Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://selena.sai.msu.ru/Symposium/lipskiy.doc
Дата изменения: Mon Oct 6 18:10:15 2008
Дата индексирования: Thu Feb 27 20:22:02 2014
Кодировка:

Поисковые слова: п п п п п п п п п п п п п п


LIPSKIY-RODIONOVA' LUNAR ANTIPODES AS PRECURSORS OF A REGULAR WAVE
PLANETOLOGY


G.G.Kochemasov
IGEM of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
kochem@igem.ru / Fax: (009)(095)230 21 79

The first observations of the lunar far side allowed to compare it with
the near side and draw very important conclusions in the very beginning of
planetary studies based on spacecrafts. Yu. N. Lipskiy and Zh. F. Rodionova
noted that basins and maria of the two lunar sides are diametrically
opposite and moreover are placed in mutually perpendicular great circles
[1, 2]. Randomly placed impacts cannot produce this regular pattern.
Following years however obliterated this fundamental fact under burden of
weakly justified but very agressive impact hypothesis.
Studies of symmetries and regularities on other celestial bodies and in
particular on Earth [3, 4] always based themselves on this firmly
established fact of the lunar antipodality. The Lipskiy-Rodionova findings
encouraged scientists believing in regular nature. Accumulation of data
about ubiquity of symmetry-antisymmetry in the world of celestial bodies
extremely heterogeneous by masses, compositions and physical states (from a
small asteroid to Sun) compeled to think about reasons of such a universal
phenomenon. A natural answer was - a wave!
All celestial bodies move in elliptical orbits which were more elongated
in the geological past. Changing orbit curvatures, velocities anf
accelerations cause inertia-gravity waves warping rotating bodies in 4
directions (ortho- and diagonal). An interference of warping waves having
standing character in closed spheres of celestial bodies produces uprising,
subsiding and neutral tectonic blocks size of which depends on a
wavelength. The following theorems of the wave tectonics can be proved [5,
6].
1. Celestial bodies are dichotomic.
2. Celestial bodies are sectoral.
3. Celestial bodies are granular.
4. Angular momenta of different level blocks tend to be equal.
The first theorem reflects an action of fundamental waves (long 2?R,
where R is a body radius), the second one deals with obertones (the first
obertone -?R). The third one describes interference of waves lengths of
which are proportional to orbital periods (a scale is Earth with a granula
size ?R/4). The fourth one explains haw a rotating body keeps its
integrity. Highly non-spherical bodies as asteroids however meet this
requirement with difficulties and thus tend to split producing binaries,
polycomponental bodies, satellites. Larger bodies keeping their overall
sphericity develop tectonic stresses between heterogeneous sector-blocks.
The tectonic granulation depends on orbital periods or frequency of
orbiting. It is rather simple for planets orbiting Sun but complicated for
satellites having the second orbit around their planets. Satellites are
granulated according to their two orbits (high and low frequencies) and by
action of modulated oscillations. In a full concord with the wave theory a
low frequency modulates a high frequency and on satellites surfaces appear
granulas of intermediate sizes. That is why satellites are often covered
with a range of closely spaced granulas (craters) of equal or various
sizes; an impact origin concerns only a part of them. Wave woven modulated
granulas are effective on surfaces of Triton, Titan, Proteus and some other
satellites. Modulated waves are in Jupiter's atmosphere (orbiting around
the centre of Jovian system and around Sun). On heavily cratered surface of
the Moon along with impacts have to be distinguished granulas of ?R/4 size
(maria and basins), ?R/60 and other modulated sizes [7].
It is important to note that similarities of lunar and terrestrial
planetary structures (dichotomy, sectoring, granulation ) make dubious both
the impact and plate tectonic hypotheses prevailing now in planetology and
geology. It is hardly possible that sets of similar structures on two
planetary bodies are produced by two entirely different exo- and endogenic
processes.
The concept of celestial bodies includes Sun (a star) as one of them.
Tectonic dichotomy, sectoring and granulation [6] are inherent in Sun and
so in other stars. Binaries and variable stars are very typical. Some
supergiant stars show heterogeneity in surface brightness. Variability of
stellar atmospheres is a common feature: glitter oscillation, colour
variability, changing spectra, variability of stellar wind, atmospheric
pulsation are well documented [8]. Periodicity or quasiperiodicity of
variability changes from hours to years. Physical mechanisms of stellar
variability are not well understood. We suppose that stellar variability
of various periodicities is connected with geometrizing bodies wave
warpings observed in our solar system. In this relation the Kepler's
explanation of twinkling stars (scintillation) as rotating polyhedrons now
looks very close to reality.

References:
1. Lipskiy Yu. N., Rodionova Zh. F. (1972) Astronomicheskiy Tsirkular, #
712, pp.3-7.
2. Lipskiy Yu. N., Rodionova Zh. F. (1975) In: Cosmochemistry of the Moon
and planets, Moscow, Nauka, pp.602-606 (in Russian).
3. Kochemasov G.G. (1997) In: Regularities and Symmetry in Earth's
Structure, Moscow,"ROST", 151 pp.
4. Fedorov A. E. (1999) In: The Planet Earth System (Non-traditional Issues
of Geology), Moscow, "Harmony", 243 pp.
5. Kochemasov G. G. (1999) Geophysical Research Abstracts, v.1, #3, 700
6. Kochemasov G. G. (1999) 30th Vernadsky-Brown microsymposium on
comparative planetology, Moscow, Vernadsky Inst. (GEOKHI), 47-48.
7. Kochemasov G. G. (1994) LPS XXV, part 2, 715-716.
8. De Jager C. (1980) The Brightest Stars, D. Reidel Publ. Comp.,
Dordrecht, 493 pp.


Summary: The pioneering works of Yu. N. Lipskiy and Zh. F. Rodionova on
regularities in lunar tectonics (1972-1975) were later used in developing a
general planetary wave tectonics conception. It shows a regular character
of tectonic dichotomy, sectoring, granularity of celestial bodies,
including stars. It connects widespread variability of stellar atmospheres
with their wave induced structures.

[pic]