Magnetic field measurements and their uncertainties: the FORS1 legacy

S. Bagnulo, J.D. Landstreet, L. Fossati, and O. Kochukhov

Fig. 1. The polarised spectrum of HD 94660 observed on 2007-03-22 with grism 600B. The top panel shows the normalised derivative of the observed flux, and the panel immediately below shows the observed flux F (black solid line, in arbitrary units, and not corrected for the instrument response), the P_V profile (red solid line centred about 0), and the null profile (blue solid line, offset by тАУ0.75 % for display purpose). The null profile is expected to be centred about zero and scattered according to a gaussian with σ given by the P_V error bars. The P_V error bars are represented with light blue bars centred about тАУ0.75 %. The slope of the interpolating lines in the bottom panels gives the mean longitudinal field from P_V (left bottom panel) and from the null profile (right bottom panel) both calculated using the H Balmer lines only. The corresponding тЯиB_zтЯй and тЯиN_zтЯй values are тИТ1885 ± 90 G and тИТ192 ± 62 G, respectively.

Abstract

Context. During the last decade, the FORS1 instrument of the ESO Very Large Telescope has been extensively used to study stellar magnetism. A number of interesting discoveries of magnetic fields in several classes of stars have been announced, many of which obtained at a ∼ 3 σ level; some of the discoveries are confirmed by measurements obtained with other instruments, some are not. Aims. We investigate the reasons for the discrepancies between the results obtained with FORS1 and those obtained with other instruments.

Methods. Using the ESO FORS pipeline, we have developed a semi-automatic procedure for magnetic field determination. We have applied this procedure to the full content of circular spectropolarimetric measurements of the FORS1 archive (except for most of the observations obtained in multi-object spectropolarimetric mode). We have devised and applied a number of consistency checks to our field determinations, and we have compared our results to those previously published in the literature.

Results. We find that for high signal-to-noise ratio measurements, photon noise does not account for the full error bars. We discuss how field measurements depend on the specific algorithm adopted for data reduction, and we show that very small instrument flexures, negligible in most of the instrument applications, may be responsible for some spurious field detections in the null profiles. Finally, we find that we are unable to reproduce some results previously published in the literature. Consequently, we do not confirm some important discoveries of magnetic fields obtained with FORS1 and reported in previous publications.

Conclusions. Our revised field measurements show that there is no contradiction between the results obtained with the low-resolution spectropolarimeter FORS1 and those obtained with high-resolution spectropolarimeters. FORS1 is an instrument capable of performing reliable magnetic field measurements, provided that the various source of uncertainties are properly taken into account.

Full paper in PDF format

Last Revised: 2011 December 20th