
Although RPM won't report an error with the command syntax if you include the -v option, you won't see much in the way of additional output:
# rpm -Vv bash #

Even if there are verification errors, adding -v won't change the output:
# rpm -Vv apmd S.5....T /etc/rc.d/init.d/apm S.5....T /usr/X11R6/bin/xapm #

The only time that the -v option will produce output is when the package being verified has a verification script. Any normal output from the script won't be displayed by RPM, when run without -v: 3
# rpm -V bother #

But when -v is added, the script's non-error-related output is displayed:
# rpm -Vv bother This is the bother 3.5 verification script #

If you're looking for more insight into RPM's inner workings, you'll have to try the next option:

6.3.10 -vv -- Display Debugging Information
Sometimes it's necessary to have even more information than we can get with -v. By adding another v, that's just what we'll get:
# rpm -Vvv rpm 3 Failure messages will always be displayed.


Section 6.3:Selecting What to Verify, and How

133

D: D: D: D: D: #

opening database in //var/lib/rpm/ verifying record number 2341208 dependencies: looking for libz.so.1 dependencies: looking for libdb.so.2 dependencies: looking for libc.so.5

The lines starting with D: have been added by using -vv. We can see where the RPM database is located and what record number contains information on the rpm-2.3-1 package. Following that is the list of dependencies that the rpm package requires. In the vast majority of cases, it will not be necessary to use -vv. It is normally used by software engineers working on RPM itself, and the output can change without notice. However, it's a handy way to gain insights into RPM.

6.3.11 --dbpath : Use To Find RPM Database
In order for RPM to do its handiwork, it needs access to an RPM database. Normally, this database exists in the directory specified by the rpmrc file entry, dbpath. By default, dbpath is set to /var/lib/rpm. Although the dbpath entry can be modified in the appropriate rpmrc file, the --dbpath option is probably a better choice when the database path needs to be changed temporarily. An example of a time the --dbpath option would come in handy is when it's necessary to examine an RPM database copied from another system. Granted, it's not a common occurrence, but it's difficult to handle any other way.

6.3.12 --root : Set Alternate Root to
Adding --root to a verify command forces RPM to assume that the directory specified by is actually the "root" directory. In addition, RPM expects its database to reside in the directory specified by the dbpath rpmrc file entry, relative to . 4
4 For more information on rpmrc file entries, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


134

Chapter 6:Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages

Normally this option is only used during an initial system install, or when a system has been booted off a "rescue disk", and some packages need to be re-installed in order to restore normal operation.

6.3.13 --rcfile : Set Alternate rpmrc file to
The --rcfile option is used to specify a file containing default settings for RPM. Normally, this option is not needed. By default, RPM uses /etc/rpmrc and a file named .rpmrc, located in your login directory. This option would be used if there was a need to switch between several sets of RPM options. Software developer and package builders will be the people using --rcfile. For more information on rpmrc files, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.

6.4 We've Lied to You...
Not really; we just omitted a few details until you've had a chance to see rpm -V in action. Here are the details:

6.4.1 RPM Controls What Gets Verified
Depending on the type of file being verified, RPM will not verify every possible attribute. Here is a table showing the attributes checked for each of the different file types:
Table 6­2 Verification Versus File Types

File Type

File Size

Mode

MD5 Major Minor Sym- Owner Group ModCheck- Num- Num- link ificasum ber ber String tion Time X X -

Directory File

-

X


Section 6.4:We've Lied to You...

135

Symbolic Links FIFO Devices Regular Files

-

X

-

-

-

X

X

X

-

X

X X X

X

X -

X -

-

X X X

X X X

X

The Package Builder Can Also Control What Gets Verified When a package builder creates a new package, they can control what attributes are to be verified on a file-by-file basis. The reasons for excluding specific attributes from verification can be quite involved, but here's an example just to give you the flavor: When a person logs into a system, there are device files associated with that user's terminal session. In order for the terminal device (called tty) to function properly, the owner and group of the device must change to that of the person logging in. Therefore, if RPM were to verify the package that created the tty device files, any ttys that were in use at the time would fail to verify. However, by using the %verify 5directive, a package builder can save you from trivial verification failures.
5 See The %verify Directive in Section 13.6.1 for details on %verify


136

Chapter 6:Using RPM to Verify Installed Packages


Section 7.1:rpm -K -- What Does it Do?

137

7 Using RPM to Verify Package Files
Table 7­1 rpm -K Command Syntax

rpm -K (or --checksig) options file1.rpm ... fileN.rpm Parameters file1.rpm ... fileN.rpm --nopgp One or more RPM package files (URLs OK) Page Section 7.3.5, --nopgp -- Do Not Verify Any PGP Signatures Page Section 7.3.1, -v -- Display Additional Information Section 7.3.6, -vv -- Display Debugging Information

Checksig-specific Options Do not verify PGP signatures General Options -v Display additional information Display debugging information

-vv

--rcfile

Set alternate rpmrc file to Section 7.3.7, --rcfile : Use As An Alternate rpmrc File

7.1 rpm -K -- What Does it Do?
One aspect of RPM is that you can get a package from the Internet, and easily install it. But what do you know about that package file? Is the organization listed as being the "vendor" of the package really the organization that built it? Did someone make


138

Chapter 7:Using RPM to Verify Package Files

unauthorized changes to it? Can you trust that, if installed, it won't mail a copy of your password file to a system cracker? Features built into RPM allow you to make sure that the package file you've just gotten won't cause you problems once it's installed, whether the package was corrupted by line noise when you downloaded it, or something more sinister happened to it. The command rpm -K (The option --checksig is equivalent) verifies a package file. Using this command, it is easy to make sure the file has not been changed in any way. rpm -K can also be used to make sure that the package was actually built by the organization listed as being the package's vendor. That's all very impressive, but how does it do that? Well, it just needs help from some "Pretty Good" software.

7.1.1 Pretty Good Privacy: RPM's Assistant
The "Pretty Good" software we're referring to is known as "Pretty Good Privacy", or PGP. While all the information on PGP could fill a book (or several), we've provided a quick introduction to help you get started. If PGP is new should get you the other hand, or two, you're to you, a quick glance through Appendix G, An Introduction to PGP well on your way to understanding, building, and installing PGP. If, on you've got PGP already installed and have sent an encrypted message probably more than ready to continue with this chapter.

7.2 Configuring PGP for rpm -K
Once PGP is properly built and installed, the actual configuration for RPM is trivial. Here's what needs to be done: · · PGP must be in your path. If PGP's usage message doesn't come up when you enter pgp at your shell prompt, you'll need to add PGP's directory to your path. PGP must be able to find the public keyring file that you want to use when checking package file signatures. You can use two methods to direct PGP to the public keyring: 1. Set the PGPPATH environment variable to point to the directory containing the public keyring file.


Section 7.3:Using rpm -K

139

2.

Set the pgp_path rpmrc file entry to point to the directory containing the public keyring file. 1

Now we're ready.

7.3 Using rpm -K
After all the preliminaries with PGP, it's time to get down to business. First, we need to get the package builder's public key and add it to the public keyring file used by RPM. You'll need to do this once for each package builder whose packages you'll want to check. This is what you'll need to do:
# pgp -ka RPM-PGP-KEY ./pubring.pgp Pretty Good Privacy(tm) 2.6.3a - Public-key encryption for the masses. (c) 1990-96 Philip Zimmermann, Phil's Pretty Good Software. 1996-03-04 Uses the RSAREF(tm) Toolkit, which is copyright RSA Data Security, Inc. Distributed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Export of this software may be restricted by the U.S. government. Current time: 1996/06/01 22:50 GMT Looking for new keys... pub 1024/CBA29BF9 1996/02/20 Checking signatures... Keyfile contains: 1 new key(s) One or more of the new keys are not fully certified. Do you want to certify any of these keys yourself (y/N)? n

Red Hat Software, Inc.

Here we've added Red Hat's public key, since we're going to check some package files produced by them. The file RPM-PGP-KEY contains the key. At the end, PGP asks us if we want to certify the new key. We've answered "no" since it isn't necessary to certify keys to verify package files.
1 For more information on rpmrc files, rpmrc file entries, and how to use them, please see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


140

Chapter 7:Using RPM to Verify Package Files

Next, we'll verify a package file:
# rpm -K rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm: size pgp md5 OK #

While the output might seem somewhat anti-climactic, we can now be nearly 100% certain this package: 1. 2. was produced by Red Hat. is unchanged from their original copy.

The output from this command shows that there are actually three distinct features of the package file that are checked by the -K option: 1. 2. The size message indicates that the size of the packaged files has not changed. The pgp message indicates that the digital signature contained in the package file is a valid signature of the package file contents, and was produced by the organization that originally signed the package. The md5 message indicates that a checksum contained in the package file and calculated when the package was built, matches a checksum calculated by RPM during verification. Because the two checksums match, it is unlikely that the package has been modified.

3.

The OK means that each of these tests were successful. If any had failed, the name would have been printed in parentheses. A bit later in the chapter, we'll see what happens when there are verification problems.

7.3.1 -v -- Display Additional Information
Adding v to a verification command will produce more interesting output:
# rpm -Kv rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm: Header+Archive size OK: 278686 bytes Good signature from user "Red Hat Software, Inc. ". Signature made 1996/12/24 18:37 GMT using 1024-bit key, key ID CBA29BF9


Section 7.3:Using rpm -K

141

WARNING: Because this public key is not certified with a trusted signature, it is not known with high confidence that this public key actually belongs to: "Red Hat Software, Inc. ". MD5 sum OK: 8873682c5e036a307dee87d990e75349 #

With a bit of digging, we can see that each of the three tests was performed, and each passed. The reason for that dire-sounding warning is that PGP is meant to operate without a central authority managing key distribution. PGP certifies keys based on webs of trust. For example, if an acquaintance of yours creates a public key, you can certify it by attaching your digital signature to it. Then anyone that knows and trusts you can also trust your acquaintance's public key. In this case, the key came directly from a mass-produced Red Hat Linux CDROM. If someone was trying to masquerade as Red Hat then they have certainly gone through a lot of trouble to do so. In this case, the lack of a certified public key is not a major problem, given the fact that the CDROM came directly from the Red Hat offices. 2

7.3.2 When the Package is Not Signed
As mentioned earlier, not every package you'll run across is going to be signed. If this is the case, here's what you'll see from RPM:
# rpm -K bother-3.5-1.i386.rpm bother-3.5-1.i386.rpm: size md5 OK #

Note the lack of a pgp message. The size and md5 messages indicate that the package still has size and checksum information that verified properly. In fact, all recently-produced package files will have these verification measures built in automatically. If you happen to run across an older unsigned package, you'll know it right away:
# rpm -K apmd-2.4-1.i386.rpm 2 Red Hat Software's public key is also available from their website, at http://www.redhat.com/redhat/contact.html . The RPM sources also contain the key, and are available from their FTP site at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/code/rpm.


142

Chapter 7:Using RPM to Verify Package Files

apmd-2.4-1.i386.rpm: No signature available #

Older package files had only a PGP-based signature; if that was missing, there was nothing left to verify.

7.3.3 When You Are Missing the Correct Public Key
If you happen to forget to add the right public key to RPM's keyring, you'll see the following response:
# rpm -K rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm: size (PGP) md5 OK (MISSING KEYS) #

Here the PGP in parentheses indicates that there's a problem with the signature, and the message at the end of the line (MISSING KEYS) shows what the problem is. Basically, RPM asked PGP to verify the package against a key that PGP didn't have, and PGP complained.

7.3.4 When a Package Just Doesn't Verify
Eventually it's going to happen -- you go to verify a package, and it fails. We'll look at an example of a package that fails verification a bit later. Before we do that, let's make a package that won't verify, to demonstrate how sensitive RPM's verification is. First, we made a copy of a signed package, rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm, to be specific. We called the copy rpm-2.3-1.i386-bogus.rpm. Next, using Emacs (in hexlmode, for all you Emacs buffs), we changed the first letter of the name of the system that built the original package. The file rpm-2.3-1.i386-bogus.rpm is now truly bogus: it has been changed from the original file. Although the change was a small one, it still showed up when the package file was queried. Here's a listing from the original package:
# rpm -qip rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm Name : rpm Version : 2.3 Distribution: Red Hat Linux Vanderbilt Vendor: Red Hat Software


Section 7.3:Using rpm -K

143

Release :1 Build Date: Tue Dec 24 09:07:59 1996 Install date: (none) Build Host: porky.redhat.com Group : Utilities/System Source RPM: rpm-2.3-1.src.rpm Size : 631157 Summary : Red Hat Package Manager Description : RPM is a powerful package manager, which can be used to build, install, query, verify, update, and uninstall individual software packages. A package consists of an archive of files, and package information, including name, version, and description. #

And here's the same listing from the bogus package file:
# rpm -qip rpm-2.3-1.i386-bogus.rpm Name : rpm Distribution: Red Hat Linux Vanderbilt Version : 2.3 Vendor: Red Hat Software Release :1 Build Date: Tue Dec 24 09:07:59 1996 Install date: (none) Build Host: qorky.redhat.com Group : Utilities/System Source RPM: rpm-2.3-1.src.rpm Size : 631157 Summary : Red Hat Package Manager Description : RPM is a powerful package manager, which can be used to build, install, query, verify, update, and uninstall individual software packages. A package consists of an archive of files, and package information, including name, version, and description. #

Notice that the build host name changed from porky.redhat.com to qorky.redhat.com. Using the cmp utility to compare the two files, we find that the difference occurs at byte 1201, which changed from "p" (octal 160), to "q" (octal 161):
# cmp -cl rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm rpm-2.3-1.i386-bogus.rpm 1201 160 p 161 q #


144

Chapter 7:Using RPM to Verify Package Files

People versed in octal numbers will note that only one bit has been changed in the entire file. That's the smallest possible change you can make! Let's see how our bogus friend fares:
# rpm -K rpm-2.3-1.i386-bogus.rpm rpm-2.3-1.i386-bogus.rpm: size PGP MD5 NOT OK #

Given that the command's output ends with NOT OK in big capital letters, it's obvious there's a problem. Since the word size was printed in lowercase, the bogus package's size was OK, which makes sense -- we only changed the value of one bit without adding or subtracting anything else. However, the PGP signature, printed in uppercase, didn't verify. Again, this makes sense, too. The package that was signed by Red Hat has been changed. The fact that the package's MD5 checksum also failed to verify provides further evidence that the bogus package is just that: bogus.

7.3.5 --nopgp -- Do Not Verify Any PGP Signatures
Perhaps you want to be able to verify packages but, for one reason or another, you cannot use PGP. Maybe you don't have a trustworthy source of the necessary public keys, or maybe it's illegal to possess encryption (like PGP) software in your country. Is it still possible to verify packages? Certainly -- in fact, we've already done it, in Section 7.3.3, When You Are Missing the Correct Public Key. You lose the ability to verify the package's origins, as well as some level of confidence in the package's integrity, but the size and MD5 checksums still give some measure of assurance as to the package's state. Of course, when PGP can't be used, the output from a verification always looks like something's wrong:
# rpm -K rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm: size (PGP) md5 OK (MISSING KEYS) #


Section 7.3:Using rpm -K

145

The --nopgp option directs RPM to ignore PGP entirely. If we use the --nopgp option on our example above, we find that things look a whole lot better:
# rpm -K --nopgp rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm: size md5 OK #

7.3.6 -vv -- Display Debugging Information
Nine times out of ten, you'll probably never have to use it, but if you're the curious type, the -vv option will give you insights into how RPM verifies packages. Here's an example:
# rpm -Kvv rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm D: New Header signature D: magic: 8e ad e8 01 D: got : 8e ad e8 01 D: Signature size: 236 D: Signature pad : 4 D: sigsize : 240 D: Header + Archive: 278686 D: expected size : 278686 rpm-2.3-1.i386.rpm: Header+Archive size OK: 278686 bytes Good signature from user "Red Hat Software, Inc. ". Signature made 1996/12/24 18:37 GMT using 1024-bit key, key ID CBA29BF9 WARNING: Because this public key is not certified with a trusted signature, it is not known with high confidence that this public key actually belongs to: "Red Hat Software, Inc. ". MD5 sum OK: 8873682c5e036a307dee87d990e75349 #

The lines starting with D: represent extra output produced by the -vv option. This output is normally used by software developers in the course of adding new features to RPM and is subject to change, but there's no law against looking at it. Briefly, the output shows that RPM has detected a new-style signature block, containing size, MD5 checksum, and PGP signature information. The size of the signature,


146

Chapter 7:Using RPM to Verify Package Files

the size of the package file's header and archive sections, and the expected size of those sections are all displayed.

7.3.7 --rcfile : Use As An Alternate rpmrc File
The --rcfile option is used to specify a file containing default settings for RPM. Normally, this option is not needed. By default, RPM uses /etc/rpmrc and a file named .rpmrc located in your login directory. This option would be used if there was a need to switch between several sets of RPM defaults. Software developers and package builders will normally be the only people using the --rcfile option. For more information on rpmrc files, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


Section 8.1:Other RPM Options

147

8 Miscellania
As with any other large, complex subject, there are always some leftovers -- things that just don't seem to fit in any one category. RPM is no exception. This chapter covers those aspects of RPM that can only be called "miscellania"...

8.1 Other RPM Options
The following options are not normally used on a day to day basis. However, some of them can be quite important when the need arises. One such option is --rebuilddb.

8.1.1 --rebuilddb -- Rebuild RPM database
We all hope the day never comes, and for many of us, it never does. But still, there is a chance that one day, while you're busy using RPM to install or upgrade a package, you'll see this message:
free list corrupt (42)- contact rpm-list@redhat.com

Once this happens, you'll find there's very little that you can do, RPM-wise. However, before you fire off an e-mail to the RPM mailing list, you might try the --rebuilddb option. The format of the command is simple:
rpm --rebuilddb

The command produces no output, either. After a few minutes, it completes with nary a peep. Here's an example of --rebuilddb being used on an RPM database that wasn't corrupt. First, let's look at the files that comprise the database:
# cd /var/lib/rpm # ls total 3534 -rw-r--r-1 root 1 root -rw-r--r--rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root

root root root root root

1351680 16384 16384 2342536 16384

Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct

17 17 17 17 17

10:35 10:35 10:35 10:35 10:35

fileindex.rpm groupindex.rpm nameindex.rpm packages.rpm providesindex.rpm


148

Chapter 8:Miscellania

-rw-r--r-#

1 root

root

16384 Oct 17 10:35 requiredby.rpm

Then, we issue the command:
# rpm --rebuilddb #

After a few minutes, the command completes, and we take a look at the files again:
# ls total 3531 -rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r-# 1 1 1 1 1 1 root root root root root root root root root root root root 1351680 16384 16384 2339080 16384 16384 Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct 17 17 17 17 17 17 20:50 20:50 20:50 20:50 20:50 20:50 fileindex.rpm groupindex.rpm nameindex.rpm packages.rpm providesindex.rpm requiredby.rpm

You'll note that packages.rpm decreased in size. This is due to a side-effect of the --rebuilddb option -- While it is going through the database, it is getting rid of unused portions of the database. Our example was performed on a newly installed system where only one or two packages had been upgraded, so the reduction in size was small. For a system that has been through a complete upgrade, the difference would be more dramatic. Does this mean that you should rebuild the database every once in a while? Not really. Since RPM eventually will make use of the holes, there's no major advantage to regular rebuilds. However, when an RPM-based system has undergone a major upgrade, it certainly wouldn't hurt to spend a few minutes using --rebuilddb to clean things up.

8.1.2 --initdb -- Create a New RPM Database
If you are already using RPM, the --initdb option is one you'll probably never have to use. The --initdb option is used to create a new RPM database. That's


Section 8.1:Other RPM Options

149

why you'll probably not need it if you're already using RPM -- you already have an RPM database. It might seem that the --initdb option would be dangerous. After all, won't it trash your current database if you mistakenly use it? Fortunately, the answer is no. If there is an RPM database in place already, it's still perfectly safe to use the option, even though it won't accomplish much. As an example, here's a listing of the files that make up the RPM database on a Red Hat Linux system:
# ls /var/lib/rpm total 3559 -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root # root root root root root root root 16384 1351680 16384 16384 2349640 16384 16384 Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 22:10 22:10 22:10 22:10 22:10 22:10 22:10 conflictsindex.rpm fileindex.rpm groupindex.rpm nameindex.rpm packages.rpm providesindex.rpm requiredby.rpm

Next, let's use the --initdb option, just to see what it does to this database:
# rpm --initdb # ls /var/lib/rpm total 3559 -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root #

root root root root root root root

16384 1351680 16384 16384 2349640 16384 16384

Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan

8 8 8 8 8 8 8

22:10 22:10 22:10 22:10 22:10 22:10 22:10

conflictsindex.rpm fileindex.rpm groupindex.rpm nameindex.rpm packages.rpm providesindex.rpm requiredby.rpm

Since an RPM database existed already, the --initdb option did no harm to it -- there was no change to the database files. The only other option that can be used with --initdb is --dbpath. This permits the easy creation of a new RPM database in the directory specified with the --dbpath option.


150

Chapter 8:Miscellania

8.1.3 --quiet -- Produce as little output as possible
Adding the --quiet option to any RPM command directs RPM to produce as little output as possible. For example, RPM's build command (the subject of the second half of this book) normally produces reams of output; by adding the --quiet option, this is all you'll see:
# * 1 3 # rpm -ba --quiet bother-3.5.spec Package: bother block blocks

The --quiet option can silence even the mighty -vv option:
# rpm -Uvv --quiet eject-1.2-2.i386.rpm #

8.1.4 --help -- Display a help message
RPM includes a concise built-in help message for those times when you need a reminder about a particular command. Normally you'll want to use the --help option by itself, though you might want to pipe the output through a pager such as less, since the output is more than one screen long:
# rpm --help|less RPM version 2.3 Copyright (C) 1995 - Red Hat Software This may be freely redistributed under the terms of the GNU Public License usage: --help --version - print all modes support the --rcfile -v -vv -q --root

- print this message the version of rpm being used following arguments: - use instead of /etc/rpmrc and $HOME/.rpmrc - be a little more verbose - be incredibly verbose (for debugging) - query mode - use as the top level directory


Section 8.2:Using rpm2cpio

151

--dbpath - use as the directory for the database --queryformat - use s as the header format (implies -i) install, upgrade and query (with -p) allow ftp URL's to be used in place of file names as well as the following options: --ftpproxy --ftpport - hostname or IP of ftp proxy - port number of ftp server (or proxy)

This is just the first screen of RPM's help command. To see the rest, give the command a try. Practically everything there is to know about RPM is present in the --help output. It's a bit too concise to learn RPM from, but it's enough to refresh your memory when the syntax of a particular option escapes you.

8.1.5 --version -- Display the current RPM version
If you're not sure what version of RPM is presently installed on your system, the easiest way to find out is to ask RPM itself using the --version option:
# rpm --version RPM version 2.3 #

8.2 Using rpm2cpio
From time to time, you might find it necessary to extract one or more files from a package file. One way to do this would be to: · · · Install the package Make a copy of the file(s) you need Erase the package

An easier way would be to use rpm2cpio.


152

Chapter 8:Miscellania

8.2.1 rpm2cpio -- What does it do?
As the name implies, rpm2cpio takes an RPM package file and converts it to a cpio archive. Because it's written to be used primarily as a filter, there's not much to be specified. rpm2cpio takes only only one argument, and even that's optional! The optional argument is the name of the package file to be converted. If there is no filename specified on the command line, rpm2cpio will simply read from standard input and convert that to a cpio archive. Let's give it a try:
# rpm2cpio logrotate-1.0-1.i386.rpm 0707020001a86a000081a4000000000000000000000001313118bb000002c200000008000 000030000000000000000000000190000e73eusr/man/man8/logrotate.8." logrotate - log fi le rotator .TH rpm 8 "28 November 1995" "Red Hat Software" "Red Hat Linux" .SH NAME

(We've just shown the first few lines of output.) What on earth is all that stuff? Remember, rpm2cpio is written as a filter. It writes the cpio archive contained in the package file to standard output, which, if you've not redirected it somehow, is your screen. Here's a more reasonable example:
# rpm2cpio logrotate-1.0-1.i386.rpm > blah.cpio # file blah.cpio blah.cpio: ASCII cpio archive (SVR4 with CRC) #

Here we've directed rpm2cpio to convert the logrotate package file. We've also redirected rpm2cpio's output to a file called blah.cpio. Next, using the file command, we find that the resulting file is indeed a true-blue cpio archive file. The following command is entirely equivalent to the one above and shows rpm2cpio's ability to read the package file from its standard input:
# cat logrotate-1.0-1.i386.rpm | rpm2cpio > blah.cpio #


Section 8.2:Using rpm2cpio

153

8.2.2 A more real-world example -- Listing the files in a package file
While there's nothing wrong with using rpm2cpio to actually create a cpio archive file, it's takes a few more steps and uses a bit more disk space than is strictly necessary. A somewhat cleaner approach would be to pipe rpm2cpio's output directly into cpio:
# rpm2cpio logrotate-1.0-1.i386.rpm usr/man/man8/logrotate.8 usr/sbin/logrotate 14 blocks # | cpio -t

In this example, we used the -t option to direct cpio to produce a "table of contents" of the archive created by rpm2cpio. This can make it much easier to get the right filename and path when you want to extract a file.

8.2.3 Extracting one or more files from a package file
Continuing the example above, let's extract the man page from the logrotate package. In the table of contents, we see that the full path is usr/man/man8/logrotate.8. All we need to do is to use the filename and path as shown below:
# rpm2cpio logrotate-1.0-1.i386.rpm |cpio -ivd usr/man/man8/logrotate.8 usr/man/man8/logrotate.8 14 blocks #

In this case, the cpio options -i, -v, and -d direct cpio to: · · Extract one or more files from an archive. Display the names of any files processed, along with the size of the archive file, in 512-byte blocks. 1

1 Note that the size displayed by cpio is the size of the cpio archive and not the package file.


154

Chapter 8:Miscellania

·

Create any directories that precede the filename specified in the cpio command.

So where did the file end up? The last option (-d) to cpio provides a hint. Let's take a look:
# ls -al total 5 -rw-rw-r-1 root root drwx-----3 root root # cd usr # ls -al total 1 drwx-----3 root root # cd man # ls -al total 1 drwx-----2 root root # cd man8 # ls -al total 1 -rw-r--r-1 root root # cat logrotate.8 .\" logrotate - log file rotator .TH rpm 8 "28 November 1995" "Red Hat .SH NAME logrotate \- log file rotator .SH SYNOPSIS \fBlogrotate\fP [configfiles] .SH DESCRIPTION \fBlogrotate\fP is a tool to prevent ... # 3918 May 30 11:02 logrotate-1.0-1.i386.rpm 1024 Jul 14 12:42 usr

1024 Jul 14 12:42 man

1024 Jul 14 12:42 man8

706 Jul 14 12:42 logrotate.8

Software" "Red Hat Linux"

log files from growing without

Since the current directory didn't have a usr/man/man8/ path in it, the -d option caused cpio to create all the directories leading up to the logrotate.8 file in the current directory. Based on this, it's probably safest to use cpio outside the normal system directories unless you're comfortable with cpio, and you know what you're doing!


Section 8.3:Source Package Files and How To Use Them

155

8.3 Source Package Files and How To Use Them
One day, you may run across a package file with a name similar to the following:
etcskel-1.0-3.src.rpm

Notice the src. Is that a new kind of computer? If you use RPM on an Intel-based computer, you'd normally expect to find i386 there. Maybe someone messed up the name of the file. Well, we know that the file command can display information about a package file, even if the filename has been changed. We've used it before to figure out what package a file contains:
# file foo.bar foo.bar: RPM v2 bin i386 eject-1.2-2 #

In this example, foo.bar is an RPM version 2 file, containing an executable package -- hence, the "bin" -- built for Intel processors -- the "i386". The package is eject version 1.2, release 2. Let's try the file command on this mystery file and see what we can find out about it:
# file etcskel-1.0-3.src.rpm etcskel-1.0-3.src.rpm: RPM v2 src i386 etcskel-1.0-3 #

Well, it's a package file all right -- for version 1.0, release 3 of the etcskel package. It's in RPM version 2 format, and built for Intel-based systems. But what does the "src" mean?

8.3.1 A gentle introduction to source code
This package file contains not the executable, or "binary", files that a normal package contains, but rather the "source" files required to create those binaries. When programmers create a new program, they write the instructions, often called "code",


156

Chapter 8:Miscellania

in one or more files. The source code is then compiled into a binary that can be executed by the computer. As part of the process of building package files (a process we cover in great detail in the second half of this book), two types of package files are created: 1. 2. The binary, or executable, package file The source package file

The source package contains everything needed to recreate not only the programs and associated files that are contained in the binary package file, but the binary and source package files themselves.

8.3.2 Do you really need more information than this?
The following discussion is going to get rather technical. Unless you're the type of person who likes to take other people's code and modify it, chances are you won't need much more information than this. But if you're still interested, let's explore further.

8.3.3 So what can I do with it?
In the case of source package files, one of the things that can be done with them is that they can be installed. Let's try an install of a source package:
# rpm -i cdp-0.33-3.src.rpm #

Well that doesn't tell us very much and, take our word for it, adding -v doesn't improve the situation appreciably. Let's haul out the big guns and try -vv:
# rpm -ivv cdp-0.33-3.src.rpm D: installing cdp-0.33-3.src.rpm Installing cdp-0.33-3.src.rpm D: package is a source package major = 2 D: installing a source package D: sources in: ///usr/src/redhat/SOURCES D: spec file in: ///usr/src/redhat/SPECS D: file "cdp-0.33-cdplay.patch" complete D: file "cdp-0.33-fsstnd.patch" complete


Section 8.3:Source Package Files and How To Use Them

157

D: file "cdp-0.33.spec" complete D: file "cdp-0.33.tgz" complete D: renaming ///usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdp-0.33.spec to ///usr/src/redhat/SPECS/cdp-0.33.spec #

What does this output tell us? Well, RPM recognizes that the file is a source package. It mentions that sources (we know what they are) are in /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES. Let's take a look:
# ls -al /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ -rw-rw-r-1 root root -rw-r--r-1 root root -rw-r--r-1 root root # 364 Apr 24 22:35 cdp-0.33-cdplay.patch 916 Jan 8 12:07 cdp-0.33-fsstnd.patch 148916 Nov 10 1995 cdp-0.33.tgz

There are some files that seem to be related to cdp there. The two files ending with ".patch" are patches to the source. RPM permits patches to be processed when building binary packages. The patches are bundled along with the original, unmodified sources in the source package. The last file is a gzipped tar file. If you've gotten software off the Internet, you're probably familiar with tar files, gzipped or not. If we look inside the file, we should see all the usual kinds of things: README files, a Makefile or two, and some source code:
# tar ztf cdp-0.33.tgz cdp-0.33/COPYING cdp-0.33/ChangeLog cdp-0.33/INSTALL cdp-0.33/Makefile cdp-0.33/README cdp-0.33/cdp cdp-0.33/cdp-0.33.lsm cdp-0.33/cdp.1 cdp-0.33/cdp.1.Z cdp-0.33/cdp.c cdp-0.33/cdp.h #


158

Chapter 8:Miscellania

There's more, but you get the idea. OK, so there are the sources. But what is that "spec" file mentioned in the output? It mentions something about "/usr/src/redhat/SPECS", so let's see what we have in that directory:
# ls -al /usr/src/redhat/SPECS -rw-r--r-1 root root 397 Apr 24 22:36 cdp-0.33.spec

Without making a long story too short, a spec file contains information used by RPM to create the binary and source packages. Using the spec file, RPM: · · · · · · Unpacks the sources. Applies patches (if any exist). Builds the software. Creates the binary package file. Creates the source package file. Cleans up after itself.

The neatest part of this is that RPM does this all automatically, under the control of the spec file. That's about all we're going to say about how RPM builds packages. For more information, please refer to the second half of this book.

8.3.4 Stick with us!
As we've noted several times, we'll be covering the entire subject of building packages with RPM, in the second half of the book. Be forewarned, however: Package building, while straightforward, is not a task for people new to programming. But if you've written a program or two, you'll probably find RPM's package building a piece of cake.


Part II RPM and Developers -- How to Distribute Your Software More Easily With RPM



Section 9.1:Pristine Sources

161

9 The Philosophy Behind RPM
As we saw in the first half of this book, RPM can make life much easier for the user. With automated installs, upgrades, and erasures, RPM can take a lot of the guesswork out of keeping a computer system up-to-date. But what about people that sling code for a living? Does RPM have anything to offer them? The answer is yes! One of the best things about RPM is that although it was designed to make life easier for users, it was written by people that would be using it to build many packages. So the design philosophy of RPM has a definite bias toward making life easier for developers. Here are some of the reasons you should consider building packages with RPM:

9.1 Pristine Sources
While many developers might use RPM to package their own software, just as many, if not more, are going to be packaging software that they have not written. Because of this, there are some aspects to RPM's design that are geared toward "third-party" package builders. One such aspect is RPM's use of "pristine" sources. When a third-party package builder decides to package someone else's software, they often get the software from the Net, normally as a tar file compressed with something like GNU zip. That's probably about the only generalization we can make when talking about software that is eligible for packaging. Once we look inside the tar file, there are a world of possible differences: · · · The application could be available in pure source form, in pure binary form, or some combination of both. The application might have been written to be built using make, imake, or a script included with the sources. Or, it might have to be built entirely by hand. The application might need to be configured prior to use. Maybe it uses GNU configure, a custom configuration script, or one or more files that need to be edited to reflect the target environment. The application might have been written to reside in specific directories, and those directories do not exist, or are not appropriate on the target system.

·


162

Chapter 9:The Philosophy Behind RPM

·

The application might not even support the target environment, requiring all manner of changes to port it to the target environment.

We could go on, but you probably get the idea. It's a rare application that comes off the Net ready to package, and the changes required vary widely. What to do? This is where the concept of pristine sources comes in. RPM has been designed to use the sources as they come from the application's developer, no matter how it has been packaged and configured. The main benefit is that the changes you as a package builder need to make, remain separate from the original sources, in a distinct collection of patches. This may not sound like much of an advantage, but consider how this would work if a new version of the application came out. If the new version had a few localized bug fixes, it's entirely possible the original patches could be applied, and a new package built, with a single RPM command. Even if the patches didn't apply cleanly, it would at least give an indication as to what might need to be done to get the new version built and packaged. If your users sometimes customize packages, having pristine sources makes it easier for them, too. They can see what patches you've created and can easily add their own. Another benefit to using pristine sources is that it makes keeping track of multiple versions of a package simple. Instead of keeping patched sources around, or battling a revision control system, it's only necessary to keep: · · · The original sources in their tar file. A copy of the patches you applied to get the application to build. A file used by RPM to control the package building process.

With these three items, it's possible to easily build the package at any time. Keeping track of multiple versions only entails keeping track of each version of these three components, rather than hundreds or thousands of patched source files. In fact, it gets better than that. RPM can also build a source package containing these three components. The source package, named using RPM's standard naming


Section 9.2:Easy Builds

163

convention, keeps everything you need to recreate a specific version of a package, in one uniquely named file. Keeping track of multiple versions of multiple packages is simply a matter of keeping the appropriate source packages around. Everything else can be built from them.

9.2 Easy Builds
RPM makes it easy to build packages. Just as with the use of pristine sources, the fact that the build process is simple is an even greater advantage to the third-party package builders responsible for many packages, than it is to a one-package software development house. But in either case, RPM's ease of building is a welcome relief. The following sections document some of the ways that RPM makes building packages a straightforward process.

9.2.1 Reproducible Builds
One of the biggest problems facing developers is reproducing a particular build. This single problem is the main reason so much effort is put into creating and deploying version control systems to manage sources. While RPM cannot compete with a full-blown revision control system, it does an excellent job of keeping in one place everything required to build a particular version of a package. Remember the source package we mentioned above? With one command, RPM can open the package, extract the sources, patch them, perform a build, and create a new binary package, ready for your users. The best part is that the binary package will be the same every time you build it because everything needed to create it is kept in one source package.

9.2.2 Unattended Builds
As we mentioned above, completely building a package takes only one RPM command. This makes it easy to set up automated build procedures that can build one hundred packages as easily as one. Anything from a single package consisting of one application to the several hundred packages that comprise an entire operating system, can be built automatically using RPM.


164

Chapter 9:The Philosophy Behind RPM

9.3 Multi-architecture/operating system Support
It has always been a fact of life for software developers that their applications may need to be ported to multiple operating systems. It is also becoming more common that a particular operating system might run on several different platforms, or architectures. RPM's ability to support multiple architectures and operating systems makes it easy to build the same package for many OS/platform combinations. A package may be configured to build on only one architecture/OS combination, or on several. The only limitation is the application's portability.

9.4 Easier For Your Users
While we are primarily concerned with RPM's advantages from the developer's point of view, it's worth looking at RPM from the user's standpoint for a moment. After all, if RPM makes life easier for your users, that can translate into lower support costs.

9.4.1 Easy Upgrades
Probably the biggest headache for user and developer alike is the upgrade of an application, or worse yet, an entire operating system! RPM can make upgrading a one-step process. With one command, a new package can be installed, and the remnants of the old package removed.

9.4.2 Intelligent Configuration File Handling
Configuration files -- nearly every application has them. They may go by different names, but they all control the behavior of their application. Users normally customize config files to their liking and would be upset if their customizations were lost during the installation, upgrade, or removal of a package. RPM takes special care with a user's config files. By using MD5 checksums, RPM can determine what action is most appropriate with a config file. If a config file has been modified by the user and has to be replaced, it is saved. That way a user's modifications are never lost.


Section 9.5:To Summarize...

165

9.4.3 Powerful Query Capabilities
RPM uses a database to keep track of all files it installs. RPM's database provides other benefits, such as the wide variety of information that can be easily retrieved from it. RPM's query command makes it easy for users to quickly answer a number of questions, such as: · · · Where did this file come from? Is it part of a package? What does this package do? What packages are installed on my system?

These are just a few examples of the many ways RPM can provide information about one or more packages on a user's system.

9.4.4 Easy Package Verification
Another way that RPM leverages the information stored in its database, is by providing an easy way to verify that a package is properly installed. With this capability, RPM makes it easy to determine, for example, what packages were damaged by a wildcard delete in /usr/bin. In addition, RPM's verification command can detect changes to file attributes, such as a file's permissions, ownership, and size.

9.5 To Summarize...
RPM was written by developers for developers. It makes building packages as easy as possible, even if the software being packaged hasn't been developed in-house. In addition, RPM presents some significant advantages to users, thereby reducing support needs. In the next chapter, we'll introduce the basic concepts of package building with RPM.


166

Chapter 9:The Philosophy Behind RPM


Section 10.1:The Inputs

167

10

The Basics of Developing With RPM

Now that we've seen the design philosophy of RPM, let's look at the nuts and bolts of RPM's build process. Building a package is similar to compiling code -- there are inputs, an engine that does the dirty work, and outputs.

10.1 The Inputs
There are three different kinds of inputs that are used to drive RPM's build process. Two of the three inputs are required, and the third, strictly speaking, is optional. But unless you're packaging your own code, chances are you'll need it.

10.1.1 The Sources
First and foremost, are the sources. After all, without them, there wouldn't be much to build! In the case of packaging someone else's software, the sources should be kept as the author distributed them, which usually means a compressed tar file. RPM can handle other archive formats, but a bit more up-front effort is required. In any case, you should not modify the sources used in the package building process. If you're a third-party package builder, that means the sources should be just the way you got them from the author's FTP site. If it's your own software, the choice is up to you, but you should consider starting with your mainstream sources.

10.1.2 The Patches
Why all the emphasis on unmodified sources? Because RPM gives you the ability to automatically apply patches to them. Usually, the nature of these patches falls into one of the following categories: · The patch addresses an issue specific to the target system. This could include changing makefiles to install the application into the appropriate directories, or resolving cross-platform conflicts, such as replacing BSD system calls with their SYSV counterparts. The patch creates files that are normally created during a configuration step in the installation process. Many times, it's necessary to either edit configuration files

·


168

Chapter 10:The Basics of Developing With RPM

or scripts in order to set things up for compilation. In other cases, a configuration utility needs to be run before the sources are compiled. In either instance, the patches create the environment required for proper compilation. Creating the Patches While it might sound a bit daunting to take into account the types of patches outlined above, it's really quite simple. Here's how it's done: 1. 2. 3. Unpack the sources. Rename the top-level directory. Make it end with ".orig", for example. Unpack the sources again, leaving the top-level directory name unchanged.

The source tree that you created the second time will be the one you'll use to get the software to build. If the software builds with no changes required, that's great -- you won't need a patch. But if you had to make any changes, you'll have to create a set of patches. To do so, simply clean the source directory of any binaries. Then, issue a recursive diff command to compare the source tree you used for the build, against the original, unmodified source tree. It's as easy as that!

10.1.3 The Spec File
The spec file is at the heart of RPM's packaging building process. Similar in concept to a makefile, it contains information required by RPM to build the package, as well as instructions telling RPM how to build it. The spec file also dictates exactly what files are a part of the package, and where they should be installed. As you might imagine, with this many responsibilities, the spec file format can be a bit complex. However, it's broken into several sections, making it easier to handle. All told, there are eight sections: The Preamble The preamble contains information that will be displayed when users request information about the package. This would include a description of the package's function, the version number of the software, and so on. Also contained in the preamble


Section 10.1:The Inputs

169

are lines identifying sources, patches, and even an icon to be used if the package is manipulated by graphical interface. The Prep Section The prep section is where the actual work of building a package starts. As the name implies, this section is where the necessary preparations are made prior to the actual building of the software. In general, if anything needs to be done to the sources prior to building the software, it needs to happen in the prep section. Usually, this boils down to unpacking the sources. The contents of this section are an ordinary shell script. However, RPM does provide two macros to make life easier. One macro can unpack a compressed tar file and cd into the source directory. The other macro easily applies patches to the unpacked sources. The Build Section Like the prep section, the build section consists of a shell script. As you might guess, this section is used to perform whatever commands are required to actually compile the sources. This section could consist of a single make command, or be more complex if the build process requires it. Since most software is built today using make, there are no macros available in this section. The Install Section Also containing a shell script, the install section is used to perform the commands required to actually install the software. If the software's author added an install target in the makefile, this section might only consist of a make install command. Otherwise, you'll need to add the usual assortment of cp, mv, or install commands to get the job done. Install and Uninstall Scripts While the previous sections contained either information required by RPM to build the package, or the actual commands to do the deed, this section is different. It consists of scripts that will be run, on the user's system, when the package is actually installed or removed. RPM can execute a script: · Prior to the package being installed.


170

Chapter 10:The Basics of Developing With RPM

· · ·

After the package has been installed. Prior to the package being erased. After the package has been erased.

One example of when this capability would be required is when a package contains shared libraries. In this case, ldconfig would need to be run after the package is installed or erased. As another example, if a package contains a shell, the file /etc/shells would need to be updated appropriately when the package was installed or erased. The Verify Script This is another script that is executed on the user's system. It is executed when RPM verifies the package's proper installation. While RPM does most of the work verifying packages, this script can be used to verify aspects of the package that are beyond RPM's capabilities. The Clean Section Another script that can be present is a script that can clean things up after the build. This script is rarely used, since RPM normally does a good job of clean-up in most build environments. The File List The last section consists of a list of files that will comprise the package. Additionally, a number of macros can be used to control file attributes when installed, as well as to denote which files are documentation, and which contain configuration information. The file list is very important -- if it is missing, no package will be built.

10.2 The Engine: RPM
At the center of the action is RPM. It performs a number of steps during the build process: · · Executes the commands and macros in the prep section of the spec file. Checks the contents of the file list.


Section 10.3:The Outputs

171

· · · ·

Executes the commands and macros in the build section of the spec file. Executes the commands and macros in the install section of the spec file. Any macros in the file list are executed at this time, too. Creates the binary package file. Creates the source package file.

By using different options on the RPM command line, the build process can be stopped at any of the steps above. This makes the initial building of a package that much easier, as it is then possible to see whether each step completed successfully before continuing on to the next step.

10.3 The Outputs
The end product of this entire process is a source package file and a binary package file.

10.3.1 The Source Package File
The source package file is a specially formatted archive that contains the following files: · · · The original compressed tar file(s). The spec file. The patches.

Since the source package contains everything needed to create the binary package, the source package, and provide the original sources, it's a great way to distribute source code. As mentioned earlier, it's also a great way to archive all the information needed to rebuild a particular version of the package.

10.3.2 The Binary RPM
The binary package file is the one part of the entire RPM building process that is most visible to the user. It contains the files that comprise the application, along with


172

Chapter 10:The Basics of Developing With RPM

any additional information needed to install and erase it. The binary package file is where the "rubber hits the road."

10.4 And Now...
Now that we've seen, in broad brush terms, the way RPM builds packages, let's take a look at an actual build. The next chapter will do just that, showing how simple it can be to build a package.


Section 11.1:Creating the Build Directory Structure

173

11

Building Packages: A Simple Example

In the previous chapter, we looked at RPM's build process from a conceptual level. In this chapter, we will be performing an actual build using RPM. In order to keep things understandable for this first pass, the build will be very simple. Once we've covered the basics, we'll present more real-world examples in later chapters.

11.1 Creating the Build Directory Structure
RPM requires a set of directories in which to perform the build. While the directories' locations and names can be changed, unless there's a reason to do so, it's best to use the default layout. Note that if you've installed RPM, the build directories are most likely in place already. The normal directory layout consists of a single top-level directory (The default name is /usr/src/redhat), with five subdirectories. The five subdirectories and their functions are: · · · · · /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES -- Contains the original sources, patches, and icon files. /usr/src/redhat/SPECS -- Contains the spec files used to control the build process. /usr/src/redhat/BUILD -- The directory in which the sources are unpacked, and the software is built. /usr/src/redhat/RPMS -- Contains the binary package files created by the build process. /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS -- Contains the source package files created by the build process.

In general, there are no special requirements that need to be met when creating these directories. In fact, the only important requirement is that the BUILD directory be part of a filesystem with sufficient free space to build the largest package expected. Here is a directory listing showing a typical build directory tree:


174

Chapter 11:Building Packages: A Simple Example

# ls -lF /usr/src/redhat total 5 drwxr-xr-x 3 root drwxr-xr-x 3 root drwxr-xr-x 4 root drwxr-xr-x 2 root drwxr-xr-x 2 root #

root root root root root

1024 1024 1024 1024 1024

Aug 5 13:12 BUILD/ Jul 17 17:51 RPMS/ Aug 4 22:31 SOURCES/ Aug 5 13:12 SPECS/ Aug 4 22:28 SRPMS/

Now that we have the directories ready to go, it's time to prepare for the build. For the remainder of this chapter, we'll be building a fictional piece of software known as cdplayer. 1

11.2 Getting the Sources
The first thing we need to do in order to build a package for cdplayer, is to obtain the sources. Being avid cdplayer fans from way back, we know that the latest source can be found at GnomoVision's FTP site, so we go get a copy. We now have a gzipped tar file of cdplayer version 1.0 on our system. After putting a copy in the SOURCES directory, we're ready to tell RPM what to do with it.

11.3 Creating the Spec File
The way we direct RPM in the build process is to create a spec file. As we saw in the previous chapter, the spec file contains eight different sections, most of which are required. Let's go through each section and create cdplayer's spec file as we go.

11.3.1 The Preamble
The preamble contains a wealth of information about the package being built, and the people that built it. Here's cdplayer's preamble:
# # Example spec file for cdplayer app... # 1 In reality, this software is a mercilessly hacked version of cdp, which was written by Sariel Har-Peled. The software was hacked to provide a simple example package, and in no way represents the fine work done by Sariel on cdp.


Section 11.3:Creating the Spec File

175

Summary: A CD player app that rocks! Name: cdplayer Version: 1.0 Release: 1 Copyright: GPL Group: Applications/Sound Source: ftp://ftp.gnomovision.com/pub/cdplayer/cdplayer-1.0.tgz URL: http://www.gnomovision.com/cdplayer/cdplayer.html Distribution: WSS Linux Vendor: White Socks Software, Inc. Packager: Santa Claus %description It slices! It dices! It's a CD player app that can't be beat. By using the resonant frequency of the CD itself, it is able to simulate 20X oversampling. This leads to sound quality that cannot be equaled with more mundane software...

In general, the preamble consists of entries, one per line, that start with a tag followed by a colon, and then some information. For example, the line starting with "Summary:" gives a short description of the packaged software that can be displayed by RPM. The order of the lines is not important, as long as they appear in the preamble. Let's take a look at each line and see what function it performs: Name The name line defines what the package will actually be called. In general, it's a good idea to use the name of the software. The name will also be included in the package label, and the package filename. Version The version line should be set to the version of the software being packaged. The version will also be included in the package label, and the package filename. Release The release is a number that is used to represent the number of times the software, at the present version, has been packaged. You can think of it as the package's version number. The release is also part of the package label and package filename.


176

Chapter 11:Building Packages: A Simple Example

Copyright The copyright line is used to hold the packaged software's copyright information. This makes it easy to determine which packages can be freely redistributed, and which cannot. In our case, cdplayer is made available under the terms of the GNU General Public License, so we've put GPL on the line. Group The group line is used to hold a string that defines how the packaged software should be grouped with other packages. The string consists of a series of words separated by slashes. From left to right, the words describe the packaged software more explicitly. We grouped cdplayer under Applications, because it is an application, and then under Sound, since it is an application that is sound-related. Source The source line serves two purposes: · · To document where the packaged software's sources can be found. To give the name of the source file as it exists in the SOURCES subdirectory.

In our example, the cdplayer sources are contained in the file cdplayer1.0.tgz, which is available from ftp.gnomovision.com, in the directory /pub/cdplayer. RPM actually ignores everything prior to the last filename in the source line, so the first part of the source string could be anything you'd like. Traditionally, the source line usually contains a Uniform Resource Locator, or URL. URL The URL line is used to contain a URL, like the source line. How are they different? While the source line is used to provide the source filename to RPM, the URL line points to documentation for the software being packaged. Distribution The distribution line contains the name of the product which the packaged software is a part of. In the Linux world, the operating system is often packaged together


Section 11.3:Creating the Spec File

177

into a "distribution", hence the name. Since we're using a fictional application in this example, we've filled in the distribution line with the name of a fictional distribution. There's no requirement that the spec file contain a distribution line, so individuals will probably omit this. Vendor The vendor line identifies the organization that distributes the software. Maintaining our fictional motif, we've invented fictional company, White Socks Software, to add to our spec file. Individuals will probably omit this as well. Packager The packager line is used to identify the organization that actually packaged the software, as opposed to the author of the software. In our example, we've chosen the greatest packager of them all, Santa Claus, to work at White Socks Software. Note that we've included contact information, in the form of an e-mail address. Description The description line is a bit different, in that it starts with a percent sign. It is also different because the information can take up more than one line. It is used to provide a more detailed description of the packaged software than the summary line. A Comment on Comments At the top of the spec file, there are three lines, each starting with a pound sign. These are comments and can be sprinkled throughout the spec file to make it more easily understood.

11.3.2 The %prep Section
With the preamble, we provided a wealth of information. The majority of this information is meant for human consumption. Only the name, version, release, and source lines have a direct bearing on the package building process. However, in the %prep section, the focus is entirely on directing RPM through the process of preparing the software for building. It is in the %prep section that the build environment for the software is created, starting with removing the remnants of any previous builds. Following this, the source


178

Chapter 11:Building Packages: A Simple Example

archive is expanded. Here is what the %prep section looks like in our example spec file:
%prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_DIR/cdplayer-1.0 zcat $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvf -

If the %prep section looks like a script, that's because it is. Any sh constructs can be used here, including expansion of environment variables (Like the $RPM_BUILD_DIR variable defined by RPM), and piping the output of zcat through tar. 2 In this case, we perform a recursive delete in the build directory to remove any old builds. We then uncompress the gzipped tar file, and extract its contents into the build directory. Quite often, the sources may require patching in order to build properly. The %prep section is the appropriate place to patch the sources, but in this example, no patching is required. Fear not, however, as we'll explore patching in all its glory in Chapter 20, Real-World Package Building, when we build a more complex package. Making Life Easier With Macros While the %prep section as we've described it isn't that difficult to understand, RPM provides macros to make life even easier. In this simple example, there's precious little that can be made easier, but macros will prevent a wealth of headaches when it's time to build more complex packages. The macro we'll introduce here is the %setup macro. The average gzipped tar file is %setup's stock in trade. Like the hand-crafted %prep section we described above, it cleans up old build trees and then uncompresses and extracts the files from the original source. While %setup has a number of options that we'll cover in later chapters, for now all we need for a %prep section is:
%prep %setup 2 For more information on the environment variables used in the build-time scripts, please refer to Section 13.3.1, Build-time Scripts.


Section 11.3:Creating the Spec File

179

That is simpler than our %prep section, so let's use the %setup macro instead. The %setup macro has a number of options to handle many different situations. For more information on this and other macros, please see Section 13.4, Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders. In our example here, the %prep section is complete. Next comes the actual build.

11.3.3 The %build Section
Not surprisingly, the part of the spec file that is responsible for performing the build, is the %build section. Like the %prep section, the %build section is an ordinary sh script. Unlike the %prep section, there are no macros. The reason for this is that the process of building software is either going to be very easy, or highly complicated. In either case, macros won't help much. In our example, the build process is simple:
%build make

Thanks to the make utility, only one command is necessary to build the cdplayer application. In the case of an application with more esoteric build requirements, the %build section could get a bit more interesting.

11.3.4 The %install Section
The %install section is executed as a sh script, just like %prep and %build. If the application is built with make and has an "install" target, the %install section will also be straightforward. The cdplayer application is a good example of this:
%install make install

If the application doesn't have a means of automatically installing itself, it will be necessary to create a script to do so, and place it in the %install section.


180

Chapter 11:Building Packages: A Simple Example

11.3.5 The %files Section
The %files section is different from the others, in that it contains a list of the files that are part of the package. Always remember -- if it isn't in the file list, it won't be put in the package!
%files %doc README /usr/local/bin/cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay /usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1

The line starting with %doc is an example of RPM's handling of different file types. As you might guess, %doc stands for documentation. The %doc directive is used to mark files as being documentation. In the example above, the README file will be placed in a package-specific directory, located in /usr/doc, and called cdplayer-1.0-1. It's also possible to mark files as documentation and have them installed in other directories. This is covered in more detail in The %doc Directive in Section 13.6.1. The rest of the files in the example are shown with complete paths. This is necessary as the files will actually be installed in those directories by the application's makefile. Since RPM needs to be able to find the files prior to packaging them, complete paths are required. How Do You Create the File List? Since RPM automates so many aspects of software installation, it's easy to fall into the trap of assuming that RPM does everything for you. Not so! One task that is still a manual process is creating the file list. While it may seem at first glance, that it could be automated somehow, it's actually a more difficult problem than it seems. Since the majority of an application's files are installed by its makefile, RPM has no control over that part of the build process, and therefore, cannot automatically determine which files should be part of the package. Some people have attempted to use a modified version of install that logs the name of every file it installs. But not every makefile uses install, or if it does, uses it sporadically.


Section 11.3:Creating the Spec File

181

Another approach tried was to obtain a list of every file on the build system, immediately before and after a build, and use the differences as the file list. While this approach will certainly find every file that the application installed, it can also pick up extraneous files, such as system logs, files in /tmp, and the like. The only way to begin to make this approach workable would be to do nothing else on the build system, which is highly inconvenient. This approach also precludes building more than one package on the system at any given time. At present, the best way to create the file list is to read the makefile to see what files it installs, verify this against the files installed on the build system, and create the list.

11.3.6 The Missing Spec File Sections
Since our example spec file is somewhat simplistic, it's missing two sections that might be used in more complex situations. We'll go over each one briefly here. More complete information on these sections will be covered at various points in the book. The Install/Uninstall Scripts One missing section to our spec file is the section that would define one or more of four possible scripts. The scripts are executed at various times when a package is installed or erased. The scripts can be executed: · · · · Before a package is installed. After a package is installed. Before a package is erased. After a package is erased.

We'll see how these scripts are used in Chapter 20, Real-World Package Building. The %clean Section The other missing section has the rather descriptive title of %clean. This section can be used to clean up any files that are not part of the application's normal build area. For example, if the application creates a directory structure in /tmp as part of


182

Chapter 11:Building Packages: A Simple Example

its build, it will not be removed. By adding a sh script to the %clean section, such situations can be handled gracefully, right after the binary package is created.

11.4 Starting the Build
Now it's time to begin the build. First, we change directory into the directory holding cdplayer's spec file:
# cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS #

Next, we start the build with an rpm -b command:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec

The a following the -b option directs RPM to perform all phases of the build process. Sometimes it is necessary to stop at various phases during the initial build to resolve problems that crop up while writing the spec file. In these cases, other letters can be used after the -b in order to stop the build at the desired phase. For this example however, we will continue through the entire build process. In this example, the only other argument to the build command is the name of the package's spec file. This can be wild-carded to build more than one package, but in our example, we'll stick with one. Let's look at RPM's output during the build:
* Package: cdplayer + umask 022 + echo Excuting: %prep Excuting: %prep + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 + gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz + tar -xvvf drwxrwxr-x root/users 0 Aug 4 22:30 1996 cdplayer-1.0/ -rw-r--r-- root/users 17982 Nov 10 01:10 1995 cdplayer-1.0/COPYING -rw-r--r-- root/users 627 Nov 10 01:10 1995 cdplayer-1.0/ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- root/users 482 Nov 10 01:11 1995 cdplayer-1.0/INSTALL


Section 11.4:Starting the Build

183

... -rw-r--r-- root/users 2720 Nov 10 01:10 -rw-r--r-- root/users 730 Nov 10 01:10 -rw-r--r-- root/users 2806 Nov 10 01:10 -rw-r--r-- root/users 1515 Nov 10 01:10 + [ 0 -ne 0 ] + cd cdplayer-1.0 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 + chown -R root.root . + chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w . + exit 0

1995 1995 1995 1995

cdplayer-1.0/struct.h cdplayer-1.0/vol.c cdplayer-1.0/volume.c cdplayer-1.0/volume.h

The output continues, but let's stop here for a moment, and discuss what has happened so far. At the start of the output, RPM displays the package name (cdplayer), sets the umask, and starts executing the %prep section. Thanks to the %setup macro, RPM then changes directory into the build area, removes any existing old sources, and extracts the sources from the original compressed tar file. Although each file is listed as it is extracted, we've omitted most of the files listed, to save space. The %setup macro continues by changing directory into cdplayer's top-level source directory and setting the file ownership and permissions properly. As you can see, it does quite a bit of work for you. Let's take a look at the output from the %build section next:
+ umask 022 + echo Excuting: %build Excuting: %build + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + make gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses cdp.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses color.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses display.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses misc.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses volume.c volume.c: In function `mix_set_volume': volume.c:67: warning: implicit declaration of function `ioctl' gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses hardware.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses database.c


184

Chapter 11:Building Packages: A Simple Example

gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses getline.c gcc -o cdp cdp.o color.o display.o misc.o volume.o hardware.o database.o getline.o -I/usr/include/ncurses -L/usr/lib -lncurses groff -Tascii -man cdp.1 | compress >cdp.1.Z + exit 0

There are no surprises here. After setting the umask and changing directory into cdplayer's top-level directory, RPM issues the make command we put into the spec file. The rest of the output comes from make as it actually builds the software. Next comes the %install section:
+ umask 022 + echo Excuting: %install Excuting: %install + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + make install chmod 755 cdp chmod 644 cdp.1.Z cp cdp /usr/local/bin ln -s /usr/local/bin/cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay cp cdp.1 /usr/local/man/man1 + exit 0

Just like the previous sections, RPM again sets the umask and changes directory into the proper directory. It then executes cdplayer's install target, installing the newly built software on the build system. Those of you that carefully studied the spec file might have noticed that the README file is not part of the install section. It's not a problem, as we see here:
+ umask 022 + echo Excuting: special doc Excuting: special doc + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + DOCDIR=//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + rm -rf //usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + mkdir -p //usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + cp -ar README //usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + exit 0


Section 11.4:Starting the Build

185

After the customary umask and cd commands, RPM constructs the path that will be used for cdplayer's documentation directory. It then cleans out any preexisting directory and copies the README file into it. The cdplayer app is now installed on the build system. The only thing left to do is to create the actual package files, and perform some housekeeping. The binary package file is created first:
Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 Finding dependencies... Requires (2): libc.so.5 libncurses.so.2.0 usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README usr/local/bin/cdp usr/local/bin/cdplay usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 93 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm

The first line says it all: RPM is creating the binary package for cdplayer version 1.0, release 1. Next, RPM determines what packages are required by cdplayer1.0-1. Part of this process entails running ldd on each executable program in the package. In this example, the package requires the libraries libc.so.5, and libncurses.so.2.0. Other dependency information can be included in the spec file, but for our example we'll keep it simple. Following the dependency information, there is a list of every directory and file included in the package. The list displayed is actually the output of cpio, which is the archiving software used by RPM to bundle the package's files. The "93 blocks" is also printed by cpio. The line "Generating signature: 0" means that RPM has not been directed to add a PGP signature to the package file. During this time, however, RPM still adds two signatures that can be used to verify the size and the MD5 checksum of the package file. Finally, we see confirmation that RPM has created the binary package file. At this point, the application has been built, and the application's files have been packaged. There is no longer any need for any files created during the build, so they may be removed. In the case of the sources extracted into RPM's build directory, we


186

Chapter 11:Building Packages: A Simple Example

can see that, at worst, they will be removed the next time the package is built. But what if there were files that we needed to remove? Well, they could be deleted here, in the %clean section:
+ umask 022 + echo Excuting: %clean Excuting: %clean + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + exit 0

In our example, there are no other files outside of the build directory that are created during cdplayer's build, so we don't need to expend any additional effort to clean things up. The very last step performed by RPM is to create the source package file:
Source Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 cdplayer-1.0.spec cdplayer-1.0.tgz 80 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm #

This file includes everything needed to recreate a binary package file, as well as a copy of itself. In this example, the only files needed to do that are the original sources and the spec file. In cases where the original sources needed to be modified, the source package includes one or more patch files. As when the binary package was created, we see cpio's output listing each file archived, along with the archive's block size. Just like a binary package, a source package file can have a PGP signature attached to it. In our case, we see that a PGP signature was not attached. The last message from RPM is to confirm the creation of the source package. Let's take a look at the end products. First, the binary package:
# ls -lF /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-1 root root 24698 Aug 6 22:22 RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm #


Section 11.5:When Things Go Wrong

187

Note that we built cdplayer on an Intel-based system, so RPM placed the binary package files in the i386 subdirectory. Next, the source package file:
# ls -lF /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm -rw-r--r-1 root root 41380 Aug 6 22:22 SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm #

Everything went perfectly -- we now have binary and source package files ready to use. But sometimes things don't go so well.

11.5 When Things Go Wrong
This example is a bit of a fairy tale, in that it went perfectly the first time. In real life, it often takes several tries to get it right.

11.5.1 Problems During the Build
As we alluded to earlier in the chapter, RPM can stop at various points in the build process. This allows package builders to look through the build directory and make sure everything is proceeding properly. If there are problems, stopping during the build process permits them to see exactly what is going wrong, and where. Here is a list of points RPM can be stoped at during the build: · · · · · After the %prep section. After doing some cursory checks on the %files list. After the %build section. After the %install section. After the binary package has been created.

In addition, there is also a method that permits the package builder to "short circuit" the build process and direct RPM to skip over the initial steps. This is handy when the application is not yet ready for packaging and needs some fine tuning. This way,


188

Chapter 11:Building Packages: A Simple Example

once the package builds, installs, and operates properly, the required patches to the original sources can be created, and plugged into the package's spec file.

11.5.2 Testing Newly Built Packages
Of course, the fact that an application has been packaged successfully doesn't necessarily mean that it will operate correctly when the package is actually installed. Testing is required. In the case of our example, it's perfect and doesn't need such testing. 3But here is how testing would proceed: The first step is to find a test system. If you thought of simply using the build system, bzzzzt, try again! Think about it -- in the course of building the package, the build system actually had the application installed on it. That is how RPM gets the files that are to be packaged: by building the software, installing it, and grabbing copies of the installed files, which are found using the %files list. Some of you dissenters that have read the first half of the book might be thinking, "Why not just install the package on the build system using the --replacefiles option? That way, it'll just blow away the files installed by the build process and replace them with the packaged files." Well, you folks get a bzzzzt, too! Here's why. Say, for example, that the software you're packaging installs a bunch of files -- maybe a hundred. What does this mean? Well for one thing, it means that the package's %files list is going to be quite large. For another thing, the sheer number of files makes it likely that you'll miss one or two. What would happen then? When RPM builds the software, there's no problem: the software builds, and the application's makefile merrily installs all the files. The next step in RPM's build process is to collect the files by reading the %files list, and to add each file listed to a cpio archive. What happens to the files you've missed? Nothing -- they aren't added to the package file, but they are on your build system, installed just where they should be. Next, when the package is installed using --replacefiles, RPM dutifully installs each of the packaged files, replacing the ones originally installed on the build system. The missed files? They aren't overwritten by RPM since they weren't in the
3 Like we said, it's a fairy tale!


Section 11.5:When Things Go Wrong

189

package. But they're still on disk, right where the application expects them to be! If you go to test the application then, it will find every file it needs. But not every file came from the package. Bad news! Using a different system on which the application had never been built is one sure way to test for missing files. That wraps up our fictional build. Now that we have some experience with RPM's build process, we can take a more in-depth look at RPM's build command.


190

Chapter 11:Building Packages: A Simple Example


rpm -b Command Reference

191

12

rpm -b Command Reference
rpm -b options file1.spec ... fileN.spec Page Section 12.1.1, rpm -bp -- Execute %prep Section 12.1.2, rpm -bc -- Execute %prep, %build Section 12.1.3, rpm -bi -- Execute %prep, %build, %install Section 12.1.4, rpm -bb -- Execute %prep, %build, %install, package (bin) Section 12.1.5, rpm -ba -- Execute %prep, %build, %install, package (bin, src) Section 12.1.6, rpm -bl -- Check %files list

Table 12­1 rpm -b Command Syntax

p c

Execute %prep Execute %prep, %build Execute %prep, %build, %install Execute %prep, %build, %install. Package (bin) Execute %prep, %build, %install. Package (bin, src) Check %files list Parameters

i

b

a

l

file1.spec ... fileN.spec Build-specific Options

One or more .spec files Page


192

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

--short-circuit

Force build to start at particular stage (-bc, -bi only) Create, save build scripts for review Clean up after build

Section 12.1.7, --short-circuit -- Force build to start at particular stage Section 12.1.11, --test -- Create, Save Build Scripts For Review Section 12.1.12, --clean -- Clean up after build

--test

--clean

--sign

Add a digital signature to Section 12.1.10, --sign the package -- Add a Digital Signature to the Package Execute %install Section 12.1.13, using as the root --buildroot -- Execute %install using as the root Perform build for the architecture Section 12.1.8, --buildarch -- Perform Build For the Architecture Section 12.1.9, --buildos -- Perform Build For the Operating System

--buildroot

--buildarch

--buildos

Perform build for the operating system


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

193

--timecheck

Print a warning if files are Section 12.1.14, over old --timecheck -- Print a warning if files to be packaged are over old General Options Page Section 12.1.15, -vv -- Display debugging information Display debugging information

-vv

--quiet

Produce as little output as Section 12.1.16, possible --quiet -- Produce as Little Output as Possible Set alternate rpmrc file to Section 12.1.17, --rcfile -- Set alternate rpmrc file to

--rcfile

12.1 rpm -b -- What Does it Do?
When RPM is invoked with the -b option, the process of building a package is started. The rest of the command will determine exactly what is to be built and how far the build should proceed. In this chapter, we'll explore every aspect of rpm -b. An RPM build command must have two additional pieces of information, over and above "rpm -b": 1. 2. The names of one or more spec files representing software to be packaged. The desired stage at which the build is to stop.

As we discussed in Chapter 10, The Basics of Developing With RPM, the spec file is one of the inputs to RPM's build process. It contains the information necessary for RPM to perform the build and package the software.


194

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

There are a number of stages that RPM goes through during a build. By specifying that the build process is to stop at a certain stage, the package builder can monitor the build's progress, make any changes necessary, and restart the build. Let's start by looking at the various stages that can be specified in a build command.

12.1.1 rpm -bp -- Execute %prep
The command rpm -bp directs RPM to execute the very first step in the build process. In the spec file, this step is labeled %prep. Every command in the %prep section will be executed when the -bp option is used. Here's a simple %prep section from the spec file we used in Chapter 11, Building Packages: A Simple Example:
%prep %setup

This %prep section consists of a single %setup macro. When using rpm -bp against this spec file, we can see exactly what %setup does:
# rpm -bp cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer + umask 022 + echo Executing: %prep Executing: %prep + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 + gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz + tar -xvvf drwxrwxr-x root/users 0 Aug 4 22:30 1996 cdplayer-1.0/ -rw-r--r-- root/users 17982 Nov 10 01:10 1995 cdplayer-1.0/COPYING -rw-r--r-- root/users 627 Nov 10 01:10 1995 cdplayer-1.0/ChangeLog ... -rw-r--r-- root/users 2806 Nov 10 01:10 1995 cdplayer-1.0/volume.c -rw-r--r-- root/users 1515 Nov 10 01:10 1995 cdplayer-1.0/volume.h + [ 0 -ne 0 ] + cd cdplayer-1.0 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 + chown -R root.root . + chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w . + exit 0


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

195

#

First, RPM confirms that the cdplayer package is the subject of this build. Then it sets the umask and starts executing the %prep section. At this point, the %setup macro is doing its thing. It changes directory into the build area and removes any old copies of cdplayer's build tree. Next, %setup unzips the sources and uses tar to create the build tree. We've removed the complete listing of files, but be prepared to see lots of output if the software being packaged is large. Finally, %setup changes directory into cdplayer's build tree and changes ownership and file permissions appropriately. The exit 0 signifies the end of the %prep section, and therefore, the end of the %setup macro. Since we used the -bp option, RPM stopped at this point. Let's see what RPM left in the build area:
# cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD # ls -l total 1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root #

1024 Aug

4 22:30 cdplayer-1.0

There's the top-level directory. Changing directory into cdplayer-1.0, we find the sources are ready to be built:
# cd cdplayer-1.0 # ls -lF total 216 -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root ... -rw-r--r-1 root -rw-r--r-1 root #

root root root root

17982 Nov 10 627 Nov 10 2806 Nov 10 1515 Nov 10

1995 COPYING 1995 ChangeLog 1995 volume.c 1995 volume.h

We can see that %setup's chown and chmod commands did what they were supposed to -- the files are owned by root, with permissions set appropriately.


196

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

If not stopped by the -bp option, the next step in RPM's build process would be to build the software. RPM can also be stopped at the end of the %build section in the spec file. This is done by using the -bc option:

12.1.2 rpm -bc -- Execute %prep, %build
When built. cuted. to cut the -bc option is used during a build, RPM stops once the software has been In terms of the spec file, every command in the %build section will be exeIn the following example, we've removed the output from the %prep section down on the redundant output, but keep in mind that it is executed nonetheless:

# rpm -bc cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer Executing: %prep ... + exit 0 Executing: %build + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + make gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses cdp.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses color.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses display.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses misc.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses volume.c volume.c: In function `mix_set_volume': volume.c:67: warning: implicit declaration of function `ioctl' gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses hardware.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses database.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses getline.c gcc -o cdp cdp.o color.o display.o misc.o volume.o hardware.o database.o getline.o -I/usr/include/ncurses -L/usr/lib -lncurses groff -Tascii -man cdp.1 | compress >cdp.1.Z + exit 0 #

After the command, we see RPM executing the %prep section (which we've removed almost entirely). Next, RPM starts executing the contents of the %build section. In our example spec file, the %build section looks like this:
%build make


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

197

We see that prior to top-level directory. mand. At this point, the -bc option was

the make command, RPM changes directory into cdplayer's RPM then starts the make, which ends with the groff comthe execution of the %build section has been completed. Since used, RPM stops at this point.

The next step in the build process would be to install the newly built software. This is done in the %install section of the spec file. RPM can be stopped after the install has taken place by using the -bi option:

12.1.3 rpm -bi -- Execute %prep, %build, %install
By using the -bi option, RPM is directed to stop once the software is completely built and installed on the build system. Here's what the output of a build using the -bi option looks like:
# rpm -bi cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer Executing: %prep ... + exit 0 Executing: %build ... + exit 0 Executing: %install + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + make install chmod 755 cdp chmod 644 cdp.1.Z cp cdp /usr/local/bin ln -s /usr/local/bin/cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay cp cdp.1 /usr/local/man/man1 + exit 0 + umask 022 + echo Executing: special doc Executing: special doc + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + DOCDIR=//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + rm -rf //usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + mkdir -p //usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1


198

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

+ cp -ar README //usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + exit 0 #

As before, we've excised most of the previously described sections. In this example, the %install section looks like:
%install make install

After the %prep and %build sections, the %install section is executed. Looking at the output, we see that RPM changes directory into cdplayer's top-level directory and issues the make install command, the sole command in the %install section. The output from that point until the first exit 0, is from make install. The remaining commands are due to the contents of the spec file's %files list. Here's what it looks like:
%files %doc README /usr/local/bin/cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay /usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1

The line responsible is %doc README. The %doc tag identifies the file as being documentation. RPM handles documentation files by creating a directory in /usr/doc and placing all documentation in it. The exit 0 at the end signifies the end of the %install section. RPM stops due to the -bi option. The next step at which RPM's build process can be stopped is after the software's binary package file has been created. This is done using the -bb option:

12.1.4 rpm -bb -- Execute %prep, %build, %install, package (bin)
# rpm -bb cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

199

Executing: %prep ... + exit 0 Executing: %build ... + exit 0 Executing: %install ... + exit 0 Executing: special doc ... + exit 0 Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 Finding dependencies... Requires (2): libc.so.5 libncurses.so.2.0 usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README usr/local/bin/cdp usr/local/bin/cdplay usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 93 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm + umask 022 + echo Executing: %clean Executing: %clean + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + exit 0 #

After executing the %prep, %build, and %install sections, and handling any special documentation files, RPM then creates a binary package file. In the sample output, we see that first RPM performs automatic dependency checking. It does this by determining which shared libraries are required by the executable programs contained in the package. Next, RPM actually archives the files to be packaged, optionally signs the package file, and outputs the finished product. The last part of RPM's output looks suspiciously like a section in the spec file being executed. In our example, there is no %clean section. If there were, however, RPM would have executed any commands in the section. In the absence of a %clean section, RPM simply issues the usual cd commands and exits normally.


200

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

12.1.5 rpm -ba -- Execute %prep, %build, %install, package (bin, src)
The -ba option directs RPM to perform all the stages in building a package. With this one command, RPM: · · · · · · Unpacks the original sources. Applies patches (if desired). Builds the software. Installs the software. Creates the binary package file. Creates the source package file.

That's quite a bit of work for one command! Here it is, in action:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer Executing: %prep ... + exit 0 Executing: %build ... + exit 0 Executing: %install ... + exit 0 Executing: special doc ... + exit 0 Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 ... Executing: %clean ... + exit 0 Source Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 cdplayer-1.0.spec cdplayer-1.0.tgz 80 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

201

#

As in previous examples, RPM executes the %prep, %build, and %install sections, handles any special documentation files, creates a binary package file, and cleans up after itself. The final step in the build process is to create a source package file. As the output shows, it consists of the spec file and the original sources. A source package may optionally include one or more patch files, although in our example, cdplayer requires none. At the end of a build using the -ba option, the software has been successfully built and packaged in both binary and source form. But there are a few more build-time options that we can use. One of them is the -bl option:

12.1.6 rpm -bl -- Check %files list
There's one last letter that may be specified with rpm -b, but unlike the others, which indicate the stage at which the build process is to stop, this option performs a variety of checks on the %files list in the named spec file. When l is added to rpm -b, the following checks are performed: · · · Expands the spec file's %files list and checks that each file listed actually exists. Determines what shared libraries the software requires by examining every executable file listed. Determines what shared libraries are provided by the package.

Why is it necessary to do all this checking? When would it be useful? Keep in mind that the %files list must be generated manually. By using the -bl option, the following steps are all that's necessary to create a %files list: · · · Writing the %files list. Using the -bl option to check the %files list. Making any necessary changes to the %files list.


202

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

It may take more than one iteration through these steps, but eventually the list check will pass. Using the -bl option to check the %files list is certainly better than starting a two-hour package build, only to find out at the very end that the list contains a misspelled filename. Here's an example of the -bl option in action:
# rpm -bl cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer File List Check: cdplayer-1.0-1 Finding dependencies... Requires (2): libc.so.5 libncurses.so.2.0 #

It's hard to see exactly what RPM is doing from the output, but if we add -vv, we can get a bit more information:
# rpm -bl -vv cdplayer-1.0.spec D: Switched to BASE package D: Source(0) = sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/apps/sound/cds/cdplayer-1.0.tgz D: Switching to part: 12 D: fileFile = D: Switched to package: (null) D: Switching to part: 2 D: fileFile = D: Switching to part: 3 D: fileFile = D: Switching to part: 4 D: fileFile = D: Switching to part: 10 D: fileFile = D: Switched to package: (null) * Package: cdplayer File List Check: cdplayer-1.0-1 D: ADDING: /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 D: ADDING: /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README D: ADDING: /usr/local/bin/cdp D: ADDING: /usr/local/bin/cdplay D: ADDING: /usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 D: md5(/usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README) = 2c149b2fb1a4d65418131a19b242601c D: md5(/usr/local/bin/cdp) = 0f2a7a2f81812c75fd01c52f456798d6 D: md5(/usr/local/bin/cdplay) = d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e D: md5(/usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1) = b32cc867ae50e2bdfa4d6780b084adfa


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

203

Finding dependencies... D: Adding require: libncurses.so.2.0 D: Adding require: libc.so.5 Requires (2): libc.so.5 libncurses.so.2.0 #

Looking at this more verbose output, it's easy to see there's a great deal going on. Some of it is not directly pertinent to checking the %files list, however. For example, the output extending from the first line, to the line reading * Package: cdplayer, reflects processing that takes place during actual package building, and can be ignored. Following that section is the actual %files list check. In this section, every file named in the %files list is checked to make sure it exists. The phrase, ADDING:, again reflects RPM's package building roots. When using the -bl option, however, RPM is simply making sure the files exist on the build system. If the --timecheck option (described a bit later, on Section 12.1.14, --timecheck -- Print a warning if files to be packaged are over old ) is present, the checks required by that option are performed here, as well. After the list check, the MD5 checksums of each file are calculated and displayed. While this information is vital during actual package building, it is not used when using the -bl option. Finally, RPM determines which shared libraries the listed files require. In this case, there are only two -- libc.so.5, and libncurses.so.2.0. While not strictly a part of the list-checking process, displaying shared library dependencies can be quite helpful at this point. It can point out possible problems, such as assuming that the target systems have a certain library installed when, in fact, they do not. So far, we've only seen what happens when the %files list is correct. Let's see what happens where the list has problems. In this example, we've added a bogus file to the package's %files list:
# rpm -bl cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer File List Check: cdplayer-1.0-1 File not found: /usr/local/bin/bogus Build failed.


204

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

#

Reflecting more of its package building roots, rpm -bl says that the "build failed". But the bottom line is that there is no such file as /usr/bin/bogus. In this example we made the name obviously wrong, but in a more real-world setting, the name will more likely be a misspelling in the %files list. OK, let's correct the %files list and try again:
# rpm -bl cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer File List Check: cdplayer-1.0-1 File not found: /usr/local/bin/cdplay Build failed. #

Another error! In this case the file is spelled correctly, but it is not on the build system, even though it should be. Perhaps it was deleted accidentally. In any case, let's rebuild the software and try again:
# rpm -bi cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer Executing: %prep ... + exit 0 Executing: %build ... + exit 0 Executing: %install ... ln -s /usr/local/bin/cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay ... + exit 0 Executing: special doc ... + exit 0 # # rpm -bl cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer File List Check: cdplayer-1.0-1 Finding dependencies... Requires (2): libc.so.5 libncurses.so.2.0


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

205

#

Done! The moral to this story is that using rpm -bl and fixing the error it flagged doesn't necessarily mean your %files list is ready for prime-time: Always run it again to make sure!

12.1.7 --short-circuit -- Force build to start at particular stage
Although it sounds dangerous, the --short-circuit option can be your friend. This option is used during the initial development of a package. Earlier in the chapter, we explored stopping RPM's build process at different stages. Using --shortcircuit, we can start the build process at different stages. One time that --short-circuit comes in handy is when you're trying to get software to build properly. Just think what it would be like -- you're hacking away at the sources, trying a build, getting an error, and hacking some more to fix that error. Without --short-circuit, you'd have to: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Make your change to the sources. Use tar to create a new source archive. Start a build with something like rpm -bc. See another bug. Go back to step 1.

Pretty cumbersome! Since RPM's build process is designed to start with the sources in their original tar file, unless your modifications end up in that tar file, they won't be used in the next build. 1 But there's another way. Just follow these steps: 1. Place the original source tar file in RPM's SOURCES directory.
1 As we mentioned in Chapter 10, The Basics of Developing With RPM, if the original sources need to be modified, the modifications should be kept as a separate set of patches. However, during development, it makes more sense to not generate patches every time a change to the original source is made.


206

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

2. 3.

Create a partial spec file in RPM's SPECS directory (Be sure to include a valid Source line). Issue an rpm -bp to properly create the build environment.

Now use --short-circuit to attempt a compile. Here's an example:
# rpm -bc --short-circuit cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer + umask 022 + echo Executing: %build Executing: %build + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + make gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses cdp.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses color.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses display.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses misc.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses volume.c volume.c: In function `mix_set_volume': volume.c:67: warning: implicit declaration of function `ioctl' gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses hardware.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses database.c gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses getline.c gcc -o cdp cdp.o color.o display.o misc.o volume.o hardware.o database.o getline.o -I/usr/include/ncurses -L/usr/lib -lncurses groff -Tascii -man cdp.1 | compress >cdp.1.Z + exit 0 #

Normally, the -bc option instructs RPM to stop the build after the %build section of the spec file has been executed. By adding --short-circuit, however, RPM starts the build by executing the %build section and stops when everything in %build has been executed. There is only one other build stage that can be --short-circuit the install stage. The reason for this restriction is to make it difficult to use of pristine sources. If it were possible to --short-circuit to package builder might take the "easy" way out and simply hack at the 'ed, and that is bypass RPM's -bb or -ba, a build tree until


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

207

the software built successfully, then package the hacked sources. So, RPM will only --short-circuit to -bc or -bi. Nothing else will do. What exactly does an rpm -bi --short-circuit do, anyway? Like an rpm -bc --short-circuit, it starts executing at the named stage, which in this case is %install. Note that the build environment must be ready to perform an install before attempting to --short-circuit to the %install stage. If the software installs via make install, make will automatically compile the software anyway. And what happens if the build environment isn't ready and a --short-circuit is attempted? Let's see:
# rpm -bi --short-circuit cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer + umask 022 + echo Executing: %install Executing: %install + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 /var/tmp/rpmbu01157aaa: cdplayer-1.0: No such file or directory Bad exit status #

RPM blindly started executing the %install stage, but came to an abrupt halt when it attempted to change directory into cdplayer-1.0, which didn't exist. After giving a descriptive error message, RPM exited with a failure status. Except for some minor differences, rpm -bc would have failed in the same way.

12.1.8 --buildarch -- Perform Build For the Architecture
The --buildarch option is used to override RPM's architecture detection logic. The option is followed by the desired architecture name. Here's an example:
# rpm -ba --buildarch i486 cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer ... Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 ... Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i486/cdplayer-1.0-1.i486.rpm ...


208

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm #

We've removed most of RPM's output from this example, but the main thing we can see from this example is that the package was built for the i486 architecture, due to the inclusion of the --buildarch option on the command line. We can also see that RPM wrote the binary package in the architecture-specific directory, /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i486. Using RPM's --queryformat option confirms the package's architecture:
# rpm -qp --queryformat '%{arch}\n' /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i486/cdplayer-1.0-1.i486.rpm i486 #

For more information on build packages for multiple architectures, please see Chapter 19, Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems .

12.1.9 --buildos -- Perform Build For the Operating System
The --buildos option is used to override RPM's operating system detection logic. The option is followed by the desired operating system name. Here's an example:
# rpm ... Binary ... Wrote: Source ... Wrote: # -ba --buildos osf1 cdplayer-1.0.spec Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm

There's nothing in the build output that explicitly states the build operating system as been set to osf1. Let's see if --queryformat will tell us:
# rpm -qp --queryformat '%{os}\n' /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

209

osf1 #

The package was indeed built for the specified operating system. For more information on building packages for multiple operating systems, please see Chapter 19, Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems .

12.1.10 --sign -- Add a Digital Signature to the Package
The --sign option directs RPM to add a digital signature to the package being built. Currently, this is done using PGP. Here's an example of --sign in action:
# rpm -ba --sign cdplayer-1.0.spec Enter pass phrase: passphrase (not echoed) Pass phrase is good. * Package: cdplayer ... Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 ... Generating signature: 1002 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm ... Source Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 ... Generating signature: 1002 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm #

The most obvious effect of adding the --sign option to a build command is that RPM then asks for your private key's passphrase. After entering the passphrase (which isn't echoed), the build proceeds as usual. The only other difference between this and a non-signed build is that the Generating signature: lines have a non-zero value. Let's check the source and binary packages we've just created and see if they are, in fact, signed:
# rpm --checksig /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm: size pgp md5 OK # rpm --checksig /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm


210

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm: size pgp md5 OK #

The fact that there is a pgp in --checksig's output indicates that the packages have been signed. For more information on signing packages, please see Chapter 17, Adding PGP Signatures to a Package. Also, Appendix G, An Introduction to PGP contains information on obtaining and installing PGP.

12.1.11 --test -- Create, Save Build Scripts For Review
There are times when it might be necessary to get a more in-depth view of a particular build. By using the --test option, it's easy. When --test is added to a build command, the scripts RPM would normally use to actually perform the build, are created and saved for you to review. Let's see how it works:
# rpm -ba --test cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer #

Unlike a normal build, there's not much output. But the --test option has caused a set of scripts to be written and saved for you. The question is: Where are they? If you are using a customized rpmrc file, the scripts will be written to the directory specified by the rpmrc entry tmppath. If you haven't changed this setting, RPM, by default, writes the scripts in /var/tmp. Here they are:
# ls -l /var/tmp total 4 -rw-rw-r-1 root -rw-rw-r-1 root -rw-rw-r-1 root -rw-rw-r-1 root # root root root root 670 449 482 552 Sep Sep Sep Sep 17 17 17 17 20:35 20:35 20:35 20:35 rpmbu00236aaa rpmbu00236baa rpmbu00236caa rpmbu00236daa

Each file contains a script that performs a given part of the build. Here's the first file:
#!/bin/sh -e


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

211

# Script generated by rpm RPM_SOURCE_DIR="/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES" RPM_BUILD_DIR="/usr/src/redhat/BUILD" RPM_DOC_DIR="/usr/doc" RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce" RPM_ARCH="i386" RPM_OS="Linux" RPM_ROOT_DIR="/tmp/cdplayer" RPM_BUILD_ROOT="/tmp/cdplayer" RPM_PACKAGE_NAME="cdplayer" RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION="1.0" RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE="1" set -x umask 022 echo Executing: %prep cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd cdplayer-1.0 cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

As we can see, this script contains the %prep section from the spec file. The script starts off by defining a number of environment variables and then leads into the %prep section. In the spec file used in this build, the %prep section consists of a single %setup macro. In this file, we can see exactly how RPM expands that macro. The remaining files follow the same basic layout -- a section defining environment variables, followed by the commands to be executed. Note that the --test option will only create script files for each build stage, as specified in the command line. For example, if the above command was changed to:
# rpm -bp --test cdplayer-1.0.spec


212

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

#

only one script file, containing the %prep commands, would be written. In any case, no matter what RPM build command is used, the --test option can let you see exactly what is going to happen during a build.

12.1.12 --clean -- Clean up after build
The --clean option can be used to ensure that the package's build directory tree is removed at the end of a build. Although it can be used with any build stage, it doesn't always make much sense to do so:
# rpm -bp --clean cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer Executing: %prep ... + exit 0 + echo Executing: sweep Executing: sweep + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 + exit 0 #

In this example, we see a typical %prep section being executed. The line "+ echo Executing: sweep" indicates the start of --clean's activity. After changing directory into the build directory, RPM then issues a recursive delete on the package's top-level directory. As we noted above, this particular example doesn't make much sense. We're only executing the %prep section, which creates the package's build tree, and using --clean, which removes it! Using --clean with the -bc option isn't very productive either, as the newly built software remains in the build tree. Once again, there would be no remnants left after --clean has done its thing. Normally, the --clean option is used once the software builds and can be packaged successfully. It is particularly useful when more than one package is to be built, since


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

213

--clean ensures that the filesystem holding the build area will not fill up with build trees from each package. Note also that the --clean option only removes the files that reside in the software's build tree. If there are any files that the build creates outside of this hierarchy, it will be necessary to write a script for the spec file's %clean section.

12.1.13 --buildroot -- Execute %install using as the root
The --buildroot option can make two difficult situations much easier: · · Performing a build without impacting the build system. Allowing non-root users to build packages.

Let's study the first situation in a bit more detail. Say, for example, that sendmail is to be packaged. In the course of creating a sendmail package, the software must be installed. This would mean that critical sendmail files, such as sendmail.cf and aliases, would be overwritten. Mail handling on the build system would almost certainly be disrupted. In the second case, it's certainly possible to set permissions such that non-root users can install software, but highly unlikely that any system administrator worth their salt would do so. What can be done to make these situations more tenable? The --buildroot option is used to instruct RPM to use a directory other than / as a "build root". This phrase is a bit misleading, in that the build root is not the root directory under which the software is built. Rather, it is the root directory for the install phase of the build. When a build root is not specified, the software being packaged is installed relative to the build system's root directory "/". However, it's not enough to just specify a build root on the command line. The spec file for the package must be set up to support a build root. If you don't make the necessary changes, this is what you'll see:
# rpm -ba --buildroot /tmp/foo cdplayer-1.0.spec Package can not do build prefixes Build failed. #


214

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

Chapter 16, Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere has complete instructions on the modifications necessary to configure a package to use an alternate build root, as well as methods to permit users to build packages without root access. Assuming that the necessary modifications have been made, here is what the build would look like:
# rpm -ba --buildroot /tmp/foonly cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer Executing: %prep + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD ... + exit 0 Executing: %build + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 ... + exit 0 + umask 022 Executing: %install + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + make ROOT=/tmp/foonly install install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 -d /tmp/foonly/usr/local/bin/ install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 cdp /tmp/foonly/usr/local/bin/cdp rm -f /tmp/foonly/usr/local/bin/cdplay ln -s /tmp/foonly/usr/local/bin/cdp /tmp/foonly/usr/local/bin/cdplay install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 -d /tmp/foonly/usr/local/man/man1/ install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 cdp.1 /tmp/foonly/usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 + exit 0 Executing: special doc + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + DOCDIR=/tmp/foonly//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + rm -rf /tmp/foonly//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + mkdir -p /tmp/foonly//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + cp -ar README /tmp/foonly//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + exit 0 Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 Finding dependencies... Requires (2): libc.so.5 libncurses.so.2.0 usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

215

usr/local/bin/cdp usr/local/bin/cdplay usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 93 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm + umask 022 + echo Executing: %clean Executing: %clean + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + exit 0 Source Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 cdplayer-1.0.spec cdplayer-1.0.tgz 82 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm #

As the somewhat edited output shows, the %prep, %build, and %install sections are executed in RPM's normal build directory. However, the --buildroot option comes into play when the make install is done. As we can see, the ROOT variable is set to /tmp/foonly, which was the value following --buildroot on the command line. From that point on, we can see that make substituted the new build root value during the install phase. The build root is also used when documentation files are installed. The documentation directory cdplayer-1.0-1 is created in /tmp/foonly/usr/doc, and the README file is placed in it. The only remaining difference that results from using --buildroot, is that the files to be included in the binary package are not located relative to the build system's root directory. Instead they are located relative to the build root /tmp/foonly. The resulting binary and source package files are functionally equivalent to packages built without the use of --buildroot.


216

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

Using --buildroot Can Bite You! Although the --buildroot option can solve some problems, using a build root can actually be dangerous. How? Consider the following situation: · · · A spec file is configured to have a build root of /tmp/blather, for instance. In the %prep section 2, there is an rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT command to clean out any old installed software. You decide to build the software so that it installs relative to your system's root directory, so you enter the following command: "rpm -ba --buildroot / foo.spec".

The end result? Since specifying "/" as the build root sets $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to "/", that innocuous little rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT turns into rm -rf /! A recursive delete, starting at your system's root directory, might not be a total disaster if you catch it quickly, but in either case, you'll be testing your ability to restore from backup... Er, you do have backups, don't you? The moral of this story is to be very careful when using --buildroot. A good rule of thumb is to always specify a unique build root. For example, instead of specifying /tmp as a build root (and possibly losing your system's directory for holding temporary files), use the path /tmp/mypackage, where the directory mypackage is used only by the package you're building.

12.1.14 --timecheck -- Print a warning if files to be packaged are over old
While it's possible to detect many errors in the %files list using rpm -bl, there is another type of problem that can't be detected. Consider the following scenario: · · A package you're building creates the file /usr/bin/foo. Because of a problem with the package's makefile, foo is never copied into /usr/bin.

2 Or the %clean section, it doesn't matter -- the end result is the same.


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

217

· ·

An older, incompatible version of foo, created several months ago, already exists in /usr/bin. RPM creates the binary package file.

Is the incompatible /usr/bin/foo included in the package? You bet it is! If only there was some way for RPM to catch this type of problem... Well, there is! By adding --timecheck, followed by a number, RPM will check each file being packaged, to see if the file is more than the specified number of seconds old. If it is, a warning message is displayed. The --timecheck option works with either the -ba or -bl options. Here's an example using -bl:
# rpm -bl --timecheck 3600 cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer File List Check: cdplayer-1.0-1 warning: TIMECHECK failure: /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README Finding dependencies... Requires (2): libc.so.5 libncurses.so.2.0 #

In this example, the file /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README is more than 3,600 seconds, or one hour, old. If we take a look at the file, we find that it is: 3
# ls -al /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README -rw-r--r-1 root root 1085 Nov 10 # 1995 README

In this particular case, the warning from --timecheck is no cause for alarm. Since the README file was simply copied from the original source, which was created November 10th, 1995, its date is unchanged. If the file had been an executable or a library that was supposedly built recently, --timecheck's warning should be taken more seriously. If you'd like to set a default time check value of one hour, you can include the following line in your rpmrc file:
timecheck: 3600 3 It should be noted that the package was built substantially later than November of 1995!


218

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

This value can still be overridden by a value on the command line, if desired. For more information on the use of rpmrc files, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.

12.1.15 -vv -- Display debugging information
Unlike most other RPM commands, there is no -v option for rpm -b. That's because the command's default is to be verbose. However, even more information can be obtained by adding -vv. Here's an example:
# rpm -bp -vv cdplayer-1.0.spec D: Switched to BASE package D: Source(0) = sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/apps/sound/cds/cdplayer-1.0.tgz D: Switching to part: 12 D: fileFile = D: Switched to package: (null) D: Switching to part: 2 D: fileFile = D: Switching to part: 3 D: fileFile = D: Switching to part: 4 D: fileFile = D: Switching to part: 10 D: fileFile = D: Switched to package: (null) * Package: cdplayer D: RUNNING: %prep + umask 022 + echo Executing: %prep Executing: %prep + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 + gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz + tar -xvvf drwxrwxr-x root/users 0 Aug 4 22:30 1996 cdplayer-1.0/ -rw-r--r-- root/users 17982 Nov 10 01:10 1995 cdplayer-1.0/COPYING ... -rw-r--r-- root/users 1515 Nov 10 01:10 1995 cdplayer-1.0/volume.h + [ 0 -ne 0 ] + cd cdplayer-1.0 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 + chown -R root.root .


Section 12.1:rpm -b -- What Does it Do?

219

+ chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 #

Most of the output generated by the -vv option is preceded by a D:. In this example, the additional output represents RPM's internal processing during the start of the build process. Using the -vv option with other build commands will produce different output.

12.1.16 --quiet -- Produce as Little Output as Possible
As we mentioned above, the build command is normally verbose. The --quiet option can be used to cut down on the command's output:
# rpm -ba --quiet cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer volume.c: In function `mix_set_volume': volume.c:67: warning: implicit declaration of function `ioctl' 90 blocks 82 blocks #

This is the entire output from a package build of cdplayer. Note that warning messages (actually, anything sent to stdout) are still printed.

12.1.17 --rcfile -- Set alternate rpmrc file to
The --rcfile option is used to specify a file containing default settings for RPM. Normally, this option is not needed. By default, RPM uses /etc/rpmrc and a file named .rpmrc located in your login directory. This option would be used if there was a need to switch between several sets of RPM defaults. Software developers and package builders will normally be the only people using the --rcfile option. For more information on rpmrc files, see Appendix B, The rpmrc File.


220

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

12.2 Other Build-related Commands
There are two other commands that also perform build-related functions. However, they do not use the rpm -b command syntax that we've been studying so far. Instead of specifying the name of the spec file, as with rpm -b, it's necessary to specify the name of the source package file. Why the difference in syntax? The reason has to do with the differing functions of these commands. Unlike rpm -b, where the name of the game is to get software packaged into binary and source package files, these commands use an already-existing source package file as input. Let's take a look at them:

12.2.1 rpm --recompile -- What Does it Do?
The --recompile option directs RPM to perform the following steps: · · · · · Install the specified source package file. Unpack the original sources. Build the software. Install the software. Remove the software's build directory structure.

While you might think this sounds a great deal like an install of the source package file, followed by an rpm -bi, this is not entirely the case. Using --recompile, the only file required is the source package file. After the software is built and installed, the only thing left, other than the newly installed software, is the original source package file. The --recompile option is normally used when a previously installed package needs to be recompiled. --recompile comes in handy when software needs to be compiled against a new version of the kernel. Here's what RPM displays during a --recompile:
# rpm --recompile cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm Installing cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm * Package: cdplayer Executing: %prep


Section 12.2:Other Build-related Commands

221

... + exit 0 Executing: ... + exit 0 Executing: ... + exit 0 Executing: ... + exit 0 Executing: ... + exit 0 #

%build

%install

special doc

sweep

The very first line shows RPM installing the source package. After that are ordinary executions of the %prep, %build, and %install sections of the spec file. Finally, the cleanup of the software's build directory takes place, just as if the --clean option had been specified. Since rpm -i or rpm -U are not being used to install the software, the RPM database is not updated during a --recompile. This means that doing a --recompile on an already-installed package may result in problems down the road, when RPM is used to upgrade or verify the package.

12.2.2 rpm --rebuild -- What Does it Do?
Package builders, particularly those that create packages for multiple architectures, often need to build their packages starting from the original sources. The --rebuild option does this, starting from a source package file. Here is the list of steps it performs: · · · · Install the specified source package file. Unpack the original sources. Build the software. Install the software.


222

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference

· ·

Create a binary package file. Remove the software's build directory tree.

Like the --recompile option, --rebuild cleans up after itself. The only difference between the two commands is the fact that --rebuild also creates a binary package file. The only remnants of a --rebuild are the original source package, the newly installed software, and a new binary package file. Package builders find this command especially handy, as it allows them to create new binary packages using one command, with no additional cleanups required. There are several times when --rebuild is normally used: · · When the build environment (eg. compilers, libraries, etc.) has changed. When binary packages for a different architecture are to be built.

Here's an example of the --rebuild option in action:
# rpm --rebuild cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm Installing cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm * Package: cdplayer Executing: %prep ... + exit 0 Executing: %build ... + exit 0 Executing: %install ... + exit 0 Executing: special doc ... + exit 0 Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 ... Executing: %clean ... + exit 0 Executing: sweep ... + exit 0 #


Section 12.2:Other Build-related Commands

223

The very first line shows RPM installing the source package. The lines after that are ordinary executions of the %prep, %build, and %install sections of the spec file. Next, a binary package file is created. Finally, the spec file's %clean section (if one exists) is executed. The cleanup of the software's build directory takes place, just as if the --clean option had been specified. That completes our overview of the commands used to build packages with RPM. In the next chapter, we'll look at the various macros that are available and how they can make life easier for the package builder.


224

Chapter 12:rpm -b Command Reference


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

225

13

Inside the Spec File

In this chapter, we're going to cover the spec file in detail. There are a number of different types of entries that comprise a spec file, and every one will be documented here. The different types of entries are: · · · · · · · Comments -- Human-readable notes ignored by RPM. Tags -- Define data. Scripts -- Contain commands to be executed at specific times. Macros -- A method of executing multiple commands easily. The %files list -- A list of files to be included in the package. Directives -- Used in the %files list to direct RPM to handle certain files in a specific way. Conditionals -- Permit operating system- or architecture-specific preprocessing of the spec file.

Let's start by looking at comments.

13.1 Comments: Notes Ignored by RPM
Comments are a way to make RPM ignore a line in the spec file. The contents of a comment line are entirely up to the person writing the spec file. To create a comment, enter an octothorp (#) at the start of the line. Any text following the comment character will be ignored by RPM. Here's an example comment:
# This is the spec file for playmidi 2.3...

Comments can be placed in any section of the spec file.

13.2 Tags: Data Definitions
Looking at a spec file, the first thing you'll see are a number of lines, all following the same basic format:


226

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

:

The is known as a "tag", because it is used by RPM to name or tag some data. The tag is separated from its associated data by a colon. The data is represented by the above. Tags are grouped together at the top of the spec file, in a section known as the preamble. Here's an example of a tag and its data:
Vendor: White Socks Software, Inc.

In this example, the tag is "Vendor". Tags are not case-sensitive -- they may be all uppercase, all lowercase, or anything in-between. The Vendor tag is used to define the name of the organization producing the package. The data in this example is "White Socks Software, Inc.". Therefore, RPM will store White Socks Software, Inc. as the vendor of the package. Note, also, that spacing between the tag, the colon, and the data is unimportant. Given this, and the case-insensitivity of the tag, each of the following lines are equivalent to the one above:
VeNdOr : White Socks Software, Inc. vendor:White Socks Software, Inc. VENDOR : White Socks Software, Inc.

The bottom line is that you can make tag lines as neat or as ugly as you like -- RPM won't mind either way. Note, however, the tag's data may need to be formatted in a particular fashion. If there are any such restrictions, we'll mention them. Below, we've grouped tags of similar functions together for easier reference, starting with the tags that are used to create the package name.

13.2.1 Package Naming Tags
The following tags are used by RPM to produce the package's final name. Since the name is always in the format:
--


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

227

it's only natural that the three tags are known as name, version, and release. The name Tag The name tag is used to define the name of the software being packaged. In most (if not all) cases, the name used for a package should be identical in spelling and case to the software being packaged. The name cannot contain any whitespace: If it does, RPM will only use the first part of the name (up to the first space). Therefore, if the name of the software being packaged is cdplayer, the name tag should be something like:
Name: cdplayer

The version Tag The version tag defines the version of the software being packaged. The version specified should be as close as possible to the format of the original software's version. In most cases, there should be no problem specifying the version just as the software's original developer did. However, there is a restriction. There can be no dashes in the version. If you forget, RPM will remind you:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer Illegal '-' char in version: 1.0-a #

Spaces in the version will also cause problems, in that anything after the first space will be ignored by RPM. Bottom line: Stick with alphanumeric characters and periods, and you'll never have to worry about it. Here's a sample version tag:
Version: 1.2

The release Tag The release tag can be thought of as the package's version. The release is traditionally an integer -- for example, when a specific piece of software at a particular


228

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

version is first packaged, the release should be "1". If it is necessary to repackage that software at the same version, the release should be incremented. When a new version of the software becomes available, the release should drop back to "1" when it is first packaged. Note that we used the word "traditionally", above. The only hard and fast restriction to the release format is that there can be no dashes in it. Be aware that if you buck tradition, your users may not understand what your release means. It is up to the package builder to determine which build represents a new release and to update the release manually. Here is what a typical release tag might look like:
Release: 5

13.2.2 Descriptive Tags
These tags provide information primarily for people who want to know a bit more about the package, and who produced it. They are part of the package file, and most of them can be seen by issuing an rpm -qi command. The %description Tag The %description tag is used to provide an in-depth description of the packaged software. The description should be several sentences describing, to an uninformed user, what the software does. The %description tag is a bit different than the other tags in the preamble. For one, it starts with a percent sign. The other difference is that the data specified by the %description tag can span more than one line. In addition, a primitive formatting capability exists. If a line starts with a space, that line will be displayed verbatim by RPM. Lines that do not start with a space are assumed to be part of a paragraph and will be formatted by RPM. It's even possible to mix and match formatted and unformatted lines. Here are some examples:
%description It slices! It dices! It's a CD player app that can't be beat. By using the resonant frequency of the CD itself, it is able to simulate 20X oversampling. This leads to sound quality that cannot be equaled with


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

229

more mundane software...

The example above contains no explicit formatting. RPM will format the text as a single paragraph, breaking lines as needed.
%description It slices! It dices! It's a CD player app that can't be beat. By using the resonant frequency of the CD itself, it is able to simulate 20X oversampling. This leads to sound quality that cannot be equaled with more mundane software...

In this example, the first three lines will be displayed by RPM, verbatim. The remainder of the text will be formatted by RPM. The text will be formatted as one paragraph.
%description It slices! It dices! It's a CD player app that can't be beat. By using the resonant frequency of the CD itself, it is able to simulate 20X oversampling. This leads to sound quality that cannot be equaled with more mundane software...

Above, we have a similar situation to the previous example, in that part of the text is formatted and part is not. However, the blank line separates the text into two paragraphs. The summary Tag The summary tag is used to define a one-line description of the packaged software. Unlike %description, summary is restricted to one line. RPM uses it when a succinct description of the package is needed. Here is an example of a summary line:
Summary: A CD player app that rocks!


230

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

The copyright Tag The copyright tag is used to define the copyright terms applicable to the software being packaged. In many cases, this might be nothing more than "GPL", for software distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, or something similar. For example:
Copyright: GPL

The distribution Tag The distribution tag is used to define a group of packages, of which this package is a part. Since Red Hat is in the business of producing a group of packages known as a Linux distribution, the name stuck. For example, if a suite of applications known as "Doors '95" were produced, each package that is part of the suite would define its distribution line like this:
Distribution: Doors '95

The icon Tag The icon tag is used to name a file containing an icon representing the packaged software. The file may be in either GIF or XPM format, although XPM is preferred. In either case, the background of the icon should be transparent. The file should be placed in RPM's SOURCES directory prior to performing a build, so no path is needed. The icon is normally used by graphically-oriented front ends to RPM. RPM itself doesn't use the icon, but it's stored in the package file and retained in RPM's database after the package is installed. An example icon tag might look like:
Icon: foo.xpm


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

231

The vendor Tag The vendor tag is used to define the name of the entity that is responsible for packaging the software. Normally, this would be the name of an organization. Here's an example:
Vendor: White Socks Software, Inc.

The url Tag The url tag is used to define a Uniform Resource Locator that can be used to obtain additional information about the packaged software. At present, RPM doesn't actively make use of this tag. The data is stored in the package however, and will be written into RPM's database when the package is installed. It's only a matter of time before some web-based RPM adjunct makes use of this information, so make sure you include URLs! Something like this is all you'll need:
URL: http://www.gnomovision.com/cdplayer.html

The group Tag The group tag is used to group packages together by the types of functionality they provide. The group specification looks like a path and is similar in function, in that it specifies more general groupings before more detailed ones. For example, a package containing a text editor might have the following group:
Group: Applications/Editors

In this example, the package is part of the Editors group, which is itself a part of the Applications group. Likewise, a spreadsheet package might have this group:
Group: Applications/Spreadsheets


232

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

This group tag indicates that under the Applications group, we would find Editors and Spreadsheets, and probably some other subgroups as well. How is this information used? It's primarily meant to permit graphical front-ends to RPM, to display packages in a hierarchical fashion. Of course, in order for groups to be as effective as possible, it's necessary for all package builders to be consistent in their groupings. In the case of packages for Linux, Red Hat has the definitive list. Therefore, Linux package builders should give serious consideration to using Red Hat's groups. The current group hierarchy is installed with every copy of RPM, and is available in the RPM sources as well. Check out the file groups in RPM's documentation directory (normally /usr/doc/rpm-), or in the toplevel source directory. The packager Tag The packager tag is used to hold the name and contact information for the person or persons who built the package. Normally, this would be the person that actually built the package, or in a larger organization, a public relations contact. In either case, contact information such as an e-mail address or phone number should be included, so customers can send either money or hate mail, depending on their satisfaction with the packaged software. Here's an example of a packager tag:
Packager: Fred Foonly

13.2.3 Dependency Tags
One RPM feature that's been recently implemented is a means of ensuring that if a package is installed, the system environment has everything the package requires in order to operate properly. Likewise, when an installed package is erased RPM can make sure no other package relies on the package being erased. This dependency capability can be very helpful when endusers install and erase packages on their own. It makes it more difficult for them to paint themselves into a corner, package-wise. However, in order for RPM to be able to take more than basic dependency information into account, the package builder must add the appropriate dependency information to the package. This is done by using the following tags. Note, however, that adding


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

233

dependency information to a package requires some forethought. For additional information on RPM's dependency processing, please review Chapter 14, Adding Dependency Information to a Package. The provides Tag The provides tag is used to specify a virtual package that the packaged software makes available when it is installed. Normally, this tag would be used when different packages provide equivalent services. For example, any package that allows a user to read mail might provide the mail-reader virtual package. Another package that depends on a mail reader of some sort, could require the mail-reader virtual package. It would then install without dependency problems, if any one of several mail programs were installed. Here's what a provides tag might look like:
Provides: mail-reader

The requires Tag The requires tag is used to alert RPM to the fact that the package needs to have certain capabilities available in order to operate properly. These capabilities refer to the name of another package, or to a virtual package provided by one or more packages that use the provides tag. When the requires tag references a package name, version comparisons may also be included by following the package name with <, >, =, >=, or <=, and a version specification. To get even more specific, a package's release may be included as well. Here's a requires tag in action, with a specific version requirement:
Requires: playmidi = 2.3

If the Requires tag needs to perform a comparison against a serial number defined with the serial tag (described below), then the proper format would be:
Requires: playmidi =S 4


234

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

The conflicts Tag The conflicts tag is the logical complement to the requires tag. The requires tag is used to specify what packages must be present in order for the current package to operate properly. The conflicts tag is used to specify what packages cannot be installed if the current package is to operate properly. The conflicts tag has the same format as the requires tag -- namely, the tag is followed by a real or virtual package name. Like requires, the conflicts tag also accepts version and release specifications:
Conflicts: playmidi = 2.3-1

If the conflicts tag needs to perform a comparision against a serial number defined with the serial tag (described below), then the proper format would be:
Conflicts: playmidi =S 4

The serial Tag The serial tag is another part of RPM's dependency and upgrade processing. The need for it is somewhat obscure, but goes something like this: 1. The package being built (call it package A) uses a version numbering scheme sufficiently obscure so that RPM cannot determine if one version is older or newer than another version. Another package (package B) requires that package A be installed. More specifically, it requires RPM to compare package A's version against a specified minimum (or maximum) version.

2.

Since RPM is unable to compare package A's version against the version specified by package B, there is no way to determine if package B's dependency requirements can be met. What to do? The serial tag provides a way to get around this tricky problem. By specifying a simple integer serial number for each version, you are, in essence, directing how


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

235

RPM interprets the relative age of the package. The key point to keep in mind is that in order for this to work, a unique serial number must be defined for each version of the software being packaged. In addition, the serial number must increment along with the version. Finally, the package that requires the serialized software needs to specify its version requirements in terms of the serial number. Does it sound like a lot of trouble? You're right! If you find yourself in the position of needing to use this tag, take a deep breath and seriously consider changing the way you assign version numbers. If you're packaging someone else's software, perhaps you can convince them to make the change. Chances are, if RPM can't figure out the version number, most people can't, either! An example serial tag would look something like this:
Serial: 4

Note that RPM considers a package with a serial number as newer than a package without a serial number. The autoreqprov Tag The autoreqprov tag is used to control the automatic dependency processing performed when the package is being built. Normally, as each package is built, the following steps are performed: · All executable programs being packaged are analyzed to determine their shared library requirements. These requirements are automatically added to the package's requirements. The soname of each shared library being packaged is automatically added to the package's list of "provides" information.

·

By doing this, RPM reduces the need for package builders to manually add dependency information to their packages. However, there are times when RPM's automatic dependency processing may not be desirable. In those cases the autoreqprov tag can be used to disable automatic dependency processing. To disable automatic dependency processing, add the following line:
AutoReqProv: no


236

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

(The number zero may be used instead of no) Although RPM defaults to performing automatic dependency processing, the effect of the autoreqprov tag can be reversed by changing no to yes. (The number one may be used instead of yes)

13.2.4 Architecture- and Operating System-Specific Tags
As RPM gains in popularity, more people are putting it to work on different types of computer systems. While this would not normally be a problem, things start to get a little tricky when one of the following two situations becomes commonplace: 1. 2. A particular operating system is ported to several different hardware platforms, or architectures. A particular architecture runs several different operating systems.

The real bind hits when RPM is used to package software for several of these different system environments. Without methods of controlling the build process based on architecture and operating system, package builders that develop software for more than one architecture or operating system will have a hard time indeed. The only alternative would be to maintain parallel RPM build environments and accept all the coordination headaches that would entail. Fortunately, RPM makes it all easier than that. With the following tags, it's possible to support package building under multiple environments, all from a single set of sources, patches, and a single spec file. For a more complete discussion of multiarchitecture package building, please see Chapter 19, Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems . The excludearch Tag The excludearch tag directs RPM to ensure that the package does not attempt to build on the excluded architecture(s). The reasons for preventing a package from building on a certain architecture might include: · · The software has not yet been ported to the excluded architecture. The software would serve no purpose on the excluded architecture.


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

237

An example of the first case might be that the software was designed based on the assumption that an integer is a 32-bit quantity. Obviously, this assumption is not valid on a 64-bit processor. In the second case, software that depended on or manipulated low-level features of a given architecture, should be excluded from building on a different architecture. Assembly language programs would fall into this category. One or more architectures may be specified after the excludearch tag, separated by either spaces or commas. Here is an example:
ExcludeArch: sparc alpha

In this example, RPM would not attempt to build the package on either the Sun SPARC or Digital Alpha/AXP architectures. The package would build on any other architectures, however. If a build is attempted on an excluded architecture, the following message will be displayed, and the build will fail:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec Arch mismatch! cdplayer-1.0.spec doesn't build on this architecture #

Note that if your goal is to ensure that a package will only build on one architecture, then you should use the exclusivearch tag. The exclusivearch Tag The exclusivearch tag is used to direct RPM to ensure the package is only built on the specified architecture(s). The reasons for this are similar to the those mentioned in the section on the excludearch tag above. However, the exclusivearch tag is useful when the package builder needs to ensure that only the specified architectures will build the package. This tag ensures that no future architectures will mistakenly attempt to build the package. This would not be the case if the excludearch tag were used to specify every architecture known at the time the package is built. The syntax of the exclusivearch tag is identical to that of excludearch:


238

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

ExclusiveArch: sparc alpha

In this example, the package will only build on a Sun SPARC or Digital Alpha/AXP system. Note that if your goal is to ensure that a package will not build on specific architectures, then you should use the excludearch tag. The excludeos Tag The excludeos tag is used to direct RPM to ensure that the package does not attempt to build on the excluded operating system(s). This is usually necessary when a package is to be built on more than one operating system, but it is necessary to keep a particular operating system from attempting a build. Note that if your goal is to ensure that a package will only build on one operating system, then you should use the exclusiveos tag. Here's a sample excludeos tag:
ExcludeOS: linux irix

The exclusiveos Tag The exclusiveos tag has the same syntax as excludeos, but it has the opposite logic. The exclusiveos tag is used to denote which operating system(s) should only be be permitted to build the package. Here's exclusiveos in action:
ExclusiveOS: linux

Note that if your goal is to ensure that a package will not build on a specific operating system, then you should use the excludeos tag.

13.2.5 Directory-related Tags
A number of tags are used to specify directories and paths that are used in various phases of RPM's build and install processes. There's not much more to say collectively about these tags, so let's dive right in and look them over.


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

239

The prefix Tag The prefix tag is used when a relocatable package is to be built. A relocatable package can be installed normally or can be installed in a user-specified directory, by using RPM's --prefix install-time option. The data specified after the prefix tag should be the part of the package's path that may be changed during installation. For example, if the following prefix line was included in a spec file:
Prefix: /opt

and the following file was specified in the spec file's %files list:
/opt/blather/foonly

then the file foonly would be installed in /opt/blather if the package was installed normally. It would be installed in /usr/local/blather if the package was installed with the --prefix /usr/local option. For more information about creating relocatable packages, see Chapter 15, Making a Relocatable Package. The buildroot Tag The buildroot tag is used to define an alternate build root. The name is a bit misleading, as the build root is actually used when the software is installed during the build process. In order for a build root to be defined and actually used, a number of issues must be taken into account. These issues are covered in Chapter 16, Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere. This is what a buildroot tag would look like:
BuildRoot: /tmp/cdplayer

The buildroot tag can be overridden at build-time by using the --buildroot command-line option.


240

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

13.2.6 Source and Patch Tags
In order to build and package software, RPM needs to know where to find the original sources. But it's not quite that simple. There might be more than one set of sources that need to be part of a particular build. In some cases, it might be necessary to prevent some sources from being packaged. And then there is the matter of patches. It's likely that changes will need to be made to the sources, so it's necessary to specify a patch file. But the same issues that apply to source specifications are also applicable to patches. There might be more than one set of patches required. The tags that follow are crucial to RPM, so it pays to have a firm grasp of how they are used. The source Tag The source tag is central to nearly every spec file. Although it has only one piece of data associated with it, it actually performs two functions: 1. 2. It shows where the software's developer has made the original sources available. It gives RPM the name of the original source file.

While there is no hard and fast rule, for the first function, it's generally considered best to put this information in the form of a Uniform Resource Locator (URL). The URL should point directly to the source file itself. This is due to the source tag's second function. As mentioned above, the source tag also needs to direct RPM to the source file on the build system. How does it do this? There's only one requirement, and it is ironclad: The source filename must be at the end of the line as the final element in a path. Here's an example:
Source: ftp://ftp.gnomovision.com/pub/cdplayer-1.0.tgz

Given this source line, RPM will search its SOURCES directory for cdplayer1.0.tgz. Everything prior to the filename is ignored by RPM. It's there strictly for any interested humans.


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

241

A spec file may contain more than one source tag. This is necessary for those cases where the software being packaged is contained in more than one source file. However, the source tags must be uniquely identified. This is done by appending a number to the end of the tag itself. In fact, RPM does this internally for the first source tag in a spec file, in essence turning it into source0. Therefore, if a package contains two source files, they may either be specified as:
Source: blather-4.5.tar.gz Source1: bother-1.2.tar.gz

or as:
Source0: blather-4.5.tar.gz Source1: bother-1.2.tar.gz

Either approach may be used. The choice is yours. The nosource Tag The nosource tag is used to direct RPM to omit one or more source files from the source package. Why would someone want to go to the trouble of specifying a source file, only to exclude it? The reasons for this can be varied, but let's look at one example: The software known as Pretty Good Privacy, or PGP. PGP contains encryption routines of such high quality that the United States government restricts their export. 1While it would be nice to create a PGP package file, the resulting package could not legally be transferred between the U.S. and other countries, or vice-versa. However, what if all files other than the original source, were packaged using RPM? Well, a binary package made without PGP would be of little use, but what about the source package? It would contain the spec file, maybe some patches, and perhaps even an icon file. Since the controversial PGP software was not a part of the source package, this sanitized source package could be downloaded legally in any country. The person that downloaded a copy could then go about legally obtaining the PGP
1 There is also an "international" version that may be used in non-US countries. See Appendix G, An Introduction to PGP.


242

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

sources themselves, place them in RPM's SOURCES directory, and create a binary package. They wouldn't even need to change the nosource tag. One rpm -ba command later, and the user would have a perfectly usable PGP binary package file. Since there may be more than one source tag in a spec file, the format of the nosource tag is as follows:
nosource: , ...

The represents the number following the source tag. If there is more than one number in the list, they may be separated by either commas or spaces. For example, consider a package containing the following source tags:
source: blather-4.5.tar.gz Source1: bother-1.2.tar.gz source2: blather-lib-4.5.tar.gz source3: bother-lib-1.2.tar.gz

If the source files for blather and blather-lib were not to be included in the package, the following nosource line could be added:
NoSource: 0, 3

What about that 0? Keep in mind that the first unnumbered source tag in a spec file is automatically numbered 0 by RPM. The patch Tag The patch tag is used to identify which patches are associated with the software being packaged. The patch files are kept in RPM's SOURCES directory, so only the name of the patch file should be specified. Here is an example:
Patch: cdp-0.33-fsstnd.patch

There are no hard and fast requirements for naming the patch files, but traditionally the filename starts with the software name and version, separated by dashes. The next part of the patch file name usually includes one or more words indicating the


Section 13.2:Tags: Data Definitions

243

reason for the patch. In our example above, the patch file contains changes necessary to bring the software into compliance with the Linux File System Standard, hence the fsstnd magic incantation. RPM processes patch tags the same way it does source tags. Therefore, it's acceptable to use a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) on a patch line, too. A spec file may contain more than one patch tag. This is necessary for those cases where the software being packaged requires more than one patch. However, the patch tags must be uniquely identified. This is done by appending a number to the end of the tag itself. In fact, RPM does this internally for the first patch tag in a spec file, in essence turning it into patch0. Therefore, if a package contains three patches, the following two methods of specifying them are equivalent:
Patch: blather-4.5-bugfix.patch Patch1: blather-4.5-config.patch Patch2: blather-4.5-somethingelse.patch

This is the same as:
Patch0: blather-4.5-bugfix.patch Patch1: blather-4.5-config.patch Patch2: blather-4.5-somethingelse.patch

Either approach may be used, but the second method looks nicer. The nopatch Tag The nopatch tag is similar to nosource tag, the nopatch the source package. In the case sources. For the nopatch tag, the tag of the nosource tag discussed earlier. Just like the is used to direct RPM to omit something from nosource, that "something" was one or more "something" is one or more patches.

Since each patch tag in a spec file must be numbered, the nopatch tag uses those numbers to specify which patches are not to be included in the package. The nopatch tag is used in this manner:
NoPatch: 2 3


244

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

In this example, the source files specified on the source2 and source3 lines are not to be included in the build. This concludes our study of RPM's tags. In the next section, we'll look at the various scripts that RPM uses to build, as well as to install, and erase, packages.

13.3 Scripts: RPM's Workhorse
The scripts that RPM uses to control the build process are among the most varied and interesting parts of the spec file. Many spec files also contain scripts that perform a variety of tasks whenever the package is installed or erased. The start of each script is denoted by a keyword. For example, the %build keyword marks the start of the script RPM will execute when building the software to be packaged. It should be noted that, in the strictest sense of the word, these parts of the spec file are not scripts. For example, they do not start with the traditional invocation of a shell. However, the contents of each script section are copied into a file and executed by RPM as a full-fledged script. This is part of the power of RPM: Anything that can be done in a script can be done by RPM. Let's start by looking at the scripts used during the build process.

13.3.1 Build-time Scripts
The scripts that RPM uses during the building of a package follow the steps known to every software developer: · · · · Unpacking the sources. Building the software. Installing the software. Cleaning up.

Although each of the scripts perform a specific function in the build process, they share a common environment. Using RPM's --test option 2, we can see the common portion of each script. In the following example, we've taken the cdplayer
2 Described in Section 12.1.11, --test -- Create, Save Build Scripts For Review .


Section 13.3:Scripts: RPM's Workhorse

245

package, issued an rpm -ba --test cdplayer-1.0-1.spec, and viewed the script files left in RPM's temporary directory. This section (with the appropriate package-specific values) is present in every script RPM executes during a build:
#!/bin/sh -e # Script generated by rpm RPM_SOURCE_DIR="/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES" RPM_BUILD_DIR="/usr/src/redhat/BUILD" RPM_DOC_DIR="/usr/doc" RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce" RPM_ARCH="i386" RPM_OS="Linux" RPM_ROOT_DIR="/tmp/cdplayer" RPM_BUILD_ROOT="/tmp/cdplayer" RPM_PACKAGE_NAME="cdplayer" RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION="1.0" RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE="1" set -x umask 022

As we can see, the script starts with the usual invocation of a shell (in this case, the Bourne shell). There are no arguments passed to the script. Next, a number of environment variables are set. Here's a brief description of each one: ·
RPM_SOURCE_DIR -- This environment variable gets its value from the rpmrc file entry sourcedir, which in turn can get part of its value from the topdir entry. It is the path RPM will prepend to the file, specified in the source tag line.

·

-- This variable is based on the builddir rpmrc file entry, which in turn can get part of its value from the topdir entry. This environment variable translates to the path of RPM's build directory, where most software will be unpacked and built.
RPM_BUILD_DIR RPM_DOC_DIR -- The value of this environment variable is based on the defaultdocdir rpmrc file entry. Files marked with the %doc directive can be

·


246

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

installed in a subdirectory of defaultdocdir. For more information on the %doc directive, refer to The %doc Directive in Section 13.6.1. ·
RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- This environment variable gets its value from the optflags rpmrc file entry. It contains options that can be passed on to the build procedures of the software being packaged. Normally this means either a configuration script or the make command itself. RPM_ARCH -- As one might infer from the example above, this environment variable contains a string describing the build system's architecture. RPM_OS

· · ·

-- This one contains the name of the build system's operating system.

RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- This environment variable is used to hold the "build root", into which the newly built software will be installed. If no explicit build root has been specified (either by command line option, spec file tag line, or rpmrc file entry), this variable will be null.

·

-- This environment variable gets its value from the name tag line in the package's spec file. It contains the name of the software being packaged.
RPM_PACKAGE_NAME RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION -- The version tag line is the source of this variable's translation. Predictably, this environment variable contains the software's version number. RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE -- This environment variable contains the package's release number. Its value is obtained from the release tag line in the spec file.

·

·

All of these environment variables are set for your use, to make it easier to write scripts that will do the right thing even if the build environment changes. The script also sets an option that causes the shell to print out each command, complete with expanded arguments. Finally, the default permissions are set. Past this point, the scripts differ. Let's look at the scripts in the order they are executed. The %prep Script The %prep script is the first script RPM executes during a build. Prior to the %prep script, RPM has performed preliminary consistency checks, such as whether the spec


Section 13.3:Scripts: RPM's Workhorse

247

file's source tag points to files that actually exist. Just prior to passing control over to the %prep script's contents, RPM changes directory into RPM's build area, which, by default, is /usr/src/redhat/BUILD. At that point, it is the responsibility of the %prep script to: · · · · Create the top-level build directory. Unpack the original sources into the build directory. Apply patches to the sources, if necessary. Perform any other actions required to get the sources in a ready-to-build state.

The first three items on this list are common to the vast majority of all software being packaged. Because of this, RPM has two macros that greatly simplify these routine functions. More information on RPM's %setup and %patch macros can be found in Section 13.4, Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders. The last item on the list can include creating directories or anything else required to get the sources in a ready-to-build state. As a result, a %prep script can range from one line invoking a single %setup macro, to many lines of tricky shell programming. The %build Script The %build script picks up where the %prep script left off. Once the %prep script has gotten everything ready for the build, the %build script is usually somewhat anti-climactic -- normally invoking make, maybe a configuration script, and little else. Like %prep before it, the %build script has the same assortment of environment variables to draw on. Also, like %prep, %build changes directory into the software's top-level build directory (located in RPM_BUILD_DIR, or usually called -). Unlike %prep, there are no macros available for use in the %build script. The reason is simple: Either the commands required to build the software are simple (such as a single make command), or they are so unique that a macro wouldn't make it easier to write the script.


248

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

The %install Script The environment in which the %install script executes is identical to the other scripts. Like the other scripts, the %install script's working directory is set to the software's top-level directory. As the name implies, it is this script's responsibility to do whatever is necessary to actually install the newly built software. In most cases, this means a single make install command, or a few commands to copy files and create directories. The %clean Script The %clean script, as the name implies, is used to clean up the software's build directory tree. RPM normally does this for you, but in certain cases (most notably in those packages that use a build root) you'll need to include a %clean script. As usual, the %clean script has the same set of environment variables as the other scripts we've covered here. Since a %clean script is normally used when the package is built in a build root, the RPM_BUILD_ROOT environment variable is particularly useful. In many cases, a simple
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

will suffice.

3

13.3.2 Install/Erase-time Scripts
The other type of scripts that are present in the spec file are those that are only used when the package is either installed or erased. There are four scripts, each one meant to be executed at different times during the life of a package: · · · · Before installation. After installation. Before erasure. After erasure.

3 Keep in mind that this command in a %clean script can wreak havoc if used with a build root of, say, /. Using --buildroot Can Bite You! in Section 12.1.13 discusses this in more detail.


Section 13.3:Scripts: RPM's Workhorse

249

Unlike the build-time scripts, there is little in the way of environment variables for these scripts. The only environment variable available is RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX, and that is only set if the package uses an installation prefix. Unlike the build-time scripts, there is an argument defined. The sole argument to these scripts, is a number representing the number of instances of the package currently installed on the system, after the current package has been installed or erased. Sound tricky? It really isn't. Here's an example: Assume that a package, called blather-1.0, is being installed. No previous versions of blather have been installed. Since the software is being installed, only the %pre and %post scripts are executed. The argument passed to these scripts will be 1, since the the number of blather packages installed is 1. 4 Continuing our example, a new version of the blather package, version 1.3, is now available. Clearly it's time to upgrade. What will the scripts' values be during the upgrade? As blather-1.3 is installing, its %pre and %post scripts will have an argument equal to 2 (1 for version 1.0 already installed, plus 1 for version 1.3 being installed). As the final part of the upgrade, it's then time to erase blather version 1.0. As the package is being removed, its %preun and %postun scripts are executed. Since there will be only one blather package (version 1.3) installed after version 1.0 is erased, the argument passed to version 1.0's scripts is 1. To finally bring an end to this example, we've decided to erase blather 1.3. We just don't need it anymore. As the package is being erased, its %preun and %postun scripts will be executed. Since there will be no blather packages installed once the erase completes, the argument passed to the scripts is 0. With all that said, of what possible use would this argument be? Well, it has two very interesting properties: 1. When the first version of a package is installed, its %pre and %post scripts will be passed an argument equal to 1.

4 Or it will be 1, once the package is completely installed. Remember, the number is based on the number of packages installed after the current package's install or erase has completed.


250

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

2.

When the last version of a package is erased, its %preun and %postun scripts will be passed an argument equal to 0.

Based on these properties, it's trivial to write an install-time script that can take certain actions in specific circumstances. Usually, the argument is used in the %preun or %postun scripts to perform a special task when the last instance of a package is being erased. What is normally done during these scripts? The exact tasks may vary, but in general, the tasks are any that need to be performed at these points in the package's existence. One very common task is to run ldconfig when shared libraries are installed or removed. But that's not the only use for these scripts. It's even possible to use the scripts to perform tests to ensure the package install/erasure should proceed. Since each of these scripts will be executing on whatever system installs the package, it's necessary to choose the script's choice of tools carefully. Unless you're sure a given program is going to be available on all the systems that could possibly install your package, you should not use it in these scripts. The %pre Script The %pre script executes just before the package is to be installed. It is the rare package that requires anything to be done prior to installation; none of the 350 packages that comprise Red Hat Linux Linux 4.0 make use of it.
The %post Script

The %post script executes after the package has been installed. One of the most popular reasons a %post script is needed is to run ldconfig to update the list of available shared libraries after a new one has been installed. Of course, other functions can be performed in a %post script. For example, packages that install shells use the %post script to add the shell name to /etc/shells. If a package uses a %post script to perform some function, quite often it will include a %postun script that performs the inverse of the %post script, after the package has been removed.


Section 13.3:Scripts: RPM's Workhorse

251

The %preun Script If there's a time when your package needs to have one last look around before the user erases it, the place to do it is in the %preun script. Anything that a package needs to do immediately prior to RPM taking any action to erase the package, can be done here. The %postun Script The %postun script executes after the package has been removed. It is the last chance for a package to clean up after itself. Quite often, %postun scripts are used to run ldconfig to remove newly erased shared libraries from ld.so.cache.

13.3.3 Verification-Time Script -- The %verifyscript Script
The %verifyscript executes whenever the installed package is verified by RPM's verification command. The contents of this script is entirely up to the package builder, but in general the script should do whatever is necessary to verify the package's proper installation. Since RPM automatically verifies the existence of a package's files, along with other file attributes, the %verifyscript should concentrate on different aspects of the package's installation. For example, the script may ensure that certain configuration files contain the proper information for the package being verified:
for n in ash bsh; do echo -n "Looking for $n in /etc/shells... " if ! grep "^/bin/${n}\$" /etc/shells > /dev/null; then echo "missing" echo "${n} missing from /etc/shells" >&2 else echo "found" fi done

In this script, the config file /etc/shells, is checked to ensure that it has entries for the shells provided by this package.


252

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

It is worth noting that the script sends informational and error messages to stdout, and error messages only to stderr. Normally RPM will only display error output from a verification script; the output sent to stdout is only displayed when the verification is run in verbose mode.

13.4 Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders
RPM does not support macros in the sense of ad-hoc sequences of commands being defined as a macro and executed by simply referring to the macro name. However, there are two parts of RPM's build process that are fairly constant from one package to another, and they are the unpacking and patching of sources. Because of this, RPM makes two macros available to simplify these tasks: 1. 2. The %setup macro, which is used to unpack the original sources. The %patch macro, which is used to apply patches to the original sources.

These macros are used exclusively in the %prep script; it wouldn't make sense to use them anywhere else. The use of these macros is not mandatory -- It is certainly possible to write a %prep script without them. But in the vast majority of cases they make life easier for the package builder.

13.4.1 The %setup Macro
As we mentioned above, the %setup macro is used to unpack the original sources, in preparation for the build. In its simplest form, the macro is used with no options and gets the name of the source archive from the source tag specified earlier in the spec file. Let's look at an example. The cdplayer package has the following source tag:
Source: ftp://ftp.gnomovision.com/pub/cdplayer/cdplayer-1.0.tgz

and the following %prep script:
%prep %setup

In this simple case, the %setup macro expands into the following commands:


Section 13.4:Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders

253

cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd cdplayer-1.0 cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

As we can see, the %setup macro starts by changing directory into RPM's build area and removing any cdplayer build trees from previous builds. It then uses gzip to uncompress the original source (whose name was taken from the source tag), and pipes the result to tar for unpacking. The return status of the unpacking is tested. If sucessful, the macro continues. At this point, the original sources have been unpacked. The %setup macro continues by changing directory into cdplayer's top-level directory. The two cd commands are an artifact of %setup's macro expansion. Finally, %setup makes sure every file in the build tree is owned by root and has appropriate permissions set. But that's just the simplest way that %setup can be used. There are a number of other options that can be added to accomodate different situations. Let's look at them. -n -- Set Name of Build Directory In our example above, the %setup macro simply uncompressed and unpacked the sources. In this case, the tar file containing the original sources was created such that the top-level directory was included in the tar file. The name of the top-level directory was also identical to that of the tar file, which was in - format. However, this is not always the case. Quite often, the original sources unpack into a directory whose name is different than the original tar file. Since RPM assumes the directory will be called -, when the directory is called something else, it's necessary to use %setup's -n option. Here's an example:


254

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

Assume, for a moment, that the cdplayer sources, when unpacked, create a top-level directory named cd-player. In this case, our %setup line would look like this:
%setup -n cd-player

and the resulting commands would look like this:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cd-player gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd cd-player cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cd-player chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

The results are identical to using %setup with no options, except for the fact that %setup now does a recursive delete on the directory cd-player (instead of cdplayer1.0), and changes directory into cd-player (instead of cdplayer-1.0). Note that all subsequent build-time scripts will change directory into the directory specified by the -n option. This makes -n unsuitable as a means of unpacking sources in directories other than the top-level build directory. In the upcoming example on Using %setup in a Multi-source Spec File in Section 13.4.1, we'll show a way around this restriction. A quick word of warning: If the name specified with the -n option doesn't match the name of the directory created when the sources are unpacked, the build will stop pretty quickly, so it pays to be careful when using this option. -c -- Create Directory (and change to it) Before Unpacking How many times have you grabbed a tar file and unpacked it, only to find that it splattered files all over your current directory? Sometimes source archives are created without a top-level directory. As you can see from the examples so far, %setup expects the archive to create its own top-level directory. If this isn't the case, you'll need to use the -c option.


Section 13.4:Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders

255

This option simply creates the directory and changes directory into it before unpacking the sources. Here's what it looks like:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 mkdir -p cdplayer-1.0 cd cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

The only changes from using %setup with no options, are the mkdir and cd commands, prior to the commands that unpack the sources. Note that you can use the -n option along with -c, so something like %setup -c -n blather works as expected. -D -- Do Not Delete Directory Before Unpacking Sources The -D option keeps the %setup macro from deleting the software's top-level directory. This option is handy when the sources being unpacked are to be added to an already-existing directory tree. This would be the case when more than one %setup macro is used. Here's what %setup does when the -D option is employed:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd cdplayer-1.0 cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

As advertised, the rm prior to the tar command is gone.


256

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

-T -- Do Not Perform Default Archive Unpacking The -T option disables %setup's normal unpacking of the archive file specified on the source0 line. Here's what the resulting commands look like:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 cd cdplayer-1.0 cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

Doesn't make much sense, does it? There's a method to this madness. We'll see the -T in action in the next section. -b -- Unpack The nth Sources Before Changing Directory The -b option is used in conjunction with the source tag. Specifically, it is used to identify which of the numbered source tags in the spec file are to be unpacked. The -b option requires a numeric argument matching an existing source tag. If a numeric argument is not provided, the build will fail:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer Need arg to %setup -b Build failed. #

Remembering that the first source tag is implicitly numbered 0, let's see what happens when the %setup line is changed to %setup -b 0:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi


Section 13.4:Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders

257

cd cdplayer-1.0 cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

That's strange. realize that this unpacking, and to go together,

The sources were unpacked twice. It doesn't make sense, until you is why there is a -T option. Since -T disables the default source file -b selects a particular source file to be unpacked, the two are meant like this:

%setup -T -b 0

Looking at the resulting commands, we find:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd cdplayer-1.0 cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

That's more like it! Let's go on to the next option. -a -- Unpack The nth Sources After Changing Directory The -a option works similarly to the -b option, except that the sources are unpacked after changing directory into the top-level build directory. Like the -b option, -a requires -T in order to prevent two sets of unpacking commands. Here are the commands that a %setup -T -a 0 line would produce:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 cd cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $?


258

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

fi cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

Note that there is no mkdir command to create the top-level directory prior to issuing a cd into it. In our example, adding the -c option will make things right:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 mkdir -p cdplayer-1.0 cd cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

The result is the proper sequence of commands for unpacking a tar file with no top-level directory. Using %setup in a Multi-source Spec File If all these interrelated options seem like overkill for unpacking a single source file, you're right. The real reason for the various options is to make it easier to combine several separate source archives into a single, build-able entity. Let's see how they work in that type of environment. For the purposes of this example, our spec file will have the following three source tags: 5
source: source-zero.tar.gz source1: source-one.tar.gz source2: source-two.tar.gz 5 Yes, the source tags should include a URL pointing to the sources.


Section 13.4:Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders

259

To unpack the first source is not hard; all that's required is to use %setup with no options:
%setup

This produces the following set of commands:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-zero.tar.gz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd cdplayer-1.0 cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

If source-zero.tar.gz didn't include a top-level directory, we could have made one by adding the -c option:
%setup -c

which would result in:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 mkdir -p cdplayer-1.0 cd cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-zero.tar.gz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

Of course, if the top-level directory did not match the package name, the -n option could have been added:


260

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

%setup -n blather

which results in:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf blather gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-zero.tar.gz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd blather cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/blather chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

or
%setup -c -n blather

This results in:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf blather mkdir -p blather cd blather gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-zero.tar.gz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/blather chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .

Now let's add the second source file. Things get a bit more interesting here. First, we need to identify which source tag (and therefore, which source file) we're talking about. So we need to use either the -a or -b option, depending on the characteristics of the source archive. For this example, let's say that -a is the option we want. Adding that option, plus a "1" to point to the source file specified in the source1 tag, we have:


Section 13.4:Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders

261

%setup -a 1

Since we've already seen that using the -a or -b option results in duplicate unpacking, we need to disable the default unpacking by adding the -T option:
%setup -T -a 1

Next, we need to make sure that the top-level directory isn't deleted. Otherwise, the first source file we just unpacked would be gone. That means we need to include the -D option to prevent that from happening. Adding this final option, and including the now complete macro in our %prep script, we now have:
%setup %setup -T -D -a 1

This will result in the following commands:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-zero.tar.gz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd cdplayer-1.0 cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w . cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD cd cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-one.tar.gz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w .


262

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

So far, so good. Let's include the last source file, but with this one, we'll say that it needs to be unpacked in a subdirectory of cdplayer-1.0 called database. Can we use %setup in this case? We could, if source-two.tgz created the database subdirectory. If not, then it'll be necessary to do it by hand. For the purposes of our example, let's say that source-two.tgz wasn't created to include the database subdirectory, so we'll have to do it ourselves. Here's our %prep script now:
%setup %setup -T -D -a 1 mkdir database cd database gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-two.tar.gz | tar -xvvf -

Here's the resulting script:
cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-zero.tar.gz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi cd cdplayer-1.0 cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 chown -R root.root . chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w . cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD cd cdplayer-1.0 gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-one.tar.gz | tar -xvvf if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit $? fi mkdir database cd database gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/source-two.tar.gz | tar -xvvf -

The three commands we added to unpack the last set of sources were added to the end of the %prep script.


Section 13.4:Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders

263

The bottom line to using the %setup macro is that you can probably get it to do what you want, but don't be afraid to tinker. And even if %setup can't be used, it's easy enough to add the necessary commands to do the work manually. Above all, make sure you use the --test option when testing your %setup macros, so you can see what commands they're translating to. Next, let's look at RPM's second macro, %patch.

13.4.2 The %patch Macro
The %patch macro, as its name implies, is used to apply patches to the unpacked sources. In the following examples, our spec file has the following patch tag lines:
patch0: patch-zero patch1: patch-one patch2: patch-two

At its simplest, the %patch macro can be invoked without any options:
%patch

Here are the resulting commands:
echo "Patch #0:" patch -p0 -s < /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/patch-zero

The %patch macro nicely displays a message showing that a patch is being applied, then invokes the patch command to actually do the dirty work. There are two options to the patch command: 1. The -p option, which directs patch to remove the specified number of slashes (and any intervening directories) from the front of any filenames specified in the patch file. In this case, nothing will be removed. The -s option, which directs patch to apply the patch without displaying any informational messages. Only errors from patch will be displayed.

2.


264

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

How did the %patch macro know which patch to apply? Keep in mind that, like the source tag lines, every patch tag is numbered, starting at zero. The %patch macro, by default, applies the patch file named on the patch (or patch0) tag line. Specifying Which patch Tag to Use The %patch macro actually has two different ways to specify the patch tag line it is to use. The first method is to simply append the number of the desired patch tag to the end of the %patch macro itself. For example, in order to apply the patch specified on the patch2 tag line, the following %patch macro could be used:
%patch2

The other approach is to use the -P option. This option is followed by the number of the patch tag line desired. Therefore, this line is identical in function to the previous one:
%patch -P 2

Note that the -P option will not apply the file specified on the patch0 line, by default. Therefore, if you choose to use the -P option to specify patch numbers, you'll need to use the following format when applying patch zero:
%patch -P 0

-p <#> -- Strip <#> leading slashes and directories from patch filenames The -p (Note the lowercase "p"!) option is sent directly to the patch command. It is followed by a number, which specifies the number of leading slashes (and the directories in between) to strip from any filenames present in the patch file. For more information on this option, please consult the patch man page. -b -- Set the backup file extension to When the patch command is used to apply a patch, unmodified copies of the files patched are renamed to end with the extension .orig. The -b option is used to


Section 13.4:Macros: Helpful Shorthand for Package Builders

265

change the extension used by patch. This is normally done when multiple patches are to be applied to a given file. By doing this, copies of the file as it existed prior to each patch, are readily available. -E -- Remove Empty Output Files The -E option is passed directly to the patch program. When patch is run with the -E option, any output files that are empty after the patches have been applied, are removed. Now let's take %patch on a test-drive, and put it through its paces. An example of the %patch Macro in Action Using the example patch tag lines we've used throughout this section, let's put together an example and look at the resulting commands. In our example, the first patch to be applied needs to have the root directory stripped. Its %patch macro will look like this:
%patch -p1

The next patch is to be applied to files in the software's lib subdirectory, so we'll need to add a cd command to get us there. We'll also need to strip an additional directory:
cd lib %patch -P 1 -p2

Finally, the last patch is to be applied from the software's top-level directory, so we need to cd back up a level. In addition, this patch modifies some files that were also patched the first time, so we'll need to change the backup file extension:
cd .. %patch -P 2 -p1 -b .last-patch

Here's what the %prep script (minus any %setup macros) looks like:
%patch -p1 cd lib


266

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

%patch -P 1 -p2 cd .. %patch -P 2 -p1 -b .last-patch

And here's what the macros expand to:
echo "Patch #0:" patch -p1 -s < /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/patch-zero cd lib echo "Patch #1:" patch -p2 -s < /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/patch-one cd .. echo "Patch #2:" patch -p1 -b .last-patch -s < /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/patch-two

No surprises here. Note that the %setup macro leaves the current working directory set to the software's top-level directory, so our cd commands with their relative paths will do the right thing. Of course, we have environment variables available that could be used here, too.
Compressed Patch Files

If a patch file is compressed with gzip, RPM will automatically decompress it before applying the patch. Here's a compressed patch file as specified in the spec file:
Patch: bother-3.5-hack.patch.gz

This is part of the script RPM will execute when the %prep section is executed:
echo Executing: %prep ... echo "Patch #0:" gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/bother-3.5-hack.patch.gz | patch -p1 ...

-s

First, the patch file is decompressed using gzip. The output from gzip is then piped into patch. That's about it for RPM's macros. Next, let's take a look at the %files list.


Section 13.6:Directives For the %files list

267

13.5 The %files List
The %files aged. The list preceeding it. are discussed list indicates to RPM which files on the build system are to be packconsists of one file per line. The file may have one or more directives These directives give RPM additional information about the file and more fully below.

Normally, each file includes its full path. The path performs two functions. First, it specifies the file's location on the build system. Second, it denotes where the file should be placed when the package is to be installed. 6 For packages that create directories containing hundreds of files, it can be quite cumbersome creating a list that contains every file. To make this situation a bit easier, if the %files list contains a path to a directory, RPM will automatically package every file in that directory, as well as every file in each subdirectory. Shell-style globbing can also be used in the %files list.

13.6 Directives For the %files list
The %files list may contain a number of different directives. They are used to: · · · · Identify documentation and configuration files. Ensure that a file has the correct permissions and ownership set. Control which aspects of a file are to be checked during package verification. Eliminate some of the tedium in creating the %files list.

In the %files list, one or more directives may be placed on a line, separated by spaces, before one or more filenames. Therefore, if %foo and %bar are two %files list directives, they may be applied to a file baz in the following manner:
%foo %bar baz

Now it's time to take a look at the directives that inhabit the %files list.
6 This is not entirely the case when a relocatable package is being built. For more information on relocatable packages, see Chapter 15, Making a Relocatable Package.


268

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

13.6.1 File-related Directives
RPM processes files differently according to their type. However, RPM does not have a method of automatically determining file types. Therefore, it is up to the package builder to appropriately mark files in the %files list. This is done using one of the directives below. Keep in mind that not every file will need to be marked. As you read the following sections, you'll see that directives are only used in special circumstances. In most packages, the majority of files in the %files list will not need to be marked. The %doc Directive The %doc directive flags the filename(s) that follow, as being documentation. RPM keeps track of documentation files in its database, so that a user can easily find information about an installed package. In addition, RPM can create a package-specific documentation directory during installation and copy documentation into it. Whether or not this additional step is taken, is dependent on how a file is specified. Here is an example:
%doc README %doc /usr/local/foonly/README

The file README exists in the software's top-level directory during the build, and is included in the package file. When the package is installed, RPM creates a directory in the documentation directory named the same as the package (ie, --), and copies the README file there. The newly created directory and the README file are marked in the RPM database as being documentation. The default documentation directory is /usr/doc, and can be changed by setting the defaultdocdir rpmrc file entry. For more information on rpmrc files, please see Appendix B, The rpmrc File. The file /usr/local/foonly/README was installed into that directory during the build and is included in the package file. When the package is installed, the README file is copied into /usr/local/foonly and marked in the RPM database as being documentation.


Section 13.6:Directives For the %files list

269

The %config Directive The %config directive is used to flag the specified file as being a configuration file. RPM performs additional processing for config files when packages are erased, and during installations and upgrades. This is due to the nature of config files: They are often changed by the system administrator, and those changes should not be lost. There is a restriction to the %config directive, and that restriction is that no more than one filename may follow the %config. This means that the following example is the only allowable way to specify config files:
%config /etc/foonly

Note that the full path to the file, as it is installed at build time, is required. The %attr Directive The %attr directive permits finer control over three key file attributes: 1. 2. 3. The file's permissions, or "mode". The file's user ID. The file's group ID.

The %attr directive has the following format:
%attr(, , ) file

The mode is specified in the traditional numeric format, while the user and group are specifed as a string, such as "root". Here's a sample %attr directive:
%attr(755, root, root) foo.bar

This would set foo.bar's permissions to 755. The file would be owned by user root, group root. If a particular attribute does not need to be specified (usually because the file is installed with that attribute set properly), then that attribute may be replaced with a dash:
%attr(755, -, root) foo.bar


270

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

The main reason to use the %attr directive is to permit users without root access to build packages. The techniques for doing this (and a more in-depth discussion of the %attr directive) can be found in Chapter 16, Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere. The %verify Directive RPM's ability to verify the integrity of the software it has installed is impressive. But sometimes it's a bit too impressive. After all, RPM can verify as many as nine different aspects of every file. The %verify directive can control which of these file attributes are to be checked when an RPM verification is done. Here are the attributes, along with the names used by the %verify directive: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Owner (owner) Group (group) Mode (mode) MD5 Checksum (md5) Size (size) Major Number (maj) Minor Number (min) Symbolic Link String (symlink) Modification Time (mtime)

How is %verify used? Say, for instance, that a package installs device files. Since the owner of a device will change, it doesn't make sense to have RPM verify the device file's owner/group and give out a false alarm. Instead, the following %verify directive could be used:
%verify(mode md5 size maj min symlink mtime) /dev/ttyS0


Section 13.6:Directives For the %files list

271

We've left out owner and group, since we'd rather RPM not verify those.

7

However, if all you want to do is prevent RPM from verifying one or two attributes, you can use %verify's alternate syntax:
%verify(not owner group) /dev/ttyS0

This use of %verify produces identical results to the previous example.

13.6.2 Directory-related Directives
While the two directives in this section perform different functions, each is related to directories in some way. Let's see what they do: The %docdir Directive The %docdir directive is used to add a directory to the list of directories that will contain documentation. RPM includes the directories /usr/doc, /usr/info, and /usr/man in the %docdir list by default. For example, if the following line is part of the %files list:
%docdir /usr/blather

any files in the %files list that RPM packages from /usr/blather will be included in the package as usual, but will also be automatically flagged as documentation. This directive is handy when a package creates its own documentation directory and contains a large number of files. Let's give it a try by adding the following line to our spec file:
%docdir /usr/blather

Our %files list contains no references to the several files the package installs in the /usr/blather directory. After building the package, looking at the package's file list shows:
7 RPM will automatically exclude file attributes from verification if it doesn't make sense for the type of file. In our example, getting the MD5 checksum of a device file is an example of such a situation.


272

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

# rpm -qlp ../RPMS/i386/blather-1.0-1.i386.rpm ... #

Wait a minute: There's nothing there, not even /usr/blather! What happened? The problem is that %docdir only directs RPM to mark the specified directory as holding documentation. It doesn't direct RPM to package any files in the directory. To do that, we need to clue RPM in to the fact that there are files in the directory that must be packaged. One way to do this is to simply add the files to the %files list:
%docdir /usr/blather /usr/blather/INSTALL

Looking at the package, we see that INSTALL was packaged:
# rpm -qlp ../RPMS/i386/blather-1.0-1.i386.rpm ... /usr/blather/INSTALL #

Directing RPM to only show the documentation files, we see that INSTALL has indeed been marked as documentation, even though the %doc directive had not been used:
# rpm -qdp ../RPMS/i386/blather-1.0-1.i386.rpm ... /usr/blather/INSTALL #

Of course, if you go to the trouble of adding each file to the %files list, it wouldn't be that much more work to add %doc to each one. So the way to get the most benefit from %docdir is to add another line to the %files list:
%docdir /usr/blather /usr/blather


Section 13.6:Directives For the %files list

273

Since the first line directs RPM to flag any file in /usr/blather as being documentation, and the second line tells RPM to automatically package any files found in /usr/blather, every single file in there will be packaged and marked as documentation:
# rpm -qdp ../RPMS/i386/blather-1.0-1.i386.rpm /usr/blather /usr/blather/COPYING /usr/blather/INSTALL /usr/blather/README ... #

The %docdir directive can save quite a The only caveat is that you must be sure want marked as documentation. Keep in %docdir'ed directory will be marked as

bit of effort in creating the %files list. the directory will only contain files you mind, also, that all subdirectories of the documentation directories, too.

The %dir Directive As we mentioned in Section 13.5, The %files List, if a directory is specified in the %files list, the contents of that directory, and the contents of every directory under it, will automatically be included in the package. While this feature can be handy (assuming you are sure that every file under the directory should be packaged) there are times when this could be a problem. The way to get around this, is to use the %dir directive. By adding this directive to the line containing the directory, RPM will package only the directory itself, regardless of what files are in the directory at the time the package is created. Here's an example of %dir in action. The blather-1.0 package creates the directory /usr/blather as part of its build. It also puts several files in that directory. In the spec file, the /usr/blather directory is included in the %files list:
%files ... /usr/blather ...


274

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

There are no other entries in the %files list that have /usr/blather as part of their path. After building the package, we use RPM to look at the files in the package:
# rpm -qlp ../RPMS/i386/blather-1.0-1.i386.rpm ... /usr/blather /usr/blather/COPYING /usr/blather/INSTALL /usr/blather/README ... #

The files present in /usr/blather at the time the package was built were included in the package automatically, without entering their names in the %files list. However, after changing the /usr/blather line in the %files list to:
%dir /usr/blather

and rebuilding the package, a listing of the package's files now includes only the /usr/blather directory:
# rpm -qlp ../RPMS/i386/blather-1.0-1.i386.rpm ... /usr/blather ... #

-f -- Read the %files The -f option is used to direct RPM Like the %files list in a spec file, the one filename per line and also include

List From to read the %files list from the named file. file named using the -f option should contain any of the directives named in this section.

Why is it necessary to read filenames from a file rather than have the filenames in the spec file? Here's a possible reason: The filenames' paths may contain a directory name that can only be determined at build-time, such as an architecture specification. The list of files, minus the variable


Section 13.7:The Lone Directive: %package

275

part of the path, can be created, and sed can be used at build-time to update the path appropriately. It's not necessary that every filename to be packaged reside in the file. If there are any filenames present in the spec file, they will be packaged as well:
%files latex -f tetex-latex-skel /usr/bin/latex /usr/bin/pslatex ...

Here, the filenames present in the file tetex-latex-skel would be packaged, followed by every filename following the %files line.

13.7 The Lone Directive: %package
While every directive we've seen so far is used in the %files list, the %package directive is different. It is used to permit the creation of more than one package per spec file and can appear at any point in the spec file. These additional packages are known as subpackages. Subpackages are named according to the contents of the line containing the %package directive. The format of the package directive is:
%package:

The should be a name that describes the subpackage. This string is appended to the base package name to produce the subpackage's name. For example, if a spec file contains a name tag value of "foonly", and a "%package doc" line, then the subpackage name will be foonly-doc.

13.7.1 -n -- Use As the Entire Subpackage Name
As we mentioned above, the name of a subpackage normally includes the main package name. When the -n option is added to the %package directive, it directs RPM to use the name specified on the %package line as the entire package name. In the example above, the following %package line would create a subpackage named foonly-doc:


276

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

%package doc

The following %package line would create a subpackage named doc:
%package -n doc

The %package directive plays another role in subpackage building. That role is to act as a place to collect tags that are specific to a given subpackage. Any tag placed after a %package directive will only apply to that subpackage. Finally, the name string specified by the %package directive is also used to denote which parts of the spec file are a part of that subpackage. This is done by including the string (along with the -n option, if present on the %package line) on the starting line of the section that is to be subpackage-specific. Here's an example:
... %package -n bar ... %post -n bar ...

In this heavily edited spec file segment, a subpackage called bar has been defined. Later in the file is a post-install script. Because it has subpackage bar's name on the %post line, the post-install script will be part of the bar subpackage only. For more information on building subpackages, please see Chapter 18, Creating Subpackages.

13.8 Conditionals
While the "exclude" and "exclusive" tags (excludearch, exclusivearch, excludeos, and exclusiveos) provide some control over whether a package will be built on a given architecture and/or operating system, that control is still rather coarse. For example, what should be done if a package will build under multiple architectures, but requires slightly different %build scripts? Or what if a package requires


Section 13.8:Conditionals

277

a certain set of files under one operating system, and an entirely different set under another operating system? The architecture and operating system-specific tags we've discussed earlier in the chapter do nothing to help in such situations. What can be done? One approach would be to simply create different spec files for each architecture or operating system. While it would certainly work, this approach has some problems: · More work. The existence of multiple spec files for a given package means that the effort required to make any changes to the package is multiplied by however many different spec files there are. More chance for mistakes. If any work needs to be done to the spec files, the fact they are separate means it is that much easier to forget to make the necessary changes to each one. There is also the chance of introducing mistakes each time changes are made.

·

The other approach is to somehow permit the conditional inclusion of architecture- or operating system-specific sections of the spec file. Fortunately, the RPM designers chose this approach, and it makes multi-platform package building easier and less prone to mistakes. We discuss multi-platform package building in depth in Chapter 19, Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems . For now, let's take a quick look at RPM's conditionals.

13.8.1 The %ifarch Conditional
The %ifarch conditional is used to begin a section of the spec file that is architecture-specific. It is followed by one or more architecture specifiers, each separated by commas or whitespace. Here is an example:
%ifarch i386 sparc

The contents of the spec file following this line would be processed only by Intel x86 or Sun SPARC-based systems. However, if only this line were placed in a spec file, this is what would happen if a build was attempted:


278

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File

# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec Unclosed %if Build failed. #

The problem that surfaced here is that any conditional must be "closed" by using either %else or %endif. We'll be covering them a bit later in the chapter.

13.8.2 The %ifnarch Conditional
The %ifnarch conditional is used in a similar fashion to %ifarch, except that the logic is reversed. If a spec file contains a conditional block starting with %ifarch alpha, that block would be processed only if the build was being done on a Digital Alpha/AXP-based system. However, if the conditional block started with %ifnarch alpha, then that block would be processed only if the build were not being done on an Alpha. Like %ifarch, %ifnarch can be followed by one or more architectures and must be closed by a %else or %endif.

13.8.3 The %ifos Conditional
The %ifos conditional is used to control RPM's spec file processing based on the build system's operating system. It is followed by one or more operating system names. A conditional block started with %ifos must be closed by a %else or %endif. Here's an example:
%ifos linux

The contents of the spec file following this line would be processed only if the build was done on a linux system.

13.8.4 The %ifnos Conditional
The %ifnos conditional is the logical complement to %ifos: that is, if a conditional starting with the line %ifnos irix is present in a spec file, then the file contents after the %ifnos will not be processed if the build system is running Irix. As always, a conditional block starting with %ifnos must be closed by a %else or %endif.


Section 13.8:Conditionals

279

13.8.5 The %else Conditional
The %else conditional is placed between a %if conditional of some persuasion, and a %endif. It is used to create two blocks of spec file statements, only one of which will be used in any given case. Here's an example:
%ifarch alpha make RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -I ." %else make RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %endif

When a build is performed on a Digital Alpha/AXP, some additional flags are added to the make command. On all other systems, these flags are not added.

13.8.6 The %endif Conditional
A %endif is used to end a conditional block of spec file statements. It can follow one of the %if conditionals, or the %else. The %endif is always needed after a conditional, otherwise the build will fail. Here's short conditional block, ending with a %endif:
%ifarch i386 make INTELFLAG=-DINTEL %endif

In this example, we see the conditional block started with a %ifarch and ended with a %endif. Now that we have some more in-depth knowledge of the spec file, let's take a look at some of RPM's additional features. In the next chapter, we'll explore how to add dependency information to a package.


280

Chapter 13:Inside the Spec File


Section 14.1:An Overview of Dependencies

281

14 Adding Dependency Information to a Package
Since the very first version of RPM hit the streets, one of the side effects of RPM's ease of use was that it made it easier for people to break things. Since RPM made it so simple to erase packages, it became common for people to joyfully erase packages until something broke. Usually this only bit people once, but even once was too much of a hassle if it could be prevented. With this in mind, the RPM developers gave RPM the ability to: · · · Build packages that contain information on the capabilities they require. Build packages that contain information on the capabilities they provide. Store this "provides" and "requires" information in the RPM database.

In addition, they made sure RPM was able to display dependency information, as well as to warn users if they were attempting to do something that would break a package's dependency requirements. With these features in place, it became more difficult for someone to unknowingly erase a package and wreak havoc on their system.

14.1 An Overview of Dependencies
We've already alluded to the underlying concept for RPM's dependency processing. It is based on two key factors: · · Packages advertise what capabilities they provide. Packages advertise what capabilities they require.

By simply checking these two types of information, many possible problems can be avoided. For example, if a package requires a capability that is not provided by any already-installed package, that package cannot be installed and expected to work properly.


282

Chapter 14:Adding Dependency Information to a Package

On the other hand, if a package is to be erased, but its capabilities are required by other installed packages, then it cannot be erased without causing other packages to fail. As you might imagine, it's not quite that simple. But adding dependency information can be easy. In fact, in most cases, it's automatic!

14.2 Automatic Dependencies
When a package is built by RPM, if any file in the package's %files list is a shared library, the library's soname is automatically added to the list of capabilities the package provides. The soname is the name used to determine compatibility between different versions of a library. Note that this is not a filename. In fact, no aspect of RPM's dependency processing is based on filenames. Many people new to RPM often make the assumption that a failed dependency represents a missing file. This is not the case. Remember that RPM's dependency processing is based on knowing what capabilities are provided by a package and what capabilities a package requires. We've seen how RPM automatically determines what shared library resources a package provides. But does it automatically determine what shared libraries a package requires? Yes! RPM does this by running ldd on every executable program in a package's %files list. Since ldd provides a list of the shared libraries each program requires, both halves of the equation are complete -- that is, the packages that make shared libraries available, and the packages that require those shared libraries, are tracked by RPM. RPM can then take that information into account when packages are installed, upgraded, or erased.

14.2.1 The Automatic Dependency Scripts
RPM uses two scripts to handle automatic dependency processing. They reside in /usr/bin and are called find-requires, and find-provides. We'll take a look at them in a minute, but first let's look at why there are scripts to do this sort of thing. Wouldn't it be better to have this built into RPM itself? Actually, creating scripts for this sort of thing is a better idea. The reason? RPM has already been ported to a variety of different operating systems. Determining what


Section 14.2:Automatic Dependencies

283

shared libraries an executable requires, and the soname of shared libraries, is simple, but the exact steps required vary widely from one operating system to another. Putting this part of RPM into a script makes it easier to port RPM. Let's take a look at the scripts that are used by RPM under the Linux operating system. find-requires -- Automatically Determine Shared Library Requirements The find-requires script for Linux is quite simple:
#!/bin/sh # note this works for both a.out and ELF executables ulimit -c 0 filelist=`xargs -r file | fgrep executable | cut -d: -f1 ` for f in $filelist; do ldd $f | awk '/=>/ { print $1 }' done | sort -u | xargs -r -n 1 basename | sort -u

This script first creates a list of executable files. Then, for each file in the list, ldd determines the file's shared library requirements, producing a list of sonames. Finally, the list of sonames is sanitized by removing duplicates, and removing any paths. find-provides -- Automatically Determine Shared Library Sonames The find-provides script for Linux is a bit more complex, but still pretty straightforward:
#!/bin/bash # This script reads filenames from STDIN and outputs any relevant # provides information that needs to be included in the package. filelist=$(grep ".so" | grep -v "^/lib/ld.so" | xargs file -L 2>/dev/null | grep "ELF.*shared object" | cut -d: -f1) for f in $filelist; do soname=$(objdump -p $f | awk '/SONAME/ {print $2}')


284

Chapter 14:Adding Dependency Information to a Package

if [ "$soname" != "" ]; then if [ ! -L $f ]; then echo $soname fi else echo ${f##*/} fi done | sort -u

First, a list of shared libraries is created. Then, for each file on the list, the soname is extracted, cleaned up, and duplicates removed.

14.2.2 Automatic Dependencies: An Example
Let's take a widely used program, ls, the directory lister, as an example. On a Red Hat Linux system, ls is part of the fileutils package and is installed in /bin. Let's play the part of RPM during fileutils' package build and run find-requires on /bin/ls. Here's what we'll see:
# find-requires /bin/ls libc.so.5 #

The find-requires script returned libc.so.5. Therefore, RPM should add a requirement for libc.so.5 when the fileutils package is built. We can verify that RPM did add ls' requirement for libc.so.5 by using RPM's --requires option to display fileutils' requirements:
# rpm -q --requires fileutils libc.so.5 #

OK, that's the first half of the equation -- RPM automatically detecting a package's shared library requirements. Now let's look at the second half of the equation -- RPM detecting packages that provide shared libraries. Since the libc package includes, among others, the shared library /lib/libc.so.5.3.12, RPM would obtain its


Section 14.2:Automatic Dependencies

285

soname. We can simulate this by using find-provides to print out the library's soname:
# find-provides /lib/libc.so.5.3.12 [Ctrl]-[D] libc.so.5 #

OK, so /lib/libc.so.5.3.12's soname is libc.so.5. Let's see if the libc package really does "provide" the libc.so.5 soname:
# rpm -q --provides libc libm.so.5 libc.so.5 #

Yes, there it is, along with the soname of another library contained in the package. In this way, RPM can ensure that any package requiring libc.so.5 will have a compatible library available as long as the libc package, which provides libc.so.5, is installed. In most cases, automatic dependencies are enough to fill the bill. However, there are circumstances when the package builder has to manually add dependency information to a package. Fortunately, RPM's approach to manual dependencies is both simple and flexible.

14.2.3 The autoreqprov Tag -- Disable Automatic Dependency Processing
There may be times when RPM's automatic dependency processing is not desired. In these cases, the autoreqprov tag may be used to disable it. This tag takes a yes/no or 0/1 value. For example, to disable automatic dependency processing, the following line may be used:
AutoReqProv: no


286

Chapter 14:Adding Dependency Information to a Package

14.3 Manual Dependencies
You might have noticed that we've been using the words "requires" and "provides" to describe the dependency relationships between packages. As it turns out, these are the exact words used in spec files to manually add dependency information. Let's look at the first tag: requires.

14.3.1 The requires Tag
We've been deliberately vague when discussing exactly what it quires. Although we've used the word "capabilities", in fact, requirements are always represented in terms of packages. For foo requires that package bar is installed, it's only necessary line to foo's spec file:
requires: bar

is that a package remanual dependency example, if package to add the following

Later, when the foo package is being installed, RPM will consider foo's dependency requirements met if any version of package bar is already installed. 1 If more than one package is required, they can be added to the requires tag, one after another, separated by commas and/or spaces. So if package foo requires packages bar and baz, the following line will do the trick:
requires: bar, baz

As long as any version of bar and baz is installed, foo's dependencies will be met. Adding Version Requirements When a package has slightly more stringent needs, it's possible to require certain versions of a package. All that's necessary is to add the desired version number, preceded by one of the following comparison operators:
1 As long as the requiring and the providing packages are installed using the same invocation of RPM, the dependency checking will succeed. For example, the command rpm -ivh *.rpm will properly check for dependencies, even if the requiring package ends up being installed before the providing package.


Section 14.3:Manual Dependencies

287

· · · · ·

Requires package with a version less than the specified version. Requires package with a version less than or equal to the specified version. Requires package with a version equal to the specified version. Requires package with a version equal to or greater than the specified version. Requires package with a version greater than the specified version.

Continuing with our example, let's suppose that the required version of package bar actually needs to be at least 2.7, and that the baz package must be version 2.1 -- no other version will do. Here's what the requires tag line would look like:
requires: bar >= 2.7, baz = 2.1

We can get even more specific and require a particular release of a package:
requires: bar >= 2.7-4, baz = 2.1-1

When Version Numbers Aren't Enough You might think that with all these features, RPM's dependency processing can handle every conceivable situation. You'd be right, except for the problem of version numbers. RPM needs to be able to determine which version numbers are more recent than others, in order to perform its version comparisons. It's pretty simple to determine that version 1.5 is older than version 1.6. But what about 2.01 and 2.1? Or 7.6a and 7.6? There's no way for RPM to keep up with all the different version-numbering schemes in use. But there is a solution; two, in fact...
Solution Number 1: Serial numbers

When RPM can't decipher a package's version number, it's time to pull out the serial tag. This tag is used to help RPM determine version number ordering. Here's a sample serial tag line:
Serial: 42


288

Chapter 14:Adding Dependency Information to a Package

This line indicates that the package has a serial number of 42. What does the 42 mean? Only that this version of the package is older than the same package with a serial number of 41, but younger than the same package with a serial number of 43. If you think of serial numbers as being nothing more than very simple version numbers, you'll be on the mark. In order to direct RPM to look at the serial number instead of the version number when doing dependency checking, it's necessary to append an "S" to the end of the conditional operator in the requires tag line. So if a package requires package foo to have a serial number equal to 42, the following tag line would be used:
Requires: foo =S 42

If the foo package needs to have a serial number greater than or equal to 42, this line would work:
Requires: foo >=S 42

It might seem that using serial numbers is a lot of extra trouble, and you're right. But there is an alternative:
Solution Number 2: Just Say No!

If you have the option between changing the software's version-numbering scheme, or using serial numbers in RPM, please consider changing the version-numbering scheme. Chances are, if RPM can't figure it out, most of the people using your software can't, either. But in case you aren't the author of the software you're packaging, and its version numbering scheme is giving RPM fits, the serial tag can help you out.

14.3.2 The conflicts Tag
The conflicts tag is the logical complement to the requires tag. It is used to specify which packages conflict with the current package. RPM will not permit conflicting packages to be installed unless overridden with the --nodeps option.


Section 14.3:Manual Dependencies

289

The conflicts tag has the same format as requires. It accepts a real or virtual package name and can optionally include version and release specifications or a serial number.

14.3.3 The provides Tag
Now that you've seen how it's possible to require a package using the requires tag, you're probably expecting that you'll need to use the provides tag in every single package. After all, RPM has to get those package names from somewhere, right? While it is true that RPM needs to have the package names available, the provides tag is normally not required. It would actually be redundant, because the RPM database already contains the name of every package installed. There's no need to duplicate that information. But wait -- We said earlier that manual dependency requirements are always represented in terms of packages. If RPM doesn't require the package builder to use the provides tag to provide the package name, then what is the provides tag used for? Virtual Packages Enter the virtual package. A virtual package is nothing more than a name specified with the provides tag. Virtual packages are handy when a package requires a certain capability, and that capability can be provided by any one of several packages. Here's an example: In order to work properly, sendmail needs a local delivery agent to handle mail delivery. There are a number of different local delivery agents available -- sendmail will work just fine with any of them. In this case, it doesn't make sense to force the use of a particular local delivery agent; as long as one's installed, sendmail's requirements will have been satisfied. So sendmail's package builder adds the following line to sendmail's spec file:
requires: lda


290

Chapter 14:Adding Dependency Information to a Package

There is no package with that name available, so sendmail's requirements must be met with a virtual package. The creators of the various local delivery agents indicate that their packages satisfy the requirements of the lda virtual package by adding the following line to their packages' spec files:
provides: lda

(Note that virtual packages may not have version numbers.) Now, when sendmail is installed, as long as there is a package installed that provides the lda virtual package, there will be no problem.

14.4 To Summarize...
RPM's dependency processing is based on tracking the capabilities a package provides, and the capabilities a package requires. A package's requirements can come from two places: 1. 2. Shared library requirements, automatically determined by RPM. The requires tag line, manually added to the package's spec file.

These requirements can be viewed by using RPM's --requires query option. A specific requirement can be viewed by using the --whatrequires query option. Both options are fully described in Chapter 5, Getting Information About Packages. The capabilities a package provides, can come from three places: 1. 2. 3. Shared library sonames, automatically determined by RPM. The provides tag line, manually added to the package's spec file. The package's name (and optionally, version/serial number).

The first two types of information can be viewed by using RPM's --provides query option. A specific capability can be viewed by using the --whatprovides query option. Both options are fully described in Chapter 5, Getting Information About Packages.


Section 14.4:To Summarize...

291

The package name and version are not considered capabilities that are explicitly provided. Therefore, if a search using --provides or --whatprovides comes up dry, try simply looking for a package by that name. As you've probably gathered by now, using manual dependencies requires some level of synchronization between packages. This can be tricky, particularly if you're not responsible for both packages. But RPM's dependency processing can make life easier for your users.


292

Chapter 14:Adding Dependency Information to a Package


Section 15.1:Why relocatable packages?

293

15

Making a Relocatable Package

RPM has the ability to give users some latitude in deciding where packages are to be installed on their systems. However, package builders must first design their packages to give users this freedom. That's all well and good, but why would the ability to "relocate" a package be all that important?

15.1 Why relocatable packages?
One of the many problems that plague a system administrator's life is disk space. Usually, there's not enough of it, and if there is enough, chances are it's in the wrong place. Here's a hypothetical example: · · Some new software comes out and is desired greatly by the user community. The system administrator carefully reviews the software's installation documentation prior to doing to the installation. 1She notes that the software, all 150MB of it, installs into /opt. Frowning, the sysadmin fires off a quick df command:
# df Filesystem /dev/sda0 /dev/sda6 # 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on 100118 28434 66514 30% / 991995 365527 575218 39% /usr

·

Bottom line: There's no way 150MB of new software is going to fit on the root filesystem. · Sighing heavily, the sysadmin ponders what to do next. If only there were some way to install the software somewhere on the /usr filesystem...

It doesn't have to be this way. RPM has the ability to make packages that can be installed with a user-specified prefix that dictates where the software will actually be
1 Hey, we said it was hypothetical!


294

Chapter 15:Making a Relocatable Package

placed. By making packages relocatable, the package builder can make life easier for sysadmins everywhere. But what exactly is a relocatable package? A relocatable package is a package that is standard in every way, save one. The difference lies in the prefix tag. When this tag is added to a spec file, RPM will attempt to build a relocatable package. Note the word "attempt". There are a few conditions that must be met before a relocatable package can be built successfully, and this chapter will cover them all. But first, let's look at exactly how RPM can relocate a package. And the one component at the heart of package relocation is the prefix tag.

15.2 The prefix tag: Relocation Central
The best way to explain how the prefix tag is used is to step through an example. Here's a sample prefix tag:
Prefix: /opt

In this example, the prefix path is defined as /opt. This means that, by default, the package will install its files under /opt. Let's assume the spec file contains the following line in its %files list:
/opt/bin/baz

If the package is installed without any relocation, this file will be installed in /opt/bin. This is identical to how a non-relocatable package is installed. However, if the package is to be relocated on installation, the path of every file in the %files list is modified according to the following steps: 1. 2. The part of the file's path that corresponds to the path specified on the prefix tag line is removed. The user-specified relocation prefix is prepended to the file's path.

Using our /opt/bin/baz file as an example, let's assume that the user installing the package wishes to override the default prefix (/opt), with a new prefix, say,


Section 15.3:Relocatable Wrinkles: Things to Consider

295

/usr/local/opt. Following the steps above, we first remove the original prefix from the file's path:
/opt/bin/baz

becomes:
/bin/baz

Next, we add the user-specified prefix to the front of the remaining part of the filename:
/usr/local/opt + /bin/baz = /usr/local/opt/bin/baz

Now that the file's new path has been created, RPM installs the file normally. This part of it seems simple enough, and it is. But as we mentioned above, there are a few things the package builder needs to consider before getting on the relocatable package bandwagon.

15.3 Relocatable Wrinkles: Things to Consider
While it's certainly no problem to add a prefix tag line to a spec file, it's necessary to consider a few other issues: · · · Every file in the %files list must start with the path specified on the prefix tag line. The software must be written such that it can operate properly if relocated. Absolute symlinks are a prime example of this. Other software must not rely on the relocatable package being installed in any particular location.

Let's cover each of these issues, starting with the %files list.


296

Chapter 15:Making a Relocatable Package

15.3.1 %files List Restrictions
As mentioned above, each file in the %files list must start with the relocation prefix. If this isn't done, the build will fail:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer + umask 022 + echo Executing: %prep ... Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 Package Prefix = usr/local File doesn't match prefix (usr/local): /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 File not found: /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 Build failed. #

In our example, the build proceeded normally until the time came to create the binary package file. At that point RPM detected the problem. The error message says it all: The prefix line in the spec file (/usr/local) was not present in the first part of the file's (/usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1) path. This stopped the build in its tracks. The fact that every file in a relocatable package must be installed under the directory specified in the prefix line, raises some issues. For example, what about a program that reads a configuration file normally kept in /etc? This question leads right into our next section.

15.3.2 Relocatable Packages Must Contain Relocatable Software
While this section's title seems pretty obvious, it's not always easy to tell if a particular piece of software can be relocated. Let's take a look at the question raised at the end of the previous section. If a program has been written to read its configuration file from /etc, there are three possible approaches to making that program relocatable: 1. Set the prefix to /etc and package everything under /etc.


Section 15.3:Relocatable Wrinkles: Things to Consider

297

2. 3.

Package everything somewhere other than /etc and leave out the config file entirely. Modify the program.

The first approach would certainly work from a purely technical standpoint, but not many people would be happy with a program that installed itself in /etc. So this approach isn't viable. The second approach might be more appropriate, but it forces users to complete the install by having them create the config file themselves. If RPM's goal is to make software easier to install and remove, this is not a viable approach, either! The final approach might be the best. Once the program is installed, when the rewritten software is first run, it could see that no configuration file existed in /etc, and create one. However, even though this would work, when the time came to erase the package, the config file would be left behind. RPM had never installed it, so RPM couldn't get rid of it. There's also the fact that this approach is probably more labor intensive than most package builders would like. None of these approaches are very appealing, are they? Some software just doesn't relocate very well. In general, any of the following things are warning signs that relocation is going to be a problem: · · The software contains one or more files that must be installed in specific directories The software refers to system files using relative paths (Which is really just another way of saying the software must be installed in a particular directory)

If these kinds of issues crop up, then making the software relocatable is going to be tough. And there's still one issue left to consider.


298

Chapter 15:Making a Relocatable Package

15.3.3 The Relocatable Software Is Referenced By Other Software
Even assuming the software is written so that it can be put in a relocatable package, there still might be a problem. And that problem centers not on the relocatable software itself, but on other programs that reference the relocatable software. For example, there are times when a package needs to execute other programs. This might include backup software that needs to send mail, or a communications program that needs to compress files. If these underlying programs were relocatable, and not installed where other packages expect them, then they would be of little use. Granted, this isn't a common problem, but it can happen. And for the package builder interested in building relocatable packages, it's an issue that needs to be explored. Unfortunately, this type of problem can be the hardest to find. If, however, a software product has been found to be relocatable, the mechanics of actually building a relocatable package are pretty straightforward. Let's give it a try.

15.4 Building a Relocatable Package
For this example, we'll use our tried-and-true cdplayer application. Let's start by reviewing the spec file for possible problems:
# # Example spec file for cdplayer app... # Summary:A CD player app that rocks! Name: cdplayer ... %files %doc README /usr/local/bin/cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay %doc /usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 %config /etc/cdp-config


Section 15.4:Building a Relocatable Package

299

Everything looks all right, except for the %files list. There are files in /usr/local/bin, a man page in /usr/local/man/man1, and a config file in /etc. A prefix of /usr/local would work pretty well, except for that cdp-config file. For the sake of this first build, we'll declare the config file unnecessary and remove it from the %files list. We'll then add a prefix tag line, setting the prefix to /usr/local. After these changes are made, let's try a build:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer + umask 022 + echo Executing: %prep Executing: %prep + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 + gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz ... Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 Package Prefix = usr/local File doesn't match prefix (usr/local): /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 File not found: /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 Build failed. #

The build proceeded normally up to the point of actually creating the binary package. The Package Prefix = usr/local line confirms that RPM picked up our prefix tag line. But the build stopped -- and on a file called /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1. But that file isn't even in the %files list. What's going on? Take a closer look at the %files list. See the line that reads %doc README? In The %doc Directive in Section 13.6.1, we discussed how the %doc directive creates a directory under /usr/doc. That's the file that killed the build -- the directory created by the %doc directive. Let's temporarily remove that line from the %files list and try again:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer + umask 022 + echo Executing: %prep Executing: %prep


300

Chapter 15:Making a Relocatable Package

+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 + gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz ... Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 Package Prefix = usr/local Finding dependencies... Requires (2): libc.so.5 libncurses.so.2.0 bin/cdp bin/cdplay man/man1/cdp.1 90 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm + umask 022 + echo Executing: %clean Executing: %clean + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + exit 0 Source Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 cdplayer-1.0.spec cdplayer-1.0.tgz 82 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm #

The build completed normally. Note how the files to be placed in the binary package file are listed, minus the prefix of /usr/local. Some of you might be wondering why the cdp.1 file didn't cause problems. After all, it had a %doc directive, too. The answer lies in the way the file was specified. Since the file was specified using an absolute path, and that path started with the prefix /usr/local, there was no problem. A more complete discussion of the %doc directive can be found in The %doc Directive in Section 13.6.1.

15.4.1 Tying Up the Loose Ends
In the course of building this package, we ran into two hitches: 1. The config file cdp-config couldn't be installed in /etc.


Section 15.4:Building a Relocatable Package

301

2.

The README file could not be packaged using the %doc directive.

Both of these issues are due to the fact that the files' paths do not start with the default prefix path /usr/local. Does this mean this package cannot be relocated? Possibly, but there are two options to consider. The first option is to review the prefix. In the case of our example, if we chose a prefix of /usr instead of /usr/local, the README file could be packaged using the %doc directive, since the default documentation directory is /usr/doc. Another approach would be to use the %docdir directive to define another documentation-holding directory somewhere along the prefix path. 2 This approach wouldn't work for /etc/cdp-config, though. To package that file, we'd need to resort to more extreme measures. Basically, this approach would entail packaging the file in an acceptable directory (something under /usr/local) and using the %post post-install script to move the file to /etc. Pointing a symlink at the config file is another possibility. Of course, this approach has some problems. First, you'll need to write a %postun script to undo what the %post script does. 3A %verifyscript that made sure the files were in place would be nice, too. Second, because the file or symlink wasn't installed by RPM, there's no entry for it in the RPM database. This reduces the utility of RPM's -c and -d options when issuing queries. Finally, if you actually move files around using the %post script, the files you move will not verify properly, and when the package is erased, your users will get some disconcerting messages when RPM can't find the moved files to erase them. If you have to resort to these kinds of tricks, it's probably best to forget trying to make the package relocatable.

15.4.2 Test-Driving a Relocatable Package
Looks like cdplayer is a poor candidate for being made relocatable. However, since we did get a hamstrung version to build successfully, we can use it to show how to test a relocatable package.
2 For more information on the %docdir directive, please see The %docdir Directive in Section 13.6.2. 3 Install and erase-time scripts have an environment variable, RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX, that can be used to write scripts that are able to act appropriately if the package is relocated. See Section 13.3.2, Install/Erase-time Scripts for more information.


302

Chapter 15:Making a Relocatable Package

First, let's see if the binary package file's prefix has been recorded properly. We can do this by using the --queryformat option to RPM's query mode:
# rpm -qp --queryformat '%{DEFAULTPREFIX}\n' cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm /usr/local #

The DEFAULTPREFIX tag directs RPM to display the prefix used during the build. As we can see, it's /usr/local, just as we intended. The --queryformat option is discussed in --queryformat -- Construct a Custom Query Response in Section 5.2.2. So it looks like we have a relocatable package. Let's try a couple of installs and see if we really can install it in different locations. First, let's try a regular install with no prefix specified:
# rpm -Uvh cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm cdplayer ################################################## #

That seemed to work well enough. Let's see if the files went where we intended:
# ls -al /usr/local/bin total 558 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root ... # ls -al /usr/local/man/man1 total 9 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root ... # 40739 Oct 18 Oct 7 13:23 cdp* 7 13:40 cdplay -> /usr/local/bin/cdp*

4550 Oct

7 13:23 cdp.1*

Looks good. Let's erase the package and reinstall it with a different prefix:
# rpm -e cdplayer # rpm -Uvh --prefix /usr/foonly/blather cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm cdplayer ################################################## #


Section 15.4:Building a Relocatable Package

303

(We should mention that directories foonly and blather didn't exist prior to installing cdplayer.) RPM has another tag that can be used with the --queryformat option. It's called INSTALLPREFIX and using it displays the prefix under which a package was installed. Let's give it a try:
# rpm -q --queryformat '%{INSTALLPREFIX}\n' cdplayer /usr/foonly/blather #

As we can see, it displays the prefix we entered on the command line. Let's see if the files were installed as we directed:
# cd /usr/foonly/blather/ # ls -al total 2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root drwxr-xr-x 3 root root #

1024 Oct 1024 Oct

7 13:45 bin/ 7 13:45 man/

So far, so good -- the proper directories are there. Let's look at the man page first:
# cd /usr/foonly/blather/man/man1/ # ls -al total 5 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root #

4550 Oct

7 13:23 cdp.1*

That looks ok. Now on to the files in bin:
# cd /usr/foonly/blather/bin # ls -al total 41 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root #

40739 Oct 18 Oct

7 13:23 cdp* 7 13:45 cdplay -> /usr/local/bin/cdp


304

Chapter 15:Making a Relocatable Package

Uh-oh. That cdplay symlink isn't right. What happened? If we look at cdplayer's makefile, we see the answer:
install: cdp cdp.1.Z ... ln -s /usr/local/bin/cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay

Ah, when the software is installed during RPM's build process, the make file sets up the symbolic link. Looking back at the %files list, we see cdplay listed. RPM blindly packaged the symlink, complete with its non-relocatable string. This is why we mentioned absolute symlinks as a prime example of non-relocatable software. Fortunately, this problem isn't that difficult to fix. All we need to do is change the line in the makefile that creates the symlink from:
ln -s /usr/local/bin/cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay

To:
ln -s ./cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay

Now cdplay will always point to cdp, no matter where it's installed. When building relocatable packages, relative symlinks are your friend! After rebuilding the package, let's see if our modifications have the desired effect. First, a normal install with the default prefix:
# rpm -Uvh cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm cdplayer ################################################## # cd /usr/local/bin/ # ls -al cdplay lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Oct 8 22:32 cdplay -> ./cdp* #

Next, we'll try a second install using the --prefix option (after we first delete the original package):
# rpm -e cdplayer # rpm -Uvh --prefix /a/dumb/prefix cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm


Section 15.4:Building a Relocatable Package

305

cdplayer ################################################## # cd /a/dumb/prefix/bin/ # ls -al cdplay lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Oct 8 22:34 cdplay -> ./cdp* #

As you can see, the trickiest part about building relocatable packages is making sure the software you're packaging is up to the task. Once that part of the job is done, the actual modifications are straightforward. In the next chapter, we'll cover how packages can be built in non-standard directories, as well as how non-root users can build packages.


306

Chapter 15:Making a Relocatable Package


Section 16.1:Using Build Roots in a Package

307

16 Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere
While RPM makes building packages as easy as possible, some of the default design decisions might not work well in a particular situation. Here are two situations where RPM's method of package building may cause problems: 1. 2. You are unable to dedicate a system to RPM package building, or the software you're packaging would disrupt the build system's operation if it were installed. You would like to package software, but you don't have root access to an appropriate build system.

Either of these situations can be resolved by directing RPM to build, install, and package the software in a different area on your build system. It requires a bit of additional effort to accomplish this, but taken a step at a time, it is not difficult. Basically, the process can be summed up by addressing the following steps: · · · Writing the package's spec file to support a build root. Directing RPM to build software in a user-specified build area. Specifying file attributes that RPM needs to set on installation.

The methods discussed here are not required in every situation. For example, a system administrator developing a package on a production system may only need to add support for a build root. On the other hand, a student wishing to build a package on a university system will need to get around the lack of root access by implementing every method described here.

16.1 Using Build Roots in a Package
Part of the process of packaging software with RPM is to actually build the software and install it on the build system. The installation of software can only be accomplished by someone with root access, so a non-privileged user will certainly need to handle RPM's installation phase differently. There are times, however, when even a


308

Chapter 16:Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere

person with root access will not want RPM to copy new files into the system's directories. As mentioned above, the reasons might be due to the fact that the software being packaged is already in use on the build system. Another reason might be as mundane as not having enough free space available to perform the install into the default directories. Whatever the reason, RPM provides the ability to direct a given package to install into an alternate root. This alternate root is known as a build root. Several requirements must be met in order for a build root to be utilized: · · A default build root must be defined in the package's spec file. The installation method used by the software being packaged must be able to support installation in an alternate root.

The first part is easy. It entails adding the following line to the spec file:
BuildRoot:

Of course, you would replace with the name of the directory in which you'd like the software to install. 1If, for example, you specify a build root of /tmp/foo, and the software you're packaging installs a file bar in /usr/bin, you'll find bar residing in /tmp/foo/usr/bin after the build. A note for you non-root package builders: make sure you can actually write to the build root you specify! Those of you with root access should also make sure you choose your build root carefully. For an assortment of reasons, it's not a good idea to declare a build root of "/"! We'll get into the reasons why shortly. The final requirement for adding build root support is to make sure the software's installation method can support installing into an alternate root. The difficulty in meeting this requirement can range from dead simple to nearly impossible. There are probably as many different ways of approaching this as there are packages to build. But in general, some variant of the following approach is used:
1 Keep in mind that the build root can be overridden at build-time using the --buildroot option or the buildroot rpmrc file entry. See Chapter 12, rpm -b Command Reference for more details.


Section 16.1:Using Build Roots in a Package

309

· · ·

The environment variable RPM_BUILD_ROOT is set by RPM and contains the value of the build root to be used when the software is built and installed. The %install section of the spec file is modified to use part of the installation process.
RPM_BUILD_ROOT RPM_BUILD_ROOT

as

If the software is installed using make, the makefile is modified to use and to create any directories that may not exist at installation time.

Here's an example of how these components work together to utilize a build root. First, there's the definition of the build root in the spec file:
BuildRoot: /tmp/cdplayer

This line defines the build root as being /tmp/cdplayer. All the files installed by this software will be placed under the cdplayer directory. Next is the spec file's %install section:
%install make ROOT="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" install

Since the software we're packaging uses make to perform the actual install, we simply define the environment variable ROOT to be the path defined by RPM_BUILD_ROOT. So far, so good. Things really start to get interesting in the software's Makefile, though:
install: cdp cdp.1.Z # chmod 755 cdp # cp cdp /usr/local/bin install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 -d $(ROOT)/usr/local/bin/ install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 cdp $(ROOT)/usr/local/bin/cdp # ln -s /usr/local/bin/cdp /usr/local/bin/cdplay ln -s ./cdp $(ROOT)/usr/local/bin/cdplay # cp cdp.1 /usr/local/man/man1 install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 -d $(ROOT)/usr/local/man/man1/ install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 cdp.1 $(ROOT)/usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1


310

Chapter 16:Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere

In the example above, the commented lines were the original ones. The uncommented lines perform the same function, but also support installation in the root specified by the environment variable ROOT. One point worth noting is that the Makefile now takes extra pains to make sure the proper directory structure exists before installing any files. This is often necessary, as build roots are deleted, in most cases, after the software has been packaged. This is why install is used with the -d option -- to make sure the necessary directories have been created. Let's see how it works:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer Executing: %prep + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD ... + exit 0 Executing: %build + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 ... + exit 0 + umask 022 Executing: %install + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + make ROOT=/tmp/cdplayer install install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 -d /tmp/cdplayer/usr/local/bin/ install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 cdp /tmp/cdplayer/usr/local/bin/cdp ln -s ./cdp /tmp/cdplayer/usr/local/bin/cdplay install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 -d /tmp/cdplayer/usr/local/man/man1/ install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 cdp.1 /tmp/cdplayer/usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 + exit 0 Executing: special doc + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + DOCDIR=/tmp/cdplayer//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + rm -rf /tmp/cdplayer//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + mkdir -p /tmp/cdplayer//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + cp -ar README /tmp/cdplayer//usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 + exit 0 Binary Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 Finding dependencies...


Section 16.1:Using Build Roots in a Package

311

Requires (2): libc.so.5 libncurses.so.2.0 usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README usr/local/bin/cdp usr/local/bin/cdplay usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 93 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm + umask 022 + echo Executing: %clean Executing: %clean + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + exit 0 Source Packaging: cdplayer-1.0-1 cdplayer-1.0.spec cdplayer-1.0.tgz 82 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/cdplayer-1.0-1.src.rpm #

Looking over the output from the %install section, we first see that the RPM_BUILD_ROOT environment variable in the make install command, has been replaced with the path specified earlier in the spec file on the BuildRoot: line. The ROOT environment variable used in the makefile now has the appropriate value, as can be seen in the various install commands that follow. Note, also, that we use install's -d option to ensure that every directory in the path exists before we actually install the software. Unfortunately, we can't do this and install the file in one command. Looking at the section labeled Executing: special doc, we find that RPM is doing something similar for us. It starts by making sure there is no pre-existing documentation directory. Next, RPM creates the documentation directory and copies files into it.


312

Chapter 16:Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere

The remainder of this example is identical to that of a package being built without a build root being specified. However, although the output is identical, there is one crucial difference. When the binary package is created, instead of simply using each line in the %files list verbatim, RPM prepends the build root path first. If this wasn't done, RPM would attempt to find the files, relative to the system's root directory, and would, of course, fail. Because of the automatic prepending of the build root, it's important to not include the build root path in any %files list entry. Otherwise, the files would not be found by RPM, and the build would fail. Although RPM has to go through a bit of extra effort to locate the files to be packaged, the resulting binary package is indistinguishable from the same package created without using a build root.

16.1.1 Some Things to Consider
Once the necessary modifications have been made to support a build root, it's necessary for the package builder to keep some issues in mind. The first is that the build root specified in the spec file can be overridden. RPM will set the build root (and therefore, the value of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) to one of the following values: · · · The value of buildroot in the spec file. The value of buildroot in an rpmrc file. The value following the --buildroot option on the command line.

Because of this, it's important that the spec file and the makefile be written in such a way that no assumptions about the build root are made. The main issue is that the build root must not be hard-coded anywhere. Always use the RPM_BUILD_ROOT environment variable! Another issue to keep in mind is cleaning up after the build. Once software builds and is packaged successfully, it's probably no longer necessary to leave the build root in place. Therefore, it's a good idea to include the necessary commands in the spec file's %clean section. Here's an example:
%clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT


Section 16.2:Having RPM Use a Different Build Area

313

Since RPM executes the %clean section after the binary package has been created, it's the perfect place to delete the build root tree. In the example above, that's exactly what we're doing. We're also doing the right thing by using the RPM_BUILD_ROOT, instead of a hard-coded path. The last issue to keep in mind revolves around the %clean section we just created. At the start of the chapter, we mentioned that it's not a good idea to define a build root of "/". The %clean section is why: If the build root was set to "/", the %clean section would blow away your root filesystem! Keep in mind that this can bite you, even if the package's spec file doesn't specify "/" as a build root. It's possible to use the --buildroot option to specify a dangerous build root, too:
# rpm -ba --buildroot / cdplayer-1.0.spec

But for all the possible hazards using build roots can pose for the careless, it's the only way to prevent a build from disrupting the operation of certain packages on the build system. And for the person wanting to build packages without root access, it's the first of three steps necessary to accomplish the task. The next step is to direct RPM to build the software in a directory other than RPM's default one.

16.2 Having RPM Use a Different Build Area
While RPM's build root requires a certain amount of spec file and make file tweaking in order to get it working properly, directing RPM to perform the build in a different directory is a snap. The hardest part is to create the directories RPM will use during the build process.

16.2.1 Setting up a Build Area
RPM's build area consists of five directories in the top-level: 1. 2. 3. 4. The BUILD directory is where the software is unpacked and built. The RPMS directory is where the newly created binary package files are written. The SOURCES directory contains the original sources, patches, and icon files. The SPECS directory contains the spec files for each package to be built.


314

Chapter 16:Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere

5.

The SRPMS directory is where the newly created source package files are written.

The description of the RPMS directory above, is missing one key point. Since the binary package files are specific to an architecture, the directory actually contains one or more subdirectories, one for each architecture. It is in these subdirectories that RPM will write the binary package files. Let's start by creating the directories. We can even do it with one command:
% pwd /home/ed % mkdir mybuild\ ? mybuild/BUILD\ ? mybuild/RPMS\ ? mybuild/RPMS/i386\ ? mybuild/SOURCES\ ? mybuild/SPECS\ ? mybuild/SRPMS\ %

That's all there is to it. You may have noticed that we created a subdirectory to RPMS called i386 -- This is the architecture-specific subdirectory for Intel x86-based systems, which is our example build system. The next step in getting RPM to use a different build area is telling RPM where the new build area is. And it's almost as easy as creating the build area itself.

16.2.2 Directing RPM to Use the New Build Area
All that's required to get RPM to start using the new build area is to define an alternate value for topdir in an rpmrc file. For the non-root user, this means putting the following line in a file called .rpmrc, located in your home directory:
topdir:

By replacing with the path to the new build area's top-level directory, RPM will attempt to use it the next time a build is performed. Using our newly created build area as an example, we'll set topdir to /home/ed/mybuild:
topdir: /home/ed/mybuild


Section 16.2:Having RPM Use a Different Build Area

315

That's all there is to it. Now it's time to try a build.

16.2.3 Performing a Build in a New Build Area
In the following example, a non-root user attempts to build the cdplayer package in a personal build area. If the user has modified rpmrc file entries to change the default build area, the command used to start the build is just like the one used by a root user. Otherwise, the --buildroot option will need to be used:
% cd /home/ed/mybuild/SPECS % rpm -ba --buildroot /home/ed/mybuildroot cdplayer-1.0.spec * Package: cdplayer + umask 022 Executing: %prep + cd /home/ed/mybuild/BUILD + cd /home/ed/mybuild/BUILD + rm -rf cdplayer-1.0 + gzip -dc /home/ed/mybuild/SOURCES/cdplayer-1.0.tgz + tar -xvvf drwxrwxr-x root/users 0 Aug 20 20:58 1996 cdplayer-1.0/ -rw-r--r-- root/users 17982 Nov 10 01:10 1995 cdplayer-1.0/COPYING ... + cd /home/ed/mybuild/BUILD/cdplayer-1.0 + chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing: %build + cd /home/ed/mybuild/BUILD + cd cdplayer-1.0 + make gcc -Wall -O2 -c -I/usr/include/ncurses cdp.c ... Executing: %install + cd /home/ed/mybuild/BUILD + make ROOT=/home/ed/mybuildroot/cdplayer install install -m 755 -o 0 -g 0 -d /home/ed/mybuildroot/cdplayer/usr/local/bin/ install: /home/ed/mybuildroot/cdplayer: Operation not permitted install: /home/ed/mybuildroot/cdplayer/usr: Operation not permitted install: /home/ed/mybuildroot/cdplayer/usr/local: Operation not permitted install: /home/ed/mybuildroot/cdplayer/usr/local/bin: Operation not permitted install: /home/ed/mybuildroot/cdplayer/usr/local/bin/: Operation not permitted


316

Chapter 16:Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere

make: *** [install] Error 1 Bad exit status %

Things started off pretty well -- The %prep section of the spec file unpacked the sources into the new build area, as did the %build section. The build was proceeding normally in the user-specified build area, and root access was not required. In the %install section, however, things started to fall apart. What happened? Take a look at that install command. The two options, "-o 0" and "-g 0", dictate that the directories to be created in the build root are to be owned by the root account. Since the user performing this build did not have root access, the install failed, and rightly so. OK, let's remove the offending options and see where that gets us. Here's the install section of the make file after our modifications:
install: cdp cdp.1.Z install -m 755 -d $(ROOT)/usr/local/bin/ install -m 755 cdp $(ROOT)/usr/local/bin/cdp rm -f $(ROOT)/usr/local/bin/cdplay ln -s ./cdp $(ROOT)/usr/local/bin/cdplay install -m 755 -d $(ROOT)/usr/local/man/man1/ install -m 755 cdp.1 $(ROOT)/usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1

We'll spare you from having to read through another build, but this time it completed successfully. Now, let's put our sysadmin hat on and install the newly built package:
# rpm -ivh cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm cdplayer ################################################## #

Well, that was easy enough. Let's take a look at some of the files and make sure everything looks OK. We know there are some files installed in /usr/local/bin, so let's check those:
# ls -al /usr/local/bin -rwxr-xr-x 1 ed ed lrwxrwxrwx 1 ed ed 40739 Sep 13 20:16 cdp* 47 Sep 13 20:34 cdplay -> ./cdp*


Section 16.3:Specifying File Attributes

317

#

Looks pretty good... Wait a minute! What's up with the owner and group? The answer is simple: User ed ran the build, which executed the make file, which ran install, which created the files. Since ed created the files, they are owned by him. This brings up an interesting point. Software must be installed with very specific file ownership and permissions. But a non-root user can't create files that are owned by anyone other than his or herself. What is a non-root user to do?

16.3 Specifying File Attributes
In cases where the package builder cannot create the files to be packaged with the proper ownership and permissions, the %attr macro can be used to make things right.

16.3.1 %attr -- How Does It Work?
The %attr macro has the following format:
%attr(, , )

· · · ·

The is represented in traditional numeric fashion. The is specified by the login name of the user. Numeric UIDs are not used, for reasons we'll explore in a moment. The is specified by the group's name, as entered in /etc/group. Numeric GIDs are not used, either. Yes, we'll be discussing that, too! represents the file. Shell-style globbing is supported.

There are a couple other wrinkles to using the %attr macro. If a particular file attribute doesn't need to be specified, that attribute can be replaced with a dash "-" and %attr will not change it. Say, for instance, that a package's files are installed with the permissions correctly set, as they almost always are. Instead of having to go


318

Chapter 16:Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere

to the trouble of entering the permissions for each and every file, each file can have the same %attr:
%attr(-, root, root)

This works for user and group specifications, as well. The other wrinkle is that, although we've been showing the three file attributes separated by commas, in reality they could be separated by spaces as well. Whichever delimiter you choose, it pays to be consistent throughout a spec file. Let's fix up cdplayer with a liberal sprinkling of %attrs. Here's what the %files list looks like after we've had our way with it:
%files %attr(-, root, root) %doc README %attr(4755, root, root) /usr/local/bin/cdp %attr(-, root, root) /usr/local/bin/cdplay %attr(-, root, rot) /usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1

A couple points are worth noting here. The line for README shows that multiple macros can be used on a line -- in this case, one to set file attributes, and one to mark the file as being documentation. The %attr for /usr/local/bin/cdp declares the file to be setuid root. If it sends a shiver down your spine to know that anybody can create a package that will run setuid root when installed on your system -- Good! Just because RPM makes it easy to install software doesn't mean that you should blindly install every package you find. A single RPM command can quickly point out areas of potential problems and should be issued on any package file whose creators you don't trust:
% rpm -qlvp ../RPMS/i386/cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm drwxr-xr-x- root root 1024 Sep 13 20:16 /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1 -rw-r--r--- root root 1085 Nov 10 01:10 /usr/doc/cdplayer-1.0-1/README -rwsr-xr-x- root root 40739 Sep 13 21:32 /usr/local/bin/cdp 47 Sep 13 21:32 /usr/local/bin/cdplay -> ./cdp lrwxrwxrwx- root root -rwxr-xr-x- root rot 4550 Sep 13 21:32 /usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 %


Section 16.3:Specifying File Attributes

319

Sure enough -- there's that setuid root file. In this case we trust the package builder, so let's install it:
# rpm -ivh cdplayer-1.0-1.i386.rpm cdplayer ################################################## group rot does not exist - using root #

What's this about group "rot"? Looking back at the rpm -qlvp output, it looks like /usr/local/man/man1/cdp.1 has a bogus group. Looking back even further, it's there in the %attr for that file. Must have been a typo. We could pretend that RPM used advanced artificial intelligence technology to come to the same conclusion as we did and made the appropriate change, but in reality, RPM simply used the only group identifier it could count on -- root. RPM will do the same thing if it can't resolve a user specification. Let's look at some of the files the package installed, including that worrisome setuid root file:
# ls /usr/local/bin total 558 -rwsr-xr-x 1 root lrwxrwxrwx 1 root # root root 40739 Sep 13 21:32 cdp* 47 Sep 13 21:36 cdplay -> ./cdp*

RPM did just what it was supposed to -- It gave the files the attributes specified by the %attr macros.

16.3.2 Betcha Thought We Forgot...
At the start of this section, we mentioned that the %attr macro wouldn't accept numeric uids or gids, and we promised to explain why. The reason is simply that, even if a package requires a certain user or group to own the package's files, the user may not have the same uid/gid from system to system. There -- wasn't that simple? In the next chapter, we'll discuss how to make your packaged software safe against modification by unscrupulous people. The name of the game is Pretty Good Privacy, and you'll see how signing packages with PGP is easier than you think!


320

Chapter 16:Making a Package That Can Build Anywhere


Section 17.2:Getting Ready to Sign

321

17

Adding PGP Signatures to a Package

In this chapter, we'll explore the steps required to add a digital signature to a package, using the software known as Pretty Good Privacy, or PGP. If you've used PGP before, you probably know everything you'll need to start signing packages in short order. On the other hand, if you feel you need a bit more information on PGP before starting, please refer to Appendix G, An Introduction to PGP for a brief introduction. Once you feel comfortable with PGP, come on back and learn how easy signing packages is...

17.1 Why Sign a Package?
The reason for signing a package is to provide authentication. With a signed package, it's possible for your user community to verify that the package they have was in your possession at some time and has not been changed since then. That "not changed" part is also a good reason to sign your packages, as digital signatures are a very robust way to guard against any modifications to the package. Of course, as with anything else in life, adding a digital signature to a package isn't an ironclad guarantee that everything is right with the package, but it's about as sure a thing as humans can make it.

17.2 Getting Ready to Sign
OK, we've convinced you that signing packages is a good idea. Now we've got to make sure PGP and RPM are up to the task. As you might imagine, there are two parts to this process: one for PGP, and one for RPM. Let's get PGP ready first.

17.2.1 Preparing PGP: Creating a Key Pair
There is really very little to be done to PGP, assuming it's been installed properly. The only thing required is to generate a key pair. As mentioned in our mini-primer on PGP, the key pair consists of a secret key and a public key. In terms of signing packages, you will use your secret key to do the actual signing. Anyone interested in checking your signature will need your public key.


322

Chapter 17:Adding PGP Signatures to a Package

Creating a key pair is quite simple. All that's required is to issue a pgp -kg command, enter some information, and create some random bits. Here's an example key generating session:
# pgp -kg Pretty Good Privacy(tm) 2.6.3a - Public-key encryption for the masses. (c) 1990-96 Philip Zimmermann, Phil's Pretty Good Software. 1996-03-04 Uses the RSAREF(tm) Toolkit, which is copyright RSA Data Security, Inc. Distributed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Export of this software may be restricted by the U.S. government. Current time: 1996/10/31 00:42 GMT Pick your RSA 1) 512 2) 768 3) 1024 key size: bits- Low commercial grade, fast but less secure bits- High commercial grade, medium speed, good security bits- "Military" grade, slow, highest security

Choose 1, 2, or 3, or enter desired number of bits: 3 Generating an RSA key with a 1024-bit modulus. You need a user ID for your public key. The desired form for this user ID is your name, followed by your E-mail address enclosed in , if you have an E-mail address. For example: John Q. Smith <12345.6789@compuserve.com> Enter a user ID for your public key: Example Key for RPM Book You need a pass phrase to protect your RSA secret key. Your pass phrase can be any sentence or phrase and may have many words, spaces, punctuation, or any other printable characters. Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Enter same pass phrase again: (Still not echoed) Note that key generation is a lengthy process. We need to generate 952 random bits. This is done by measuring the time intervals between your keystrokes. Please enter some random text on your keyboard until you hear the beep: (Many random characters were entered) 0 * -Enough, thank you. ............................................ ................................**** ...**** Pass phrase is good. Just a moment....


Section 17.2:Getting Ready to Sign

323

Key signature certificate added. Key generation completed. #

Let's review each of the times PGP required information. The first thing PGP needed to know was the key size we wanted. Depending on your level of paranoia, simply choose an appropriate key size. In our example, we chose the "They're out to get me" key size of 1024 bits. Next, we needed to choose a user ID for the key. The user ID should be descriptive and should also include sufficient information for someone to contact you. We entered Example Key for RPM Book, which goes against our suggestion, but is sufficient for the purposes of our example. After entering a user ID, we needed to add a pass phrase. The pass phrase is used to protect your secret key, so it should be something difficult for someone else to guess. It should also be memorable for you, because if you forget your pass phrase, you won't be able to use your secret key! I entered a couple of words and numbers, put together in such a way that no one could ever guess I typed rpm2kool4words Oops... The pass phrase is entered twice, to ensure that no typing mistakes were made. PGP also performs some cursory checks on the pass phrase, ensuring that the phrase is at least somewhat secure. Finally comes the strangest part of the key-generation process, creating random bits. This is done by measuring the time between keystrokes. The secret here is to not hold down a key so that it auto-repeats and to not wait several seconds between keystrokes. Simply start typing anything (even nonsense text) until PGP tells you you've typed enough. After generating enough random bits, PGP takes a minute or so to create the key pair. Assuming everything completed successfully, you'll see an ending message similar to the one above. You'll also find, in a subdirectory of your login directory called .pgp, the following files:
# ls -al ~/.pgp total 6


324

Chapter 17:Adding PGP Signatures to a Package

drwxr-xr-x drwxr-xr-x -rw-------rw-------rw-------rw------#

2 5 1 1 1 1

root root root root root root

root root root root root root

1024 1024 176 331 408 509

Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct

30 30 30 30 30 30

19:44 19:44 19:44 19:44 19:44 19:44

. .. pubring.bak pubring.pgp randseed.bin secring.pgp

For those interested in learning exactly what each file is, feel free to consult any of the fine books on PGP. For the purposes of signing packages, all we need to know is where these files are located. That's it! Now it's time to configure RPM to use your newly generated key.

17.2.2 Preparing RPM
RPM's configuration process is quite straightforward. It consists of adding a few rpmrc entries in a file of your choice. For more information on rpmrc files in general, please see Appendix B, The rpmrc File. The entries that need to be added to an rpmrc file are: · · · signature pgp_name pgp_path

Let's check out the entries. signature The signature entry is used to select the type of signature that RPM is to use. At the time this book was written, the only legal value is pgp. So you would enter:
signature: pgp


Section 17.3:Signing Packages

325

pgp_name The pgp_name entry gives RPM the user ID of the key it is to sign packages with. In our key generation example, the user ID of the key we created was Example Key for RPM Book, so this is what our entry should look like:
pgp_name: Example Key for RPM Book

pgp_path The pgp_path entry is used to define the path to the directory where the keys are kept. This entry is not needed if the environment variable PGPPATH has been defined. In our example, we didn't move them from PGP's default location, which is in the subdirectory .pgp, off the user's login directory. Since we generated the key as root, our path is /root/.pgp. Therefore, our entry would look like this:
pgp_path: /root/.pgp

And that's it. Now it's time to sign some packages.

17.3 Signing Packages
There are three different ways to sign a package: 1. 2. 3. Signing a package at build-time. Replacing the signature on an already-existing package. Adding a signature to an already-existing package.

Lets take a look at each one, starting with build-time signing.

17.3.1 --sign -- Sign a Package At Build-Time
The --sign option is used to sign a package as it is being built. When this option is added to an RPM build command, RPM will ask for your PGP pass phrase. If the pass phrase is correct, the build will proceed. If not, the build stops immediately.


326

Chapter 17:Adding PGP Signatures to a Package

Here's an example of --sign in action:
# rpm -ba --sign blather-7.9.spec Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Pass phrase is good. * Package: blather ... Binary Packaging: blather-7.9-1 Finding dependencies... ... Generating signature: 1002 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm ... Source Packaging: blather-7.9-1 ... Generating signature: 1002 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/blather-7.9-1.src.rpm #

Once the pass phrase is entered, there's very little that is different from a normal build. The only obvious difference is the Generating signature message in both the binary and source packaging sections. The number following the message indicates that the signature added was created using PGP. 1 Notice, that since RPM only signs the source and binary package files, only the -bb, and -ba options make any sense when used with --sign. This is due to the fact that only the -bb and -ba options create package files. If we issue a quick signature check using RPM's --checksig option, we can see that there is, in fact, a PGP signature present:
# rpm --checksig blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: size pgp md5 OK #

It's clear to see that, in addition to the usual size and MD5 signatures, the package has a PGP signature.
1 The list of possible signature types can be found in the RPM sources, specifically signature.h in RPM's lib subdirectory.


Section 17.3:Signing Packages

327

Multiple Builds? No Problem! You might be wondering how the --sign option would work if more than one package is to be built. Do you have to enter the pass phrase for every single package you build? The answer is no, as long as you build the packages with a single RPM command. Here's an example:
# rpm -ba --sign b*.spec Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Pass phrase is good. * Package: blather ... Binary Packaging: blather-7.9-1 ... Generating signature: 1002 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm ... Source Packaging: blather-7.9-1 ... Generating signature: 1002 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/blather-7.9-1.src.rpm ... * Package: bother ... Binary Packaging: bother-3.5-1 ... Generating signature: 1002 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bother-3.5-1.i386.rpm ... Source Packaging: bother-3.5-1 ... Generating signature: 1002 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/bother-3.5-1.src.rpm #

Using the --sign option makes it as easy to sign one package as it is to sign one hundred. But what happens if you need to change your public key? Will you need to rebuild every single one of your packages just to update the signature?


328

Chapter 17:Adding PGP Signatures to a Package

17.3.2 --resign -- Replace a Package's Signature(s)
As we mentioned at the end of the previous section, from time to time it may be necessary to change your public key. Certainly this would be necessary if your key's security was compromised, but other, more mundane situations might require this. Fortunately, RPM has an option that permits you to replace the signature on an already-built package, with a new one. The option is called --resign, and here's an example of its use:
# rpm --resign blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Pass phrase is good. blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: #

While the output is not as exciting as a package build, the --resign option can be a life-saver if you need to change a package's signature, and you don't want to rebuild. As you might have guessed, the --resign option works properly on multiple package files:
# rpm --resign b*.rpm Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Pass phrase is good. blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: bother-3.5-1.i386.rpm: #

There Are Limits, However... Unfortunately, older package files cannot be re-signed. The package file must be in version 3 format, at least. If you attempt to resign a package that is too old, here's what you'll see:
# rpm --resign blah.rpm Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Pass phrase is good.


Section 17.3:Signing Packages

329

blah.rpm: blah.rpm: Can't re-sign v2.0 RPM #

Not sure what version your package files are at? Just use the file command to check:
# file blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: RPM v3 bin i386 blather-7.9-1 #

The "v3" in file's output indicates the package file format.

17.3.3 --addsign -- Add a Signature To a Package
The --addsign option, as the name suggests, is used to add another signature to the package. It's pretty easy to see why someone would want to have a package that had been signed by the package builders. But what reason would there be for adding a signature to a package? One reason to have more than one signature on a package would be to provide a means of documenting the path of ownership from the package builder to the end-user. As an example, the division of a company creates a package and signs it with the division's key. The company's headquarters then checks the package's signature and adds the corporate signature to the package, in essence stating that the signed package received by them is authentic. Continuing the example, the doubly-signed package makes its way to a retailer. The retailer checks the package's signatures and, when they check out, adds their signature to the package. The package now makes its way to a company that wishes to deploy the package. After checking every signature on the package, they know that it is an authentic copy, unchanged since it was first created. Depending on the deploying company's internal controls, they may choose to add their own signature, thereby reassuring their employees that the package has received their corporate "blessing".


330

Chapter 17:Adding PGP Signatures to a Package

After this lengthy example, the actual output from the --addsign option is a bit anti-climactic:
# rpm --addsign blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Pass phrase is good. blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: #

If we check the signatures of this package, we'll be able to see the multiple signatures:
# rpm --checksig blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: size pgp pgp md5 OK #

The two pgp's in --checksig's output clearly shows that the package has been signed twice. A Few Caveats As with the --resign option, the --addsign option cannot do its magic on pre-V3 package files:
# rpm --addsign blah.rpm Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Pass phrase is good. blah.rpm: blah.rpm: Can't re-sign v2.0 RPM #

OK, the error message may not be 100% accurate, but you get the idea. Another thing to be aware of is that the --addsign option does not check for multiple identical signatures. Although it doesn't make much sense to do so, RPM will happily let you add the same signature as many times as you'd like:
# rpm --addsig blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed)


Section 17.3:Signing Packages

331

Pass phrase is good. blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: # rpm --addsig blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Pass phrase is good. blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: # rpm --addsig blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm Enter pass phrase: (Not echoed) Pass phrase is good. blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: # rpm --checksig blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm blather-7.9-1.i386.rpm: size pgp pgp pgp pgp md5 OK #

As we can see from --checksig's output, the package now has four identical signatures. Maybe this is the digital equivalent of pressing down extra hard while writing your name...


332

Chapter 17:Adding PGP Signatures to a Package


Section 18.2:Why Are They Needed?

333

18

Creating Subpackages

In this chapter, we will explore one of RPM's more interesting capabilities: the capability to create subpackages.

18.1 What Are Subpackages?
Very simply put, a subpackage is one of several package files created from a single spec file. RPM has the ability to create a main package, along with one or more subpackages. Subpackages may also be created without the main package. It's all up to the package builder.

18.2 Why Are They Needed?
If all the software in the world followed the usual "one source, one binary" structure, there would be no need for subpackages. After all, RPM handles the building and packaging of a program into a single package file just fine. But software doesn't always conform to this simplistic structure. It's not unusual for software to support two or more different modes of operation. A client/server program, for example, comes in two flavors: a client, and a server. And it can get more complicated than that. Sometimes software relies on another program so completely that the two cannot be built separately. The result is often several packages. While it is force these to let RPM viewpoint, effort. certainly possible that kinds of software into manage the creation of the main reason to use some convoluted procedure could be devised to a single-package structure, it makes more sense subpackages. Why? From the package builder's subpackages is to eliminate any duplication of

By using subpackages, there's no need to maintain separate spec files and endure the resulting headaches when new versions of the software become available. By keeping everything in one spec file, new software versions can be quickly integrated, and every related subpackage rebuilt with a single command.


334

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

But that's enough of the preliminaries. Let's see how subpackages are created.

18.3 Our Example Spec File: Subpackages Galore!
Throughout this chapter, we'll be constructing a spec file that will consist of a number of subpackages. Let's start by listing the spec file's requirements: · · · The main package name is to be foo. The version is to be 2.7. There are three subpackages: · · · · · The server subpackage, to be called foo-server. The client subpackage, to be called foo-client. The baz development library subpackage, to be called bazlib.

The bazlib subpackage has a version of 5.6. Each subpackage will have its own summary and description tags.

Every spec file starts with a preamble, and this one is no different. In this case, the preamble will contain the following tags:
Name: foo Version: 2.7 Release: 1 Source: foo-2.7.tgz CopyRight: probably not Summary: The foo app, and the baz library needed to build it Group: bogus/junque %description This is the long description of the foo app, and the baz library needed to build it...

As we can see, there's nothing different here: this is an ordinary spec file so far. Let's delve into things a bit more and see what we'll need to add to this spec file to create the subpackages we require.


Section 18.4:Spec File Changes For Subpackages

335

18.4 Spec File Changes For Subpackages
The creation of subpackages is based strictly on the contents of the spec file. This doesn't mean that you'll have to learn an entirely new set of tags, conditionals, and directives in order to create subpackages. In fact, you'll only need to learn one. The primary change to a spec file is structural and starts with the definition of a preamble for each subpackage.

18.4.1 The Subpackage's "Preamble"
When we introduced RPM package building in Chapter 10, The Basics of Developing With RPM, we said that every spec file contains a preamble. The preamble contains a variety of tags that define all sorts of information about the package. In a single package situation, the preamble must be at the start of the spec file. The spec file we're creating will have one there, too. When creating a spec file that will build subpackages, each subpackage also needs a preamble of its own. These "sub-preambles" need only define information for the subpackage when that information differs from what is defined in the main preamble. For example, if we wanted to define an installation prefix for a subpackage, we would add the appropriate prefix tag to that subpackage's preamble. That subpackage would then be relocatable. In a single-package spec file, there is nothing that explicitly identifies the preamble, other than its position at the top of the file. For subpackages, however, we need to be a bit more explicit. So we use the %package directive to identify the preamble for each subpackage. The %package Directive The %package directive actually performs two functions. As we mentioned above, it is used to denote the start of a subpackage's preamble. It also plays a role in forming the subpackage's name. As an example, let's say the main preamble contains the following name tag:
name: foo


336

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

Later in the spec file, there is a %package directive:
%package bar

This would result in the name of the subpackage being foo-bar. In this way, it's easy to see the relationship of the subpackage to the main package (or other subpackages, for that matter). Of course, this naming convention might not be appropriate in every case. So there is an option to the %package directive for just this circumstance. Adding -n To the %package directive The -n option is used to change the final name of a subpackage from - to . Let's modify the %package directive in our example above to be:
%package -n bar

The result is that the subpackage name would then be bar instead of foo-bar. Updating Our Spec File Let's apply some of our newly found knowledge to the spec file we're writing. Here's the list of subpackages that we need to create: · · · The server subpackage, to be called foo-server. The client subpackage, to be called foo-client. The baz development library subpackage, to be called bazlib.

Since our package name is foo, and since the %package directive creates subpackage names by prepending the package name, the %package directives for the foo-server and foo-client subpackages would be written as:
%package server %package client


Section 18.4:Spec File Changes For Subpackages

337

Since the baz library's package name is not to start with foo, we need to use the -n option on its %package directive:
%package -n bazlib

Our requirements further state that foo-server and foo-client are to have the same version as the main package. One of the time-saving aspects of using subpackages is that there is no need to duplicate information for each subpackage if it is already defined in the main package. Therefore, since the main package's preamble has a version tag defining the version as 2.7, the two subpackages that lack a version tag in their preambles will simply inherit the main package's version definition. Since the bazlib subpackage's preamble contains a version tag, it must have its own unique version. In addition, each subpackage must have its own summary tag. So based on these requirements, our spec file now looks like this:
Name: foo Version: 2.7 Release: 1 Source: foo-2.7.tgz CopyRight: probably not Summary: The foo app, and the baz library needed to build it Group: bogus/junque %description This is the long description of the foo app, and the baz library needed to build it... %package server Summary: The foo server %package client Summary: The foo client %package -n bazlib Version: 5.6 Summary: The baz library


338

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

We can see the subpackage structure starting to appear now. Required Tags In Subpackages There are a few more tags we should add to the subpackages in our example spec file. In fact, if these tags are not present, RPM will issue a most impressive warning:
# rpm -ba foo-2.7.spec * Package: foo * Package: foo-server Field must be present Field must be present * Package: foo-client Field must be present Field must be present * Package: bazlib Field must be present Field must be present

: Description : Group : Description : Group : Description : Group

Spec file check failed!! Tell rpm-list@redhat.com if this is incorrect. #

Our spec file is incomplete. The bottom line is that each subpackage must have these three tags: 1. 2. 3. The %description tag. The group tag. The summary tag.

It's easy to see that the first two tags are required, but what about summary? Well, we lucked out on that one: we already included a summary for each subpackage in our example spec file. Let's take a look at the %description tag first. The %description Tag As you've probably noticed, the %description tag differs from other tags. First of all, it starts with a percent sign. Secondly, its data can span multiple lines. The third difference is that the %description tag must include the name of the subpackage


Section 18.4:Spec File Changes For Subpackages

339

it describes. This is done by appending the subpackage name to the %description tag itself. So given these %package directives:
%package server %package client %package -n bazlib

our %description tags would start with:
%description server %description client %description -n bazlib

Notice that we've included the -n option in the %description tag for bazlib. This was intentional, as it makes the name completely unambiguous. Our Spec File So Far... OK, let's take a look at the spec file after we've added the appropriate %descriptions, along with group tags for each subpackage:
Name: foo Version: 2.7 Release: 1 Source: foo-2.7.tgz CopyRight: probably not Summary: The foo app, and the baz library needed to build it Group: bogus/junque %description This is the long description of the foo app, and the baz library needed to build it... %package server Summary: The foo server Group: bogus/junque %description server This is the long description for the foo server... %package client Summary: The foo client Group: bogus/junque %description client This is the long description for the foo client...


340

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

%package -n bazlib Version: 5.6 Summary: The baz library Group: bogus/junque %description -n bazlib This is the long description for the bazlib...

Let's take a look at what we've done. We've created a main preamble as we normally would. We then created three additional preambles, each starting with a %package directive. Finally, we added a few tags to the subpackage preambles. But what about version tags? Aren't the server and client subpackages missing them? Not really. Remember that if a subpackage is missing a given tag, it will inherit the value of that tag from the main preamble. We're well on our way to having a complete spec file, but we aren't quite there yet. Let's continue by looking at the next part of the spec file that changes when building subpackages.

18.4.2 The %files List
In an ordinary single-package spec file, the %files list is used to determine which files are actually going to be packaged. It is no different when building subpackages. What is different, is that there must be a %files list for each subpackage. Since each %files list must be associated with a particular %package directive, we simply label each %files list with the name of the subpackage, as specified by each %package directive. Going back to our example, our %package lines were:
%package server %package client %package -n bazlib

Therefore, our %files lists should start with:
%files server %files client


Section 18.4:Spec File Changes For Subpackages

341

%files -n bazlib

In addition, we need the main package's %files list, which remains unnamed:
%files

The contents of each %files list is dictated entirely by the software's requirements. If, for example, a certain file needs to be packaged in more than one package, it's perfectly all right to include the filename in more than one list. Controlling Packages With the %files List The %files list wields considerable power over subpackages. It's even possible to prevent a package from being created by using the %files list. But is there a reason why you'd want to go to the trouble of setting up subpackages, only to keep one from being created? Actually, there is. Take, for example, the case where client/server-based software is to be packaged. Certainly, it makes sense to create two subpackages: one for the client and one for the server. But what about the main package? Is there any need for it? Quite often there's no need for a main package. In those cases, removing the main %files list entirely will result in no main package being built. A Point Worth Noting Please keep in mind that an empty %files list (ie, a %files list that contains no files) is not the same as not having a %files list at all. As we noted above, entirely removing a %files list results in RPM not creating that package. However, if RPM comes across a %files list with no files, it will happily create an empty package file. This feature (which also works with subpackage %files lists) comes in handy when used in concert with conditionals. If a %files list is enclosed by a conditional, the package will be created (or not) based on the evaluation of the conditional.


342

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

Our Spec File So Far... Ok, let's update our example spec file. Here's what it looks like after adding each of the subpackages' %files lists:
Name: foo Version: 2.7 Release: 1 Source: foo-2.7.tgz CopyRight: probably not Summary: The foo app, and the baz library needed to build it Group: bogus/junque %description This is the long description of the foo app, and the baz library needed to build it... %package server Summary: The foo server Group: bogus/junque %package client Summary: The foo client Group: bogus/junque %package -n bazlib Version: 5.6 Summary: The baz library Group: bogus/junque

%files /usr/local/foo-file %files server /usr/local/server-file %files client /usr/local/client-file %files -n bazlib /usr/local/bazlib-file

As you can see we've added %files lists for:


Section 18.4:Spec File Changes For Subpackages

343

· · · ·

The main foo package. The foo-server subpackage. The foo-client subpackage. The bazlib subpackage.

Each package contains a single file. 1If there was no need for a main package, we could simply remove the unnamed %files list. Keep in mind that even if you do not create a main package, the tags defined in the main package's preamble will appear somewhere -- specifically, in the source package file. Let's look at the last subpackage-specific part of the spec file: the install- and erasetime scripts.

18.4.3 Install- and Erase-time Scripts
The install- and erase-time scripts, %pre, %preun, %post, and %postun, can all be named using exactly the same method as was used for the other subpackage-specific sections of the spec file. The script used during package verification, %verifyscript, can be made package-specific as well. Using the subpackage structure from our example spec file, we would end up with script definitions like: · · · · %pre server %postun client %preun -n bazlib %verifyscript client

Other than the change in naming, there's only one thing to be aware of when creating scripts for subpackages. It's important that you consider the possibility of scripts from various subpackages interacting with each other. Of course, this is simply good script-writing practice, even if the packages involved are not related.
1 Hey, we said it was a simple example!


344

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

Back At the Spec File... Here we've added some scripts to our spec file. So that our example doesn't get too complex, we've just added preinstall scripts for each package:
Name: foo Version: 2.7 Release: 1 Source: foo-2.7.tgz CopyRight: probably not Summary: The foo app, and the baz library needed to build it Group: bogus/junque %description This is the long description of the foo app, and the baz library needed to build it... %package server Summary: The foo server Group: bogus/junque %description server This is the long description for the foo server... %package client Summary: The foo client Group: bogus/junque %description client This is the long description for the foo client... %package -n bazlib Version: 5.6 Summary: The baz library Group: bogus/junque %description -n bazlib This is the long description for the bazlib...

%pre echo "This is the foo package preinstall script" %pre server echo "This is the foo-server subpackage preinstall script" %pre client echo "This is the foo-client subpackage preinstall script"


Section 18.5:Build-Time Scripts: Unchanged For Subpackages

345

%pre -n bazlib echo "This is the bazlib subpackage preinstall script" %files /usr/local/foo-file %files server /usr/local/server-file %files client /usr/local/client-file %files -n bazlib /usr/local/bazlib-file

As pre-install scripts go, these don't do very much. But they will allow us to see how subpackage-specific scripts can be defined. Those of you that have built packages before probably realize that our spec file is missing something. Let's add that part now.

18.5 Build-Time Scripts: Unchanged For Subpackages
While creating subpackages changes the general structure of the spec file, there's one section that doesn't change: the build-time scripts. This means there is only one set of %prep, %build, and %install scripts in any spec file. Of course, even if RPM doesn't require any changes to these scripts, you still might need to make some subpackage-related changes to them. Normally these changes are related to doing whatever is required to get the all the software unpacked, built, and installed. For example, if packaging client/server software, the software for both the client and the server must be unpacked, and then both the client and server binaries must be built and installed.

18.5.1 Our Spec File: One Last Look...
Let's add some build-time scripts and take a final look at the spec file:
Name: foo


346

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

Version: 2.7 Release: 1 Source: foo-2.7.tgz CopyRight: probably not Summary: The foo app, and the baz library needed to build it Group: bogus/junque %description This is the long description of the foo app, and the baz library needed to build it... %package server Summary: The foo server Group: bogus/junque %description server This is the long description for the foo server... %package client Summary: The foo client Group: bogus/junque %description client This is the long description for the foo client... %package -n bazlib Version: 5.6 Summary: The baz library Group: bogus/junque %description -n bazlib This is the long description for the bazlib... %prep %setup %build make %install make install %pre echo "This is the foo package preinstall script" %pre server echo "This is the foo-server subpackage preinstall script" #%pre client


Section 18.6:Building Subpackages

347

#echo "This is the foo-client subpackage preinstall script" %pre -n bazlib echo "This is the bazlib subpackage preinstall script" %files /usr/local/foo-file %files server /usr/local/server-file %files client /usr/local/client-file %files -n bazlib /usr/local/bazlib-file

As you can see, the build-time scripts are about as simple as they can be.

2

18.6 Building Subpackages
Now it's time to give our example spec file a try. The build process is not that much different from a single-package spec file:
# rpm -ba foo-2.7.spec * Package: foo * Package: foo-server * Package: foo-client * Package: bazlib ... Executing: %prep ... Executing: %build ... Executing: %install ... Executing: special doc + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd foo-2.7 + DOCDIR=//usr/doc/foo-2.7-1 2 This is the advantage to making up an example. A more real-world spec file would undoubtedly have more interesting scripts.


348

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

+ DOCDIR=//usr/doc/foo-server-2.7-1 + DOCDIR=//usr/doc/foo-client-2.7-1 + DOCDIR=//usr/doc/bazlib-5.6-1 + exit 0 Binary Packaging: foo-2.7-1 Finding dependencies... usr/local/foo-file 1 block Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/foo-2.7-1.i386.rpm Binary Packaging: foo-server-2.7-1 Finding dependencies... usr/local/server-file 1 block Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/foo-server-2.7-1.i386.rpm Binary Packaging: foo-client-2.7-1 Finding dependencies... usr/local/client-file 1 block Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/foo-client-2.7-1.i386.rpm Binary Packaging: bazlib-5.6-1 Finding dependencies... usr/local/bazlib-file 1 block Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bazlib-5.6-1.i386.rpm ... Source Packaging: foo-2.7-1 foo-2.7.spec foo-2.7.tgz 4 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/foo-2.7-1.src.rpm #

Starting at the top, we start the build with the usual command. Immediately following the command, RPM indicates that four packages are to be built from this spec file. The %prep, %build, and %install scripts then execute as usual. Next, RPM executes its "special doc" internal script, even though we haven't declared any files to be documentation. It's worth noting, however, that the DOCDIR


Section 18.6:Building Subpackages

349

environment variables show that if the spec file had declared some of the files as documentation, RPM would have created the appropriate documentation directories for each of the packages. At this point, RPM creates the binary packages. As we can see, each package contains the file defined in its %files list. Finally, the source package file is created. It contains the spec file and the original sources, just like any other source package. One spec file. One set of sources. One build command. Four packages. 3All in all, a pretty good deal, isn't it?

18.6.1 Giving Subpackages the Once-Over
Let's take a look at our newly created packages. As with any other package, each subpackage should be tested by installing it on a system that has not had that software installed before. In this section, we'll just snoop around the subpackages and point out how they differ from packages built one to a spec file. First, let's just look at each package's information:
# rpm -qip foo-2.7-1.i386.rpm Name : foo Distribution: (none) Version : 2.7 Vendor: (none) Release :1 Build Date: Wed Nov 06 13:33:37 1996 Install date: (none) Build Host: foonly.rpm.org Group : bogus/junque Source RPM: foo-2.7-1.src.rpm Size : 35 Summary : The foo app, and the baz library needed to build it Description : This is the long description of the foo app, and the baz library needed to build it... # # rpm -qip foo-server-2.7-1.i386.rpm Name : foo-server Distribution: (none) Version : 2.7 Vendor: (none) Release :1 Build Date: Wed Nov 06 13:33:37 1996 Install date: (none) Build Host: foonly.rpm.org Group : bogus/junque Source RPM: foo-2.7-1.src.rpm Size : 42 3 Five, if you count the source package.


350

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

Summary : The foo server Description : This is the long description for the # # rpm -qip foo-client-2.7-1.i386.rpm Name : foo-client Version : 2.7 Release :1 Install date: (none) Group : bogus/junque Size : 42 Summary : The foo client Description : This is the long description for the # # rpm -qip bazlib-5.6-1.i386.rpm Name : bazlib Version : 5.6 Release :1 Install date: (none) Group : bogus/junque Size : 38 Summary : The baz library Description : This is the long description for the #

foo server...

Distribution: Vendor: Build Date: Build Host: Source RPM:

(none) (none) Wed Nov 06 13:33:37 1996 foonly.rpm.org foo-2.7-1.src.rpm

foo client...

Distribution: Vendor: Build Date: Build Host: Source RPM:

(none) (none) Wed Nov 06 13:33:37 1996 foonly.rpm.org foo-2.7-1.src.rpm

bazlib...

Here we've used RPM's query capability to display a list of summary information for each package. A few points are worth noting. First, each package lists foo-2.7-1.src.rpm as its source package file. This is the only way to tell if two package files were created from the same set of sources. Trying to use a package's name as an indicator is futile, as the bazlib package shows us. The next thing to notice is that the summaries and descriptions for each package are specific to that package. Since these tags were placed and named according to each package, that should be no surprise.


Section 18.6:Building Subpackages

351

Finally, we can see that each package's version has been either "inherited" from the main package's preamble, or, as in the case of the bazlib package, the main package's version has been overridden by a version tag added to bazlib's preamble. If we look at the source package's information, we see that its information has been taken entirely from the main package's set of tags:
# rpm -qip foo-2.7-1.src.rpm Name : foo Distribution: (none) Version : 2.7 Vendor: (none) Release :1 Build Date: Wed Nov 06 13:33:37 1996 Install date: (none) Build Host: foonly.rpm.org Group : bogus/junque Source RPM: (none) Size : 1415 Summary : The foo app, and the baz library needed to build it Description : This is the long description of the foo app, and the baz library needed to build it... #

It's easy to see that if there was no %files list for the main package, and therefore, no main package, the tags in the main preamble would still be used in the source package. This is why RPM enforces the requirement that the main preamble contain copyright, %description, and group tags. So, here's a word to the wise: Don't put something stupid in the main preamble's %description just to satisfy RPM. Your witty saying will be immortalized for all time in every source package you distribute. 4 Verifying Subpackage-specific Install and Erase Scripts The easiest way to verify that the %pre scripts we defined for each package were actually used is to simply install each package:
# rpm -Uvh foo-2.7-1.i386.rpm foo This is the foo package preinstall script ################################################## # # rpm -Uvh foo-server-2.7-1.i386.rpm foo-server This is the foo-server subpackage preinstall script 4 Yes, the author found out about this hard way!


352

Chapter 18:Creating Subpackages

################################################## # # rpm -Uvh foo-client-2.7-1.i386.rpm foo-client This is the foo-client subpackage preinstall script ################################################## # # rpm -Uvh bazlib-5.6-1.i386.rpm bazlib This is the bazlib subpackage preinstall script ################################################## #

As expected, the unique %pre script for each package has been included. Of course, if we hadn't wanted to actually install the packages, we could have used RPM's --scripts option to display the scripts:
# rpm -qp --scripts foo-2.7-1.i386.rpm preinstall script: echo "This is the foo package preinstall script" postinstall script: (none) preuninstall script: (none) postuninstall script: (none) verify script: (none) #

This approach might be a bit safer, particularly if installing the newly built package would disrupt operations on your build system.


Section 19.1:Architectures and Operating Systems: A Primer

353

19 Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems
While RPM certainly makes packaging software as easy as possible, it doesn't end there. RPM gives you the tools you need to build a package on different types of computers. More importantly, RPM makes it possible to build packages on different types of computers using a single spec file. Those of you that have developed software for different computers know the importance of maintaining a single set of sources. RPM lets you continue that practice through the package building phase. Before we get into RPM's capabilities, let's do a quick review of what is involved in developing software for different types of computer systems.

19.1 Architectures and Operating Systems: A Primer
From a software engineering standpoint, there are only two major differences between any two computer systems: 1. 2. The architecture implemented by the computer's hardware. The system software running on the computer.

The first difference is built into the computer. The architecture is the manner in which the computer system was designed. It includes the number and type of registers present in the processor, the number of machine instructions, what operations they perform, and so on. For example, every "PC" today, no matter who built it, is based on the Intel x86 architecture. The second difference is more under our control. The operating system is software that controls how the system operates. Different operating systems have different methods of storing information on disk, different ways of implementing functions used by programs, and different hardware requirements. As far as package building is concerned, two systems with the same architecture running two different operating systems, are as different as two systems with different architectures running the same operating system. In the first case, the software being


354 Chapter 19: Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems

packaged for different operating systems will differ due to the differences between the operating systems. In the second case, the software being packaged for different architectures will differ due to the underlying differences in hardware. 1 RPM supports differences in architecture and operating system equally. If there is a tag, rpmrc file entry, or conditional that is used to support architectural differences, there is a corresponding tag, entry, or conditional that supports operating system differences.

19.1.1 Let's Just Call Them Platforms
In order to keep the duplication in this chapter to a minimum, we'll refer to a computer of a given architecture running a given operating system as a platform. If another system differs in either aspect, it is considered a different platform. OK, now that we've gotten through the preliminaries, let's look at RPM's multiplatform capabilities.

19.2 What Does RPM Do To Make Multi-Platform Packaging Easier?
As we mentioned above, RPM supports multi-platform package building through a set of tags, rpmrc file entries, and conditionals. None of these tools are difficult to use. In fact, the hardest part of multi-platform package building is figuring out how the software needs to be changed to support different platforms. Let's take a look at each multi-platform tool RPM provides.

19.2.1 Automatic Detection of Build Platform
The first thing necessary for easy multi-platform package building is to identify which platform the package is to be built for. Except in the fairly esoteric case of crosscompilation, the build platform is the platform on which the package is built. RPM does this for you automatically, although it can be overridden at build-time.
1 This is a somewhat simplistic view of the matter, as it's common for incompatibilities to crop up between two different implementations of the same operating system on different architectures.


Section 19.3:Build and Install Platform Detection

355

19.2.2 Automatic Detection of Install Platform
The other important platform in package building is the platform on which the package is to be installed. Here again, RPM does this for you, though it's possible to override this when the package is installed. But there is more to multi-platform package building than simply being able to determine the platform during package building and installation. The next component in multi-platform package building is a set of platform-dependent tags.

19.2.3 Platform-Dependent Tags
RPM uses a number of tags that control which platforms can build a package. These tags make it easier for the package builder to build multiple packages automatically, since the tags will keep RPM from attempting to build packages that are incompatible with the build platform.

19.2.4 Platform-Dependent Conditionals
While the platform-dependent tags provide a crude level of multi-platform control (i.e., the package will be built or not, depending on the tags and the build platform), RPM's platform-dependent conditionals provide a much finer level of control. By using these conditionals, it's possible to excise those parts of the spec file that are specific to another platform and replace them with one or more lines that are compatible with the build platform. Now that we have a basic idea of RPM's multi-platform support features, let's take a more in-depth look at each one.

19.3 Build and Install Platform Detection
As we mentioned above, the first step to multi-platform package building is to identify the build platform. This is done by matching information from the build system's uname output against a number of rpmrc file entries. Normally, it's not necessary to worry too much about the following rpmrc file entries, as RPM comes with a set of entries that support all platforms that currently run


356 Chapter 19: Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems

RPM. However, when adding support for new platforms, it will be necessary to use the following entries to add support for the new build platform.

19.3.1 Platform-Specific rpmrc Entries
Normally, the file /usr/lib/rpmrc contains the following rpmrc file entries. They can be overridden by entries in /etc/rpmrc or ~/.rpmrc. This is discussed more completely in Appendix B, The rpmrc File. Because each entry type is available in both architecture and operating system flavors, we'll just use xxx in place of arch and os in the following descriptions. xxx_canon -- Define Canonical Platform Name and Number The xxx_canon entry is used to convert information obtained from the system running RPM into a canonical name and number that RPM will use internally. Here's the format:
xxx_canon: :

The is compared against information from uname(2). If a match is found, then is used by RPM as the canonical name, and is used as a unique numeric value. Here are two examples:
arch_canon: sun4: os_canon: Linux: sparc Linux 3 1

The arch_canon tag above is used to define the canonical architecture information for Sun Microsystems' SPARC architecture. In this case, the output from uname is compared against sun4. If there's a match, the canonical architecture name is set to sparc and the architecture number is set to 3. The os_canon tag above is used to define the canonical operating system information for the Linux operating system. In this case, the output from uname is compared against Linux. If there's a match, the canonical operating system name is set to Linux, and the operating system number is set to 1. The description above is not 100% complete -- There is an additional step performed during the time RPM gets the system information from uname, and compares it


Section 19.3:Build and Install Platform Detection

357

against a canonical name. Next, let's look at the rpmrc file entry that comes into play during this intermediate step. buildxxxtranslate -- Define Build Platform The buildxxxtranslate entry is used to define the build platform information. Specifically, these entries are used to create a table that maps information from uname to the appropriate architecture/operating system name. The buildxxxtranslate entry looks like this:
buildxxxtranslate: :

The is compared against information from uname(2). If a match is found, then is used by RPM as the build platform information, after it has been canonicalized by xxx_canon. Here are two examples:
buildarchtranslate: i586: i386 buildostranslate: Linux: Linux

The buildarchtranslate tag shown above is used to define the build architecture for an Intel Pentium (or i586 as it's shown here) processor. Any Pentium-based system will, by default, build packages for the Intel 80386 (or i386) architecture. The buildostranslate tag shown above is used to define the build operating system for systems running the Linux operating system. In this case, the build operating system remains unchanged. xxx_compat -- Define Compatible Architectures The xxx_compat entry is used to define which architectures and operating systems are compatible with one another. It is used at install-time only. The format of the entry is:
xxx_compat: :


358 Chapter 19: Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems

The is a name string as defined by an xxx_canon entry. The following it consists of one or more names, also defined by arch_canon. If there is more than one name in the list, they should be separated by a space. The names in the list are considered compatible to the name specified in the label.
arch_compat: i586: i486 arch_compat: i486: i386 os_compat: Linux: AIX

The arch_compat lines shown above illustrate how a family of upwardly compatible architectures may be represented. For example, if the build architecture was defined as an i586, the compatible architectures would be i486, and i386. However, if the build system was an i486, the only compatible architecture would be an i386. While the os_compat line shown above is entirely fictional, its purpose would be to declare AIX compatible with Linux. If it were only that simple...

19.3.2 Overriding Platform Information At Build-Time
By using the rpmrc file entries discussed above, RPM usually makes the right decisions in selecting the build and install platforms. However, there might be times when RPM's selections aren't the best. Normally the circumstances are unusual, as in the case of cross-compiling software. In these cases, it is nice to have an easy way of overriding the build-time architecture and operating system. The --buildarch and --buildos options can be used to set the build-time architecture and operating system rather than relying on RPM's automatic detection capabilities. These options are added to a normal RPM build command. One important point to remember is that, although RPM does try to find the specified architecture name, it does no checking as to the sanity of the entered architecture or operating system. For example, if you enter an entirely fictional operating system, RPM will issue a warning message, and then happily build a package for it. Why? Wouldn't it make more sense for RPM to perform some sort of sanity check? In a word, no. One of RPM's main design goals was to never get in the way of the package builder. If someone has a need to override their build platform information,


Section 19.4: optflags -- The Other rpmrc File Entry

359

they should know what they're doing, and what the full implications of their actions are. Bottom line: Unless you know why you need to use --buildarch or --buildos, you probably don't need to use them.

19.3.3 Overriding Platform Information At Install-Time
It's also possible to direct RPM to ignore platform information while a package is being installed. The --ignorearch and --ignoreos options, when added to any install or upgrade command, will direct RPM to proceed with the install or upgrade, even if the package's platform doesn't match the install platform. Dangerous? Yes. But it can be indispensable in certain circumstances. Like the ability to override platform information at build-time, unless you know why you need to use --ignorearch or --ignoreos, you probably don't need to use them.

19.4 optflags -- The Other rpmrc File Entry
While the optflags entry doesn't play a part in determining the build or install platform, it does play a role in multi-platform package building. The optflags entry is used to define a standard set of options that can be used during the build process, specifically during compilation. The optflags entry looks like this:
optflags:

For example, assume the following optflags entries were placed in an rpmrc file:
optflags: i386 -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce optflags: sparc -O2

If RPM was running on an Intel 80386-compatible architecture, the optflags value would be set to -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce. If, however, RPM was running on a Sun SPARC-based system, optflags would be set to -O2. This entry sets the RPM_OPT_FLAGS environment variable, which can be used in the %prep, %build, and %install scripts.


360 Chapter 19: Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems

19.5 Platform-Dependent Tags
Once RPM has determined the build platform's information, that information can be used in the build process. The first way this information can be used is to determine whether a given package should be built on a given platform. This is done through the use of four tags that can be added to a spec file. There can be many reasons to do this. For example, the software may not build correctly on a given platform. Or the software may be platform-specific, such that packaging the software on any other platform, while technologically possible, would really make no sense. The real world is not always so clear-cut, so there might even be cases where a package should be built on, say, three different platforms, but no others. By carefully using the following tags, any conceivable situation can be covered. Like the rpmrc file entries we've already discussed, there are identical tags for architecture and operating system, so we'll discuss them together.

19.5.1 The excludexxx Tag
The excludexxx tags are used to direct RPM to insure that the package does not attempt to build on the excluded platforms. One or more platforms may be specified after the excludexxx tags, separated by either spaces or commas. Here are two examples:
ExcludeArch: sparc alpha ExcludeOS: Irix

The first line prevents systems based on the Sun SPARC and Digital Alpha/AXP architectures from attempting to build the package. The second line insures that the package will not be built for the Silicon Graphics operating system, Irix. If a build is attempted on an excluded architecture or operating system, the following message will be displayed, and the build will fail:
# rpm -ba cdplayer-1.0.spec Arch mismatch! cdplayer-1.0.spec doesn't build on this architecture


Section 19.6:Platform-Dependent Conditionals

361

#

The excludexxx tags are meant to explicitly prevent a finite set of architectures or operating systems from building a package. If your goal is to insure that a package will only build on one architecture, then you should use the exclusivexxx tags.

19.5.2 The exclusivexxx Tag
The exclusivexxx tags are used to direct RPM to only build the package on the specified platforms. These tags insure that, in the future, no brand-new platform will mistakenly attempt to build the package. RPM will build the package on the specified platforms only. The syntax of the exclusivexxx tags is identical to excludexxx:
ExclusiveArch: sparc alpha ExclusiveOS: Irix

In the first line, the package will only build on a Sun SPARC or Digital Alpha/AXP system. In the second, the package will only be built on the Irix operating system. The exclusivexxx tags are meant to explicitly allow a finite set of architectures or operating systems to build a package. If your goal is to insure that a package will not build on a specific platform, then you should use the excludexxx tag.

19.6 Platform-Dependent Conditionals
Of course, the control exerted by the excludexxx and exclusivexxx tags over package building is often too coarse. There may be packages, for example, that would build just fine on another platform, if only you could substitute a platform-specific patch file or change some paths in the %files list. The key to exerting this kind of platform-specific control in the spec file is to use RPM's conditionals. The conditionals provide a general-purpose means of constructing a platform-specific version of the spec file during the actual build process.


362 Chapter 19: Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems

19.6.1 Common Features of All Conditionals
There are a few things that are common to each conditional, so let's discuss them first. The first thing is that conditionals are block-structured. The second is that conditionals can be nested. Finally, conditionals can span any part of the spec file. Conditionals Are Block Structured Every conditional is block-structured -- in other words, the conditional begins at a certain point within the spec file and continues some number of lines until it is ended. This forms a block that will be used or ignored, depending on the platform the conditional is checking for, as well as the build platform itself. Every conditional starts with a line beginning with the characters %if and is followed by one of four platform-related conditions. Every conditional ends with a line containing the characters %endif. Ignoring the platform-related conditions for a moment, here's an example of a conditional block:
%ifos Linux Summary: This is a package for the Linux operating system %endif

It's a one-line block, but a block nonetheless. There's also another style of conditional block. As before, it starts with a %if, and ends with a %endif. But there's something new in the middle:
%ifos Linux Summary: This is a package for the Linux operating system %else Summary: This is a package for some other operating system %endif

Here we've replaced one summary tag with another.


Section 19.6:Platform-Dependent Conditionals

363

Conditionals Can Be Nested Conditionals can be nested -- That is, the block formed by one conditional can enclose another conditional. Here's an example:
%ifarch i386 echo "This is an i386" %ifos Linux echo "This is a Linux system" %else echo "This is not a Linux system" %endif %else echo "This is not an i386" %endif

In this example, the first tains a complete %ifos system was Intel-based, was not Intel-based, the

conditional block formed by the %ifarch i386 line con-- %else -- %endif conditional. Therefore, if the build the %ifos conditional would be tested. If the build system %ifos conditional would not be tested.

Conditionals Can Cross Spec File Sections The next thing each conditional has in common is that there is no limit to the number of lines a conditional block can contain. You could enclose the entire spec file within a conditional, if you like. But it's much better to use conditionals to insert only the appropriate platform-specific contents. Now that we have the basics out of the way, let's take a look at each of the conditionals and see how they work.

19.6.2 %ifxxx
The %ifxxx conditionals are used to control the inclusion of a block, as long as the platform-dependent information is true. Here are two examples:
%ifarch i386 alpha


364 Chapter 19: Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems

In this case, the block following the conditional would be included only if the build architecture was i386 or alpha.
%ifos Linux

This example would include the block following the conditional only if the operating system was Linux.

19.6.3 %ifnxxx
The %ifnxxx conditionals are used to control the inclusion of a block, as long as the platform-dependent information is not true. Here are two examples:
%ifnarch i386 alpha

In this case, the block following the conditional would be included only if the build architecture was not i386 or alpha.
%ifnos Linux

This example would include the block following the conditional only if the operating system was not Linux.

19.7 Hints and Kinks
There isn't much in the way of hard and fast rules when it comes to multi-platform package building. But in general, the following uses of RPM's multi-platform capabilities seem to work the best: · · The excludexxx and exclusivexxx tags are best used when it's known there's no reason for the package to be built on specific architectures. The %ifxxx and %ifnxxx conditionals are most likely to be used in the following areas: · Controlling the inclusion of %patch macros for platform-specific patches.


Section 19.7:Hints and Kinks

365

· ·

Setting up platform-specific initialization prior to building the software. Tailoring the %files list when the software creates platform-specific files.

Given that some software is more easily ported to different platforms than others, this list is far from complete. If there's one thing to remember about multi-platform package building, it's don't be afraid to experiment!


366 Chapter 19: Building Packages for Multiple Architectures and Operating Systems


Section 20.1:An Overview of Amanda

367

20

Real-World Package Building

In Chapter 11, Building Packages: A Simple Example, we packaged a fairly simple application. Since our goal was to introduce package building, we kept things as simple as possible. However, things aren't always that simple in the real world. In this chapter, we'll package a RPM's capabilities. We'll start with a completed package, just application that you'd not seen more complex application that will call on most of with a general overview of the application and end as you would if you were tasked with packaging an before.

So without further ado, let's meet amanda...

20.1 An Overview of Amanda
Amanda is a network backup utility. The name amanda stands for "Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver". If the word "Maryland" seems somewhat incongruous, it helps to realize that the program was developed at the University of Maryland by James Da Silva, and has subsequently been enhanced by many people around the world. The sources are available at ftp.cs.umd.edu, in directory /pub/amanda. At the time of writing, the latest version of amanda is version 2.3.0. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the amanda source tar file is called amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz. As with most network-centric applications, amanda has a server component, and a client component. An amanda server controls how the various client systems are backed up to the server's tape drive. Each amanda client uses the operating system's native dump utility to perform the actual backup, which is then compressed and sent to the server. A server can back itself up simply by having the client software installed and configured, just like any other client system. The software builds with make, and most customization is done in two .h files in the config subdirectory. A fair amount of documentation is available in the doc subdirectory. All in all, amanda is a typical non-trivial application. Amanda can be built on several Unix-based operating systems. In this chapter, we'll build and package amanda for Red Hat Linux Linux version 4.0.


368

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

20.2 Initial Building Without RPM
Since amanda can be built on numerous platforms, there needs to be some initial customization when first building the software. Since customization implies that mistakes will be made, we'll start off by building amanda without any involvement on the part of RPM. But before we can build amanda, we have to get it and unpack it, first.

20.2.1 Setting Up A Test Build Area
As we mentioned above, the home FTP site for amanda is ftp.cs.umd.edu. The sources are in /pub/amanda. After getting the sources, it's necessary to unpack them. We'll unpack them into RPM's SOURCES directory, so that we can keep all our work in one place:
# tar zxvf amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz amanda-2.3.0/ amanda-2.3.0/COPYRIGHT amanda-2.3.0/Makefile amanda-2.3.0/README ... amanda-2.3.0/man/amtape.8 amanda-2.3.0/tools/ amanda-2.3.0/tools/munge ...

As we saw, the sources unpacked into a directory called amanda-2.3.0. Let's rename that directory to amanda-2.3.0-orig, and unpack the sources again:
# ls total 177 drwxr-xr-x 11 adm games 1024 May 19 1996 amanda-2.3.0/ -rw-r--r-1 root root 178646 Nov 20 10:42 amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz # mv amanda-2.3.0 amanda-2.3.0-orig # tar zxvf amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz amanda-2.3.0/ amanda-2.3.0/COPYRIGHT amanda-2.3.0/Makefile amanda-2.3.0/README ...


Section 20.2:Initial Building Without RPM

369

amanda-2.3.0/man/amtape.8 amanda-2.3.0/tools/ amanda-2.3.0/tools/munge # ls total 178 drwxr-xr-x 11 adm games drwxr-xr-x 11 adm games -rw-r--r-1 root root #

1024 May 19 1996 amanda-2.3.0/ 1024 May 19 1996 amanda-2.3.0-orig/ 178646 Nov 20 10:42 amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz

Now why did we do that? The reason lies in the fact that we will undoubtedly need to make changes to the original sources in order to get amanda to build on Linux. We'll do all our hacking in the amanda-2.3.0 directory, and leave the amanda2.3.0-orig untouched. Since one of RPM's design features is to build packages from the original, unmodified sources, that means the changes we'll make will need to be kept as a set of patches. The amanda-2.3.0-orig directory will let us issue a simple recursive diff command to create our patches when the time comes. Now that our sources are unpacked, it's time to work on building the software.

20.2.2 Getting Software to build
Looking at the docs/INSTALL file, we find that the steps required to get amanda configured and ready to build are actually fairly simple. The first step is to modify tools/munge to point to cpp, the C preprocessor. Amanda uses CPP to create makefiles containing the appropriate configuration information. This approach is a bit unusual, but not unheard of. In munge, we find the following section:
# Customize CPP to point to your system's C preprocessor. # if cpp is on your path: CPP=cpp # # # # if cpp is not on your path, try one of these: CPP=/lib/cpp # traditional CPP=/usr/lib/cpp # also traditional CPP=/usr/ccs/lib/cpp # Solaris 2.x


370

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

Since cpp exists in /lib on Red Hat Linux, we need to change this part of munge to:
# Customize CPP to point to your system's C preprocessor. # if cpp is on your path: #CPP=cpp # if cpp is not on your path, try one of these: CPP=/lib/cpp # traditional # CPP=/usr/lib/cpp # also traditional # Solaris 2.x # CPP=/usr/ccs/lib/cpp

Next, we need to take a look in config/ and create two files: 1. 2. config.h -- contains platform-specific configuration information options.h -- contains site-specific configuration information

There are a number of example config.h files for a number of different platforms. There is a Linux-specific version, so we copy that file to config.h and review it. After a few changes to reflect our Red Hat Linux Linux environment, it's ready. Now let's turn our attention to options.h. In the case of options.h, there's only one example file called options.hvanilla. As the name implies, this is a basic file that contains a series of #defines that configure amanda for a typical environment. We'll need to make a few changes: · · · Define the paths to common utility programs. Keep the programs from being named with the suffix -2.3.0. Define the directories where the programs should be installed.

While the first change is pretty much standard fare for anyone used to building software, the last two changes are really due to RPM. With RPM, there's no need to name


Section 20.2:Initial Building Without RPM

371

the programs with a version-specific name, as RPM can easily upgrade to a new version and even downgrade back, if the new version doesn't work as well. The default paths amanda uses segregate the files so that they can be easily maintained. With RPM, there's no need to do this, since every file installed by RPM gets written into the database. In addition, Red Hat Linux systems adhere to the File System Standard, so any package destined for Red Hat systems should really be FSSTND-compliant, too. Fortunately for us, amanda was written to make these types of changes easy. But even if we had to hack an installation script, RPM would pick up the changes as part of its patch handling. We'll spare you the usual discovery of typos, incompatibilities, and the resulting rebuilds. After an undisclosed number of iterations, our config.h and options.h files are perfect. Amanda builds:
# make Making all in common-src make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/amanda-2.3.0/common-src' ... make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/amanda-2.3.0/man' #

As we noted, amanda is constructed so that most of the time changes will only be necessary in tools/munge, and the two files in config. Our situation was no different -- after all was said and done, that was all we needed to hack.

20.2.3 Installing and testing
As we all know, just because software builds doesn't mean that it's ready for primetime. It's necessary to test it first. In order to test amanda, we need to install it. Amanda's makefile has an install target, so let's use that to get started. We'll also get a copy of the output, because we'll need that later:
# make install Making install in common-src ... make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/amanda-2.3.0/client-src' Installing Amanda client-side programs: install -c -o bin amandad /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin sendsize /usr/lib/amanda


372

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

install -c -o bin calcsize /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin sendbackup-dump /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin sendbackup-gnutar /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin runtar /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin selfcheck /usr/lib/amanda Setting permissions for setuid-root client programs: (cd /usr/lib/amanda ; chown root calcsize; chmod u+s calcsize) (cd /usr/lib/amanda ; chown root runtar; chmod u+s runtar) ... Making install in server-src Installing Amanda libexec programs: install -c -o bin taper /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin dumper /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin driver /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin planner /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin reporter /usr/lib/amanda install -c -o bin getconf /usr/lib/amanda Setting permissions for setuid-root libexec programs: (cd /usr/lib/amanda ; chown root dumper; chmod u+s dumper) (cd /usr/lib/amanda ; chown root planner; chmod u+s planner) Installing Amanda user programs: install -c -o bin amrestore /usr/sbin install -c -o bin amadmin /usr/sbin install -c -o bin amflush /usr/sbin install -c -o bin amlabel /usr/sbin install -c -o bin amcheck /usr/sbin install -c -o bin amdump /usr/sbin install -c -o bin amcleanup /usr/sbin install -c -o bin amtape /usr/sbin Setting permissions for setuid-root user programs: (cd /usr/sbin ; chown root amcheck; chmod u+s amcheck) ... Installing Amanda changer libexec programs: install -c -o bin chg-generic /usr/lib/amanda ... Installing Amanda man pages: install -c -o bin amanda.8 /usr/man/man8 install -c -o bin amadmin.8 /usr/man/man8 install -c -o bin amcheck.8 /usr/man/man8 install -c -o bin amcleanup.8 /usr/man/man8 install -c -o bin amdump.8 /usr/man/man8 install -c -o bin amflush.8 /usr/man/man8 install -c -o bin amlabel.8 /usr/man/man8 install -c -o bin amrestore.8 /usr/man/man8 install -c -o bin amtape.8 /usr/man/man8


Section 20.2:Initial Building Without RPM

373

... #

OK, no major problems there. Amanda does require a bit of additional effort to get everything running, though. Looking at docs/INSTALL, we follow the steps to get amanda running on our test system, as both a client and a server. As we perform each step, we note it for future reference: · For the client: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. · Set up a ~/.rhosts file allowing the server to connect. Make the disk device files readable by the client. Make /etc/dumpdates readable and writeable by the client. Put an amanda entry in /etc/services. Put an amanda entry in /etc/inetd.conf. Issue a kill -HUP on inetd.

For the server: 1. 2. 3. 4. Create a directory to hold the server configuration files. Modify the provided example configuration files to suit our site. Add crontab entries to run amanda nightly. Put an amanda entry in /etc/services.

Once everything is ready, we run a few tests. Everything performs flawlessly. 1Looks like we've got a good build. Let's start getting RPM involved.
1 Well, eventually it did!


374

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

20.3 Initial Building With RPM
Now that amanda has been configured, built, and is operational on our build system, it's time to have RPM take over each of these tasks. The first task is to have RPM make the necessary changes to the original sources. To do that, RPM needs a patch file.

20.3.1 Generating patches
The amanda-2.3.0 directory tree is where we did all our work building amanda. We need to take all the work we've done in that directory tree and compare it against the original sources contained in the amanda-2.3.0-orig directory tree. But before we do that, we need to clean things up a bit. Cleaning up the test build area Looking through our work tree, it has all sorts of junk in it: emacs save files, object files, and the executable programs. In order to generate a clean set of patches, all these extraneous files must go. Looking over amanda's makefiles, there is a clean target that should take care of most of the junk:
# make clean Making clean in common-src ... rm -f *~ *.o *.a genversion version.c Makefile.out ... Making clean in client-src ... rm -f amandad sendsize calcsize sendbackup-dump sendbackup-gnutar runtar selfcheck *~ *.o Makefile.out ... Making clean in server-src ... rm -f amrestore amadmin amflush amlabel amcheck amdump amcleanup amtape taper dumper driver planner reporter getconf *~ *.o Makefile.out ... Making clean in changer-src ... rm -f chg-generic *~ *.o Makefile.out ... Making clean in man


Section 20.3:Initial Building With RPM

375

... rm -f *~ Makefile.out ... #

Looking in the tools and config directories where we did all our work, we see there are still emacs save files there. A bit of studying confirms that the makefiles don't bother to clean these two directories. That's a nice touch because a make clean won't wipe out old copies of the config files, giving you a chance to go back to them in case you've botched something. However, in our case, we're sure we won't need the save files, so out they go:
# cd /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/amanda-2.3.0 # find . -name "*~" -exec rm -vf \; ./config/config.h~ ./config/options.h~ ./tools/munge~ #

We let find take a look at the whole directory tree, just in case there was something still out there that we'd forgotten about. As you can see, the only save files are from the three files we've been working on. You'll note that we've left our modified munge file, as well as the config.h and options.h files we so carefully crafted. That's intentional, as we want to make sure those changes are applied when RPM patches the sources. Everything looks pretty clean, so it's time to make the patches. Actually Generating patches This step is actually pretty anticlimactic:
# diff -uNr amanda-2.3.0-orig/ amanda-2.3.0/ > amanda-2.3.0-linux.patch #

With that one command, we've compared each file in the untouched directory tree (amanda-2.3.0-orig) with the directory tree we've been working in (amanda-


376

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

2.3.0). If we've done our homework, the only things in the patch file should be related to the files we've changed. Let's take a look through it to make sure:
# cd /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES # cat amanda-2.3.0-linux.patch diff -uNr amanda-2.3.0-orig/config/config.h amanda-2.3.0/config/config.h --- amanda-2.3.0-orig/config/config.h Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969 +++ amanda-2.3.0/config/config.h Sat Nov 16 16:22:47 1996 @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ ... diff -uNr amanda-2.3.0-orig/config/options.h amanda-2.3.0/config/options.h --- amanda-2.3.0-orig/config/options.h Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969 +++ amanda-2.3.0/config/options.h Sat Nov 16 17:08:57 1996 @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@ ... diff -uNr amanda-2.3.0-orig/tools/munge amanda-2.3.0/tools/munge --- amanda-2.3.0-orig/tools/munge Sun May 19 22:11:25 1996 +++ amanda-2.3.0/tools/munge Sat Nov 16 16:23:50 1996 @@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ # Customize CPP to point to your system's C preprocessor. # if cpp is on your path: -CPP=cpp +# CPP=cpp # if cpp is not on your path, try one of these: -# CPP=/lib/cpp # traditional +CPP=/lib/cpp # traditional # CPP=/usr/lib/cpp # also traditional # CPP=/usr/ccs/lib/cpp # Solaris 2.x #

The patch file contains complete copies of our config.h and options.h files, followed by the changes we've made to munge. Looks good! Time to hand this grunt work over to RPM.

20.3.2 Making a first-cut spec file
Since amanda comes in two parts, it's obvious we'll need to use subpackages: one for the client software, and one for the server. Given that, and the fact that the first part of any spec file consists of tags that are easily filled in, let's sit down and fill in the blanks, tag-wise:


Section 20.3:Initial Building With RPM

377

Summary: Amanda Network Backup System Name: amanda Version: 2.3.08 Release: 1 Group: System/Backup Copyright: BSD-like, but see COPYRIGHT file for details Packager: Edward C. Bailey URL: http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/amanda/ Source: ftp://ftp.cs.umd.edu/pub/amanda/amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz Patch: amanda-2.3.0-linux.patch %description Amanda is a client/server backup system. It uses standard tape devices and networking, so all you need is any working tape drive and a network. You can use it for local backups as well.

That part was pretty easy. We set the package's release number to 1. We'll undoubtedly be changing that as we continue work on the spec file. You'll notice that we've included a URL tag line; the Uniform Resource Locator there points to the homepage for the amanda project, making it easier for the user to get additional information on amanda. The Source tag above includes the name of the original source tar file and is preceded by the URL pointing to the file's primary location. Again, this makes it easy for the user to grab a copy of the sources from the software's "birthplace". Finally, the patch file that we've just created gets a line of its own on the Patch tag line. Next, let's take a look at the tags for our two subpackages. Let's start with the client:
%package client Summary: Client-side Amanda package Group: System/Backup Requires: dump %description client The Amanda Network Backup system contains software necessary to automatically perform backups across a network. Amanda consists of two packages -- a client (this package), and a server: The client package enable a network-capable system to have its filesystems backed up by a system running the Amanda server. NOTE: In order for a system to perform backups of itself, install both


378

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

the client and server packages!

The %package directive names the package. Since we wanted the subpackages to be named amanda-, we didn't use the -n option. This means our client subpackage will be called amanda-client, just as we wanted. RPM requires unique summary, %description, and group tags for each subpackage, so we've included them. Of course, it would be a good idea even if RPM didn't require them -- we've used the tags to provide client-specific information. The requires tag is the only other tag in the client subpackage. Since amanda uses dump on the client system, we included this tag so that RPM will ensure that the dump package is present on client systems. Next, let's take a look at the tags for the server subpackage:
%package server Summary: Server-side Amanda package Group: System/Backup %description server The Amanda Network Backup system contains software necessary to automatically perform backups across a network. Amanda consists of two package -- a client, and a server (this package): The server package enables a or more Amanda client systems will direct all backups to a the server system requires a network-capable system to control one performing backups. The server system locally attached tape drive. Therefore, tape drive.

NOTE: In order for a system to perform backups of itself, install both the client and server packages!

No surprises here, really. You'll note that the server subpackage has no requires tag for the dump package. The reason for that is due to a design decision we've made. Since amanda is comprised of a client and a server component, in order for the server system to perform backups of itself, the client component must be installed. Since we've already made the client subpackage require dump, we've already covered the bases.


Section 20.3:Initial Building With RPM

379

Since an amanda server cannot back itself up without the client software, why don't we have the server subpackage require the client subpackage? Well, that could be done, but the fact of the matter is that there are cases where an amanda server won't need to back itself up. So the server subpackage needs no package requirements. Adding the build-time scripts Next we need to add the build-time scripts. There's really not much to them:
%prep %setup %build make %install make install

The %prep script consists of one line containing the simplest flavor of %setup macro. Since we only need %setup to unpack one set of sources, there are no options we need to add. The %build script is just as simple, with the single make command required to build amanda. Finally, the %install script maintains our singe-line trend for build-time scripts. Here a simple make install will put all the files where they need to be for RPM to package them. Adding %files Lists The last part of our initial attempt at a spec file is a %files list for each package the spec file will build. Since we're planning on a client and a server subpackage, we'll need two %files lists. For the time being, we'll just add the %files lines -- we'll be adding the actual filenames later:
%files client %file server


380

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

There's certainly more to come, but this is enough to get us started. And the first thing we want RPM to do is to unpack the amanda sources.

20.3.3 Getting the original sources unpacked
In keeping with a step-by-step approach, RPM has an option that let's us stop the build process after the %prep script has run. Let's give the -bp option a try, and see how things look:
# rpm -bp amanda-2.3.0.spec * Package: amanda * Package: amanda-client * Package: amanda-server + umask 022 + echo Executing: %prep Executing: %prep + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf amanda-2.3.0 + gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz + tar -xvvf drwxr-xr-x 3/20 0 May 19 22:10 1996 amanda-2.3.0/ -rw-r--r-- 3/20 1389 May 19 22:11 1996 amanda-2.3.0/COPYRIGHT -rw-r--r-- 3/20 1958 May 19 22:11 1996 amanda-2.3.0/Makefile -rw-r--r-- 3/20 11036 May 19 22:11 1996 amanda-2.3.0/README ... -rw-r--r-- 3/20 2010 May 19 22:11 1996 amanda-2.3.0/man/amtape.8 drwxr-xr-x 3/20 0 May 19 22:11 1996 amanda-2.3.0/tools/ -rwxr-xr-x 3/20 2437 May 19 22:11 1996 amanda-2.3.0/tools/munge + [ 0 -ne 0 ] + cd amanda-2.3.0 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0 + chown -R root.root . + chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 #

By looking at the output, it would be pretty hard to miss the fact that the sources were unpacked. If we look in RPM's default build area (/usr/src/redhat/BUILD), we'll see an amanda directory tree:
# cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/ # ls -l


Section 20.3:Initial Building With RPM

381

total 3 drwxr-xr-x #

11 root

root

1024 May 19

1996 amanda-2.3.0

After a quick look around, it seems like the sources were unpacked properly. But wait -- where are our carefully crafted configuration files in config? Why isn't tools/munge modified?

20.3.4 Getting patches properly applied
Ah, perhaps our %prep script was a bit too simple. We need to apply our patch. So let's add two things to our spec file: 1. 2. A patch tag line pointing to our patch file A %patch macro in our %prep script

Easy enough. At the top of the spec file, along with the other tags, let's add:
Patch: amanda-2.3.0-linux.patch

Then we'll make our %prep script look like this:
%prep %setup %patch -p 1

There, that should do it. Let's give that -bp option another try:
# rpm -bp amanda-2.3.0.spec * Package: amanda * Package: amanda-client * Package: amanda-server + umask 022 + echo Executing: %prep Executing: %prep + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf amanda-2.3.0 + gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz + tar -xvvf -


382

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

drwxr-xr-x 3/20 0 May 19 22:10 -rw-r--r-- 3/20 1389 May 19 22:11 -rw-r--r-- 3/20 1958 May 19 22:11 -rw-r--r-- 3/20 11036 May 19 22:11 ... -rw-r--r-- 3/20 2010 May 19 22:11 drwxr-xr-x 3/20 0 May 19 22:11 -rwxr-xr-x 3/20 2437 May 19 22:11 + [ 0 -ne 0 ] + cd amanda-2.3.0 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0 + chown -R root.root . + chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w . + echo Patch #0: Patch #0: + patch -p1 -s + exit 0 #

1996 1996 1996 1996

amanda-2.3.0/ amanda-2.3.0/COPYRIGHT amanda-2.3.0/Makefile amanda-2.3.0/README

1996 amanda-2.3.0/man/amtape.8 1996 amanda-2.3.0/tools/ 1996 amanda-2.3.0/tools/munge

Not much difference, until the very end, where we see the patch being applied. Let's take a look into the build area and see if our configuration files are there:
# cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/config # ls -l total 58 -rw-r--r-1 root root 7518 May 19 -rw-r--r-1 root root 1846 Nov 20 -rw-r--r-1 root root 2081 May 19 -rw-r--r-1 root root 1690 May 19 ... -rw-r--r-1 root root 1830 May 19 -rw-r--r-1 root root 0 Nov 20 -rw-r--r-1 root root 7196 Nov 20 -rw-r--r-1 root root 7236 May 19 -rw-r--r-1 root root 0 Nov 20 #

1996 20:46 1996 1996 1996 20:46 20:46 1996 20:46

config-common.h config.h config.h-aix config.h-bsdi1 config.h-ultrix4 config.h.orig options.h options.h-vanilla options.h.orig

Much better. Those zero-length .orig files are a dead giveaway that patch has been here, as are the dates on config.h, and options.h. In the tools directory, munge has been modified, too. These sources are ready for building!


Section 20.3:Initial Building With RPM

383

20.3.5 Letting RPM do the Building
We know that the sources are ready. We know that the %build script is ready. There shouldn't be much in the way of surprises if we let RPM build amanda. Let's use the -bc option to stop things after the %build script completes:
# rpm -bc amanda-2.3.0.spec * Package: amanda * Package: amanda-client * Package: amanda-server ... echo Executing: %build Executing: %build + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd amanda-2.3.0 + make Making all in common-src make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/common-src' ../tools/munge Makefile.in Makefile.out make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/common-src' cc -g -I. -I../config -c error.c -o error.o cc -g -I. -I../config -c alloc.c -o alloc.o ... Making all in man make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/man' ../tools/munge Makefile.in Makefile.out make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/man' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/man' make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/man' + exit 0 #

As we thought, no surprises. A quick look through the build area shows a full assortment of binaries, all ready to be installed. So it seems that the most natural thing to do next would be to let RPM install amanda.

20.3.6 Letting RPM do the Installing
And that's just what we're going to do! Our %install script has the necessary make install command, so let's give it a shot:


384

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

# rpm -bi amanda-2.3.0.spec * Package: amanda * Package: amanda-client * Package: amanda-server ... echo Executing: %build Executing: %build + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd amanda-2.3.0 + make Making all in common-src make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/common-src' ../tools/munge Makefile.in Makefile.out make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/common-src' cc -g -I. -I../config -c error.c -o error.o cc -g -I. -I../config -c alloc.c -o alloc.o ... + umask 022 + echo Executing: %install Executing: %install + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd amanda-2.3.0 + make install Making install in common-src make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/common-src' ... install -c -o bin amrestore.8 /usr/man/man8 install -c -o bin amtape.8 /usr/man/man8 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/man' make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/amanda-2.3.0/man' + exit 0 + umask 022 + echo Executing: special doc Executing: special doc + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd amanda-2.3.0 + DOCDIR=//usr/doc/amanda-2.3.0-1 + DOCDIR=//usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-1 + DOCDIR=//usr/doc/amanda-server-2.3.0-1 + exit 0 #


Section 20.4:Package Building

385

Everything looks pretty good. At this point, the amanda software, built by RPM, has been installed on the build system. Since performed all the configuration steps before, when we were manually building amanda, everything should still be configured properly to test this new build. 2So why don't we give the new binaries a try?

20.3.7 Testing RPM's Handiwork
After a quick double-check to ensure that all the configuration steps were still in place from our manual build, we reran our tests. No problems were found. It's time to build some packages!

20.4 Package Building
OK, let's go for broke and tell RPM to do the works, including the creation of the binary and source packages:
# rpm -ba amanda-2.3.0.spec * Package: amanda * Package: amanda-client * Package: amanda-server ... echo Executing: %build Executing: %build + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd amanda-2.3.0 + make Making all in common-src ... + echo Executing: %install Executing: %install + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd amanda-2.3.0 + make install Making install in common-src ... + echo Executing: special doc Executing: special doc ... Binary Packaging: amanda-client-2.3.0-1 Finding dependencies... 2 Of course, if the process of installing the software changed some necessary config files, they would have to be redone, but in this case it didn't happen.


386

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

Requires (1): dump 1 block Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/amanda-client-2.3.0-1.i386.rpm Binary Packaging: amanda-server-2.3.0-1 Finding dependencies... 1 block Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/amanda-server-2.3.0-1.i386.rpm + umask 022 + echo Executing: %clean Executing: %clean + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd amanda-2.3.0 + exit 0 Source Packaging: amanda-2.3.0-1 amanda-2.3.0.spec amanda-2.3.0-linux.patch amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz 374 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/amanda-2.3.0-1.src.rpm #

Great! Let's take a look at our handiwork:
# cd /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/ # ls -l total 2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1246 Nov 20 21:19 amanda-client-2.3.0-1.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1308 Nov 20 21:19 amanda-server-2.3.0-1.i386.rpm #

Hmmm, those binary packages look sort of small. We'd better see what's in there:
# rpm -qilp amanda-*-1.i386.rpm Name : amanda-client Distribution: Version : 2.3.0 Vendor: Release :1 Build Date: Install date: (none) Build Host: Group : System/Backup Source RPM: Size :0 Summary : Client-side Amanda package (none) (none) Wed Nov 20 21:19:44 1996 moocow.rpm.org amanda-2.3.0-1.src.rpm


Section 20.4:Package Building

387

Description : The Amanda Network Backup system contains software necessary to automatically perform backups across a network. Amanda consists of two packages -- a client (this package), and a server: The client package enable a network-capable system to have its filesystems backed up by a system running the Amanda server. NOTE: In order for a system to perform backups of itself, install both the client and server packages! (contains no files) Name : amanda-server Distribution: (none) Version : 2.3.0 Vendor: (none) Release :1 Build Date: Wed Nov 20 21:19:44 1996 Install date: (none) Build Host: moocow.rpm.org Group : System/Backup Source RPM: amanda-2.3.0-1.src.rpm :0 Size Summary : Server-side Amanda package Description : The Amanda Network Backup system contains software necessary to automatically perform backups across a network. Amanda consists of two package -- a client, and a server (this package): The server package enables a or more Amanda client systems will direct all backups to a the server system requires a network-capable system to control one performing backups. The server system locally attached tape drive. Therefore, tape drive.

NOTE: In order for a system to perform backups of itself, install both the client and server packages! (contains no files) #

What do they mean, (contains no files)? The spec file has perfectly good %files lists... Oops.


388

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

20.4.1 Creating the %files list
Everything was going so smoothly, we forgot that the %files lists were going to need files. No problem, we just need to put the filenames in there, and we'll be all set. But is it really that easy? How to find the installed files? Luckily, it's not too bad. Since we saved the output from our first make install, we can see the filenames as they're installed. Of course, it's important to make sure the install output is valid. Fortunately for us, amanda didn't require much fiddling by the time we got it built and tested. If it had, we would have had to get more recent output from the installation phase. It's time for more decisions. We have one list of installed files, and two %files lists. It would be silly to put all the files in both %files lists, so we have to decide which file goes where. This is where experience with the software really pays off, because the wrong decision made here can result in awkward, ill-featured packages. Here's the %files list we came up with for the client subpackage:
%files client /usr/lib/amanda/amandad /usr/lib/amanda/sendsize /usr/lib/amanda/calcsize /usr/lib/amanda/sendbackup-dump /usr/lib/amanda/selfcheck /usr/lib/amanda/sendbackup-gnutar /usr/lib/amanda/runtar README COPYRIGHT docs/INSTALL docs/SYSTEM.NOTES docs/WHATS.NEW

The files in /usr/lib/amanda are all the client-side amanda programs, so that part was easy. The remaining files are part of the original source archive. Amanda doesn't install them, but they contain information that users should see.


Section 20.4:Package Building

389

Realizing that RPM can't package these files specified as they are, let's leave the client %files list for a moment, and check out the list for the server subpackage:
%files server /usr/sbin/amadmin /usr/sbin/amcheck /usr/sbin/amcleanup /usr/sbin/amdump /usr/sbin/amflush /usr/sbin/amlabel /usr/sbin/amrestore /usr/sbin/amtape /usr/lib/amanda/taper /usr/lib/amanda/dumper /usr/lib/amanda/driver /usr/lib/amanda/planner /usr/lib/amanda/reporter /usr/lib/amanda/getconf /usr/lib/amanda/chg-generic /usr/man/man8/amanda.8 /usr/man/man8/amadmin.8 /usr/man/man8/amcheck.8 /usr/man/man8/amcleanup.8 /usr/man/man8/amdump.8 /usr/man/man8/amflush.8 /usr/man/man8/amlabel.8 /usr/man/man8/amrestore.8 /usr/man/man8/amtape.8 README COPYRIGHT docs/INSTALL docs/KERBEROS docs/SUNOS4.BUG docs/SYSTEM.NOTES docs/TAPE.CHANGERS docs/WHATS.NEW docs/MULTITAPE example

The files in /usr/sbin are programs that will be run by the amanda administrator in order to perform backups and restores. The files in /usr/lib/amanda are the server-side programs that do the actual work during backups. Following that are a


390

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

number of man pages: one for each program to be run by the amanda administrator, and one with an overview of amanda. Bringing up the rear are a number of files that are not installed, but would be handy for the amanda administrator to have available. There is some overlap with the files that will be part of the client subpackage, but the additional files here discuss features that would interest only amanda administrators. Included here is the example subdirectory, which contains a few example configuration files for the amanda server. As in the client %files list, these last files can't be packaged by RPM as we've listed them. We need to use a few more of RPM's tricks to get them packaged. Applying Directives Since we'd like the client subpackage to include those files that are not normally installed, and since the files are documentation, let's use the %doc directive on them. That will accomplish two things: 1. 2. When the client subpackage is installed, it will direct RPM to place them in a package-specific directory in /usr/doc It will tag the files as being documentation, making it possible for users to easily track down the documentation with a simple rpm -qd command

In the course of looking over the %files lists, it becomes apparent that the directory /usr/lib/amanda will contain only files from the two amanda subpackages. If the subpackages are erased, the directory will remain, which won't hurt anything, but it isn't as neat as it could be. But if we add the directory to the list, RPM will automatically package every file in the directory. Since the files in that directory are part of both the client and the server subpackages, we'll need to use the %dir directive to instruct RPM to package only the directory. After these changes, here's what the client %files list looks like now:
%files client %dir /usr/lib/amanda/ /usr/lib/amanda/amandad /usr/lib/amanda/sendsize /usr/lib/amanda/calcsize /usr/lib/amanda/sendbackup-dump /usr/lib/amanda/selfcheck


Section 20.4:Package Building

391

/usr/lib/amanda/sendbackup-gnutar /usr/lib/amanda/runtar %doc README %doc COPYRIGHT %doc docs/INSTALL %doc docs/SYSTEM.NOTES %doc docs/WHATS.NEW

We've also applied the same directives to the server %files list:
%files server /usr/sbin/amadmin /usr/sbin/amcheck /usr/sbin/amcleanup /usr/sbin/amdump /usr/sbin/amflush /usr/sbin/amlabel /usr/sbin/amrestore /usr/sbin/amtape %dir /usr/lib/amanda/ /usr/lib/amanda/taper /usr/lib/amanda/dumper /usr/lib/amanda/driver /usr/lib/amanda/planner /usr/lib/amanda/reporter /usr/lib/amanda/getconf /usr/lib/amanda/chg-generic /usr/man/man8/amanda.8 /usr/man/man8/amadmin.8 /usr/man/man8/amcheck.8 /usr/man/man8/amcleanup.8 /usr/man/man8/amdump.8 /usr/man/man8/amflush.8 /usr/man/man8/amlabel.8 /usr/man/man8/amrestore.8 /usr/man/man8/amtape.8 %doc README %doc COPYRIGHT %doc docs/INSTALL %doc docs/KERBEROS %doc docs/SUNOS4.BUG %doc docs/SYSTEM.NOTES %doc docs/TAPE.CHANGERS %doc docs/WHATS.NEW


392

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

%doc docs/MULTITAPE %doc example

You'll note that we neglected to use the %doc directive on the man page files. The reason is that RPM automatically tags any file destined for /usr/man as documentation. Now our spec file has a complete set of tags, the two subpackages are defined, it has build-time scripts that work, and now, %files lists for each subpackage. Why don't we try that build again?
# rpm -ba amanda-2.3.0.spec * Package: amanda * Package: amanda-client * Package: amanda-server ... echo Executing: %build Executing: %build + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd amanda-2.3.0 + make Making all in common-src ... + echo Executing: %install Executing: %install + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd amanda-2.3.0 + make install Making install in common-src ... + echo Executing: special doc Executing: special doc ... Binary Packaging: amanda-client-2.3.0-6 Finding dependencies... Requires (3): libc.so.5 libdb.so.2 dump usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-6 usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-6/COPYRIGHT usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-6/INSTALL ... usr/lib/amanda/sendbackup-gnutar usr/lib/amanda/sendsize 1453 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/amanda-client-2.3.0-6.i386.rpm


Section 20.4:Package Building

393

Binary Packaging: amanda-server-2.3.0-6 Finding dependencies... Requires (2): libc.so.5 libdb.so.2 usr/doc/amanda-server-2.3.0-6 usr/doc/amanda-server-2.3.0-6/COPYRIGHT usr/doc/amanda-server-2.3.0-6/INSTALL ... usr/sbin/amrestore usr/sbin/amtape 3404 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/amanda-server-2.3.0-6.i386.rpm ... Source Packaging: amanda-2.3.0-6 amanda-2.3.0.spec amanda-2.3.0-linux.patch amanda-rpm-instructions.tar.gz amanda-2.3.0.tar.gz 393 blocks Generating signature: 0 Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/amanda-2.3.0-6.src.rpm #

If we take a quick look at the client and server subpackages, we find that, sure enough, this time they contain files:
# cd /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/ # ls -l amanda-* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 211409 Nov 21 15:56 amanda-client-2.3.0-1.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 512814 Nov 21 15:57 amanda-server-2.3.0-1.i386.rpm # rpm -qilp amanda-* Name : amanda-client Distribution: (none) Version : 2.3.0 Vendor: (none) Release :1 Build Date: Thu Nov 21 15:55:59 1996 Install date: (none) Build Host: moocow.rpm.org Group : System/Backup Source RPM: amanda-2.3.0-1.src.rpm Size : 737101 Summary : Client-side Amanda package Description : The Amanda Network Backup system contains software necessary to automatically perform backups across a network. Amanda consists of two packages -- a client (this package), and a server: The client package enable a network-capable system to have its


394

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

filesystems backed up by a system running the Amanda server. NOTE: In order for a system to perform backups of itself, install both the client and server packages! /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-1 /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-1/COPYRIGHT /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-1/INSTALL ... /usr/lib/amanda/sendbackup-gnutar /usr/lib/amanda/sendsize Name : amanda-server Distribution: (none) Version : 2.3.0 Vendor: (none) Release :1 Build Date: Thu Nov 21 15:55:59 1996 Install date: (none) Build Host: moocow.rpm.org Group : System/Backup Source RPM: amanda-2.3.0-1.src.rpm : 1733825 Size Summary : Server-side Amanda package Description : The Amanda Network Backup system contains software necessary to automatically perform backups across a network. Amanda consists of two package -- a client, and a server (this package): The server package enables a or more Amanda client systems will direct all backups to a the server system requires a network-capable system to control one performing backups. The server system locally attached tape drive. Therefore, tape drive.

NOTE: In order for a system to perform backups of itself, install both the client and server packages! /usr/doc/amanda-server-2.3.0-1 /usr/doc/amanda-server-2.3.0-1/COPYRIGHT /usr/doc/amanda-server-2.3.0-1/INSTALL ... /usr/sbin/amrestore /usr/sbin/amtape #

We're finally ready to test these packages!


Section 20.4:Package Building

395

20.4.2 Testing those first packages
The system we've built the packages on already has amanda installed. This is due to the build process itself. However, we can install the new packages on top of the already-existing files:
# cd /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 # rpm -ivh amanda-*-1.i386.rpm amanda-client ################################################## amanda-server ################################################## #

Running some tests, it looks like everything is running well. But back in Section 11.5.2, Testing Newly Built Packages, we mentioned that it was possible to install a newly-built package on the build system, and not realize that the package was missing files. Well, there's another reason why installing the package on the build-system for testing is a bad idea. Let's bring our packages to a different system, test them there, and see what happens. Installing the Package On A Different System Looks like we're almost through. Let's install the packages on another system that had not previously run amanda, and test it there:
# rpm -ivh amanda-*-1.i386.rpm amanda-client ################################################## amanda-server ################################################## #

The install went smoothly enough. up! The server configuration files, was missing. If we stop and think gone through all those steps on the aged as files.

However, testing did not. Why? Nothing was set the inetd.conf entry for the client, everything about it for a moment that makes sense: we had build system, but none of those steps can be pack-

After following the steps in the installation instructions, everything works. While we could expect users to do most of the grunt work associated with getting amanda


396

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

configured, RPM does have the ability to run scripts when packages are installed and erased. Why don't we use that feature to make life easier for our users?

20.4.3 Finishing Touches
At this point in the build process, we're on the home stretch. The software builds correctly and is packaged. It's time to stop looking at things from a "build the software" perspective, and time to starting looking at things from a "package the software" point of view. The difference lies in looking at the packages from the user's perspective. Does the package install easily, or does it require a lot of effort to make it operative? When the package is removed, does it clean up after itself, or does it leave bits and pieces strewn throughout the filesystem? Let's put a bit more effort into this spec file, and make life easier on our users. Creating Install Scripts When it comes to needing post-installation configuration, amanda certainly is no slouch! We'll work on the client first. Let's look at a section of the script we wrote, comment on it, and move on:
%post client # See if they've installed amanda before... # If they have, none of this should be necessary... if [ "$1" = 1 ]; then

First, we start the script with a %post statement, and indicate that this script is for the client subpackage. As the comments indicate, we only want to perform the following tasks if this is the first time the client subpackage has been installed. To do this, we use the first and only argument passed to the script. It is a number indicating how many instances of this package will be installed after the current installation is complete. If the argument is equal to 1, that means that no other instances of the client subpackage are presently installed, and that this one is the first. Let's continue:


Section 20.4:Package Building

397

# Set disk devices so that bin can read them # (This is actually done on Red Hat Linux; only need to add bin to # group disk) if grep "^disk::.*bin" /etc/group > /dev/null then true else # If there are any members in group disk, add bin after a comma... sed -e 's/\(^disk::[0-9]\{1,\}:.\{1,\}\)/\1,bin/' /etc/group > /etc/group.tmp # If there are no members in group disk, add bin... sed -e 's/\(^disk::[0-9]\{1,\}:$\)/\1bin/' /etc/group.tmp > /etc/group # clean up! rm -f /etc/group.tmp fi

One of amanda's requirements is that the user ID running the dumps on the client needs to be able to read from every disk's device file. The folks at Red Hat have done half the work for us by creating a group disk and giving that group read/write access to every disk device. Since our dumpuser is bin, we only need to add bin to the disk group. Two lines of sed, and we're done! The next section is related to the last. It also focuses on making sure bin can access everything it needs while doing backups:
# Also set /etc/dumpdates to be writable by group disk chgrp disk /etc/dumpdates chmod g+w /etc/dumpdates

Since amanda uses dump to obtain the backups, and since dump keeps track of backups in /etc/dumpdates, it's only natural that bin will need read/write cess to the file. In a perfect world, /etc/dumpdates would have already been to allow group disk to read and write, but we had to do it ourselves. It's not a problem, though.

the acset big


398

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

Next, we need to create the appropriate network-related entries, so that amanda clients can communicate with amanda servers, and vice versa:
# Add amanda line to /etc/services if grep "^amanda" /etc/services >/dev/null then true else echo "amanda 10080/udp # Added by package amanda-client" >> /etc/services fi

By using grep to look for lines that begin with the letters amanda, we can easily see if /etc/services is already configured properly. It it isn't, we simply append a line to the end. We also added a comment so that sysadmins will know where the entry came from, and either take our word for it or issue an rpm -q --scripts amanda-client command and see for themselves. We did it all on one line because it makes the script simpler. Let's look at the rest of the network-related part of this script:
# Add amanda line to /etc/inetd.conf if grep "^amanda" /etc/inetd.conf >/dev/null then true else echo "amanda dgram udp wait bin /usr/lib/amanda/amandad amandad # added by package amanda-client" >>/etc/inetd.conf # Kick inetd if [ -f /var/run/inetd.pid ]; then kill -HUP `cat /var/run/inetd.pid` fi fi fi


Section 20.4:Package Building

399

Here, we've used the same approach to add an entry to /etc/inetd.conf. We then hup inetd so the change will take affect, and we're done! Oh, and that last fi at the end? That's to close the if [ "$1" = 1 ] at the start of the script. Now let's look at the server's post-install script:
%post server # See if they've installed amanda before... if [ "$1" = 1 ]; then # Add amanda line to /etc/services if grep "^amanda" /etc/services >/dev/null then true else echo "amanda 10080/udp # Added by package amanda-server" >>/etc/services fi fi

That was short! And this huge difference brings up a good point about writing install scripts: It's important to understand what you as the package builder should do for the user, and what they should do for themselves. In the case of the client package, every one of the steps performed by the post-install script was something that a fairly knowledgeable user could have done. But each of these steps have one thing in common. No matter how the user configures amanda, these steps will never change. And given the nature of client/server applications, there's a good chance that many more amanda client packages will be installed than amanda servers. Would you like to be tasked with installing this package on twenty systems, and performing each of the steps we've automated, twenty times? We thought not. There is one step that we did not automate for the client package. The step we left out is the creation of a .rhosts file. Since this file must contain the name of the


400

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

amanda server, we have no way of knowing what the file should look like. Therefore, that's one step we can't automate. The server's post-install script is so short because there's little else that can be automated. The other steps required to set up an amanda server include: 1. 2. 3. 4. Choosing a configuration name, which requires user input Creating a directory to hold the server configuration files, named according to the configuration name, which depends on the first step Modifying example configuration files to suit the site, which requires user input Adding crontab entries to run amanda nightly, which requires user input

Since every step depends on the user making decisions, the best way to handle them is to not handle them at all. Let the user do it! Creating Uninstall Scripts Where there are install scripts, there are uninstall scripts. While there is no ironclad rule to that effect, it is a good practice. Following this practice, we have an uninstall script for the client package, and one for the server. Let's take the client first:
%postun client # First, see if we're the last amanda-client package on the system... # If not, then we don't need to do this stuff... if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then

As before, we start out with a declaration of the type of script this is, and which subpackage it is for. Following that we have an if statement similar to the one we used in the install scripts, save one difference. Here, we're comparing the argument against zero. The reason is that we are trying to see if there will be zero instances of this package after the uninstall is complete. If this is the case, the remainder of the script needs to be run, since there are no other amanda client packages left. Next, we remove bin from the disk group:
# First, get rid of bin from the disk group...


Section 20.4:Package Building

401

if grep "^disk::.*bin" /etc/group > /dev/null then # Nuke bin at the end of the line... sed -e 's/\(^disk::[0-9]\{1,\}:.\{1,\}\),bin$/\1/' /etc/group > /etc/group.tmp Nuke bin on the line by itself... sed -e 's/\(^disk::[0-9]\{1,\}:\)bin$/\1/' /etc/group.tmp > /etc/group1.tmp

#

#

Nuke bin in the middle of the line... sed -e 's/\(^disk::[0-9]\{1,\}:.\{1,\}\),bin,\(.\{1,\}\)/\1,\2/' /etc/group1.tmp > /etc/group Nuke bin at the start of the line... sed -e 's/\(^disk::[0-9]\{1,\}:\)bin,\(.\{1,\}\)/\1\2/' /etc/group2.tmp > /etc/group Clean up after ourselves... rm -f /etc/group.tmp /etc/group1.tmp /etc/group2.tmp

#

# fi

No surprises there. Continuing our uninstall, we start on the network-related tasks:
# Next, lose the amanda line in /etc/services... # We only want to do this if the server package isn't installed # Look for /usr/sbin/amdump, and leave it if there... if [ ! -f /usr/sbin/amdump ]; then if grep "^amanda" /etc/services > /dev/null then grep -v "^amanda" /etc/services > /etc/services.tmp mv -f /etc/services.tmp /etc/services fi fi

That's odd. Why are we looking for a file from the server package? If you look back at the install scripts for the client and server packages, you'll find that the one thing they have in common is that both the client and the server require the same entry in /etc/services.


402

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

If an amanda server is going to back itself up, it also needs the amanda client software. Therefore, both subpackages need to add an entry to /etc/services. But what if one of the packages is removed? Perhaps the server is being demoted to a client, or maybe the server is no longer going to be backed up using amanda. In these cases, the entry in /etc/services must stay. So, in the case of the client, we look for a file from the server subpackage, and if it's there, we leave the entry alone. Granted, this is a somewhat unsightly way to see if a certain package is installed. Some of you are probably even saying, "Why can't RPM be used? Just do an rpm -q amanda-server, and decide what to do based on that." And that would be the best way to do it, except for one small point: Only one invocation of RPM can run at any given time. Since RPM is running to perform the uninstall, if the uninstall-script were to attempt to run RPM again, it would fail. The reason it would fail is because only one copy of RPM can access the database at a time. So we are stuck with our unsightly friend. Continuing the network-related uninstall tasks:
# Finally, the amanda entry in /etc/inetd.conf if grep "^amanda" /etc/inetd.conf > /dev/null then grep -v "^amanda" /etc/inetd.conf > /etc/inetd.conf.tmp mv -f /etc/inetd.conf.tmp /etc/inetd.conf # Kick inetd if [ -f /var/run/inetd.pid ]; then kill -HUP `cat /var/run/inetd.pid` fi fi fi

Here, we're using grep's ability to return lines that don't match the search string, in order to remove every trace of amanda from /etc/inetd.conf. After issuing a hup on inetd, we're done.


Section 20.4:Package Building

403

On to the server. If you've been noticing a pattern between the various scripts, you won't be disappointed here:
%postun server # See if we're the last server package on the system... # If not, we don't need to do any of this stuff... if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then # Lose the amanda line in /etc/services... # We only want to do this if the client package isn't installed # Look for /usr/lib/amandad, and leave it if there... if [ ! -f /usr/lib/amanda/amandad ]; then if grep "^amanda" /etc/services > /dev/null then grep -v "^amanda" /etc/services > /etc/services.tmp mv -f /etc/services.tmp /etc/services fi fi fi

By now the opening if statement is an old friend. As you might have expected, we are verifying whether the client package is installed, by looking for a file from that package. If the client package isn't there, the entry is removed from /etc/services. And that, is that. Obviously, these scripts must be carefully tested. In the case of amanda, since the two subpackages have some measure of interdependency, it's necessary to try different sequences of installing and erasing the two packages to make sure the /etc/services logic works properly in all cases. After a bit of testing, our install and uninstall scripts pass with flying colors. From a technological standpoint, the client and server subpackages are ready to go.


404

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building

Bits and Pieces However, just because a package has been properly built, and installs and can be erased without problems, doesn't mean that the package builder's job is done. It's necessary to look at each newly-built package from the user's perspective. Does the package contain everything the user needs in order to deploy it effectively? Or will the user need to fiddle with it, guessing as they go? In the case of our amanda packages, it was obvious that some additional documentation was required so that the user would know what needed to be done in order to finalize the installation. Simply directing the user to the standard amanda documentation wasn't the right solution, either. Many of the steps outlined in the INSTALL document had already been done by the post-install scripts. No, an interim documente was required. Two, actually: one for the client, and one for the server. So two files were created, one to be added to each subpackage. The question was, how to do it? Essentially, there were two options: 1. 2. 3. Put the files in the amanda directory tree that had been used to perform the initial builds and generate a new patch file Create a tar file containing the two files, and modify the spec file to unpack the documentation into the amanda directory tree. Drop the files directly into the amanda directory tree without using tar.

Since the second approach was more interesting, that's the approach we chose. It required an additional source tag in the spec file:
Source1: amanda-rpm-instructions.tar.gz

Also required was an additional %setup macro in the %prep script:
%setup -T -D -a 1

While the %setup macro might look intimidating, it wasn't that hard to construct. Here's what each options means: · -T -- Do not perform the default archive unpacking.


Section 20.4:Package Building

405

· ·

-D -- Do not delete the directory before unpacking. -a1 -- Unpack the archive specified by the source1 tag after changing directory.

Finally, two additions to the %files lists were required. One for the client:
%doc amanda-client.README

And one for the server:
%doc amanda-server.README

At this point, the packages were complete. Certainly doesn't require this level of effort to package. Just as is much more of a challenge. Hopefully this chapter how to approach package building for more complex

there is software out there that certainly there is software that has given you some idea about applications.


406

Chapter 20:Real-World Package Building


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

407

21

A Guide to the RPM Library API

In this chapter, we'll explore the functions used internally by RPM. These functions are available for anyone to use, making it possible to add RPM functionality to new and existing programs. Rather than continually refer to "the RPM library" throughout this chapter, we'll use the name of the library's main include file -- rpmlib.

21.1 An Overview of rpmlib
There are a number of files that make up rpmlib. First and foremost, of course, is the rpmlib library, librpm.a. This library contains all the functions required to implement all the basic functions contained in RPM. The remaining files define the various data structures, parameters, and symbols used by rpmlib: · · · rpmlib.h dbindex.h header.h

In general, rpmlib.h will always be required. When using rpmlib's header-related functions, header.h will be required, while the database-related function will require dbindex.h. As each function is described in this chapter, we'll provide the function's prototype as well as the #include statements the function requires.

21.2 rpmlib Functions
There are more than sixty different functions in rpmlib. The tasks they perform range from low-level database record traversal, to high-level package manipulation. We've grouped the functions into different categories for easy reference.

21.2.1 Error Handling
The functions in this section perform rpmlib's basic error handling. All error handling centers on the use of specific status codes. The status codes are defined in rpmlib.h and are of the form RPMERR_xxx, where xxx is the name of the error.


408

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

Return Error Code -- rpmErrorCode()
#include int rpmErrorCode(void);

This function returns the error code set by the last rpmlib function that failed. Should only be used in an error callback function defined by rpmErrorSetCallBack(). Return Error String -- rpmErrorString()
#include char *rpmErrorString(void);

This function returns the error string set by the last rpmlib function that failed. Should only be used in an error callback function defined by rpmErrorSetCallBack(). Set Error CallBack Function -- rpmErrorSetCallback()
#include rpmErrorCallBackType rpmErrorSetCallback(rpmErrorCallBackType);

This function sets the current error callback function to the error callback function passed to it. The previous error callback function is returned.

21.2.2 Getting Package Information
The following functions are used to obtain information about a package file. It should be noted that most information is returned in the form of a Header structure. This data structure is widely used throughout rpmlib. We will discuss more header-related functions in Section 21.2.13, Header Manipulation and Section 21.2.14, Header Entry Manipulation. Read Package Information -- rpmReadPackageInfo()
#include #include int rpmReadPackageInfo(int fd,


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

409

Header * signatures, Header * hdr);

Given an open package on fd, read in the header and signature. This function operates as expected with both socket and pipe file descriptors passed as fd. Safe on nonseekable fds. When the function returns, fd is left positioned at the start of the package's archive section. If either signatures or hdr are NULL, information for the NULL parameter will not be passed back to the caller. Otherwise, they will return the package's signatures and header, respectively. This function returns the following status values: · · ·
0 1 2

-- Success. -- Bad magic numbers found in package. -- Other error.

Read Package Header -- rpmReadPackageHeader()
#include #include int rpmReadPackageHeader(int fd, Header * hdr, int * isSource, int * major, int * minor);

Given an open package on fd, read in the header. This function operates as expected with both socket and pipe file descriptors passed as fd. Safe on nonseekable fds. When the function returns, fd is left positioned at the start of the package's archive section. If hdr, isSource, major, or minor are NULL, information for the NULL parameter(s) will not be passed back to the caller. Otherwise, they will return the package's header (hdr), information on whether the package is a source package file or not (isSource),


410

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

and the package format's major and minor revision number (major and minor, respectively). This function returns the following status values: · · ·
0 1 2

-- Success. -- Bad magic numbers found in package. -- Other error.

21.2.3 Variable Manipulation
The following functions are used to get, set, and interpret RPM's internal variables. Variables are set according to various pieces of system information, as well as from rpmrc files. They control various aspects of RPM's operation. The variables have symbolic names in the form RPMVAR_xxx, where the variable. All variable names are defined in rpmlib.h. Return Value of RPM Variable -- rpmGetVar()
#include char *rpmGetVar(int var); xxx

is the name of

This function returns the value of the variable specified in var. On error, the function returns
NULL.

Return Boolean Value Of RPM Variable -- rpmGetBooleanVar()
#include int rpmGetBooleanVar(int var);

This function looks up the variable specified in var and returns a 0 or 1 depending on the variable's value. On error, the function returns 0.


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

411

Set Value Of RPM Variable -- rpmSetVar()
#include void rpmSetVar(int var, char *val);

This function sets the variable specified in var to the value passed in val. It is also possible for val to be NULL.

21.2.4 rpmrc-Related Information
The functions in this section are all related to rpmrc information -- the rpmrc files as well as the variables set from those files. This information also includes the architecture and operating system information based on rpmrc file entries. Read rpmrc Files -- rpmReadConfigFiles()
#include int rpmReadConfigFiles(char * file, char * arch, char * os, int building);

This function reads rpmrc files according to the following rules: · · · Always read /usr/lib/rpmrc. If file is specified, read it. If file is not specified, read /etc/rpmrc and ~/.rpmrc.

Every rpmrc file entry is used with rpmSetVar() to set the appropriate RPM variable. Part of the normal rpmrc file processing also includes setting the architecture and operating system variables for the system executing this function. These default settings can be overridden by entering architecture and/or operating system information in arch and os, respectively. This information will still go through the normal rpmrc translation process.


412

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

The building argument should be set to 1 only if a package is being built when this function is called. Since most rpmlib-based applications will probably not duplicate RPM's package building capabilities, building should normally be set to 0. Return Operating System Name -- rpmGetOsName()
#include char *rpmGetOsName(void);

This function returns the name of the operating system, as determined by rpmlib's normal rpmrc file processing. Return Architecture Name -- rpmGetArchName()
#include char *rpmGetArchName(void);

This function returns the name of the architecture, as determined by rpmlib's normal rpmrc file processing. Print all rpmrc-Derived Variables -- rpmShowRC()
#include int rpmShowRC(FILE *f);

This function writes all variable names and their values to the file f. Always returns 0. Return Architecture Compatibility Score -- rpmArchScore()
#include int rpmArchScore(char * arch);

This function returns the "distance" between the architecture whose name is specified in arch, and the current architecture. Returns 0 if the two architectures are incompatible. The smaller the number returned, the more compatible the two architectures are.


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

413

Return Operating System Compatibility Score -- rpmOsScore()
#include int rpmOsScore(char * os);

This function returns the "distance" between the operating system whose name is specified in os, and the current operating system. Returns 0 if the two operating systems are incompatible. The smaller the number returned, the more compatible the two operating systems are.

21.2.5 RPM Database Manipulation
The functions in this section perform the basic operations on the RPM database. This includes opening and closing the database, as well as creating the database. A function also exists to rebuild a database that has been corrupted.
mdb

Every function that accesses the RPM database in some fashion makes use of the rpstructure. This structure is used as a handle to refer to a particular RPM database.
#include int rpmdbOpen(char * root, rpmdb * dbp, int mode, int perms);

Open RPM Database -- rpmdbOpen()

This function opens the RPM database located in RPMVAR_DBPATH, returning the rpmdb structure dbp. If root is specified, it is prepended to RPMVAR_DBPATH prior to opening. The mode and perms parameters are identical to open(2)'s flags and mode parameters, respectively. The function returns 1 on error, 0 on success. Close RPM Database -- rpmdbClose()
#include void rpmdbClose(rpmdb db);


414

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

This function closes the RPM database specified by the structure is also freed. Create RPM Database -- rpmdbInit()
#include int rpmdbInit(char * root, int perms);

rpmdb

structure db. The db

This function creates a new RPM database to be located in RPMVAR_DBPATH. If the database already exists, it is left unchanged. If root is specified, it is prepended to RPMVAR_DBPATH prior to creation. The perms parameter is identical to open(2)'s mode parameter. The function returns 1 on error, 0 on success. Rebuild RPM Database -- rpmdbRebuild()
#include int rpmdbRebuild(char * root);

This function rebuilds the RPM database located in RPMVAR_DBPATH. If root is specified, it is prepended to RPMVAR_DBPATH prior to rebuilding. The function returns 1 on error, 0 on success.

21.2.6 RPM Database Traversal
The following functions are used to traverse the RPM database. Also described in this section is a function to retrieve a database record by its record number. It should be noted that database records are returned in the form of a Header structure. This data structure is widely used throughout rpmlib. We will discuss more header-related functions in Section 21.2.13, Header Manipulation and Section 21.2.14, Header Entry Manipulation. Begin RPM Database Traversal -- rpmdbFirstRecNum()
#include


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

415

unsigned int rpmdbFirstRecNum(rpmdb db);

This function returns the record number of the first record in the database specified by db. On error, it returns 0. Traverse To Next RPM Database Record -- rpmdbNextRecNum()
#include unsigned int rpmdbNextRecNum(rpmdb db, unsigned int lastOffset);

This function returns the record number of the record following the record number passed in lastOffset, in the database specified by db. On error, this function returns 0. Return Record From RPM Database -- rpmdbGetRecord()
#include Header rpmdbGetRecord(rpmdb db, unsigned int offset);

This function returns the record at the record number specified by offset from the database specified by db. This function returns
NULL

on error.

21.2.7 RPM Database Search
The functions in this section search the various parts of the RPM database. They all return a structure of type dbiIndexSet, which contains the records that match the search term. Here is the definition of the structure, as found in :
typedef struct { dbiIndexRecord * recs; int count; } dbiIndexSet;


416

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

Each

dbiIndexRecord

is also defined in as follows:

typedef struct { unsigned int recOffset; unsigned int fileNumber; } dbiIndexRecord;

The

recOffset element fileNumber element is

is the offset of the record from the start of the database file. The only used by rpmdbFindByFile().

Keep in mind that the rpmdbFindxxx search functions each return dbiIndexSet structures, which must be freed with dbiFreeIndexRecord() when no longer needed. Free Database Index -- dbiFreeIndexRecord()
#include #include void dbiFreeIndexRecord(dbiIndexSet set);

This function frees the database index set specified by set. Search RPM Database By File -- rpmdbFindByFile()
#include #include int rpmdbFindByFile(rpmdb db, char * filespec, dbiIndexSet * matches);

This function searches the RPM database specified by db for the package which owns the file specified by filespec. It returns matching records in matches. This function returns the following status values: · · ·
-1 0 1

-- An error occurred reading a database record. -- The search completed normally. -- The search term was not found.


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

417

Search RPM Database By Group -- rpmdbFindByGroup()
#include #include int rpmdbFindByGroup(rpmdb db, char * group, dbiIndexSet * matches);

This function searches the RPM database specified by db for the packages which are members of the group specified by group. It returns matching records in matches. This function returns the following status values: · · ·
-1 0 1

-- An error occurred reading a database record. -- The search completed normally. -- The search term was not found.

Search RPM Database By Package -- rpmdbFindPackage()
#include #include int rpmdbFindPackage(rpmdb db, char * name, dbiIndexSet * matches);

This function searches the RPM database specified by db for the packages with the package name (not label) specified by name. It returns matching records in matches. This function returns the following status values: · · ·
-1 0 1

-- An error occurred reading a database record. -- The search completed normally. -- The search term was not found.


418

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

Search RPM Database By Provides -- rpmdbFindByProvides()
#include #include int rpmdbFindByProvides(rpmdb db, char * provides, dbiIndexSet * matches);

This function searches the RPM database specified by db for the packages which provide the provides information specified by provides. It returns matching records in matches. This function returns the following status values: · · ·
-1 0 1

-- An error occurred reading a database record. -- The search completed normally. -- The search term was not found.

Search RPM Database By Requires -- rpmdbFindByRequiredBy()
#include #include int rpmdbFindByRequiredBy(rpmdb db, char * requires, dbiIndexSet * matches);

This function searches the RPM database specified by db for the packages which require the requires information specified by requires. It returns matching records in matches. This function returns the following status values: · · ·
-1 0 1

-- An error occurred reading a database record. -- The search completed normally. -- The search term was not found.


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

419

Search RPM Database By Conflicts -- rpmdbFindByConflicts()
#include #include int rpmdbFindByConflicts(rpmdb db, char * conflicts, dbiIndexSet * matches);

This function searches the RPM database specified by db for the packages which conflict with the conflicts information specified by conflicts. It returns matching records in matches. This function returns the following status values: · · ·
-1 0 1

-- An error occurred reading a database record. -- The search completed normally. -- The search term was not found.

21.2.8 Package Manipulation
These functions perform the operations most RPM users are familiar with. Functions that install and erase packages are here, along with a few related lower-level support functions. Install Source Package File -- rpmInstallSourcePackage()
#include int rpmInstallSourcePackage(char * root, int fd, char ** specFile, rpmNotifyFunction notify, char * labelFormat);

This function installs the source package file specified by fd. If root is not NULL, it is prepended to the variables RPMVAR_SOURCEDIR and RPMVAR_SPECDIR prior to the


420

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

actual installation. If specFile is not just-installed spec file is returned.

NULL,

the complete path and filename of the

The notify parameter is used to specify a progress-tracking function that will be called during the installation. Please refer to Track Package Installation Progress -- rpmNotifyFunction() in Section 21.2.8 for more information on this parameter. The labelFormat parameter can be used to specify how the package label should be formatted. It is used when printing the package label once the package install is ready to proceed. If labelformat is NULL, the package label is not printed. This function returns the following status values: · · ·
0 1 2

-- The source package was installed successfully. -- The source package file contained incorrect magic numbers. -- Another type of error occurred.

Install Binary Package File -- rpmInstallPackage()
#include int rpmInstallPackage(char * rootdir, rpmdb db, int fd, char * prefix, int flags, rpmNotifyFunction notify, char * labelFormat, char * netsharedPath);

This function installs the binary package specified by fd. If a path is specified in rootdir, the package will be installed with that path acting as the root directory. If a path is specified in prefix, it will be used as the prefix for relocatable packages. The RPM database specified by db is updated to reflect the newly installed package. The flags parameter is used to control the installation behavior. The flags are defined in rpmlib.h and take the form RPMINSTALL_xxx, where xxx is the name of the flag. The following flags are currently defined:


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

421

· · · · · · · · ·

RPMINSTALL_REPLACEPKG

-- Install the package even if it is already installed. -- Install the package even if it will replace files

RPMINSTALL_REPLACEFILES

owned by another package.
RPMINSTALL_TEST

-- Perform all install-time checks, but do not actually install -- Install the package, and remove all older versions of

the package.
RPMINSTALL_UPGRADE

the package.
RPMINSTALL_UPGRADETOOLD -- Install the package, even if the package is an older version of an already-installed package. RPMINSTALL_NODOCS

-- Do not install the package's documentation files.

-- Do not execute the package's install- and erase-time (in the case of an upgrade) scripts.
RPMINSTALL_NOSCRIPTS RPMINSTALL_NOARCH RPMINSTALL_NOOS

-- Do not perform architecture compatibility tests.

-- Do not perform operating system compatibility tests.

The notify parameter is used to specify a progress tracking function that will be called during the installation. Please refer to Track Package Installation Progress -- rpmNotifyFunction() in Section 21.2.8 for more information on this parameter. The labelFormat parameter can be used to specify how the package label should be formatted. This information is used when printing the package label once the package install is ready to proceed. It is used when printing the package label once the package install is ready to proceed. If labelformat is NULL, the package label is not printed. The netsharedPath parameter is used to specify that part of the local filesystem that is shared with other systems. If there is more than one path that is shared, the paths should be separated with a colon. This function returns the following status values: · · ·
0 1 2

-- The binary package was installed successfully. -- The binary package file contained incorrect magic numbers. -- Another type of error occurred.


422

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

Track Package Installation Progress -- rpmNotifyFunction()
#include typedef void (*rpmNotifyFunction)(const unsigned long amount, const unsigned long total);

A function can be passed to rpmIstallSourcePackage or rpmInstallPackage via the notify parameter. The function will be called at regular intervals during the installation, and will have two parameters passed to it: 1. 2. amount -- The number of bytes of the install that have been completed so far. total -- The total number of bytes that will be installed.

This function permits the creation of a dynamically updating progress meter during package installation. Remove Installed Package -- rpmRemovePackage()
#include int rpmRemovePackage(char * root, rpmdb db, unsigned int offset, int flags);

This function removes the package at record number offset in the RPM database specified by db. If root is specified, it is used as the path to a directory that will serve as the root directory while the package is being removed. The flags parameter is used to control the package removal behavior. The flags that may be passed are defined in rpmlib.h, and are of the form RPMUNINSTALL_xxx, where xxx is the name of the flag. The following flags are currently defined: ·
RPMUNINSTALL_TEST

-- Perform all erase-time checks, but do not actually remove

the package.


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

423

·

RPMUNINSTALL_NOSCRIPTS

-- Do not execute the package's erase-time scripts.

This function returns the following status values: · ·
0 1

-- The package was removed successfully. -- The package removal failed.

21.2.9 Package And File Verification
The functions in this section perform the verification operations necessary to ensure that the files comprising a package have not been modified since they were installed. Verification takes place on three distinct levels: 1. 2. 3. On the file-by-file level. On a package-wide level, through the use of the %verifyscript verification script. On an inter-package level, through RPM's normal dependency processing.

Because of this, there are two functions to perform each specific verification operation. Verify File -- rpmVerifyFile()
#include #include int rpmVerifyFile(char * root, Header h, int filenum, int * result);

This function verifies the filenum'th file from the package whose header is h. If root is specified, it is used as the path to a directory that will serve as the root directory while the file is being verified. The results of the file verification are returned in result, and consist of a number of flags. Each flag that is set indicates a verification failure.


424

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

The flags are defined in rpmlib.h, and are of the form is the name of the data that failed verification. This function returns 0 on success, and 1 on failure.

RPMVERIFY_xxx,

where

xxx

Execute Package's %verifyscript Verification Script -- rpmVerifyScript()
#include #include int rpmVerifyScript(char * root, Header h, int err);

This function executes the %verifyscript verification script for the package whose header is h. err must contain a valid file descriptor. If rpmIsVerbose() returns true, the %verifyscript verification script will direct all status messages to err. This function returns 0 on success, 1 on failure.

21.2.10 Dependency-Related Operations
The functions in this section are used to perform the various dependency-related operations supported by rpmlib. Dependency processing is entirely separate from normal package-based operations. The package installation and removal functions do not perform any dependency processing themselves. Therefore, dependency processing is somewhat different from other aspects of rpmlib's operation. Dependency processing centers around the rpmDependencies data structure. The operations that are to be performed against the RPM database (adding, removing, and upgrading packages) are performed against this data structure, using functions that are described below. These functions simply populate the data structure according to the operation being performed. They do not perform the actual operation on the package. This is an important point to keep in mind.


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

425

Once the data structure has been completely populated, a dependency check function is called to determine if there are any dependency-related problems. The result is a structure of dependency conflicts. This structure, rpmDependencyConflict, is defined in rpmlib.h. Note that it is necessary to free both the conflicts structure and the rpmDependencies structure when they are no longer needed. However, free() should not be used -- special functions for this are provided, and will be discussed in this section. Create a New Dependency Data Structure -- rpmdepDependencies()
#include rpmDependencies rpmdepDependencies(rpmdb db);

This function returns an initialized rpmDependencies structure. The dependency checking to be done will be based on the RPM database specified in the db parameter. If this parameter is NULL, the dependency checking will be done as if an empty RPM database was being used. Add a Package Install To the Dependency Data Structure -- rpmdepAddPackage()
#include #include void rpmdepAddPackage(rpmDependencies rpmdep, Header h);

dencies

This function adds the installation of the package whose header is h, to the data structure, rpmdep.

rpmDepen-

Add a Package Upgrade To the Dependency Data Structure -- rpmdepUpgradePackage()
#include #include void rpmdepUpgradePackage(rpmDependencies rpmdep, Header h);


426

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

This function adds the upgrading of the package whose header is h, to the rpmDependencies data structure, rpmdep. It is similar to rpmdepAddPackage(), but older versions of the package are removed. Add a Package Removal To the Dependency Data Structure -- rpmdepRemovePackage()
#include void rpmdepRemovePackage(rpmDependencies rpmdep, int dboffset);

This function adds the removal of the package whose RPM database offset is dboffset, to the rpmDependencies data structure, rpmdep. Add an Available Package To the Dependency Data Structure -- rpmdepAvailablePackage()
#include #include void rpmdepAvailablePackage(rpmDependencies rpmdep, Header h, void * key);

This function adds the package whose header is h, to the rpmdep.

rpmDependencies

structure,

The key parameter can be anything that uniquely identifies the package being added. It will be returned as part of the rpmDependencyConflict structure returned by rpmdepCheck(), specifically in that structure's suggestedPackage element. Perform a Dependency Check -- rpmdepCheck()
#include int rpmdepCheck(rpmDependencies rpmdep, struct rpmDependencyConflict ** conflicts, int * numConflicts);


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

427

This function performs a dependency check on the rpmDependencies structure rpmdep. It returns an array of size numConflicts, pointed to by conflicts. This function returns 0 on success, and 1 on error. Free Results of rpmdepCheck() -- rpmdepFreeConflicts()
#include void rpmdepFreeConflicts(struct rpmDependencyConflict * conflicts, int numConflicts);

This function frees the dependency conflict information of size numConflicts pointed to by conflicts. Free a Dependency Data Structure -- rpmdepDone()
#include void rpmdepDone(rpmDependencies rpmdep);

This function frees the

rpmDependencies

structure pointed to by rpmdep.

21.2.11 Diagnostic Output Control
The functions in this section are used to control the amount of diagnostic output produced by other rpmlib functions. The rpmlib library can produce a wealth of diagnostic output, making it easy to see what is going on at any given time. There are several different verbosity levels defined in rpmlib.h. Their symbolic names are of the form RPMMESS_xxx, where xxx is the name of the verbosity level. It should be noted that the numeric values of the verbosity levels increase with a decrease in verbosity. Unless otherwise set, the default verbosity level is
#include void rpmIncreaseVerbosity(void); RPMMESS_NORMAL.

Increase Verbosity Level -- rpmIncreaseVerbosity()


428

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

This function is used to increase the current verbosity level by one. Set Verbosity Level -- rpmSetVerbosity()
#include void rpmSetVerbosity(int level);

This function is used to set the current verbosity level to level. Note that no range checking is done to level. Return Verbosity Level -- rpmGetVerbosity()
#include int rpmGetVerbosity(void);

This function returns the current verbosity level. Check Verbosity Level -- rpmIsVerbose()
#include int rpmIsVerbose(void);

This function checks the current verbosity level and returns 1 if the current level is set to RPMMESS_VERBOSE or a level of higher verbosity. Otherwise, it returns 0. Check Debug Level -- rpmIsDebug()
#include int rpmIsDebug(void);

This function checks the current verbosity level and returns 1 if the current level is set to RPMMESS_DEBUG, or a level of higher verbosity. Otherwise, it returns 0.

21.2.12 Signature Verification
The functions in this section deal with the verification of package signatures. A package file may contain more than one type of signature. For example, a package may


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

429

contain a signature that contains the package's size, as well as a signature that contains cryptographically-derived data that can be used to prove the package's origin. Each type of signature has its own tag value. These tag values are defined in rpmlib.h and are of the form RPMSIGTAG_xxx, where xxx is the type of signature. Verify A Package File's Signature -- rpmVerifySignature()
#include int rpmVerifySignature(char *file, int_32 sigTag, void *sig, int count, char *result);

This function verifies the signature of the package pointed to by file. The result of the verification is stored in result, in a format suitable for printing. The sigTag parameter specifies the type of signature to be checked. The sig parameter specifies the signature against which the package is to be verified. The count parameter specifies the size of the signature; at present, this parameter is only used for PGP-based signatures. This function returns the following values: · · · ·
RPMSIG_OK

-- The signature verified correctly. -- The signature type is unknown. -- The signature did not verify correctly. -- The key required to check this signature is not available.

RPMSIG_UNKNOWN RPMSIG_BAD

RPMSIG_NOKEY

Free Signature Read By rpmReadPackageInfo() -- rpmFreeSignature()
#include #include void rpmFreeSignature(Header h);


430

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

This function frees the signature h.

21.2.13 Header Manipulation
The header is one of the key data structures in rpmlib. The functions in this section perform basic manipulations of the header. The header is actually a data structure. It is not necessary to fully understand the actual data structure. However, it is necessary to understand the basic concepts on which the header is based. The header serves as a kind of miniature database. The header can be searched for specific information, which can be retrieved easily. Like a database, the information contained in the header can be of varying sizes. Read A Header -- headerRead()
#include #include Header headerRead(int fd, int magicp);

This function reads a header from file fd, converting it from network byte order to the host system's byte order. If magicp is defined to be HEADER_MAGIC_YES, headerRead() will expect header magic numbers, and will return an error if they are not present. Likewise, if magicp is defined to be HEADER_MAGIC_NO, headerRead() will not check the header's magic numbers, and will return an error if they are present. On error, this function returns
NULL.

Write A Header -- headerWrite()
#include #include void headerWrite(int fd, Header h, int magicp);


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

431

This function writes the header h, to file fd, converting it from host byte order to network byte order. If magicp is defined to be HEADER_MAGIC_YES, headerWrite() will add the appropriate magic numbers to the header being written. If magicp is defined to be HEADER_MAGIC_NO, headerWrite() will not include magic numbers. Copy A Header -- headerCopy()
#include #include Header headerCopy(Header h);

This function returns a copy of header h. Calculate A Header's Size -- headerSizeof()
#include #include unsigned int headerSizeof(Header h, int magicp);

This function returns the number of bytes the header h takes up on disk. Note that in versions of RPM prior to 2.3.3, this function also changes the location of the data in the header. The result is that pointers from headerGetEntry() will no longer be valid. Therefore, any pointers acquired before calling headerSizeof() should be discarded. Create A New Header -- headerNew()
#include #include Header headerNew(void);

This function returns a new header. Deallocate A Header -- headerFree()
#include #include


432

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

void headerFree(Header h);

This function deallocates the header specified by h. Print Header Structure In Human-Readable Form -- headerDump()
#include #include void headerDump(Header h, FILE *f, int flags);

This function prints the structure of the header h, to the file f. If the flags parameter is defined to be HEADER_DUMP_INLINE, the header's data is also printed.

21.2.14 Header Entry Manipulation
The functions in this section provide the basic operations necessary to manipulate header entries. The following header entry types are currently defined: · · · · · · · · ·
RPM_NULL_TYPE RPM_CHAR_TYPE RPM_INT8_TYPE

-- This type is not used. -- The entry contains a single character. -- The entry contains a sixteen-bit integer. -- The entry contains a thirty-two-bit integer. -- The entry contains a sixty-four-bit integer. -- The entry contains a null-terminated character string.

-- The entry contains an eight-bit integer.

RPM_INT16_TYPE RPM_INT32_TYPE RPM_INT64_TYPE

RPM_STRING_TYPE RPM_BIN_TYPE

-- The entry contains binary data that will not be interpreted by -- The entry contains an array of null-terminated

rpmlib.
RPM_STRING_ARRAY_TYPE

strings. Get Entry From Header -- headerGetEntry()
#include


Section 21.2:rpmlib Functions

433

#include int headerGetEntry(Header h, int_32 tag, int_32 *type, void **p, int_32 *c);

This function retrieves the entry matching tag from header h. The type of the entry is returned in type, a pointer to the data is returned in p, and the size of the data is returned in c. Both type and c may be null, in which case that data will not be returned. Note that if the entry type is RPM_STRING_ARRAY_TYPE, you must issue a free() on p when done with the data. This function returns 1 on sucess, and 0 on failure. Add Entry To Header -- headerAddEntry()
#include #include int headerAddEntry(Header h, int_32 tag, int_32 type, void *p, int_32 c);

This function adds a new entry to the header h. The entry's tag is specified by the tag parameter, and the entry's type is specified by the type parameter. The entry's data is pointed to by p, and the size of the data is specified by c. This function always returns 1. Note: In versions of RPM prior to 2.3.3, headerAddEntry() will only work successfully with headers produced by headerCopy() and headerNew(). In particular, headerAddEntry() is not supported when used to add entries to a header produced by headerRead(). Later versions of RPM lift this restriction. Determine If Entry Is In Header -- headerIsEntry()
#include


434

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

#include int headerIsEntry(Header h, int_32 tag);

This function returns 1 if an entry with tag tag is present in header h. If the tag is not present, this function returns 0.

21.2.15 Header Iterator Support
Iterators are used as a means to step from entry to entry, through an entire header. The functions in this section are used to create, use, and free iterators. Create an Iterator -- headerInitIterator()
#include #include HeaderIterator headerInitIterator(Header h);

This function returns a newly-created iterator for the header h. Step To the Next Entry -- headerNextIterator()
#include #include int headerNextIterator(HeaderIterator iter, int_32 *tag, int_32 *type, void **p, int_32 *c);

This function steps to the next entry in the header specified when the iterator iter was created with headerInitIterator(). The next entry's tag, type, data, and size are returned in tag, type, p, and c, respectively. Note that if the entry type is RPM_STRING_ARRAY_TYPE, you must issue a free() on p when done with the data. This function returns 1 if successful, and 0 if there are no more entries in the header.


Section 21.3:Example Code

435

Free An Iterator -- headerFreeIterator()
#include #include void headerFreeIterator(HeaderIterator iter);

This function frees the resources used by the iterator iter.

21.3 Example Code
In this section, we'll study example programs that make use of rpmlib to perform an assortment of commonly-required operations.

21.3.1 Example #1
In this example, we'll use a number of rpmlib's header manipulation functions.
#include #include #include #include #include

#include

Here we've included rpmlib.h, which is necessary for all programs that use rpmlib.
void main(int argc, char ** argv) { HeaderIterator iter; Header h, sig; int_32 itertag, type, count; void **p = NULL; char *blather; char * name; int fd, stat;

Here we've defined the program's storage. Note in particular the and int_32 datatypes.

HeaderIterator, Header,


436

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

if (argc == 1) { fd = 0; } else { fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY, 0644); } if (fd < 0) { perror("open"); exit(1); }

Standard stuff here. The first argument is supposed to be an RPM package file. It is opened here. If there is no argument on the command line, the program will use stdin instead.
stat = rpmReadPackageInfo(fd, &sig, &h); if (stat) { fprintf(stderr, "rpmReadPackageInfo error status: %d\n%s\n", stat, strerror(errno)); exit(stat); }

Here things start to get interesting! The signature and headers are read from package file that was just opened. If you noticed above, we've defined sig and h to be of type Header. That means we can use rpmlib's header-related functions on them. After a little bit of error checking, and it's time to move on...
headerGetEntry(h, RPMTAG_NAME, &type, (void **) &name, &count); if (headerIsEntry(h, RPMTAG_PREIN)) { printf("There is a preinstall script for %s\n", name); } if (headerIsEntry(h, RPMTAG_POSTIN)) { printf("There is a postinstall script for %s\n", name); }

Now that we have the package's header, we get the package name (specified by the RPMTAG_NAME above). Next, we see if the package has pre-install (RPMTAG_PREIN) or


Section 21.3:Example Code

437

post-install (RPMTAG_POSTIN) scripts. If there are, we print out a message, along with the package name.
printf("Dumping signatures...\n"); headerDump(sig, stdout, 1); rpmFreeSignature(sig);

Turning to the other Header structure we've read, we print out the package's signatures in human-readable form. When we're done, we free the block of signatures.
printf("Iterating through the header...\n"); iter = headerInitIterator(h);

Here we set up an iterator for the package's header. This will allow us to step through each entry in the header.
while (headerNextIterator(iter, &itertag, &type, p, &count)) { switch (itertag) { case RPMTAG_SUMMARY: blather = *p; printf("The Summary: %s\n", blather); break; case RPMTAG_FILENAMES: printf("There are %d files in this package\n", count); break; }

This loop uses headerNextIterator() to return each entry's tag, type, data, and size. By using a switch statement on the tag, we can perform different operations on each type of entry in the header.
} headerFreeIterator(iter); headerFree(h); }


438

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

This is the housecleaning section of the program. First we free the iterator that we've been using, and finally the header itself. Running this program on a package gives us the following output:
# ./dump amanda-client-2.3.0-2.i386.rpm There is a postinstall script for amanda-client Dumping signatures... Entry count: 2 Data count : 20 CT TAG TYPE : 000 (1000)NAME INT32_TYPE Data: 000 0x00029f5d (171869) Entry : 001 (1003)SERIAL BIN_TYPE Data: 000 27 01 f9 97 d8 2c 36 40 Data: 008 c6 4a 91 45 32 13 d1 62 Iterating through the header... The Summary: Client-side Amanda package There are 11 files in this package # Entry OFSET COUNT 0x00000000 00000001 0x00000004 00000016

21.3.2 Example #2
This example delves a bit more into the database-related side of rpmlib. After initializing rpmlib's variables by reading the appropriate rpmrc files, the code traverses the database records, looking for a specific package. That package's header is then dumped in its entirety.
#include #include #include #include #include #include

#include

As before, this is the normal way of including all of rpmlib's definitions.
void main(int argc, char ** argv)


Section 21.3:Example Code

439

{ Header h; int offset; int dspBlockNum = 0; int blockNum = 0; int_32 type, count; char * name; rpmdb db;

/* default to all */

Here are the data declarations. Note the declaration of db: this is how we will be accessing the RPM database.
printf("The database path is: %s\n", rpmGetVar(RPMVAR_DBPATH) ? rpmGetVar(RPM_DBPATH) : "(none)"); rpmReadConfigFiles(NULL, NULL, NULL, 0); printf("The database path is: %s\n", rpmGetVar(RPMVAR_DBPATH) ? rpmGetVar(RPM_DBPATH) : "(none)");

Before opening the RPM database, it's necessary to know where the database resides. This information is stored in rpmrc files, which are read by rpmReadConfigFiles(). To show that this function is really doing its job, we retrieve the RPM database path before and after the rpmrc files are read. Note that we test the return value of rpmGetVar(RPM_DBPATH) and, if it is null, we insert (none) in the printf() output. This prevents possible core dumps if no database path has been set, and besides, it's more user-friendly.
if (rpmdbOpen("", &db, O_RDONLY, 0644) != 0) { fprintf(stderr, "cannot open /var/lib/rpm/packages.rpm\n"); exit(1); }

Here we're opening the RPM database, and doing some cursory error checking to make sure we should continue.
offset = rpmdbFirstRecNum(db);


440

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

We get the offset of the first database record...
while (offset) { h = rpmdbGetRecord(db, offset); if (!h) { fprintf(stderr, "headerRead failed\n"); exit(1); }

Here we start a while loop based on the record offset. As long as there is a non-zero offset (meaning that there is still an available record), we get the record. If there's a problem getting the record, we exit.
headerGetEntry(h, RPMTAG_NAME, &type, (void **) &name, &count); if (strcmp(name, argv[1]) == 0) headerDump(h, stdout, 1);

Next, we get the package name entry from the record, and compare it with the name of the package we're interested in. If it matches, we dump the contents of the entire record.
headerFree(h); offset = rpmdbNextRecNum(db, offset); }

At the end of the loop, we free the record, and get the offset to the next record.
rpmdbClose(db); }

At the end, we close the database, and exit. Here's the program's output, edited for brevity. Notice that the database path changes from (null) to /var/lib/rpm after the rpmrc files are read.
# ./showdb amanda-client The database path is: (null)


Section 21.3:Example Code

441

The database path is: /var/lib/rpm Entry count: 37 Data count : 5219 CT 000 000 001 000 002 000 003 000 004 017 000 001 002 003 004 005 006 034 000 001 002 003 004 005 TAG (1000)NAME amanda-client (1001)VERSION 2.3.0 (1002)RELEASE 7 (1004)SUMMARY Client-side Amanda (1005)DESCRIPTION TYPE STRING_TYPE STRING_TYPE STRING_TYPE STRING_TYPE package STRING_TYPE OFSET COUNT 0x00000000 00000001 0x0000000e 00000001 0x00000014 00000001 0x00000016 00000001 0x00000031 00000001

Entry Entry Entry Entry Entry ... Entry

: Data: : Data: : Data: : Data: : : Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: : Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data:

(1027)FILENAMES STRING_ARRAY_TYPE 0x00000df3 00000015 /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-7 /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-7/COPYRIGHT /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-7/INSTALL /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-7/README /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-7/SYSTEM.NOTES /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-7/WHATS.NEW /usr/doc/amanda-client-2.3.0-7/amanda-client.README (1049)REQUIRENAME STRING_ARRAY_TYPE libc.so.5 libdb.so.2 grep sed NetKit-B dump 0x0000141c 00000006

... Entry

... #

As can be seen, everything that you could possibly want to know about an installed package is available using this method.

21.3.3 Example #3
This example is similar in function to the previous one, except that it uses rpmlib's search functions to find the desired package record:
#include


442

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

#include #include #include #include #include



#include

Here we include rpmlib's definitions.
void main(int argc, char ** argv) { Header h; int stat; rpmdb db; dbiIndexSet matches;

Here are the storage declarations.
if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "showdb2 \n"); exit(1); } rpmReadConfigFiles(NULL, NULL, NULL, 0); if (rpmdbOpen("", &db, O_RDONLY, 0644) != 0) { fprintf(stderr, "cannot open /var/lib/rpm/packages.rpm\n"); exit(1); }

In this section, we do some argument processing, processing the rpmrc files, and open the RPM database.
stat = rpmdbFindPackage(db, argv[1], &matches); printf("Status is: %d\n", stat); if (stat == 0) { if (matches.count) { printf("Number of matches: %d\n", matches.count); h = rpmdbGetRecord(db, matches.recs[0].recOffset); if (h) headerDump(h, stdout, 1); headerFree(h);


Section 21.3:Example Code

443

dbiFreeIndexRecord(matches); } }

In this section we use rpmdbFindPackage() to search for the desired package. After checking for successful status, the count of matching package records is checked. If there is at least one match, the first matching record is retrieved, and dumped. Note that there could be more than one match. Although this example doesn't dump more than the first matching record, it would be simple to access all matches by stepping through the matches.recs array. Once we're done with the record, we free it, as well as the list of matching records.
rpmdbClose(db); }

The last thing we do before exiting is to close the database. Here's some sample output from the program. Note the successful status, and the number of matches printed before the dump:
# ./showdb2 rpm Status is: 0 Number of matches: 1 Entry count: 37 Data count : 2920 CT 000 000 001 000 002 000 003 000 034 000 001 002 035 TAG TYPE (1000)NAME STRING_TYPE rpm (1001)VERSION STRING_TYPE 2.2.9 (1002)RELEASE STRING_TYPE 1 (1004)SUMMARY STRING_TYPE Red Hat Package Manager OFSET COUNT 0x00000000 00000001 0x00000004 00000001 0x0000000a 00000001 0x0000000c 00000001

Entry Entry Entry Entry ... Entry

: Data: : Data: : Data: : Data: : Data: Data: Data: :

Entry

(1049)REQUIRENAME STRING_ARRAY_TYPE 0x00000b40 00000003 libz.so.1 libdb.so.2 libc.so.5 (1050)REQUIREVERSION STRING_ARRAY_TYPE 0x00000b5f 00000003


444

Chapter 21:A Guide to the RPM Library API

Entry #

Data: Data: Data: : Data:

000 001 002 036 (1064)RPMVERSION 000 2.2.9

STRING_TYPE

0x00000b62 00000001


Part III

Appendixes



Section A.1:RPM File Naming Convention

447

A

Format of the RPM File

A.1 RPM File Naming Convention
While RPM will run just as well if a package file has been renamed, when the packages are created during RPM's build process, they follow a specific naming convention. The convention is:
name-version-release.architecture.rpm

where: · · · ·
name

is a name describing the packaged software. is the version of the packaged software. is the number of times this version of the software has been packaged.

version release

architecture is a shorthand name describing the type of computer hardware the packaged software is meant to run on. It may also be the string src, or nosrc. Both of these strings indicate the file is an RPM source package. The nosrc string means that the file contains only package building files, while the src string means the file contains the necessary package building files and the software's source code.

A few notes are in order. Normally, the package name is taken verbatim from the packaged software's name. Occasionally, this approach won't work -- usually this occurs when the software is split into multiple "subpackages," each supporting a different set of functions. An example of this situation would be the way ncurses was packaged on Red Hat Linux Linux. The package incorporating ncurses basic functionality was called ncurses, while the package incorporating those parts of ncurses' program development functionality was named ncurses-devel. The version number is normally taken verbatim from the package's version. The only restriction placed on the version is that it cannot contain a dash "-". The release can be thought of as the package's version. Traditionally it is a number, starting at 1, that shows how many times the packaged software, at a given version,


448

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

has been built. This is tradition and not a restriction, however. Like the version number, the only restriction is that dashes are not allowed. The architecture specifier is a string that indicates what hardware the package has been built for. There are a number of architectures defined: · · · · · · · i386 -- The Intel x86 family of microprocessors, starting with the 80386. alpha -- The Digital Alpha/AXP series of microprocessors. sparc -- Sun Microsystem's SPARC series of chips. mips -- MIPS Technologies' processors. ppc -- The Power PC microprocessor family. m68k -- Motorola's 68000 series of CISC microprocessors. SGI -- Equivalent to "MIPS".

This list will almost certainly change. For the most up-to-date list, please refer to the file /usr/lib/rpmrc. It contains information used internally by RPM, including a list of architectures and equivalent code numbers.

A.2 RPM File Format
While the following details concerning the actual format of an RPM package file were accurate at the time this was written, three points should be kept in mind: 1. 2. The file format is subject to change. If a package file is to be manipulated somehow, you are strongly urged to use the appropriate rpmlib routines to access the package file. Why? See point number 1! This appendix describes the most recent version of the RPM file format: version 3. The file(1) utility can be used to see a package's file format version.

3.

With those caveats out of the way, let's take a look inside an RPM file...

A.2.1 Parts of an RPM File
Every RPM package file can be divided into four distinct sections. They are:


Section A.2:RPM File Format

449

· · · ·

The lead. The signature. The header. The archive.

Package files are written to disk in network byte order. If required, RPM will automatically convert to host byte order when the package file is read. Let's take a look at each section, starting with the lead.

A.2.2 The Lead
The lead is the first part of an RPM package file. In previous versions of RPM, it was used to store information used internally by RPM. Today, however, the lead's sole purpose is to make it easy to identify an RPM package file. For example, the file(1) command uses the lead. 1All the information contained in the lead has been duplicated or superseded by information contained in the header. 2 RPM defines a C structure that describes the lead:
struct rpmlead { unsigned char magic[4]; unsigned char major, minor; short type; short archnum; char name[66]; short osnum; short signature_type; char reserved[16]; };

Let's take a look at an actual package file and examine the various pieces of data that make up the lead. In the following display, the number to the left of the colon is the byte offset, in hexadecimal, from the start of the file. The eight groups of four
1 Please refer to Section A.4, Identifying RPM files with the file(1) command for a discussion on identifying RPM package files with the file command. 2 The header is discussed in Section A.2.5, The Header.


450

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

characters show the hex value of the bytes in the file -- two bytes per group of four characters. Finally, the characters on the right show the ASCII values of the data bytes. When a data byte's value results in a non-printable character, a dot (".") is inserted instead. Here are the first thirty-two bytes of a package file -- in this case, the package file rpm-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm:
00000000: edab eedb 0300 0000 0001 7270 6d2d 322e 00000010: 322e 312d 3100 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ..........rpm-2. 2.1-1...........

The first four bytes (edab eedb) are the magic values that identify the file as an RPM package file. Both the file command and RPM use these magic numbers to determine whether a file is legitimate or not. The next two bytes (0300) indicate RPM file format version. In this case, the file's major version number is 3, and the minor version number is 0. Versions of RPM later than 2.1 create version 3.0 package files. The next two bytes (0000) determine what type of RPM file the file is. There are presently two types defined: · · Binary package file (type = 0000) Source package file (type = 0001)

In this case, the file is a binary package file. The next two bytes (0001) are used to store the architecture that the package was built for. In this case, the number 1 refers to the i386 architecture. 3In the case of a source package file, these two bytes should be ignored, as source packages are not built for a specific architecture. The next sixty-six bytes (starting with 7270 6d2d) contain the name of the package. The name must end with a null byte, which leaves sixty-five bytes for RPM's usual name-version-release-style name. In this case, we can read the name from the right side of the output:
rpm-2.2.1-1 3 It should be noted that the architecture used internally by RPM is actually stored in the header. This value is strictly for file(1)'s use.


Section A.2:RPM File Format

451

Since the name rpm-2.2.1-1 is shorter than the sixty-five bytes allocated for the name, the leftover bytes are filled with nulls. Skipping past the space allocated for the name, we see two bytes (0001):
00000040: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001 0005 00000050: 0400 0000 24e1 ffbf 6bb3 0008 00e6 ffbf ................ ....$...k.......

These bytes represent the operating system for which this package was built. In this case, 1 equals Linux. As with the architecture-to-number translations, the operating system and corresponding code numbers can be found in the file, /usr/lib/rpmrc. The next two bytes (0005) indicate the type of signature used in the file. A type 5 signature is new to version 3 RPM files. The signature appears next in the file, but we need to discuss an additional detail before exploring the signature.

A.2.3 Wanted: A New RPM Data Structure
By looking at the C structure that defines the lead, and matching it with the bytes in an actual package file, it's trivial to extract the data from the lead. From a programming standpoint, it's also easy to manipulate data in the lead -- It's simply a matter of using the element names from the structure. But there's a problem. And because of that problem the lead is no longer used internally by RPM. The lead: An Abandoned Data Structure What's the problem, and why is the lead no longer used by RPM? The answer to these questions is a single word: inflexibility. The technique of defining a C structure to access data in a file just isn't very flexible. Let's look at an example. Flip back to the lead's C structure in Section A.2.2, The Lead. Say, for example, that some software comes along, and it has a long name. A very long name. A name so long, in fact, that the 66 bytes defined in the structure element name just couldn't hold it.


452

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

What can we do? Well, we could certainly change the structure such that the name element would be 100 bytes long. But once a new version of RPM is created using this new structure, we have two problems: 1. 2. Any package file created with the new version of RPM wouldn't be able to read older package formats. Any older version of RPM would be unable to install packages created with the newer version of RPM.

Not a very good situation! Ideally, we would like to somehow eliminate the requirement that the format of the data written to a package file be engraved in granite. We should be able to do the following things, all without losing compatibility with existing versions of RPM. · · · Add extra data to the file format. Change the size of existing data. Reorder the data.

Sounds like a big problem, but there's a solution... Is There a Solution? The solution is to standardize the method by which information is retrieved from a file. This is done by creating a well-defined data structure that contains easily searched information about the data, and then physically separating that information from the data. When the data is required, it is found by using the easily searched information, which points to the data itself. The benefits are, that the data can be placed anywhere in the file, and that the format of the data itself can change. The Solution: The Header Structure The header structure is RPM's solution to the problem of easily manipulating information in a standard way. The header structure's sole purpose in life is to contain zero or more pieces of data. A file can have more than one header structure in it. In


Section A.2:RPM File Format

453

fact, an RPM package file has two -- the signature, and the header. It was from this header that the header structure got its name. There are three sections to each header structure. The first section is known as the header structure header. The header structure header is used to identify the start of a header structure, its size, and the number of data items it contains. Following the header structure header is an area called the index. The index contains one or more index entries. Each index entry contains information about, and a pointer to, a specific data item. After the index comes the store. It is in the store that the data items are kept. The data in the store is packed together as closely as possible. The order in which the data is stored is immaterial -- a far cry from the C structure used in the lead. The Header Structure in Depth Let's take a more in-depth look at the actual format of a header structure, starting with the header structure header:
The Header Structure Header

The header structure header always starts with a three-byte magic number: 8e ad e8. Following this is a one-byte version number. Next are four bytes that are reserved for future expansion. After the reserved bytes, there is a four-byte number that indicates how many index entries exist in this header structure, followed by another four-byte number indicating how many bytes of data are part of the header structure.
The Index Entry

The header structure's index is made up of zero or more index entries. Each entry is sixteen bytes longs. The first four bytes contain a tag -- a numeric value that identifies what type of data is pointed to by the entry. The tag values change according to the header structure's position in the RPM file. A list of the actual tag values, and what they represent, will be included later in this appendix. Following the tag, is a four-byte type, which is a numeric value that describes the format of the data pointed to by the entry. The types and their values do not change from header structure to header structure. Here is the current list: · NULL = 0


454

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

· · · · · · · ·

CHAR = 1 INT8 = 2 INT16 = 3 INT32 = 4 INT64 = 5 STRING = 6 BIN = 7 STRING_ARRAY = 8 need some clarification. The STRING data type is while the STRING_ARRAY is a collection of strings. collection of binary data. This is normally used to an INT, but not a printable STRING.

A few of the data types might simply a null-terminated string, Finally, the BIN data type is a identify data that is longer than

Next is a four-byte offset that contains the position of the data, relative to the beginning of the store. We'll talk about the store in just a moment. Finally, there is a four-byte count that contains the number of data items pointed to by the index entry. There are a few wrinkles to the meaning of the count, and they center around the STRING and STRING_ARRAY data types. STRING data always has a count of 1, while STRING_ARRAY data has a count equal to the number of strings contained in the store.
The Store

The store is where the data contained in the header structure is stored. Depending on the data type being stored, there are some details that should be kept in mind: · · For STRING data, each string is terminated with a null byte. For INT data, each integer is stored at the natural boundary for its type. A 64-bit INT is stored on an 8-byte boundary, a 16-bit INT is stored on a 2-byte boundary, and so on. All data is in network byte order.

·


Section A.2:RPM File Format

455

With all these details out of the way, let's take a look at the signature.

A.2.4 The Signature
The signature section follows the lead in the RPM package file. It contains information that can be used to verify the integrity, and optionally, the authenticity of the majority of the package file. The signature is implemented as a header structure. You probably noticed the word, "majority", above. The information in the signature header structure is based on the contents of the package file's header and archive only. The data in the lead and the signature header structure are not included when the signature information is created, nor are they part of any subsequent checks based on that information. While that omission might seem to be a weakness in RPM's design, it really isn't. In the case of the lead, since it is used only for easy identification of package files, any changes made to that part of the file would, at worst, leave the file in such a state that RPM wouldn't recognize it as a valid package file. Likewise, any changes to the signature header structure would make it impossible to verify the file's integrity, since the signature information would have been changed from their original values. Analyzing the Signature Area Using our new-found knowledge of header structures, let's take a look at the signatures in rpm-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm:
00000060: 8ead e801 0000 0000 0000 0003 0000 00ac ................

The first three bytes (8ead e8) contain the magic number for the start of the header structure. The next byte (01) is the header structure's version. As we discussed earlier, the next four bytes (0000 0000) are reserved. The four bytes after that (0000 0003) represent the number of index entries in the signature section, namely, three. Following that are four bytes (0000 00ac) that indicate how many bytes of data are stored in the signature. The hex value 00ac, when converted to decimal, means the store is 172 bytes long.


456

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

Following the first 16 bytes is the index. Each of the three index entries in this header structure consists of four 32-bit integers, in the following order: · · · · Tag Type Offset Count

Let's take a look at the first index entry:
00000070: 0000 03e8 0000 0004 0000 0000 0000 0001 ................

The tag consists of the first four bytes (0000 03e8), which is 1000 when translated from hex. Looking in the RPM source directory at the file lib/signature.h, we find the following tag definitions:
#define SIGTAG_SIZE #define SIGTAG_MD5 #define SIGTAG_PGP 1000 1001 1002

So the tag we are studying is for a size signature. Let's continue. The next four bytes (0000 0004) contain the data type. As we saw earlier, data type 4 means that the data stored for this index entry, is a 32-bit integer. Skipping the next four bytes for a moment, the last four bytes (0000 0001) are the number of 32-bit integers pointed to by this index entry. Now, let's go back to the four bytes prior to the count (0000 0000). This number is the offset, in bytes, at which the size signature is located. It has a value of zero, but the question is, zero bytes from what? The answer, although it doesn't do us much good, is that the offset is calculated from the start of the store. So first we must find where the store begins, and we can do that by performing a simple calculation. First, go back to the start of the signature section. (We've made a copy here so you won't need to flip from page to page)


Section A.2:RPM File Format

457

00000060: 8ead e801 0000 0000 0000 0003 0000 00ac ................

After the magic, the version, and the four reserved bytes, there is the number of index entries (0000 0003). Since we know that each index entry is sixteen bytes long (four for the tag, four for the type, four for the offset, and four for the count), we can multiply the number of entries (3) by the number of bytes in each entry (16), and obtain the total size of the index, which is 48 decimal, or 30 in hex. Since the first index entry starts at hex offset 70, we can simply add hex 30 to hex 70, and get, in hex, offset a0. So let's skip down to offset a0, and see what's there:
000000a0: 0004 4c4f b025 b097 1597 0132 df35 d169 ..LO.%.....2.5.i

If we've done our math correctly, the first four bytes (0004 4c4f) should represent the size of this file. Converting to decimal, this is 281,679. Let's take a look at the size of the actual file:
# ls -al rpm-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-1 ed # ed 282015 Jul 21 16:05 rpm-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm

Hmmm, something's not right. Or is it? It looks like we're short by 336 bytes, or in hex, 150. Interesting how that's a nice round hex number, isn't it? For now, let's continue through the remainder of the index entries, and see if hex 150 pops up elsewhere. Here's the next index entry. It has a tag of decimal 1001, which is an MD5 checksum. It is type 7, which is the BIN data type, it is 16 bytes long, and its data starts four bytes after the beginning of the store:
00000080: 0000 03e9 0000 0007 0000 0004 0000 0010 ................


458

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

And here's the data. It starts with b025 (Remember that offset of four!) and ends on the second line with 5375. This is a 128-bit MD5 checksum of the package file's header and archive sections.
000000a0: 0004 4c4f b025 b097 1597 0132 df35 d169 000000b0: 329c 5375 8900 9503 0500 31ed 6390 a520 ..LO.%.....2.5.i 2.Su......1.c..

Ok, let's jump back to the last index entry:
00000090: 0000 03ea 0000 0007 0000 0014 0000 0098 ................

It has a tag value of 03ea (1002 in decimal -- a PGP signature block) and is also a BIN data type. The data starts 20 decimal bytes from the start of the data area, which would put it at file offset b4 (in hex). It's a biggie -- 152 bytes long! Here's the data, starting with 8900:
000000b0: 000000c0: 000000d0: 000000e0: 000000f0: 00000100: 00000110: 00000120: 00000130: 00000140: 329c e8f1 3790 91b8 f041 3142 ee17 279f e8e3 5b65 5375 cba2 364e c150 ebc8 61b3 35e1 0306 5090 4de1 8900 9bf9 dfb0 704e d18a b1da d105 28ed 6260 b1d2 9503 0101 9a8a 2c64 01c9 8494 fb68 0ba0 0b3c c07f 0500 437b 22b5 d88a 3601 6bef 0ce6 0855 ba04 8afa 31ed 0400 b0b3 8fca 66f0 9c19 715a 9e82 69a9 4a9b 6390 9c8e dc30 18ab 9ddd 4574 60f1 2b1c 2573 0000 a520 0ad4 4c6f 5b6f e956 c49f c660 2ede 1bbb 0000 2.Su......1.c.. ........C{...... 7.6N...."....0Lo ...PpN,d......[o .A......6.f....V 1Ba.....k...Et.. ..5....h..qZ`..` '...(....U..+... ..P.b`.<..i.%s.. [eM.......J.....

It ends with the bytes 4a9b. This is a 1,216-bit PGP signature block. It is also the end of the signature section. There are four null bytes following the last data item in order to round the size out so that it ends on an 8-byte boundary. This means that the offset of the next section starts at offset 150, in hex. Say, wasn't the size in the size signature off by 150 hex? Yes, the size in the signature is the size of the file -- less the size of the lead and the signature sections.


Section A.2:RPM File Format

459

A.2.5 The Header
The header section contains all available information about the package. Entries such as the package's name, version, and file list, are contained in the header. Like the signature section, the header is in header structure format. Unlike the signature, which has only three possible tag types, the header has more than sixty different tags. The list of currently defined tags appears later in this appendix on Header Tag Listing in Section A.2.5. Be aware that the list of tags changes frequently -- the definitive list appears in the RPM sources in lib/rpmlib.h. Analyzing the Header The easiest way to find the start of the header is to look for the second header structure by scanning for its magic number (8ead e8). The sixteen bytes, starting with the magic, are the header structures's header. They follow the same format as the header in the signature's header structure:
00000150: 8ead e801 0000 0000 0000 0021 0000 09d3 ...........!....

As before, the byte following the magic identifies this header structure as being in version 1 format. Following the four reserved bytes, we find the count of entries stored in the header (0000 0021). Converting to decimal, we find that there are 33 entries in the header. The next four bytes (0000 09d3) converted to decimal, tell us that there are 2,515 bytes of data in the store. Since the header is a header structure just like the signature, we know that the next 16 bytes are the first index entry:
00000160: 0000 03e8 0000 0006 0000 0000 0000 0001 ................

The first four bytes (0000 03e8) are the tag, which is the tag for the package name. The next four bytes indicate the data is type 6, or a null-terminated string. There's an offset of zero in the next four bytes, meaning that the data for this tag is first in the store. Finally, the last four bytes (0000 0001) show that the data count is 1, which is the only legal value for data of type STRING.


460

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

To find the data, we need to take the offset from the start of the first index entry in the header (160), and add in the count of index entries (21) multiplied by the size of an index entry (10). Doing the math (all the values shown, are in hex, remember!), we arrive at the offset to the store, hex 370. Since the offset for this particular index entry is zero, the data should start at offset 370:
00000370: 7270 6d00 322e 322e 3100 3100 5265 6420 rpm.2.2.1.1.Red

Since the data type for this entry is a null-terminated string, we need to keep reading bytes until we reach a byte whose numeric value is zero. We find the bytes 72, 70, 6d, and 00 -- a null. Looking at the ASCII display on the right, we find that the bytes form the string rpm, which is the name of this package. Now for a slightly more complicated example. Let's look at the following index entry:
00000250: 0000 0403 0000 0008 0000 0199 0000 0018 ................

Tag 403 means that this entry is a list of filenames. The data type 8, or STRING_ARRAY, seems to bear this out. From the previous example, we found that the data area for the header began at offset 370. Adding the offset to the first filename (199), gives us 509. Finally, the count of 18 hex means that there should be 24 null-terminated strings containing filenames:
00000500: 696e 6974 6462 0a0a 002f 6269 6e2f 7270 00000510: 6d00 2f65 7463 2f72 706d 7263 002f 7573 initdb.../bin/rp m./etc/rpmrc./us

The byte at offset 509 is 2f -- a "/". Reading up to the first null byte, we find that the first filename is /bin/rpm, followed by /etc/rpmrc. This continues on for 22 more filenames. There are many more tags that we could decode, but they are all done in the same manner.


Section A.2:RPM File Format

461

Header Tag Listing The following list shows the tags available, along with their defined values, for use in the header. This list is current as of version 2.3 of RPM. For the most up-to-date version, look in the file lib/rpmlib.h in the latest version of the RPM sources.
#define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define RPMTAG_NAME RPMTAG_VERSION RPMTAG_RELEASE RPMTAG_SERIAL RPMTAG_SUMMARY RPMTAG_DESCRIPTION RPMTAG_BUILDTIME RPMTAG_BUILDHOST RPMTAG_INSTALLTIME RPMTAG_SIZE RPMTAG_DISTRIBUTION RPMTAG_VENDOR RPMTAG_GIF RPMTAG_XPM RPMTAG_COPYRIGHT RPMTAG_PACKAGER RPMTAG_GROUP RPMTAG_CHANGELOG RPMTAG_SOURCE RPMTAG_PATCH RPMTAG_URL RPMTAG_OS RPMTAG_ARCH RPMTAG_PREIN RPMTAG_POSTIN RPMTAG_PREUN RPMTAG_POSTUN RPMTAG_FILENAMES RPMTAG_FILESIZES RPMTAG_FILESTATES RPMTAG_FILEMODES RPMTAG_FILEUIDS RPMTAG_FILEGIDS RPMTAG_FILERDEVS RPMTAG_FILEMTIMES RPMTAG_FILEMD5S RPMTAG_FILELINKTOS RPMTAG_FILEFLAGS 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037


462

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

#define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define #define

RPMTAG_ROOT RPMTAG_FILEUSERNAME RPMTAG_FILEGROUPNAME RPMTAG_EXCLUDE RPMTAG_EXCLUSIVE RPMTAG_ICON RPMTAG_SOURCERPM RPMTAG_FILEVERIFYFLAGS RPMTAG_ARCHIVESIZE RPMTAG_PROVIDES RPMTAG_REQUIREFLAGS RPMTAG_REQUIRENAME RPMTAG_REQUIREVERSION RPMTAG_NOSOURCE RPMTAG_NOPATCH RPMTAG_CONFLICTFLAGS RPMTAG_CONFLICTNAME RPMTAG_CONFLICTVERSION RPMTAG_DEFAULTPREFIX RPMTAG_BUILDROOT RPMTAG_INSTALLPREFIX RPMTAG_EXCLUDEARCH RPMTAG_EXCLUDEOS RPMTAG_EXCLUSIVEARCH RPMTAG_EXCLUSIVEOS RPMTAG_AUTOREQPROV RPMTAG_RPMVERSION RPMTAG_TRIGGERSCRIPTS RPMTAG_TRIGGERNAME RPMTAG_TRIGGERVERSION RPMTAG_TRIGGERFLAGS RPMTAG_TRIGGERINDEX RPMTAG_VERIFYSCRIPT

1038 1039 1040 1041 /* not used */ 1042 /* not used */ 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 /* used internally by build */ 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1079

A.2.6 The Archive
Following the header section is the archive. The archive holds the actual files that comprise the package. The archive is compressed using GNU zip. We can verify this if we look at the start of the archive:
00000d40: 0000 001f 8b08 0000 0000 0002 03ec fd7b 00000d50: 7c13 d516 388e 4e92 691b 4a20 010a 1428 ...............{ |...8.N.i.J ...(


Section A.3:Tools For Studying RPM Files

463

In this example, the archive starts at offset d43. According to the contents of /usr/lib/magic, the first two bytes of a gzipped file should be 1f8b, which is, in fact, what we see. The following byte (08) is the flag used by GNU zip to indicate the file has been compressed with gzip's "deflation" method. The eighth byte has a value of 02, which means that the archive has been compresed using gzip's maximum compression setting. The following byte contains a code indicating the operating system under which the archive was compressed. A 03 in this byte indicates that the compression ran under a UNIX-like operating system. The remainder of the RPM package file is the compressed archive. After the archive is uncompressed, it is an ordinary cpio archive in SVR4 format with a CRC checksum.

A.3 Tools For Studying RPM Files
In the tools directory packaged with the RPM sources, are a number of small programs that use the RPM library to extract the various sections of a package file. Normally used by the RPM developers for debugging purposes, these tools can also be used to make it easier to understand the RPM package file format. Here is a list of the programs, and what they do: · · · · · rpmlead -- Extracts the lead section from a package file. rpmsignature -- Extracts the signature section from a package file. rpmheader -- Extracts the header from a package file. rpmarchive -- Extracts the archive from a package file. dump -- Displays a header structure in an easily readable format.

The first four programs take an RPM package file as their input. The package file can be read either from standard input, or by including the file name on the command line. In either case, the programs write to standard output. Here is how rpmlead can be used to display the lead from a package file:
# rpmlead foo.rpm | od -x 0000000 abed dbee 0003 0000 0100 7072 2d6d 2e32 0000020 2e32 2d31 0031 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000


464

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

0000040 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ... 0000100 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0100 0500 0000120 0004 0000 e124 bfff b36b 0800 e600 bfff 0000140 #

Since each of these programs can also act as filters, the following command is equivalent to the one above:
# cat foo.rpm 0000000 abed 0000020 2e32 0000040 0000 ... 0000100 0000 0000120 0004 0000140 # | rpmlead dbee 0003 2d31 0031 0000 0000 | od 0000 0000 0000 -x 0100 7072 2d6d 2e32 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000

0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0100 0500 0000 e124 bfff b36b 0800 e600 bfff

The dump program is used in conjunction with rpmsignature or rpmheader. It makes decoding header structures a snap:
# rpmsignature foo.rpm | dump Entry count: 3 Data count : 172 CT 000 000 001 000 008 002 000 008 016 024 032 040 048 056 TAG (1000)NAME 0x00044c4f (281679) (1001)VERSION b0 25 b0 97 15 97 01 df 35 d1 69 32 9c 53 (1002)RELEASE 89 00 95 03 05 00 31 63 90 a5 20 e8 f1 cb 9b f9 01 01 43 7b 04 9c 8e 0a d4 37 90 36 df b0 9a 8a 22 b5 b0 dc 30 4c 6f 91 b8 c1 70 4e 2c 64 d8 8a 8f 18 ab 5b 6f f0 41 eb TYPE INT32_TYPE BIN_TYPE 32 75 BIN_TYPE ed a2 00 4e b3 50 ca c8 OFSET COUNT 0x00000000 00000001 0x00000004 00000016

Entry Entry

Entry

: Data: : Data: Data: : Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data:

0x00000014 00000152


Section A.4: Identifying RPM files with the file(1) command

465

Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: Data: #

064 072 080 088 096 104 112 120 128 136 144

d1 9d b1 45 d1 60 28 2b 62 25 b1

8a dd da 74 05 f1 ed 1c 60 73 d2

01 e9 84 c4 fb c6 0b 2e 0b 1b c0

c9 56 94 9f 68 60 a0 de 3c bb 7f

36 31 6b ee 0c 27 08 e8 ba 5b 8a

01 42 ef 17 e6 9f 55 e3 04 65 fa

66 61 9c 35 71 03 9e 50 69 4d 4a

f0 b3 19 e1 5a 06 82 90 a9 e1 9b

One aspect of dump worth noting, is that it is optimized for decoding the header section of a package file. When used with rpmsignature, it displays the tag names used in the header, instead of the signature tag names. The data is displayed properly in either case, however.

A.4 Identifying RPM files with the file(1) command
The magic file on most UNIX-like systems today should have the necessary information to identify RPM files. But in case your system doesn't, the following information can be added to the file:
#------------------------------------------------------------------# # RPM: file(1) magic for Red Hat Packages # 0 beshort 0xedab >2 beshort 0xeedb RPM >>4 byte x v%d >>6 beshort 0 bin >>6 beshort 1 src >>8 beshort 1 i386 >>8 beshort 2 Alpha >>8 beshort 3 Sparc >>8 beshort 4 MIPS >>8 beshort 5 PowerPC >>8 beshort 6 68000 >>8 beshort 7 SGI


466

Appendix A:Format of the RPM File

>>10

string

x

%s

The output of the file command is succinct:
# file baz baz: RPM v3 bin i386 vlock-1.0-2 #

In this case, the file called baz is a version 3 format RPM file containing release 2 of version 1.0 of the vlock package, which has been built for the Intel x86 architecture.


Section B.1:Using the --showrc Option

467

B

The rpmrc File

The rpmrc file is used to control RPM's actions. The file's entries have an effect on nearly every aspect of RPM's operations. Here, we describe the rpmrc files in more detail, as well as the command used to show how RPM interprets the files.

B.1 Using the --showrc Option
As we'll see in a moment, RPM can read more than one rpmrc file, and each file can contain nearly thirty different types of entries. This can make it difficult to determine what values RPM is actually using. Luckily, there's an option that can be used to help make sense of it all. The --showrc option displays the value for each of the entries. The output is divided into two sections: 1. 2. Architecture and operating system values. rpmrc values.

The architecture and operating system values define the architecture and operating system that RPM is running on. These values define the environment for both building and installing packages. They also define which architectures and operating systems are compatible with each other. The rpmrc values define many aspects of RPM's operation. These values range from the path to RPM's database, to the name of the person listed as having built the package. Here's an example of --showrc's output:
# rpm --showrc ARCHITECTURE AND OS: build arch build os install arch install os compatible arch list compatible os list RPMRC VALUES: : : : : : : i386 Linux i486 Linux i486 i386 Linux


468

Appendix B:The rpmrc File

builddir buildroot cpiobin dbpath defaultdocdir distribution excludedocs ftpport ftpproxy messagelevel netsharedpath optflags packager pgp_name pgp_path require_distribution require_icon require_vendor root rpmdir signature sourcedir specdir srcrpmdir timecheck tmppath topdir vendor #

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

/usr/src/redhat/BUILD (not set) cpio /var/lib/rpm /usr/doc (not set) (not set) (not set) (not set) (not set) (not set) -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce (not set) (not set) (not set) (not set) (not set) (not set) (not set) /usr/src/redhat/RPMS none /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES /usr/src/redhat/SPECS /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS (not set) /var/tmp /usr/src/redhat (not set)

As you can see, the --showrc option clearly displays the values RPM will use. --showrc can also be used with the --rcfile option, which makes it easy to see the effect of specifying a different rpmrc file.

B.2 Different Places an rpmrc File Resides
RPM looks for rpmrc files in four places: 1. 2. 3. In /usr/lib/, for a file called rpmrc. In /etc/, for a file called rpmrc. In a file called .rpmrc in the user's login directory.


Section B.2:Different Places an rpmrc File Resides

469

4.

In a file specified by the --rcfile option, if the option is present on the command line.

The first three files are read in the order listed, such that if a given rmprc entry is present in each file, the value of the entry read last is the one used by RPM. This means, for example, that an entry in .rpmrc in the user's login directory will always override the same entry in /etc/rpmrc. Likewise, an entry in /etc/rpmrc will always override the same entry in /usr/lib/rpmrc. If the --rcfile option is used, then only /usr/lib/rpmrc and the file following the --rcfile option are read, in that order. The /usr/lib/rpmrc file is always read first. This cannot be changed. Let's look at each of these files, starting with /usr/lib/rpmrc.

B.2.1 /usr/lib/rpmrc
The file /usr/lib/rpmrc is always read. It contains information that RPM uses to set some default values. This file should never be modified! Doing so may cause RPM to operate incorrectly. After this stern warning, we should note that it's perfectly all right to look at it. Here it is, in fact:
############################################################# # Default values, often overridden in /etc/rpmrc dbpath: /var/lib/rpm topdir: /usr/src/redhat tmppath: /var/tmp cpiobin: cpio defaultdocdir: /usr/doc ############################################################# # Please send new entries to rpm-list@redhat.com ############################################################# # Values for RPM_OPT_FLAGS for various platforms optflags: i386 -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce optflags: alpha -O2


470

Appendix B:The rpmrc File

optflags: sparc -O2 optflags: m68k -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer ############################################################# # Canonical arch names and numbers arch_canon: i986: i986 1 arch_canon: i886: i886 1 arch_canon: i786: i786 1 arch_canon: i686: i686 1 arch_canon: i586: i586 1 arch_canon: i486: i486 1 arch_canon: i386: i386 1 arch_canon: alpha: alpha 2 arch_canon: sparc: sparc 3 arch_canon: sun4: sparc 3 arch_canon: sun4m: sparc 3 arch_canon: sun4c: sparc 3 # This is really a place holder arch_canon: mips: mips 4 arch_canon: ppc: ppc 5 # This is really a place holder arch_canon: m68k: m68k 6 # This is wrong. We really need arch_canon: IP: sgi 7 arch_canon: IP22: sgi arch_canon: arch_canon: 9000/712: sun4u: usparc

for MIPS.

for 68000 globbing in here :-( 7 hppa1.1 9 10

############################################################# # Canonical OS names and numbers os_canon: os_canon: # This is os_canon: os_canon: os_canon: os_canon: os_canon: os_canon: os_canon: Linux: Linux 1 IRIX: Irix 2 wrong SunOS5: solaris 3 SunOS4: SunOS 4 AmigaOS: AIX: HP-UX: OSF1: FreeBSD: AmigaOS AIX hpux10 osf1 FreeBSD 5 5 6 7 8


Section B.2:Different Places an rpmrc File Resides

471

############################################################# # For a given uname().machine, the default build arch buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: buildarchtranslate: osfmach3_i986: osfmach3_i886: osfmach3_i786: osfmach3_i686: osfmach3_i586: osfmach3_i486: osfmach3_i386: i986: i886: i786: i686: i586: i486: i386: i386 i386 i386 i386 i386 i386 i386 i386 i386 i386 i386 i386 i386 i386

buildarchtranslate: osfmach3_ppc: ppc ############################################################# # Architecture compatibility arch_compat: alpha: axp arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: arch_compat: i986: i886: i786: i686: i586: i486: i886 i786 i686 i586 i486 i386 i986 i886 i786 i686 i586 i486 i486 osfmach3_i886 osfmach3_i786 osfmach3_i686 osfmach3_i586 osfmach3_i486 osfmach3_i386

osfmach3_i986: osfmach3_i886: osfmach3_i786: osfmach3_i686: osfmach3_i586: osfmach3_i486: osfmach3_i386:

arch_compat: osfmach3_ppc: ppc arch_compat: usparc: sparc


472

Appendix B:The rpmrc File

Quite a bunch of stuff, isn't it? With the exception of the first five lines, which indicate where several important directories and programs are located, the remainder of this file contains rpmrc entries that are related to RPM's architecture and operating system processing. As you might imagine, any tinkering here will probably not be very productive, so leave any modifications here to the RPM developers. Next, we have /etc/rpmrc.

B.2.2 /etc/rpmrc
The file /etc/rpmrc, unlike /usr/lib/rpmrc, is fair game for modifications and additions. In fact, /etc/rpmrc isn't created by default, so its contents are entirely up to you. It's the perfect place to keep rpmrc entries of a system-wide or global nature. The vendor entry is a great example of a good candidate for inclusion in /etc/rpmrc. In most cases, a particular system is dedicated to building packages for one vendor. In these instances, setting the vendor entry in /etc/rpmrc is best. Next in the hierarchy is a file named .rpmrc, residing in the user's login directory.

B.2.3 .rpmrc in the user's login directory
As you might imagine, a file called .rpmrc in a user's login directory is only going to be read by that user when he or she runs RPM. Like /etc/rpmrc, this file is not created by default, but it can contain the same rpmrc entries as the other files. The packager entry, which should contain the name and contact information for the person who built the package, is an appropriate candidate for ~/.rpmrc.

B.2.4 File indicated by the --rcfile option
The --rcfile option is best used only when a totally different RPM configuration is desired for one or two packages. Since the only other rpmrc file read is /usr/lib/rpmrc with its low-level default settings, the file specified with the --rcfile option will have to be more comprehensive than either /etc/rpmrc or ~/.rmprc.


Section B.4:rpmrc File Entries

473

B.3 rpmrc File Syntax
As you might have surmised from the example file we briefly reviewed, the basic syntax of an rpmrc file entry is:
:

The part of the entry is not case sensitive, so any capitalization is acceptable. The colon separating the name from its value must immediately follow the name. No spaces are allowed here. The formatting requirements on the value side of the entry vary from value to value and will be discussed along with each entry.

B.4 rpmrc File Entries
In this section, we discuss the various entries that can be used in each of the rpmrc files.

B.4.1 arch_canon
The arch_canon entry is used to define a table of architecture names and their associated numbers. These canonical architecture names and numbers are then used internally by RPM whenever architecture-specific processing takes place. This entry's format is:
arch_canon::

The is compared against information from uname(2) after it's been translated using the appropriate buildarchtranslate entry. If a match is found, then is used by RPM to reference the system's architecture. When building a binary package, RPM uses as part of the package's filename, for instance. The is a numeric value RPM uses internally to identify the architecture. For example, this number is written in the header of each package file so that the file command can identify the architecture for which the package was built.


474

Appendix B:The rpmrc File

B.4.2 os_canon
The os_canon entry is used to define a table of operating system names and their associated numbers. These canonical operating system names and numbers are then used internally by RPM whenever operating system-specific processing takes place. This entry's format is:
os_canon::

The is compared against information from uname(2) after it's been translated using the appropriate buildostranslate entry. 1If a match is found, then is used by RPM to reference the operating system. The


is a numeric value used to uniquely identify the operating system.

B.4.3 buildarchtranslate
The buildarchtranslate entry is used in the process of defining the architecture that RPM will use as the "build" architecture. As the name implies, it is used to translate the raw information returned from uname(2) to the canonical architecture defined by arch_canon. The format of the buildarchtranslate entry is slightly different from most other rpmrc file entries. Instead of the usual : format, the buildarchtranslate entry looks like this:
buildarchtranslate::

The then

is compared against is used by RPM to

information from uname(2). If a match is found, define the build architecture.

B.4.4 buildostranslate
The buildostranslate entry is used in the process of defining the operating system RPM will use as the "build" operating system. As the name implies, it is used
1 The buildostranslate rpmrc file entry is discussed on Section B.4.4, buildostranslate.


Section B.4:rpmrc File Entries

475

to translate the raw information returned by uname(2) to the canonical operating sysetm defined by os_canon. The format of the buildostranslate entry is slightly different from most other rpmrc file entries. Instead of the usual : format, the buildostranslate entry looks like this:
buildostranslate::

The then

is compared against is used by RPM to

information from uname(2). If a match is found, define the build operating system.

B.4.5 arch_compat
The arch_compat entry is used to define which architectures are compatible with one another. This information is used when packages are installed; in this way, RPM can determine whether a given package file is compatible with the system. The format of the entry is:
arch_compat::

The is an architecture string, as defined by an arch_canon entry. The following it consists of one or more architectures, also defined by arch_canon. If there is more than one architecture in the list, they should be separated by a space. The architectures in the list are considered compatible to the architecture specified in the label.

B.4.6 os_compat
Default value: (operating system-specific) The os_compat entry is used to define which operating systems are compatible with one another. This information is used when packages are installed; in this way, RPM can determine whether a given package file is compatible with the system. The format of the entry is:
::


476

Appendix B:The rpmrc File

The is an operating system string, as defined by an os_canon entry. The following it consists of one or more operating systems, also defined by os_canon. If there is more than one operating system in the list, they should be separated by a space. The operating systems in the list are considered compatible to the operating system specified in the label.

B.4.7 builddir
Default value: /BUILD The builddir entry is used to define the path to the directory in which RPM will build packages. Its default value is taken from the value of the topdir entry, with "/BUILD" appended to it. Note that if you redefine builddir, you'll need to specify a complete path.

B.4.8 buildroot
Default value: (none) The buildroot entry defines the path used as the root directory during the install phase of a package build. For more information on using build roots, please see Section 16.1, Using Build Roots in a Package.

B.4.9 cpiobin
Default value: cpio The cpiobin entry is used to define the name (and optionally, path) of the cpio program. RPM uses cpio to perform a variety of functions, and needs to know where the program can be found.

B.4.10 dbpath
Default value: /var/lib/rpm The dbpath entry is used to define the directory in which the RPM database files are stored. It can be overridden by using the --dbpath option on the RPM command line.


Section B.4:rpmrc File Entries

477

B.4.11 defaultdocdir
Default value: /usr/doc The defaultdocdir entry is used to define the directory in which RPM will store documentation for all installed packages. It is used only during builds to support the %doc directive.

B.4.12 distribution
Default value: (none) The distribution entry is used to define the distribution for each package. The distribution can also be set by adding the distribution tag to a particular spec file. The distribution tag in the spec file overrides the distribution rpmrc file entry.

B.4.13 excludedocs
Default value:
0

The excludedocs entry is used to control if documentation should be written to disk when a package is installed. By default, documentation is installed; however, this can be overridden by setting the value of excludedocs to 1. Note also that the --excludedocs and --includedocs options can be added to the RPM command line to override the excludedocs entry's behavior. For more information on the --excludedocs and --includedocs options, please refer to Chapter 2, Using RPM to Install Packages.

B.4.14 ftpport
Default value: (none) The ftpport entry is used to define the port RPM should use when manipulating package files via FTP. See Section 2.4.15, --ftpport : Use In FTP-based Installs for more information on how FTP ports are used by RPM.

B.4.15 ftpproxy
Default value: (none)


478

Appendix B:The rpmrc File

The ftpproxy entry is used to define the hostname of the FTP proxy system RPM should use when manipulating package files via FTP. See Section 2.4.16, --ftpproxy : Use As Proxy In FTP-based Installs for more information on how FTP proxy systems are used by RPM.

B.4.16 messagelevel
Default value: 3 The messagelevel entry is used to define the desired verbosity level. Levels less than 3 produce greater amounts of output, while levels greater than 3 produce less output.

B.4.17 netsharedpath
Default value: (none) The netsharedpath entry is used to define one or more paths that, on the local system, are shared with other systems. If more than one path is specified, they must be separated with colons.

B.4.18 optflags
Default value: (architecture-specific) The optflags entry is used to define a standard set of options that can be used during the build process, specifically during compilation. The format of the optflags entry is slightly different from most other rpmrc file entries. Instead of the usual : format, the optflags entry looks like this:
optflags:

For example, assume the following optflags entries were placed in an rpmrc file:
optflags: i386 -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce optflags: sparc -O2


Section B.4:rpmrc File Entries

479

If RPM was running on an Intel 80386-compatible architecture, the optflags value would be set to -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce. If, however, RPM was running on a Sun SPARC-based system, optflags would be set to -O2. This entry sets the RPM_OPT_FLAGS environment variable, which can be used in the %prep, %build, and %install scripts.

B.4.19 packager
Default value: (none) The packager entry is used to define the name and contact information for the individual responsible for building the package. The contact information is traditionally defined in the following format:
packager:Erik Troan

B.4.20 pgp_name
Default value: (none) The pgp_name entry is used to define the name of the PGP public key that will be used to sign each package built. The value is not case sensitive, but the key name entered here must match the actual key name in every other aspect. For more information on signing packages with PGP, please read Chapter 17, Adding PGP Signatures to a Package.

B.4.21 pgp_path
Default value: (none) The pgp_path entry is used to point to a directory containing PGP keyring files. These files will be searched for the public key specified by the pgp_name entry. For more information on signing packages with PGP, please read Chapter 17, Adding PGP Signatures to a Package.


480

Appendix B:The rpmrc File

B.4.22 require_distribution
Default value:
0

The require_distribution entry is used to direct RPM to require that every package built must contain distribution information. The default value directs RPM to not enforce this requirement. If the entry has a non-zero value, RPM will only build packages that define a distribution.

B.4.23 require_icon
Default value:
0

The require_icon entry is used to direct RPM to require that every package built must contain an icon. The default value directs RPM to not enforce this requirement. If the entry has a non-zero value, RPM will only build packages that contain an icon.

B.4.24 require_vendor
Default value:
0

The require_vendor entry is used to direct RPM to require that every package built must contain vendor information. The default value directs RPM to not enforce this requirement. If the entry has a non-zero value, RPM will only build packages that define a vendor.

B.4.25 rpmdir
Default value: /RPMS The rpmdir entry is used to define the path to the directory in which RPM will write binary package files. Its default value is taken from the value of the topdir entry, with "/RPMS" appended to it. Note that if you redefine rpmdir, you'll need to specify a complete path. RPM will automatically add an architecture-specific directory to the end of the path. For example, on an Intel-based system, the actual path would be:
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386


Section B.4:rpmrc File Entries

481

B.4.26 signature
Default value: (none) The signature entry is used to define the type of signature that is to be added to each package built. At the present time, only signatures from PGP are supported. Therefore, the only acceptable value is "pgp". For more information on signing packages with PGP, please read Chapter 17, Adding PGP Signatures to a Package.

B.4.27 sourcedir
Default value: /SOURCES The sourcedir entry is used to define the path to the directory in which RPM will look for sources. Its default value is taken from the value of the topdir entry, with "/SOURCES" appended to it. Note that if you redefine sourcedir, you'll need to specify a complete path.

B.4.28 specdir
Default value: /SPECS The specdir entry is used to define the path to the directory in which RPM will look for spec files. Its default value is taken from the value of the topdir entry, with "/SPECS" appended to it. Note that if you redefine specdir, you'll need to specify a complete path.

B.4.29 srcrpmdir
Default value: /SRPMS The srcrpmdir entry is used to define the path to the directory in which RPM will write source package files. Its default value is taken from the value of the topdir entry, with "/SRPMS" appended to it. Note that if you redefine srcrpmdir, you'll need to specify a complete path.

B.4.30 timecheck
Default value: (none)


482

Appendix B:The rpmrc File

The timecheck entry is used to define the default number of seconds to apply to the --timecheck option when building packages. For more information on the --timecheck option, please see Section 12.1.14, --timecheck -- Print a warning if files to be packaged are over old .

B.4.31 tmppath
Default value: /var/tmp The tmpdir entry is used to define a path to the directory that RPM will use for temporary work space. This normally consists of temporary scripts that are used during the build process. It should be set to an absolute path (ie, starting with "/").

B.4.32 topdir
Default value: /usr/src/redhat The topdir entry is used to define the path to the top-level directory in RPM's build directory tree. It should be set to an absolute path (ie, starting with "/"). The following entries base their default values on the value of topdir: · · · · · builddir rpmdir sourcedir specdir srcrpmdir

B.4.33 vendor
Default value: (none) The vendor entry is used to define the name of the organization that is responsible for distributing the packaged software. Normally, this would be the name of a business or other such entity.


Section C.3:Query Mode

483

C
· · · · · ·

Concise RPM Command Reference
--quiet -- Print as little output as possible. -v -- Be a little more verbose. -vv -- Be incredibly verbose (for debugging). --root -- Use as the top level directory. --dbpath -- Use as the directory for the database. --rcfile -- Use instead of /etc/rpmrc and $HOME/.rpmrc.

C.1 Global Options
The following options can be used in any of RPM's modes:

C.2 Informational Options
The following options are used to display information about RPM: Format: rpm · · · · --version -- Print the version of rpm being used. --help -- Print a help message. --showrc -- Show rcfile information. --querytags -- List the tags that can be used with --queryformat.

C.3 Query Mode
RPM's query mode is used to display information about packages: Format: rpm --query or


484

Appendix C:Concise RPM Command Reference

Format: rpm -q

C.3.1 Package Specification Options To Query Mode
No more than one of the following options may be present in every query command. They are used to select the source of the information to be displayed. · · · · · · · -- Query the named package. -a -- Query all packages. -f + -- Query package owning . -g + -- Query packages with group . -p + -- Query (uninstalled) package . --whatprovides -- Query packages that provide capability. --whatrequires -- Query packages that require capability.

C.3.2 Information Selection Options To Query Mode
One or more of the following options may be added to any query command. They are used to select what information RPM will display. If no information selection option is present on the command line, RPM will simply display the applicable package label(s): · · · · · · · · -i -- Display package information. -l -- Display package file list. -s -- Show file states (implies -l). -d -- List only documentation files (implies -l). -c -- List only configuration files (implies -l). --dump -- Show all available information for each file (must be used with -l, -c, or -d). --provides -- List capabilities that the package provides. --requires, -R -- List capabilities that the package requires.


Section C.5:Install Mode

485

· · ·

--scripts -- Print the various [un]install, verification scripts. --queryformat -- Use as the header format (implies -i). --qf -- Shorthand for --queryformat.

C.4 Verify Mode
RPM's verification mode is used to ensure that a package is still installed properly: Format: rpm --verify or Format: rpm -V or Format: rpm -y

C.4.1 Options To Verify Mode
The following options can be used on any verify command: · · · --nodeps -- Do not verify package dependencies. --nofiles -- Do not verify file attributes. --noscripts -- Do not execute the package's verification script.

C.5 Install Mode
RPM's installation mode is used to install packages: Format: rpm --install or Format: rpm -i


486

Appendix C:Concise RPM Command Reference

C.5.1 Options To Install Mode
The following options can be used on any install command: · · · · · · · · · · · · · -h, --hash -- Print hash marks as package installs (good with -v). --prefix -- Relocate the package to , if relocatable. --excludedocs -- Do not install documentation. --force -- Shorthand for --replacepkgs and --replacefiles. --ignorearch -- Do not verify package architecture. --ignoreos -- Do not verify package operating system. --includedocs -- Install documentation. --nodeps -- Do not check package dependencies. --noscripts -- Do not execute any installation scripts. --percent -- Print percentages as package installs. --replacefiles -- Install even if the package replaces installed files. --replacepkgs -- Reinstall if the package is already present. --test -- Do not install, but tell if it would work or not.

C.6 Upgrade Mode
RPM's upgrade mode is used to upgrade packages: Format: rpm --upgrade or Format: rpm -U

C.6.1 Options To Upgrade Mode
The following options can be used on any upgrade command: · -h, --hash -- Print hash marks as package installs (good with -v).


Section C.7:Erase Mode

487

· · · · · · · · · · · · ·

--prefix -- Relocate the package to , if relocatable. --excludedocs -- Do not install documentation. --force -- Shorthand for --replacepkgs, --replacefiles, and --oldpackage. --ignorearch -- Do not verify package architecture. --ignoreos -- Do not verify package operating system. --includedocs -- Install documentation. --nodeps -- Do not verify package dependencies. --noscripts -- Do not execute any installation scripts. --percent -- Print percentages as package installs. --replacefiles -- Install even if the package replaces installed files. --replacepkgs -- Reinstall if the package is already present. --test -- Do not install, but tell if it would work or not. --oldpackage -- Upgrade to an old version of the package (--force on upgrades does this automatically).

C.7 Erase Mode
RPM's erase mode is used to erase previously installed packages: Format: rpm --erase or Format: rpm -e

C.7.1 Options To Erase Mode
The following options can be used on any erase command: · · --nodeps -- Do not verify package dependencies. --noscripts -- Do not execute any installation scripts.


488

Appendix C:Concise RPM Command Reference

C.8 Build Mode
RPM's build mode is used to build packages: Format: rpm -b (Note that -vv is the default for all build mode commands.)

C.8.1 Build Mode Stages
One of the following stages must follow the -b option: · · · · · · p -- Prep (unpack sources and apply patches). l -- List check (do some cursory checks on %files). c -- Compile (prep and compile). i -- Install (prep, compile, install). b -- Binary package (prep, compile, install, package). a -- Binary/source package (prep, compile, install, package).

C.8.2 Options To Build Mode
The following options can be used on any build command: · · · · · · · · --short-circuit -- Skip straight to specified stage (only for c and i). --clean -- Remove build tree when done. --sign -- Generate PGP signature. --buildroot -- Use as the build root. --buildarch -- Use as the build architecture. --buildos -- Use as the build operating system. --test -- Do not execute any stages. --timecheck -- Set the time check to seconds (0 disables it).


Section C.12:Add Signature Mode

489

C.9 Rebuild Mode
RPM's rebuild mode is used to rebuild packages from a source package file. The source archives, patches, and icons that comprise the source package are removed after the binary package is built. Rebuild mode implies --clean. Format: rpm --rebuild (Note that -vv is the default for all rebuild mode commands.)

C.9.1 Options To Rebuild Mode
Only the global options may be used.

C.10 Recompile Mode
RPM's recompile mode is used to recompile software from a source package file. Unlike --rebuild, no binary package is created. Format: rpm --recompile (Note that -vv is the default for all recompile mode commands.)

C.10.1 Options To Recompile Mode
Only the global options may be used.

C.11 Resign Mode
RPM's resign mode is used to replace a package's signature with a new one: Format: rpm --resign +

C.11.1 Options To Resign Mode
Only the global options may be used.

C.12 Add Signature Mode
RPM's add signature mode is used to add a signature to a package:


490

Appendix C:Concise RPM Command Reference

Format: rpm --addsign +

C.12.1 Options To Add Signature Mode
Only the global options may be used.

C.13 Check Signature Mode
RPM's check signature mode is used to verify a package's signature: Format: rpm --checksig + or Format: rpm -K +

C.13.1 Options To Check Signature Mode
The following option can be used on any check signature command: · --nopgp -- Skip any PGP signatures (size and MD5 only).

C.14 Initalize Database Mode
RPM's initalize database mode is used to create a new RPM database: Format: rpm --initdb

C.14.1 Options to Initalize database Mode
Only the global options may be used.

C.15 Rebuild Database Mode
RPM's rebuild database mode is used to rebuild an RPM database: Format: rpm --rebuilddb

C.15.1 Options to Rebuild Database Mode
Only the global options may be used.


Section D.1:List of --queryformat Tags

491

D

Available Tags For --queryformat
rpm --querytags

The following tags were defined at the time this book was written. For the latest list of available queryformat tags, please issue the following command:

Keep in mind that the list of tags produced by the --querytags option is the complete list of all tags used by RPM internally; for instance, during package builds. Because of this, some tags do not produce meaningful output when used in a --queryformat format string.

D.1 List of --queryformat Tags
For every tag in this section, there can be as many as three different pieces of information: 1. 2. 3. A short description of the tag. Whether the data specified by the tag is an array, and if so, how many members are present in the array. What modifiers can be used with the tag.

D.1.1 The NAME Tag
The NAME tag is used to display the name of the package. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.2 The VERSION Tag
The VERSION tag is used to display the version of the packaged software. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A


492

Appendix D:Available Tags For --queryformat

D.1.3 The RELEASE Tag
The RELEASE tag is used to display the release number of the package. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.4 The SERIAL Tag
The SERIAL tag is used to display the serial number of the package. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.5 The SUMMARY Tag
The SUMMARY tag is used to display a one-line summation of the packaged software. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.6 The DESCRIPTION Tag
The DESCRIPTION tag is used to display a detailed summation of the packaged software. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.7 The BUILDTIME Tag
The BUILDTIME tag is used to display the time and date the package was created. Array: No Used with modifiers: :date

D.1.8 The BUILDHOST Tag
The BUILDHOST tag is used to display the hostname of the system that built the package.


Section D.1:List of --queryformat Tags

493

Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.9 The INSTALLTIME Tag
The INSTALLTIME tag is used to display the time and date the package was installed. Array: No Used with modifiers: :date

D.1.10 The SIZE Tag
The SIZE tag is used to display the total size, in bytes, of every file installed by this package. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.11 The DISTRIBUTION Tag
The DISTRIBUTION tag is used to display the distribution this package is a part of. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.12 The VENDOR Tag
The VENDOR tag is used to display the organization responsible for marketing the package. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.13 The GIF Tag
The GIF tag is not available for use with --queryformat.


494

Appendix D:Available Tags For --queryformat

D.1.14 The XPM Tag
The XPM tag is not available for use with --queryformat.

D.1.15 The COPYRIGHT Tag
The COPYRIGHT tag is used to display the copyright terms of the package. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.16 The PACKAGER Tag
The PACKAGER tag is used to display the person or persons responsible for creating the package. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.17 The GROUP Tag
The GROUP tag is used to display the group to which the package belongs. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.18 The CHANGELOG Tag
The CHANGELOG tag is reserved for a future version of RPM.

D.1.19 The SOURCE Tag
The SOURCE tag is used to display the source archives contained in the source package file. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per source) Used with modifiers: N/A


Section D.1:List of --queryformat Tags

495

D.1.20 The PATCH Tag
The PATCH tag is used to display the patch files contained in the source package file. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per patch) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.21 The URL Tag
The URL tag is used to display the Uniform Resource Locator that points to additional information on the packaged software. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.22 The OS Tag
The OS tag is used to display the operating system for which the package was built. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.23 The ARCH Tag
The ARCH tag is used to display the architecture for which the package was built. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.24 The PREIN Tag
The PREIN tag is used to display the package's pre-install script. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.25 The POSTIN Tag
The POSTIN tag is used to display the package's post-install script.


496

Appendix D:Available Tags For --queryformat

Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.26 The PREUN Tag
The PREUN tag is used to display the package's pre-uninstall script. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.27 The POSTUN Tag
The POSTUN tag is used to display the package's post-uninstall script. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.28 The FILENAMES Tag
The FILENAMES tag is used to display the names of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filenames) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.29 The FILESIZES Tag
The FILESIZES tag is used to display the size, in bytes, of each of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filesizes) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.30 The FILESTATES Tag
The FILESTATES tag is used to display the state of each of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filestates)


Section D.1:List of --queryformat Tags

497

Used with modifiers: N/A

1

D.1.31 The FILEMODES Tag
The FILEMODES tag is used to display the permissions of each of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filemodes) Used with modifiers: :perms

D.1.32 The FILEUIDS Tag
The FILEUIDS tag is used to display the user ID, in numeric form, of each of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per fileuids) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.33 The FILEGIDS Tag
The FILEGIDS tag is used to display the group ID, in numeric form, of each of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filegids) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.34 The FILERDEVS Tag
The FILERDEVS tag is used to display the major and minor numbers for each of the files that comprise the package. It will only be non-zero for device special files. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filerdevs) Used with modifiers: N/A
1 Since there is no modifier to display the file states in human-readable form, it will be necessary to manually interpret the flag values, based on the RPMFILE_STATE_xxx #defines contained in rpmlib.h. This file is part of the rpm-devel package and is also present in the RPM source package.


498

Appendix D:Available Tags For --queryformat

D.1.35 The FILEMTIMES Tag
The FILEMTIMES tag is used to display the modification time and date for each of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filemtimes) Used with modifiers: :date

D.1.36 The FILEMD5S Tag
The FILEMD5S tag is used to display the MD5 checksum for each of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filemd5s) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.37 The FILELINKTOS Tag
The FILELINKTOS tag is used to display the link string for symlinks. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filelinktos) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.38 The FILEFLAGS Tag
The FILEFLAGS tag is used to indicate whether the files that comprise the package have been flagged as being documentation or configuration. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per fileflags) Used with modifiers: :fflags

D.1.39 The ROOT Tag
The ROOT tag is not available for use with --queryformat.

D.1.40 The FILEUSERNAME Tag
The FILEUSERNAME tag is used to display the owner, in alphanumeric form, of each of the files that comprise the package.


Section D.1:List of --queryformat Tags

499

Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.41 The FILEGROUPNAME Tag
The FILEGROUPNAME tag is used to display the group, in alphanumeric form, of each of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per filegroupname) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.42 The EXCLUDE Tag
The EXCLUDE tag is deprecated and should no longer be used.

D.1.43 The EXCLUSIVE Tag
The EXCLUSIVE tag is deprecated and should no longer be used.

D.1.44 The ICON Tag
The ICON tag is not available for use with --queryformat.

D.1.45 The SOURCERPM Tag
The SOURCERPM tag is used to display the name of the source package from which this binary package was built. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.46 The FILEVERIFYFLAGS Tag
The FILEVERIFYFLAGS tag is used to display the numeric value of the file verification flags for each of the files that comprise the package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per fileverifyflags)


500

Appendix D:Available Tags For --queryformat

Used with modifiers: N/A

2

D.1.47 The ARCHIVESIZE Tag
The ARCHIVESIZE tag is used to display the size, in bytes, of the archive portion of the original package file. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.48 The PROVIDES Tag
The PROVIDES tag is used to display the capabilities the package provides. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per provides) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.49 The REQUIREFLAGS Tag
The REQUIREFLAGS tag is used to display the requirement flags for each capability the package requires. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per requireflags) Used with modifiers: :depflags

D.1.50 The REQUIRENAME Tag
The REQUIRENAME tag is used to display the capabilities the package requires. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per requirename) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.51 The REQUIREVERSION Tag
The REQUIREVERSION tag is used to display the version-related aspect of each capbility the package requires.
2 Since there is no modifier to display the verification flags in human-readable form, it will be necessary to manually interpret the flag values, based on the RPMVERIFY_xxx #defines contained in rpmlib.h. This file is part of the rpm-devel package and is also present in the RPM source package.


Section D.1:List of --queryformat Tags

501

Array: Yes (Size: One entry per requireversion) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.52 The NOSOURCE Tag
The NOSOURCE tag is used to display the source archives that are not contained in the source package file. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per nosource) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.53 The NOPATCH Tag
The NOPATCH tag is used to display the patch files that are not contained in the source package file. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per nopatch) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.54 The CONFLICTFLAGS Tag
The CONFLICTFLAGS tag is used to display the conflict flags for each capability the package conflicts with. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per conflictflags) Used with modifiers: :depflags

D.1.55 The CONFLICTNAME Tag
The CONFLICTNAME tag is used to display the capabilities that the package conflicts with. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per conflictname) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.56 The CONFLICTVERSION Tag
The CONFLICTVERSION tag is used to display the version-related aspect of each capability the package conflicts with.


502

Appendix D:Available Tags For --queryformat

Array: Yes (Size: One entry per conflictversion) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.57 The DEFAULTPREFIX Tag
The DEFAULTPREFIX tag is used to display the path that will, by default, be used to install a relocatable package. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.58 The BUILDROOT Tag
The BUILDROOT tag is not available for use with --queryformat.

D.1.59 The INSTALLPREFIX Tag
The INSTALLPREFIX tag is used to display the actual path used when a relocatable package was installed. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.60 The EXCLUDEARCH Tag
The EXCLUDEARCH tag is used to display the architectures that should not install this package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per excludearch) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.61 The EXCLUDEOS Tag
The EXCLUDEOS tag is used to display the operating systems that should not install this package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per excludeos) Used with modifiers: N/A


Section D.1:List of --queryformat Tags

503

D.1.62 The EXCLUSIVEARCH Tag
The EXCLUSIVEARCH tag is used to display the architectures that are the only ones that should install this package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per exclusivearch) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.63 The EXCLUSIVEOS Tag
The EXCLUSIVEOS tag is used to display the operating systems that are the only one that should install this package. Array: Yes (Size: One entry per exclusiveos) Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.64 The AUTOREQPROV Tag
The AUTOREQPROV tag is not available for use with --queryformat.

D.1.65 The RPMVERSION Tag
The RPMVERSION tag is used to display the version of RPM that was used to build the package. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A

D.1.66 The TRIGGERSCRIPTS Tag
The TRIGGERSCRIPTS tag is reserved for a future version of RPM.

D.1.67 The TRIGGERNAME Tag
The TRIGGERNAME tag is reserved for a future version of RPM.

D.1.68 The TRIGGERVERSION Tag
The TRIGGERVERSION tag is reserved for a future version of RPM.


504

Appendix D:Available Tags For --queryformat

D.1.69 The TRIGGERFLAGS Tag
The TRIGGERFLAGS tag is reserved for a future version of RPM.

D.1.70 The TRIGGERINDEX Tag
The TRIGGERINDEX tag is reserved for a future version of RPM.

D.1.71 The VERIFYSCRIPT Tag
The VERIFYSCRIPT tag is used to display the script to be used for package verification. Array: No Used with modifiers: N/A


Section E.2:The Preamble

505

E

Concise Spec File Reference

E.1 Comments
Comments are a way to make RPM ignore a line in the spec file. To create a comment, enter an octothorp (#) at the start of the line. Any text following the comment character will be ignored by RPM:
# This is the spec file for playmidi 2.3...

Comments can be placed in any section of the spec file. See also: Section 13.1, Comments: Notes Ignored by RPM.

E.2 The Preamble
This section outlines the tags that comprise a spec file's preamble.

E.2.1 Package Naming Tags
This section outlines the tags that are used to name a package. The name Tag The name tag is used to define the name of the software being packaged.
Name: cdplayer

See also: The name Tag in Section 13.2.1. The version Tag The version tag defines the version of the software being packaged.
Version: 1.2

See also: The version Tag in Section 13.2.1.


506

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

The release Tag The release tag can be thought of as the package's version.
Release: 5

See also: The release Tag in Section 13.2.1.

E.2.2 Descriptive Tags
The %description Tag The %description tag is used to define an in-depth description of the packaged software. In the descriptive text, a space in the first column indicates that that line of text should be presented to user as-is, with no formatting done by RPM. Blank lines in the descriptive text denote paragraphs.
%description It slices! It dices! It's a CD player app that can't be beat. By using the resonant frequency of the CD itself, it is able to simulate 20X oversampling. This leads to sound quality that cannot be equaled with more mundane software...

The %description tag can be made specific to a particular subpackage by adding the subpackage name, and optionally, the -n option:
%description bar %description -n bar

The subpackage name and usage of the -n option must match those defined with the %package directive. See also: The %description Tag in Section 13.2.2. The summary Tag The summary tag is used to define a one-line description of the packaged software.


Section E.2:The Preamble

507

Summary: A CD player app that rocks!

See also: The summary Tag in Section 13.2.2. The copyright Tag The copyright tag is used to define the copyright terms applicable to the software being packaged.
Copyright: GPL

See also: The copyright Tag in Section 13.2.2. The distribution Tag The distribution tag is used to define a group of packages, of which this package is a part.
Distribution: Doors '95

See also: The distribution Tag in Section 13.2.2. The icon Tag The icon tag is used to name a file containing an icon representing the packaged software. The file may be in either GIF or XPM format, although XPM is preferred. In either case, the background of the icon should be transparent.
Icon: foo.xpm

See also: The icon Tag in Section 13.2.2. The vendor Tag The vendor tag is used to define the name of the entity that is responsible for packaging the software.
Vendor: White Socks Software, Inc.


508

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

See also: The vendor Tag in Section 13.2.2. The url Tag The url tag is used to define a Uniform Resource Locator that can be used to obtain additional information about the packaged software.
URL: http://www.gnomovision.com/cdplayer.html

See also: The url Tag in Section 13.2.2. The group Tag The group tag is used to group packages together by the types of functionality they provide.
Group: Applications/Editors

See also: The group Tag in Section 13.2.2. The packager Tag The packager tag is used to hold the name and contact information for the person or persons who built the package.
Packager: Fred Foonly

See also: The packager Tag in Section 13.2.2.

E.2.3 Dependency Tags
The provides Tag The provides tag is used to specify a "virtual package" that the packaged software makes available when it is installed.
Provides: module-info

See also: The provides Tag in Section 13.2.3.


Section E.2:The Preamble

509

The requires Tag The requires tag is used to alert RPM to the fact that the package needs to have certain capabilities available in order to operate properly.
Requires: playmidi

A version may be specified, following the package specification. The following comparison operators may be placed between the package and version:
<, >, =, >=, or <=

Requires: playmidi >= 2.3

If the Requires tag needs to perform a comparison against a serial numbered defined with the serial tag, then the proper format would be:
Requires: playmidi =S 4

See also: The requires Tag in Section 13.2.3. The serial Tag The serial tag is used to define a serial number for a package. This is only necessary if RPM is unable to determine the ordering of a package's version numbers.
Serial: 4

See also: The serial Tag in Section 13.2.3. The conflicts Tag The conflicts tag is used to alert RPM to the fact that the package is not compatible with other packages.
Conflicts: playmidi


510

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

A version may be specified, following the package specification. The following comparison operators may be placed between the package and version:
<, >, =, >=, or <=

Conflicts: playmidi >= 2.3

If the conflicts tag needs to perform a comparison against a serial numbered defined with the serial tag, then the proper format would be:
Conflicts: playmidi =S 4

See also: The conflicts Tag in Section 13.2.3. The autoreqprov Tag The autoreqprov tag is used to control the automatic dependency processing performed when the package is being built. To disable automatic dependency processing, add the following line:
AutoReqProv: no

(The number 0 may be used instead of no) Although RPM defaults to performing automatic dependency processing, the effect of the autoreqprov tag can be reversed by changing no to yes. (The number 1 may be used instead of yes) See also: The autoreqprov Tag in Section 13.2.3.

E.2.4 Architecture- and Operating System-Specific Tags
The excludearch Tag The excludearch tag is used to direct RPM to ensure that the package does not attempt to build on the excluded architecture(s).
ExcludeArch: sparc alpha


Section E.2:The Preamble

511

See also: The excludearch Tag in Section 13.2.4. The exclusivearch Tag The exclusivearch tag is used to direct RPM to ensure the package is only built on the specified architecture(s).
ExclusiveArch: sparc alpha

See also: The exclusivearch Tag in Section 13.2.4. The excludeos Tag The excludeos tag is used to direct RPM to ensure that the package does not attempt to build on the excluded operating system(s).
ExcludeOS: linux irix

See also: The excludeos Tag in Section 13.2.4. The exclusiveos Tag The exclusiveos tag is used to denote which operating system(s) should only be be permitted to build the package.
ExclusiveOS: linux

See also: The exclusiveos Tag in Section 13.2.4.

E.2.5 Directory-related Tags
The prefix Tag The prefix tag is used to define part of the path RPM will use when installing the package's files. The prefix can be redefined by the user when the package is installed, thereby changing where the package is installed.
Prefix: /opt

See also: The prefix Tag in Section 13.2.5.


512

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

The buildroot Tag The buildroot tag is used to define an alternate build root, where the software will be installed during the build process.
BuildRoot: /tmp/cdplayer

See also: The buildroot Tag in Section 13.2.5.

E.2.6 Source and Patch Tags
The source Tag The source tag is used to define the filename of the sources to be packaged. When there is more than one source tag in a spec file, each one must be numbered so they are unique, starting with the number 0. When there is only one tag, it does not need to be numbered. By convention, the source filename is usually preceded by a URL pointing to the location of the original sources, but RPM does not require this.
Source0: ftp://ftp.gnomovision.com/pub/cdplayer-1.0.tgz Source1: foo.tgz

See also: The source Tag in Section 13.2.6. The nosource Tag The nosource tag is used to alert RPM to the fact that one or more source files should be excluded from the source package file. The tag is followed by one or more numbers. The numbers correspond to the numbers following the source tags that are to be excluded from packaging.
NoSource: 0, 3

See also: The nosource Tag in Section 13.2.6.


Section E.3:Scripts

513

The patch Tag The patch tag is used to define the name of a patch file to be applied to the package's sources. When there is more than one patch tag in a spec file, each one must be numbered so they are unique, starting with the number 0. When there is only one tag, it does not need to be numbered.
Patch: cdp-0.33-fsstnd.patch

See also: The patch Tag in Section 13.2.6. The nopatch Tag The nopatch tag is used to alert RPM to the fact that one or more patch files should be excluded from the source package file. The tag is followed by one or more numbers. The numbers correspond to the numbers following the patch tags that are to be excluded from packaging.
NoPatch: 2 3

See also: The nopatch Tag in Section 13.2.6.

E.3 Scripts
This section lists the various scripts found in a spec file.

E.3.1 Build-time Scripts
Every build-time script has the following environment variables defined: · · · · · ·
RPM_SOURCE_DIR RPM_BUILD_DIR RPM_DOC_DIR RPM_OPT_FLAGS RPM_ARCH RPM_OS


514

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

· · · · ·

RPM_ROOT_DIR RPM_BUILD_ROOT RPM_PACKAGE_NAME RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE

For more information on these environment variables, and build-time scripts in general, please see Section 13.3.1, Build-time Scripts. The %prep Script The %prep script is the first script RPM executes during a build. As the name implies, it is normally used to prepare the sources for building. The commands in the script can be any valid sh commands.
%prep

See also: The %prep Script in Section 13.3.1. The %build Script The %build script is the second script RPM executes during a build. As the name implies, it is normally used to build the software. The commands in the script can be any valid sh commands.
%build

See also: The %build Script in Section 13.3.1. The %install Script The %install script is the third script RPM executes during a build. As the name implies, it is normally used to install the software. The commands in the script can be any valid sh commands.
%install


Section E.3:Scripts

515

See also: The %install Script in Section 13.3.1. The %clean Script The %clean script, as the name implies, is used to clean up the software's build directory tree. RPM will normally do this for you, but in certain cases (most notably in those packages that use a build root) you'll need to include a %clean script. The commands in the script can be any valid sh commands.
%clean

See also: The %clean Script in Section 13.3.1.

E.3.2 Install-/Erase-time Scripts
These scripts are executed whenever the package is installed or erased. Each script can consist of any valid sh commands. Note: Each of the following scripts can be made specific to a particular subpackage by adding the subpackage name, and optionally, the -n option:
%post bar %preun -n bar

The subpackage name and usage of the -n option must match those defined with the %package directive. Each script has the following environment variable defined: ·
RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX

For more information on this environment variable please see Section 13.3.2, Install/Erase-time Scripts. The %pre Script The %pre script executes just before the package is to be installed.
%pre


516

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

See also: The %pre Script in Section 13.3.2. The %post Script The %post script executes just after the package is to be installed.
%post

See also: The %post Script in Section 13.3.2. The %preun Script The %preun script executes just before the package is to be erased.
%preun

See also: The %preun Script in Section 13.3.2. The %postun Script The %postun script executes just after the package is to be erased.
%postun

See also: The %postun Script in Section 13.3.2.

E.3.3 Verification Script
This section describes the verification script. The %verifyscript Script The %verifyscript script executes whenever the package is verified using RPM's -V option. The script can consist of any valid sh commands. See also: Section 13.3.3, Verification-Time Script -- The %verifyscript Script .

E.4 Macros
This section describes the various macros used by RPM.


Section E.4:Macros

517

E.4.1 The %setup Macro
The %setup macro is used to unpack the original sources in preparation for the build. It is used in the %prep script:
%prep %setup

See also: Section 13.4.1, The %setup Macro. The -n Option The -n option is used to set the name of the software's build directory. This is necessary only when the source archive unpacks into a directory named other than - .
%setup -n cd-player

See also: -n -- Set Name of Build Directory in Section 13.4.1. The -c Option The -c option is used to direct %setup to create the top-level build directory before unpacking the sources.
%setup -c

See also: -c -- Create Directory (and change to it) Before Unpacking in Section 13.4.1. The -D Option The -D option is used to direct %setup to not delete the build directory prior to unpacking the sources. This option is used when more than one source archive is to be unpacked into the build directory, normally with the -b or -a options.
%setup -D -T -b 3

See also: -D -- Do Not Delete Directory Before Unpacking Sources in Section 13.4.1.


518

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

The -T Option The -T option is used to direct %setup to not perform the default unpacking of the source archive specified by the first source tag. It is used with the -a or -b options.
%setup -D -T -a 1

See also: -T -- Do Not Perform Default Archive Unpacking in Section 13.4.1. The -b Option The -b option is used to direct %setup to unpack the source archive specified on the nth source tag line before changing directory into the build directory.
%setup -D -T -b 2

See also: -b -- Unpack The nth Sources Before Changing Directory in Section 13.4.1. The -a Option The -a option is used to direct %setup to unpack the source archive specified on the nth source tag line after changing directory into the build directory.
%setup -D -T -a 5

See also: -a -- Unpack The nth Sources After Changing Directory in Section 13.4.1.

E.4.2 The %patch Macro
The %patch macro, as its name implies, is used to apply patches to the unpacked sources. With no additional options specified, it will apply the patch file specified by the patch (or patch0) tag.
%patch


Section E.4:Macros

519

When there is more than one patch tag line in a spec file, they can be specified by appending the number of the patch tag to the %patch macro name itself.
%patch2

See also: Section 13.4.2, The %patch Macro. The -P Option The -P option is another method of applying a specific patch. The number from the patch tag follows the -P option. The following %patch macros both apply the patch specified on the patch2 tag line:
%patch -P 2 %patch2

See also: Specifying Which patch Tag to Use in Section 13.4.2. The -p<#> Option The -p option is sent directly to the patch command. It is followed by a number which specifies the number of leading slashes (and the directories in between) to strip from any filenames present in the patch file.
%patch -p2

See also: -p <#> -- Strip <#> leading slashes and directories from patch filenames in Section 13.4.2. The -b Option When the patch command is used to apply a patch, unmodified copies of the files patched are renamed to end with the extension .orig. The -b option is used to change the extension used by patch.
%patch -b .fsstnd

See also: -b -- Set the backup file extension to in Section 13.4.2.


520

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

The %patch -E Option The -E option is sent directly to the patch command. It is used to direct patch to remove any empty files after the patches have been applied. See also: -E -- Remove Empty Output Files in Section 13.4.2.

E.5 The %files List
The %files list indicates which files on the build system are to be packaged. The list consists of one file per line. If a directory is specified, by default all files and subdirectories will be packaged.
%files /etc/foo.conf /sbin/foo /usr/bin/foocmd

The %files list can be made specific to a particular subpackage by adding the subpackage name, and optionally, the -n option:
%files bar %files -n bar

The subpackage name and usage of the -n option must match those defined with the %package directive. The %files list can also use the contents of a file as the list of files to be packaged. This is done by using the -f option, which is then followed by a filename:
%files -f files.list

See also: Section 13.5, The %files List.

E.6 Directives For the %files list
This section lists the various directived used in the %files lists.


Section E.6:Directives For the %files list

521

E.6.1 File-related Directives
This section lists those directives that are related to files. The %doc Directive The %doc directive flags the filename(s) that follow as being documentation.
%doc README

See also: The %doc Directive in Section 13.6.1. The %config Directive The %config directive is used to flag the specified file as being a configuration file.
%config /etc/fstab

See also: The %config Directive in Section 13.6.1. The %attr Directive The %attr directive is used to permit RPM to directly control a file's permissions and ownership. It is normally used when non-root users build packages. The %attr directive has the following format:
%attr(, , ) file

The user and group identifiers must be non-numeric. Attributes that do not need to be set by %attr may be replaced with a dash:
%attr(755, root, -) foo.bar

See also: The %attr Directive in Section 13.6.1. The %verify Directive The %verify directive is used to control which of nine different file attributes are to be verified by RPM. The attributes are:


522

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

owner -- The file's owner. group -- The file's group. mode -- The file's mode. md5 -- The file's MD5 checksum. size -- The file's size. maj -- The file's major number. min -- The file's minor number. symlink -- The file's symbolic link string. mtime -- The file's modification time.

If the keyword not precedes the list, every attribute except those listed will be verified.
%verify(mode md5 size maj min symlink mtime) /dev/ttyS0

See also: The %verify Directive in Section 13.6.1.

E.6.2 Directory-related Directives
The %docdir Directive The %docdir directive is used to add the specified directory to RPM's internal list of directories containing documentation. When a directory is added to this list, every file packaged in this directory (and any subdirectories) will automatically be marked as documentation. See also: The %docdir Directive in Section 13.6.2. The %dir Directive The %dir directive is used to direct RPM to package only the directory itself, regardless of what files may reside in the directory at the time the package is created.
%dir /usr/blather


Section E.8:Conditionals

523

See also: The %dir Directive in Section 13.6.2.

E.7 The %package Directive
The %package directive is used to control the creation of subpackages. The subpackage name is derived from the first name tag in the spec file, followed by the name specified after the %package directive. Therefore, if the first name tag is:
Name: foo

and a subpackage is defined with the following %package directive:
%package bar

the subpackage name will be foo-bar. See also: Section 13.7, The Lone Directive: %package.

E.7.1 The %package -n Option
The -n option is used to change how RPM derives the subpackage name. When the -n option is used, the name following the %package directive becomes the complete subpackage name. Therefore, if a subpackage is defined with the following %package directive:
%package -n bar

the subpackage name will be bar. See also: Section 13.7.1, -n -- Use As the Entire Subpackage Name .

E.8 Conditionals
The %ifxxx conditionals are used to begin a section of the spec file that is specific to a particular architecture or operating system. They are followed by one or more architecture or operating system specifiers, each separated by commas or whitespace.


524

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference

Conditionals may be nested within other conditionals, provided that the inner conditional is completely enclosed by the outer conditional.

E.8.1 The %ifarch Conditional
If the build system's architecture is specified, the part of the spec file following the %ifarch, but before a %else or %endif will be used during the build.
%ifarch i386 sparc

See also: Section 13.8.1, The %ifarch Conditional.

E.8.2 The %ifnarch Conditional
If the build system's architecture is specified, the part of the spec file following the %ifarch but before a %else or %endif will not be used during the build.
%ifnarch i386 sparc

See also: Section 13.8.2, The %ifnarch Conditional.

E.8.3 The %ifos Conditional
If the build system is running one of the specified operating systems, the part of the spec file following the %ifos but before a %else or %endif will be used during the build.
%ifos linux

See also: Section 13.8.3, The %ifos Conditional.

E.8.4 The %ifnos Conditional
If the build system is running one of the specified operating systems, the part of the spec file following the %ifnos but before a %else or %endif will not be used during the build.
%ifnos linux


Section E.8:Conditionals

525

See also: Section 13.8.4, The %ifnos Conditional.

E.8.5 The %else Conditional
The %else conditional is placed between a %if conditional of some persuasion, and an %endif. It is used to create two blocks of spec file statements, only one of which will be used in any given case.
%ifarch alpha make RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -I ." %else make RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %endif

See also: Section 13.8.5, The %else Conditional.

E.8.6 The %endif Conditional
An %endif is used to end a conditional block of spec file statements. The %endif is always needed after a conditional, otherwise, the build will fail.
%ifarch i386 make INTELFLAG=-DINTEL %endif

See also: Section 13.8.6, The %endif Conditional.


526

Appendix E:Concise Spec File Reference


Section F.1:Where to Get RPM

527

F RPM-related Resources
There are a number of resources available to help you with RPM, over and above the RPM man page, and this book. Here are some pointers to them.

F.1 Where to Get RPM
Perhaps before asking, Where can I get RPM? it might be better to see if RPM is already installed on your system. If you have Red Hat Linux on your system, it's there already. But be sure to check on other systems -- people are porting RPM to different systems every day, and it just might be there waiting for you. Here's a quick way to see if RPM is installed on your system:
% rpm --version RPM version 2.3 %

If this command doesn't work, it might be that your path doesn't include the directory where RPM resides. Check the usual "binary" directories before declaring RPM a no-show!

F.1.1 FTP Sites
If you can't find RPM on your system, you'll have to grab a copy by FTP. RPM can be found practically anywhere Red Hat Linux is available. While the most obvious site, ftp.redhat.com, is certainly an option, it might not be your best choice. For one, it can be very busy. For another, unless your link to the Internet is near Red Hat's sprawling development campus in Durham, North Carolina, there's probably an FTP site that is closer to you. Here is a list of sites that mirror Red Hat's main FTP site. Be aware that this list changes frequently, so don't be surprised if a particular site no longer mirrors Red Hat, or has moved it from the paths listed below: 1
FTP Site Directory 1 An up-to-date copy of the list of mirror sites is always available on ftp.redhat.com, in the file MIRRORS.


528

Appendix F:RPM-related Resources

======== sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk ftp.mpi-sb.mpg.de ftp.jate.u-szeged.hu ftp.ibp.fr ftp.gwdg.de ftp.msu.ru ftp.sgg.ru sunsite.mff.cuni.cz ftp.ton.tut.fi ftp.funet.fi sunsite.icm.edu.pl ftp.arch.pwr.proc.pl ftp.rhi.hi.is ftp.nvg.unit.no ftp.pk.edu.pl ftp.nluug.nl dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl ftp.iol.ie sunsite.auc.dk ftp.tku.edu.tw ftp.cs.us.es ftp.is.co.za ftp.dstc.edu.au ftp.lab.kdd.co.jp sunsite.ust.hk

========= /packages/linux/redhat /pub/linux/mirror/ftp.redhat.com /pub/linux/redhat /pub/linux/distributions/redhat /pub/linux/install/redhat /pub/Linux/RedHat /mirror/redhat /OS/Linux/Distributions/Redhat /pub/Linux/RedHat /pub/Linux/images/RedHat /pub/Linux/redhat /mirror/linux/redhat /pub/linux/RedHat /pub/linux/redhat /pub/linux/redhat /pub/os/Linux/distr/RedHat /pub/Unix/Linux/Distributions/redhat /pub/Unix/Linux/distributions/RedHat /pub/os/linux/redhat /Unix/Linux/RedHat /pub/Linux/redhat /linux/distributions/redhat /pub/linux-redhat /OS/Linux/packages/redhat /pub/Linux/distributions/redhat /pub/OS/linux/redhat

ftp.sunsite.dcc.uchile.cl ftp.interpath.net schlitz.cae.wisc.edu ftp.wownet.net ftp.engr.uark.edu ftp.infomagic.com ftp.wgs.com ftp.drcdrom.com ftp.hkstar.com ftp.pht.com linux.ucs.indiana.edu ftp.uoknor.edu ftp.cc.gatech.edu

/pub/linux/redhat /pub/Linux/RedHat /LINUX/redhat /pub/linux/redhat /pub/mirrors/linux/RedHat /pub/linux/redhat /pub/linux-redhat /pub/Linux/redhat /pub/linux/redhat /pub/linux/redhat /linux/redhat /pub/linux/distributions/redhat


Section F.1:Where to Get RPM

529

uiarchive.cso.uiuc.edu ftp.caldera.com ftp.cms.uncwil.edu ftp.wilmington.net sunsite.unc.edu gatekeeper.dec.com ftp.rge.com linuxwww.db.erau.edu ftp.eit.com ftp.real-time.com

/pub/systems/linux/distributions/redhat /pub/mirrors/redhat /linux/redhat /linux/redhat /pub/Linux/distributions/redhat /pub/linux/redhat /pub/systems/linux/redhat /pub/linux/distrib/redhat /pub/mirrors/redhat /pub/redhat

F.1.2 What Do I Need?
Once you find a nearby site with RPM, and have found the directory where it's kept, you'll notice a variety of files, all starting with "rpm". What are they? Which ones do you need? Here's a representative list, along with the ways in which each file would be used:
ftp> ls 200 PORT command successful. 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for total 2689 drwxr-xr-x 6 root 97 2048 Jul 18 10:04 drwxr-xr-x 6 root 97 1024 Aug 2 10:09 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Jan 22 1996 lrwxrwxrwx -rw-rw-r--rw-r--r--rw-rw-r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-rw-r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r-226 Transfer ftp> 1 root 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 root 24 Jan 22 59239 365319 278620 282015 279855 359354 356943 122157 51132 54470 35504 Jan Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul May 20 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 1 1996 1996 06:05 06:05 06:05 06:05 06:05 06:05 06:05 06:05 06:05 04:28 /bin/ls. . .. RPM-HOWTO.ps -> ../../docs/RPM-HOWTO.ps RPM-HOWTO.txt -> ../../docs/RPM-HOWTO.txt paper.ps.gz rpm-2.2.2-1.axp.rpm rpm-2.2.2-1.i386.cpio.gz rpm-2.2.2-1.i386.rpm rpm-2.2.2-1.sparc.rpm rpm-2.2.2-1.src.rpm rpm-2.2.2.tar.gz rpm-devel-2.2.2-1.axp.rpm rpm-devel-2.2.2-1.i386.rpm rpm-devel-2.2.2-1.sparc.rpm rpmbuild.ps.gz

root 97 root 97 root 97 root 97 root 97 root 97 root 97 root 97 root 97 root 97 root 97 complete.


530

Appendix F:RPM-related Resources

Although the version numbers may change, the types of files kept in this directory will not. The files RPM-HOWTO, paper.ps.gz, and rpmbuild.ps.gz contain a variety of information concerning RPM. As such they are valuable sources of supplemental information. The remaining files contain RPM, packaged for various architectures, and in source form. We'll look at them, grouped according to their contents. Here's the first group of files:
-rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r-1 root 1 root 1 root 97 97 97 365319 Jul 18 06:05 rpm-2.2.2-1.axp.rpm 282015 Jul 18 06:05 rpm-2.2.2-1.i386.rpm 279855 Jul 18 06:05 rpm-2.2.2-1.sparc.rpm

The files above are the binary package files for RPM version 2.2.2, release 1, on the Digital Alpha, the Intel 386/486/Pentium, and the Sun SPARC. Note that the version number will change in time, but the other parts of the file naming convention won't. As binary package files, they must be installed using RPM. So if you don't have RPM yet, they won't do you much good. 2 Let's look at the next file:
-rw-r--r-1 root 97 359354 Jul 18 06:05 rpm-2.2.2-1.src.rpm

This is the source package file for RPM version 2.2.2, release 1. Like the binary packages, the source package requires RPM to install -- therefore, it cannot be used to perform an initial install of RPM. Let's see what else there is here:
-rw-r--r--rw-r--r--rw-r--r-1 root 1 root 1 root 97 97 97 122157 Jul 18 06:05 rpm-devel-2.2.2-1.axp.rpm 51132 Jul 18 06:05 rpm-devel-2.2.2-1.i386.rpm 54470 Jul 18 06:05 rpm-devel-2.2.2-1.sparc.rpm

The files above are binary package files that contain the rpm-devel subpackage. The rpm-devel package contains header files and the RPM library, and is used for
2 If your goal is to install RPM on one of these systems, it might be a good idea to copy the appropriate binary package. That way, once you have RPM running, you can reinstall it with the --force option to ensure that RPM is properly installed and configured.


Section F.2:Where to Talk About RPM

531

developing programs that can perform RPM-related functions. These files cannot be used to get RPM running. That leaves two files left:
-rw-rw-r--rw-rw-r-1 root 1 root 97 97 278620 Jul 18 06:05 rpm-2.2.2-1.i386.cpio.gz 356943 Jul 18 06:05 rpm-2.2.2.tar.gz

The first file is a gzipped cpio archive of the files comprising RPM. After uncompressing the file, cpio can be used to extract the files and place them on your system. Note, however, that there is a cpio archive for the i386 architecture only. To extract the files, issue the following command:
# zcat file.cpio.gz | (cd / ; cpio --extract) #

(When actually issuing the command, file.cpio.gz should be replaced with the actual name of the cpio archive.) Note that the archive should be extracted using GNU cpio version 2.4.1 or greater. It may also be necessary to issue the following command prior to using RPM:
# mkdir /var/lib/rpm #

The last file, rpm-2.2.2.tar.gz, contains the sources for RPM. Using it, you can build RPM from scratch. This is the most involved option, but it is the only choice for people interested in porting RPM to a new architecture. See Chapter 8, Miscellania for an example of RPM being built from the sources.

F.2 Where to Talk About RPM
As much as we've tried to make this book a comprehensive reference for RPM, there are going to be times when you'll need additional help. The best way to connect with other that use RPM is to try one of the following mailing lists.


532

Appendix F:RPM-related Resources

F.2.1 The rpm-list Mailing List
Red Hat maintains a mailing list specifically for RPM. In order to subscribe to the list, it's necessary to send a mail message to:
rpm-list-request@redhat.com

On the message's subject line, place the word subscribe. After a short delay, you should receive an automated response with general information about the mailing list. To send messages to the list, address them to:
rpm-list@redhat.com

As with other on-line forums, it's advisable to "lurk" for a while before sending anything to the list. That way, you'll be able to see what types of questions are acceptable for the list. Let the list's name be your guide; if the message you want to send doesn't have anything to do with RPM, you shouldn't send it to rpm-list! In general, the flavor of rpm-list is a bit biased towards RPM's development, building packages, and issues surrounding the porting of RPM to other systems. If your question is more along the lines of, How do I use RPM to install new software? consider reviewing the first half of this book and lurking on rpm-list a while first.

F.2.2 The redhat-list Mailing List
The redhat-list mailing list is meant to serve as a forum for users of Red Hat's Linux operating system. If your questions concerns the use of RPM on Red Hat Linux, then the redhat-list is a good place to start. To subscribe, send a message to:
redhat-list-request@redhat.com

On the message's subject line, place the word subscribe. After a short delay, you should receive an automated response with general information about the mailing list. As with rpm-list, it's best to lurk for a while before posting to the list To send messages to the list, address them to:


Section F.3:RPM On the World Wide Web

533

redhat-list@redhat.com

F.2.3 The redhat-digest Mailing List
Some people might find the number of messages on redhat-list more than they can handle. However, there is a digest version of the list available. Each digest consists of one or more messages sent to redhat-list. The digest is sent out when the collected messages reach a certain size. Therefore, a digest might have one very long message, or twenty smaller ones. In either case, you'll have the collected knowledge of the Red Hat development team and their many customers delivered in one message. To subscribe to redhat-digest, send a message to:
redhat-digest-request@redhat.com

On the message's subject line, place the word subscribe. After a short delay, you should receive an automated response with general information about the mailing list. To send messages to the list, address them to:
redhat-list@redhat.com

As always, observe proper "netiquette" -- lurk before you leap!

F.3 RPM On the World Wide Web
Up-to-date information on RPM can always be found at Red Hat's web site:
http://www.redhat.com/

The site's content changes frequently, so it's impossible to specify an exact URL for RPM information. However, the site is very well run, and always has a comprehensive table of contents as well as a search engine. Either should make finding information on RPM easy.


534

Appendix F:RPM-related Resources

F.4 RPM's License
RPM is licensed under the GNU General Public License, or as it's more commonly called, the GPL. If you're not familiar with the GPL, it would be worthwhile to spend a few minutes looking it over. The purpose behind the GPL is to ensure that GPL'ed software remains freely available. "Freely available" doesn't necessarily mean "at no cost," although GPL'ed software is often available by anonymous FTP. The idea behind the GPL is to make it impossible for anyone to take GPL'ed code, and make it proprietary. But enough preliminaries! The best way to understand the GPL is to read it:

F.5 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991 Copyright © 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

F.5.1 Preamble
The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software -- to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.


Section F.5:GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE

535

To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. We protect your rights with two steps: 1. 2. copyright the software, and offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software.

Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations. Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.

F.5.2 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 1. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program


536

Appendix F:RPM-related Resources

or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you". Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does. 2. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty; and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License along with the Program. You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee. 3. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions: a. b. You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and the date of any change. You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. If the modified program normally reads commands interactively when run, you must cause it, when started running for such interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this License.

c.


Section F.5:GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE

537

(Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on the Program is not required to print an announcement.) These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it. Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or collective works based on the Program. In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under the scope of this License. 4. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following: a. Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,

b.


538

Appendix F:RPM-related Resources

c.

Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you received the program in object code or executable form with such an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.)

The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component itself accompanies the executable. If distribution of executable or object code is made by from a designated place, then offering equivalent access from the same place counts as distribution of the source parties are not compelled to copy the source along with 5. offering access to copy to copy the source code code, even though third the object code.

You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License. However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such parties remain in full compliance. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribute the Program or its derivative works. These actions are prohibited by law if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or distributing the Program (or any work based on the Program), you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so, and all its terms and conditions for copying, distributing or modifying the Program or works based on it. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensor to copy,

6.

7.


Section F.5:GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE

539

distribute or modify the Program subject to these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to this License. 8. If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues), conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program. If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other circumstances. It is not the purpose of this section to induce you to infringe any patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the integrity of the free software distribution system, which is implemented by public license practices. Many people have made generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed through that system in reliance on consistent application of that system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot impose that choice. This section is intended to make thoroughly clear what is believed to be a consequence of the rest of this License. 9. If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the original copyright holder who places the Program under this License may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in


540

Appendix F:RPM-related Resources

or among countries not thus excluded. In such case, this License incorporates the limitation as if written in the body of this License. 10. The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of the General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. 11. If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program into other free programs whose distribution conditions are different, write to the author to ask for permission. For software which is copyrighted by the Free Software Foundation, write to the Free Software Foundation; we sometimes make exceptions for this. Our decision will be guided by the two goals of preserving the free status of all derivatives of our free software and of promoting the sharing and reuse of software generally. NO WARRANTY 12. BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION. 13. IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER


Section F.5:GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE

541

PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR REDISTRIBUTE THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS

F.5.3 How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs
If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms. To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively convey the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.
Copyright © 19yy This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.


542

Appendix F:RPM-related Resources

Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail. If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode:
Gnomovision version 69, Copyright © 19yy name of author Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type "show w". This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type "show c" for details.

The hypothetical commands "show w" and "show c" should show the appropriate parts of the General Public License. Of course, the commands you use may be called something other than "show w" and "show c"; they could even be mouse-clicks or menu items -- whatever suits your program. You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or your school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if necessary. Here is a sample; alter the names:
Yoyodyne, Inc., hereby disclaims all copyright interest in the program `Gnomovision' (which makes passes at compilers) written by James Hacker. , 1 April 1989 Ty Coon, President of Vice

This General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the library. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Library General Public License instead of this License.


Section G.1:PGP -- Privacy for Regular People

543

G An Introduction to PGP
Assuming you're not the curious type and haven't flipped your way back here, you are probably here looking for some information on the program known as Pretty Good Privacy, or PGP.

G.1 PGP -- Privacy for Regular People
PGP, or "Pretty Good Privacy", is a program that is intended to help make electronic mail more secure. It does this by using sophisticated techniques known as public key encryption. If you find yourself wondering what electronic mail and making information unreadable by spies has to do with RPM, you have a good point. However, although PGP's claim to fame is the handling of e-mail in total privacy, it has some other tricks up its sleeve.

G.1.1 Keys your Locksmith Wouldn't Understand
As we mentioned above, PGP uses public key encryption to do some of its magic. You might guess from the name that this type of encryption involves keys of some sort. But, as you might imagine, these are not keys that you can copy down at the local hardware store. They are numbers -- really large numbers. Here's what a key might look like 1:
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAzEpXjUAAAEEAKG4/V9oUSiDc9wIge6Bmg6erDGCLzmFyioAho8kDIJSrcmi F9qTdPq+fj726pgW1iSb0Y7syZn9Y2lgQm5HkPODfNi8eWyTFSxbr8ygosLRClTP xqHVhtInGrfZNLoSpv1LdWOme0yOpOQJnghdOMzKXpgf5g84vaUg6PHLopv5AAUR tCpSZWQgSGF0IFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuIDxyZWRoYXRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAFUD BRAxc0xcKO2uixUx6ZEBAQOfAfsGwmueeH3WcjngsAoZyremvyV3Q8C1YmY1EZC9 SWkQxdRKe7n2PY/WiA82Mvc+op1XGTkmqByvxM9Ax/dXh+peiQCVAwUQMXL7xiIS axFDcvLNAQH5PAP/TdAOyVcuDkXfOPjN/TIjqKRPRt7k6Fm/ameRvzSqB0fMVHEE 5iZKi55Ep1AkBJ3wX257hvduZ/9juKSJjQNuW/FxcHazPU+7yLZmf27xIq7E0ihW 1 When we say that keys are numbers, we aren't lying even though the example key doesn't look like a number. It has been processed so that it can be concisely displayed using only printable characters.


544

Appendix G:An Introduction to PGP

8zz9JNFWSA9+8vlCMBYwdP1a+DzVdwjbJcnOu3/Z/aCY2lYi9U45PzmtU8iJAJUD BRAxU9GUGXO+IyM0cSUBAbWfA/9+lVfqcpFYkJIV4HuV5niVv7LW4ywxW/SftqCM lXDXdJdoDbrvLtVYIGWeGwJ6bES6CoQiQjiW7/WaC3BY9ZITQE4hWOPQADzOnZPQ fdkIIxuIUAUnU/YarasqvxCs5v/TygfWUTPLPSP+MqGqJcDF2UHXCiNAHrItse9M h7etkYkAdQMFEDEp61/Nq6IpInoskQEB538C+wSIaCNNDOGxlxS5E2tClXRwMYf0 ymuKXs/srvIUjOO7xuIH4K7qcSSdI4eUwuXy6w5tWWR3xZ/XiygcLtKMi2IZIq0j wmFq7MEk+Xp8MN7Icawkqj1/1p0p4EwKKkIU64kAlQMFEDEp6pZEcVNogr/H7QEB jp4D/iblfiCzVTA5QhGeWOj1rRxWzohMvnngn29IJgdnN3zuQXB1/lbVV3zYciRH NyvpynfcTcgORHNpAIxXDaZ7sd48/v7hHLarcR5kxuY0T75XOTGOKTOlFvb4XmcY HZR2wSWSBteKezB5uK47A6uhwtvPokV0Owk9xPmBV+LPXkW4 =pnqV -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

PGP uses two different types of keys: public and private. The public key, as its name suggests, can be shared with anyone. The key shown above is, in fact, a public key. The private key, as its name suggests, should be kept a secret. PGP creates keys in pairs -- one private and one public. A key pair must remain a pair; if one is lost, the other by itself is useless. Why? Because the two keys have an interesting property that can be exploited in two ways: · · A message encrypted by a given public key can only be decrypted with the corresponding private key. A message encrypted by a given private key can only be decrypted with the corresponding public key.

In the case of sending messages in total privacy, the key pairs are used in the first manner. It allows two people to exchange private messages without first exchanging any "secret codes". The only requirement is that each know the other's public key. However, for RPM, the second method is the important one. Let's say a company needs to send you a document, and you'd like to make sure it really did come from them. If the company first encrypted the file with their private key and sent it to you, you would have an encrypted file you couldn't read. Or could you? If you have the company's public key, you should be able to decrypt it. In fact, if you can't, you can be sure that the message you received did not come from them 2!
2 Or at least that it didn't make it to you unchanged.


Section G.1:PGP -- Privacy for Regular People

545

It is this feature that is used by RPM. By using PGP's public key encryption, it is possible to not only prove that a package file came from a certain person or persons, but also that it was not changed somewhere along the line.

G.1.2 Are RPM Packages Encrypted?
In a word, no. Rather than being encrypted, RPM package files possess a digital signature. This is a way of using encryption to attach a signature (again, basically a large number) to some information, such that: · · The signature cannot be separated from the information. Any attempt to verify the signature against any other information will fail. The signature can only be produced by one private key.

In the case of RPM, the information being signed is the contents of the .rpm file itself. A digital signature is just like a regular signature. It doesn't obscure the contents of the document being signed, it just provides a method of determining the authenticity of a document. Here is an example of a digital signature turned into printable text:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----Version: 2.6.3a Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBMXVGMFIa2NdXHZJZAQFe4AQAz0FZrHdH8o+zkIvcI/4ABg4gfE7cG0xE Z2J9GVWD2zi4tG+s1+IWEY6Ae17kx925JKrzF4Ti2upAwTN2Pnb/x0G8WJQVKQzP mZcD+XNnAaYCqFz8iIuAFVLchYeWj1Pqxxq0weGCtjQIrpzrmGxV7xXzK0jus+6V rML3TxQSwdA= =T9Mc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

G.1.3 Do All RPM Packages Have Digital Signatures?
Again, no. In a perfect world, every .rpm file would be signed. However, RPM has no formal requirement that this be the case. There is also no requirement that you do anything special with a signed .rpm file. Think of it as an extra feature that you can take advantage of, or not -- it's strictly your choice.


546

Appendix G:An Introduction to PGP

G.1.4 So Much to Cover, So Little Time
PGP has a wealth of features, 99% of which we will not cover in this book. For more information on the basics of encryption, Applied Cryptography, by Bruce Schneier, contains a wealth of information on the subject. For more details on PGP specifically, O'Reilly's PGP: Pretty Good Privacy by Simson Garfinkel is an excellent reference. If you'd rather surf the 'Net, use your favorite World Wide Web index to hunt for "crypto" or "PGP", and you'll be in business.

G.2 Installing PGP for RPM's Use
To use RPM's PGP-related capabilities, you'll need to have PGP installed on your system. If it's installed already, you should be able to flip to the chapters on verifying package signatures and signing packages and be in business in a matter of minutes. Otherwise, read on for a thumbnail sketch of what's required to install PGP.

G.2.1 Obtaining PGP
The first step in being able to verify .rpm files is to get a copy of PGP. Unfortunately, this is not quite as simple as it might sound. The reason is that PGP is very controversial stuff. Why the controversy? It centers on PGP's primary mission -- to provide a means of communicating with others in complete privacy. As we've discussed, PGP uses encryption to provide this privacy. Good encryption. Very good encryption. Encryption so good, it appears some of the world's governments consider PGP a threat to their national security. Know Your Laws! Various countries have differing stances on the use of "strong encryption" products such as PGP. In some countries, possession of encryption software is strictly forbidden. Other countries attempt to control the flow of encryption technology into (or out of) their country. It is vital you know your country's laws, lest you find yourself in prison, or possibly in front of a firing squad!


Section G.2:Installing PGP for RPM's Use

547

Patent/Licensing Issues Surrounding PGP Over and above PGP's legal status, there are other aspects to PGP that people living in the U.S. and Canada should keep in mind: · PGP is free -- for non-commercial use only. If you are going to use PGP for business purposes, you should look into getting a commercial copy. PGP is marketed in the United States by: Pretty Good Privacy, Inc.
2121 S. El Camino Real Suite 902 San Mateo , CA 94403 (415) 572-0430 (415) 572-1932 http://www.pgp.com/

·

Part of the software that comprises PGP is protected by several United States patents. Versions of PGP approved for use in the U.S. contain a licensed version of this software, known as RSAREF. RSAREF includes a patent license that allows the use of the software in noncommercial settings only. Commercial use of the technology contained in RSAREF requires a separate license. This is one reason why there are restrictions on the commercial use of PGP in the United States and Canada. While people outside the U.S. and Canada can use RSAREF-based PGP, they will probably choose the so-called "international" version. This version replaces RSAREF with software known as MPILIB. MPILIB is, in general, faster than RSAREF, but it cannot legally be used in the United States or Canada.

To summarize, if you are using PGP for commercial purposes in the U.S. or Canada, you'll need to purchase it. Otherwise, people living in the U.S. or Canada should use a version of PGP incorporating RSAREF. People in other countries can use any version


548

Appendix G:An Introduction to PGP

of PGP they desire, though they'll probably choose the MPILIB-based "international" version 3. Getting RSAREF-based PGP The official source for the latest version of PGP based on RSAREF is the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Due to the restrictions on the export of encryption technology, the process is somewhat convoluted. The easiest way to obtain PGP from the official MIT archive is to use the World Wide Web. Point your web browser at:
http://web.mit.edu/network/pgp.html

Simply follow the steps, and you'll have the necessary software on your system in no time. There is a more cumbersome method that doesn't use the Web. It involves first using anonymous ftp to obtain several files of instructions and license agreements. You will then be directed to use telnet to obtain the name of a temporary ftp directory containing the PGP software. Finally, you can use anonymous ftp to retrieve the software. To start this process, ftp to:
ftp://net-dist.mit.edu

Then change directory to:
/pub/PGP

Obtain a copy of the file README and follow the instructions in it exactly. If all this seems like too much trouble, there is another alternative. You can find copies of PGP on just about any BBS, FTP, or Web site advertising freely available software. Be aware, however, that "Floyd's Storm Door and BBS Company" may not be as trustworthy a place as MIT to obtain encryption software. It's really a question of how paranoid you are.
3 Note that there are no commercial restrictions regarding PGP in countries other than the U.S. and Canada.


Section G.2:Installing PGP for RPM's Use

549

Outside the United States and Canada For people living in other countries, it is much easier to find PGP (depending on the legality of encryption software, of course). Try any of the places you'd normally look for free software. Keep in mind, however, that you shouldn't download PGP from any sites in the U.S. Doing so is considered an "export" of munitions, and can get the people responsible for the site in deep trouble. Wherever you eventually get PGP from, since the patents that complicate matters for the U.S. do not apply abroad, you'll probably end up with the "international" versions of PGP.

G.2.2 Building PGP
Building PGP is mostly a matter of following instructions. However, users of ELFbased Linux distributions (Such as Red Hat Linux) will find that PGP will not build. The problem, according to the PGP FAQ, is that two files do not properly handle the C preprocessor directives that affect support for ELF. The changes are to two files: 80386.S and zmatch.S. Near the beginning of each, you'll find either a #ifndef or a #ifdef for SYSV. If you find:
#ifndef SYSV

It should be changed to read:
#if !defined(SYSV) && !defined(__ELF__)

If you find:
#ifdef SYSV

It should be changed to read:
#if defined(SYSV) || defined(__ELF__)

After making these changes, PGP should build with no problems.


550

Appendix G:An Introduction to PGP

G.2.3 Ready to Go!
After building and installing PGP, you're ready to start using RPM's package signature capabilities. If your primary interest is in checking the signatures on packages built by someone else, Chapter 7, Using RPM to Verify Package Files will tell you everything you need to know. On the other hand, if you are a package builder and would like to start signing packages, Chapter 17, Adding PGP Signatures to a Package will have you signing packages in no time.


Index

551

Index
A -a option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88, 127 adding dependencies ( See dependencies, adding ) --addsign option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329 limitations to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 architecture ( See multi-platform package building ) ( See RPM, philosophy behind, multi-architecture ) architectures, support for multiple . . 28 archive ( See format, RPM file, parts of, archive ) area, build ( See build area ) arguments ( See scripts, install/erase-time, arguments in ) %attr directive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269, 521 attributes, file ( See file attributes verified ) ( See file attributes, specifying ) automatic dependencies ( See dependencies, automatic ) autoreqprov tag . . . . 235, 285, 510 B build area alternate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313

building in . . . . . . . . . creating . . . . . . . . . . . . . using . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . build roots danger using . . . . . . . . . . defining. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . issues surrounding . . . %build script . . . . . . . . . . --buildarch option building packages ( See rpm -b ) --buildos option . . . . --buildroot option warning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . buildroot tag . . . . . . . . C

. . . . . . . . . . . . 315 . . . . . . . . . . . . 313 . . . . . . . . . . . . 314 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... ...... ...... 247, ...... ...... ...... ...... 239, 313 307 312 514 207 208 213 216 512

-c option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 --clean option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 %clean script . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248, 515 command options ( See the option itself ) conditionals ( See platform-dependent, conditionals ) ( See spec file, conditionals in ) ( See the conditional itself ) %config directive . . . . . . . . . . . 269, 521 config files . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 21, 24, 36­37, 40, 47, 52, 62, 68, 75, 97­98, 102, 109, 114, 125, 164, 296­297, 300­301 configuration files


552

Index

( See config files ) conflicts tag . . . . . . . . 234, 288, 509 copyright tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230, 507 D -d option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 database, rebuilding RPM ( See --rebuilddb option ) ( See RPM, command reference, rebuild database mode ) --dbpath option . . . 57, 68, 113, 133 dependencies adding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 automatically added . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282 example of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284 autoreqprov tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 basic concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 conflicts tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288 manually added . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 provides tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 requires tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 scripts related to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282 find-provides . . . . . . . . . . . 283 find-requires . . . . . . . . . . . 283 serial numbers, using . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 version requirements, adding . . . 286 virtual packages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 %description tag . . . . . . . . 228, 506 %dir directive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273, 522 directives ( See spec file ) ( See the directive itself ) distribution tag . . . . . . . . 230, 507 %doc directive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268, 521

%docdir directive . . . . . . . . . . . 271, 522 Doug Hoffman ( See Hoffman, Doug ) --dump option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 E %else conditional . . . . . . . . . . . 279, 525 %endif conditional . . . . . . . . . 279, 525 environment variables ( See scripts, build-time, environment variables in ) ( See scripts, install/erase-time, environment variables in ) erasing packages ( See rpm -e ) Ewing, Marc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24­26, 31 examples building packages ( See package building ) excludearch tag . . . . 236, 360, 510 --excludedocs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 --excludedocs option . . . . . . . . . . . 52 excludeos tag . . . . . . . . 238, 360, 511 exclusivearch tag . 237, 361, 511 exclusiveos tag . . . . 238, 361, 511 F -f option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . hint when using . . . . . . . . . . . . . Faith, Rik. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . file attributes verified ( See rpm -V, attributes ) file attributes, specifying . . . . . . file, spec . 89, 127 . . . . . . . 89 . . 23­24 verified . . . . . 317


Index

553

( See spec file ) files, configuration ( See config files ) find-provides script . . . . . . . . . . 283 find-requires script . . . . . . . . . . 283 --force option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51, 80 format, package file ( See format, RPM file ) format, RPM file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447 caveats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448 file() command,identifying with . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465 naming convention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447 parts of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448 archive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462 header. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459 header structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452 header, analysis of . . . . . . . . . . . . 459 header, tags used in . . . . . . . . . . . 461 lead. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449 lead, reduced use of. . . . . . . . . . . 451 signature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455 signature, analysis of . . . . . . . . . 455 tools for studying . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463 FTP package specification using . . . . . . 38 specifying non-standard port with . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 specifying username and password with . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 --ftpport option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 --ftpproxy option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 G

-g option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92, 129 General Public License ( See GPL ) GNU General Public License ( See GPL ) GPL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 534 group tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231, 508 H -h option . . . . . . . . . header ( See format, header ) --help option . . Hoffman, Doug . . . I -i option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . icon tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %ifarch conditional . . 277, %ifnarch conditional 278, %ifnos conditional . . . 278, %ifos conditional . . . . . 278, --ignorearch option . . . . --ignoreos option . . . . . . . . --includedocs option . . . information package-wide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . per-file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --initdb option . . . . . . . . . . . . %install script . . . . . . . . . . . . . installing packages ...... 230, 363, 364, 364, 363, ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 248, . . 94 507 524 524 524 524 . . 58 . . 59 . . 53 . . 29 . . 30 148 514 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 RPM file, parts of, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24


554

Index

( See rpm -i ) L -l option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 label, package ( See package label ) lead ( See format, RPM file, parts of, lead ) library functions, RPM ( See rpmlib ) M Marc Ewing ( See Ewing, Marc multi-platform package features supporting . . hints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . platform detection . . . reasons for . . . . . . . . . . . . N name tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --nodeps option . . . . . . . . --nofiles option . . . . . . nopatch tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . --nopgp option . . . . . . . . . --noscripts option . . 67, 80, 130 nosource tag . . . . . . . . . . . . numbers, serial ( See dependencies, bers, using ) . . . . . . . . . 227, 50, 66, ......... . . . 243, ......... ......... 505 129 131 513 144 . 55, ) building .......... .......... .......... .......... O

( See spec file, tags in, serial )

--oldpackage option . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 options, command ( See the option itself ) P -p option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91, 128 package advantages of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 building anywhere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307 contents of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 labels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 labels vs. names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 management of how to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 reasons for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 reasons for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 relocatable ( See relocatable packages ) virtual ( See dependencies, virtual packages ) what is it . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 package building real-world example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 build area, creating . . . . . . . . . . . 368 building with RPM . . . . . . . . . . . 383 building, initial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 directives, adding . . . . . . . . . . . . . 390

. . . . .

. . . . .

353 354 364 355 353

. . . . 241, 512 serial num-


Index

555

%files list, adding . . . . . . . . . . %files list, finalizing . . . . . . initial build . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . initial build, installing . . . . . . . . initial build, performing . . . . . . installing with RPM . . . . . . . . . . overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . package files, creating . . . . . . . . packages, testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . patches, applying w/RPM . . . patches, generating . . . . . . . . . . . scripts, adding built-time . . . . scripts, creating. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sources, unpacking w/RPM . spec file, first-cut. . . . . . . . . . . . . . testing after build . . . . . . . . . . . . . simple example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . build directory, creating . . . . . . %files list, creating . . . . . . . . package, building . . . . . . . . . . . . . scripts, %clean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . scripts, install/uninstall . . . . . . . sources, obtaining . . . . . . . . . . . . . spec file, %build section . . . spec file, %files list . . . . . . . . spec file, %install section spec file, %prep section . . . . . spec file, creating . . . . . . . . . . . . . spec file, preamble . . . . . . . . . . . . troubleshooting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %package directive . . . 275, 335, -n option . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275, 336, package file format ( See format, RPM file )

379 388 368 371 369 383 367 385 395 381 374 379 396 380 376 385 173 173 180 182 181 181 174 179 180 179 177 174 174 187 523 523

package label . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87, 126 package-wide information ( See information, package-wide ) packager tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232, 508 packages building ( See rpm -b ) erasing ( See rpm -e ) files, verifying ( See rpm -K ) getting information about ( See rpm -q ) installing ( See rpm -i ) querying ( See rpm -q ) removing ( See rpm -e ) uninstalling ( See rpm -e ) upgrading ( See rpm -U ) verifying installed ( See rpm -V ) %patch macro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263, 518 -b option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 compressed patches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266 -E option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 example of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 options to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519 -p option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 -P option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264


556

Index

patch tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242, 513 per-file information ( See information, per-file ) --percent option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 PGP building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 549 getting more information on . . . . 546 introduction to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 543 legal, patent issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 546 obtaining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 546 "international" version . . . . . . . 549 RSAREF-based version . . . . . . 548 overview of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 543 RPM's use of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 545 setting up for RPM's use. . . . . . . . 546 signatures adding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321 configuring RPM for . . . . . . . . . 324 key pair generation . . . . . . . . . . . 321 reasons for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321 signing packages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 platform information, overriding at build-time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 platform information, overriding at install-time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 platform-dependent conditionals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361 features of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362 %ifarch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363 %ifnarch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364 %ifnos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364 %ifos. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363 nesting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363 rpmrc file entries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356

arch_canon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356 arch_compat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 buildarch_translate 357 buildos_translate . . . . 357 optflags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 os_canon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356 os_compat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 excludearch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 excludeos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 exclusivearch . . . . . . . . . . . 361 exclusiveos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361 PM ( See RPM, ancestors of, PM ) PMS ( See RPM, ancestors of, PMS ) %post script . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250, 516 %postun script . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251, 516 %pre script . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250, 515 --prefix option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 prefix tag . . . . . . . 239, 294, 335, 511 %prep script . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246, 514 Pretty Good Privacy ( See PGP ) %preun script . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251, 516 --provides option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 provides tag . . . . . . . . . . 233, 289, 508 Q --queryformat option carriage control in. . . . . . . example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . literal text in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 105 . . 54 105


Index

557

tags for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ARCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ARCHIVESIZE . . . . . . . AUTOREQPROV . . . . . . . BUILDHOST . . . . . . . . . . BUILDROOT . . . . . . . . . . BUILDTIME . . . . . . . . . . CHANGELOG . . . . . . . . . . CONFLICTFLAGS . . . CONFLICTNAME . . . . . CONFLICTVERSION COPYRIGHT . . . . . . . . . . DEFAULTPREFIX . . . DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . DISTRIBUTION . . . . . EXCLUDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXCLUDEARCH . . . . . . . EXCLUDEOS . . . . . . . . . . EXCLUSIVE . . . . . . . . . . EXCLUSIVEARCH . . . EXCLUSIVEOS . . . . . . . FILEFLAGS . . . . . . . . . . FILEGIDS . . . . . . . . . . . . FILEGROUPNAME . . . FILELINKTOS . . . . . . . FILEMD5S . . . . . . . . . . . . FILEMODES . . . . . . . . . . FILEMTIMES. . . . . . . . . FILENAMES . . . . . . . . . . FILERDEVS . . . . . . . . . . FILESIZES . . . . . . . . . . FILESTATES. . . . . . . . . FILEUIDS . . . . . . . . . . . . FILEUSERNAME . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

106, ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......

491 495 500 503 492 502 492 494 501 501 501 494 502 492 493 499 502 502 499 503 503 498 497 499 498 498 497 498 496 497 496 496 497 498

FILEVERIFYFLAGS GIF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GROUP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ICON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INSTALLPREFIX . . . INSTALLTIME . . . . . . . NAME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOPATCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOSOURCE . . . . . . . . . . . . OS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PACKAGER . . . . . . . . . . . . PATCH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . POSTIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . POSTUN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PREIN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PREUN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROVIDES . . . . . . . . . . . . RELEASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REQUIREFLAGS . . . . . REQUIRENAME . . . . . . . REQUIREVERSION . ROOT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RPMVERSION. . . . . . . . . SERIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SIZE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SOURCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SOURCERPM . . . . . . . . . . SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRIGGERFLAGS . . . . . TRIGGERINDEX . . . . . TRIGGERNAME . . . . . . . TRIGGERSCRIPTS . TRIGGERVERSION . URL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

499 493 494 499 502 493 491 501 501 495 494 495 495 496 495 496 500 492 500 500 500 498 503 492 493 494 499 492 504 504 503 503 503 495


558

Index

VENDOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VERIFYSCRIPT . . . . . . . . . . . . . VERSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XPM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tags, array iterators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tags, iterating single-entry . . . . . . tags, listing available . . . . . . . . . . . . tags, modifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tags, width and justification . . . . querying packages ( See rpm -q ) --quiet option . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150, R --rcfile option . . . . . . . . . . . . 113, 134, 146, 219, 472 --rebuild option . . . . . . . . . . --rebuilddb option . . . . . . --recompile option . . . . . . recursion ( See recursion ) release tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . relocatable packages . . . . . . . . . . building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %files list restrictions . . prefix tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . reasons for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . software requirements . . . . . testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . removing packages ( See rpm -e ) --replacefiles option . 51, 80

493 504 491 494 109 111 111 107 107 219

. . 56, 67, . . . . . . 221 . . . . . . 147 . . . . . . 220 227, ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 506 293 298 296 294 293 295 296 301

. . . . . . . 45,

interaction with config files . . . . . . 47 problems from using. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 --replacepkgs option . . 44, 51, 80 --requires option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 requires tag . . . . . . . . . . 233, 286, 509 --resign option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328 limitations to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328 Rik Faith ( See Faith Rik ) --root option . . . . . . 56, 67, 113, 133 root, build ( See build roots ) RPM ancestors of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 PMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 RPM version 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 RPM version 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 RPP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 basics of developing with . . . . . . . 167 command reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483 add signature mode . . . . . . . . . . . 489 build mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488 check signature mode . . . . . . . . 490 erase mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487 global options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483 informational options . . . . . . . . . 483 initialize database mode. . . . . . 490 install mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485 query mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483 rebuild database mode. . . . . . . . 490 rebuild mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489 recompile mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489 resign mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489


Index

559

upgrade mode . . . . . . . . . . verify mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . creating patches for . . . . . . . design goals of . . . . . . . . . . . . inputs to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . patches. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . spec file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . library functions ( See rpmlib ) license . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mailing list redhat-digest . . . . redhat-list . . . . . . . . rpm-list . . . . . . . . . . . . . obtaining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . files to download . . . . . . . FTP sites carrying. . . . . . outputs from . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . binary package . . . . . . . . . source package . . . . . . . . . philosophy behind . . . . . . . . ease of use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . easy builds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . multi-architecture . . . . . . multi-operating system pristine sources . . . . . . . . . resources related to . . . . . . . spec file %build section of . . . . %files list . . . . . . . . . . . . %install section of . preamble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %prep section of . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

486 485 168 . . 26 167 167 167 168

. . . . . . . 534 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533 532 532 527 529 527 171 171 171 161 164 163 164 164 161 527 169 170 169 168 169

scripts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . support, information for . . . . . . . . . what it does . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WWW resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpm -b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . build stages of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a................................. b................................. c................................. i................................. l................................. p................................. options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . related commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . what it does . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpm -e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . basic command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . config file handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . problems using . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . what it does . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpm -i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . performing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . warning message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpm -K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . additional software used by . . . . basic use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . configuring PGP for use by. . . . . example of failed verification . . options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140, output when missing public key output when package unsigned

169 531 170 533 191 194 200 198 196 197 201 194 205 220 193 . . 61 . . 62 . . 68 . . 63 . . 69 . . 62 . . 33 . . 41 . . 36 . . 38 . . 40 137 138 139 138 142 144 142 141


560

Index

what it does . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 rpm -q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 examples using . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 finding config files with . . . . . . . . . 114 finding documentation with . . . . 115 finding largest packages with . . 117 finding recently installed packages with . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 finding similar packages with . . 116 information selection options . . . . 94 options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 package selection options . . . . . . . . . 86 querying uninstalled packages with . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 what it does . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 rpm -U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 as replacement for rpm -i . . . . . . 78 basic command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 config file handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 what it does . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 rpm -V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 attributes verified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 file group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 file mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 file ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 file size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 major number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 MD5 checksum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 minor number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 modification time . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 symbolic link . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 output of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

verification, control of. . . . . . . . . . . 134 what it does . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 what it verifies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 RPM database, rebuilding ( See --rebuilddb option ) ( See RPM, command reference, rebuild database mode ) RPM file format ( See format, RPM file ) RPM version 1 ( See RPM, ancestors of, RPM version 1 ) RPM version 2 ( See RPM, ancestors of, RPM version 2 ) rpm2cpio use of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 extracting files in package . . . 153 listing files in package . . . . . . . 153 what it does . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 rpmlib . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 examples using . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435 functions dependency processing . . . . . . . 424 error handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407 header entry manipulation . . . 432 header iterator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 434 header manipulation . . . . . . . . . . 430 output control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427 package information . . . . . . . . . . 408 package manipulation . . . . . . . . 419 package/file verification . . . . . 423 RPM database manipulation. 413 RPM database search . . . . . . . . . 415


Index

561

RPM database traversal . . . . . rpmrc-related . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . signature verification . . . . . . . . variable manipulation . . . . . . . guide to using . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmlib functions, list of . . . . . . . . . . . dbiFreeIndexRecord(). headerAddEntry() . . . . . . . . headerCopy() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . headerDump() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . headerFree() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . headerFreeIterator(). headerGetEntry() . . . . . . . . headerInitIterator(). headerIsEntry(). . . . . . . . . . headerNew() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . headerNextIterator(). headerRead() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . headerSizeof() . . . . . . . . . . . headerWrite() . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmArchScore() . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdbClose() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdbFindByConflicts() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdbFindByFile() . . . . . . rpmdbFindByGroup() . . . . rpmdbFindByProvides() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdbFindByRequiredBy(). . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdbFindPackage() . . . . rpmdbFirstRecNum() . . . . rpmdbGetRecord() . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

414 411 428 410 407 407 407 416 433 431 432 431 435 432 434 433 431 434 430 431 430 412 413

. 419 . 416 . 417 . 418 . . . . 418 417 414 415

rpmdbInit() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdbNextRecNum() . . . . . . . rpmdbOpen() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdbRebuild() . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdepAddPackage() . . . . . rpmdepAvailablePackage(). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdepCheck() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdepDependencies(). . rpmdepDone() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdepFreeConflicts() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdepRemovePackage(). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmdepUpgradePackage(). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmErrorCode() . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmErrorSetCallback() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmErrorString() . . . . . . . . . rpmFreeSignature() . . . . . rpmGetArchName() . . . . . . . . . rpmGetBooleanVar() . . . . . rpmGetOsName() . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmGetVar() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmGetVerbosity() . . . . . . . rpmIncreaseVerbosity() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmInstallPackage() . . . rpmInstallSourcePackage(). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmIsDebug() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmIsVerbose() . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmNotifyFunction() . . .

414 415 413 414 425 426 426 425 427 427 426 425 408 408 408 429 412 410 412 410 428 427 420 419 428 428 422


562

Index

rpmOsScore() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmReadConfigFiles(). . rpmReadPackageHeader() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmReadPackageInfo(). . rpmRemovePackage() . . . . . rpmSetVar() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmSetVerbosity() . . . . . . . rpmShowRC() . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rpmVerifyFile(). . . . . . . . . . . rpmVerifyScript() . . . . . . . rpmVerifySignature(). . rpmrc file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . entries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . arch_canon. . . . . . . . . . . 356, arch_compat . . . . . . . . . 357, buildarch_translate buildarchtranslate . . builddir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . buildos_translate . . . . buildostranslate . . . . . . buildroot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . cpiobin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . dbpath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . defaultdocdir . . . . . . . . . . . distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . excludedocs . . . . . . . . . . . 52, ftpport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ftpproxy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . messagelevel . . . . . . . . . . . . . netsharedpath . . . . . . . 99, optflags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . os_canon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356, os_compat . . . . . . . . . . . . 357,

413 411 409 408 422 411 428 412 423 424 429 467 473 473 475 357 474 476 357 474 476 476 476 477 477 477 477 477 478 478 478 474 475

packager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 pgp_name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 pgp_path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 require_distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480 require_icon . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480 require_vendor . . . . . . . . . 480 rpmdir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480 signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481 sourcedir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481 specdir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481 srcrpmdir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481 timecheck . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481 tmppath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482 topdir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482 vendor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482 locations of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468 /etc/rpmrc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 472 ~/.rpmrc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 472 /usr/lib/rpmrc . . . . . . . . . 469 syntax of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 RPP ( See RPM, ancestors of, RPP ) S -s option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . scripts ( See RPM, spec file, scripts ( See the script itself ) build-time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . environment variables in . . . . . install/erase-time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . arguments in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 ) 244 245 248 249


Index

563

environment variables in . . . . . 249 verification-time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 --scripts option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 serial numbers ( See dependencies, serial numbers, using ) ( See spec file, tags in, serial ) serial tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234, 509 %setup macro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252, 517 -a option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 -b option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 -c option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254 -D option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255 -n option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 options to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517 -T option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 use in multi-source spec files. . . 258 --short-circuit option . . . . . 205 --showrc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467 --sign option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209, 325 using with multiple builds . . . . . . 327 signature ( See format, RPM file, parts of, signature ) ( See PGP, signatures ) ( See RPM, command reference, add signature mode ) ( See RPM, command reference, check signature mode ) source package files installing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 use of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 source tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240, 512 spec file

comments in . . . . . . . . . . . . conditionals in . . . . . . . . . . %else. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %endif . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %ifarch . . . . . . . . . . . . %ifnarch . . . . . . . . . . %ifnos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %ifos. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . contents of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . directives in %attr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %config . . . . . . . . . . . . %dir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %doc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %docdir . . . . . . . . . . . . %package, options %verify . . . . . . . . . . . . %files list directives %files list in . . . . . . . . . -f option . . . . . . . . . . . . macros in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %patch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %patch, options to %setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %setup, options to scripts in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %build . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %clean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %install . . . . . . . . . . %post. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %postun . . . . . . . . . . . . %pre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %prep. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %preun . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

225, ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 225, ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 267, ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......

505 276 525 525 524 524 524 524 505 521 521 522 521 522 523 521 267 520 274 252 518 519 517 517 244 514 515 514 516 516 515 514 516

... ... ... ... ... to ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...


564

Index

%verifyscript . . . . . . . . . tags in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . autoreqprov . . . . . . . . . . . . . buildroot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . conflicts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . copyright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %description . . . . . . . . . . . distribution . . . . . . . . . . . excludearch . . . . . . . . . . . . . excludeos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . exclusivearch . . . . . . . . . exclusiveos . . . . . . . . . . . . . group. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . icon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . nosource . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . packager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . provides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . release . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . requires . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . serial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . url . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vendor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . version . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . subpackages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . build-time scripts, unchanged building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . definition of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . example requirements . . . . . . . . . %files list changes . . . . . . . . . . %package directive . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

516 225 510 512 509 507 506 507 510 511 511 511 508 507 505 512 508 511 508 506 509 509 512 506 508 507 505 333 345 347 333 334 340 335

-n option . . . . . script changes . . . scripts, testing . . . spec file changes tags required by . testing . . . . . . . . . . . . why needed . . . . . . summary tag . . . . . . T

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 229,

336 343 351 335 338 349 333 506

tags autoreqprov . . . . buildroot . . . . . . . conflicts . . . . . . . copyright . . . . . . . %description . . distribution . . excludearch . . . . excludeos . . . . . . . exclusivearch exclusiveos . . . . group. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . icon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . nopatch . . . . . . . . . . . nosource . . . . . . . . . packager . . . . . . . . . patch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . provides . . . . . . . . . release . . . . . . . . . . . requires . . . . . . . . . serial . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

235 239 234 230 228 230 236 238 237 238 231 230 227 243 241 232 242 239 233 227 233 234


Index

565

source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240 summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 url . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 vendor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 version . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 tags, --queryformat ( See --queryformat option, tags for ) tags, dependency-related ( See dependencies ) --test option . . . . . . . . . . . . 43, 64, 210 --timecheck option . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 Troan, Erik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24­26, 31 U uninstalling packages ( See rpm -e ) upgrading packages ( See rpm -U ) URL. . . . . . . . . . 38, 57, 92, 231, 240, 243 package specification using . . . . . . 38 specifying non-standard port with . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 specifying username and password with . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 url tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231, 508 V -v option variables, ( See ment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41, 96, 132, 140 environment scripts, build-time, environvariables in )

( See scripts, install/erase-time, environment variables in ) vendor tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231, 507 %verify directive . . . . . . . . . . . 270, 521 verifying installed packages ( See rpm -V ) verifying package files ( See rpm -K ) %verifyscript script . . . . 251, 516 --version option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 version tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227, 505 virtual packages ( See dependencies, virtual packages ) -vv option 42, 63, 112, 132, 145, 218 W --whatprovides option . . . . . . . . . 93 --whatrequires option . . . . . . . . . 93